20201479 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210108

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20201479 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
What amout is owed?*
r Fee received
IT $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office *
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
Select Project Reviewer*
9800
Sue Homevmod:eads\slhomewood
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Riley's Meadow
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jeff Harbour
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail]
[phone]
Date Submitted
1 /812021
Nearest Body of Water
Back Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-V, NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
Longitude:
36.0517
-79.3422
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID# Version
20201479 1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
10116/2020
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf 52.39KB
A. Processing Information v
County (or Counties) where the project is located:

Alamance
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
P Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Ild. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
Ile. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
W Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
t^ Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
see attached
2b. Deed book and page no.:
see attached
2c. Responsible party:
Kirby Laforce
2d.Address
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
Carolina Land Group, LLC
Address tine 2
341 Kilmayne Drive, Suite 107
citY
Cary
Rstal / Zip Code
27511
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Kirby LaForce
3b. Business Name:
Carolina Land Group, LLC
3c.Address
Street Address
341 Kilmayne Drive
Address tine 2
Suite 201
city
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27511
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jeff Harbour
4b. Business Name:
Terracon
4c.Address
Street Address
2401 Brentwood Road
Address tine 2
Suite 107
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27604
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Riley's Meadow-AAF-Signed 12.31.20.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
('rf appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality I town
State / Rovince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / I3gion
NC
Country
Wake
3e. Fax Number:
State / Rovince / legion
NC
Country
Wake
4e. Fax Number:
111.35KB

Graham
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
see uploaded sheet
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1822 Cherry Lane
Address Line 2
City
Haw River
Postal / Zip Cork
27258
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Back Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-V, NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300020407
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
State / Rovince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The property proposed for the development and sewer line is comprised of undeveloped woodlands and farm land. A perennial stream partially forms the northern boundary and a small
intermittent tributary and two small wetlands occur in the floodplain of this perennial stream. Land use in the area consists of agriculture, mixed use, industrial and residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Topo.pdf
1.83 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soils(book).pdf 1.08MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
'0.5
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,200
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to provide single-family homes to the residents of Alamance County. This property is well suited for that because the residential development itself incurs
no wetland or waters impacts subject to 404/401 permitting. A sewer line that must be connected to the development will incur some temporary stream impacts (requiring 404/401
approval) and some riparian buffer impacts, but they Will be minimal. Also, an outfall from a SCM Wet Pond will incur some minor buffer impacts.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The sewer connection that will connect to an eAsting sewer line on the north side of the project will have to cross a small perennial tributary to Back Creek. Due to the grades needed to
make the sewer line work properly, the engineer is proposing an aerial stream crossing with the pipe resting on concrete piers. The engineer has completed the necessary flow studies
to identify bank full events in order to prevent damage to the sewer line. Typical equipment will be used such as excavators, dump trucks, grades, etc.
No indirect impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Rileys Meadow permit drawings.pdf 1.11 MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No 6 Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:

5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Jeff Harbour, Rhiannon Graham
Agency/Consultant Company: Terracon
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r- Wetlands W Streams -tributaries PF Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact * 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Sewer crossing Temporary Workpad/Causeway ffck Creek Perennial Both E;Jr�rfcet)]
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
50
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
50
3j. Comments:
Temporary impact from the work space necessary to place the sewer line on the piers. No excavation in the stream bed will occur nor will piers be
placed in the stream bed
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
r Neuse
r- Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba
r Randleman
r Goose Creek
R Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Sewer Line crossing Allowable
P
LIT to Back Creek
No
4,397
1,666
Wet Pond Ouffall Allowable
P
LIT to Back Creek
No
561
642
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 4,958.00 2,308.00

Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 4,958.00 2,308.00
61. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
Rileys Meadow permit drawings.pdf 1.11 MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The development has been designed to avoid all wetland and waters impacts. The sewer crossing was placed to minimize the stream crossing
distance and to allowfor a more perpendicular crossing. The SCM Wet Pond outfall utilizes a natural rock outcrossing to avoid any impact to the
stream channel
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
All state and local ESC measures will be strictly maintained and inspected throughout the construction phase. Temporary stream impacts that may
result from the placement of the sewer line will be minimized through the use of sediment curtains to prevent downstream turbidity and construction
mats may be used in the stream itself if necessary.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
No mitigation thresholds met
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
17 Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
I7 Phase II r NSW r USMP F- Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Graham
Comments:
The SMP for the site contains two Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs) which ameliorate the post -development 1, 2 and 10-year peak discharges to pre -development levels and
provide nutrient reduction. The SCMs are wet ponds designed in accordance with the Minimum Design Criteria (MDC) published by the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality.
u�
G. Supplementary Information u

