090064_Inspection_20201217

9 Division of Water Resources B`tn lz j ZZ•
Facility 'Number 9- - (�� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation `T
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ( Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I7 ( VI 120 Arrival Time: `'I ►rj Departure Time: p;( ci County: SI ri ci�h Region: F
Farm Name: r C K `I r Owner Email:
Owner Name: ct,r)fI O n b 1oo Ke Fa r ins LLC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: r
Facility Contact: curt I c Bo l-Uh I (,K Title: I e C I I `�F,C Phone:
Onsite Representative: �q m Integrator: �� d
Certified Operator: }-y� r
p G rem C)I Cj� J I Certification Number: ra
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design "Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop:
Wean to Finish •Layer Dairy Cow
\,Wean to Feeder 0()O ;,('r)I111 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca s aci Po.. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MEMEIMMII-- Beef Stocker
Gilts U Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets _- Beef Brood Cow
EIRECE
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q No n NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes b No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: cl - (p tt Date of Inspection: 12_f 17/2_6
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): cl
Observed Freeboard(in): gd\
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of /
AcceptableI�� Crop Window ❑t Evidencej�-y of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): .r, mud/ V I `,7P ec
�}
13. Soil Type(s): Loan rl-1 c C nt �01-j, Ke a nc I I I I-e
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes NO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents `�
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 - (0I-j Date of Inspection: i 2i ] Z U
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes `l] No ❑ NA 0 NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA El NE
the appropriate box(es)below. `�
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes \ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Conunents(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Noe worK oh lggooh bg11SS Iooj Tood, C�'n�Inve. ()ti0 111
9
Reviewer/Inspector Name: : ,I Q, ;� %()/\ Phone: 9 I 1" V/LI' (/7/9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,k,t- 1 17 9/ c� - Date: I LI I f 26
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015