HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201408 Ver 1_401 Application_20210106ab ao / 1W
mmmmwa
150 9001:2008 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SCIENTISTS - CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
KCI4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 4(K1 - Raleigh, NC 27(X)9 - Phone 919-783-9214 - Fax 919-783-9266
ASSOCIATES OF NC
RECEIVFD'NC'F�'DWR
November 24, 2020
NC Division of Water Resources JAN 0 6 2021
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Non-Dlscoarge
1617 Mail Service Center permitting UM
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification: Nationwide Permit 27 & General Certification No. 4134
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Haywood County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern,
Please find the attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) and supporting documentation to apply for
a Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 27 & General Certification No. 4134 for the Beaverdam Creek Dam
Removal in Canton, NC.
The Beaverdam Creek Dam is a privately owned dam and is a complete barrier to upstream movement of
aquatic species on the Beaverdam Creek. As outlined in this application, the dam is proposed to be
removed to restore connectivity of aquatic populations, lotic stream habitat, and other ecological functions
of Beaverdam Creek. Other purposes include reducing upstream flooding and restoring streambanks and
riparian habitat.
The Beaverdam Creek Dam is of concrete construction and has a structural height of approximately 12 ft
and a length of approximately 65 ft. The dam is currently not maintained, and the normal pool water
surface elevation is at times affected by one low-level gate outlet that passes through the spillway section
of the dam and is consistently open. In the past this gate has breached, and the impoundment and sediment
has drained through the gate. Currently the gate is clogged with debris and flows are going over the top
of the dam. The project will remove and demolish the dam structure. If the natural rock and concrete from
the dam meets the proper specifications and is free of metal, it will be used for stream bank stabilization
or other in -stream structures. Excess rock and concrete will be taken to a certified disposal site in
coordination with the City of Canton. No mitigation credit is being sought for this project.
The project area was delineated by KCI Associates of NC on April 17, 2017. A preliminary jurisdictional
determination request is included within this permit package. The only jurisdictional water within the
project area is Beaverdam Creek for a total of 4781f. The jurisdictional request only covers the immediate
project area where disturbance is to occur, but the entire limits of the upstream impounded area were
assessed in April 2017. There were no wetlands within that area that would be affected by lowering the
impoundment.
f mplrx rr-(hrni'd Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE lb'WW.M.Com
Stream impacts are due to excavation of the dam impoundment. The stabilization of the stream banks in
the vicinity of the dam will involve addition of rock material and installation of soil lifts and live stakes.
Additionally, a total of 1,570 tons of sediment will be released due to the dam removal but will meet the
'de minimis' sediment condition.
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) reviewed the project and provided a
letter of concurrence dated May 5, 2017 that the project will have no effect on archaeological or
architectural resources.
The preceding information, along with the enclosed Pre -Construction Notification, Vicinity map, USGS
map, Soils map, Jurisdictional Features map, and Impact map. Additional attachments include Site Plans,
de minimis condition and other supporting hydraulic analyses memo, an Impact Map, and NC SHPO
correspondence.
A copy of this application is also being provided to the NC Division of Water Resources for their review.
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at your earliest convenience
at (919) 278-2514 or adam.spiller@kci.com.
Sincerely,
KCI Associates of North Carolina
GfiL'
i
Adam Spiller
Regional Practice Leader
Cc: David Brown, USACE
Erin McCombs, American Rivers
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE W"I.W.coM
Joe Sullivan
From: laserfiche@ncdenr.gov
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 12:02 AM
To: Joe Sullivan
Cc: amy.annino@ncdenr.gov
Subject: Pre -Filing Time Clock has been reached for Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal -
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal - 20201408 Ver 1
Attachments: DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for Beaverdam Creek
Dam Removal that you submitted on 10/6/2020. The ID number for that project is 20201408, Version 1.
Your Pre -Filing Meeting Request has now reached the 30 calendar days' requirement and your application can now be
accepted.
When you submit your application please upload a copy of the attached document in this email.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as
responses are not monitored.
ID#k 20201408 Version* 1
Regional Office * Asheville Regional Office - (828) 296-4500
Reviewer List" Amy Annino
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 10/6/2020
.......................................................-_........................._................._ __ .. _........................
Contact Name * Joseph Sullivan
Contact Email Address
Project Name *
Project Owner
Project County*
Owner Address:
joe.sullivan@kci.com
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
J N Powell Jr. Family LTD PTNRP
Haywood
Street Address
PO Box 10
Address Line 2
aty
Clyde
Fbstal / Zip CaiF
28721
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
* 401 Water Quality Certification - F- 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
* Individual Permit r Modification
r Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?
r Yes r: No
Sate I Rowince I Rxjm
NC
G-ntrY
us
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below.'`
The Beaverdam Creek Dam is a privately owned dam and is a complete
barrier to upstream movement of aquatic species on the Beaverdam Creek.
As outlined in this application, the dam is proposed to be removed to
restore connectivity of aquatic populations, lotic stream habitat, and other
ecological functions of Beaverdam Creek. Other purposes include reducing
upstream flooding and restoring streambanks and riparian habitat.
The Beaverdam Creek Dam is of concrete construction and has a
structural height of approximately 12 ft and a length of approximately 65 ft.
The dam is currently not maintained, and the normal pool water surface
elevation is at times affected by one low-level gate outlet that passes
through the spillway section of the dam and is consistently open. In the
past this gate has breached, and the impoundment and sediment has
drained through the gate. Currently the gate is clogged with debris and
flows are going over the top of the dam. The project will remove and
demolish the dam structure. If the natural rock and concrete from the dam
meets the proper specifications and is free of metal, it will be used for
stream bank stabilization or other in -stream structures. Excess rock and
concrete will be taken to a certified disposal site in coordination with the
City of Canton. No mitigation credit is being sought for this project.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
10/9/2020
10/26/2020
10/12/2020
10/23/2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
7. Beaverdam Creek Plans 90%.pdf 2.31VIB
PCK o*
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 10/6/2020
dna SPATE q
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action ID no. [Click to enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
DWR project no. [Click enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
Site Coordinates:
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.5420
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 82.8458
Form Version 1.5, September 2020
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 1.5, September 2020)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk ° are required. The form is not considered complete until all mandatory
questions are answered.
The online help file may be found at this link:
https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/O/edoc/624704/PCNo/`20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
The help document may be found at this link:
http://www.saw.usace.army.m it/Missions/Regulatory-Perm it-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Before submitting this form, please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as DWR will not be
able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form is used to satisfy 40
C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) which states "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall
request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5), all
certification requests must include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority
at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request to this Application.
Date of Pre -filing Meeting Request (MM/DD/YYYY) `: 10/6/2020
DWR ID # 20201408 Version 1 (If applicable)
A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located:
Haywood Additional (if needed).
Is this a public transportation project? '
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
❑ Yes M No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? '
❑ Yes ® No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
N/A
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: "
N/A
® Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Page 1 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
N Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1 b. Permit type(s)? ' ❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as separate attachments
and submitted with this form.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?'
N Yes ❑ No
NWP number(s):
27
RGP number(s):
Click to enter.
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: '
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit: '
❑ Yes N No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application? `
❑ Yes N No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
❑ Yes N No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? `
❑ Yes N No
1 i. Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes N No ❑ Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? `
❑ Yes N No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Requlatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 2 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
B. Applicant Information
1a.
Who is the primary contact? *
Erin McCombs (Conservation Director for Southern
Appalachia)
1 b.
Primary Contact Email: *
emccombs@americanrivers.org
1c.
Primary Contact Phone: * (###)###-####
(828)649-7887
1d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? * (check
all that apply)
❑ Owner ® Applicant (other than owner)
1 e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?*
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed: *
J N Powell Jr. Family LTD PTNRP, Viola Forga
Trust, David Collins Brooks, and Hope Andrews
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
DB 610 / PG 875, DB 926 / PG 768, and DB 1011 /
PG 1053
2c.
Responsible Party (for corporations):
N/A
2d.
Address
Street Address:
See attached response.
Address line 2:
See attached response.
City:
See attached response.
State/ Province/ Region:
See attached response.
Postal/ Zip Code:
See attached response.
Country:
See attached response.
2e.
Telephone Number: * (###)ft#
See attached response.
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-### #
N/A
2g.
Email Address: *
See attached response.
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name: *
Erin McCombs (Conservation Director for Southern
Appalachia)
3b. Business Name (if applicable):
American Rivers
3c. Address:
Street Address:
46 Orchard Street
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Asheville
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28801
Country
us
Page 3 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
3d. Telephone Number: ' (###)#lei#- (828)649-7887
3e Fax Number: (###)###-#### N/A
3f. Email Address: ' emccombs@americanrivers.org
4. Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name: *
Adam Spiller
4b. Business Name:
KCI Associates of NC
4c. Address:
Street Address:
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Raleigh
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
27609
Country:
us
4d. Telephone Number: * (###)Of-####
(919)783-2514
4e Fax Number: (###)###-####
(919)783-9266
4f. Email Address: '
adam.spiller@kci.com
Agent Authorization Letter:`
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw. usace.army. m it/Missions/ReguIatory-Perm it-Program/Perm its/2017-Nationwide-Perm its/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 4 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project: *
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
N/A
1c. Nearest municipality/town: `
Canton
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8657641379, 8657642381, 8657643535,
8657643400
2b.
Property size (in acres):
0.9
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
328 Champion Drive
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Canton
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28716
Country:
US
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point): '
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): ` 35.5420
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD): -82.8458
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: `
Beaverdam Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
C
water: "
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6el 25ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
French Broad
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located? "
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
060101060100
located:
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.mai)s.arcgis.com/apps/Pu bliclnformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3
Page 5 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
4.
Project Description and History
4a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application: *
he Beaverdam Creek Dam is an obsolete concrete dam. The dam is approximately 12 feet high and 65 feet long
spanning Beaverdam Creek. Two of the adjacent parcels are residential with maintained lawns and the third is in
early successional forest. The banks of the river are partially forested,but much of the eastern bank has been
cleared. Land use in the vicinity of the project includes low -density residential development and industrial use.
4b.
Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
4c.
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
[Click to enter.]
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
jClick to enter.]
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4d.
Attach an 8'/2 x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e.
Attach an 8% x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
0 acres
property:
4g.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
478 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
0 acres
property:
4h.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To remove the Beaverdam Creek Dam to restore connectivity of aquatic populations, lotic stream
habitat, and other ecological functions of Beaverdam Creek. Other purposes include reducing
upstream flooding, and restoring streambanks and riparian habitat.
4i.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The dam structure will be demolished and removed. Reusable concrete and rock (without rebar or other metal)
in the dam structure will be isolated and used for stream bank stabilization and in -stream structures. Leftover
material will be disposed of at an offsite location in coordination with the City of Canton. As indicated in the
plans, portions of the stream banks will be graded and stabilized with bioengineering and native vegetation.
The impounded sediment will be released over time due to the dam removal but will meet the 'de minimis'
sediment condition required by the permits. Please see the attached sediment analysis for supporting
information on 'de minimis' conditions. A variety of heavy equipment may be used for this project, including
track hoes (with a hydraulic hammer), front-end loaders, back hoes, and dump trucks.
4j.
Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or in ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
Preliminary JD Request included within this application
Page 6 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
Name (if known): Joseph Sullivan
5b. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
areas?
an enc Ag y /Consultant Company: KCI Assiciates of NC
Other: Click to enter.
5c. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed Concurrence
what type of determination was made? '
® Not Verified ❑ Unknown
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
Click to enter.
5d. List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
Click to enter.
5d1. Attach jurisdictional determinations.
Page 7 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Click to enter.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize
any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings for linear
projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
Click to enter text.
Page 8 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project
(check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands
❑ Buffers
❑ Pond Construction
® Streams - tributaries
❑ Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2a1.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
2g.
Site #*
Impact
Impact
Wetland Name*
Wetland Type*
Forested
Jurisdiction
Impact Area
Reason/Type*
Duration*
?*
Type*
(ac)*
W1
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W2
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W3
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W4
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W5
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
W6
Perm
enter
2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts
Click to enter. ac
2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts
Click to enter. ac
2g3. Total wetland impacts
Click to enter. ac
2h. Comments:
Click to enter text.
Page 9 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
Site #*
3a.
Impact Reason/
Type*
3b.
Impact
Duration*
3d.
Stream Name*
3e.
Stream
Type*
3f.
Jurisdiction
Type*
3g.
Stream Width
(avg ft) "
3h.
Impact length
(linear ft)
S1
Excavation
Permanent
Beaverdam Creek
Perennial
Both
20
251
S2
Bank
Stabilization
Permanent
Beaverdam Creek
Perennial
Both
20
406
S3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S11
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch impact:
Click to enter. linear ft
32. Total permanent stream impacts:
657 linear ft
32. Total temporary stream impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
34. Total stream and ditch impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
3j. Comments:
Stream impacts are due to excavation and stabilization of the dam impoundment. The stabilization of the stream
banks in the vicinity of the dam will involve addition of rock material and installation of soil lifts and live stakes.
Additionally, a total of 1,570 tons of sediment will be released over time due to the dam removal, but will meet the
'de minim is' sediment condition.
Page 10 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
4e1.
4f.
Site #*
Impact Reason/
Impact
Waterbody Name*
Waterbody
Jurisdiction
Impact area (ac)*
Type*
Duration*
Type*
Type*
01
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
02
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
03
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
04
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table
below. (*This does NOT include offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts
(ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
P2
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5g.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 11 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)?
* (Check all that apply.)
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
❑ Other: Click to enter.
Site #*
6b.
Impact Type*
6c.
Impact Duration*
6d.
Stream Name*
6e.
Buffer
Mitigation
Required?*
6f.
Zone 1 Impact*
(sq ft)
6g.
