090020_Inspection_20201014

�� - 0 Division of Water.Resources S L( 11f M
.FaciI t`y l 'umber 7 p'2t) . € 0 Divisiofn o Soil.and'Prater Conservation
Other. gen�y `,
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other. 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:L-2- 0 I Departure Time:1 RI(100 County: j per- Region:
Farm Name: yit M - Owner Email:
Owner Name: fAl for- , 1)/ 2 1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: •
Facility Contact: eGe."71s 4;_a 1C Title: Z /� fie, Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,e,t 2.-e1 /_ ij Integrator: 5;1fr` ..7 1
Certified Operator: /rat),5 �j/'UWK.- Certification Number: /0Q9;.0
Backup Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current ; Design Current ° '1Desggn Currrent
m
Sine` ` Capacity 'op - ' 4'etPoultry Capacity Pop Catile , Capacity ,�- oii
, ,=,, a ,e m ,e q), -. . . _. - , , _, , , _ , ,. . , IIw� _ -
Wean to Finish � Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to. Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish f /5- ,' Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean / D i Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder 03 PoulJ _Ca s ad ' Po Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish • -- 3 Beef Stocker
:,_: Gilts , •Non-La ers -°E„_r Beef Feeder
Boars ;•Pullets �� -- Beef Brood Cow
--
Others __ 2 a .r - ; •Turke Poults ,t
r : Other -:•Other
s ". :-�:.= s»t;, a _ .VW,.-' r "�"£ � a =� = n`^,<-�. LL. ---, ^.d _. _ ,_ . _<._ o- s., N 1 : ,.�. ..,a._s 9 .eau
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ' ❑ Yes lal< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1211.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: -1 Date of Inspection: /U--/��A)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes I�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / 9 /f /9'
I 7
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 124ires ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [l]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑/Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes IE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Inv/NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to,install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: c' - Date of Inspection: /'—/Gf.;10.s3
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Erces ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: , \' JCf/Loe /0
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Et No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes El4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA El NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes II I M ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question`#)-Explain any YES answers and/or any additional:recommendations or any other:coirimentw::-
Use drawings of facility Whetter explain situations'(use additional pages as necessary):
•7 i.k bocrdd-2a3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: S7�r_`� ( • Phone: 91G230—045 I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: A?�� >
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015