WQ0082821_Complete File - Historical_20171231

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
431 MINUET LANE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28217
P.O. BOX 240674
April 16, 1991 CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28224-0674
704-527-6717
C.Dr%p
ZZ
OrCoAzlff
Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
P.O. Box 26234
Richmond, VA 23260 APR 8 1991
DIVISIONr
Attention: Mr. Hilton M. Withers' MOOfrfStrl�� t„ r't ``f " r' 1 1'cfh1 ANA
L1f REGIONAL Err
Manager, Environmental Affairs NAL OfF10E -
Subject: Report of Phase III -A Ground -Water Assessment
Southern States Fertilizer Plant
Statesville, North Carolina
LEI Job No. 56-9606.80
Gentlemen:
As authorized by your acceptance of our proposal contained in our December 21, 1990
submittal entitled "Proposed Phase III Ground -Water Assessment Cost Estimate", Law
Environmental, Inc. has completed the proposed Phase III -A ground -water assessment
activities at the Southern States Fertilizer Plant in Statesville, North Carolina. The purpose
of. our work was to provide additional response to a Notice of Violation for the site issued
on December 12, 1989 and a May 4, 1990 letter, both by the North Carolina Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR). Phase III-B activities
include work which may be required' after NCDEHNR reviews this submittal. This report
summarizes our understanding of the background information, our field investigation.
procedures and laboratory testing results, and our data interpretation and recommendations.
In summary, a concentration of nitrate/nitrite in ground -water was encountered in the newly
constructed monitoring well (K65WTI"), but at a level significantly lower than
concentrations previously detected at shallower sampling depths. Based on this finding, Law
Environmental proposes to terminate assessment activities, continue efforts to close former
Holding Ponds No. 1 and No. 2, and continue to monitor ground -water conditions. After
pond closure and two years of monitoring, we believe that significant reductions should be
noted in nitrate/nitrite concentrations at the site. Detailed information regarding our
findings and recommendations is presented herein.

Southern States Cooperative, Inc.
April 16, 1991
Page 2
Law Environmental appreciates the opportunity to provide our professional consulting
services on this phase of the project. If you have any questions regarding this report please
feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Bernard B. Schumak
Project Hydrogeologist
Thomas F. Beggs, P.E.
Principal
BBS:TFB:clp
Attachments
cc: Mr. J. David Tucker
W.R. Grace & Co.

'I
REPORT OF
PHASE III -A GROUND -WATER ASSESSMENT
FOR SOUTHER STATES FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
!! Prepared for:
Southen States Cooperative, Inc.
chmond, Virginia
II, by:
Law Environmental, Inc.
Cha otte, North Carolina
it
April 16, 1991
LE j Job No. 56-9606.80

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION .................................. 1-1
1.1 Background Summary .................................. 1-1
1.2 Notice of Violation .................................... 1-2
2.0 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES .................................. 2-1
2.1 Monitoring Well Installation ............................. 2-1
2.2 Ground -Water Sampling ................................ 2-2
2.3 Surface -Water Sampling ................................ 2-3
3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................ 3-1
4.0 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES ........................ 4-1
4.1 Ground -Water Analysis ................................. 4-1
4.2 Surface -Water Analysis ................................. 4-2
5.0 EXPOSURE STUDY ....................................... 5-1
5.1 Pathways Information .................................. 5-1
5.1.1 Existing Maps ................................. 5-1
5.1.2 Ground -Water Usage ........................... 5-1
5.1.3 Surface -Water Usage ............................ 5-2
5.2 Well Survey and County Well Sampling Review ............... 5-3
5.2.1 Vehicular Reconnaissance ........................ 5-3
5.2.2 Well Construction Record Review .................. 5-5
5.2.3 County Health Services Well
Sampling Review ............................. 5-6
6.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION .................... 6-1
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................... 7-1
8.0 QUALIFICATION OF REPORT .............................. 8-1
TABLES
FIGURES
APPENDIX - GROUND -WATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION RECORD
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
LABORATORY TEST DATA REPORTS
COPIES OF WELL RECORDS
INFLOW PERMEABILITY TESTING

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
1.1 Background Summary
The Southern States Fertilizer Plant is located on U.S. Highway 70 approximately six miles
east of Statesville, North Carolina (see Figure 1). We understand that the facility was
constructed in the 1950's. Southern States Cooperative, Inc. purchased the plant from W.
R. Grace & Co. in February, 1988.
Various farm and garden fertilizers are manufactured at the plant using raw materials
brought in by truck and rail. The materials are usually off-loaded directly onto conveyor
belts for transfer to storage areas within the plant.
Finished products are warehoused on site pending shipment. Small warehouse areas at the
north end of the main plant and in a small building just east of the main plant are also used
to store pre -mixed, bagged products on pallets. These products are sold direct to consumers
without modification by Southern States.
The manufacturing facility is currently self-contained; process water is recirculated within
the plant without exterior discharge. This is possible because air scrubbers are used to
reduce smokestack emissions. The scrubbers use a "wet" system and the scrubber water is
consumed in the granulation process.
1-1

Prior to changes in scrubber design. approximately ten years ago, process water was
discharged from time to time. Drainage was to the former holding ponds located
approximately 1,000 ft southwest of the plant. Two other ponds have reportedly been
closed. One of these was located due east of the plant (near Well K65W6" F") and was
reportedly closed approximately twenty years ago. The other was located 300 ft southeast
of the plant (near Well K65W6) and was reportedly closed approximately five years ago.
Modifications to plant processes have been implemented over the past several years, and
waste products appear to be appropriately contained within the manufacturing facility.
A spill control review was conducted by Law Environmental in February, 1990. The report
concluded that the plant possessed adequate spill containment facilities, and the likelihood
of a significant spill appeared to be low.
A general site location plan is presented in the attached Figure 1. Site topography and
specific features are presented in Figures 2 and 3.
1.2 Notice of Violation
Southern States Cooperative retained Law Environmental in September, 1989 to assist with
evaluation and remediation efforts at the Statesville Fertilizer Plant. On December 121
1989, the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) issued a Notice of Violation for the site.
1-2

The notice stated that excessive concentrations of nitrate and/or nitrite had been discovered
in two NCDEHNR wells at the site. Combined nitrate/nitrite concentrations were greater
than the threshold value of 11 mg/I set forth in Title 15, Subchapter 2L, Section .0202 (g)
of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 2L). The notice required
submission of specific technical and field data documenting the ground -water conditions
within 60 days.
On January 19, 1990, representatives of Southern States Cooperative and Law
Environmental met with Messrs. Jesse Wells and Jeff Lautier at the NCDEHNR
Mooresville office. It was agreed that Law Environmental would construct six ground -water
monitoring wells at the site. Two of the wells would be extended to bedrock (defined as
auger refusal) and four would be shallow monitoring wells intended to address the lateral
extent of contamination. (Please refer to Law Environmental's February 5, 1990 letter
outlining the proposed field work.) This initial well installation work was conducted during
the period of January 30 through February 7, 1990.
A response to the December 12, 1989 Notice of Violation was presented in Law's Phase I
Ground -Water Assessment Report dated March 29, 1990 (LEI Job No. 56-9606.40).
Additional ground -water assessment was recommended.
1-3

On May 4, 1990, the State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) issued a letter to Southern States Cooperative, Inc. The
letter indicated that the NCDEHNR Mooresville Regional Office had reviewed Law
Environmental's Phase I Ground -Water Assessment report for the Statesville Southern
States Fertilizer Plant. The letter stated that NCDEHNR was in agreement with Law
concerning the need for further assessment activities. NCDEHNR indicated that these
activities should be designed to more fully define the vertical and horizontal extent of
nitrate/nitrite ground -water contamination. Specifically, NCDEHNR suggested six points
for consideration during Phase II assessment.
A June 15, 1990 submittal was prepared by Law to respond to the May 4, 1990 State letter.
It also contained a proposed Phase II Ground -Water Assessment work plan designed to
address the six points outlined by NCDEHNR.
Phase H Ground -Water Assessment activities were completed and a Phase II Ground -Water
Assessment Report was submitted to Southern States Cooperative on September 21, 1990.
Analytical results from Phase II analyses indicated that subsurface nitrate/nitrite
contamination had migrated along a path following surface drainage features. In addition,
the holding ponds on site appeared to have been responsible for the impact on ground -water
at the site. At the time of the Phase II report submittal, neither horizontal nor vertical
extent of contamination had been adequately defined.
1-4

After submission of the Phase II report, authorization to drill off -site to the east of the plant
was granted. Monitoring well K65W6" F" wa installed, sampled and analyzed for
nitrate/nitrate ground -water contamination. Analysis indicated a nitrate/nitrite level
significantly below the NCDEHNR threshold value. Our October 24, 1990 submittal details
this work.
On December 12, 1990, NCDEHNR issued a letter to Southern States requesting additional
(Phase III) site assessment. The letter requested that a deep well be installed (K65WTT')
and that a well survey of surrounding property be conducted. The letter stated that the
Phase III report would be due 90 days from receipt of the letter. However, the due date
was later extended to April 12, 1991 (please refer to our letter to NCDEHNR dated March
5, 1991).
This Phase III -A Assessment report describes well installation and sampling activities
conducted at the site per our Proposed Phase III Ground -Water Assessment Cost Estimate
dated December 21, 1990.
Our understanding of the plant procedures and processes is based on our discussions with
Southern States personnel and our observation of plant operations made on January 8, 1990.
We have also been furnished with general site topography plans. We have not conducted
a detailed review of plant records or process equipment specifications
1-5

2.0 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
2.1 Monitoring Well Installation
One deep ground -water well was completed at the subject site. This well was placed at the
K65W7 well cluster and designated K65WTY (see Figure 2). This well. was installed as an
open face rock well. The rock well was installed using air -rotary drilling techniques. A 10
inch roller -cone bit was advanced to the top of rock. A steel casing was placed on the top
of rock and grouted in place to seal the soil zone during air drilling. An air -hammer was
then advanced through the rock to the top of the desired interval. A four inch PVC casing
was then grouted in the borehole using a cement/bentonite grout. After waiting
approximately 72 hours to allow the grout to set properly, a 3 7/8-inch hole was drilled
through the grout seal by an air hammer to the desired depth.
Drilling cuttings and fluids were caught by digging a small unlined holding basin next to the
boring. The drilling area was sloped to route water toward the basin.
The down -hole drilling equipment was decontaminated by steam cleaning prior to drilling.
Stearn cleaning was performed to minimize the possibility of cross -contamination.
Upon completion of drilling, a lockable steel cover was placed over the well. The cover is
intended to protect the well casing and deter vandalism. The cover was grouted at the
surface.
2-1

