090073_Inspection_20201028

fi sion of Water Resources
Facility Number Fri - 3 I 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: c 1 itine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: /Q,:5 0 Departure Time: J/ 5j County: A.rjr,,-t.... Region:
Farm Name: cj -„t_ t ✓` ,9 I ' Owner Email:
J
Owner Name: �t1i,1 z / 3‘,7 jeDWY Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 5 zt &'i c Title: Fe ��r� Phone:
Onsite Representative: 2_ Integrator:
Certified Operator: � i /MO/z" Certification Number: _ .05
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 52047 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean _ Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca i aci Po.. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MEEZ11.111-- Beef Stocker
Gilts U Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars In Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes la No ❑ NA n NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9- - 75 Date of Inspection: /0--" --
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes IfK ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: / �--
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /9
Observed Freeboard(in): p2 �''3(
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require / Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): :As/`i72Lljm /459ucv`67',r_.,
13. Soil Type(s): A/2-5 05e ory /5/4 74
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Y s E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 'ZINO ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ENO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: / ' - 73 Date of Inspection: /P r
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [E]N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA 0 NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments'(refer to question#) Explain any:YES answers and/or any:additional recommendations or any other`comments
Use drawings of facility tobetter explain situations use additional,pages as necessi
ry)•-
7 .
La r i ( */1 oa' C 0c 51 'e 0--x t ---J06oe
71 S vn- corn ems- I7P 9 1- 7 ;r` Ter. 7
74- dY4.60,17-e-- /,_/7Lrr 42-(67
-t cO,„, , C�rayc. ce� Gv >
"Li°
e=e-C/7-e--
t'ef) Gl d- fi!l d" err
/K it
Reviewer/Inspector Name: p��,� -`. Phone:91" 363 Ofi7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /d O`er
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015