Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
830008_Inspection_20201119
Cr—Division of Water Resources 61 me Kf li(23 Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: OfCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: iry-749--- 9, Arrival Time: � � Departure Time: v�� County Region: j /w Farm Name: o y- Owner Email: Owner Name: u GS Fs2d (/G Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 9 Tee./ Title: ���'c tr Phone: c v� Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: �',�r 3/DC" Certification Number: f ' / � Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish /7/,G//2750 Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ElNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes D 1Ve ❑ NA .❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: 5; - © Date of Inspection: /-- i 1EWP/, Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ld4o ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 316 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA El NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes , rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ' ❑ Yes 2' o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): -, � /e9c./r1/20 --4 13. Soil Type(s): �� r� �� Y j 2� Y L�i'�r.�lf/i// ' 7E‹' 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [l]No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [r]No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 121<o ❑ NA. ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E<To ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [l]N ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes LE N ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: , - � Date of Inspection: / 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes l lac ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 12Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ‹ ❑ NA n NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 4 ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes El<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Er-N.-Cr❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). soil 57 -•-4-1) 7f DA7--1_5 u 1-(CCD de ttt 8z e)rte., l • Reviewer/Inspector Name: V -en di- Phone: W12-3P3 `!J" [ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date:( O14f[ Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015