HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060274 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20110112LR,A-c- u u - G a,-l 4
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467
www.SandEC.com
R @
D
January 5, 2011
S&EC Project No. 1021.E1
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attn: Ms. Jean Manuele
JAN 1 2 2011
ON-MQAM
nWAS1bRA1YMATER BRANCH
NCDENR - DWQ
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Attn: Mr. Eric Kulz
Reference: Year Two Monitoring Report
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Warren County, NC
USACE Action ID No. 200221365
DWQ Project No. 20060274
Please find the enclosed Year Two Monitoring Report for the above referenced site. As you will
find in the report, it is our opinion that the stream, wetland, and vegetative components of the
restoration have met the success criteria as described in the Monitoring Plan.
Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments at your earliest opportunity.
We thank you for your assistance to date and look forward to the continued success of this
project.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
cokfi
David Gaineyalol
SA&M Department Manager
Attachments: Year Two Monitoring Report dated December 2010
Cc: Mr. David Lee, Wake Stone Corporation
Newell Farm
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Year Two Monitoring Report
Warren County, North Carolina
December 2010
Cataloging Unit - Tar River Basin 03020102
Prepared For:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 846-5900 • Fax: (919) 846-9467
www.SandEC.com
Wake Stone Corporation
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... l
1.2 Project History ...............................................................................................................................1
1.3 Mitigation Components .................................................................................................................. l
2.0 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Methodoloy .....................................................................................................................................3
2.1.1 Hydrologic Monitoring .................................................................................................... 3
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring ..................................................................................................... 3
2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring ..................................................................................... 5
2.2 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 6
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria ............................................................................................ 6
2.2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria .............................................................................................6
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success Criteria .............................................................................. 8
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success ........................................................................................................... 8
Figure 1 - USGS Vicinity Map
Appendix A - Monitoring Layout
Appendix B - Stream Cross-section and Overbank Event Photos
Appendix C - Groundwater and Rainfall Data
Appendix D - Stream Survey Data
Appendix E - Pebble Count Data
Appendix F - Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
i
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 1.1 Introduction
This monitoring report has been prepared by Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) to present and
evaluate site monitoring data for the period January 2010 through December 2010 for the Newell Farm Stream
and Wetland Restoration Site located in Warren County, North Carolina.
1.2 Project History
' The Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site was restored by the Wake Stone Corporation in order to
offset an estimated 2,058 linear feet of stream channel impacts and an estimated 6.28 acres of wetland impacts
associated with the expansion of its Nash County Quarry. The project site consists of approximately 28 acres
' and is located roughly 2.25 miles southeast of the Town of Warrenton on the west side of Dr. King Road (SR
1001) in Warren County, NC. A vicinity map is included as Figure 1.
Waters on-site drain to Fishing Creek (C; NSW) in the Tar River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloguing Unit
' 03020102). Stream mitigation includes the restoration of approximately 2,551 linear feet of stream and the
enhancement of approximately 737 linear feet of stream. Wetland acreage generated on the Newell Farm
Mitigation Site is based on a wetland delineation performed by S&EC following the completion of site
' construction. Based on the as-built wetland delineation, the wetland mitigation effort includes a total of 18.55
acres of wetlands, including the restoration of prior converted wetlands, the creation of new wetlands, and the
enhancement and preservation of select existing wetlands.
' Construction of the restoration, enhancement, and creation areas on-site was performed during the period
January 2008 through June 2008. All construction and planting was performed by the Wake Stone Corporation.
Periodic construction observation was performed by S&EC in order to ensure that construction was performed
in general accordance with our design intent.
1.3 Mitigation Components
After the completion of project construction, total accrued mitigation credits were tabulated. Field data were
' gathered and evaluated to quantify the length of the stream channel and wetland acreage on-site. Sheet 1 in
Appendix A depicts the overall monitoring layout, with the A----A section line (at Station 7+37) shown to
separate stream enhancement from stream restoration areas. The table below describes the resultant project
stream and wetland mitigation:
Mitigation Type Total
Stream Restoration 2,551 linear feet
Stream Enhancement 737 linear feet
Total Stream Length 3,288 linear feet
Wetland Restoration (2008 Delineation) 5.17 acres
Wetland Creation (2008 Delineation) 3.83 acres
Wetland Enhancement (2008 Delineation) 3.55 acres
Wetland Preservation (2008 Delineation) 6.00 acres
Total Wetland Acreage 2008 Delineation) 18.55 acres
In November 2006, a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) permit was issued to the Wake Stone
Corporation for impacts at the Nash County Quarry. Required mitigation for stream impacts has been exceeded
by 493 feet of stream restoration and 737 feet of stream enhancement on-site. These surplus stream mitigation
credits are detailed below in the column labeled "Mitigation Credit Balance". Similarly, as-built wetland
acreage on-site exceeds the requirement for 6.28 acres of wetland restoration and/or creation by a total of 2.72
acres. Wetland acreage is detailed below. The permit Action ID Numbers are also identified in the following
table:
Impacts on the Nash Compensatory Mitigation Mitigation Provided by Mitigation
County Quarry Required as per the Newell Farm Stream Credit Balance
(USACE Action ID Condition 6 of the 401 and Wetland Restoration
Number 200221365, Water Quality Site (As-built Wetland
DWQ Project Certification Delineation and Survey)
Number 20060274)
2,058 linear feet of 2,058 linear feet of stream 2,551 linear feet restoration +493 linear feet
stream restoration and 737 linear feet restoration and +737
enhancement (total 3,288 linear feet enhancement
linear feet)
6.28 acres of 19.6 acres of combined 5.17 acres restoration, To be determined based
jurisdictional wetland wetland restoration, 3.83 acres creation, (9.00 on final wetland
creation, enhancement and acres of restoration and delineation to be
preservation, including creation), 3.55 acres performed at or near
6.28 acres from restoration enhancement, and 6.00 end of monitoring
and/or creation acres preservation (total period.
wetlands 18.55 acres)
2.0 MONITORING
As described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan dated February 16, 2006, site
monitoring will be performed for a period of 5 years or until approval is given by USACE and DWQ
(hereinafter Agencies) to discontinue monitoring. This report serves as the Year Two Monitoring report for the
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Restoration Site. Stream and wetland monitoring will occur annually, with
quarterly site visits to assess general site conditions. Morphological, vegetative, and hydrologic data collection
will also be performed as required during these site visits. Monitoring reports will be submitted annually to the
Agencies.
2.1 Methodology
This section includes information concerning; 1) hydrologic monitoring, 2) vegetation monitoring, 3) stream
morphology monitoring, and 4) evaluation of site monitoring success. These data will be used for comparison
with data from subsequent monitoring years.
2.1.1 Hydrologic Monitoring
A total of eight (8) Infmities U.S.A., groundwater monitoring gauges (labeled Gauges A through H)
were installed on the site, with four (4) in wetland restoration areas, three (3) in wetland creation areas,
and one (1) in a wetland enhancement area. An Infinities U.S.A., rain gauge was also installed on-site.
