090016_Inspection_20201027

ivision of Water Resources e�mc� s I iz
Facility Number - / O Division of Soil and Water Conservation „,� . ,.4f 1
a,, = O Other Agency
Type of Visit: .®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: allicutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I/0— Arrival Time:1/D;l7'O Departure Time:1 //11 1E1 County: lovi 1- Region: e 0
Farm Name: oL.„,`�we y 6„,-0,L, Owner Email:
Owner Name: leaf ✓ / Q/'4�S 1/C- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: L
Facility Contact: bt d'� ,Z�r/L rU7< Title: . , Phone:
Onsite Representative: �Ge--g-Q--- Integrator: /�? ,-:a
Certified Operator: /Oh ✓irt.5a---...., Certification Number: ,,ev bri
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
-: Design Current - : Design Current :Design Current
Swine Capacity."`'`Pop Wet Poultry ;,Capacity Pop: Cattle. ;Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder , Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish )cf0 /9' } . . ,„ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean / Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D 'Poultr Ca•ad Po.;_ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish :'o- EMI.= Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars ..Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
•
Other ' •Turke Poults .
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 11The ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7- /'(,, Date of Inspection: %
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): f 9
Observed Freeboard(in): /3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ (o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
•
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require I't' es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): f"7Gs �D ae, ?-7-1(
13. Soil Type(s): Ai0//,/'o7/
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes {/�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? L I G' ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes ;'j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes DYo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Qlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: '- /(.0 'Date of Inspection: /2 p`
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,checks ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: / /17'ma n ///
c% s
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes E 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 6o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I2Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Et ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes lago ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explaineany YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other'comments.
UseJrawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
bore_
/ __ T? ide 'o b-r- Sied' -ev c fr—)I e,ra-6 5
t„--ee*:?_
1/./b 'yt-45 *'S
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: //62-'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015