780078_Inspection_20201021

= - - Ic -vision of Water Resources 3 . I U l S l
Facility Number 79 -° 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation t
_ x°v a Q Other Agency °
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I/072/WO Arrival Time:I/1 ;00 Departure Time: , 140 County: S f Region: U
Farm Name: L 2 Jet ,S2.::::ez.` ( 9L — ,- ... Owner Email:
Owner Name: Oezej7 ci e-gA upe Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: emc/-t3 Wdd'a./i G"l` Title: -77;e/L G i Phone:
Onsite Representative: �c�� Integrator: [9'd
Certified Operator: :_i_) ;el , () u-_4 Certification Number: f() ( 3 / l
Backup Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current ° Design Current Design Current
.Swine Capacity: Pop Wet Poultry ' Capacity Pop fir Cattle `'-`Capacity ;Pop.
__ Wean to Finish ,Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish C) 5Z7 i Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow ,
Farrow to Feeder D -Poult Ca 1 aci Po 1. _ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker
Gilts II Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
'Boars II Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults °
Other NI Other ��
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
•
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 7 741,--- Date of Inspection: /l)"
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3k,
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes O'FTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Erles ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
©'6utside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): e 0-0 / ivc n /`'ijk- / �Jri ='L� .O''91/tde -- /tc'Yo',4 r-e-/
13. Soil Type(s): J -M -//.--17 /,Vo,1- /‘ -
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? IT ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Ergio ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Erclo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes lagC; ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. I. -Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑We kly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking Crop Yield l2r(r Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes g. ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [hi Ehl< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 70-"- 7rr' Date of Inspection; /O 2,1- Lt2
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes p'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [/]1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 17I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes -Ni ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer yto questzon#):!Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recon mendations or any othe comments
Use drawings°of.facility<to better explain situations(use additional=,'pages as necessa y)
j l4 ✓- i'�/ Gd y 5L J�Y��` - r
gee-4e 54eez_le-r- Op4zti (-7-°'"'
47 oho '7e -5-71
Cep •
f t.!'cdQj -e. ��. c�'D��"
y NY �a d77 iLGGi'S'
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: /19 ...?'-D(b 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: p1D /-C7�-0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015