090124_Inspection_20201027

e 'ision of Water Resources 61 rc
Facility Number ' 0 0 Oth
er n of Soil and Water Conservation
Agency
Type of Visit: erKmpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q'Ifoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: //' g.ge' Departure Time: "/ :3 D County: 3/Air.", Region: FIFO
Farm Name: J3 / rt�'f Form 3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Pry t-S1 ' I /C_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ( 75 '/-lA.r C' k Title: 721 �,• Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: rsyyl7 r/J
Certified Operator: (y L- 1 Certification Number: 9 .f 2 /
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
- Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine `' Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
seder to Finish 3']) 3_1 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca'aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIZEIMME - Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars MI Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part'of the operation? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 124o ❑ NA El NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9- - /01,vl Date of Inspection: / )•2 7.��
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? n Yes /0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? D Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /
Observed Freeboard(in): 7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes lElio ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1Z<To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Zv/?2U.zio-/44' cr_`!.
13. Soil Type(s): JUN �
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? es 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes H No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 12'10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check 0 Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - I�y Date of Inspection: /©? "---
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [alo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [l'io ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA (l NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [!]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lEr<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E(No El NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑/ NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Conunents(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
671irt, Wit) /9-27/DIA.7
/3" 6127 4e/nitielet.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: ��j>---,j0O/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /17—,,, � �
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015