Zone 2 Impact*
(sq ft)
131
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
62
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
63
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
134
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
135
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
136
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
138
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
69
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
Click to enter.
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 12 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
The project will involve the removal of a deteriorated dam structure and the stabilization of adjacent stream
banks and the stream bed. Analyses were conducted to minimize sediment release during the dam removal.
Existing USGS gage data from similar systems was analyzed and hydraulic modeling was performed per USACE
guidance to determine the 'de minimis' sediment condition on Beaverdam Creek. Iterations of hydraulic model
runs were performed to determine the appropriate phasing and timing of the dam removal in order to meet
the 'de minimis' condition. Please see the attached memo regarding the 'de minimis' condition analysis. The
design also incorporates erosion and sediment control measures to minimize sediment release during
construction.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction will be conducted during low flow conditions and to the extent practicable equipment will
minimize being in flowing water conditions during grading and demolition activities. Typical sediment and
erosion control practices will be implemented. As much as is feasible with the conditions during construction,
river sediment to be removed will be isolated from the active flow.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required?* ❑ DWR ❑ Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? * (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank (Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
Click to enter.
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
Click to enter.
4. Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a. Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
Click to enter. linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
Choose one
Page 13 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
Click to enter. square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including the amount of mitigation proposed.
Click to enter.
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑ No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b.
If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact (square
Multiplier
Required mitigation
feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
Zone 2
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
Click to enter.
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
-F
El Yes El No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i.
Comments:
Click to enter.
Page 14 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
❑ Yes ® No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other forms of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual(https://deg.nc.-gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here:
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? '
El Yes ®No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? '
®Yes ❑ No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state. nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c. IS the project over an acre?
❑ Yes ® No
2d. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state-
❑ Yes ® No
approved local government stormwater program? '
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2e. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
M Local Government
(Check all that apply) '
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Page 15 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
Local Government Stormwater Programs '
❑ Phase II ❑ USMP
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.*
Haywood County
State Stormwater Programs '
❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
Project includes removal of impervious area (concrete dam) and stream stabilization. No Stormwater
Management Plan required.
Page 16 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
® Yes ❑ No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
❑Yes ®No
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
N/A
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),
DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules El Yes ®No
(15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes ® No
downstream water quality? *
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
Project is a dam removal and stream stabilization. These activities will not lead to additional development.
3c. If yes, attach a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis (.pdf) in accordance with the most recent
DWR policy.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? * I ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
No wastewater will be generated.
Page 17 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
® Yes ❑ No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.aovl) n
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
® Yes ❑ No
Act impacts? '
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another federal agency involved? s
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
Click to enter.
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? '
❑ Yes ® No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.? x
®Yes ❑ No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
❑ Yes ® No
Link to NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace. army. mONLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-
SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)? '
El Yes ®No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf)
5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
:1:
® Yes ❑ No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.? '
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdf)
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? "
The USFWS has visited the site. NC NHP database was consulted on 7/28/2020. A Biological Evaluation was
submitted to USFWS for concurrence on 9/1/2020 and is attached.
Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat? "
❑ Yes M No
Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity? '
El Yes ®No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation?
❑ Yes M No ❑ Unknown
k
Explain: Click to enter.
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Essential Fish Habitat Mapper. http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/index.htmI
Page 18 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
http://qis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
❑ Yes M No
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? "
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources? '
NC SHPO conducted a review of the project and determined no historic resources would be affected by the
project. See attached concurrence letter.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
A Floodplain Permit is also being obtained as part of the project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping Program
Page 19 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Click to enter.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
I. Signature *
M By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: * Adam Spiller
Signature: * Adam Spiller
Date: * 11 /24/2020
Page 20 of 20 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020
ATTACHED RESPONSES
B. Applicant Information
2. Landowner Information
2a. J N Powell Jr. Family LTD PTNRP and Viola Forga Trust
2b. DB 610 / PG 875
2c. Chris Forga
2d. Street Address: PO Box 188
City: Hazelwood
State: NC
Zip Code: 28738
2e. (828) 400-4400
2f. N/A
2g. Chris@forgarentalproperties.com
2a. J N Powell Jr. Family LTD PTNRP and Viola Forga Trust
2b. DB 610 / PG 875
2c. Sam Powell
2d. Street Address: PO Box 10
City: Clyde
State: NC
Zip Code: 28721
2e. (828) 517-2820
2f. N/A
2g. N/A
2a. David Collins Brooks
2b. DB 926 / PG 768
2c. N/A
2d. Street Address: 24 North Canton Road
City: Canton
State: NC
Zip Code: 28716
2e. (828) 367-8733
2f. N/A
2g. N/A
2a. Hope Harrison Andrews
2b. DB 1011 / PG 1053
2c. N/A
2d. Street Address: 550 Case Cove Road
City: Chandler
State: NC
Zip Code: 28715-9226
2e. (828) 273-4673
2f. N/A
2g. ebbyhope@yahoo.com
G. Supplementary Information
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5i. These percussive activities will be limited to a hydraulic hammer to break apart a concrete dam. This
hammer will be on a tracked excavator. This activity is required to remove the dam, which is the goal of
the project. This part of the work will last for no longer than 2 working days. This percussive activity is
located at the exact position of the existing dam. The dam location is included in the supporting
documentation for this project.
G
1
'lJOr,ntarry
zCL
we _
a
O
w
ao-
o rt
O!q Clyfle Rq d }
i , New Clyde HWy
C a*Olrna Blvd
6ti0� F —green
��'G�S, Far lq�7mit
Canton
Ruch St
V
O•
angst
N.l\
v�
a
X
a
C _
^atnrrt Mounts r
3
o r.
penland5� Q�uOh,% ^ `►
c EY s t e G`
P,sgao Schrw/ Rd
REEMMMEr`
N 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Figure 1: Vicinity Map
�.►� Project Area w E Miles Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Map created 7/31/20 Haywood County
K C I
s Image Source: ESRI
nsscx i gyres of NC World Street Map
'HI[KE iV Rr+
DSSa'
L c� ..
4-1
IARM(N RD
1
O
Z
p
�o
N C)P111A
..
0"
fiC�
Z
57
vi t7w
`
v•
Canton -�
N
1,000 500 0 1,000
Figure 2: USGS Map
Project Area
W E
Feet
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
K C I
Map created 7/31/20
Haywood County
s
Image Source: Canton
�sscx tares of nc
USGS 1:24000 Quadrangle Map
r—
O
0
OO
X
O
EN STREAM. IMP
X fA. 3+35.38 �—
V ;
O
O
+ 00-1
\Q11
O�
LEGEND
STABILIZATION (406 LF/0.06 AC) —
EXCAVATION (251 LF/0.23 AC) —
MAJOR CONTOUR
MINOR CONTOUR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
O
1kdo
BEGIN STREAM IMPACT
STA. 00+84.72
EXI TING BOTTOM
OF BANK ,
oo> kQp
O
\
•I
—15 —7.5 0 15 30
— LOD —
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
z
Z
0
V)
E
Q
Ll
IMPACT AREAS I
V
THICKEN
_CREEK I
,
,
0�- Z
�I o
PIGEON RIVER
WOODSIDE DR.
,
BE4�VER0� �
I
\
\
I
,
"`-�PROJECT
LOCATION/
)n
I� FIBE� ILLE RD.
it
SS
sa i
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
INDEX OF SHEETS
I TITLE SHEET
2-3 GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS
4 SITE PLAN
5-6 CROSS -SECTIONS
7-8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
DIRECTIONS TO SITE
FROM RALEIGH, TAKE I-40 W FOR ABOUT
260 MILES. TAKE EXIT 31 FOR CAROLINA
215 TOWARD CANTON. TURN LEFT ONTO
CHAMPION ROAD AND FOLLOW THAT
FOR ABOUT 1 MILE AND THE SITE IS ON
YOUR LEFT JUST BEFORE CANTON RD.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING DAM ANDKCI
THE INSTALLATION OF CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLES UPSTREAM OF THE DAM'S
LOCATION.
Prepared
AMERICAN RIVERS
BEA VEIZDAM CREEK
DAM REMOVAL
HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
in !A° 0/11ce of:
Assoc:nTls of NC
ENGINEERS- PLANNERS•ECOLOGISTS
4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD
SUITE 400
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PROJECTED DATE
FALL 2020
PREPARED BY
GARY M.MRYNCZA, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
ALLISON MARTIN &JOSH SITZ
PROJECT DESIGNER
A
AUGUST 2020
90 % PRELIMINARY PLANS
REVISIONS
STATE
KCI PROJECT NUMBER
SHEET
NO.
TOTgL
SHEETS
.C.
162002445
Ol
08
ISSUING AGENCY
PERMIT #
USACE:
N/A
NCDWR:
NA
-25-12.5 0 25 50
PLANS
PROJECT ENGINEER
,/1111l/I
�.�`Ct1AEL 'It.
BRED
(� �AGRI� RE 7+
• un�4�
0 %
is
,,% �
PE
SIGNATURE:
Prepored for:
American Rivers
ERIN MCCOMBS
CONSERVATION DIRECTOR
GENERAL NOTES
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE: 0.67 ACRES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ALL
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICABLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND
STRUCTURES TO MINIMIZE EROSION.
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
AND U.S. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE REGULATIONS.
DUE TO THE NATURE OF DAM REMOVAL, POST DAM REMOVAL CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE DESIGN AS DEPICTED IN THESE PLANS. UNDER DIRECTION FROM THE
DESIGNER, THE CONTRACTOR MAY ADJUST ELEVATIONS, STRUCTURE TYPE, STRUCTURE POSITIONING,
STABILIZATION METHODOLOGY, OR OTHER DESIGN COMPONENTS. THESE ALTERATIONS TO THE
DESIGN WILL NOT CHANGE THE OVERALL NATURE, GOALS, OR INTENT OF THE DESIGN AS DEPICTED IN
THESE PLANS, BUT WILL ALLOW ADAPTABILITY TO DEAL WITH ANY UNKNOWN OR UNANTICIPATED
CIRCUMSTANCES AS THEY ARISE.
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED CONTINUOUSLY, RELOCATED
WHEN AND AS NECESSARY, AND SHALL BE CHECKED AFTER EVERY RAINFALL. SEEDED AREAS SHALL
BE CHECKED REGULARLY AND SHALL BE WATERED, FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AND MULCHED AS
NECESSARY TO OBTAIN A DENSE STAND OF GRASS.
STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE NOT
OTHERWISE STABILIZED SHALL BE AMENDED AND SEEDED, TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS.
PERMANENT SEEDING AND GRASS ESTABLISHMENT ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION
AND ACCEPTANCE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE GROUND COVER ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS
FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING. PERMANENT GROUND COVER FOR ALL
DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION.
WHERE SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A PAVED OR PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE, THE ROAD SURFACE
SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY.
DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED OR PROTECTED
WITH SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEMPORARY
PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ON SITE AS WELL AS SOIL
INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR DAM REMOVAL
A. BREACH DAM BY UNCLOGGING OR MECHANICALLY NOTCHING DAM AT EXISTING
SLUICE GATE AND ALLOW WATER LEVEL TO DECREASE AND SEDIMENT TO
DISTRIBUTE WITH NATURAL RAIN EVENTS. LENGTH OF SETTLING TIME TO BE
DETERMINED BY PROJECT DESIGNER.
B. BUILD CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE 1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
DETAILS.
C. EXCAVATE DAM STRUCTURE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN SHEETS
AND AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER.
D. BUILD CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE 2, VEGETATED SOIL LIFTS, AND STONE TOE
STRUCTURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND GRADE
POINT BAR.
E. ITEMS B, C, AND D MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN A DIFFERENT ORDER THAN
INDICATED ABOVE OR CONCURRENTLY AS APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER.
F. STOCKPILE ANY EXCESS MATERIAL IN THE STAGING AREA TO BE TAKEN OFF
SITE.
G. INSTALL ALL SEED, MULCH, AND ANY PERMANENT STABILZATION MEASURES
THROUGHOUT THE SITE PRIOR TO DEMOBILIZATION FROM THE SITE.
H. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER ALL DISTURBED
AREAS ARE STABILIZED.
-TOP-OfBANK_4--------------- ____ SQUARE CUT—;
BUDS ---►
(FACING
UPWARD)
LIVE CUTTING
0.5" TO 2"
�IAMETER)
U)
w
BASFflOIN_4 IVE STAKE
vi
Q
ANGLED 45'
PROPOSED CUT
STREAM BANK
NOTES:
LIVE STAKES TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS DETAIL
AND AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE.
NO LIVE STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG INNER BAR LOCATIONS
OR OUTER BENDS THAT UTILIZE LIVE LIFT STRUCTURES.
LIVE STAKES
SCALE: NTS
2' SPACING FOR TOP AND
BOTTOM ROWS OF STAKES
1.0' MINIMUM OVERLAP
WITH UPSTREAM FABRIC
ON TOP OF DOWNSTREAM
FABRIC
2' 1.0'
0 0 0 0 0 0
3' SPACING FOR INTERIOR
ROWS OF STAKES w
it
0 0 0 >
3.0'
0
0 0 0 0 0
[n
o a 0 0 0 0 0 0
BOTTOM OF BANK
TYPICAL PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
COIR MATTING UNDERLAIN
- COIR MATTING SHALL BE BY STRAW AND SEED
700 GRAM
MATTING.