The horizontal location of the monitoring well (K65W7"I") is within 10 feet horizontally of
existing wells K65W7X and K65W7"H". Relative elevations of the tops of well casings and
the ground surface at the boring were measured with a survey level and rod, referencing the
existing monitoring wells.
A Ground -Water Monitoring Well Installation Record and a Well Construction Record are
presented in the Appendix.
2.2 Ground -Water Sampling
Ground -water samples were obtained from monitoring wells K65W6"E" and K65W7I" on
January 29, 1991.
The monitoring wells were developed to allow the open rock formation to recover from the
effects of drilling and to bring fresh formation water into the well. The wells were
developed using air lifting techniques, removing at least six well volumes prior to sampling.
The wells were sampled using Teflon bailers and new polypropylene rope. The Teflon
bailers were cleaned in the Law Environmental laboratory with phosphate -free detergent,
dilute nitric acid, and isopropanol, with distilled water rinse after each step. The bailers
were wrapped with aluminum foil to minimize the possibility of contamination during
transportation to the site. Field measurements included water levels, pH, and specific
2-2

conductivity. Table 1 illustrates measured field parameters from the February, 1990 (Phase
I), August, 1990 (Phase II) and January, 1991 (Phase III -A) sampling events.
The recovered ground -water samples were packaged in ice and shipped for chemical analysis
via next -day delivery to Law Environmental National Laboratories in Kennesaw, Georgia.
The samples were tested for nitrate and nitrite content in general accordance with EPA
Method 353.2. Chain -of -custody documentation was used to provide a written record tracing
the possession and handling of the samples from the time of collection through laboratory
analysis and final recording of the results. Laboratory analysis and a copy of the chain -of -
custody are included in the Appendix.
Two off -site potable water wells were located south and southwest of Southern States
Fertilizer. An attempt was made to sample the wells. But, in a visit to the well locations
on December 17, 1990, both were found to have been removed from service and their
casings filled with concrete (see attached Figures for well locations).
2.3 Surface -Water Sampling
Three surface -water samples were obtained on January 29, 1990. The samples were
collected from the unnamed creek which borders the west side of the site. One surface -
water sample was collected from each of the following locations: upgradient of Ponds No.
1 and 2, due west (midstream) of Pond No. 2, and downgradient of the ponds (close to the
location where surface water flows off -site). Figure 3 illustrates the approximate locations.
2-3

Surface water samples were collected from the creek using laboratory cleaned 40 ml VOA
vials. Surface -water samples were packaged and shipped as described for ground -water
samples, Section 2.2.
M

3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The project site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province, an area underlain by
ancient igneous and metamorphic rocks. The virgin soils encountered in this area during
previous assessment activities are the residual product of in -place chemical weathering of
rock which was similar to the rock presently underlying the site. In areas not altered by
erosion or disturbed by the activities of man, the typical residual soil profile consists of silty
and/or clayey soils near the surface, where soil weathering is more advanced, underlain by
sandy silts and silty sands. The boundary between soil and rock is not sharply defined. This
transitional zone, termed "partially weathered rock", is normally found overlying the parent
bedrock. Partially weathered rock is defined, for engineering purposes, as residual material
with standard penetration resistances in excess of 100 blows per foot. Weathering is
facilitated by fractures, joints and by the presence of less resistant rock types. Consequently,
the profile of the partially weathered rock and hard rock is quite irregular and erratic, even
over short horizontal distances.
In this geologic setting it is expected that large scale fracture trends would not significantly
control the direction of ground -water movement on a local scale such as at the subject site.
However, associated small-scale fractures subparallel to the large-scale trends, if present,
could result in a preferred direction of ground -water movement in the rock beneath the
subject site.
Monitoring well K65WTI" was drilled using air -rotary techniques. No soil samples were
logged or analyzed. However, soil descriptions for adjacent, previously installed monitoring
3-1

wells are presented in our Phase H Ground Water Assessment Report dated September 21,
1990 and illustrated on Figure 4. Competent rock was encountered at approximately 132
feet.
On February 18, 1991, the ground -water level in each LEI well was measured using a
battery -operated electronic measuring device. Ground -water elevations are illustrated on
Table 3 along with sampling intervals of each well. Figure 2 illustrates the elevation of
ground water at each well and estimates ground -water contours for the area.
As shown in Figure 2, our measurements revealed that the ground -water flow direction is
generally northeast to southwest. Previous data confirms this trend, and further suggests
that a ground -water high point or "ridge" straddles the northeast corner of the site. Ground-
water northeast of the "ridge" apparently flows northeast toward Fourth Creek, while
ground -water southwest of the ridge flows southwest and south toward Third Creek.
NCDEHNR wells K65W4, K65W5, K65W6, K65W7 and K65W8 have recently been
abandoned by the NCDET--INR. Ground -water contours illustrated on Figure 2 for the
northern section of the map are based on previous water level measurements made by
NCDEHNR on September 1, 1989.
3-2

Ground -water levels may fluctuate several feet with seasonal and rainfall variations.
Normally, the highest ground -water levels occur in late winter and spring and the lowest
levels occur in late summer and fall. Accordingly, the contour lines illustrated in Figure 2
depict general flow only; localized flow may be somewhat different.
Regional ground -water flow is thought to be influenced by the general west to east surface
water flow of Third and Fourth Creeks and the south and southeast flow directions of the
unnamed creeks downgradient of the plant.
Hydraulic gradients were determined by dividing the difference in ground -water elevations
at two locations by the horizontal distance between the two locations. Because of the
extensive relief at the site, horizontal gradients were determined between wells K65W6"A"
and K65W7"A", and wells K65W7"A" and K65W7"G". These wells are screened at
approximately the same interval and they are oriented in the direction of preferential
ground -water flow. Horizontal gradients were calculated to be 0.032 ft/ft and 0.031 ft/ft,
respectfully.
Vertical hydraulic gradients were determined at well clusters K65W6 and K65W7. At each
location, the gradient was determined between the shallow and deep wells. Vertical
gradients ranged from 0.021 ft/ft downward between wells K65W6"A" and K65W6"E" to
0.050 ft/ft downward between wells K65W7"A" and K65W7"I". The 0.050 ft/ft downward
vertical gradient is likely exaggerated due to the mounding effect of the water table near
Ponds No. 1 and 2. The vertical gradient between wells K65W7"H" and K65W7I" was
approximately 0.027 ft/ft downward.
3-3

Directions of ground -water flow can be interpreted between wells by comparing the ground-
water elevation at those locations, and considering factors such as the topography, the
lithology, the elevation of recharge and discharge areas, and man-made influences. Figure
2 illustrates estimated ground -water contours.
Inflow permeability tests were performed in monitoring wells K65W6"B", K65W7"A" and
K65W7"B" to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of the soil zone at the site. Inflow
permeability procedures and calculations are included in the Appendix.
Hydraulic conductivities ranged from approximately 3 x 10-4 to 1 x 10-3 cm/sec based on
inflow permeability testing. The test results are as follows:
;:..........
th:;of:::»>::::>::::>:<::::.::.:::,,
..........
e:.o. M....:..r�.:.:.:..::...:::.__.......
dr ul �c . :::
,.,..:., ,.
Number;>>`°
screened Ir�tervaY
Exposed to
Conductivity (k,
.....:::....:::..:...::::.:.::.
feet :....; > <<::>:::»>;ScreenesI
:c: �
:. Interval'
..........
K65W6"B"
12.5 to 22.5
Sandy silt, silty sand
2.98 x 10-4
K65W7"A"
32.0 to 42.0
Silty sand, fine sand
3.04 x 10-4
K65W7"B"
15.0 to 25.0
Silty sand
1.46 x 10-3
Notes:
1. Field tests were performed on March 25, 1991.
2. Data were reduced and the hydraulic conductivities computed
using techniques described in NAV-FAC Soil Mechanics Design
Manual 7.1, May, 1982, Condition A.
3-4

In addition to hydraulic conductivity (k), the rates of ground -water movement (v) are a
function of hydraulic gradient (i) and the effective porosity (ne), as indicated in the equation
v=ki/ne. Based on the values obtained during field testing, the hydraulic conductivity of
the soil zone tested ranges from approximately 3 x 10-4 to 1 x 10-3 cm/sec. The effective
porosity of the soil encountered at the screened intervals can be expected to be
approximately 21 percent (based on Fetter, 1980 and Driscoll, 1986). Therefore, the lateral
ground -water movement in the soil zone at the site can be expected to range from
approximately 50 to 150 ft per year using an average horizonal gradient of 0.032 ft/ft. The
rate of migration of any constituents may be different (generally slower) than that of the
ground water, but is typically in the same general direction.
3-5

4.0 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES
4.1 Ground -Water Analysis
Table 1 summarizes the laboratory chemical test results. The ground -water samples were
tested for nitrate and nitrite concentrations in general accordance with EPA Method 353.2.
As previously noted, 15A NCAC 2L guidelines for drinking water quality set forth a.
standard threshold for nitrate of 10 mg/1 and for nitrite of 1 mg/l. Newly installed
monitoring well K65W7I" detected a 38 mg/1 nitrate/nitrate concentration. A
concentration of 1.7 mg/l was detected in the resampling of well K65W6" E".
Law monitoring wells previously sampled are also listed on Table 1. Our testing indicated
that the combined nitrate/nitrite concentrations ranged from a low of 0.14 mg/l at boring
K65W6"F" to a high of 280 mg/l at boring K65W7"H". The now abandoned potable water
well, (185 feet deep) located south of the site (sampled by others during the summer of
1989) also reportedly showed a nitrate/nitrite concentration (23 mg/1).
Data generated in accordance with the DEM approved work plan were collected to plot
estimated horizontal isopleths for the site. The isopleths are presented in Figure 3. The
isopleths illustrated should only be used in a general manner and actual concentrations may
be somewhat different.
4-1

4.2 Surface -Water Analysis
Our surface -water testing indicated that the combined nitrate/nitrite concentrations ranged
from a low of 3.4 mg/l at the midstream location (MS-2) to 7.6 mg/1 at the downstream
location (DS-3). The upstream sampling point US-1 revealed 3.6 mg/1 nitrate/nitrite. Table
2 summarizes surface -water chemical test results. Figure 3 illustrates the locations of
surface -water sampling points.
4?

5.0 EXPOSURE STUDY
5.1 Pathways Information
5.1.1 Existing Maps
No existing maps are known to be available that show all known withdrawal wells within the
vicinity of the subject site. USGS topographic maps (Statesville East, N.C. and Shepherds,
N.C., 1969) were used to locate structures within a 1500 ft radius of the property lines and
a one mile arc of the fertilizer plant. Figure 5 was prepared to illustrate structures within
the vicinity of the subject site. A conservative assumption is that all structures have private
water wells unless identified or reasoned that the structures are connected to municipal
sources. No municipal drinking water wells are known to exist within a one mile radius of
the site.
5.1.2 Ground -Water Usage
Information concerning well construction, water pumping rates, and depth below ground
surface of water withdrawal (screen interval) is not known for most of the surrounding off
site wells. The closest Down wells are located east and northeast of the site on Highway
70. A group of approximately five homes is located a minimum of 1600 feet west of the site,
along Highway 70. Investigation of the USGS Contour lines show the wells located along
Highway 70 to be topographically upgradient of the suspected sources of ground -water
contamination. Furthermore, the two northernmost on -site wells (K65W4 and K65W5)
indicated low nitrate/nitrite concentrations; 3.9 mg/1 and 4.8 mg/l, respectively.
5-1

Based on the topographic map of the area and site ground -water elevation measurements
obtained by DEM in September, 1989, the City of Statesville Fourth Creek Treatment Plant
(north of Highway 70) appears to be isolated from Southern States by a ground -water divide.
The McNess and Jefferson Smurfit industrial sites located just east of Southern States obtain
water from the Iredell Water Corporation. A City of Statesville water line runs along
Highway 70 and extends east of the Southern States Facility where it connects to an Iredell
Water Corporation water tower.
Based on a telephone conversation between Mr. Keith Snoddy of the Iredell Water
Corporation and our Mr. Bernard Schumak on March 20, 1991, the industrial sites along
Moorehead Road are connected to the Iredell Water Corporation line. This line also
connects to Wayside Estates and Forest Acres. The residential homes along Highway 70
are not connected to a municipal supply, but as previously stated are thought to be
topographically upgradient.
5.1.3 Surface -Water Usage
The unnamed creek along the western boundary of the Southern States facility is small with
an estimated width of approximately 4 ft and a depth of approximately 6 inches. The creek
receives flow from north of Highway 70. It flows south to southeast where it commingles
with other small tributaries before entering Third Creek. The yield of this unnamed creek
is so small and the access so difficult that surface -water withdrawals from the creek are not
likely. Section 15A NCAC 2B .0309 of the North Carolina Administrative Code designates
Third Creek as Class C waters (secondary recreation and agriculture uses requiring water
of lower quality).
5-2