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project entails construction of a single-family development that will incur no wetland or stream impacts. The sewer line to be connected to the
development Will incur temporary impacts from construction.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Terracon biologists performed a habitat assessment for the species listed for this county. Also, a NCNHP report was obtained and is attached as is an
IPAC report. No impacts to listed species are anticipated as a result of this project.
Consultation Documentation Upload
HL207195_NHP1mi.pdf 891.09KB
IPaC_ Explore Location resources.pdf 4.11 MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA EFH mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No

7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO and OSA map reviews
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO and Arc for Riley's Meadow.pdf 48.95KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The perennial stream which will be crossed by the sewer line is in the A/E Zone. The engineer will ensure all necessary FEMA and local floodplain
requirements are satisfied. No portion of the remainder of the project is in the floodplain
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA floodmaps
Miscellaneous v
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
owmers.pdf 54.96KB
Signature u
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jeff Harbour
Signature
Date
1/8/2021

Property/Site:
Address ofSite:
Parcel Identification Number (P|N):
Owner Information:
Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Property Owner Certification:
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers (Corps)
and/ or the North C8n}|in3 Division of Water Resources (N(}DVVR) to enter upon the property
herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination
oeeooiot9d with Waters of the U.S NVOTUS\ subject to Federal/State jurisdiction under Section
404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/Or Section 10 of the Rivera and Harbors Act of 1899.
Terr8ton.asdesignated bythe current property owner, iSthe authorized consultant t0coordinate,
schedule, and provide SUpp|mnnenba| information to both 3Q8nCigS in support of this verification
and/or permit application.
Property Owner Signature:
Date: MIN7.
TorramnConsultants Inc. 2401Brentwood Road, Suite 107.Raleigh, NC 28208-3008

r
V
-J
w
5 �/. r �t• •� g� J P
4... I /• q `��
•• � y Aiter�de � _ � \ \ \r�r-
Project Study Area
Location and extent is approximate. ��-
0 1000 2000 aIN
b
d
Feet
Source: 2011 National Geographic Society/ESRI,
L.%
i-cubed seamless USGS quadrangles (Mebane, �'� /
NC); Project Study Area approximated by ESI -
based on Alamance County Parcel Data. • '� ,
Disclaimer: The information depicted in this file is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for and is
notsuitable forlegal orengineering purposes. This -.• • 't
information presented is not for regulatory review and is
intended for use only byaProfessional Land surveyor prior
to regulatory review.
,T
IN
o �•, ��
_ 6m ,
611
614
e •a ,
i• .
Fear River Basin
• so. wvriaht:© 201
Project Location Project: HL207195
Irerracon Date: Jan 2021
Riley's Meadow
Drwn/Chkd: CW/JH
Alamance County, North Carolina Figure: 1
;\2020\HL297195_Rileys Meadow\Maps\Topo.mxd Date: 1/4/2021 4:04:46 PM