PROPOSED
GROUND
CV
1" x 2" NOTCHED
GRADE STAKE
TYPICAL SECTION VIEW ANCHORING
COIR MATTING
SCALE: NTS
19
E
a
z
0
0
a
(~/7 W 0
MCI 2 Z VN
LL w V)Q
aig
S �
W wU
zz
g 10
Wao
z
Z
0
0
co(�
z LL
Lu
w v
Y
w
W J
U O
W
w 2
Q
W
m
z
J
0
¢
0
x
F-
x
0
z
z
D
0
0
0
0
x
GENERAL
NOTES
AND
DETAILS
STREAM PLANTING:
LIVE STAKES: 1.5' TO 2' LENGTHS, 1/2' TO 2" DIAMETER,
PLANT 2 STAGGERED ROWS AT 3' x 3' SPACING, RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS
BLACK WILLOW SALIX NIGRA OBL
SILKY WILLOW SALIX SERICEA OBL
SILKY DOGWOOD CORNUS AMOMUM FACW
ELDERBERRY SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS FAC
INSTALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS
OF THE SOIL LIFT AS NEEDED
FOR THE DESIRED HEIGHT.
SEE TYPICAL CROSS -SECTIONS
FOR HEIGHT OF BANK. FINISH
THE SOIL LIFT BY GRADING THE
TOP LIFT TO MATCH THE
FLOODPLAIN/BENCH ELEVATION.
Y z USE BURLAP BACKED HEAVY COIR
m (900 GRAM) MATTING ON ALL LIFTS.
BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE GROWING
0 MATERIAL.
3' MINIMUM
r
_
INSTALL LIVE WILLOW WHIPS BETWEEN
SOIL LIFTS WITH APPROX. 1 FOOT OF
PLANT MATERIAL EXPOSED. MINIMUM
I— I LENGTH OF CUTTINGS SHALL BE 4',
WITH A MINIMUM STEM DIAMETER OF
1/2". DISTANCE BETWEEN CUTTINGS
I— SHALL BE 4". FILL VOIDS WITH
SUITABLE SOIL.
STONE BASE
III I__ I I III D
FILTER FABRIC
BEHIND AND ON
TOP OF RIPRAP
MIX
5 O O O O O O O O BASEFLOW
00 00 0 0 O 000
o Q O
o(1p�� oOCJ
o941�
RIPRAP MIX:
� �q50
g�OO��OOg���OCCOJJ �� ELEVATION OF
40% - CLASS 1 RIPRAP
60% CLASS 2 RIPRAP
O O O Oin
090 W 00 00�0�� 00�0 O } BOTTOM OF
-
CHANNEL
'X' - SEE TABLE _
r
COEFFICIENT
BEAVERDAM CREEK
X
5.0 - 6.0'
Y1
1.0 - 1.5'
Y2
0.5'
Y3
4.0'
NOTES:
-USE 1.5'x1"x2" WOODEN STAKES ON 1' CENTERS.
-STAKES SHALL HAVE A'ROOFING' NAIL AT TOP TO
KEEP FABRIC FROM SLIPPING OFF.
STONE TOE WITH LIVE LIFT
NOTES:
NO SINGLE LIVE STAKING SPECIES
SHALL COMPOSE MORE THAN 40% OF THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF LIVE STAKES TO BE INSTALLED.
LIVE STAKES WILL NOT BE INSTALLED ALONG LIVE
^
LIFT STRUCTURES UNLESS THEY ARE INSTALLED
'�Y)
OUTSIDE OF THE DORMANT SEASON. IF LIVE LIFTS ARE
INSTALLED OUTSIDE OF THE DORMANT SEASON, EACH
N
zo
LIFT WILL HAVE A ROW OF LIVE STAKES INSTALLED
0
ON 1' SPACING STAGGERED WITH THE LIVE STAKES
>
ON ADJACENT LIFTS.
DO NOT PLANT ON INSIDE MEANDER BENDS.
DESIGNED BEGIN -
RIFFLE ELEVATION
DESIGNED POOL
ELEVATION-7
TAPER RIFFLE MATERIAL
INTO FINAL GRADE
COMING OUT OF POOL
4' THICK
RIPRAP MIX
40% - CLASS 1 RIPRAP
40% - CLASS 2 RIPRAP
20% - BOULDERS
ADD BOULDERS TO BREAK UP
FLOW AND MAINTAIN
INTEGRITY OF THE STRUCTURE.
:-SIGNED END
FFLE ELEVATION
DESIGNED POOL
ELEVATION
FOOTER BOULDERS ONLY USED
IN BOULDER ARCHES
SECTION B-B' (LONGITUDINAL VIEW]
SEE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
z
FOR CHANNEL DEMENSIONS
z
CL
m
gY
OQ
2Y
OQ
m
OLL
HO
m �_m
OLL
HO
- - - - -
`
- -
m0
m0
STABILIZE BANKS WITH
700 GRAM COIR----_____�``
MATTING AS NEEDED
°db
o
RIPRAP SLOPE TO
o � o
1/2 BANK HEIGHT
- 4' THICK
4' THICK
BANK RIPRAP MIX
IN -CHANNEL RIPRAP MIX
50% - CLASS 1 RIPRAP
40% - CLASS 1 RIPRAP
50% - CLASS 2 RIPRAP
40% - CLASS 2 RIPRAP
20%- BOULDERS
B
I
NOTES:
- TYPICAL BOULDER SIZE = 4x3x2
- SEE CROSS-SECTION SHEETS FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS.
- SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS FOR BEGIN AND END OF RIFFLE.
SECTION A -A' (CROSS-SECTION VIEVVJ
A
10' TYPICAL
TOP
OF BANK
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 o
BOTTOM
-----
-- a— o -o a--.—o o—
�o Q
0 0
0�0 °�'o
--Q - o—o - -- o --- o o
OF BANK
cn
°
o °
o oo�000•°
0 0'0
o o
a
°oo,aOp.o
o•o • o 0 0 0
o, ° o
° �° o•a a ,00•o °o a o•o 000
0 0 °,
o.o."o o o ° o•o'er
o, o° ° °,o° o, o°.oe ° o o'a
FLOW
-°
°p ° O c °, ° °'o o O c
° ° °P�.
° °° �� o o ° °° 2� o � ° °O
•o .o o
.o o. .o
o.
.o o
TOP
H
VARIES
PLAN VIEW
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
Ur orlrvn
E
4
0
I� Z z D
W 0a
O N <0iK
J
0 0
s W
`3 w w cai
_ 'I
W
J z0
a 01
�
u J uj
z LL
W
a
z
J
0
Y �
W U
W J
x
F
2 2 z
x z
Lu 2 o
W 0
m 0
a
x
I UAIh: AUGUST 2020 1
GENERAL
NOTES
AND
DETAILS
SCALE: NTS
SCALE: NTS
SHEET
LEGEND
Cie
ss
I
I
— ss
EXISTIN
OF BANK
eox c��nr
soxsox c�i_
eox c-!
BEGIN CONSTRUC
RIFFLE 2
INSTALL ROCK WEDGE
ON A 5-7% SLOPE BEGINNING v
AT END OF RIFFLE. TIE INTO
1/4 BANK HEIGHT�/
TEMPORARY ROCK X�
PAD FOR DAM
BREACH 5
h `J
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
ss (PRIVATE DRIVE)
—�— ss ss
G T P� �
Q/
0
0
+ CUT EXISTING 18" CORREGATED
04 PLASTIC PIPE T FROM REPAIRED
BANK FACE.
O
POINT BAR GRADING
w
.f�
ss�
VEGETATED SOIL LIFT
ARMORED BANK
BADE POINT BAR TO INCREASE
QOLCROSS-SECTIONALAREA
ANp CREATE SMOOTH TRANSITION
BE EN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
\ s
s
EXISTING STRUCTURE
\
SANITARY SEWER ss— ss
\
SINGLE TREE
o�
' BECeINCONSTRUCTED
RIFF4 1
MAJOR CONTOUR
\ \
-2�57-12.5 0 25 50
\ ss
MINOR CONTOUR
u
ss O�
REMOyE ISTIN DAM - SEE
CONST CTION SEQUENCE
ON SHE T 02 ss
ss
EX�G BO O
OF BANK
i ••� 55
BROW S�RE�j EXISTING
BOTTOM \ss ss�ss—s
EXISTING TOP
---OF BANK
................................................................................................................................................................................. ........... I .............. .............. I ............ ..........
—
E) ING........:.......... ......PROPOSED ........... ... o N
................................ ..........
GI&OU415'
�3`. ;..
............ ...... ........... ........ ........... ........... ............................. ...-....... ........... ........... ........... ... 4- Z.... ........... ........... .W W ........ ........... ........... ........... ...........
...� . . ......--- ........... .... .�------� ..... ........... ........... ........... �Q......................................tm------.. ........... ........... .-----..... ........... 2575
2575 _--- ----- Q�
J W
N�. — — — __ — Q J.....:. ........... Q p ........ .............................
........... ........... ... ,'�.. T, ......... ........... ——.T.—.��....._ . g a ........ ................................
t7r WW
........... ... + Z .. .. .� �. .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... .1 N ........ ........... ........... ........... ...........
... .... . . . . . . . .. . . .
2570 :.......... = 8 0----=--------------- o "---------------------------- ........... ..---•--. `�--------- . ' ... r ..
a p 2570
00+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
t W p J
W
.....................
o
�G
..................
......... ........... ......... ........
DAM
........... ..........
OIBE'NREMOVE
04
............ ....�
............ .. .+
N ...-.......... ........... ...........
... ........... ........... ...........
........... ........... ........... ........... ..............................
........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
........... .... ........... ...........
........... ........... ..... �..`.. ........... ...........
.........-- ........... ........... ........... ...........
........... ........... ........... ........... ............
2575
Qa...
Z
........... ........... ........... ...........
........... ........... .....�..1.. ........... ...........
........... ........... ........ ........... ...........
2575
o
0
N
w—
v~ O
N :
...............a �-•---•---................
... �. _ ...:.... .... ... ... .
GROUND
S TR EAiVI
..............:. ......... ...... ........... rn
rn
, .......................
am .......... .... .. ...........
I
... ........... ........... .......... ............
Z Q
............ ....... -. -[-...
......... ..... ........... .%N
C
z . ....
.......... ......... .�........ �.. ....fi t... ...........
�cp�
........... ........... ........ ... ..........- ............
J.......:
............. .. ........... 01 �.� .. ... ..
�n
T ................
.. .. - - - - - -
-�
O
.......... p N .........../........... .fit? ...........
_--
........... ........... ........ ... ............--.........
2570
2570 ��
rQ
—� mry.
Qd'
� a
: : +
:-•• :............ N
"
Z .......
J.....................
w
Q M O
�------- ..:.... ar=
........... _ _ ....... ........... ........-..
ww
o
p ...........................
....... .. .. .. ... .. ..
...........d~tl >............:............. k......� j ....:..............
.............. _ _ _ ........... ........... ...........
I
Q
: :
..........................................
...........................
;
. ..
............... .....
..... . . ....
.. ......... ........... ��....; J .� .�
.—... erf .�.. .. ................ \•` —•— .as—.�....:..............
2565 a
_
....... ..................................
W :.........
.................... .... ..
.. ...
.. ..... .:-�`
2565
W..
2560
...................................... ........................... .........
..........................................................................
.... .......... ........
.............................................:............... :..................
..............................
............ ...............
.... ...----------
�1
`1
W
W J
(Y Q
U �
O
Q Lj
� W
w
>Q
w
c0
Q
z
J
0
Q
U
_
F-
0
z
F}-
z
O
U
0
0
Q
SITE PLAN
2+00
2+50
3+00
3+50
4+00
OF
2585
2580
2575
2570
2585
2580
2575
2570
2565
2585
2580
2575
2570
2565
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
BEGIN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE 1
00+84.72
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20
END CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE 1
01 +31.31
-40 -30 -20 -10 0
POOL
01 +93.00
LEGEND
PROPOSED GROUND
--- EXISTING GROUND 2017
2585
2580
2575
2570
2585
2580
2575
2570
256530
5
10 20 30
9�4� Illi.
8�
Vg
Ir
�Jdi{ w W6
Z =_
Z W,
a LL z
Z �w
2585
W
2580
2575
2570
2565
40
Q
z
J
O
Y �
w Q
w J U
0� Q =
F-
2 o
ow
rr
0
wIn o
Co 0
0
Q
CROSS -
SECTIONS
--------- THALWEG ELEVATION 2020
(SHEET 05 OF 08 1
ss
TEMPORARY STOCK PILE;
EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY
TO BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN
REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
(SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 08) 00-1
ss
\ ss
\ss�O
ss
ti O�
TEMPORARY STAGING AREA o
E)
I
i
i
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
ss (PRIVATE DRIVE)
ss
IG DAM 0
REMOVED
TEMPORARY STOCK PILE;
EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY
TO BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN
REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
(SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 08) --1
`oa
e BOX CULVERT -� [0D
a �J
BOX CULVERT LOD
CONSTRUCTION
BEPv�RDPM S/
SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. IT IS THE INTENT OF THESE PLANS THAT AS SOON AS AN AREA OF GRADING IS COMPLETE IT
SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES DESCRIBED
IN THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE, AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, THE AMOUNT
OF THE AREA THAT IS DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EVERY REASONABLE PRECAUTION THROUGHOUT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION. EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROJECT PLANS, NORTH CAROLINA SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL GUIDELINES AND AS
DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER,
3. IN THE EVENT OF A STORM, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OR
PROTECTION OF ANY EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, MATERIALS OR OTHER ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE
THE WORK THAT COULD BE AFFECTED BY STORMWATER.
4. EACH SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE WILL BE REMOVED AFTER ALL WORK IN THE CORRESPONDING
CONSTRUCTION PHASE HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND ADEQUATE PERMANENT GROUND COVER HAS
BEEN RE-ESTABLISHED ON THE DISTURBED AREAS, AS DETERMINED BY THE DESIGNER.
5. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS PROVIDE THE
ONLY ACCESS POINTS INTO THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. NO ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINTS SHALL
BE USED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE DESIGNER.
6. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FOR
LATER USE AS FILL MATERIAL. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE LOW SIDE OF ANY
TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SPOIL AND TOPSOIL PILES. THESE SPOIL PILES SHALL ALSO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED FOR VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WITHIN 7 DAYS THAT THEY ARE CREATED. ALL SPOIL
MATERIAL SHALL STAY ON THE SITE AND SHALL NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
WITHOUT DESIGNER APPROVAL.
7. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND FUNCTIONAL
OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF PRODUCING RAIN EVENT AND/OR AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK.
ANY NEEDED MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL MEASURES
AS DESIGNED. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM CONTROL MEASURES WHEN THEY
REACH APPROXIMATELY 50% OF THEIR FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY. THESE MEASURES SHALL BE REPAIRED
IF DISTURBED DURING MAINTENANCE. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AND
MULCHED, AS NECESSARY, TO PROMOTE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION COVER.
8. ALL EXCESS WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED FACILITY OR SITE.
(15A NCAC 0413.0110)
VOID
-25-12.5 0 25 50
� lie
I
m'a
o�
TEMPORARY STOCK PILE;
EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY
TO BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN
REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
(SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 08)
ss
ss
\ss
55
TEMPORARY STAGING AREA
SEDIMENTATION & EROSION
CONTROL PLAN LEGEND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE .•••••..••....••..
_LOD-
SILT FENCE........... ................
.... . -SF-
STAGING AREA ... ....
....... - .
TEMPORARY STOCK PILE ..................
O
SANITARY SEWER ..............
• . • • .... • . SS G) 5S
SINGLE TREE ..............................
0
EXISTING STRUCTURE •................
...
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ...............
�CR
SEEDING AND PLANTING NOTES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE FOLLOWING SEED/FERTILIZER
MIX IN SEEDING ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.
ALTERNATIVE SEED MIXES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS APPROVED BY
DESIGNER.
TEMPORARY SEED MIX
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15 - AUGUST 15)
GERMAN MILLET ...... SETARIA ITALICA ....... 20 LBS / ACRE
BROWNTOP MILLET ... UROCHLOA RAMOSA ... 20 LBS / ACRE
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 - MAY 15)
RYE GRAIN............ SECALE CEREALE ........ 120 LBS /ACRE
9
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15 - AUGUST 15)
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
SPECIES
% OF MIX
LBS/ACRE
VIRGINIA WILDRYE - ELYMUS VIRGINICUS (FACW)
15
4.6
BIG BLUESTEM - ANDROPOGON GERARDII (FAC)
8
2.3
SWITCHGRASS - PANICUM VIRGATUM (FAC)
11
3.3
AUTUMN BENTGRASS - AGROSTIS PERENNANS (FACU)
11
3.3
BLACK-EYED SUSAN - RUDBECKIA HIRTA (FACU)
8
2.3
LANCELEAF COREOPSIS - COREOPSIS LANCEOLATA (FACU) 8
2.3
SOFT RUSH - JUNCUS EFFUSUS (FACW)
3.5
1.1
LITTLE BLUESTEM - SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM (FACU)
3.5
1.1
INDIAN GRASS - SORGHASTRUM NUTANS (FACU)
3.5
1.1
EASTERN GAMMA - TRIPSACUM DACTYLOIDES (FACW)
3.5
1.1
RYE GRAIN - SECALE CEREALE (N/A)
25
7.5
TOTALS 100 30
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 - MAY 15)
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
SPECIES
% OF MIX
LBS / ACRE
VIRGINIA WILDRYE - ELYMUS VIRGINICUS (FACW)
15
4.6
BG BLUESTEM - ANDROPOGON GERARDII (FAC)
8
2.3
SWITCHGRASS - PANICUM VIRGATUM (FAC)
11
3.3
AUTUMN BENTGRASS- AGROSTIS PERENNANS (FACU)
11
3.3
BLACK-EYED SUSAN - RUDBECKIA HIRTA (FACU)
8
2.3
LANCELEAF COREOPSIS - COREOPSIS LANCEOLATA (FACU)
8
2.3
SOFT RUSH - JUNCUS EFFUSUS (FACW)
3.5
1.1
LITTLE BLUESTEM - SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM (FACU)
3.5
1.1
INDIAN GRASS - SORGHASTRUM NUTANS (FACU)
3.5
1.1
EASTERN GAMMA - TRIPSACUM DACTYLOIDES (FACW)
3.5
1.1
RYE GRAIN - SECALE CEREALE (N/A)
25
7.5
TOTALS 100 30
FERTILIZER _ 750 LBS / ACRE
LIMESTONE . 2000 LBS / ACRE
FERTILIZER SHALL BE 10-10-10 ANALYSIS. UPON SOIL ANALYSIS
A DIFFERENT RATIO OF FERTILIZER MAY BE USED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
THE SEEDBED SHALL BE COMPRISED OF LOOSE SOIL AND NOT COMPACTED. THIS MAY
REQUIRE MECHANICAL LOOSENING OF THE SOIL. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHOULD FOLLOW
THE FERTILIZER AND LIMING DESCRIPTION IN THE ABOVE SECTIONS. FOLLOWING SEEDING,
MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW THE BELOW APPLICATION METHODS AND AMOUNTS. AREAS
CONTAINING SEVERE SOIL COMPACTION WILL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES.
MULCHING
SEEDED AREAS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY SPREADING STRAW MULCH UNIFORMLY TO
FORM A CONTINUOUS BLANKET (75% COVERAGE = 2 TONS/ACRE).
NOTE: FERTILIZER IS ONLY TO BE APPLIED ONCE. IF TEMPORARY SEED AND FERTILIZER IS
APPLIED PRIOR TO PERMANENT SEED, THEN FERTILIZER SHALL NOT BE APPLIED WITH THE
PERMANENT SEED.
9
c
m
E
4
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN
07
ME
(1.
LP
R' MAX
1 rIL 1 Gf'\ FMUp 1%1 1
1
SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE
1. INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES WEEKLY
FILTER FABRIC -
AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT.
COMPACTED FILL-
2. SHOULD FABRIC TEAR, DECOMPOSE,
OR IN ANY WAY BECOME INEFFECTIVE,
REPLACE IT IMMEDIATELY.
— —
3. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS
=III -I I (—
PROMPTLY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
EXTEND FABRIC
STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN
INTO TRENCH
AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE
FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID
UNDERMINING FENCE DURING
CLEANOUT.
4. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND
UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AFTER
THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA
HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED,
INSPECTED AND APPROVED. BRING
THE DISTURBED AREA TO GRADE
AND STABILIZE AS DESCRIBED IN THE
EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
SILT FENCE DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
STEEL P
9
} , STOCKPILED
i��YYYYv<< y�{max �/i Y EARTH
> eT e�xiY��l {
,gF\ < SILT FENCE
SF
---------------
190--------------
NOTES:
TEMPORARY SEEDING MUST BE APPLIED TO STOCKPILES IF NOT
RELOCATED WITHIN 7 DAYS.
ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL STOCK-
PILES.
STOCKPILE LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON SITE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE
AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE AREA THAT IS BEING
WORKED UPON. EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF STOCKPILES WILL
BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
TEMPORARY STOCKPILE DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
E
Q
11
04
O
V
Ln H
I� Z Z
W co Q
Q- 00
s
W NU
¢ Z �H
W
J Z0
a 0Z
0
U) (�
z LL
W
Y
w
w J
U O
�g
Qw
w
Q o
w
m
z
z
0
Q
0
_
0
z
z
0
0
U
0
0
0
Q
DATE: AUGUST 2020 1
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN
Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
htty://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ugulatoE3PermitProgram/Contact/CouniyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number. (828) 271-7980
Fax Number: (828) 281-8120
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number. (919) 554-4884
Fax Number. (919) 562-0421
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251-4610
Fax Number. (252) 975-1399
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number. (910) 2514025
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1
jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 328 Champion Drive
City, State:
Canton, NC
County: Haywood
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple (See Attached)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Spiller, KCI Technologies Inc.
Mailing Address: 4505 Falls of Neuse Rd, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone Number: 919-278-2514
Electronic Mail Address: Adam.Spiller@kci.com
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Multiple Owners (See attached list)
Mailing Address: N/A
N/A
Telephone Number: N/A
Electronic Mail Address: N/A
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/ParceVrax Record).
Version: May 2017
Page 2
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION' 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Adam Spiller
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
11 /24/2020
Date
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all j urisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
�rocess.
I,/ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
' For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3
Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an =roved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 0.90 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4
Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
aProject Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.5420
Longitude:-82.8458
aA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
✓❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. httn://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Proeram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5
Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs. please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS, please complete an Ayproved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
FA Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
A USGS Topographic Map
a Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/remdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6
t
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam Spiller, KCI Technologies Inc. 4505 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Haywood City: Canton
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.5420 Long.:-82.8458
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Beaverdam Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity Map
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Canton 1:24K
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS WSS - Haywood County Data
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): 2019 Statewide Aerial Photographs
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Adam Spiller Dee: I2020.1ly 12409:3 1by Adam 9P-0500'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal Stream Summary Table
Table 1.
Stream Name
I
Stream Status
Length
(Feet)
Width
(Feet)
NCSAM
Score
Latitude
Longitude
Beaverdam Creek
Perennial
478
20
Low
35.5420
-82.8458
November 2020
Page 1 of 1
s
-
o
c
s
gr�r�rn
p,3�e Lo°P
ca -
n -
fir Rd
n
$rjhy Cir
t,
N
C
_ C
r .
D .~
Srn��~tom e�3 O Rd ?
a
0
L
N Q
a u
Old Cryd� Rry n
i , New Clyde Hwy
Cor�i,r, � R•:r1
•
r�t��Lyi,�7Aa��I►�j������
7�
�,r: o
n
3
n
St
.•
Qy
r
♦d as;
N�
It\\0 Evergreen
Pa k3gmg
x Canton
R�r�h St D
CO
Array 5�
�Ohnsor�
0
v -1�7 Rd
a
X
G ! a
b 0
J
s
z
A�s,e�'dleNwY
n
s
^strait Mountai �
ventand`� Johns a
h ar n r 0
t Od-
n ch°W Rr!
c Rd
N 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Project Area W E Miles Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
K C I Map created 7131120 Haywood County
s Image Source: ESRI
:�ssoctnreso> NC World Street Map
o-Q z
D
-1c
AARRIN RD n
y s, i:`✓Fap,�M St, ~�t'.
�Q
3
n
.. 'D
.•`
~
N Canim a`
Elm Shc;
�LrN S'
e
a Lei
pp 4o n ►fib TF
�,a
a,
iG08E4
av�
SON
M 3f
rl�., WINES Df` ._..__. -----
.._ _.
cf`p.
v
20
V, •
oLfMMOPlS Si
�'
f.
r7A'CD
9yfj
y90
� lfQ
O N
T �
r
Z 4
Dix�F Wy
7v
rS f OA!)
r?
Sl
1 �. '�+•—-....-,
SCHOC..
.-
I A
1ALk J, ,J
- - -
Can Inn
-. -'
Mr
�Rp
—+—
N
1,000 500 0 1,000
Figure 2: USGS Map
0 Project Area
w E
Feet
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Map created 7131120
Haywood County
K C
I
s
Image Source: Canton
4sscxf�res of Nc
USGS 1:24000 Quadrangle Map
t $
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal City/County: Haywood Sampling Date: 4/17/17
Applicant/Owner: KCI State: NC Sampling Point: Upland
Investigator(s): J. Sullivan Section, Township, Range: Canton
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): N-130B Lat: 35.5419 Long:-82.8458 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland?Area Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
The area is located in a maintained lawn adjacent to a building
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
X_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Platanus occidentalis 5 X FACW
2. Cercis canidensis 5 X FACU
3. Pyrus callervana 5 X N/A
4. Acer rubrum 5 X FAC
7
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Rubus aroutus 5
2. Ligustrum sinense 5
3. Elaegnus pungens 5
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 7.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Festuca sp.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7
X FACU
X FACU
X N/A
15 = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 3
75 X N/A
Sampling Point: Upland
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 22%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hvdrophvtic Veoetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9 than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10. m) tall.
11. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
75 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: 37.5 20% of total cover: 15
30' Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) height.
1. Lonicera japonica 5 X FACU
2.
3.
4. Hydrophytic
5• Vegetation
5 = Total Cover Present? Yes No X
50% of total cover: 2•5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The area is located in a maintained lawn adjacent to a building
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point: Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100 SL
2-5 10YR 3/3 100 SL
5-18+ 10YR 3/4 100 SCL
-'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil;'.-
- Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user manual version z.i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal 2. Date of evaluation: 4/17/17
3. Applicant/owner name: KCI 4. Assessor name/organization: J. Sullivan / KCI
5. County: Haywood 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: French Broad on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Beaverdam Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.5420 /-82.8458
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Beaverdam Creek 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 50
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 20 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow OTidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ® Mountains (M) ❑ Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®Al-�� l ❑B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ®Size 4 (2 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (01 Oil 0111 ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish 0303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
section or attached?
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplainfintertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
OF Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
01 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
-a N
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
-a Eu
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
t
=
❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
W
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E
Little or no habitat
"""*"'*'*"**"REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*****"'*
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ®Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ®Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes []No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
® ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
® ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
® ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
"taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
mats)
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 2 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
®B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (Z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A 2 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
®C ®C ®C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
It) hO1N Of 01 burs bA Yidi�t bfhk, C-ilrl�fi� ltd 1biMhc2: ❑
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ®D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ®B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. []No Water []Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E 2 230
Notes/Sketch:
Cattle have access to the stream
a
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Beaverdam Creek Dam Date of Assessment 4/17/17
Removal
Stream Category Ma4 Assessor Name/Organization J. Sullivan / KCI
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermo regulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermo regulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW
MMMM=r4�
MMMMAIIM�
+� ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS . SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
KCI4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone 919-783-9214 • Fax 919-783.9266
ASSOCIATES OF NC
1. 09/12/16 - View of dam looking upstream.
