820728_Inspection_20200825

TA,S S ,A-v t5I3
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number V a - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: W 1 -p�� Arrival Time: IC 11-Ua 4- Departure Time: //,/d 4 County: S4 r56 Region: F41
Farm Name: . S AI `! tva� �Gf�1L� btQ.L-y L4 C5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: S [Ai50tA Fz.vvnil 1-LC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Cu 4,c I`,2 i CC/L Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: _ Q co mc,L lAiaArv-e to Certification Number: 1 a ` 2"
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:(t (LLongitude:
CY'(9c5 "I-t o'`l. M'J.MM I r�,'t- Cvt �u�C Kitt ) f`cc�►�1 O-, g
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean S Zo 2 33 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
•
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
-Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application'Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No 1A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 0-NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 9 NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA El NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters El Yes [ 'No ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e `7,6- Date of Inspection: 7e)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes []moo❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑- ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [L]'go ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0.-K ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): G 6 Sv l/(A) 1�
13. Soil Type(s): lZ ei Co / )I to V'
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [v(Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [-1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes L j4 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents �
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes la1`e ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I J"1(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Ej - 7 at, Date of Inspection: L5 4V&' -7819
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes (o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 0' 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes a‹o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Q1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility tobetter explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CotfP
5 /IA ce-` E‘,6 .z-c
f
c;2 c 0 vel21trut,vS .I-) ti v0101-e It)
,22/
/6)..a 4;3 -ft gait-LOA-1 4- 14
ZZ (
l `
tia,c`A. ev(-0,t - 0 S 14-6 C�S' ' 7 ��t�' Rtxua;ifil-eSt1y '
c+c(ace-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: V)) 1 u l Phone: �C,O1 "333 t
c r,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (, (S�M�20e Date: 3.5 4-1)
( `ly
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015