090070_Inspection_20201217

Otivision of Water Resources KL �'I !
Facility Number ` ) j Q 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 1212.2.,
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q C mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 2 xoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
r--z
Date of Visit: / /, iiArrival Time: r/5 Departure Time: /0.'O i� County: 7/ni4bek- Region: T (J
Farm Name: 144T4') (70 27/Y1j� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 2144Qrtj44/Cp ,tt& I/ 6.- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: L.i V 7 Y c�AM vT. Title: I t om( S f'r-c' Phone:
: 7Onsite Representative: 5 �^�� Integrator: lj i/' �t/t�
Certified Operator: ( 1 d/j^ /(SS "—" Certification Number: [ 9J7)
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design` Current r
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity .Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
-Wean to Feeder A.76 O ,9D0 1' Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca•aci Po i.` Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MERIZEIM
Other •Turke Poults
Other l Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment %`
Z 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Arptelli.41 lett'a/J
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / c%' )
Observed Freeboard(in): 2 7 %Y ti
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes D'1`IO ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes El‹o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment, reat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Et/NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): TS tin a x 0 u r'ti`•";1
/71 13. Soil Type(s): p d<A, /[. ✓t 7 -fLtt 7 //,t4r:47-7-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 12Ks ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Er/No ❑ NA n NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 12<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /["No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers E Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Di No ❑ NA E NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ct - / I) Date of Inspection: /9-17
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ETo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 12r< ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
0.f rO•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �%e Phone: y l
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ( —/ 7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015