090094_Inspection_20201006

ivsion of Water Resources '/
e
Facility Number � �`" �� � 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ;. � 1 ,.. /}°
0 Other Agency f\�J' V
1
Type of Visit: ltompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: trxoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:Vz- Arrival Time: .bO Departure Time: /./,� County: 1,_ Region: FO
Farm Name: 3,/ 1 g d-- r" -;, Owner Email:
Owner Name: iA T ge ey., Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: /fed;ii. 11T7 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: fir-.-c-e- Integrator: 6./,- .�G� 71!
Certified Operator: /ryt a AI Certification Number: 1 ;7 49
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: ..
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
.,Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry . Capacity Pop '. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
t/r'eeder to Finish j} j Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca•aci Po•. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish IIIECESM=-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes LEI ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes L"J 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9- - � Date of Inspection: /69- (4
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No D NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes El<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EfiCfo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [2]o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q'N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidenceid of Wind Drift ❑ Application/ Outside of Approved Area
,�C
12. Crop TYPe(s): /'mide_e/rn e PLf/I r4cy_pe�()rn `/.d.�y-d/.jr /✓ -i-o
13. Soil Type(s): � //yam /, t, /Z7
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? - Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Erclo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check 0 Yes Errlo ❑ NA n NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. . Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E E1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7 - 9 Date of Inspection: /Z9/s�
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes b 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [!]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yeslo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes /['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ehr-c - m i e-A-ck i i— s�K�-dam
>-ebr,-,4 -5 —7L a-A [j sue- din 1
_6 g6,,--;:irk„,.74,L--J (597h_zez_f_s_)
07'"` It J v ✓opJ L& r`—„y z-' 74, f-eo ( D ee--sz2 2,7,
3-;;;-.M1/64 cf-fe'..sefL /17
i� 1 r1/` //t emu-Xa u hQ c)r
uJc.S az-''Li5.51,te i w 7fr.V.
'dam G/Vp rrs,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: _5/r ( Phone: 7 D,Y-0/31
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015