2. 11/08/16 - View of dam looking upstream from western bank.
THE MOST IN(REDIRIE THING WE A ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM WWW. Kc .COM
5. 04/22/20 -View of Beaverdam Creek flowing overtop the dam from eastern bank.
6. 04/22/20 - View of Beaverdam Creek flowing overtop dap looking upstream.
THE MOST INCREDIBEE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM M NAV . K( 1. c ON1
The Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal Project is located on properties owned by:
J N Powell Jr. Family LTD PTNRP
Viola Forga Trust (Chris Forga)
PIN — 8657-64-1379 and 8657-64-2381
Deed Book 516; Page 875
PO Box 188
Hazelwood, NC 28738
Phone: (828) 400-4400
Email: Chris@forgarentalproperties.com
J N Powell Jr. Family LTD PTNRP (Sam Powell)
Viola Forga Trust
PIN — 8657-64-1379 and 8657-64-2381
Deed Book 516; Page 875
PO Box 10
Clyde, NC 28721
Phone: (828) 507-2820
Email: N/A
David Collins Brooks
PIN — 8657-64-3535
Deed Book 926; Page 768
24 North Canton Road
Canton, NC 28716
Phone: (828) 367-8733
Email: N/A
Hope Harrison Andrews
PIN — 8657-64-3400
Deed Book 1011; Page 1053
550 Case Cove Road
Chandler, NC 28715-9226
Phone: (828) 273-4673
Email: ebbyhope@yahoo.com
LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("License Agreement") is by and between Chris
Forga on behalf of the Viola Forga Trust ("Licensor"), and American Rivers, Inc. ("Licensee"), ("the
Parties").
WHEREAS, the Licensor is the owner of the property at PIN 8657-64-1379 located at 328
Champion Dr, Canton, NC ("Property");
WHEREAS, the Property contains a dam on Beaverdam Creek;
WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee agree to remove the dam for the purpose of restoring
the river;
WHEREAS, the Licensee has requested access to the Property for the purpose of survey,
construction/demolition, and monitoring related to the river restoration (the "Work");
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises, promises and covenants, that are
hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:
Licensor grants to Licensee, its employees, representatives, contractors, and subcontractors,
including but not limited to KCI, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Haywood Waterways
Association ("Project Partners") the right to access the Property at all reasonable times for the
purpose of performing the Work.
This License Agreement shall commence on the date that it is fully executed by the Parties and
shall continue until Licensee completes the Work, but no later than December 31, 2022 The
rights granted by this License are specifically designed to inure to the benefit of the Licensee and
its contractors, subcontractors, employees and representatives, including the Project Partners.
The Licensor and the Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not convey any right, title,
easement or interest of a permanent nature in the Property to the Licensee or any other person.
The Licensor and Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not waive other rights either
party may have under federal, state, and local law.
4. Upon termination of the Work, Licensee shall restore any portions of the Property disturbed by
the Work, as set forth in a detailed site plan to be provided at a later date, with the understanding
that the Dams will have been removed and associated habitat restoration activities will have been
completed.
Licensee shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain and keep in force at all times during the
License Period: (1) commercial general liability insurance, which shall include contractual
liability coverage against third -party claims for bodily injury or property damage occurring on the
Property as a result of Licensee or Project Partners' Work; primary coverage will be a minimum
aggregate limit of not less than $1,000,000 and excess umbrella aggregate limit of not less than
$2,000,000; and (2) Employers' Liability and Workers' Compensation Insurance to the extent
required by law.
6. Licensee accepts the condition of the Property "as is" and acknowledges that Licensor has not
made and makes no warranty of any kind as to the condition of the Property for the use intended
under this License.
Licensee assumes no liability for any existing or future environmental conditions of the Property.
Licensor indemnifies and holds harmless Licensee for any pollutants, hazardous materials and/or
substances on the Property from acts or omissions of Licensor and/or past owners, operators, or
tenants of the Property, and acts or omissions of any transporters and/or arrangers of any
pollutants, hazardous materials and/or substances on the Property, which may be disturbed as a
result of the Work. Licensee agrees to notify Licensor of any such pollutants, hazardous
materials and/or substances discovered on the Property in accordance with, or as a result of, the
Work. The Licensor's obligations under this section shall survive the termination of this License
Agreement.
Neither party shall be liable to the other for any liability for consequential, special or incidental
damages including, without limitation, any damages arising out of business interruption, lost
profits, loss of rental income, or loss of the use of the Property whether any such claim is brought
by Licensor, Licensor's tenants or any other third party.
9. This License Agreement shall be governed and construed under and in accordance with the laws
of the State of North Carolina.
10. This License Agreement constitutes the entire agreement by and between the parties hereto and
no other oral or written agreements, arrangements, representations or understandings, unless
specifically noted herein, shall be deemed to be in existence. This License Agreement, for all
purposes, supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, if any, between the parties hereto, and
may not be amended or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by all parties to be
bound.
11. The license granted hereby is personal to Licensee and shall not be assigned or sub -licensed
without the prior written consent of Licensor. Licensor shall transfer the rights and obligations of
this License Agreement to any successors, heirs, executors, lessees, or assigns of the Property for
the remainder of the License Period, including but not limited to the remainder of Work to be
completed by Licensee and its Project Partners. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties
hereto, and their respective successors and assigns.
2
Any Notices under this License Agreement shall be deemed duly delivered if hand -delivered or mailed by
U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, to:
Licensor: Viola Forga Trust
PO Box 188
Hazelwood, NC 28738
Attn: Chris Forga
Licensee: American Rivers
12 Rex Dr
Asheville, NC 28806
Attn: Erin McCombs
With a copy to: American Rivers, Inc.
ATTN: General Counsel
1101 14`h St., NW
Suite 1400
Washington, DC 20005
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Licensor and Licensee have executed this License Agreement as of the
day and the year first set forth above.
0,0799,.
Witness:
VIOLA FORGA TRUST
CHRIS FORGA
Bv: GCJ
Date: c� f ova
AMERICAN RIVERS, INC.
i'm
Date: 9/8/2020
3
LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("License Agreement") is by and between Sam
Powell on behalf of J N Powell Family Limited Partnership ("Licensor"), and American Rivers, Inc.
("Licensee"), ("the Parties").
WHEREAS, the Licensor is the owner of the property at PIN 8657-64-1379 located at 328
Champion Dr, Canton, NC ("Property");
WHEREAS, the Property contains a dam on Beaverdam Creek;
WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee agree to remove the dam for the purpose of restoring
the river;
WHEREAS, the Licensee has requested access to the Property for the purpose of survey,
construction/demolition, and monitoring related to the river restoration (the "Work");
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises, promises and covenants, that are
hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:
1. Licensor grants to Licensee, its employees, representatives, contractors, and subcontractors,
including but not limited to KCI, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Haywood Waterways
Association ("Project Partners") the right to access the Property at all reasonable times for the
purpose of performing the Work.
2. This License Agreement shall commence on the date that it is fully executed by the Parties and
shall continue until Licensee completes the Work, but no later than December 31, 2022 The
rights granted by this License are specifically designed to inure to the benefit of the Licensee and
its contractors, subcontractors, employees and representatives, including the Project Partners.
3. The Licensor and the Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not convey any right, title,
easement or interest of a permanent nature in the Property to the Licensee or any other person.
The Licensor and Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not waive other rights either
party may have under federal, state, and local law.
4. Upon termination of the Work, Licensee shall restore any portions of the Property disturbed by
the Work, as set forth in a detailed site plan to be provided at a later date, with the understanding
that the Dams will have been removed and associated habitat restoration activities will have been
completed.
5. Licensee shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain and keep in force at all times during the
License Period: (1) commercial general liability insurance, which shall include contractual
liability coverage against third -party claims for bodily injury or property damage occurring on the
Property as a result of Licensee or Project Partners' Work; primary coverage will be a minimum
aggregate limit of not less than $1,000,000 and excess umbrella aggregate limit of not less than
$2,000,000; and (2) Employers' Liability and Workers' Compensation Insurance to the extent
required by law.
6. Licensee accepts the condition of the Property "as is" and acknowledges that Licensor has not
made and makes no warranty of any kind as to the condition of the Property for the use intended
under this License.
7. Licensee assumes no liability for any existing or future environmental conditions of the Property.
Licensor indemnifies and holds harmless Licensee for any pollutants, hazardous materials and/or
substances on the Property from acts or omissions of Licensor and/or past owners, operators, or
tenants of the Property, and acts or omissions of any transporters and/or arrangers of any
pollutants, hazardous materials and/or substances on the Property, which may be disturbed as a
result of the Work. Licensee agrees to notify Licensor of any such pollutants, hazardous
materials and/or substances discovered on the Property in accordance with, or as a result of, the
Work. The Licensor's obligations under this section shall survive the termination of this License
Agreement.
Neither party shall be liable to the other for any liability for consequential, special or incidental
damages including, without limitation, any damages arising out of business interruption, lost
profits, loss of rental income, or loss of the use of the Property whether any such claim is brought
by Licensor, Licensor's tenants or any other third party.
9. This License Agreement shall be governed and construed under and in accordance with the laws
of the State of North Carolina.
10. This License Agreement constitutes the entire agreement by and between the parties hereto and
no other oral or written agreements, arrangements, representations or understandings, unless
specifically noted herein, shall be deemed to be in existence. This License Agreement, for all
purposes, supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, if any, between the parties hereto, and
may not be amended or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by all parties to be
bound.
11. The license granted hereby is personal to Licensee and shall not be assigned or sub -licensed
without the prior written consent of Licensor. Licensor shall transfer the rights and obligations of
this License Agreement to any successors, heirs, executors, lessees, or assigns of the Property for
the remainder of the License Period, including but not limited to the remainder of Work to be
completed by Licensee and its Project Partners. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties
hereto, and their respective successors and assigns.
Any Notices under this License Agreement shall be deemed duty delivered ifhand-delivered or mailed by
U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, to:
Licensor: J N Powell Family Limited Partnership
PO Box 10
Clyde, NC 28721
Attn: Sam Powell
Licensee: American Rivers
12 Rex Dr
Asheville, NC 28806
Attn: Erin McCombs
With a copy to: American Rivers, Inc.
AT -TN: General Counsel
l 101 14'h St., NW
Suite 1400
Washington, DC 20005
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Licensor and Licensee have executed this License Agreement as of the
day and the year first set forth above.
Witness:
Witness:
J N POWELL FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
SAM POWELL y
By:
Date:
AMERICAN RIVERS, INC.
WS
Date:
3
LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("License Agreement") is by and between David
Collins Brooks ("Licensor"), and American Rivers, Inc. ("Licensee"), ("the Parties").
WHEREAS, the Licensor is the owner of the property at PIN 8657-64-3535 located at 24 Canton
Rd., Canton, NC 28716 ("Property");
WHEREAS, the Property contains streamside along Beaverdam Creek;
WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee agree to streambank restoration for the purpose of
restoring the river;
WHEREAS, the Licensee has requested access to the Property for the purpose of survey,
construction/demolition, and monitoring related to the river restoration (the "Work");
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises, promises and covenants, that are
hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:
1. Licensor grants to Licensee, its employees, representatives, contractors, and subcontractors,
including but not limited to KCI, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Haywood Waterways
Association ("Project Partners") the right to access the Property at all reasonable times for the
purpose of performing the Work.
2. This License Agreement shall commence on the date that it is fully executed by the Parties and
shall continue until Licensee completes the Work, but no later than December 31, 2022 The
rights granted by this License are specifically designed to inure to the benefit of the Licensee and
its contractors, subcontractors, employees and representatives, including the Project Partners.
The Licensor and the Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not convey any right, title,
easement or interest of a permanent nature in the Property to the Licensee or any other person.
The Licensor and Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not waive other rights either
party may have under federal, state, and local law.
4. Upon termination of the Work, Licensee shall restore any portions of the Property disturbed by
the Work, as set forth in a detailed site plan to be provided at a later date, with the understanding
that the Dams will have been removed and associated habitat restoration activities will have been
completed.
5. Licensee shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain and keep in force at all times during the
License Period: (1) commercial general liability insurance, which shall include contractual
liability coverage against third -party claims for bodily injury or property damage occurring on the
Property as a result of Licensee or Project Partners' Work; primary coverage will be a minimum
aggregate limit of not less than $1,000,000 and excess umbrella aggregate limit of not less than
$2,000,000; and (2) Employers' Liability and Workers' Compensation Insurance to the extent
required by law.
Licensee accepts the condition of the Property "as is" and acknowledges that Licensor has not
made and makes no warranty of any kind as to the condition of the Property for the use intended
under this License.
Licensee assumes no liability for any existing or future environmental conditions of the Property.
Licensor indemnifies and holds harmless Licensee for any pollutants, hazardous materials and/or
substances on the Property from acts or omissions of Licensor and/or past owners, operators, or
tenants of the Property, and acts or omissions of any transporters and/or arrangers of any
pollutants, hazardous materials and/or substances on the Property, which may be disturbed as a
result of the Work. Licensee agrees to notify Licensor of any such pollutants, hazardous
materials and/or substances discovered on the Property in accordance with, or as a result of, the
Work. The Licensor's obligations under this section shall survive the termination of this License
Agreement.