The locations of all monitoring gauges are shown in Appendix A on the Monitoring Layout (Sheets 1
through 6).
At the time of the last download on November 1, 2010, gauges had been operational for 210 days of the
2010 growing season. Rainfall was recorded by the on-site Infmities rain gauge. Rainfall during the
2010 monitoring year (for the period November 11, 2009 through November 1, 2010) was 40.82 inches.
Gauge D malfunctioned from June 9, 2010 to July 2, 2010 and did not collect any groundwater data
during this period.
2.1.2 Vegetation Monitoring
Eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots labeled VP1 through VP8 are located across the
site. Each tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plot is a square, 10 meters (32.8 feet) on each side (100
square meters, or approximately 1,075 square feet). Two (2) bank vegetation monitoring plots are
located adjacent to the restored stream channel. Each bank vegetation monitoring plot includes the
planted live stakes along approximately 65 linear feet of stream channel. Three (3) herbaceous
monitoring plots are located across the site. Each herbaceous monitoring plot is a square, 3 meters (10
feet) on each side.
The locations of all monitoring plots are shown in Appendix A on the Monitoring Layout (Sheets 1
through 6). One corner of each vegetation monitoring plot serves as a permanent photo point during
annual monitoring. Photos of each vegetation plot are presented in Appendix F. Vegetation counts for
Monitoring Year Two were performed on September 21 and October 7, 2010 by S&EC.
To aid in future surveys, the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 1 Protocol was used to prepare a
map of the plants within each of the eight (8) tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots. These maps
will be utilized in future years to aid in determining the survival of individual planted stems within each
' vegetation monitoring plot. Each planted stem counted during Monitoring Year Two was flagged with
pink or orange flagging.
A table indicating the total number of live, planted woody stems in each sample plot is included below:
Plot Numbers VP1 VP2 VP3 VP4 VP5 VP6 VP7 VP8 Total
Planted Woody Stems- Year Two Count 16 33 6 0** 9 7 7 9 87
** See Section Z.Z.Z.
Species diversity is described in the following table.
Year
Planted Woody Stems, Two
Year Two (2010) Plots Totals
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
River Birch
(Betula nigra) 1 -- 1 0 -- -- -- 2 4
Silky Dogwood
(Cornus amomum) -- -- 0 7 2 1 1 11
Persimmon
(Diospyros virginiana) -- 2 -- 0 -- -- -- 1 3
Virginia Sweetspire
(Itea virginica) -- 1 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 1
Spicebush
(Lindera benzoin) -- 1 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 1
American Sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis) 9 -- 3 0 -- -- -- 2 14
Swamp Chestnut Oak
(Quercus michauxii) 2 5 1 0 -- -- -- 1 9
Water Oak
(Quercus nigra) -- 1 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 1
Cherrybark Oak
(Quercus pagoda) 3 7 1 0 -- -- -- -- 11
Willow Oak
(Quercus phellos) -- 14 -- 0 -- -- -- -- 14
Silky Willow
(Salix sericea) 1 1 -- 0 -- 5 6 1 16
Arrowwood
(Viburnum dentatum) -- -- -- 0 -- -- -- 1 1
Possumhaw
(Viburnum nudum) -- 1 -- 0 1
Year Two Totals 16 33 6 0 9 7 7 9 87
Year One Totals 16 35 7 0 12 19 16 11 116
Plot Survival Rate 100% 94% 86% N/A 75% 37% 44% 82% 75%
Plot Live Stem Density
(stems/acre) 648 1336 243 0 364 283 283 364 503
Site Average Live Stem 503 stems per acre is avg. of all plots except Plot 4**
Density 440 stems per acre is avg. of all eight plots including Plot 4**
aee section ?.?.?.
4
Planted live stakes were counted within the two (2) bank vegetation monitoring plots. Live stake
' survival was calculated based on data collected during the Year One Monitoring in 2009. Live stake
counts by species and by plot are presented in the following tables:
NOTE: During the 2009 stem count, several specimens of Black Willow (Salix nigra) were mistakenly
flagged and counted as Silky Willow (Salix sericea). These previously counted Black Willows were also
counted during the 2010 Year Two vegetation count. Now that the plants are large enough for proper
identification, specimens of Black Willow have been counted separately from specimens of Silky Willow,
and the original number of planted stems of each species has been amended.
Year 2 (2010) - Bank Plot 1
Common
Name
S ecies
Year Two
Count
Total Number
Planted % of Total
Species
Composition Species
Survival
Rate
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 12 23 16% 52%
Silky Willow Salix sericea 34 34 46% 100%
Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum 5 9 7% 56%
Black Willow Salix nigra 23 23 31% 100%
TOTAL 74 89 100%
Live Stake Survival = 83.1% 100.0%
Year 2 (2010) - Bank Plot 2
Common Name
Species
Year Two
Count
Total Number
Planted % of Total
Species
Composition Species
Survival
Rate
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 15 23 43% 65%
Silky Willow Salix sericea 8 8 23% 100%
Arrowwood Viburnum dentatum 2 6 6% 33%
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 1 6 3% 17%
Black Willow Salix nigra 9 9 26% 100%
TOTAL 35 52 100%
Live Stake Survival
=
67.3%
100.0%
Herbaceous species composition varies throughout the restoration site, with all areas densely covered
with herbaceous vegetation. The three herbaceous monitoring plots are all currently 100 percent
covered with herbaceous vegetation, and thereby meet the requirement of being over 50 percent covered
with herbaceous vegetation.
2.1.3 Stream Morphology Monitoring
Fourteen (14) stream cross-sections consisting of seven (7) nested riffle-pool pairs were established on-
site and are shown in Appendix A on Sheet 1. The Year Two stream survey, including cross-section
data, and representative longitudinal profile data, was performed by the Wake Stone Corporation in
September 2010.
Representative Longitudinal Profile No.l data was collected from Cross-section Pool 4 to Cross-section
Pool 5. Representative Longitudinal Profile No. 2 data was collected from Cross-section Pool 6 to
Cross-section Pool 7.
To assess continued channel stability, comparisons of cross-section and representative longitudinal
profile data from the Year Two, Year One, and As-Built data are presented graphically in Appendix D.
Photos of each surveyed stream cross-section (all taken while facing downstream) are presented in
Appendix B.
2.2 Results
This section includes a summary of site monitoring as compared to established success criteria for hydrologic,
vegetation, and stream morphology. For additional information, the interested reader is referred to the
appendices.
2.2.1 Hydrologic Success Criteria
Success criteria for wetland hydrology, as described in S&EC's Conceptual Stream and Wetland
Restoration Plan, include the saturation of the upper 12 inches of soil for at least 18 consecutive days
during the growing season. There is no specific data regarding the average growing season for Warren
County, NC; however, the growin season for Vance County, located immediately west of Warren
County, is 210 days (from April 6t through November 1st)
Hydrologic monitoring data for the 2010 (Year Two) monitoring year indicates that the site is
experiencing conditions consistent with local jurisdictional wetlands. All eight (8) gauges on-site have
met hydrology requirements for the 2010 monitoring year. Consecutive days of saturation for the 2010
growing season range from 33 days to 209 days of the 2010 growing season. Although Gauge D
malfunctioned, as previously noted, it did meet the required success criteria. Data collected for the
monitoring period are presented in graphical format in Appendix C.