blavAuffelm

00V
ON
,\\
\0
NEVV/STO, AMJP.�A T#
:R
FOR SANITARY SEWER
MP;` StR—EAM'IMPACT: 50
OT,INI- AREA: 6Q63 S'
Z'ONE,,l: 43a7 SF
SONE,'2:16,66 SF
*PL CING PIPES ON PIERS, 0 s EAMBED DISTURBAN
NEW SSMH OUTkl 6,�A CONQ
too-YR FLOOQ523-51 RIERSW/.M'Ax
GROUND: 526.00
oSPANS O.C.
TOP: 527.50
---- ------------
INV IN: 524-46 ---- --
INV OUT: 5�4.26 -------
i - --- — - ------ ----------
- ---------
Al
....... ........
..... . . . . . .....
.......... .........
.... ............
. ..... . . . . . . .
...... .............
A. . . . . . ....
..... ...............
. . .. . . . . . .
....................
.. ...................
..V
... . ..... .
.... .................... .. . . ... . . . . . .
RE
...........
...........
FEEI
...... ...........
11FRom
........ .....
........ .....
........ .....
........ ... .
..............
. ...... ........... /
N1 Efl
F Ef�
........ ..
......... .
PLANS PREPARED BY:
B&F CONSULTING, INC.
2805 TOBERMORY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27606
PHONE: [phone]
LICENSE NO: C-2149
:E .
EFc
..............
. ...........
R N:: L* 11.0
..............
............. ..............
.............
.............. .............
.............. .............
............. ..............
............. ..............
............. ..............
............. ..............
............. ..............
.............
..............
.............
..............
.............
.............
............. ............
.............
............
. ............
............
. ............
. ........... . ............
..........a as
I
11
�5MH
TOP 523.38
INV IN 515.63
INV OUT 515.53
/RAISE CONE&
VOUTSIDE DROP
NEW TOP: 527.38
... ... INV IN (TOP)' 523-15
0 0 1 (DROP): 516.20
Lrl\ ST
A SH
'411
S SJ\AH
T611\529.39
INV IN 516.19
INV OUT 516.04
520
.53,
$6,
575
570\ bp
IMPACT LCTl
. VICINITY MAP N.T.S.
RILEY'S MEADOW EXHIBIT FOR
SEWER IMPACT
DATED: DECEMBER 31, 2020
SCALE: 1 "=60'
PRELIMINARY - DO NOT
USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

540
535
530
525
520
515
510
10+00
PLANS PREPARED BY:
B&F CONSULTING, INC.
2805 TOBERMORY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27606
PHONE: [phone]
LICENSE NO: C-2149
SEWER CONNECTIDN
— TIE To
EX. 18" OUTFALL
AERIAL
DESIGN
0
N
' M
D CO'
O
Lq
M LC} Ln
= O N
TNz,n
Zd�
gLnvLn
N ..
N Lo
_ Ln0z
~
O�
> O
�
U)
� ..
a�nz=O
� d
v)Owz
Z
—inz
Oa»
u i.-wE:
�—
a�zz
wwxwzzw
_10_'MEC
LO_KR_ES_TRAIN
DJ----
_ 223LF10"DIP@0.50%
--
------ --
----
100YRv. —
— --
----- — -
-
— .
FLOOD
ww
Xz
LU
UU
'4
4
YTYP
NOTES:
1. RESTRAINED
JOINT PIPE Will
BE CENTERED
DN CONCRETE PI
RS
CONCRETE PIERS
WILL BE MAXIMUM
40 FT. ON C
NTER
2. FOOTINGS
FOR CONCRETE
PIERS SHALL BE F
LACED ON STABL.E
SUBGRADE
APPROVED B
THE GEOTECHN
CAL ENGINEER.
OP OF ALL FOOTINGS
SHALL
BE AT LEAST 18"
BELOW GRAD
. STABILIZATION
TONE SHALL BE
SED WHEN
GROUNDWAT
R IS ENCOUNTE
ED DURING FOO
ING INSTALLATI
N (12" MIN)
+50 11+00 +50 12+00
540
535
530
525
520
515
510
+50
RILEY'S MEADOW EXHIBIT FOR
SEWER TIE TO OUTFALL
DATED: DECEMBER 31, 2020
SCALE: 1 "=50'
PRELIMINARY - DO NOT
USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

-- — - --------- *� --------
AZ
/ISCM #2
V
Vy€T POND
H.- M..
REN' SPACE ............
ol
.. .......... . . . ..... ..... .
-------------------------------------------
.. ............ . . .
RE E K .. ............ . . .
. ............
-- ---- - -�IEI
SED
-3 0'--P'ITO �'),'�AN
-A 1A
=RCINI
................
.. .........
.. ..................
. ... . . ... . ...................
FEET ..................
N 1'E:Fl"
�A. . . . . ... . . .
.. .... ..........
CFBE:�
.........
1 7 74 t
ST
19
.......... ol
80 ;pl
..............
...........
GE
G
/A
All,
gb:ii-/IM PACT #2 A'
.:j:: ivi ACCESS
�75
........
4 ...........
...
TH: LF
... 1203 SF
570
61 SF
642 SF
IMPACTLO TIOW
III
VICINITY MAP N.T.
PLANS PREPARED BY: RILEY'S MEADOW EXHIBIT FOR
B&F CONSULTING, INC. STORM IMPACT
2805 TOBERMORY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27606 DATED: DECEMBER 31, 2020
PHONE: [phone] SCALE: 1 "=60'
LICENSE NO: C-2149 PRELIMINARY - DO NOT
USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