5 2 Well Survey and County Well Sampling Review
5.2.1 Vehicular Reconnaissance
A vehicular reconnaissance of an area within a 1500 ft radius of the property line and within
a one mile arc of the site was performed on January 17, 18 and 22, 1991. The
reconnaissance consisted of driving along surrounding roads and comparing existing
structures with those illustrated on the previously mentioned USGS maps. Figure 5
illustrates the surrounding area of the site and includes structures observed during the
vehicular reconnaissance but not shown on the USGS maps.
In most cases, the structures illustrated on the USGS map are extant. Numerous new
structures were found to exist off Bethesda Road and Bell Farm Road. The new structures
on Bell Farm Road are mainly new single-family homes and are over 1/2 mile northeast
(and topographically upgradient) of the site. The new structures on Bethesda Road consist
of mainly trailer and modular homes located on the east side of the road. These homes are
located off of Meadows, Wayside Estates, Red Oak, and Forest Acres Lanes. The homes
located off of Meadows each have a well house. The homes off Wayside Estates, Red Oak
and Forest Acres are connected to a municipal water supply and fire hydrants were
observed. A community well house is located at the end of Red Oak Drive. The
community well has been abandoned and grouted in place, and these homes, based on the
conversation with Mr. Snoddy, have been connected to the Iredell Water Corporation
system.
5-3

Two older homes were located at the very end of the drive for Wayside Estates (referenced
A and B on Figure 5). These homes are not part of the development but access is from the
subdivision drive. These homes have private water wells. The third home, as illustrated on
Figure 5, was not located.
Bethesda Road intersects Cornflower Road. The property along Cornflower is used for
farming. No known wells are located on Cornflower within a one mile arc of the site
(Figure 5).
Along Highway 70 there are approximately 10 homes located within the 1500 ft radius of
the Southern States property line. Figure 5 illustrates their locations. Two industrial sites
are located just east of Southern States. One production well was reportedly in operation
several years ago but has since been abandoned. The industrial sites are on municipal
water. At the end of Moorehead is a large storage building and a mobile home/modular
home factory. No well houses or wells were observed. These industrial sites have been
connected to municipal sources. A second abandoned well is located approximately 1500
feet west from the end of Moorehead Road. The well has been grouted and abandoned.
There are thought to be five wells located within the 1500 ft radius of the property line and
downgradient of Ponds No. 1 and 2. Two of these wells are known to have been abandoned
(grouted). Two are located at the end of the drive for Wayside Estates (referenced A and
B on Figure 5) and the other is located near Red Oak and Bethesda Road (referenced C
on Figure 5). The owners of these wells were not contacted as part of this survey.
5-4

5.2.2 Well Construction Record Review
On February 11, 1.991 a limited well construction record review was performed by Law
Environmental at the Mooresville Regional Branch of the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR).
A limited number of well construction records (10) were found during the records search
of the areas previously described. The originals were of poor quality and are not complete.
Copies of these records are included in the Appendix. Two of these well records were for
wells installed by W. R. Grace & Company (Southern States). Most of the remaining well
records found were for wells located on Bethesda Road (County Road 2360).
A well construction record for the Pentecostal Baptist Church located approximately 3500
ft south of Hwy. 70 on Bethesda Road was located. Based on the telephone conversation
with Mr. Snoddy, the church has been connected to the Iredell Water Corporation system.
Records were not found for the two abandoned and grouted wells located just south of the
Southern States property. Records were not found for the two structures behind Wayside
Estates and shown on Figure 5 (located southwest of Ponds No. 1 and 2). These structures
have private residential wells. As previously noted, the third structure at the end of Wayside
Estates was not found.
5-5

Our record review revealed that only a limited number of well construction reports for
private residential wells are on file with the NCDEHNR. However, until recently, neither
residents nor drillers were required to notify the Ground -Water Protection Division of well
installation. Thus, the current files would not be expected to contain a complete and up-to-
date set of well records for private wells.
5.2.3 County Health Services Well Sampling Review
In a further effort to document the location of downgradient potable wells, Law
Environmental reviewed well sampling records at the Iredell County Health Department in
Statesville. During this review (conducted on April 1, 1991) we identified chemical analysis
data sheets for nine off -site potable wells and the former potable well on site. The data
sheets were dated May, 1989, and included laboratory test results for a full suite of drinking
water parameters. (Copies of these records are included in the Appendix). The data sheets
listed well owners by mailing address only; i.e. route and P.O. Box numbers. Maps
indicating the location of each sampling point were not available at the Health Dept.
However, we discussed the project with Mr. Kelly Sheeks, Director of Environmental Health
at the Iredell Co. Health Department. Mr Sheeks indicated that several of the wells were
located in the vicinity of the Southern States plant.
5-6

Tax maps for the area surrounding the plant were reviewed on April 4, 1991. Based on the
comparison of tax maps and the Well Survey Location map, the three homes (A, B, and C
on Figure 5) appear to have been part of the health department's sampling program.
Concentrations for N were significantly below the NCDEHNR threshold value for these
wells and the other off -site wells analyzed.
5-?

6.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND IIiTTERPRETATION
Table 1 summarizes the laboratory chemical test results. The ground -water and surface -
water samples were tested for nitrate/nitrite concentrations in general accordance with EPA
Method 353.2. As previously noted, 15A NCAC 2L guidelines for drinking water quality set
forth a standard threshold for nitrate of 10 mg/1 and for nitrite of 1 mg/l (11 mg/l N). Our
testing indicated combined nitrate/nitrite concentrations of 1.7 mg/l at boring K65W6"E"
and 38 mg/l at boring K65W71". Law monitoring wells previously sampled and analyzed
are also listed on Table 1. The now abandoned potable water well (185-foot depth) located
south of the site (sampled by others during the summer of 1989) also reportedly showed a
nitrate/nitrite concentration (23 mg/1). Surface -water samples varied from 3.4 m9/1 at
sampling point MS-2 (midstream) to 7.6 mg/1 at sampling point DS-3 (downstream).
Based on the water -table wells, subsurface nitrate/nitrite (N) impact is thought to have
mainly migrated along a path following the surface drainage feature between wells K65W6
and K65W7. The limits of N impact to the east of well K65W6 were determined by well
K65W6"F" which indicated a presence of 0.14 mg/1 N. Figure 3 illustrates estimated
isopleths for N.
The extent of elevated levels of N in ground -water west of the site is thought to be limited
by drainage features located to the west of the site and a presumed south and southwest
regional ground -water flow. The resampling at well K65W6'E" indicated a level of 1.7 mg/l
N at a sampling interval from approximately 123 to 133 feet. A concentration of 7.3 mg/1
N was detected from this monitoring well on August 1, 1990. Both of these values are
6-1

below the NCDEHNR threshold value of 11 mg/1 N and indicate that the elevated levels
are restricted to the shallower depths.
The newly installed monitoring well K65W7"I" was installed with an approximately 180 to
200 ft sampling interval. Laboratory analysis indicated N concentration of 38 mg/l. This
concentration is above the 11 mg/1 N threshold value established by the NCDEHNR but
is significantly lower than the 280 mg/1 N concentration detected at K65W7"H" (sampling
interval of approximately 100 to 110 ft). It is thought that the 200 ft depth is close to the
limit of the vertical extent of N impact surrounding this well group.
6-2

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This Phase III -A Assessment has contributed substantially to the documentation of
nitrate/nitrite contamination at the Southern States Fertilizer Plant. The extent of N in
ground water has been well defined. Based on the soil sampling performed during the
drilling activities (reported in our Phase II Assessment Report dated September 21, 1990)
there does not appear to be N contamination of soil.
Based on the laboratory analyses completed to date and information provided to us by
Southern States and W. R. Grace, we believe that the source of ground -water contamination
is associated with past plant activities. Specifically, the presence of holding ponds appears
to have been responsible for the impact on ground water at the site. This conclusion is
supported by the elevated N concentrations downgradient of both the former holding ponds
east and southeast of the plant and the two existing ponds southwest of the plant.
Modifications to plant processes have been implemented over the past several years, and
waste products are now believed to be contained within the manufacturing facility. This was
verified by plant observations made by LEI on January 8, 1990.
Near -surface soil samples obtained at the site contained very low N concentrations. Greater
nitrate/nitrite concentrations in ground water have been found at depth at several locations.
It therefore appears likely that the source of contamination has been adequately addressed
by recent plant modifications and significant releases are no longer occurring.
7-1

Nitrate/nitrite in the near surface soil has probably been dissipated by biological reduction,
and shallow ground -water zones have probably been flushed by rainfall percolation.
Based on site topography, the creek which borders to the west and south appears to inhibit
off -site migration of nitrate/nitrite under static conditions. Possible off -site migration
eastward has been addressed and defined by monitoring well K65W6"F" which indicated a
N level of 0.14 mg/l. The N concentrations in deep wells at K65W6"E" and K65W7I"
indicate that the vertical extent of nitrate/nitrite can be substantially delineated. Several
factors likely limit the migration of nitrate/nitrite from the site.
Based on the well survey, there appear to be few potential downgradient receptors of
ground -water nitrate/nitrite. Specifically, only three existing wells were located (southwest)
within 1500 ft of Southern States' property line and topographically downgradient of Ponds
No. 1 and 2. These three wells apparently have been sampled by the Iredell County Health
Department, as previously discussed in Section 5.2.3. Several residential wells along
Highway 70 were also sampled. Concentrations for N were significantly below the
NCDEHNR threshold value at these wells. A small creek separates the site from off -site
wells and appears to form a ground -water divide between off -site downgradient wells and
the impacted wells on site. Based on topography, regional ground -water appears to flow
toward the south and southeast.
7-2

The surface -water samples suggest that the unnamed creek is being influenced by
contaminated ground water between the midstream (MS-2) and downstream (DS-3)
sampling points. As previously indicated, the concentration of N increases from 3.4 mg/l
midstream (MS-2) to 7.6 mg/1 downstream (DS-3). This tends to support the position that
the N ground -water plume is migrating in a somewhat southerly direction as illustrated on
Figure 3. A southerly to southeasterly direction would be expected for regional ground-
water flow. The concentration in the creek also indicates that the creek is somewhat
inhibiting further migration across the creek. The concentrations of N detected for surface -
waters are below the 11 mg/1 threshold for drinking water. Concentrations of N are likely
to significantly decrease downstream due to the effects of dilution.
In our opinion, the information generated during Phases I, II, and III -A has satisfactorily
delineated the N plume and identified subsurface flow directions.
We recommend that plans for closure of Ponds No. 1 and 2 be implemented. Pond closure,
scheduled for the summer of 1991(upon acquisition of the required permits), should remove
the remaining contributor to ground -water nitrate/nitrites. Upon completion of pond
closure activities, the concentrations of N in ground water should begin to decrease as the
plume is diluted or intercepted by the bordering creek.
7-3