Based on our site observations and recorded groundwater gauge data, the site has performed
successfully during the 2010 (Year Two) monitoring season with respect to hydrology.
2.2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
' The success criteria of planted woody stems within the riparian wetlands are based on the combined
survival of tree and shrub species for the 5-year monitoring period. Survival of woody species planted
within the restored buffers and wetlands must be at least 320 stems per acre through Monitoring Year
Three, 288 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 4, and 260 stems per acre through Monitoring Year
5. The stem count is based on an average of the stem counts of the eight (8) evaluated 10x10-meter tree
and shrub buffer vegetation plots. The success criteria of the two (2) bank vegetation plots along the
restored channels are based on the survival of approximately 50 percent of live-stake bank plantings for
the 5-year monitoring period. Vegetative success criteria of 50% coverage will be required at the end of
the 5-year period for the herbaceous planting zones. This coverage will be qualitatively evaluated based
on observation of the three (3) herbaceous monitoring plots and herbaceous vegetation within other
planted areas.
6
The average number of stems per vegetation survival monitoring plot is 10.9 stems for Monitoring Year
Two. Based on the eight (8) vegetation survival monitoring plots, the overall site planted woody stem
density is 440 stems per acre for the 2010 (Year Two) monitoring season. There are thirteen (13)
different planted woody species represented within the eight (8) tree and shrub monitoring plots.
** NOTE: Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is located within an area of wetland enhancement. The area
surrounding Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 is heavily vegetated with natural volunteer herbaceous
species and is regularly inundated with shallow water approximately 6 to 24 inches in depth. Soil in
this area has a high organic content. Enhancement of this area consisted of modifications to the
surrounding grade in order to improve the hydrology of the area. This area was not planted due to
the level of inundation at the time of planting. Enhancement of this area consisted of grading the
surrounding areas to improve hydrology. Based on a visual inspection of the inundated portions of
the wetland enhancement area including and surrounding Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4, the area
appears.f mctional, is a well vegetated wetland, and contributes to overall site diversity by providing
a more open wetland type necessary for many native plant and animal species. We will continue to
observe Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 and the surrounding wetland enhancement area in subsequent
monitoring years to assess its progression and the role of this area in the overall ecosystem within
the restoration site. Because the Restoration Plan specifies a total of eight tree and shrub vegetation
monitoring plots, we have included Vegetation Plot 4 in the calculations of site average stem
density; however, it is our opinion that the inundated wetland enhancement area including and
surrounding Vegetation Plot 4 will likely naturally revegetate without further planting efforts.
Volunteer woody species such as Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) were noted during Year
One monitoring. These previously observed stems were noted to be healthy during Year Two
monitoring.
Native herbaceous species have become densely established and are dominant throughout the site.
Herbaceous species observed along stream banks and in the buffer and wetlands on-site include:
• Jewelweed - Impatiens capensis
• Soft Rush - Juncus effi?sus
• Lizard's Tail - Saururus cernuus
• Sedges - Carex spp.
• Switchgrass - Panicum virgatum
• Arrow Arum Peltandra virginica
• Joe-Pye Weed Eupatoriadelphus, fistulosus
• Duck Potato - Sagittaria latifolia
• Goldenrod - Solidago sp.
• Dog-fennel - Eupatorium capillifolium
• Boneset Eupatorium perfoliatum
Many volunteer woody and herbaceous species have appeared due to surrounding forests and mature
trees preserved on-site, which provide a nearby seed source. Volunteer tree and shrub species noted
within the tree and shrub vegetation monitoring plots include Swamp Rose (Rosa palustris), Buttonbush
(Cephalanthus occidentalis), Red Maple (Ater rubrum), American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Mockernut Hickory
1
(Carya tomentosa), Black Willow (Salix nigra), Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), Tag Alder (Alnus
serrulata), and Sweet Gum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Volunteer woody stems within the tree and
shrub vegetation monitoring plots were noted, but not taken into account in calculating planted
woody stem densities within the plots.
Multiflora Rose (Rosa mult flora) and Privet (Ligustrum sinense) are two invasive species that have
been observed on-site. Prior to site construction, the population of Multiflora Rose on-site was treated
with an herbicide to prevent it from dominating the restored wetland and buffer areas. Currently, one
small area of Multiflora Rose is still located on-site, and is being monitored for future herbicide
applications as needed. Privet, although it is a highly invasive species, is not common on the Newell
' Farm site. Very few specimens of Privet were noted in the northern portion of the stream enhancement
area.
Based on current stem density, the vegetative component of the mitigation effort is expected to
meet the established success criteria of 320 live stems per acre by the end of Monitoring Year 3,
288 stems per acre through Monitoring Year 4, and 260 stems per acre through Monitoring Year
5. Live stake counts within bank vegetation monitoring plots currently meet the required
survivability criteria. Herbaceous vegetation in all herbaceous monitoring plots and other areas of
the site demonstrates dense and vigorous growth.
2.2.3 Stream Morphology Success Criteria
Based on visual observation of the restored stream channel, the restored channel is stable. Multiple
overbank events have been documented by the presence of wrack lines, flotsam, and flattened vegetation
observed in the floodplain during various site visits. No areas of severe erosion or failing structures were
observed during this year's monitoring. Any evidenced erosion, bare banks, or failing structures
observed in future monitoring years will be documented and a plan implemented to repair the problem
areas.
A representative pebble count was performed at cross-sections Riffle 5 and Pool 5. The pebble count
shows that both Riffle 5 and Pool 5 are currently composed mainly of medium to coarse gravel. During
the past year, substrate in Riffle 5 has become slightly less coarse, while substrate in Pool 5 has become
more coarse. Data collected are presented in tabular and graphical form in Appendix E.
Per the Mitigation Plan, success criteria have been met in that the stream bedform features and
cross-sections have remained stable (i.e. the restored portion of the stream has retained its
proposed Rosgen stream-type classification of C) through the current monitoring year.
Accordingly, it is our opinion that Year Two monitoring of the stream channel confirms
' morphological success.
2.3 Overall Monitoring Success - Year Two (2010)
Based on vegetation data collected within the sample plots, existing groundwater gauge data, and stream
morphological data, the site meets the success criteria as set forth in the approved Restoration Plan.
?r
f
't
I IS
I 1 11) 1-,
2
n
o mow:
U
0
,l l
p I
W.+ r?
' ?i?/r?? \ ?Vr?--? ???,`';-J? J ?11???? ??l`? ?\ ? ? ?? ??•-?? ?\111 A 1 J ?;
e:;o ?'\.????.=„ ? ?I / ,, ??? ? ?? iii-- ??;'\ 1 ? ?. l?,„.?? - ? ' ?, ???;?? \'? (L ?' _. '? NZ,-'
1.
