The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About090005_Inspection_20201014 n .. Division of•Water-Resources s 0 S Kf yl e Facility Number 5 j ` 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservationo ' r1 e . 0 Other.Agency , .,, t w f Type of Visit: e-Crompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: /C3—f 1-70 Arrival Time: /"45--- Departure Time:(573 O County: D`--00L'— Region: i 7.JC) Farm Name: firrvr(',4,. Cery Owner Email: Owner Name: //27 . radr s , ' j r- CLn/,n a Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: diw7s 3/'tu)LZ Title: et., ....e.. Phone: Onsite Representative: - Integrator: Certified Operator: ,1::)c,A V ; j'l S011— Certification Number: ,(r Dg----/ Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current . Design Current Design Current Swine °Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry = Capacity 3op.°`P ',. Cattle. Capacity Pop. , v/Wean to Finish / O3 .Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf _ Feeder to Finish _ Dairy,Heifer Farrow to Wean - ., Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder D Pout Ca•ad Po i. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish MEMEMIIII-- Beef Stocker , Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder Boars ; •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow Other _ Turke Poults Other II Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: f D-/L('•-mac Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: hrJw-✓ -- t ' �' Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): ii'1- Observed Freeboard(in): (ppq 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) '6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IZ N ❑ NA El NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes ,- No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN>10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): cx, 13.Soil Type(s): re-r I 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes jo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Q Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes In"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes El<o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Lease Agreements ['Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ['Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [/]N ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: 7 Date of Inspection: /0—( i f 2 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ago ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [24 o ❑ NA ❑ NE • and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes E J1S110 ❑ NA ❑ NE ' permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L d \lo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Application Field ' ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [2]No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings;offacility to better explain-:situations(use additional pages as necessary). _ Petzi /4ou.5f /ate �� u L 70 7e L A //e2, f�� S7t� f i12 20 Wad A27 iFIV- Reviewer/Inspector Name: o'zi Phone: 2/0 3(7,; (5-1 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /Q/ Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015