820725_Inspection_20200731

0l5ivision of Water Resources 1� +�v /� ...zap
=3"
Facility Number V - Division of Soil and Water Conser��ation tT �
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: e'Com lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: '(d'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 31 (1y 20 Arrival Time:MIMI Departure Time: y: 5 ./9 County: 54I(P40 IA) Region:'F_4 Y
Farm Name: I-, a e- -c._ { D t-V&5 t LL 1- ( Owner Email:
Owner Name: CV heLP ht- A v r any\vt5 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Ctyci I S 6 a (WtCJ( Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: L ( Integrator: I ey41-o'� 6-
Certified Operator: � � t
tip 9-•-3 ' Certification Number: (/�Sfi
ll
Back-up Operator: V ( e / pa,„,,ay Certification Number: / 0 6) 6 S 70
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish t 0 '-v--- Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other _Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0,-Nti❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: ..
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes E No in4IIA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No D NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: V'L - 2-0 Date of Inspection: at jz
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes IIL>Fer ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 'Z.1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes gye- ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑-I ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ KO- ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C �� d -Hattnn
13. Soil Type(s): j f (� tI 1- f Uv yil
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1Z1,310 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes al o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ED No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes `��!� ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 1 �-6 "" ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes DA., ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ? Z •- Date of Inspection: 3(.s tt 7820
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZLINd6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 0'�° ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Et-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ©'1Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ZLINft5- ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EI 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Wi h r� Cj(` 1`vts reed c9"i. a. ILL`E1,.
G-d( Gt l b -- 51
AlReviewer/Inspector Name: � 1�l n I�V�,�(.� Phone:'�1/ ` � `.� �� '333
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:• j _r, [ -�j4 Date: ' 7� 7
Page 3 of 3 0 2/4/2015 1