Project No.
102 I .If I Figure I - U5G5
Vicinity Map
Project Mgr.: Wake 5tone Corp. ? Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Newell Farm Restoration 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
(919) 846-5900 • (919) 846-9467
scale: Warren County, NC Web Page: www,SandEC.com
I" = 2,000
Warrenton and
1812112009 Afton Quadrangles
APPENDIX A - MONITORING LAYOUT
9 ?0 I inoAvi OWN01INOW TV,J]AO
oN P-qG 01411 WOH-5 wa,?ypw;y,v,vm
-
?0oe _ J
:aje3c, NOI1V?JOANOD DN `"OD NN'NJVM
3PJO1S 3NIVM quag7 :uoi?ewl g14,1q] . peon onpy uonoa OIUI f
L9t6-9tN (6161 :xrd 0001 9681616) :OUO9d b19LZ ru110n:,) yp"N
dd 6sluu}insuoa JV;uauiuojeug V Uo$
° •
u .a,d
Ew JilG NOIld9111n
la Iaol
ON hafo,id AJV? leg/V1gN
a?alo.:,l
O??S
,l9 GM0 `O? - gz /.lnr NO A]Xn nS ONI?3.7NIJNI alllnF
.?NO1S ?NVM
J.9 900z `e ?1 90100 NO AQA,8nS 9NI?J33N19NA a?llnll Z
'lldnlxo??,?d ire Sg,?inldgi
llIS TV ?O SNOI9N3nIa (IMd `SNOUVA9l3 `SNOliV:) 1 I
SllON
\ W
z
>-
Q sz
,T
-
;
l
------------
Q
A J
?
z
_
R/
O
z
h" O
bi
J
J
..J
^V
DZ
W
kzlel
d
7A
JNIUSIJ
N O l ld?J 0199'?j
1
`
?
-
n
d3
d N011035 M0
1S
99
1N?W]3NdNN] '
Mg?liS - ,d,, N01-09G ?n09`d a'
S`d9?J'd NOIl`dn?J?S9?J9 aNtllllM ®
ooz o o
sl oo?
GV'? `d lNgA?3NbNN] ClWilM
MO = I I IdOS o
SdI?Jd N011V,?015]21 aNdIlIM Nl?JON
GVJ'c `d NOUVI 3 aNd]19M
J
aN???? o
0
N
Eimp;nc.4lbuuowoyy?sbwmeiQ-_ de WV 13A I ?O i i£- I =qc\? SA
r m r ¦r _ _ m - m m m _ m _ _ _ _ m m
9 a0 Z v hips 1NOlvl 9NI',?OIINOW
:'ON 4PPIIG °17117'
09 ° .. I NOI1V?J0d2'00 DN ` O:) N?NN
3N015 TAVM :7ua117 :uO17
Ja Ja ?lIS NOIld9111W
Meta
7' 1 7!1 ,n i cad W21dd llg/V\gN
1
L-3 jjj)LII!S --
i9t6'9i816161 :xud 006S 9C8 (016) a-4d • 719LZ imjorv.) gp,,N 'g&,jqj . pnoy o9p,d uonca got!
dd 6sluvlinsuoa pluaiuuosFeug 7g HoS
Z 10-
DN I'?1011 NO
NOUVi]D?l
(Lce+L.
INII-___-? CIl10
N O UV10iGJ?l AVI 1S NI
Icl
I?
09 0 0£ 09
,09 = 1 I I-It10S
Nl?JON
0
ij
I J
IAN
I iol J
)NNO11NOW
NOUViIDIn
SSO?D
CI` M1
?gAinD
(00 + 0 *eqG)
iNl gDN`d IN9
AVJIiS N1099
:
- Ir
IMdn
990?0 N30?J
Noou- r goi
9NINSIJ
N OIIVZA OISI?
-
Wd9?J1S
11411 N0110gS MM?9
IN?n]DNdNN9
AVIJIS - .1`411 N011035 9A09`d
Sd??Jd NOI LVA'?199T?A aMd]19NM
Sd9?Jd 1NIW90NVI-Ng aNd]IgM
SH3?Nd NOl Yt 01S9?N aMd]1gM
GVJNV NOLLVIN0 aNVIIIM
S-?ON`d0 ONI?NOIINOW J0010?Ja,IN
SN01109S-SS0'N0 Wd3?J1S ,A4 <
d
SIO-IJ 9NI?JOIINOW N0I1dI991A
SINIO?J 010Nd NOLLVII0?n
=: IA,
Q
w
W
n
O
Q?
z
R/
0
z
0
Q
o_
v,
0
u
E
n
Li
0
0
0
N
m m m m m m m m
9 JO i? 9 hips inok i JNI?OlINOW
oN ]a?N? x17,17=
09 i NOI1V?'Od2)OJ :)N `OD N?"
:aleo? INOIG AAVM :7uay7 :uoq
ea ?a J-115 NOlld9)11W
rmeda :?bW o?d
3 IzOI AAVd ??3MNN
:-on1 »afo,ia :aye
wi aJp pw!B",
c9t6-918(616) :xuj - 006S-948(61(1).aua4d • 41912 -I-L) 4u•'N 'g8ip d . peat' ,ipiy uanea OIUII
dd 6S4UVIjnsuo:) PIUaWUOJJAUa 78 DOS
09 0 O£ 09
r
'09 = 11 1 ?W:)s
0 N
1 0 1
110cd
9NI?OiINOW
N0IiVi]9]n'NN`d9
NOUDIIO?Jd 101'I:)O?J
MOON-r ??o?
-AOON-r 00i
9NIPGIJ
NOIlV?IOIST?J
'
-
AVI
NIS
..d.. N0I1DIS M0119
1N9A?DNVNN-
AVIJ1S - `d, NOUDIG IAOGV
GV?2 1 NOLLVAN]G-T,JJ aNV II;IM
GVJ' d INIAIDNVkNg aNV IIIM
GVJ?V N011101GIJ aNd-I19M
Sd??Jd N0IIV9'JD GNdil;IM
Sgondo 9NI?01IN0W 1D0]0?J(1,W
SNOIIDIS-SSO?JD AVT 1S
SIOIJ S)NI?JOIINOW NOIIVI?51n G
SINIOJ 010Nd NOI-LVI991A
-4-
m
W
W
T-
0
Q
J
QD
z
^_/
z
Q
0
z
0
a
y
0
uJ
0
0
0
N
(N0UVNOiG? )
N :?DnVD
m = m m m
\ \ 1
lip
??`? ?NI?IOIINOW
9 jO t 1331- s incAdi JNI',?OlINOW
ON 20aq 21711 lpo,G wuT,),i PuF:y e?e?m
09 = 1 NOI1V?'Od?JOO ON `OD NJ,?JiV i9Y6-9t81b [6) :"A • 0065 M (616) :-Nd b19LZ F?1°NJ 4NUN 'gAuleb Pod "'P-a -,-d 0[011
21e 3NOls TAVM :7 217 u 'j'e 'j vd `siue:tlnsuO:) IBIU;)UIUOJIAUH V UOS
JDG NO1d9IlIW
nl ?a 7n W ` d VTNV? 119/lAIN
UNg W93N` IN N:I)
d ggndq ?9oiONa?u
-17 lol J
9N INOiI NOUN
NOUVill )gn
(N0UVJ I:D)
? igndq
,?9 O1ON alkN
e 10l (j
9NINOIINOA
NOUViIDIA
igndq
N I`d l
T
'Lj
L
N
j
10/-1 cl
livig9?