To verify this dilution, we recommend that the existing on -site wells be monitored on a
quarterly basis for two years. At the end of this time period, data will be available to
provide an objective indication of the effectiveness of dilution. If N levels steadily decrease,
monitoring frequency could be reduced. If a reduction fails to occur, further
assessment/remediation could be initiated.
Contaminated ground water is not known to have migrated across the creek toward the two
homes located at the end of Wayside Estates or the home near Red Oak and Bethesda
Road (reference A, B and C on Figure 5). Under static ground -water conditions, local
ground water is likely to flow from these homes toward the unnamed creek (eastward).
When the wells are active, however, they could influence ground -water flow by drawing
ground water below the creek.
It has been approximately two years. since these off -site wells were last sampled. We
therefore recommend that these three residential wells (referenced A, B and C on Figure
5) be resampled and tested for nitrate/nitrite. If nitrate/nitrite ground -water standards are
exceeded, we understand that Southern States will attempt to have the wells connected to
municipal sources.
7-4

8.0 QUALIFICATION OF REPORT
The exploratory activities and evaluation approaches used in this assessment are consistent
with those normally employed in evaluations of the type addressed in this report. The
dispersed borings represent an extremely small sampling of the total soil and ground water
volume about which information was determined. Our interpretation of prevailing or
average conditions is based on our field reconnaissance and on extrapolation of subsurface
data between the borings and also may be influenced by our experience with similar sites.
The above evaluation of this site was for the purposes noted and should not be used for any
other purpose.
s-1

TABLE 1
GROUND -WATER FIELD PARAMETERS/LABORATORY ANALYSES
SOUTHERN STATES FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEI JOB NO. 56-9606.80
Specif is
Boring
Conductance
NO2 + NO3
Number
Temperature Co
m.mhos/cm
pH
(as N) mg/1
*K65W6"A"
18.6
6.430
5.27
370
*K65W6"B"
15.7
0.330
4.31
22
*K65W6"C"
15.2
0.841
5.41
76
*K65W7"A"
16.0
1.320
5.81
53
*K65W7"B"
14.5
0.983
4.30
21
*K65W7"C"
14.9
1.878
4.49
93
K65W611D"
18.0
0.041
5.01
0.63
K65W6"E"
18.9
0.500
11.17
7.3
+K65W6"E"
14.4
0.119
7.23
1.7
**K65W6"F
19.0
0.700
6.28
0.14
K65W711D"
22.4
1.100
5.14
11
K65W7"E"
16.3
0.234
4.75
15
K65W711F"
19.6
1.777
5.73
99
K65W711G"
18.6
0.090
5.01
1.7
K65W711H"
25.2
N.M.
6.11
280
+K65W7"I"
15.1
0.965
7.04
38
* - Wells sampled on 2/13/90, others sampled on 8/1/90.
** - Well sampled on 9/18/90.
+ - Well sampled on 1/28/91.
N.M. - No Measurement, instrument not working properly.

TABLE 2
SURFACE -WATER LABORATORY ANALYSES
SOUTHERN STATES FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEI JOB NO. 56-9606.80
Sampling NO2 + NO3
Location (as N) mg/l
US-1
(upstream)
3.6
MS-2
(midstream)
3.4
DS-3
(downstream)
7.6

TABLE 3
GROUND -WATER ELEVATIONS
SOUTHERN STATES FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEI JOB NO. 56-9606.80
Elevation
Well
Ground
Top of Pipe
Water Level
Static Water
Screen
Location
Elevation
(TOP)
From the TOP
Level Elevation
Interval
K65W6A
862.23
864.52
16.25
848.27
48.0 - 58.0
K65W613
869.13
871.55
19.05
852.50
12.5 - 22.5
K65W6C
859.79
861.69
34.95
826.74
33.5 - 43.5
K65W6D
847.17
849.37
31.10
818.27
25.5 - 35.5
K65W6E
862.85
864.89
18.30
846.59
123.3 - 133.0
*K65W6F
K65W7A
831.17
833.47
23.00
810.47
32.0 - 42.0
K65W7B
819.53
821.75
15.85
805.90
15.0 - 25.0
K65W7C
807.62
809.72
14.32
795.40
12.0 - 22.0
K65W7D
798.59
800.64
7.32
793.32
13.0 - 23.0
K65W7E
821.46
823.70
25.61
798.09
25.0 - 35.0
K65W7F
793.74
796.15
6.73
789.42
17.5 - 27.5
K65W7G
793.49
795.98
6.20
789.78
5.0 - 15.0
K65W7H
831.78
833.92
29.10
804.82
100.0 - 110.0
K65W7I
833.18
835.54
32.60
802.94
180.0 - 200.0
*Surface Elevation Not Determined.
Notes:
Water Level Measurements taken on 2/18/91.
All measurements are in feet. Elevations based on reference elevation established on utility
pole along Hwy 70 East (see Figure 2).

I

bifllu'mo cime
J.
A
I ) k'
r
G)urse R 752 In—
)W
"� Cr �\r'`\ c\, J///\�— ��c;.�r� I !r 4�IA/• ` I• :� I III/- I 1 t
X
1 _1�.\ ,'/. r �� � "II �\ ../'-l` rr �/� \ O ``. . I � � II ` � � IIi 1% ` r\�„\ —.
N4
f-A Z
I �, �1/� j �i. �a. l ilT ; I�', .�l e>P> >, J,1/ �II�rs� �,; !-
17
� \ II �\� ', ,-��� I `� - ��� � )� �'.f�•��J•.. �1j e76•c )� '�--'�'<;.
IRV
'0, 'h
!Y JI ; ��_' O I'' l��-� �I' :�r'�;,I;I I. �o� �, .// :\c\�'��rr r/ ,�-`r=''—r si.J% I / �
41
C:5 -
.I. i ��� o f •'i; �. j�l � ,• � �- �_ /:� .\ a`�, S.r��ji_ � �� �, �1\''�• ,/ I � /..,�
-7 ird
• •II ••, •1r, I I� I\`t :�'� ( ii ��� l . \!� �r�J .)�.!' .N 1 `\ 1 I � (�`r \ll . r, V' :' \� '\=.�;
UO
-Hwy
70
72 7
f
�i.�'`�f �Iw�;�j �_ ' :� •I r 878
J)d W
do
I /" , - -;Zl
ul
x,
)N
v, a
0 2000
APPROX. SCALE, FT. LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE LOCATION MAP
SOUTHERN STATES FERTILIZER PLANT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
REF.: U.S.G.S. 7.5 MIN. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, STATESVILLE EAST QUADRANGLE, DATED 1%9. JOB NO. 56-9606 1 FIGURE

APPENDIX
GROUND -WATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION RECORD
WEI,L CONSTRUCrIGN RECORD
LABORATORY TEST DATA. REPORTS
COPIES OF WELL RECORDS
INFLOW PERMEABILITY TESTING

GROUND -WATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION RECORD

MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION RECORD
JOB NAME SOUTHERN STATES JOB NUMBER 56-9606
WELL NUMBER K65W7"1" CONCRETE PAD ELEVATION 833.18
LOCATION SOUTHERN STATES FERTILIZER PLANT, STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
INSTALLATION DATE 01/21/91
LOCKABLE COVER
CONCRETE PAD -
BOREHOLE
8" DIAMETER. STEEL. PIPE
CEMENT / BENTONITE
GROUT
4' DIA. SCH. 40 PVC PIPE
ROCK
OPEN FACE ROCK WELL
NOT TO SCALE
VENTED PVC CAP
STICKUP
--12.36 FEET GROUND
DEPTH OF
8" STEEL PIPE
63.0 FT. DEPTH OF
4" PVC PIPE
180.0 FT.
E
)EPTH
ELL
FT.
_ LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MONITORING WELL
INSTALLATION RECORD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD

NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CO*A"JNITY DEVEL014E71T
DfVISIDN OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEWE-N7 - GROUNDWATER SECT1oN
P.O. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH.N.C. 27611. PHONE [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No. Serial No.
Lat. Long. Pc
Minor Basin
Basin Code
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR LAW ENGINEERING
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER 332 STATE WELL CONSTRUCTIONPERMIT NUMBER: 48-023—TATM-0078
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: STATESVILLE, NC County:
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER SOUTHERN STATES COOPERATIVE, INC.
ADDRESS U.S. HIGHWAY 70 EAST
(Street cr Route No.
STATESVILLE, NC
City or Town State Zip Coce
3. DATE DRILLED 2/21/91 USE OF WELL. MONITORING
A. TOTAL DEPTH 200' CUTTINGS COLLECTED ®Yes ❑ No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? ❑ Yes ® No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 32.60 FT.. ❑ above TOP OF CASING,
M below
TOP OF CASING IS 2.36 FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): NA METHOD OF TEST
E. WATER ZONES (depth):
9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount
10. CASING:
Wall Thickness
Depth
Diameter or Weignl/r"i. Material
From 0 To 63' Ft.
8" STEEL
From 0
To 180
Ft.
4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC
From
To
Ft.
11. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
From 0
To 180
Ft.
BENTONITE/GROUT PRESSURE
From
To
Ft.
12.OPEN FACE:
Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
From 1 R(1 To 200 Ft. 4 in. NA in. NA
From To Ft. in. in.
From To Ft. in. in.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depin
From
To
DRILLING LOG
Formation DescriDtion
NOT CLASSIFIED:
AIR DRILLED
It additional space is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads,
or other map reference points)
"•f rr
'HWY. 70
+tin ,•\- 'e.. 1�� t - i
�� i� ��• Ii ��r711
SITE
Depth Size Material
From To Ft.
From To Ft.
Zoo
IA. REMARKS:
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDAINCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION'
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HA BEEN PROVIDED TO TH- WELL OWNER.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
Submit orioinal to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.

LABORATORY TEST DATA REPORTS

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
112 TOWN PARK DRIVE
KENNESAW, GEORGIA 30144-5599
404-421-3400
January 31, 1991
Law Environmental,Inc
431 Minuet Lane
Charlotte, NC 28217
Attention: Tom Beggs
LE Job Number: 56-9606
Subject: Chemical analysis of samples received on 01/30/91.
Dear Mr. Beggs:
Law Environmental National Laboratories has completed its analysis
of your samples and reports the results on the following pages.
These results relate only to the contents of the samples as
submitted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full
without the approval of Law Environmental National Laboratories.
If there are any. questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL TL LABS
Clifford H. McBride
QC/Coordinator
Attachment: Data Report
Invoice

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/31/91
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number 91-7840-02
Project No. 56-9606.80 Cust. No.
Project Name SOUTHERN STATES
Manager: TOM BEGGS
Sample Information
Station ID
: K65W7 "I"
Sampled Date/Time
: 01/29/91. 15:00
Matrix
: W
Received Date/Time
: 01/30/91 10:00
Type
: GRAB
Received From/By
: JM/KP
Collector
: JM
Chain of Custody
: 2599
Number of Containers
: 1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Nitrogen, Nitrate EPA 353.2 mg/l 0.05 `, 38 �) 01/30/91 JAL
Nitrogen, Nitrite EPA 353.2 mg/1 0.05 "ND— 01/30/91 JAL
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/31/91
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number : 91-7840-01
Project No. . 56-9606.80 Cust. No. .
Project Name : SOUTHERN STATES
Manager: TOM BEGGS
Sample Information
Station ID :
K65W6 "E"
Sampled Date/Time
01/29/91 15:15
Matrix :
W
Received Date/Time
: 01/30/91 10:00
Type :
GRAB
Received From/By
: JM/KP
Collector :
JM
Chain of Custody
: 2599
Number of Containers
: 1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Nitrogen, Nitrate EPA 353.2 mg/l 0.05
Nitrogen, Nitrite EPA 353.2 mg/l 0.05
1.7 01/30/91 JAL
ND 01/30/91 JAL
Signed ` fie.