Soil Mapping Units i:; :• • •.::•.....:•:::_.
Cd Chewacla fine sandy loam ;:{
DaC3 Davidson clay, severely eroded sloping phase .f i+'''"'`'' 1'''''" =. "==
t.•i;:':'.•.•;:.•.'.•�•11.• - �' is ::::.:::::::: �:;:'••-�:
:-'• v.r�Plllr'-'•J: i it ,••-,-.• � ..... _ - • •
DaD3 Davidson clay, severely eroded strongly sloping phase'r- r rt
DbB Davidson clay loam, gently sloping phase :;'" ''-= ''`'' rr'"'`'' '`'"""
DbC Davidson clay loam, sloping phase
DbD Davidson clay loam, strongly sloping phase
DdC2 Durham sandy loam, eroded sloping phase
GbC3 Geor eville silt clay loam, severe) eroded sloping phase
9 Y Y Y p 9 p ::: 'rs.. s ;;' ::• rr''s
laB2 Iredell loam, eroded gently sloping phase = -:: - '*�;_; :n,:,:;r• i :•r
LaW Llyod clay loam, severly eroded strongly sloping phase :_ rii ::' r i` �:`:',:'::: =:, ::r
Sb Starr loam fr;.:'' ; :•. �''`'
TdC3 Tirzah silty clay loam, severely eroded sloping phase
Project Study Area
r+ • • 'f,.rr-'• _ _:. ram.•::.'.-.:: � - - - -":-:
Location and extent is approximate. :'
0 250 500
Feet { -- ''J1•�•r•': --
Source: NRCSdigital Soil Survey ofAlamance } d• {f}XI: f'C� ------- ---- --- --- - -- -- f'''f"'•' ff"'' :ff'' ' 1"''
County, 1960; Project Study Area approximatedrf:. fr'r:•:: '-f' "• 7:•:•: _ : _ -
by ESI based on Alamance County Parcel Data. ? =r' '''} - ��`+}; , ••`: ::' ' :=:.•.• ` • ••
'fir �•. , - � .. :r. r:•:•.::•��_:::•:•:�: }:.'.•. :•:: "•:
•••_S';- •Sf;-...
r ri ri" +i,r'rrJl.'..:•. •.•• •r rri tiatiYrr
Disclaimer: The information depicted in this file is for - -'- •"' r+-tiYtir.'}�r'•:.•'rr'...............
informational purposes only and was not prepared for and is
not suitable for legal orengineering purposes. This -- r_ -•[;.
information presented is not for regulatory review and is -- r ` - ;r1+' a e Fear River Basin
intended for use onlyb a Professional Land surveyor prior
:r P
Y Y P :•i:• r.•` - - -
r:
e to rulator review. - --
9 Y Cyr- -- -- -
NRCS Soils Project: HL207195
Irerracon Date: Jan 2021
Riley's Meadow
Drwn/Chkd: CW/JH
Alamance County, North Carolina Figure: 2
D:\GIS\2020\HL207195_Rileys Meadow\Maps\Soils(book).mxd Date: 1/4/2021 4:22:17 PM

