090072_Inspection_20201028

e1 ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: G1 ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O�outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I/f} f , -j Arrival Time: 7/VD Departure Time: /,7 f3' County: /5j .+mac. Region: J D
Farm Name: 506.4 ;✓'z-d" 11',,yrj Owner Email:
Owner Name: ��7&ii Cr et 1-5;;.— Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: e 3ezci, ,r r"ek. Title: 7".- 5 Phone:
Onsite Representative: j��� Integrator: ,pA ,-f;1
Certified Operator: z„�,, �- r�s 8�-►� Certification Number: /PE) ' ,3
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design. Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish A00 ®2,�D Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Elio ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 12rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 0 Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 •
2/1/2015 Continued

!Facility Number: 9` - Date of Inspection: G0"r-s--
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q" To ❑ NA n NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ElYes 0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen a hreat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ 1`Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside
of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 'b1 '!'1 /17 1; 5/J, r,,d /L /j3fJo - / vrr/-'r--,
13. Soil Type(s): ParNi<
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes aN ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 13- 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes la o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes lE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [!]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ENO ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er\To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
Page 2 of 3 • 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 7 I Date of Inspection: /V--:9l`'i
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E<Io ❑ NA -❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 214 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [l]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes E 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes I. /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes IZI<Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 121/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain,any YES answers.`and/or°any additional recommendations or any othercomments.
Use;drawings,of facility to better explain:situations(use additional pages as necessary)„ _
Acts mow - ¢_G ` l 1.w6A- D - /Jo"'r 4fr-eiv:
Reviewer/Inspector Name: c2✓�-exe_477"' Phone: 97p-3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %� 1 Date: / U—,-15"-- D
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015