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/31/91
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number : 91-7840-03
Project No. : 56-9606.80 Cust. No.
Project Name : SOUTHERN STATES
Manager: TOM BEGGS
--- Sample Information ---
Station ID
: US-1
Sampled Date/Time
: 01/29/91 14:30
Matrix
: W
Received Date/Time
: 01/30/91 10:00
Type
: GRAB
Received From/By
: JM/KP
Collector
: JM
Chain of Custody
2599
Number of Containers
1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Nitrogen, Nitrate EPA 353.2 mg/l 0.05 3.5 01/30/91 JAL
Nitrogen, Nitrite EPA 353.2 mg/l 0.05 ND 01/30/91 JAL
Signed t�

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/31/91
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number : 91-7840-04
Project No. . 56-9606.80 Cust. No. .
Project Name : SOUTHERN STATES
Manager: TOM BEGGS
--- Sample Information ---
Station ID
: MS-2
Sampled Date/Time
01/29/91 14:00
Matrix
: W
Received Date/Time
01/30/91 10:00
Type
: GRAB
Received From/By
JM/KP
Collector
: JM
Chain of Custody
2599
Number of Containers
1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Nitrogen, Nitrate EPA 353.2 mg/l 0.05 3.4 01/30/91 JAL
Nitrogen, Nitrite EPA 353.2 mg/1 0.05 ND 01/30/91 JAL
Signed �' " "► el�

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/31/91
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number : 91-7840-05
Project No. : 56-9606.80 Cust. No.
Project Name : SOUTHERN STATES
Manager: TOM BEGGS
Sample Information
Station ID
: DS-3
Sampled Date/Time
01/29/91 13:30
Matrix :
W
Received Date/Time
01/30/91 10:00
Type :
GRAB
Received From/By.:
JM/KP
Collector :
JM
Chain of Custody :
2599
Number of Containers :
1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter...............................Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Nitrogen, Nitrate EPA 353.2 mg/1 0.05
Nitrogen, Nitrite EPA 353.2 mg/1 0.05
7.6 01/30/91 JAL
ND 01/30/91 JAL
Signed//�

l NVII........ FNT-. .._C (�N Cl 01 E( `
fI
® NATIONALLABORATORIESSAMPLING
NAME OF FACILITY: �uT her,)
zw
r
INFORMATION D
STREET ADDRESS: f
®_ iclf
G. 7�� �/U >��_
� CITY/STATE: rE7' C.S UI�Je. A�, , Zlr:
At I � r
PROJECT NAME
JOB NO.
N
A- e s
s�- J 10 8 o
z
—
Q
Q a`
i
SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE)
J
Z
V'MPLING
Fa-
O O
A,Q�t�
� OrG\ O\ Z\ O a x P5 `e`a�
G ��\�
I— —
Q��
DATE
IL
O
JOP 01 c LAP �41 aQJz V-F
�G Q e �o Q, F Q V
V'e\\\?
Q
TIME
SAMPLE STATION DESCRIPTION
ZV\�V
\�, \ �ho�
O
LENL LAB NO.
15 1
✓
1�6 5 W E"
1 Soa
vd
w
K Z,5 VJ 7 "L
14 30
1 wl
U -
9'e/o c.
I
w
MS -
7k�u -��� •
1336
—3
I SHED 113Y:
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY:
RELINQUISHED BY:
RECEIVED BYI
DATE/TIME
;ZNQU
(SIGNATURE)
_
(SIGNATURE)
(SIGNATURE)
(SIGNATURE)
RELINQUISHED BY:
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY:
RELINQUISHED BY:
RE iVED``AT LABORATORY:
D TE/TIME
(SIGNATURE)
(SIGNATURE)
(SIGNATURE)
(SI NATURE)
DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL AND YELLOW COPIES ACCOMPANY SAtIPLE SHIPIAENT TO LABORATORY.
PINK COPY RETAINED BY SAMPLERS YELLOW COPY RETAINED BY LABORATORY.
REMARKS:
RECOVERY WELL-RW
• SOURCK RCRA MONITORING WELL - MW
CODES: SOIL/SEDIMENT -SO
SLUDGE - SL
NPDES DISCHARGE ND
DRINKING WATER DIN
HAZARDOUS WASTE - HW
SURFACE WATER -SW

HEALTH DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS RE, CORDS

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUP,CES 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT p _
WELL RECORD DIV!SION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
P. O. Box 27657 — RALEIGH, N.C. 27t 11 919-733-2020
DRILLING COLTRACTOR� 7. D i 1 to 0 KEG. No. WELL CONSTRUCTION PER►SIT N0.
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: S+ateS'.''.2.1'.'. County: Icede ?//
Quadrangle No. KO 5 w Z
(Road,Community or Sumdivision and Lot No.)
OWNER: ^= DRILLING LOG
3. ADDRESS. DEPTH
FROM TO FORMATION DESCRIPTION
4. TOPOGRIJ.L'HY: draw, valley,slcDe,hilltop, f-L. :(circle one)
5. USE OF WELL: DATE.- ! 50 rt
r ,
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE 1-: EXISTING 4,iLL? jy `' � � O Ci
7. TOTAL DEPTH: RIG TYPE OR. METHOD: air
6. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES NO
9. CASING: Depth Inside Wall thick. type
Dia. or weight/ft.
From. (} to ft 7 5 a 5 f z p
Yo`
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From 0 to20 ft ' Y OLl t P0Ured
additional space as needed, use back ot torm
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type & Opening
From to ft LOCATION SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roads, or other map reference points)
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
F'rOR: to ft f f
_
i 1 / r7
1S. WATER ZONES (de_ "l`
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft.anovetop of casing
below
Casing is_ft.
above land surface ELEV: ��Csy�%ife/f
15. YIELD (gpm) : l (1 METHOD TESTING: P 1 r -70
16. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft.
%BML
after hours at opr.,.
17. CHLORINATION: Type 7m;-; Amount ® /
IS. WATER QUALITY: TEMPERATURE(OF)
19. PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed
I
Type Capacity (gpm)HP
Make Intake Depth I
Airline Depth
20. HAS THE OWNER BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS? 'J n C
21. REMARKS
I do hereby certify that this well was constructed in accordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and Standards and that this well record is true and exact.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR Or AGENT JK t

NORTH CAROLINA. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOpMEN7
MANAGEMENT T
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL , GROUNDWATER SECTION
WELL RECORD �
P.O. BOY. 276E7 - RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
DRILLING CONTRACTOR nr- (''n REG. NO.2;i y WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT i'O.
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: Statesville, N.C. County: I red ell
Hwv --#%0 E Quadrangle No.
(Road, Community or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER: I. C r a.^ E & C, o )RILLING LOG
3 . ADDRESS: P U . C } 11 F' ? ; U t ut E S . DEPTI:
FROM; TO FORMT.TIOI: DESCRIP _O::
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw,valley, slope, hilltop, flat (circle ore)
5. USE 01 WELL: Domestic DATE: )-11.-"1. �1
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? 0 I �J1 � 2 r,, RL Oak
7. TOTAL DEPTH: 24C' RIG TYPE OR METHOD: al r
6. FOR1,1ATION SAMPLES COLLECT---'F.,: YES NO
9. CASING: Depth inside Wail thick. type
Dia. or weight/ft.
From 0 to 191ft 6 —
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
FromO to 20 ft Grout Poured
Ii additional space is nee ee, use bacT, of corm
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type & Opening
From to ft LOCATION SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roads, or other map reference points).---��
r
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size
From to ft
13. WATER ZONES(de pt::)
Material
14. STnTIC WATER LEVEL: ft.� o�eto of casing ��1`%
below F' J 't
Casing is ft. above land surface ELEV: !G
15. YIELD (gpm) : 20 METHOD OF TESTING: (,j 1^
16. PUMPING WATER. LEVEL: ft.
after hours at 9p1--1.
17. CHLORINATION: Type 1-T]-1 Amount
18. WATER QUALITY: TEI4PERATURE(cF)
19. PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed
Type Capacity (gpm)HP
Make Intake Depth
Airline Depth
20. HAS THE OWNER SEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS? yes
21. REMARKS
= ✓ �: G �� .
v X
I do hereby certify that this well was constructed in accordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and Standards and that this well record is true and exact.
SIGNATURE OF CONTP,�,C.'OR OF A.GEN'I' DATE

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES -
WELL RECORD GROUND WATER DIVISION�T�'
P. 0. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH, N. C. 27611
DRILLING CONTRACTOR ZT REG. NO. `L� �_ WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO.
I. WELL LOCATION: (StG6 a sketch of the location on bock of form)
Nearest Town: 4), 4 r s r t o a•,^ G s, r'e '` County: 1, - e
S2 � 3 o Quadrangle No.
2. OWNER:
3. ADDRESS: ~-�.j i• a I
4. TOPOGRAPHY: drawl, valley, slope, hilltop, flat
5. USE OF WELL, (k, �% DATE:
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELLS
7. TOTAL DEPTH: RIG TYPE OR METHOD:
8. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: =YES No. of Bags
9. CASING: Inside Wall thick.
or
Depth Diom. weight /ft. Type
From to ft.
10. GROUT:
Depth Material Method
From
to ft
II. SCREEN:
Depth Diom. Type and Opening
From
to f 1.
12. GRAVEL:
Depth Size Material
From
to ft.
13. WATER ZONES(depth):
14.
STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft.
above top of cosing.
below
Casing is ft. above land
surface. ELEV.
DATE MEASURED:
15.
YIELD(gpm): METHOD OF TESTING:
16.
PUMPING WATER LEVEL:
ft. after hours
at g pm.
17.
CHLORINATION: Type
Amount
18.
WATER QUALITY:
TEMPERATURE(°F)
19.
PERMANENT PUMP:(Show a sketch of
well head on back of form)
Date installed Type
Make
Capacity
(gpm) HP
Intake Depth
Airline Depth
20.
HAVE YOU INFORMED THE WELL
OWNER OF THE
DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS?
21.
REMARKS:
I do hereby certify that this well record is true and exact.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
Form GW-I White Copy -Office of Water and Air Resources; Blue- Drillers Copy; Grr:,n-Owners Copy

WELL HEAD COMPLETION: Draw a sketch of the well head showing casing, pump piping,
seals, vents, access port, grout, and enclosure.
WELL LOCATION: Draw a location sketch showing the direction and distance of the
well to at least two (2) nearby reference points such as roads,
intersections and streams. Identify roads with State Highway road
identification numbers.
IJ
wenr
bra.