z iol J
-DNI?OiINOW
SnogDd9NgN
09 O O£
kINON
0
A
(NOliV N3)
9 igndq
?D OI ON a? N
NOI LD910?J?l ?Ol N00?1
Nook-r ,?Do? L
-
-
9Ndn
SS0?J0 NDO
(J
,IOON-r 0o]
-Ag??0 JNINSIJ
NOIIVAOISI?J
- `
AVId1S
d NOIlD99 M0199
1NgAIDN`d ]Ng
IAV9\d1S - ..d.. N011095 3n09d
GVI?V NOlldA'J1 S9 &? aNd-I19M
GVI?V 1NgAgDNdNN;l aMd119M Q
°-
GVI3 d NOII` ', O1Sld aNV]i]M
GVI? 1 NOlldI?JO CINVIIIM
S-?0Nd0 0N1?JOIINOW ,100-IO'c?a,kkI
SN01109S-990'c?0 AVT?1S <a ?
7J o
SLO-I,d 9NI?JOIINOW NOI1`d1991A w
S1NIOJ OlONJ NOIld1]09A
0
aN999?
0
O
N
temp anoaebwdezmo?dA>borv.e»sclr W1131I ZD I1f:-16901{Z'2?1A ?
9 AO S 1 a 1?iuS 1(l O. ?f1 9W,011NOW
ON 4aay- 'aR'l a.
09 I NOI1V2'Od2J0? JN ` 00 N:AYI"
:a?e?5 3N015 3?VN quaq-) uuq
a 9a ?lIS NOIldJIlIW
la?zoi" 'cad W?Jd? 1?3M?N
IN 718IOJa :IJz
uu .r Jypucg v.??,n
-9t6-9f8(616) "'I • 0061-9V8Mel auogA • h19Li quoN 'gr?ai?21 peon a8pia u1w8 OLOI I
vd `numinsuoi TVjualUU0Jjeud 7g UO f
0214 101ADO-N etl?
?oou-r Noon L
I
-
VA
IN
?:)o?l
'IOOU-r Sol
?1??210 9NPIDJ
NOUVJOiGl?
I
A
VI?IG N01191S M0199
1N-?W-q9NVPN9
AVI(Aig vO1199S 3A09`d
GVI?V 9992Jd aNd119M
GV-TV JVPN9 aNVI1-?M
SVIV 01992J aNd]13M
GVI'V 1`d92Ja aNVTL9M
ow A9010'(?aAN
9902J9 W d32J1S rd
' '?
OW NOIld199?A
01-1J NOIld1I91n
GINIOJ
`
I ld?l 015?? )
9 igndq
0Mo?elkN
? 10-1 cl
N1"d011NOW
?1)
09 O 0£ 09
09 = . 1 ]-IV3G
ul2JON
F)
W
rL
V J
O
Q
z
R/
O
z
O
Q
o_
In
c
0
v
Y
QL)
0
u,
0
T)
0
0
N
is?
9 ?o 9 1 iiius 1NOJ.F i JNINOlINOW
ON 1da4S :apil aaayy LU0 3 ucS ,??n?a
09 = NOIlV?JOd?'OJ JN ` OJ N3??'HM C9t6-9t8 (6161 .-1 • 0065-948 (616) ll'?4d • t19LZ -11-J UPON 'q PI" . P-d o8piy uonea 01011
:a?eOC 3NO1S 3'?IV,N :}uaq-? :uui?e?Ol vol es uiollnSUO:) JVJIIaTUU0JjAU3 3S UOS
IP9 NOIld9I11W
ime?Q :?6(ry ic??
I T 7.7 A?IV=l TTV\?N
09 0 0?' 09
09 = 19Td9S
u1?JON
0
JI
V9
I/UU
»J
DA
)9A
(N0JiV]` l3)
j igndq
?? 01 O? CIJ? N
N0119910? J 901'19O?J
'loop-r I190I
?NVA-SSO219 N9O-d
,Aoou-r 901
'Agg?J9 9NIPDA
NOI MJO1Sg?J
'
-
AV?
dlS
,V NOIlD99 M0199
1N?W99NVPN9
VNVJ?IS - V NOIlO-?S 9A09`d
GVI,JV NOILLVA,J G;E&l aNd-I19M
GVI d lNgAIDNVNN3 (]WigM
\
GVI d N0IIV'd0lS9?J aNH-III/ V
GVI'd d NOLLVI? 9 aNIVIl311A
S?9N`d9 9N1?JOIINOW ,19OlO',?aJ.N
SNOIID99-SSO?J9 Wb9?J1S (2
S1O-Id 9N1?JOIINOW NOUVE91n ?
S1NIOd OIONd NOIld1999n
aN9991
W
W
W
T-
0
Q
z
R/
O
z
O
Q
o_
N
0
v
y
C
0
w
0
0
0
N
m r r r
APPENDIX B - STREAM CROSS-
SECTION AND OVERBANK EVENT PHOTOS
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
` W, t
? s
VT7
Riffle 1 Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E 1
Riffle 1- Year 2 (2010)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
" xr ? JEr,? ?? I
5 y
ra
y r
n
1
4 . ?.5 ? C +i? IrA y dd a..
N
Pool 1 Year 1 (2009)
Pool 1 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E1
Appendix B
Riffle 2 Year 1 (2009)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 2 Monitoring 2010
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Project No. 1021.E1
Riffle 2 Year 2 (2010)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
A
' ? yw? ?MJ ?aE 1
f
= ? r
? t
?t b ti*
:x «/^.. ?w t Lq
N 7 ? rj7
Pool 2 Year 1 (2009)
3} ?
? 1!'a
Pool 2 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 1.E 1
Appendix B
Riffle 3 Year 1 (2009)
Stream Cross-Section Photos
?y
Y"f
l
11 tr
Nom;
VIA
i
Riffle 3 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 1.E 1
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
r g
?r?ra
a l :!,!' FC R to t4 f
='" ..
h»
40"?
r t l
m
41' r
i¢
r
Y ! i7P
141
AB of -F ?y V A r
10
Pool 3 - Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.El
Pool 3 Year 1 (2009)
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
0
tr ? i i a
4P `!`• e1 ?? ti?C
4 Y
xr tYR
i ?
P y1 ? p_
>r ;4LLr ?t ?' • r P ?
i y A
??`
Riffle 4- Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 4 -Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E l
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
if
v ?
? "aY
Sr ?4i n
'46 O d
a
Al'.. e?
