090107_Inspection_20201217

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ° 9 - 601 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation r2- 2_ •
. O Other Agency :
Type of Visit: 440 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 19.111 I/0 Arrival Time: g',30 Departure Time: c. 0 County: BIq 1.0-1 Region: fi 'O
Farm Name: TVrn bU 6 d COMP ON Farr I IC Owner Email:
Owner Name: Ut Nob`erj7 Li v t n i 5t o n Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Guru c lnk'I "1 ` Title: WAG sp-ec Phone:
Onsite Representative: - Integrator: GM ith F
gQC. i PjI 4
Certified Operator: I® j LI�VI I Yvi b p ri
`j Certification Number: I(0 1 03
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current =Design Current Design Current
t.
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle t Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish [___ Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
X Farrow to Wean cA9f)0 9,111) Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca•aci Po•. Non-Dairy _
Farrow to Finish MIZEZE -- ° Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other, IN Turke Poults
Other I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ElStructure ❑ Application Field ElOther:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes IVI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes if 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 - 101 Date of Inspection: 121 ( 1120
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: eqs r west
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): cl 8 7
Observed Freeboard(in): 33 0
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IV No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes IV No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IV No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes IN
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D y ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application`� Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): erm Ac L®" 1-Gee4 COt , i h a4 f go beja1 15
13. Soil Type(s): Norf DJ K� •w Ii ,Q rotial , koa r1 t1
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes !1=] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes b No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey •
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ct - (pi Date of Inspection: 12117i 2.0
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IZI No 0 NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey El Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) �C
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes p No 0 NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
faro repoited a 1i18h free bored bit is of<
t-o4v ,
Neste- N" Iainbr-P Cer bvf- h4 q ram brf
Reviewer/Inspector Name: tiii,
®� eri V r �� r-�`,CJ ' Phone: �r�0— 303 V d I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Kakx, 01-- �rP g / �G� l ._
Date: h2 7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015