Neither party shall be liable to the other for any liability for consequential, special or incidental
damages including, without limitation, any damages arising out of business interruption, lost
profits, loss of rental income, or loss of the use of the Property whether any such claim is brought
by Licensor, Licensor's tenants or any other third party.
9. This License Agreement shall be governed and construed under and in accordance with the laws
of the State of North Carolina.
10. This License Agreement constitutes the entire agreement by and between the parties hereto and
no other oral or written agreements, arrangements, representations or understandings, unless
specifically noted herein, shall be deemed to be in existence. This License Agreement, for all
purposes, supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, if any, between the parties hereto, and
may not be amended or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by all parties to be
bound.
H . The license granted hereby is personal to Licensee and shall not be assigned or sub -licensed
without the prior written consent of Licensor. Licensor shall transfer the rights and obligations of
this License Agreement to any successors, heirs, executors, lessees, or assigns of the Property for
the remainder of the License Period, including but not limited to the remainder of Work to be
completed by Licensee and its Project Partners. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties
hereto, and their respective successors and assigns.
2
Any Notices under this License Agreement shall be deemed duly delivered if hand -delivered or mailed bN
U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, to:
Licensor: David Collins Brooks
24 N Canton Rd
Canton, NC 28716
Attn: Sam Powell
Licensee: American Rivers
12 Rex Dr
Asheville, NC 28806
Attn: Erin McCombs
With a copy to: American Rivers, Inc.
ATTN: General Counsel
1101 14`h St., NW
Suite 1400
Washington, DC 20005
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Licensor and Licensee have executed this License Agreement as of the
day and the year first set forth above.
Witness:
N. y l-vxjol'^!�X7� Am,
Witness:
DAVID COLLINS BROOKS
By:
Date:
AMERICAN RIVERS, INC.
3
LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LAND ACCESS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("License Agreement") is by and between Hope
Harrison Andrews ("Licensor"), and American Rivers, Inc. ("Licensee"), ("the Parties").
WHEREAS, the Licensor is the owner of the property at PIN 8657-64-3400 located at
Beaverdam Rd., Canton, NC ("Property");
WHEREAS, the Property contains streamside along Beaverdam Creek;
WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee agree to streambank restoration for the purpose of
restoring the river;
WHEREAS, the Licensee has requested access to the Property for the purpose of survey,
construction/demolition, and monitoring related to the river restoration (the "Work");
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises, promises and covenants, that are
hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows:
Licensor grants to Licensee, its employees, representatives, contractors, and subcontractors,
including but not limited to KCI, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Haywood Waterways
Association ("Project Partners") the right to access the Property at all reasonable times for the
purpose of performing the Work.
2. This License Agreement shall commence on the date that it is fully executed by the Parties and
shall continue until Licensee completes the Work, but no later than December 31, 2022 The
rights granted by this License are specifically designed to inure to the benefit of the Licensee and
its contractors, subcontractors, employees and representatives, including the Project Partners.
3. The Licensor and the Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not convey any right, title,
easement or interest of a permanent nature in the Property to the Licensee or any other person.
The Licensor and Licensee agree that this License Agreement does not waive other rights either
party may have under federal, state, and local law.
4. Upon termination of the Work, Licensee shall restore any portions of the Property disturbed by
the Work, as set forth in a detailed site plan to be provided at a later date, with the understanding
that the Dams will have been removed and associated habitat restoration activities will have been
completed.
Licensee shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain and keep in force at all times during the
License Period: (1) commercial general liability insurance, which shall include contractual
liability coverage against third -party claims for bodily injury or property damage occurring on the
Property as a result of Licensee or Project Partners' Work; primary coverage will be a minimum
aggregate limit of not less than $1,000,000 and excess umbrella aggregate limit of not less than
$2,000,000; and (2) Employers' Liability and Workers' Compensation Insurance to the extent
required by law.
6. Licensee accepts the condition of the Property "as is" and acknowledges that Licensor has not
made and makes no warranty of any kind as to the condition of the Property for the use intended
under this License.
Licensee assumes no liability for any existing or future environmental conditions of the Property.
Licensor indemnifies and holds harmless Licensee for any pollutants, hazardous materials and/or
substances on the Property from acts or omissions of Licensor and/or past owners, operators, or
tenants of the Property, and acts or omissions of any transporters and/or arrangers of any
pollutants, hazardous materials and/or substances on the Property, which may be disturbed as a
result of the Work. Licensee agrees to notify Licensor of any such pollutants, hazardous
materials and/or substances discovered on the Property in accordance with, or as a result of, the
Work. The Licensor's obligations under this section shall survive the termination of this License
Agreement.
8. Neither party shall be liable to the other for any liability for consequential, special or incidental
damages including, without limitation, any damages arising out of business interruption, lost
profits, loss of rental income, or loss of the use of the Property whether any such claim is brought
by Licensor, Licensor's tenants or any other third party.
9. This License Agreement shall be governed and construed under and in accordance with the laws
of the State of North Carolina.
10. This License Agreement constitutes the entire agreement by and between the parties hereto and
no other oral or written agreements, arrangements, representations or understandings, unless
specifically noted herein, shall be deemed to be in existence. This License Agreement, for all
purposes, supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, if any, between the parties hereto, and
may not be amended or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by all parties to be
bound.
11. The license granted hereby is personal to Licensee and shall not be assigned or sub -licensed
without the prior written consent of Licensor. Licensor shall transfer the rights and obligations of
this License Agreement to any successors, heirs, executors, lessees, or assigns of the Property for
the remainder of the License Period, including but not limited to the remainder of Work to be
completed by Licensee and its Project Partners. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties
hereto, and their respective successors and assigns.
Any Notices under this License Agreement shall be deemed duly delivered if hand -delivered or mailed by
U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, to:
Licensor. Hope Harrison Andrews
550 Case Cove Rd
Candler, NC 28715
Attn: Hope Harrison Andrews
Licensee: American Rivers
12 Rex Dr
Asheville, NC 28806
Attn: Erin McCombs
With a copy to: American Rivers, Inc.
ATI'N: General Counsel
1101 10 St., NW
Suite 1400
Washington, DC 20005
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Licensor and Licensee have executed this License Agreement as of the
day and the year first set forth above.
Witne
stephejl 3arn wel
Witness:
HOPE HARRISON ANDREWS
AMERICAN RIVERS, INC.
By:
Date:
3
c. J
�6�
WIIIIIIIIIIIEF4�
tt mmrd� wmmd� ISO 9001:2008CERTIFIED
ttttttttttiti� — - - --- — --
�� ENbINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
KC14505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone 919-783-9214 • Fax 919-783-9266
ASSOCIATES OF NC
August 13, 2020
Mr. David Brown
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Subject: Sediment and Hydraulic Analysis Memo
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Haywood County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brown;
This memo addresses the requirement for de minimis impacts related to sediment release for this dam removal
project as well as an analysis of the stability of the designed grade control structures.
Sediment Analysis
An analysis of the sediment transport was conducted to provide evidence that water quality impacts will be de
minimis with the removal of the dam and the release of the sediment behind the dam. The dam had been intact
throughout recent history until a gate at the bottom of the dam breached in 2015, drawing down the water and
sediment that had been impounded. In the 2017 site visit and survey, this breach was observed with little sediment
trapped behind the dam. Since that visit, the gate has apparently become clogged with debris and sediment has again
accumulated behind the dam. The breach and the change from 2017 to 2020 can be seen in the pictures below.
Figure 1. Looking Upstream at the Hole in the Dam in 2017
[mpluyee-Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE
WWW.KCI.COM
Figure 2. Looking at the Upstream Condition of the Dam in 2017
Figure 3. Looking at the Upstream Condition of the Dam in 2020
To remove the dam, the impoundment will be dewatered by either opening up the existing gate or notching the dam
to the gate to release the backed -up water and lower the water surface elevation behind the dam. A sediment analysis
was completed in HEC-RAS 4.1.0 model to determine the amount of sediment that would flow through the dam
after it was breached. The impact will be considered de minimis, or too small to have a significant detrimental
impact on the surrounding ecosystem, if that amount of sediment is lower than the sediment that would typically be
released from this watershed during a 20-year storm event.
The extent of the sediment that would be disturbed with the removal of the dam was assumed to be located within
the backwater of the dam, which extends 600' upstream of the dam. In this reach of stream, the depth of the sediment
that would be disturbed was predicted based on the bed difference between the 2017 and 2020 surveys along with
an extra two feet in depth below the 2017 surface to be more conservative. In cross -sections outside of the survey
but within the backwater of the dam it was assumed that the bed would change up to two feet below the existing
ground.
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW.KC1.00M
The typical bed materials used for the sediment analysis were from bulk samples completed by KCI in 2017. A
lateral bar upstream of the dam was sampled twice, once in the upper portion of the bar and once in the lower
portion. The bar was dominated by a muddy fine sand, with finer sediment on the downstream side. Each sample
was collected to a depth of approximately six inches. The first (upper bar) sample had a D50 below 1 mm and a
D84 of 4.57 mm. The second (lower bar) sample had both its D50 and D84 below 1 mm. The second sample was
entered as the bed gradation for all of the cross -sections within the backwater of the dam because the sediment was
smaller in that area. The rest of the cross -sections used the upstream sample. Table 1 shows the breakdown of each
sample. The Laursen (Copeland) sediment transport function method was used with this typical sediment material
to predict the rates of sediment movement. This method was used because it includes sediment types down into the
silt and sand range, which were observed at the project site.
Table 1: Grain Size Classification of Sediment Material
Sediment Material
Grain Diameter Range
(mm)
Upper Bar Sample
(% Finer)
Lower Bar Sample
(% Finer)
Clay
0.002 - 0.004
Very Fine Silt
0.004 - 0.008
Fine Silt
0.008 - 0.016
Medium Silt
0.016 - 0.032
Course Silt
0.032 - 0.0625
Very Fine Sand
0.0625 - 0.125
Find Sand
0.125 - 0.25
Medium Sand
0.25 - 0.5
Coarse Sand
0.5 - 1
Very Coarse Sand
1-2
64.6
89.6
Very Fine Gravel
2-4
70.9
91.6
Fine Gravel
4-8
80.7
97.1
Medium Gravel
8 - 16
89.5
98.1
Coarse Gravel
16 - 32
96.4
100
Very Coarse
Gravel
32 - 64
100
Small Cobbles
64 - 128
Large Cobbles
128 - 256
Small Boulders
256 - 512
Medium Boulders
512 - 1024
Large Boulders
1024 - 2048
A rating curve comparing the suspended sediment load to instantaneous discharge needed to be created to determine
the amount of sediment moving through the system. USGS stream gages often have historic data that compares
these two variables. Since Beaverdam Creek did not have a USGS gage located within its watershed, several nearby
USGS gages were reviewed to determine which gage had the most similar land use cover compared to the project
site. The land use cover was predicted from 2011 National Land Cover Database (NLCD) percentages created from
StreamStats for the watershed at each site. The Hominy Creek gage, USGS #03448500, had the most similar land
uses as seen in the table below.
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWw.KC1.COM
A
Table 2: Watershed Comparisons
NLCD 2011
Location
River
Drainage Area
(Sq. Miles)
Impervious
Cultivated Crops
Forest
Developed
%
%
%
(%
Project Site
Beaverdam
11.2
1.4
16.2
70.4
11.9
Creek
USGS
Hominy
Gage
Creek
79.3
1.5
15.6
69.4
Li.7
#3448500
The historic suspended sediment concentration (mg/L) data was retrieved from the Hominy Creek gage and used to
create the rating curve comparing the concentration with the instantaneous discharge measured at the same time.
The rating curve graph can be seen below. Any discharge outside of the data was assumed based on the trend line
it created.
Rating Curve
(Discharge Over Suspended Sediment Concentration)
180
160 ■
LL 140
U
W 120 j
M
m
100
80
0
c i
;0 60
c 40 j -
■ y = 0.004xz - 0.5881x + 37.907
20-■�___- RZ=0.9572
I
0 ■ ---------- - ----
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Suspended Sediment Concentration (mg/L)
■ USGS #03448500 Hominy Creek — — — — Trendline
Empioyee-Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW.KCI.COM
The following equation was used to convert from suspended sediment concentration (mg/L) to suspended sediment
load (ton/day).
Qs=Qw*Cs*k
QS = Suspended Sediment Load (ton/dat)
Qw = Discharge (CFS)
CS = Suspended Sediment Concentration (mg/L)
K = coefficient (0.0027)
Hydrographs, in conjunction with the rating curve, were created for the 2-year and 5-year storm events to determine
the amount of sediment that moved through the stream during those storm events. Since there are no observed data
on Beaverdam Creek to create the hydrographs, a synthetic SCS dimensionless unit hydrograph was used. This
hydrograph uses ratios comparing time to time -to -peak discharge and comparing discharge to peak discharge to
create a time over discharge hydrograph. The time -to -peak discharge was calculated using the time of concentration
at the confluence of Beaverdam Creek and Pigeon River. The time of concentration was predicted using the
watershed lag method which includes the flow length, average watershed land slope, and the curve number. The
2011 NLCD percentages generated from StreamStats determined the curve number used for the calculation. The
curve number used was 53 and the time -to -peak discharge was 10.5 hours for the entire Beaverdam Creek
watershed. The peak discharges used for the hydrograph ratios were calculated using USGS regression equations
from the USGS Rural Equations Report 2009-5158 and are seen in the table below. The 1-year discharge was not
included in the USGS equations but was extrapolated from the trendline created from the peak discharges.
Table 3: USGS Discharges
Storm Event
Discharge
(CFS
1-Year
284
2-Year
720
5-Year
1273
The hydrographs are shown below along with the cumulative sediment output in tons that was generated from the
HEC-RAS model. The total cumulative sediment output for the 2-year storm is 1,186 tons and the 5-year storm is
1,656 tons.