F ?
Pool 4 Year 1 (2009)
Pool 4 -Year 2 (2010)
.x °>. i,? y 1. Y+F?r.• "
"P: ! ej 491 ?Q i +*.kY'?°.d n' ? ?'7!I• -.
r
F .wF%
L
v
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E 1
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
10
rgy?RG i^,??"?sr{ ??` x Est y,? dy
?? •` 14 i
9 j
Riffle 5 - Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 5 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102111
Appendix B
Pool 5 - Year 1 (2009)
ti; . v_
f9?L $ tr d.
-A 11?11
-44 4&
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Wil,
Pool 5 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 2 Monitoring 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021.E 1
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
? ?+?' ' ?M1 d? A e? r?? 1'6 ? a
? u f? ? d V
J d?R ;?+J Q l t ?r? r? s? + ? W' g } ?r t ? X r ?? ??y? i ,
a sL 1
'! it+'? 4'!lt°5??, v fir:!! Fe 1? ?? f f' t' .
3 r 15
it, '2 v? 'iC ? R.? y v n ?r r, ?' ??.e
Riffle 6 Year 1 (2009)
? 4-1
4,1
Riffle 6 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 LEI
Appendix B
Pool 6 - Year 1 (2009)
Stream Cross-Section Photos
_ tf 1§ 9
4; G *l
l u. °
+ ? ro
?q' _ Ai !'!3^ ?x?E:. I.d.I?n.t'1?9u4jrc` 3'.$a 9 d' 1• ? is'y, f `.64 1 $. 'i ? $j
t S ? t Y'" ? 9 ? rM?1S S ? ?s? YF ,
r
? ? ^4E 4 • X. ? N L
M 6 y9. r
All;
Pool 6 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E I
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
i
t? X
Riffle 7 - Year 1 (2009)
Riffle 7 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E1
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
yc
Pool 7 Year 1 (2009)
N U
k x
# ? f
a w Y
411
R
+{ k
'MM"p K9 _.`?{ ?'k ltd 'e
Pool 7 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 1.E I
Appendix B
Stream Cross-Section Photos
Wrack Piles fi•om Overbank Event - Stream Enhancement Section March 2010
Wrack Piles fiom Overbank Event Stream Restoration Section March 2010
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E l
I APPENDIX C - GROUNDWATER AND RAINFALL DATA
O
r
O
N
r
L
E
Z
O
O
O
N
T"
r
E L
M E
L
O
Z
Q) O
,cn
Z
Q
E
V
m
m
L
O
O
2
01-100-LZ
01-100-EL
0 L-daS-6Z
0 L-daS-S L
0 L-daS- L
0 L-6nd-8 L
0 L-6ny-t,
0
0L-Inf -LZ
0
0 L-Inf-L
C?
0 L-unr-EZ V
0 L-unr-6 .0
U
0 L-AeW-gZ a L
0 L-AeW-Z L C
O L-jdy-gZ O r I"?
? v
O L-jdy-t,L C
OL-aeW-LE 0
0 L-aeW-L L
0 L-aeW-E (D
0 L-gaj-L L
Q
0 L-gaj-E
0 L-uer-OZ
0 L-uer-g V
60-0a(]-CZ
60-0aa-6
60-AON-9Z
60-noN-L L
O O O O O O O
M N N co
sayoui `.ialeM of yldaa
m m m m r m m m m m= m m mm m= m
O
r
N
r
i
CD
E
0
O
Z
O
0
N
E L
L ?
M E
L
O
Z
O
Z ?
Q
E
O
V
0
C?
L
O
O
PE;
-- - - - 0 NoO-£
- - O LAGS-6Z
i
I F
-- 0 L-daS-s;
L
- 0 L-daS-
+ -- 0 L-bnV-9 L
` p L-6ny-t, J.
0L-Inf -LZ
- 0L-Inf -L
rr nn
- - -- 0 L-unr-£Z V
p L-unr-6 .O
L rn
V
•'' a
o L-Aew-sz
._ 0)
'r 0 L-AeW-Z L
C
- --- 0 L-ady-gZ O
? T
- - pL-aew- L£ 0
0)
OL-aeW-LL
- - - p L-JeW-£ V
?- --
0 L-gaA-L L
-? W
- - - 0 L-gaj-£
- - - pL-uef-OZ
' V
- :? -uer
01 -g
60-09G-CZ
--s T ---- - 60-090-6
60-noN-SZ
60-noN-L L
O O O O O O O
MJ N N C'7
?'
sayaui `ialeM of yldea
Ooft
O
r
O
N
r
L
E
O
Z
O
? O
M N
U.
r'
E
Z 0
O
Z
m
C
O HOO-LZ
0 L-100-£ L
O L-daS-6Z
- - - - - p L-daS-S L
- - - -- - p L-&S- L
- - - p L-6nb'-8 L
I
- 0 L-6ny-t,
f-- - - -- - OL-Inf -LZ
-- -- - OL-Inf -L
- - 0 L-unf -£Z
-- - OL-unr-6 .0
-- O L-AeW-gZ a
-- - p L-AeIN-Z L ?i
-- -
0 L-ady-gZ C
-- 0 L-ady-t L O
- pL-aeW-L£ 0
- - p L-aeW-L L
p L-MIN-£
i
- -- 0 L-q, -L L
- - --- 0 L-qa-4-£
- p L-uef -0Z
O L-uer-g
- - 60-0a0-£Z
- - 60-0aQ-6
-- 60-AON-9Z
- 60-AON-L L
tt N N 00 C4 N ?- 00 O N O
N N ?- O O O O
mpui `llejuieH AI1ea
APPENDIX D - STREAM SURVEY DATA
N
6>
O
O O
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
c?
v
N
O
D +
O O
v Z
z
- CD
D O
N +
J?l
c O
f"'r
O
+
CJl
O
O
+
0
r-n
Z
Z
D C)
Z
70
ran O
rn z
z rn
rn rn
rn
rn
n O D
= Z /Z1
O
v O
r
N -
N
O
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
6l 6l J J J
J c9 - (? cn
O O O O O
O O O O O
co
v
N
v
I
D
N
C
N
6>
CJ1
O
O O
+
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
C1?
D
O +o
z w
CD
CO
O
+
O
O
+
Ul
O
O
+
0
rn
z
z
D n
z
n
rn O
rn U
CP z
z rn
rn ?
C? rn
1
rn
= z0 D
70
7
U --n
?rn
rn
N _
O
w
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
? ? J J J
O O O O O
O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
N
W
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
c?
v
N
1 ? O
D
O ?
l c?
I ?
D O
c? O
c=r
O
+
Ul
O
O
6>
O
N N N
61 6> 6>
CIt J C9
O O O
O O O
N
J
O
O
N
J
W
O
O
rn
z
z
D n
z
rn /70
O
ran 0 z
z 6 rrn
rn rn
rn -n?
_ D
70
O
v O
r
? N
N
(.T1
c?
v
N
CD
v
D
c
c=r
N
O
O O
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
D
O
O
+
O
O
+
-p
O
O
U
O
rn
z
T
D n
z ?
