830010_Inspection_20201119

LD Division of Water Resources 1\ 1 HMG
Facility Number Qj 3 - j p 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 1112�12Q
0 Other Agency 1
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1111 20 Arrival Time: 9 `j6 Departure Time: a,r County: 9artigh 4 Region: pro
Farm Name: RIM F 1 1--m Owner Email:
Owner Name: rrn 6\ T 1 1 r 1 S 11 C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: curb c t3C W 1 UK Title: TeC CjPC , Phone:
Onsite Representative: me Integrator: JI 8,I tti f @ j 4
e r (�-1.Certified Operator: Le � n Certification Number: j 00 1 9-a0
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
V Wean to Finish 10013 10(pgjc' Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish _ _Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
•Turkeys
Other _Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes yi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE -,
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:B%5 - 10 Date of Inspection: lip Tl
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I a '
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): I 1 I ! j 7 17 I 7
Observed Freeboard(in): a.a- ag- ...kP v3- 7 0
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? J] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes rgl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
-.:'. ❑ Outside of Acceptable CropWindow ❑ Evidencei// of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
�1
12.Crop Type(s): €1 I ! 1LJd g i1q,7J, QV el-5-Q-2
13. Soil Type(s): JfC&fl)1 8I af'oh) NO[4(0) L ncht2UtJ
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Z] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ® No n NA El NE
acres determination? 77��
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Ig No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes CO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 7°" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ' ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 16-6 - ID Date of Inspection: i I/j 7i 2p
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [4 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check [d Yes ❑ No El NA n NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
®Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon 2 f
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: L 1c:i con 0- "J 11/ i 3 I 1 ry
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 5ZI No El NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 52:1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes al No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 17 No ❑ NA "❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 13EI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond . ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes `tom No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessara.
iX We Dregs . diTulid fe 1g oons. �#9 dre are�5 qre . cunrse
Oh Lc) � h
PuUU IA-- cc G\.179oSc. to be berCn vol q by{- there C5 1\0
szN11.-Mce--. of g-errmicta wito 11-00h .c)
-wir.; No purnobq Sh001
Be- °Pimpf ,e Crap
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Mil E �b t-Q ho ��_� Phone: I I d- `J"o,q
j Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C�/�{,�� "I� � Date: i i �1 zv
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015