Gmplow -c-(honed Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW.KCI.COM
2-Year Discharge v Sediment Output
1400
1200
c
600 1000 H
a
LL 500 800
v O
�• Y
400 600 aci
o E
o
u N
p 300 400 N
v
.y
200 200 2
M
U
100 0
0 -200
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Time (hr)
Discharge Cumlative Sediment Output
5-Year Discharge v Sediment Output
1400
1800
1600
1200
1400 0
~
1000
1200 a
LL
u
800
1000 O
�
c
v
800
600
u
v
V)
600
400
400 E
v
200
200
0
0
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
40
Time (hr)
Discharge —Cumlative Sediment Output
E1n��ln�cr-(h+nrtlSinec 1`)�ti
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE \\tit1s .KCL( oV
Also, a rating curve comparing discharge over stage was developed for the downstream boundary condition.
The amount of sediment released with the removal of the dam needed to be calculated to compare with the storm
events. A constant 1-year peak discharge was assumed to be the base flow and applied over the time period of a
week, the predicted time it would take for the sediment to wash out behind the dam and the water surface elevation
to lower enough for work to begin. The total cumulative sediment output for the base flow is 1,570 tons, as seen in
the graph below.
Base Flow Discharge v Sediment Output
300
1800
1600
250 !
1400 0
i
~
200
l 1200 a
N
LL
u
!
M
F 1000 O
29
150
I
800 ;3
100
600
400
50
v
200
0
_ __. _ _ _ . ____ _.._ _ __ -
0
0.00
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00
180.00
Time (hr)
Discharge Cumlative Sediment Output
The predicted sediment released from the removal of the dam at 1,570 tons is close to the 5-year storm of 1,656
tons and is considered de minimis. The dam is also located near the confluence with the Pigeon River and the
amount of sediment that will be generated from the dam removal will most likely be smaller than much smaller
storm events within the Pigeon River. Therefore, the estimated amount of sediment released by the removal of the
dam will not negatively impact the downstream water quality or ecosystems.
Grade Control Structure Stability Analysis
The stability of the riprap in the proposed riffles was analyzed by comparing the proposed riprap mixture with the
maximum stone size that will move from the 10-year storm. The 10-year storm discharge of 3240 CFS was
determined from the FEMA Flood Insurance Study for the Town of Canton, NC. A HEC-RAS model was created
for the proposed conditions and produces a maximum shear stress of 6.91b/ft' in the first riffle and 29.8 lb/ft2 in the
second riffle. The second riffle has a larger shear stress because it has a steeper slope at 11%. The maximum
diameter of the stone that the shear stress will begin to move was determined by using two different trendlines, the
Rosgen Colorado trendline and the Leopold, Wolman, and Miller 1964 trendline. The maximum stone diameter for
f mhlrvee-Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE wVVW.KCI.COM
each riffle was calculated as the largest number from the two trendlines and set as the target d100 of the designed
riprap mixture. The calculated largest stone size needed for the first riffle is 24.8 in and the second riffle is 72.7 in.
The proposed riprap for both riffles will be 40% Class 1 Riprap, 40% Class 2 Riprap, and 20% Boulders which
provides a d 100 of 48 in. The first riffle should be stable because the proposed riprap mixture has a larger stone size
than the one predicted from the Rosgen trendline. While the second riffle will have a smaller stone size than
determined from the trendline, it should be stable because the boulders and riprap will interlock and work together
to anchor the riffle in place. Also, the boulders in the proposed riprap mixture should not move because their size
was specified to match stable boulders in an existing downstream riffle with a similar slope.
The Coefficient of Curvature, Cz, of the riprap mixture was calculated to determine if the mixture is well mixed.
Well mixed riprap is needed to make sure that it will anchor in place and have little void space. The Coefficient of
Curvature, Cz, for well -mixed rock is between 1 and 3 according to R. F. Craig's Soil Mechanics book. The
Coefficient of Curvature is calculated by the equation: Cz = d302/(d6O * d10). The riprap mixture for the project
has a Cz of 1.0 which is within the appropriate range.
f mph yee-(honed Since 1988
RISE TO 1HL CHALLENGE WWW.KCi.COM
Joe Sullivan
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Here's what was sent to Byron.
-adam
From: Adam Spiller
Adam Spiller
Monday, November 23, 2020 1:00 PM
Joe Sullivan
FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal Project
BeaverdamCreek_BE_20200831.pdf
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:33 PM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <byron_hamstead@fws.gov>
Cc: Boltin, Walter <walter_boltin@fws.gov>; Erin McCombs (emccombs@americanrivers.org)
<emccombs@amencannvers.org>; Joe Sullivan <Joe.Sullivan@kci.com>; david.w.brown@usace.army.mil
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal Project
Byron,
Here's the biological evaluation for the project. Let me know if you need anything else or have any questions on this
one. We're in the process of wrapping up the permit documents now, so hopefully we're submitting everything soon.
Thanks,
adam
Adam Spiller
Regional Praclice Leader — Natural Resources
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
adam. spillera-kci.com
o: 919.278.2514 1 m: 919.475.3696
www.kci.com
From: Hamstead, Byron A <byron hamstead@fws.gov>
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 12:31 PM
To: Adam Spiller <Adam.Spiller@kci.com>
Cc: Boltin, Walter <walter boltin@fws.gov>; Fuemmeler, Amanda J CIV (US) <Amanda.Jones@usace.army.mil>
Subject: [External Email] Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal Project
*""From IT(a-_)KCI.COM 410-316-7820 *** This is an External Email from outside of KCI.***
Hi Adam,
Pls pass along your biological evaluation, habitat assessment, etc. that would be used to support a prudent effect
determination from the appropriate action agency.
Regards,
B
Byron Hamstead
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and may be disclosed to third
parties.
From: Adam Spiller <Adam.Spiller@kci.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 10:44 AM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <byron hamstead@fws.Pov>
Cc: Boltin, Walter <waiter boltin@fws.eov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal Project
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening
attachments, or responding.
Byron,
I just wanted to send you an update on where we are with this project. The permit materials are mostly complete, we
just need to wrap up the landowner authorization forms, with Erin at AR is working on. I don't have a great timeframe
on that, but it should be done soon.
Let me know if you've got time to discuss the project. I want to make sure that everything you want to see will be
included in the permit package for your review. The permit materials will have most of the same components as we've
talked about before when this project started a few years ago, so if there's nothing additional that you want to see
that's fine too. I just want to check.
I've copied Tripp on this since it's his crew that will be doing the work. He may be able to answer questions related to
the construction side of things if you have them.
Thanks,
adam
Adam Spiller
Regional Practice Leader - Natural Resources
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
adam.spiller@kci.com
o: 919.278.2514 1 m: 919.475.3696
www.kci.com
From: Adam Spiller
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 8:34 AM
To:'byron_hamstead@fws.gov' <byron hamstead@fws.eov>
Subject: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal Project
Byron,
I would like to check -in with you on this project when you get a chance. It would be good to update you on the
discussions I've had with USACE and DWR over the past few weeks and I want to make sure that the permit support
materials will have everything you need for the consultation process. My goal is to have the permit materials ready to
submit by the end of July.
I've got Thursday morning open for a call if you have time. Anything before noon will work for me. After that, it would
need to be the week of July 13`h, I'm on vacation next week.
Thanks,
adam
Adam Spiller
Regional Practice Leader — Natural Resources
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
adam.spiller(a)kci.com
o: 919.278.2514 1 m: 919.475.3696
www.kci.com
150 9001:2008 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
KCI4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone 919-783-9214 • Fax 919-783-9266
ASSOCIATES OF NC
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 31, 2020
FROM: Joe Sullivan, KCI Associates of NC
TO: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
RE: Biological Evaluation
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Haywood County, NC
KCI Associates of NC has completed a biological evaluation for the Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Project. The Beaverdam Creek Dam is a privately owned dam and is a complete barrier to upstream
movement of aquatic species on the Beaverdam Creek. The Beaverdam Creek Dam is of concrete
construction and has a structural height of approximately 12 ft and a length of approximately 65 ft.
The dam is currently not maintained, and the normal pool water surface elevation is at times affected
by one low-level gate outlet that passes through the spillway section of the dam and is consistently
open. In the past this gate has breached, and the impoundment and sediment has drained through the
gate. Currently the gate is clogged with debris and flows are going over the top of the dam.
The dam structure will be demolished and removed. Portions of the stream banks will be graded and
stabilized with bioengineering and native vegetation. The impounded sediment will be released over
time due to the dam removal but will meet the'de minimis' sediment condition required by the permits.
Please see the attached sediment analysis for supporting information on `de minimis' conditions. A
variety of heavy equipment may be used for this project, including track hoes (with a hydraulic
hammer), front-end loaders, back hoes, and dump trucks.
Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat assessments were performed in conjunction with the
wetland and stream delineation on April 17, 2017. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) lists ten federally protected species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for Haywood
County (Table 1). A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows, along with the
Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area. Habitat requirements for
each species are based on the current best available information from referenced literature and/or
USFWS.
Employer -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW.KCI.COM
Table 1. Federally protected species listed for Haywood County.
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Present
Conclusion
May affect,
but not likely
lasmidonta raveneliana
Appalachian elktoe
E
No
to adversely
affect
ombus affinis
Rusty -patched bumble
E
No
No Effect
bee
Geum radiatum
Spreading avens
E
No
No Effect
Glaucomys sabrinus
Carolina northern flying
E
No
No Effect
oloratus
squirrel
Gymnoderma lineare
Rock gnome lichen
E
No
No Effect
sotria medeoloides
Small whorled pogonia
T
No
No Effect
icrohexura montivaga
Spruce -fir moss spider
E
No
No Effect
May affect,
but not likely
yotis grisescens
Gray bat
E
No
to adversely
affect
May affect,
but not likely
yotis septentrionalis
Nortliern long-eared bat
T
Yes
to adversely
affect
May affect,
but not likely
yotis sodalis
Indiana bat
E
Yes
to adversely
affect
E - Endangered; T - Threatened
* - Historic record (the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago)
Appalachian elktoe
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: year round
Habitat Description: The Appalachian elktoe is known from the French Broad River watershed in
North Carolina. The Appalachian elktoe has been observed in moderate- to fast -flowing
water, in gravelly substrates often mixed with cobble and boulders, in cracks of bedrock
and in relatively silt -free, coarse, sandy substrates. Apparently, stability of the substrate is
critical to this species, as it is seldom found in stream reaches with accumulations of silt or
shifting sand, gravel, or cobble.
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHAUENGE WWw.KCI.COM
Biological Conclusion: May affect, but not likely to adversely affect
There is no suitable habitat for the Appalachian elktoe within the project area. The dam has
resulted in accumulation of sand and silt behind the dam and in the upstream portions of
Beaverdam Creek. A review of the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates one
known Appalachian elktoe occurrence (EO 13495) within 1.0 mile of the study area. This
population is found in the Pigeon River approximately 1,400 feet upstream of the
confluence with Beaverdam Creek.
Rusty -patched bumble bee
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: early -June and mid -August
Habitat Description: Rusty patched bumble bees once occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies
of the Upper Midwest and Northeast, but most grasslands and prairies have been lost,
degraded, or fragmented by conversion to other uses. Bumble bees need areas that provide
nectar and pollen from flowers, nesting sites (underground and abandoned rodent cavities
or clumps of grasses), and overwintering sites for hibernating queens (undisturbed soil).
Bumble bees gather pollen and nectar from a variety of flowering plants. The rusty patched
emerges early in spring and is one of the last species to go into hibernation. It needs a
constant supply and diversity of flowers blooming throughout the colony's long life, April
through September.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the rusty -patched bumble bee does not occur in the study area. The
USFWS has categorized Haywood County as an "Historical Range: rusty patched bumble
bee not present" for rusty -patched bumble bee. Based off the USFWS Survey Protocols,
paved areas; mowed lawns; forest where invasive shrubs are dominant and spring
ephemeral flowers are absent; and areas mowed too frequently to allow development of
diverse wildflower resources are not suitable habitat for the rusty -patched bumble bee. The
project area is consist of mowed lawns and forested areas with thick invasive shrubs. The
area does not support diverse wildflower resources.
Spreading avens
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: June -September
Habitat Description: Spreading avens occurs in areas exposed to full sun on high -elevation cliffs,
outcrops, and bases of steep talus slopes. This perennial herb also occurs in thin, gravelly
soils of grassy balds near summit outcrops. The species prefers a northwest aspect, but can
be found on west-southwest through north-northeast aspects. Forests surrounding known
occurrences are generally dominated by either red spruce -Fraser fir, northern hardwoods
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW.KCI.COM
with scattered spruce, or high -elevation red oaks. Spreading avens typically occurs in
shallow, acidic soil (such as the Burton series) in cracks and crevices of igneous,
metamorphic, or metasedimentary rocks. Soils may be well drained but almost
continuously wet, with soils at some known occurrences subject to drying out in summer
due to exposure to sun and shallow depths. Known populations occur at elevations
ranging from 4,296 to 6,268 feet above mean sea level. Blue Ridge goldenrod, Heller's
blazing star, and Roan Mountain bluet are a few of its common associate species.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
There is no suitable habitat for spreading avens within the study area. There are no areas
exposed to full sunlight at or above 4,200 feet above mean sea level within the study area.
