780037_Inspection_20201021

vision of Water Resources ( ()
Facility Number 7f - 3, ° 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation" � - rr--
I
" Y
4 0 Other Agency =
Type of Visit: O'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /©' Arrival Time: , ?:Ord Departure Time: , ;1, County: Fdr ' Region: r 7)
Farm Name: to bc_ ,51r.,z1'y l-/ a�,S r- i Owner Email:
Owner Name: <j Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 47--- cAad(/l./Pcl TitleZ:, Phone:
Onsite Representative: �j�r�- Integrator: � ,ei
Certified Operator: Z.:L.--Aae>: LA_S-.- Certification Number: j 1.. ,
Back-up Operator: Certification Number;
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
` Design Current Design Current ,. - Design' Current,
Swine ..ry.' E:Capacity Pop. `� -Wet Poultry , Capacity Pop.= . Cattle s °,Eti. Capacity '' Pop':
Wean to Finish - Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer _ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 3_,j 3t/32- Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current ` Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder •D - Poul Ca'aci Po'. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I MIEEME -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers - ; Beef Feeder
Boars NI Pullets Beef Brood Cow
IIIIRME
Other •Turke Poults
Other II Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes L lTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 70' - 3 7 (Date of Inspection: /0—,,9 - ? 7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / /-
Observed Freeboard(in): (3C.
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
•
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes L 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Y s El No El NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0'No El NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Q-l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes al< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes El No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN El PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Q Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): doe/ /js7/?r� , // i, r /.5r-"rit
J ae" c, / ) - -d,
13. Soil Type(s): 1 fj/-/i3 t/' '
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes io El NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? es 0 No El NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable El Yes ❑-No El NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes No ❑ NA El NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [J-NQo ❑ NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Qalo El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
El WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. 'es ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El W ekly Freeboard ElWaste Analysis ElSoil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ElWeather Code
ElRainfall ElStocking GCrop Yield argMinute Inspections ElMonthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections IllSludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes ETo ❑ NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA El NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7, - 3 7 Date of Inspection: /Q?/ r
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes E-go ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q'�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ 1 Igo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Erg; ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Q-1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings-of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
MU
(o9-t-77 it'e W :j,
to ho �c)��- 23 6 51 dz.p mks,-
Wa 4,13/17 te/C_ Tr7 a}V/ zio 6./141
c esj y D e-C do /U D` 10-e f oz:� ^r.o `, YJ'v2__ cl /62�e 27--
M 1777-nYs
Ovial CieDr yr r101S %n
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Yie-A-P �-8 Phone: ���b�Z/S 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /0 2 —Z2.&oj
Page3of3 2/4/2015