blavAuffelm

00V
ON
,\\
\0
NEVV/STO, AMJP.�A T#
:R
FOR SANITARY SEWER
MP;` StR—EAM'IMPACT: 50
OT,INI- AREA: 6Q63 S'
Z'ONE,,l: 43a7 SF
SONE,'2:16,66 SF
*PL CING PIPES ON PIERS, 0 s EAMBED DISTURBAN
NEW SSMH OUTkl 6,�A CONQ
too-YR FLOOQ523-51 RIERSW/.M'Ax
GROUND: 526.00
oSPANS O.C.
TOP: 527.50
---- ------------
INV IN: 524-46 ---- --
INV OUT: 5�4.26 -------
i - --- — - ------ ----------
- ---------
Al
....... ........
..... . . . . . .....
.......... .........
.... ............
. ..... . . . . . . .
...... .............
A. . . . . . ....
..... ...............
. . .. . . . . . .
....................
.. ...................
..V
... . ..... .
.... .................... .. . . ... . . . . . .
RE
...........
...........
FEEI
...... ...........
11FRom
........ .....
........ .....
........ .....
........ ... .
..............
. ...... ........... /
N1 Efl
F Ef�
........ ..
......... .
PLANS PREPARED BY:
B&F CONSULTING, INC.
2805 TOBERMORY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27606
PHONE: [phone]
LICENSE NO: C-2149
:E .
EFc
..............
. ...........
R N:: L* 11.0
..............
............. ..............
.............
.............. .............
.............. .............
............. ..............
............. ..............
............. ..............
............. ..............
............. ..............
.............
..............
.............
..............
.............
.............
............. ............
.............
............
. ............
............
. ............
. ........... . ............
..........a as
I
11
�5MH
TOP 523.38
INV IN 515.63
INV OUT 515.53
/RAISE CONE&
VOUTSIDE DROP
NEW TOP: 527.38
... ... INV IN (TOP)' 523-15
0 0 1 (DROP): 516.20
Lrl\ ST
A SH
'411
S SJ\AH
T611\529.39
INV IN 516.19
INV OUT 516.04
520
.53,
$6,
575
570\ bp
IMPACT LCTl
. VICINITY MAP N.T.S.
RILEY'S MEADOW EXHIBIT FOR
SEWER IMPACT
DATED: DECEMBER 31, 2020
SCALE: 1 "=60'
PRELIMINARY - DO NOT
USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

540
535
530
525
520
515
510
10+00
PLANS PREPARED BY:
B&F CONSULTING, INC.
2805 TOBERMORY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27606
PHONE: [phone]
LICENSE NO: C-2149
SEWER CONNECTIDN
— TIE To
EX. 18" OUTFALL
AERIAL
DESIGN
0
N
' M
D CO'
O
Lq
M LC} Ln
= O N
TNz,n
Zd�
gLnvLn
N ..
N Lo
_ Ln0z
~
O�
> O
�
U)
� ..
a�nz=O
� d
v)Owz
Z
—inz
Oa»
u i.-wE:
�—
a�zz
wwxwzzw
_10_'MEC
LO_KR_ES_TRAIN
DJ----
_ 223LF10"DIP@0.50%
--
------ --
----
100YRv. —
— --
----- — -
-
— .
FLOOD
ww
Xz
LU
UU
'4
4
YTYP
NOTES:
1. RESTRAINED
JOINT PIPE Will
BE CENTERED
DN CONCRETE PI
RS
CONCRETE PIERS
WILL BE MAXIMUM
40 FT. ON C
NTER
2. FOOTINGS
FOR CONCRETE
PIERS SHALL BE F
LACED ON STABL.E
SUBGRADE
APPROVED B
THE GEOTECHN
CAL ENGINEER.
OP OF ALL FOOTINGS
SHALL
BE AT LEAST 18"
BELOW GRAD
. STABILIZATION
TONE SHALL BE
SED WHEN
GROUNDWAT
R IS ENCOUNTE
ED DURING FOO
ING INSTALLATI
N (12" MIN)
+50 11+00 +50 12+00
540
535
530
525
520
515
510
+50
RILEY'S MEADOW EXHIBIT FOR
SEWER TIE TO OUTFALL
DATED: DECEMBER 31, 2020
SCALE: 1 "=50'
PRELIMINARY - DO NOT
USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