GPOMNID VIATE-R U-,;VISICN
1
2 7 6 8 _7 - R A L E 1G, f -1
P. C. G! N. C. 21611
REG. itin. WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMY7
ct ne lo
oo bcc% Of fo;
cou-M-0:
------- Ou ongIR ti(j.
no" 7�
-2BUILL-ING, LOG
4•
vc
r
..... .... ....
G.
Dr,,,s v"E'LL RE.PLACE
!:,iJ EXP�Tlf,`,' 'w,ELL
7.
TClTAL H:
Wi- TYPE OF'.
L
or
............
GROL,'
U:oth
t 2 r i I h cj!.i
f I
Diom. Tv !L.rjnd QRtnjao
I
From
F1
rj
Size
ILE P. —
Mal er iol
14.
S I AT IG --'ATER LE-VEL f t. 0bow-tap of crisin4.
below
C!bcjve 1,nd ELEV-
DATE
16-
P i P�Y I N— !X,- ER L E VE L: o,,;e,----------hours
17.
c i:-:` F-.,:; :-7, i
13.
Ir—.:Z MA T, P UM S ha f e i 1 ht.id'il 9 b a a f f
ul
copucit, V
N
— - ----- Ah, i:F-, a 11, c P!h
HAWEit
-0 7,'iC: ".El OF THE E
S R !11 r
II
21.
RT-1.1finlKs,
rsrl:!y to.ut record iS TIUP Cndl t3Xa--j.
Fornn --';I
n
—111M ---
it
-Lt
it
T-
-
----------------------
$ou I., C! 11 e f r c c C. pj ; -�-, - e �! 11. - (, ; i �v
I �"fs CC,

WL'LI, I-IEAD MND?LE'TiOST: Dr'sketch
1W a of til0 6T0l] head ShOwlno C3^inro;� PLIMD piping,
seals, vents, access por t5 Jc1Z 011t, and enclostt? e,
location ian sa-e Bch snoT.rir. tl,e direction and d i �r „� � a�' t;~le
well to at least - ,�,•��_:.�
two (�) rc�Qr Jr reference points such as roads,
inters,,Dctions and streams. Identify roads with State Fli�haa: y read
ieent i i'icat ion ni-naY;ers.
I

NUN I H CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURQF;_
OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES %0
WELL RECORD GROUND WATER�0 DIVISION
P. 0. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH, N. C. 27611 -
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Air Drilling CO REG. NO 244
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO
I- WELL LOCATION. (Shoe p ke(ch of tht -ti-n pbgr} of form)
Nearest Town: +�-LESVl�1S 1`,' Ci County: IredeJ.l
!-1^ Side Rd a
o ocynun�l pr Subdivision and Lot No. Quadrangle No.
2. OWNER: ROber� �. riOS�[1
3. ADDRESS: Rt . ! , S to t eS Vme, N.C. DRI LING LOG
4. TOPOGRAPHY: dram., valley, slope, hilltop, flat
5. USE OF WELL: DomeStiC DATE: 2-18-75
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? n0
7. TOTAL DEPTH: _1L5f RIG TYPE OR METHOD:_ al r
B• FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: =YES No. of Bogs_
9. CASING: Inside Wall thick.
or
Death kpm, weight/ft. T e
From 0 to 10 9 ft. b� G V,
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From 0 to 20 ft Grout Poured
11. SCREEN: Depth Diom. Type and Opening
From to— ft.
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From to ft.
13. WATER ZONES(depth): 1621
ROM
TO
O
1091
1091
1651
Dirt
Rock
14.
STATIC WATER LEVEL:
ft above lop of casing.
Casing is fl.
below
above land surface. ELEV.
DATE MEASURED:
15..
YIELD(gpm): 20
METHOD OF TESTING: air
16.
PUMPING WATER LEVEL:
fl. after hours
at
gpm.
17.
CHLORINATION: Type
T'-r'iL 'Tab _ Amount
IS.
WATER QUALITY:
TEMPERATURE(`F)
19.
PERMANENT PUMP:(Show
o sketch of well head on back of form)
Date installed
Type Make
Capacity
(gpm) HP
Intake Depth
Airline Depth
20. HAVE YOU INFORMED THE WELL OWNER OF THE
DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS? e S
21. REMARKS.
1 do hereby certify that this well r ord is true and ex o 1. II I I ^1* ' ir�^rr
'tn
p�J i•„i-EI`� DIVISION
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE RALEIGH, N.
Farm cw I white COPY- Office of Water and Air Resources; Blue -Drillers Copy; Green -Owners Copy

r 1 head showing casing, I
WELL HEAD COMPLETION: Draw a sketch of the well g �, pip pipi�,
seals, vents, access port, grout, and enclosure.
WELL LOCATION: Draw a location sketch showing the direction and distance of the
well to 'at least two (2) nearby reference points such as roads,
intersections and streams. Identify roads with State Highway rc- d
identification numbers.
Zk

NORTH Ch ROLiNF, DEPAR7MENT OF, T:v. 'v=..L RES URCtS b CUYi'UNl + t !)tVt LUt1Mt.:I
WELL RECORD DIVISION vF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27637 - zALEIGH, N.C. 27611
eD ,
DRILLING CONTRACTOR -i i' .). P.EG. NO. WELL CONSTRUCTION PER11T NO.
1.
WELL LOCATION. (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town:
Count, T
7n
Quadrangle No.
(Road,Community or Subdivision and Lot No.)
03-0 7 D
2.
I.
OWNER:='"i-an T_•c, - 0 DRILLZ:JG LOG
3 .
.. _ -1 t r; _ t•T • � l
ADDRESS: �<. �' ��' j � .J U ' :: C i
+7:... H
DEPTH
_ t y
FRO`; TO FORMATION DESCRIPTION
4.
TOPOGRAPHY: draw,valley,slope,hilltop,flat(circle one)
5.
USE OF WELL: DATE : � - �- j -
� r (D� -
6.
DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL?
7.
TOTAL DEPTH: I RIG TYPE OR �ISETHOD:
, y
6.
FOP-NIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: .ES N0
' Z
9.
CASING: Depth Inside wall thick. type
Z07/
Dia. or weight/ft.
From !) to ft '
%qr .7 i"i(V.
10.
GROUT: Depth Material Method
From '^ toy ft J, ?ou,r
If additional space is neeaea, use bacT oT ..orm
11.
SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type & Opening
_
From to ft
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show
distarce.to numbered roads, or other map reference points)
12.
GR=,VEL: Depth Size Material
-.�
From to ft
•t+ � ' '
13.
WATER 70-ES Ideptnf
14.
above
STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft.below ton of casing
Casing is ft. above lard surface ELEV:
15.
YIELD(gpm): 1-% METHOD OF TESTING:_ -
16.
PUMPING WATER LEVEL:ft.
after hours at
17.
CHLORINATION: Type Amount
18.
WATER QUALITY: TE:I•IPERATURE (oF)
19.
PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed
Type Capacity (cpm)HP
Make Intake Death
Airline Depth
20.
HAS THE OWNER BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF THIS RECORD AIQD
INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS? Y �, S
21.
REMARKS l ✓/•,•✓ . �: /,C/).'l f/ j! C
I do hereby certify that this well was constructed in
accordance with N.C. Well Construction -
_
Regulations and Standards and that this ;cell record is
and
true and exact.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OF AGENT DATE

N. C. DEPT. or. NATURATo
RESOURCES AND
CO'L'v.UN1T_ 7'RVZ1—'r_)P1%1ENT
APR 1 5 1991
DIVISIOU OF Ef1VIR011I0TH MHAGEMEg
MOORESVILLE RECIOUAL OFFICE
April 12, 1991
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115-0950
Attention: Ms. Barbara Christian
Subject: Phase III -A Ground -Water Assessment
Southern States Fertilizer Plant
Statesville, North Carolina
LEI Job No. 56-9606
Gentlemen:
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
431 MINUET LANE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28217
P.O. BOX 240674
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28224-0674
704-527-6717
Based on our April 10, 1991 telephone conversation, we understand that Southern States
Fertilizer has been granted a one -week extension (until April 19, 1991) for submittal of its
Phase III -A Ground -Water Assessment. The report is currently being finalized and should
be complete in several days.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVTR0NMENTAL. INC.
Bernard B. Schumak
Project Hydrogeologist
BBS:tkj
cc: Mr. Hilton Withers
Southern States Fertilizer
Mr. David Tucker
W. R. Grace & Co.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN
WELL RECOr,D DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTS
r P O.,Box 277 - RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 919-733-2020
T
U
LING CONTRACTOR � /j ,%H � 2 i REG. NO �- �' ') WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO
1. WELL LOCATION: (S ow sketch of t4e/ Io�catio�nbelo_w)
f /
yy
Nearest Town: C/U/i / /
County: d ✓Ll2���'�/I/
///
5-X
Quadrangle No.
j (D
(Road, Community or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER: �G - �� - le / r
DRILLING LOG
�1
3. A.D.7RESS:! /'. DEPTH
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw,valley slop ei hilltop,flat(circle one)
FROM TO
FORMATION'DESCRIPTION
Gj� 7
5. USE OF WELL: :L-P 1% DATE:
-
WEL
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING t
7. TOTAL DEPTH: .5 y RIG TYPE OR METHOD:
8. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES NO
9. CASING: Depth Inside Wall thick. type
Dia. or weight/ft.
�41 y
From4__ - — LPiI-C
r�
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method t
From �to-LL) ft_LJ!?��
11. SCREEN. Depth
From to ft
Dia. Type & Opening
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From I to!-Z-ft ?&h;�il
13. WATER ZONES (depth)
v
If additional space is needed., use back ot torm
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roads, or other map reference points)
14.
STATIC WATER LEVEL•. L ft.above top of casing
below p g
R
yj�
J •1
Casing is��t. above land surface ELEV:
15.
YIELD(gpm):_ METHOD OF TESTING: �
-j
`
I
� (�
16.
PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ft.
after hours atgpm-1
17.
CHLORINATION: Type Amount
18.
WATER QUALITY: TEMPERATURE(OF)
Installed � /�� �
i
� %
19.
PERMANENT PUMP: Date
Type Capacity- (gpm)HPP
i
Mak A i Intake Depth .
Airla. Deptl
�.
20. HAS THE OWNER BEEN PROVIDED OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS?
21. REMARKS —
I do hereby certify that this well was constructed in accordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and Standardsnd the pis 1 record is true,and exact.
S G,NAT OP CONTRACTO P A ENT DATE

.i v, - 3 ;. '2;,-14,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WELL RECORD DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 11
P. Box.37687 RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 919-733-2020
DRILLING CONTRACTOR REG. NO. S ONSTRU WELL CCTION PERMIT NO. L/ /
C— r.�
1. WELL LOCATION: IShow sketch of the �location below) �
Nearest Town: .f_ i �'; ✓' County:
14
Quadrangle No. T1v�L5 X
(Road,Community or Subdivision: and Lot No.)
2. OWNER: — L% — ,l l- �V✓✓r DRILLING LOG
3. ADDRESS: ./f= /Ja24 % it Gc• i` 7 (_-/ DEPTH
FROM TO FORMATION DESCRIPTION
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw,valley,slope,hilltop at(circle one)
+.
5. USE OF WELL: DATE: ,�!/✓ i— I
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? r�''� •— % j �ii%/� z-L,rtij!�
/7. TOTAL DEPTH: RIG TYPE OR METHOD:
2 /
S. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES NG
r
9. CASING: Depth Inside Wall thick. type IJ
Dia. or weight/ft.
r,
From % to F /! ft %i C u
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From to 2: G f t 7,
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type & Opening
From to ft
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material /f
From Z 0' toZ-Ll ft
13. WATER ZONES (depth) /✓, J !� A ,'_� y
o-` d
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft.aboveto of casin
below p g
Casing is / ')� ft. above land surface ELEV:
15. YIELD (gpm):_� METHOD OF TESTING:
16. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: j £t. r
after hours at j gpm.
17. CHLORINATION: Type Amount
18. WATER QUALITY: / TEDfPERATURE(oF)
19. PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed — % G
Type Capacity > r> (gpm)HP!V
Make � Intake Depth_,��,
Air ne Dept
If additional space is needed, use ac o orm
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roade, or other map reference points)
s
)
r
yr} G �
( .V �z 13
n
t
20. HAS THE OWNER BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS? /ice
21. REMARKS
I do hereby certify that this well was constructed in accordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and Standards, and that this well record is true and exact.
SSI(YINAlUR: OFCONTR—CTOP. AGENT DA.TE

