78077_Inspection_20201119

Division of Water Resources g�mC, f 1112.3
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: O'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: el-Confine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:17/--/Y--- Vb Arrival Time: ;W" Departure Time: , i,G7 County: vz Region:
Farm Name: 6 O '7at7k /1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: C'i `joi)( ()C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �e1'7 3 3 6l4�!`C Title: 4.477 � Phone:
Onsite Representative: 5l' Integrator:
Certified Operator: -1--; fi. 0r225— Certification Number: I )c :3 i f Lf
Back-up Operator: `.may 7)fowl& Certification Number: / Do / : 7
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 9/1VP 900 Dairy Heifer
_Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
•
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? • ❑ Yes ©'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters-of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ON o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7< 7 7 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / J?
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 12r<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop pWindow ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): U-t' X%e4 /6 '
e1/5-z---rd
13.Soil Type(s): 76-F9
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes alo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes I_I1-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 12-1‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 12-3.(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
.19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lErN<o-
0 NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q"No< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,.check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [21-N-C-: ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes �o El NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 79< 77 Date of Inspection: / -/,-- 2-4.9
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. -
I]Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes io/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [�]'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes D'IV( ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 12K ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ram,' �S G •� /J w /�� r �c
•
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � %% r c� ti 1 �V1 0 Phone: 2iG2•--303-1:97
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tviat Date: /1Y1,0.)
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015