Elevations in the study area do not exceed 2,600 feet above mean sea level. A review of
the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates no known spreading avens occurrence
within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Carolina Northern flying squirrel
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: May -October; coldest days in coldest winter months
(nest box surveys)
Habitat Description: There are several isolated populations of the Carolina Northern flying
squirrel in the mountains of North Carolina. This nocturnal squirrel prefers the ecotone
between coniferous (red spruce, Fraser fir, or hemlock) and mature northern hardwood
forests (beech, yellow birch, maple, hemlock, red oak, and buckeye), typically at elevations
above 4,500 feet mean sea level. In some instances, the squirrels may be found on narrow,
north -facing valleys above 4,000 feet mean sea level. Both forest types are used to search
for food and the hardwood forest is used for nesting sites. Mature forests with a thick
evergreen understory and numerous snags are most preferable. In winter, squirrels inhabit
tree cavities in older hardwoods, particularly yellow birch.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the Carolina northern flying squirrel does not exist within the study
area. Elevations in the study area do not exceed 2,600 feet above mean sea level. A review
of the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates no known Carolina northern flying
squirrel occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHAUENGE WWW.KCI.COM
Rock gnome lichen
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: year round
Habitat Description: Rock gnome lichen occurs in high elevation coniferous forests (particularly
those dominated by red spruce and Fraser fir) usually on rocky outcrop or cliff habitats.
This squamulose lichen only grows in areas with a great deal of humidity, such as high
elevations above 5,000 feet mean sea level where there is often fog, or on boulders and
large outcrops in deep river gorges at lower elevations. Habitat is primarily limited to
vertical rock faces where seepage water from forest soils above flows only at very wet
times. The species requires a moderate amount of sunlight, but cannot tolerate high -
intensity solar radiation. The lichen does well on moist, generally open sites with northern
exposures, but requires at least partial canopy coverage on southern or western aspects
because of its intolerance to high solar radiation.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the rock gnome lichen does not exist within the study area. Elevations
in the study area do not exceed 2,600 feet above mean sea level. A review of the NCNHP
records, updated July 2020, indicates no known rock gnome lichen occurrence within 1.0
mile of the study area.
Small whorled pogonia
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: mid May -early July
Habitat Description: Small whorled pogonia occurs in young as well as maturing (second to third
successional growth) mixed -deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests. It does not
appear to exhibit strong affinities for a particular aspect, soil type, or underlying geologic
substrate. In North Carolina, the perennial orchid is typically found in open, dry deciduous
woods and is often associated with white pine and rhododendron. The species may also be
found on dry, rocky, wooded slopes; moist slopes; ravines lacking stream channels; or
slope bases near braided channels of vernal streams. The orchid, often limited by shade,
requires small light gaps or canopy breaks, and typically grows under canopies that are
relatively open or near features like logging roads or streams that create long -persisting
breaks in the forest canopy.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable forested habitat for the small whorled pogonia does not exist in the project study
area. The project area is located within the floodplain of Beaverdam Creek. The project
area consists of mowed lawns and forested areas with thick invasive shrubs. A review of
the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates no known small whorled pogonia
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE www.M.coM
Spruce -fir moss spider
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: year round
Habitat Description: This species is known only from spruce -fir forests in the Appalachian
mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee. The spruce -fir moss spider occurs in well -
drained moss and liverwort mats growing on rocks or boulders. These mats are found in
well -shaded areas in mature, high elevation (> 5,000 feet mean sea level) Fraser fir and red
spruce forests. The spruce -fir moss spider is very sensitive to desiccation and requires
environments of high and constant humidity. The need for humidity relates to the moss
mats, which cannot become too parched or else the mats become dry and loose. Likewise,
the moss mats cannot be too wet because large drops of water can also pose a threat to the
spider. The spider constructs its tube -shaped webs in the interface between the moss mat
and the rock surface. Some webs have been found to extend into the interior of the moss
mat.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the spruce -fir moss spider does not exist within the study area.
Elevations in the study area do not exceed 2,600 feet above mean sea level. A review of
the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates no known spruce -fir moss spider
occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Gray bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: May 15-August 15 (summer); January 15-February 15
(winter)
Habitat Description: Gray bats are known mainly from the cave regions of the Southeast and
Midwest. They live in colonies in caves, utilizing different caves for summer roosting and
winter hibernating. Summer caves are usually within one half mile of a river or reservoir,
which provides foraging habitat. During the summer, females give birth and rear the young
in maternity caves, while males and yearlings roost in separate bachelor caves. Caves
preferred for hibernation are typically deep, vertical caves with a temperature between 42
and 52 degrees Fahrenheit. Gray bats are highly selective in choosing suitable caves, and
nine known caves are thought to provide hibernation space for 95 percent of the population.
Migration from summer to winter caves begins in September and is mainly complete by
the beginning of November.
Biological Conclusion: May affect, but not likely to adversely affect
There are no caves or other suitable roosting structures for the gray bat within the project
area. A review of the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates one known gray bat
occurrence (EO 39834) within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE www.M.CoM
Northern long-eared bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1 — August 15
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the
mountains, with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North
Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. During the summer, NLEB
roosts singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and\or
dead trees (typically >3 inches dbh). Males and non -reproductive females may also roost
in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds, under eaves of buildings, behind window shutters, in
bridges, and in bat houses. Foraging occurs on forested hillsides and ridges, and
occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along tree -lined corridors. Mature
forests may be an important habitat type for foraging.
Biological Conclusion: May affect, but not likely to adversely affect
The site contains potential summer roosting habitat for the NLEB. According to the
USFWS data, last updated September 4, 2018, the site is not located within a watershed
with known NLEB maternity trees or hibernation sites. The Beaverdam Creek Dam
Removal project is located approximately 9 miles from the nearest watershed with known
NLEB sites. A review of the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates no known
NLEB occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area. The project involves a dam removal
and stream bank stabilization. This work may involve the removal of one or two trees in
order to stabilize the banks of Beaverdam Creek.
Indiana bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1 — August 15
Habitat Description: The range of the Indian bat centers on cavernous limestone regions in the
eastern United States. The Indiana bat has different summer and winter habitat
requirements. Winter habitat is in caves and abandoned mines that usually have standing
water on the floor. The bats migrate to the winter habitat between September and
November; they stay there with occasional periods of activity until they emerge in mid -
March to early May. Hibernation only occurs in regions where winter temperatures are
stable and around 40 degrees Fahrenheit. Suitable summer habitat includes roosting,
foraging, and commuting areas. Summer roosting habitat includes forests and woodlots
containing potential roost trees, which have exfoliating bark, cracks, or crevices in trees
(alive or dying) or snags that are > 3 inches diameter -at -breast height (dbh). Roosting
habitat may contain dense or loose aggregates of trees with variable amounts of canopy
closure. (While any tree greater than 3" dbh has the potential to be Indiana bat summer
roosting habitat, solid stands of 3" dbh and smaller trees are not considered suitable
roosting habitat; suitable roosting habitat would generally consist of forest patches with
Employee -Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWWACLCOM
larger trees also present.) Bridges are occasionally used for roosting by Indiana bats in the
summer.
Foraging habitat consists of forested patches, wooded riparian corridors, and natural
vegetation adjacent to these areas. Commuting habitat includes wooded tracts, tree -lines,
wooded hedgerows, streams or other such pathways that are within or connected to roosting
or foraging areas. Streams that have been stripped of their riparian vegetation do not appear
to offer suitable foraging habitat. Rivers as foraging areas and as migration routes are
extremely important to this species.
Biological Conclusion: May affect, but not likely to adversely affect
The site contains potential summer roosting and foraging habitat for the Indiana bat. The
project involves a dam removal and stream bank stabilization. This work may involve the
removal of several trees in order to stabilize the banks of Beaverdam Creek. A review of
the NCNHP records, updated July 2020, indicates no known Indiana bat occurrence within
1.0 mile of the study area.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (919) 278-2533 or
Joe. Sullivan@kci.com.
Sincerely,
KCI Associates of North Carolina
mten
Joseph Sullivan
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
- Figure 1: Vicinity Map
- Figure 2: USGS Map
- Figure 3: Aerial Imagery Map
- Site Photographs
- NCNHP Potential Occurrences Letter
Empluyec-Owned Since 1988
RISE TO THE CHALLENGE WWW ACLCOM
Pace LOOP `
SO �
S
u
de Rd r
�e
Carains Blvd
0
0
0
a
Old C ydc Rp a
Project Area
KCI
,1tiSOCIATB OF NC
New Clyde Hwy
dL
N1
%3
'St
�5
Qso
1r�
y r
� 2
Q
o ndg�
l *-
��0
canton
S%
N
W E
s
Birch 4
CIO
^ep)y 9%
Pe"landO Johnsp,
O$ N Or
SchoolRC/ St
0.5 0.25 0 0.5
Miles
Map created 7131120
Image Source: ESRI
Wodd Street Map
�WNIUMEME1111111�
s
A
c ie a
E
O
�F 7s?
r
e
Asn�„lipe tWV
A
s
Ostnut Mint-311` _
a
c
n
�a
z
n
G�
0A.
��ttec
e
G
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Haywood County
Z µ0
i THiC [EfY kD 0S5
NA .,AAS-f`.cD z 31gVf'oDAAf f,-
' n
x a
Q D A
W '
fg'
`cJy • �. 4 �. xi � tyORif{Qb yrR'EI)
N Cant- -
dl - r Ekm ScW
Z
aJ
C
/ � . pa qE► aF �BEF ' .'
• ,0 " •'vt�D st t z
YO6., :; 3 � 3s r( W+NES OR --------------- .r...
t 2
YZ 4pE i i, PLEMMONS ST
0
• pry ..,1 �{�G�
a. . ry nayH't
SrUART ST �9;:
p
rf �r`5 4 t
(4Y
OEVEIN Si O t•P : 'pn :n,. "tt.E G1 1110
LOWE ST
0 "' _ _ Cantnn
is
OLD CL v,F,40
41
ti
b w
��— N 1, 000 500 0 1, 000
—� Figure 2: USGS Map
W E Feet Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Project Area
Map created 7/31/20 Haywood County
K C I
s Image Source: Canton
ASSOCIATES OF NC
USGS 1:24000 Quadrangle Map
- - � 1• 1F P • .'' ; ` � y Pik _ X~'
i�
Y, �' of < g� 111 �....' I� ♦`
4 � � � _gin . • � � �:�� D,.a -
xALI''
KWWNMM`
nmmmpa�
WEMF4�
mmmd�
wffmmmlb�
MWNNMM&�
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTR UCTION MANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone 919-783-9214 • Fax 919-783-9266
1. 09/12/16 - View of dam looking upstream.
2. 11/08/16 -View of dam looking upstream from western bank.
THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM \\'N\'\\'. K( I.,
3. O1/20/17 -Side view of the dam from the western bank.
4. 03/01/17 -View upstream of the dam taken from the western bank.
THE MOST IN(REDIBEE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEN \\ \\ )A . K( 1. c 0111
04/22/20 - View of Beaverdam Creek flowing overtop the dam from eastern bank.
I is
6. 04/22/20 - View of Beaverdam Creek flowing overtop dap looking upstream.
THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM \N X% NN . K ( I. c 0\1
0
w WIN Roy Cooper. Governor
near � NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton. Secretary
memos NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Names Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
N C N H DE-12562
July 28, 2020
Joe Sullivan
KCI Technologies, Inc.
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal; KCI
Dear Joe Sullivan:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
k++-.e-•/A........ F,.,icf(lffirnc rfm7ctatnr�nr'iA-Z7
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butlerCabncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
0 121 W JONES STREET, RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALE1G1i NC 27699
OFC 919.707 9120 • FAX 919 707 9121
Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Project No. KCI
July 28, 2020
NCNHDE-12562
Element Occurrences
Documented
Within a One
-mile Radius of the Project
Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Amphibian
18092
Cryptobranchus
Eastern Hellbender
2019-11-05
BC
3-Medium
---
Special
G3T2
S3
alleganiensis
Concern
alleganiensis
Freshwater
13495
Alasmidonta
Appalachian Elktoe
2018-11-20
B
3-Medium
Endangered
Endangered
GI
Sl
Bivalve
raveneliana
Freshwater
23485
Lampsilis fasciola
Wavyrayed
2018-11-20
E
3-Medium
---
Special
G5
S2
Bivalve
Lampmussel
Concern
Freshwater Fish26671
Percina squamata
Olive Darter
2014-05-21
E
3-Medium
---
Special
G3
S2
Concern
Mammal
39834
Myotis grisescens
Gray Bat
2018-10-13
E
2-High
Endangered
Endangered
G4
Sl
Mayfly
34623
Tsalia berneri
a mayfly
1999-12-15
H?
3-Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Vascular Plant
23933
Hackelia virginiana
Virginia Stickseed
1968-Pre
H
5-Very
---
Significantly
G5
S2
Low
Rare
Peripheral
Vascular Plant
23969
Orbexilum onobrychis
Lanceleaf Scurfpea
1891-07-17
H
5-Very
---
Special
G5
SH
Low
Concern
Historical
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
FRB/Pigeon River Aquatic Habitat R3 (High) C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Funded NC DNCR, Clean Water Management Trust State
Project Fund
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos//ncnhde natureserve.ora/helo. Data query generated on July 28. 2020: source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database
Page 2 of 3
July 28, 2020
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Q
Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-12562: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal
Page 3 of 3
1:20,817
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sowees: Esn, HERE, Garmn, Irmwanrap, incnwrwd P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBsse. IGN, Kedaster Nl. Ordnance Survey, Esn ,Npan,
METI, Esri China (Hoop "). (c) OpanSErow"p contrMdon, and the GIS
User Comnsmily
t '
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
May 5, 2017
Joseph Sullivan
KCI Associates of NC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Beaverdam Creek Dam Removal, 328 Champion Drive, Canton, Haywood County, ER 17-0646
Dear Mr. Sullivan:
Thank you for your letter of March 31, 2017, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review(d,)ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
�°✓Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: (919) 807-6570/807-6599