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WELL RECOP,D DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT , -V- ?zr+ ?
�O
4 . Box 276/ai - RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 919-733-2020 7 `J
DRILLING CONTRACTOR ter!` r �i mil ,('�i j REG. NO. WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. � C V
1. WELL LOCATION: (& ow sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: C � L � County: � G
Quadrangle No. n J y
(Road,Community or Subdivision, and Lot No.)
2. OWNER: -/ C Lr-t--L DRILLING LOG
3. ADDRESS: rf 'i n rY l 0 j DEPTH
�-� FROM TO FORMATION DESCRIPTION
4. TOPOGRAPHY: dr/aJw,valley,slope,hilltop f! la',)(circle one)
5. USE OF WELL:
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL? � tin— ✓
7. TOTAL DEPTH: / .5W* RIG TYPE OR METHOD: ,6,rf�/
B. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES 140
9. CASING: Depth Inside Wali thick. type
Dia. or weight/ft.
From-�to�ft _/, (�+�'�'ti1 r
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
I
From to 2 G� ft Li9wGcC (� �`C�c�t I%'`
If as i ic, nal space is needed, use back of norm
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type s Opening
From to ft LOCATION SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roads, or other map reference points)
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
J , I/
From % ,.t j ft /,J[�f/�t .�ZC �- /?� tl026
.__��ti /
13. WATER ZONES (depth)
above
14. STATIC WATER
'LEEVEL: )7? ft'belowtop of casing
Casing is I�/" ft. above land surface ELEV: }
15. YIELD(gpm): J _METHOD OF TESTING:_ I I
i
16. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: ) -% ft.
after I hoursat gpm.)
17. CHLORINATION: Ty{pJe L� Amount
18. WATER QUALITY: / TEMPERATURE(OF)
G....
19. PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed 41i� _..
Type Capacity _(gpm) HP
Make Intake Depth__` (
r; L' i'.
Airl 6e Dept
20. HAS THE OWNER BEEN PROVIDEP A COPY OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS?
21. REMARKS
I do hereby certify that this weli was constructed in accordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and Standard an ^ that this�ell record is true,and exact.
yJ
rSI N COI. R,CTO OUI AGENT i

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N-
WELL RECORD DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
P. Q Box 2/7687 - RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 919.733-2020
�.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR ✓ % � KEG. NO. 10 t WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO.
1. WELL LOCATION: Y(ho /w. s�ke�ch of /ttlaeelocation
�below)
Nearest Town: /�"�.✓ ta:��jV�✓�/ID. �(�! County: i%
Quadrangle No. K:-,- X
(Road,Community or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER:
3. ADDRESS: /� � - ;3 DEPTH
FROM TO
4. TOPOGRAPHY: draw,valley<lope hilltop, flat (circle one)
j
5. USE OF WELL: /1 (� 7�ti11. DATE: f" / Y'( 3
6. DOES THIS WELL REPLACE AN EXISTING WELL
i
7. TOTAL DEPTH: �iS ,aRIG TYPE OR METHOD:
8. FORMATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: YES NO
9. CASING: Depth Inside Wall thick. type
Dia. or weight/ft.
From—Lto�ft�e
10. GROUT: Depth Material Method
From_Ltoft 1c1i
11. SCREEN: Depth Dia. Type 6 Opening
From to ft
12. GRAVEL: Depth Size Material
From J toLLft
13. WATER ZONES (depth) :-.1 n — �N J.1�/
above
14. STATIC WATER LEVEL: ft.below
of casing
Casing is�ft. above land surface ELEV:
r
15. YIELD(gpm).- METHOD OF TESTING
16. PUMPING WATER LEVEL: 1'r ft.
after ours at-"7 gpm.
17. CHLORINATION: Type v a Amount_
18. WATER QUALITY: TEMPERATURE(oFG)
19. PERMANENT PUMP: Date Installed - 7 Cl
Type Capacity(gpm)HP.30-1
Make Intake Depth
Airl a Dep
20. HAS THE OWNER BEEN
RECOMMENDATIONS?
21. REMARKS
DRILLING LOG
FORMATION'DESCRIPTION
If additional space is needed, use back of lorm
LOCATIONi SKETCH
(Show distance to numbered roads, or other map raferance points)
I�
r I
B.".SIN CODES D.? O
HEADEF. ENT.
--
mot>-I. E i ! T. ,... e... .
-- ,
OF THIS RECORD AND INFORMED OF THE DEPARTMENTS REQUIREMENTS AND
I do hereby certify that this well was co structed in accordance with N.C. Well Construction
Regulations and StandardV h is 1 r;cd is true anfl exact.
� -3
SIQNATURE OF CONTRA TORAGENT-- IVATE
r

STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH .�.
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES .5/7i0
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN R SDL RCES____ !! /
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGT ST., RA(_EIG 27611-4
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYS — fiER SYSTE
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
o
ame of
ystem: /IrJT�i/,: �Zi:l �%•�/1�-�
�' /` `-G /J/ //• Z I P
ounty:
Report To:
ddress:
5
ZIP
2 C 1
%
elephone Number: l ` G
ollected By
Date Collected: Time:
ocation of Sampling Point:
6r 14,
,_kddress where sample was collected)
..0
Type of System:
( ) Community
( ) Non -Community
Sour Water:
( ) Ground (? ) Both
( ) Surface �'�( ) Purchased
Source o ample:
( Distribution Tap
( ) House Tap
( ) Well Tap
Type of Sample:
( ''� Raw ( ) Treated
Ty pe3f_Tjeatment:
( None
( ) Chlorinated
`) Fluoridated
( ') Filtered
Alum `
( ) Lime
( ) Soda Ash
( ) Polyphosphate
( ) ` Water Softener
( ) Other
Type of Sample:
( ) Regular ( ) Private
( ) Check (�� Special
WATER SYSTEM I.D. NUMBER (COPY FROM MAILING LABEL)
tate Drinking Water Parameters (Required)
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
Results O
irsenic
mg/I
2
arium
-C O. / mg/I
2
Cadmium
o, oo Y mg/1
3
/j" o
^hromium
<O.o mg/I
2
luoride
mg/I
2
n :5 7' , y S
0,,07
,ead
< 0.03 mg/I
2
Mercury
0 QD a- mg/I
4
litrate (as M
mg/I
2
i u ..tL�O
elenium
` p, oO.s mg/I
3
Silver
G p, v J mg I
2
H
units
1 1
,on
mg/I
2
> ti • `-n
Manganese
o ® O .3 mg/I
2
"�, "oy ��?o •�.
late Received
late Analyzed
oH5 Form 2887 7/79
Lb
ll •�. �`�° rL
Date Reported Reported By
I
Laboratory Number ir � 89
...i.. _...i n v...ti......"

STATE'�BORATORYj?f PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH -SERVICES "
C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN-�RESOORCES_"
s ;.P:O. BOX 28047 — 306 N. WILMINGT016`ST:, RALEIGH 27611
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEN(�
�.
Complete All Items Above Heavy Lin'eK
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
Name of
System
Sourc of Water:
..
.Surde (
BothAddress
) Purchased
ZIP
- .
County(/)
Source of Sample:
House Tap -_
:.�;,
!
(Well Tap ;
Type Sample: _ �'
Report To:. �. P e t S
,'
d�
Address: / Pp I7`�
(/l% Raw
=
) Treated
Type of -Treatment:
' ( None (
} Lime
Chlorinated
Soda Ash
zip ( ) Fluoridated a.;` (
) Polyphosphate
Filtered
P��' {
1 Water Softener
Collected B �`•N
y.:', (" J,- Alum, .. (
) Other
Date Collected: /� Tim ` k Y� Type of Analysis Desired: _
( ) Regular Parameters { /jam Both
��G
Location of Sampling Point: { ) Optional Parameters
Remarks: � �1�• _/
G v
Regular Parameters '
1 Results
y:+ ;Optional Parameters (List as needed)
;
4. Results
pH
• units
Arsenic
D. �� mg/I
Lead -
< <7.0 3 mg/I
CS
O
Iron Y.
O< O -mg/I."
/. /
Manganese
p. p mg/I
(J G+
Copper
•C Oo O mg/I
,
Zinc
Oe O:. mg/I
Calcium
ZFmg/I-
0
Magnesium c'
�•.a'-""'i. mg/I
GE.✓J ilk•
�� _
,Hardness-CaCO3 (C"4)i:
mg/1
Y}'�.64^�if�+V
D,U�U'p-
Alkalinity-CaCO3
o�a mg/l
Chloride
T` mg/I
Color
units
Turbidity "
NTU units
Fluoride
�, v mg/1
? .
Date Received
Date Analyzed
Date Reported �f��/�% Reported By
_ Laboratory Number
I0198 MAY -I I g9
DHS Form - 1441 Rev. 10/79 Milrirr•ri A Y.nrhaiinl,

STATE ORATCFRY- Q$ PUBLIC H ALTH
DIVISION _0E-kA_'.LTH'SERVICES
%ES.7'
- Ni' C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES e,
'0.0�130.X28047 306N. WILMINGTON RALEIGH 27611'
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
Name of
System
Address 7L r ,x 3-21
ZIP
County _T(*PUP
Report To:
Add resi: r/0. f f "o (0 /-S
741 ZIP
Collected By:
AM
Date Collected: Time:*
Location of Sampling Point: ('010 /Z _/0'
te -7
Remarks:
. /)�� ��i1 L��,.�U1�/ /� rs.
Sour of Water-
Grounbl:.
Both
Surface
Purchased
Source of Sample:
House Tap
Well Tap
Ty f Sample:
( L� r Raw
Treated
...Type-bf Treatment:
None
Lime
Chlorinated
7Soda Ash
Fluoridated
Polyphosphate
Filtered
Water Softener
Alum
Other
Type of Analysis Desired:
Regular Parameters
Both
Optional Parameters
&
Regular Parameters
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
Results
7
pH
units
Arsenic
mg/I
7L 10
Lead i
!-g/I
C_
<
Iron
0. 0 _Z;'. mg/1
Manganese
O. 0-23. mg/I
Copper
Zinc
Cmg/1
Calcium
mg/I
Magnesium
mg1l_-'
Lem 02l"y
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
mg/l
Alkalinity-CBC03
Chloride
r mg/l
Color
units
Turbidity
NTU units
Fluoride
I mg/l
Date Received
Date Analyzed
OHS Form - 1441 R.v ini?q
Date Reported t] O 7 YRe rtf,4,By
110 1 V.TnA
Laboratory Number