-- — - --------- *� --------
AZ
/ISCM #2
V
Vy€T POND
H.- M..
REN' SPACE ............
ol
.. .......... . . . ..... ..... .
-------------------------------------------
.. ............ . . .
RE E K .. ............ . . .
. ............
-- ---- - -�IEI
SED
-3 0'--P'ITO �'),'�AN
-A 1A
=RCINI
................
.. .........
.. ..................
. ... . . ... . ...................
FEET ..................
N 1'E:Fl"
�A. . . . . ... . . .
.. .... ..........
CFBE:�
.........
1 7 74 t
ST
19
.......... ol
80 ;pl
..............
...........
GE
G
/A
All,
gb:ii-/IM PACT #2 A'
.:j:: ivi ACCESS
�75
........
4 ...........
...
TH: LF
... 1203 SF
570
61 SF
642 SF
IMPACTLO TIOW
III
VICINITY MAP N.T.
PLANS PREPARED BY: RILEY'S MEADOW EXHIBIT FOR
B&F CONSULTING, INC. STORM IMPACT
2805 TOBERMORY LANE
RALEIGH, NC 27606 DATED: DECEMBER 31, 2020
PHONE: [phone] SCALE: 1 "=60'
LICENSE NO: C-2149 PRELIMINARY - DO NOT
USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
IN won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-13633
January 4, 2021
Katie Talavera
Environmental Services, Inc. (ESI) a Terracon Company
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE. HL207195; HL207195
Dear Katie Talavera:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
HL207195
Project No. HL207195
January 4, 2021
NCNHDE-13633
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID ScientifCommon Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
ic Name
Group WOb7servation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
i Rank
Butterfly 34484 Neonympha helicta Helicta Satyr 1980-Pre H 5-Very --- Significantly G3G4 S1?
Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name ner Type
US Fish and Wildlife Service Easement US Fish and Wildlife Service Federal
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on January 4, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q3 October 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-13633: HL207195
Noah Rd'�
O
sl—h- /7d
L'i1` +St
_ y
ow vews ewe
�I GYetn l�
`a -thyL, �4
�c
°h
s
G.—
Qcmpbry---
Re kin Ln
1
n�
-
NG
On9w
J Ga 51
0
-
��nnc
eC
� Q\NIXilly Laker
iycy �1,
a
January 4, 2021
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
Q Managed Area (MAREA)
1:24,604
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

1/5/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Alamance County, North Carolina
y
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t�. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 1/9

1 /5/2021
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
IPaC: Explore Location resources
o� 01?4*4.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 2/9

1 /5/2021
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
THERE ARE NO ENDANGERED SPECIES EXPECTED TO OCCUR AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 3/9

1/5/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandard conservation measures. pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON (IF A
..............................................................................
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
............................................................................................................
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
......................................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
.....................................................................................
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
..............................................................................................................
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
..........................................................................................
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 4/9

1 /5/2021
IPaC: Explore Location resources
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.,'
Probability of Presence (n) VAN,.
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 5/9

1 /5/2021
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey,, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN); This data is derived from a growing collection of survey,, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 6/9

1 /5/2021
IPaC: Explore Location resources
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects 3\OP
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 7/9

1 /5/2021
IPaC: Explore Location resources
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
� Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory}�
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or for very
large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at
this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 8/9

1 /5/2021
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
o� 01?4*4.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/RAP4TIFCXBCLHHFEEUDJ7EH4JM/resources 9/9

Riley's Meadow HL207195
Cultural & Archaeological Resources
Research conducted using the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
HPOWEB GIS service database on January 8, 2021 revealed that no previously recorded
historic properties are located within the project study area.
Research conducted by the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on January 7,
2021 indicated that no previous archaeological surveys and no previously recorded
archaeological sites have been reported for the project study area; however, one archaeological
site (31AM377) has been recorded within one -quarter mile of the project study area. The site, a
prehistoric lithic scatter, was recorded during a 1997 archaeological survey of 1,200 acres
performed on behalf of the North Carolina Department of Commerce. This site was
recommended Not Eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).

Riley's Meadow, Alamance County, NC
Property Owners Involved
Parcel ID: 152443 Deed Book/Page 0290/0585
SCOTT JANET L ETAL
2921 LENOX RD NE UNIT 205
ATLANTA, GA 30324
Parcel ID: 152456 Deed book/Page 559/439
SCOTT ASSOCIATES
C/O MIKE WHITE
5500 TILLEY LN
GASTONIA, NC 28056

ID#* 20201479
Version* 1
Regional Office * Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Sue Homewood
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 10/16/2020
Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Name*
Project Owner*
Project County*
Owner Address:
Jeff Harbour
[e-mail]
Riley's Meadow
Carolina Land Group
Alamance
Street Address
341 Kilmayne Drive
Address Line 2
aty
Cary
Postal/ Zip axle
27511
Is this a transportation project?* (' Yes (' No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
* 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
* Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes (-- No
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below.*
Project entails construction of a sewer line that will connect an e)asting
outfall to a proposed development. The added line will require a crossing of
at least one perennial tributary. No wetlands are involved and the work
stream disturbance will be temporary. No wetland or waters impacts are
anticipated to result from the actual residential development

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
10/26/2020
10/28/2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
2020-6-18 Riley's Meadow Sp 8_Optimized
4.94MB
DWR pre filing.pdf
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 10/16/2020