090065_Inspection_20201217

ogi Division of Water Resources MC I, 2 -Facility Number 9 - (p r) , 0 Divisionoof Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ('Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:�/``oZSZ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: maim Arrival Time: Departure Time: 10 7 County: it l Region: p ,
Farm Name: 1-,, C r J.e (l in f u 1 PN Owner Email:
Owner Name: e? l" (,r9'Q 11 1 1 CI 1 I Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 1 )
C`j Facility Contact: �L)1t) c, C11—u I Title: �,C c f i?( Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: cr i t- 1s--- rn-14
Certified Operator: Certification Number: ICI 1 (")1 )
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
r'
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine 'Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
4, Wean to Feeder 2_1i 00 7 C,,)(}- Non-Layer Daily Calf
Feeder to Finish - .T Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes [ ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: c:1 - ( /;f_-v Date of Inspection: 4 7 I j 1 I L/
v Waste Collection&Treatment i I
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): J L.
Observed Freeboard(in): ;jl(')
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes '❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)'
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 1/ ❑ Evid nce of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):• 1 e cm�]i!!C 1!tv 9t(/2 0
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1,31No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes \ \No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑�} No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 0 Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 NE
0 Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis 0 Waste Tran'fers 0 Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: q - r, .3 Date of Inspection: !2 1 17 1(LII
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Il No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
1\
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA 0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? \
\ 1
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Li No ❑ NA ❑ NE
\�
❑ Application Field I] Lagoon/Storage Pond I] Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Li Yes I\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility,to better explain:situations(use°additional pages as necessary).
r.
1, +INkAreii rP�
Is
f� ` ' 1 I,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,���l'; lJ`r���'��_, ,,,, I � I �,> �'��—�C��J,�"'� Phone: �1 6i C�;�(lr �'�
.,
p Signature: I��t;�As2 - J1\ tTY1'C 0I ,'G '-`° h Z I] 1
Reviewer/Ins ector v� Date:
Page 3 of 3 v 2/4/2015