090039_Inspection_20201027

'- GSivision of Water Resources . . ,_
Facility Number ° t - 3 Qt. ' 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: er ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: eigutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:VDD 7 Arrival Time: - f, OZ Departure Time: % ! 3•0 County: 5 .; ...-- Region: F"--K
Farm Name: 7kk 6-i02)0Llz- Fae '3 Owner Email:
1.
Owner Name: N r a/0)0-5 el.r-v Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: e',,tir a5 �.1�.ecitt}�.e..'!` Title: l . _ -c- • Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
,Design Current Design Current `Design Current
Swine. . 'Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. : Cattle - °Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
L.-'eeder to Finish 751/L f Z 7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca•aci Poi. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish 11111 Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
U
Other-_ A •Turke Poults _
Other II Other ��
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? . ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: / D z7--
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes .! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /9
Observed Freeboard(in): / „
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 20 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation pose's an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [/"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ l<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): :/.3 /722tA&L J c
13. Soil Type(s): ,O,/'Y—Dfr"\
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? lales ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [l]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes afio ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 ' 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 3 9 Date of Inspection: % _' 7-
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes f o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes []' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop.a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IZINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? U.Yes 1io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes I4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes lalo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes BNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [`J ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes LJ 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments'(refer to questibult)::Explain any°YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.;:
Use drawings of facility Whetter explain situations(use additional pages as necessary),'
G1'063 1 12 r,€5 Ftfier- •- G /J'z c t zi€adz-d.20 J./eV-Z.4-rd
Malty fee/PPL- /(- 11._./ 777 r-"-621
if- © LA vr1 1 f pia v� ekS 7
eon
r ? /
-74
ffe
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 7�,.e-e g17 p' Phone: ?-/2:: z5 Pf,�/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /p,7 2z?e
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015