C) O
rn 0
Uz
rn rn
:?
n rrn
rn -? F
= Oz >
rn
4i r
rn
? N
cP
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
b> 6l 6> J ?l
Csl ?l C9 - (?.?
O O O O O
O O O O O
N
U1
O
O O
+
O
O
O
O
O
+
N
O
? o
N ?
O
D
O
O
? o
I ?
D
c
O
+
U1
O
O
+
61
O
O
+
J
O
rn
U)
0 n
O TO
0 C1? z
z CJ? rn
rn ?
70 C)
n O
z z
O
v O
J
6>
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
6> 6> 6l 6> 61
O O O O O
c?
v
N
cu
v
I
D
N
03
c=r
N
Ul
O
O O
+
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
0 O
D w
? O
O
z
co
co
O
+
O
O
+
O
O
+
6l
0
rn
U)
/70
D O
-1 (j)
O ? z
z rn
rm
rn
D r
= zO D
v rn
rn
+ 0J
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
O N l? ? ?
O O O O O
N
Ul
CJ1
O
O O
O
O
O
+
O
O
+
N
O
c?
m
N
O
D ?
c? O
m z
z
l co
I D
D O
N +
4?
cC? O
c=r
O
+
Ul
O
O
+
61
0
/70
rn
CJ?
O C>
D Q
(J)
0U)71
z
6) rTl rn ::-
rn
D ?
_ D
O
O
U
m
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
CJ1 CJl 61 6l 6>
O O O O O
N
CJl
O
O O
+
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
CD
O
+
m
N
co
v
D
N
C
-j O
-Di
O
z
c?
co O
+
O
ct
O
+
CT1
O
O
+
O
O
+
0
70
rn
CJ?
O n
O
O z
z ' rn
70 n rn
r-n
D :::j lr---
= ZO D
70
7
rn
v rn
r
- rn
U
J
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
CJ1 Ul ? ? ?
J CD - (a1 CTl
O O O O O
O O O O O
ELEVATION (feet)
O
+
O
c? o
v +
N Q
I ?
co O
v z
_l cb
O
I ?
D +
? W
? O
c
O
+
O
O
W
O
N
CJ1
N
O
O O
+
O
O
N N N
CJ1 CI1 Ul
6l OD
O O O
O O O
N N
6> 6>
O N
O O
O O
I
S ?
0 0
v
I ? o
o
- ? o
c9
o
a
o
717
v
o ?
I
I li
I
I
i
?I
I
I
70
f71
U)
O C>
D Q
O 0 z
z & rn
rn rn
Dpi
_ 0 D
z 70
O
O
Co
co
v
N
co
v
I
D
N
c
ct
N
Ul
N
O
O O
+
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
CP
D
O
z
c?
(D
O
+
O
O
O
O
+
CP
0
70
rn
U)
o ?
O O
-j u
OU)z
z rn
rn rn
Fn n
D r
n O rn
r
= z D
70
7
rn
v rn
r
rn
C9 ?
J
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
CJ1 Ul Ul 6> 61
? m Co O N
O O O O O
O O O O O
(D
v
N
c?
v
D
c
ct
N
6l
O
O O
+
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
O
D ?
O O
z
co
CD
O
O
O
+
O
O
61
O
70
rn
U)
-1
On
D Q
O U z
Z 6 rn
70 rn rn
FTI ni
= O
70
O
O
N r
U1 6>
c9
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
? (Ji Ul CP Ut
0? O N -A 6>
O O O O O
O O O O O
CO
v
N
-C
c?
v
D
N
c
ct
N
T)
O
O O
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
CJ?
D
O
z
O
+
CD W
O
O
+
O
O
+
CJ1
0
T
rn
U)
-1
O n
O
i U
O 0 z
Z
rn rn
rn
D F-
z0 D
70
v rn
N rn
6l ?
N
6>
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
? CJ1 CJ1 CJ1 CJ1
Ca O N ? m
O O O O O
O O O O O
N
O
O O
+
O
O
O
O
O
+
N
O
N
v
N
D
co O +O
v z c,,,
O
I
D
c O
+
1N-
O
O
+
cs
O
O
+
6l
O
70
r-n
U)
-1
O n
Q
O Cn z
z ? rn
CP ::?
D ? rn
I?
C) O rn
= z D
70
O
O
O
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
-P -p CP Ut CP
O O O O O
N
CI1
O
O O
+
O
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
v
N
? O
D +
c?
co O O
v z
l c?
I Cb
D O
+
cQ7 O
O
U1
O
O
+
Q>
0
70
rn
OO
=1 u
Q Z
z rn
r rn rn
r
n O -n
= z D
rn
v rn
r-
N rn
03
Ul
ELEVATION (feet)
N N N N N
-A ? Ul Ut Ui
J CO - (? CIl
O O O O O
W
J
lL
0
J
_z
rv
Q ?
CD
-? z
W O
J
W W
z _>
Q
z
W
W
W
I
I
I
?I
I
n
0
x
n
W
LL
LL
LL-
X
I?
I
II
I
'
I I
I
i i
I
I
' I
I
?I
II '
I
I
w
J
LL i
? LL
X
i
I
O
x I
I
I
O O
O O
O
L9 L9 <9 L9
N N N N
O O O
n co
Ln Ln Ln
N N N
(4090 N O I VA91:1
O
O
N
+
O
O
+
O
+
O
O
V
+
O
N
+
- t?
x
o
0
O ?
+ U
N c?
o ?
? z
O
o Q to
+ ? 1
O ?
N _
+
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
+
L9
O
O
O
Ln
O
l9
+
O O O
O
?o Lo ?r m
Ln Lo Ln Ln
N N N N
r== r m r= m=== m === m m r m
N
W
J
LL
O
L.?
Q
_z
Q ?
J z
W O
W W
z ?
Q
z
W
W
R/
W
O
m
O
m
O
O
m
O
m
m
N
O
+
N
O
L
+
N
O
+
N
O
+
N
O
co
N
O
+
N
O
Lf)
co
N
O
m
+
N
NN N
O
z
O
O Q
(S)
N
O
N
O
N
O
m
N
O
+
N
O
G)
+
N
O
U
N
O
tl?
+
N
O
m
N
O
N
O
+
O Lf)
O N
N
X
w
rv
U
m
O
O
N
O
0
N
O O O O O O O O O O
N - O 67 co
l?
Lf) Lo Lf) Ln LC) LC) LC) I- IT -I-
N N N N N N N N N N
(4004) N O UVA919
APPENDIX E - PEBBLE COUNT DATA
Percent finer Than
O O O O O O O O O O
1 ?
ci-
v n
N
-C ?
c?
