470026_Inspection_20201119

•Division of Water Resources $1 MS K V- 1112
Facility Number in - 2(P 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®;Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: • 19:•jb Arrival Time: ci: 1'U Departure Time: ' 3D I County: e Ii ode Region: prO
Farm Name: C)w f h e fe I i e c Li,C Owner Email:
Owner Name: L m ci t\ tM ODd ci II Phone:
Mailing Address: -
Physical Address: / '
Facility Contact: C Jt U G (jC I-WI C1< Title:`. eC Gre C Phone:
•
Onsite Representative: Jq me Integrator: Cjrnj+Vie/4
Certified Operator: Lee B 1 v U I I Certification Number: 100 I gbO
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
1C Feeder to Finish 1 V ii0 1 600 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts , Non-Layers Beef Feeder '
Boars - - Pullets . Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts .
1.Is any,discharge observed from any part of the operation? r - ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? r ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA. ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass,the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [!]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No LI NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? -
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: ills /20
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [I N n NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? EtY s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [Z]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window i�❑ Evidenceidr� of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Berrnudc1 t oV erJeec a Cotton
13.Soil Type(s): C� d'��� \ V ®��� L� Fe/oh d o-f1 -o
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes La1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 2 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [('No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 141 - ,(p Date of Inspection: Ili I 1 J 24
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check lyi Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
4 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ���D�9_ �I� iI I a.
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ]',
lit
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes II No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Erl\To E NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 12 to ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 12Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ea' To ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 1Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
LvoTA ��vp Pk-, s, Gi����5 ��o�
6,----r--6_,qi--,,,-T;,"._ 0,1----i, f-----. 1.70,, ,p___
P �`1 ri
e Fo h t-e p 01 Phone: q—t(�7C) --d�,�7
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: kcct'(_ --a- - Date: II 117 NO
Page 3 of 3 v 2/4/2015