N
O
O °9
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
- - - - - ---------- ---------- ---- ----- - ----- ----
----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---- ----- ----
------ -- - - -
-- -- ---------- ---------- ----------
I
- - I
- II --
---- -- --------
----------------
----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- -------------------- ----
--- -------- ---- --
- -----
---- --------- -----,- -- ------ ----- ---- ----- ----
----- ---------- -------------------- - --- --
----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---- -------
--------------- ---------- ---------- ---- - -
----- ---------- ---------- ----- ---- ----- -- ---
----
----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----
----- ---------- ---------- ---- ----- ---- ---------
----- ---------- ---------- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----
----- ---------- ----------
- ---- --------------- ----------------
----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----
- ---- ------ ----- ---------- ---- ------------
i
----- ---------- -----
---------------------- ---------------------------------
----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---- y----- ----
------- -------- --- ---
CD
N
n
O
c
c--t-
N
U1
CD
CD
v
ct
CRI
O
r?
C-t'
-0
-z
I ?
v n
?j N
T ?
v ?
z
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
Percent finer Than
- N (IJ ? Ul 6l ?l
O O O O O O O
q 8-9 8-9 -09 -09 8-9
D Q0 0
O O O
-----
-----
---- ----------
----------
- --------- ----------
--------
- ------- ----------
-----'-----
- -
--------
----------
---
-----
---
-----
i
-----
----
--
- -----
------ --- -----
--
----
---
-
-----
---- -----------
--------
-----
-----
----------
1
---
----- -----
-- - -----
---- -----
----7-- --
-
----
------
----
- -
---
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----- -----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----- ------
-----
-----
-----
- - - - -
---- -----
-----
-----
-----
- -
---
----- -----------
----------
---
----------
--- ----- -----
----
---
---- -----
-----
-----
----- -----
----
----
----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-- -
--_-- -----
------
-----
-----
----
----- -----
-----
-----
-----
-----
- -- ----------
-----------
----------
----------
-----
---- ----
-----
---
-----
----
-----
-----
-----
-----
----------
---- -----
----- -----
-----
---- -----
------
-----
----
-10
Q
Q
C)
O
c
ct
O
O
Ul
N
N
c1-
C9
(t
O
rh
N
Year 2 Pebble Count Data Form, Riffle 5 - Newell Farm Mitigation Site
Material Size Range (mm) Count oo Cumulative %
silt/clay 0 0.062 4 4% 4%
very fine San 0.062 0.13 1 1% 5%
fine san 0.13 0.25 0 0% 5%
medium san 0.25 0.5 8 8% 13%
coarse sand 0.5 1 8 8% 21%
very coarse sand 1 2 2 2% 23%
very fine grave 2 4 5 5% 28%
fine grave 4 6 5 5% 33%
fine grave 6 8 7 7% 40%
medium grave 8 11 10 10% 50%
medium grave 11 16 11 11% 61%
coarse gravel 16 22 23 23% 84%
coarse gravel 22 32 10 10% 94%
very coarse grave 32 45 0 0% 94%
very coarse grave 45 64 0 0% 94%
small cobbl 64 90 0 0% 94%
medium cobbl 90 128 6 6% 100%
large cobble 128 180 0 0% 100%
very large cobble 180 256 0 0% 100%
small boulde 256 362 0 0% 100%
small boulde 362 512 0 0% 100%
medium boulde 512 1024 0 0% 100%
large boulde 1024 2048 0 0% 100%
very large eii , 2048 4096 0 0% 100%
bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil and Environmental Consultants, Pf
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E1
Year 2 Pebble Cou nt Data Form, Pool 5 - Newel l Farm Mi tigation Site
Material Size Range (mm) Count % Cumulative %
silt/clay 0 0.062 10 10% 10%
very fine San 0.062 0.13 0 0% 10%
fine san 0.13 0.25 1 1% 11%
medium san 0.25 0.5 1 1 % 12%
coarse sand 0.5 1 6 6% 18%
very coarse san 1 2 1 1% 19%
very fine grave 2 4 4 4% 23%
fine grave 4 6 2 2% 25%
fine grave 6 8 3 3% 28%
medium grave 8 11 9 9% 37%
medium grave 11 16 9 9% 46%
coarse gravel 16 22 23 23% 69%
coarse gravel 22 32 22 22% 91%
very coarse grave 32 45 4 4% 95%
very coarse grave 45 64 1 1 % 96%
small cobbl 64 90 2 2% 98%
medium cobbl 90 128 2 2% 100%
large cobble 128 180 0 0% 100%
very large cobbl 180 256 0 0% 100%
small boulde 256 362 0 0% 100%
small boulde 362 512 0 0% 100%
medium boulde 512 1024 0 0% 100%
large boulder 1024 2048 0 0% 100%
very large boulde). 2048 4096 0% 100%
bedrock *0
0%
?
Total Particle Coun Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil and Environmental Consultants, PE
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.EI
APPENDIX F - VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT PHOTOS
11
11
11
11
11
L
11
11
11
11
11
11
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 - Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 LE 1
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 - Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102111
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
a?
'J y +?IM1 $ Si M1 . E
4
;?? • ga •s d a ?J ? .A 5 i
r r r )?
t ^' gay
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 Year 1 (2009)
¦
n s «,' i?Y' 8 rr 1 4' *1
L
TppT{ 'I µµ lp ? Y'' Y
rT t "?Q T.dd1? ?7 ?5 ± ? ? J
J
I?
>?;. 4 ?. 1 r bf M?
z I .h $
a a. ryTt s ? ? ? C A"` {*? Y ' +8??! ? Jul ?? ?04
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 - Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E 1
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
6
t.'
ti
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 LEI
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
)t t ? ?. istl .. -v j
;i
s Id
-i
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Faun Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 LEI
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 Year 1 (2009)
ell ft M ?? :_.. ,,??,,•• A
r
y
? s
a .y a f A'' ' a ?
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 - Year 2 (2010) (Photo taken in December)
Newell Farrn Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 1.E l
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
f1.,?' .t^w^ ofj
? }?r ? ? fib".. ?c.. •;????,? ?ry?? .? ? ,jC 7
' i t { .. ?_b. ,? off a ? ? ?' • ?
! ? ? ?- r t? 4 Z k .'?
Avv
"P AS
K 10
t ? k \ f y{p iP N1 11 AlLf
c 4 .' K
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 -Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 2 Monitoring 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 102LEI
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 Year 1 (2009)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 -Year 2 (2010)
Newell Fann Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.El
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
?' r a t i 4+N! ?.
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 1.E I
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 Year 1 (2009)
??11?? "S 'U'?'XY
{s
' 7 1 F
7
t
?
ppi?
P ?
t 13?{t 4
-tA
Bank Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102 1.E I
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Year 2 Monitoring 2010
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Project No. 1021. E1
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 Year 1 (2009)
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 Year 1 (2009)
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 102I.E1
Appendix F
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 Year 1 (2009)
'r1r
41
. ,?1? s??;`r.;?r n._?.+I;sis. ?`•,?: M y .1?.:. .,,?'R". .w? .k`? ."?.+ •?? ".a ?? ?' .C:`; ^' `.?,?
Herbaceous Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 Year 2 (2010)
Newell Farm Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Year 2 Monitoring 2010 Project No. 1021.E l