Name of
System
Address
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
—-
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 — 306 N. WILMINGTON ST., RALEIGH 2761
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
o /)�irJ�i/IC
L
If!f-- i�SC/��� ZIP��
County / /'/V
Report To
Address:
S/-, PP/ S
r" / /;�, )_,)e �w /
k&Sb/ale, ZIP
Collected By: /l 51'.0 P / E .
Date Collected: Time: • �(J
Location of Sampling Point:
Remarks: f Po
U / rx /� r`
Sourc ater:
( 1 Ground
( ) Both
( ) Surface
( ) Purchased
.qnuLce of Sample:
( ) House Tap
( Well Tap
Type f Sample:
( 7 Raw
( ) Treated
TypeJof Treatment:
( /) None
( ) Lime
( ) Chlorinated
( ) Soda Ash
( j Fluoridated
( ) Polyphosphate
( ) Filtered '
( ) Water Softener
( ) Alum
( ) Other
Type of Analysis Desired:
( ) Regular Parameters
Both
( ) Optional Parameters
Regular Parameters
Results
Optional Parameters
1
/u, 1 G �S
(List as needed)
(��/
Results
pH
lU7,E4 units
Arsenic
G U /
mg/I
i �/
C(',,y
0yv/
Lead
D, 0
mg/I
Iron
O. O
mg/I
Manganese
p� p
mg/I
Cv.voa
Copper
p� O
mg/I
(�L✓Y✓
Zinc
mg/I
1k4"07~.
Calcium
9
mg/I
I t ver
C O.
Magnesium
._27—
mg/I
A4'--' 1A4—
C o_ �
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
4141mg/I
O5�
Alkalinity-CaCO3
mg/I
Chloride
5—
mg/I
Color
units
Turbidity
r-- NTU
units
Fluoride
mg/I
_
Date Received
Date Analyzed
OHS Fnrm - 1441 Rnv 1n/7Q
Date Reported Reported By
Laboratory Number V I bD MAY 1 1 89

STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 — 306 N. WILMINGTON ST., RALEIGH 27611 N
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM ✓C `(f-S
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
Name of
lG / Z&/-
�/
lJ /��
�j��0ur�cSystem
`
S �s �/ /��
So'°f Water:
Address
/-
(� ► Ground
Surface
( ) Both
( ) Purchased
ZIP J(9
/ l
�� to//
—
Sourcc f Sample:
- '--House Tap
County
10 c
Report To:
�j P /�
S
( ► Well Tap
Type Sample:
Raw(
) Treated
t° _--
�/�
Address:
Type Treatment:
��//
�V� N
None
Chlorinated
( ) Lime
( ) Soda Ash
ZIP
( ) Fluoridated
( ) Polyphosphate
( ) Filtered
( ) Water Softener
Collected By �n
�,
Ci i / /
( ) Alum
( } Other
Date Collected:
Time:
PM
Type of Analysis Desired:
( ) Regular Parameters
/
(� Both
Location of
Sampling Point: /
( ) Optional Parameters
Remarks:
f J^
/ C'1�4110�Ls
Regular Parameters
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
/
Results
pH
units/T/OS
Arsenic
mg/I
�' S-
Lead
gyp, D 3 mg/1
Iron
p� O�� mg/I
Manganese
O, p mg/I
Copper
C Ca 0 G— mg/I
O
Zinc
o. of % mg/I
Calcium
S mg/1
Magnesium
mg/I
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
�' mg/l
.O-rf--
O, 0,5—
Alkalinity-CaCO3
mg/1
Chloride
,- mg/l
Color
units }
Turbidity
�-- NTU units
Fluoride
mg/l r
Date Received _
Date Analyzed _
Date Reported Reported By
Laboratory Number U 1 b •7 r1A Y 1 1 b 7

STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047"= 306 N. WILMINGTON ST., RALEIGH 27611
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
Name f
7/ /0 I
System /C J (0 CJ
/ Gx
Sour of Water:
Address l/� /
( Ground
( ) Both
Surface
Purchased
Sourlce. of Sample:
Count �CJ (� / /
Y
( �1 House Tap
Report / l�J Pt° S
Well Tap
Type f'Sample:
(/) Raw
( ) Treated
To: rC-
%
Z` P!/ / �L,'t//. ��
Address: 1.9
Type�-Tei atment:
(/) None
( ) Lime
2 /
( ) Chlorinated
( ) Soda Ash
ZIP
( ) Fluoridated
( ) Polyphosphate
Collected By: l� J/m O � -5
Filtered
( ) Water Softener
( } Alum
( ) Other
I AM
Date Collected: 36
Time: / PM
Type of Analysis Desired:
�f JP !� '%G
1
( } Regular Parameters
(,-I' Both
Location of Sampling Point: {e/ / /
( ) Optional Parameters
Remarks: /—�- .. Po �j / rl, I '��
Regular Parameters
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed) ��
Results (/ Yl
pH
_G units
Arsenic
Q / mg/I
�,L/�
_ .
Lead
Q, p 3 mg/I
/ /
0 . JL
Iron
O. O mg/I
Manganese
O. D mg/I
Copper
0. ���— mg/I
l% • O d lJa—
Zinc
O. / mg/1
dyPOW
c o, vOs—
Calcium
e mg/I
C D
Magnesium
t�L� mg/I
•
00S—
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
Q mg/1
��
G
Alkalinity-CaCO3
mg/I
Chloride
mg/I
Color
—� units
Turbidity
NTU units
Fluoride
f mg/I
17
Date Analyzed
IjIbL)hAy1.189
Laboratory Number

Name of
System
Address
County
Report To:
Address:
STATE LABORATORY OFPUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION.OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047. - 30,6 N. WILMINGTON ST., RALEIGH 27611
�
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
i� SA PPk S
ZIP �D
'• �S �� //P ZIP aS'U
Collected By:
Sour of Water:
( /) Ground
( ) Both
( ) Surface
( ) Purchased
Sour�c'° f Sample:
( 1 House Tap
( ) Well Tap
Type o -Sample:
( Raw
( ) Treated
Type f-Treatment:
(• None'
( ) Lime
( j Chlorinated
( ) Soda Ash
( ) Fluoridated
( ) Polyphosphate
( ) Filtered
( ) Water Softener
( } Alum
( ) Other
Date Collected: G Time: C -JZ PM Type of Analysis Desired:
/�, ( ) Regular Parameters
Location of Sampling Point: O C���V G ( ) Optional Parameters
Remarks: L %
(/ Both
Regular Parameters
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
Results Y�
pH
G units
Arsenic
< O / mg/l
/ / GItrS 15z�
-•0•
Lead
p, d 3 mg/I
Iron
�OvO mg/I
Q
{
Manganese
tip,p mg/I
Copper
-C O, O mg/I
I -A
O.
Zinc
mg/I
f rwr�
C
Calcium
mg/I
hrd
Magnesium
O� / mg/I
Ve-4—
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
mg/I
< ep, 00 -s—
Alkalinity-CaCO3
mg/I
e%'GU4-
. U QU
Chloride
s mg/I
Color
�� units
Turbidity
_ NTU units
Fluoride
0 J mg/I
Date Received
Date Analyzed
DHS Form - 1441 Rev. 10/79
Date Reported Reported By
Laboratory Number U i 04 I11A 11 8'�
Mildred A. Kerhauah

STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 — 306 N. WILMINGTON ST., RALEIGH 27611�2
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
Name
/�'IP
System
X
Source °f Water:
Address
\. /
(/) Ground
Surface
( ) Both
( ) Purchased
ZIP �fSCJ
p /
�l //
Soy ce of Sample:
(�) House Tap
County
( ) Well Tap
Ty%. of Sample:
(' Raw
( ) Treated
Report To:
/Gl�
Address:
PO�P
i
Type Treatment:
ZIP
( /• 1 -None 1
( ) Chlorinated
' (• )' Lime
( ) Soda Ash
Fluoridated
( ) Polyphosphate
Collected By: h'1 —
( ) Filtered
( ) Alum
( ) Water Softener
( ) Other
Date Collected: Time: P
Type of Analysis Desired:
Regular Parameters
/)
Location of
/�
Sampling Point: d i✓7
( Both
/ G
( ) Optional Parameters
Remarks:
Regular Parameters
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
�� /CjS l��N �� esults
pH
units
Arsenic
G O mg/l
Lead
G O. !� 3 mg/I
C 3
Iron
{ O. 0-5— mg/I
Manganese
{ C. O mg/I
i,-r—
p
Copper
`—
D. p mg/1
wvy..
G CO.DES
Zinc
O .S mg/I
ikr Yni u,.y-
Calcium
--
mg/I..
O
D S
Magnesium
mg/1
!X
• UOU �
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
mg/I
Alkalinity-CaCO3
mg/I
Chloride
C ? mg/I
Color
units
Turbidity
�-� NTU units
Fluoride
mg/I
-
Date Received
Date Analyzed
OHS Form - 1441 Rev. 10/79
Date Reported Reported By
)Laboratory Number
lUioJ
Mildred A. Kprhaunh

n
- STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION'OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES 9
P.O. BOX 28047 — 306 N. WILMINGTON ST-., RALEIGH 27611
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM
Complete Alf Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
Name of %
System
Address
ZIP /.X�-2
County
Report To:
Address:
Source of Water:
( /) Ground - ( ) Both
( ) Surface ( ) Purchased
Sours -of Sample:
( House Tap
() Well Tap
Type,of Sample:
(� Raw ( ) Treated
Type;of Treatment:
(� None
(% :`Chlorinated
�C ZIP `• ( ) Fluoridated /
,r r'��� Filtered
Collected By: „ f` f�l '• � .
( ) Alum
l AM
Time:
Date Collected': G ( �5
PM _ -Type of Analysis Desired:
""Regular Parameters
Location of Sampling Point: Optional Parameters
/ a LI C
Remarks:04
( ) Lime
( ) Soda Ash
( ) Polyphosphate
( % ) --' Water Softener
( ) Other
(,-l- Both
Regular Parameters
G ResultsG'
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
`^
Results
_
pH
units
Arsenic
mg/I
/ G
Q s 27e-
Lead
mg/ I
/
Iron
C p� U mg/I
_
Manganese
p� p 3 mg/1
Copper :A _
0 ®� S— mg/I
Zinc
'� mg/I
-
- Calcium
mg/I
• s /
'
Magnesium
mg/I
-
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, MO
— mg/I
Alkalinity-CaCO3
mg/1
Chloride
mg/I
Color
units
Turbidity
NTU units
Fluoride
/� rtig/I
fj
'Date Received Date Reported 7. Reported By%
r.
MAY i 1 8 9
Date Analyzed Laboratory Number
DHS Form - 1441 Rev. 10/79 Mildred A. Kerbaunh

Name of
System
Address
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 — 306 N. WILMINGTON ST., RALEIGH 27611
U C
INORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSES -PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM
Complete All Items Above Heavy Line
(See Instructions on Reverse Side)
ZIP
County / T-
Report To
Address:
ZIP
Collected By:_
Date Collected: Time: 2 • /- p�
Location of Sampling Point: 140 t/,'- 7c
Source °f Water:
( /) Ground
( ) Both
( ) Surface
( ) Purchased
Source of Sample:
(� House Tap
( ) Well Tap
Type -of -Sample:
( ) Raw
( ) Treated
Type of Treatment:
(� None
( ) Lime
( ) Chlorinated
( ) Soda Ash
( ) Fluoridated
( ) Polyphosphate
( ) Filtered
( ) Water Softener
( ) Alum
( ) Other
Type of Analysis Desired:
( ) Regular Parameters
Both
( ) Optional Parameters
Remarks:
Regular Parameters
Results
Optional Parameters (List as needed)
�J
Results
pH
units
Arsenic
G O� 2 mg/I
! Q,y
Lead
� 2, O mg/I
// /
T! A S L41
O 2-
Iron
Oo O mg/I
Manganese
C pe O mg/I
Copper
O n C) mg/I
Zinc
C O, O mg/I
Y rl�tr►.r./
Calcium
Magnesium
Hardness-CaCO3 (Ca, Mg)
— g
m /I
�� mg/I
mg/I
C O.00S�
�� O/
Alkalinity-CaCO3
- mg/I
Chloride
�� j mg/I
�O.0C1�
Color
r----
units
Turbidity
�-- NTU units
Fluoride
< / o mg/I
Date Received
Date Analyzed
DHS Form - 1441 Rev. 10179
Date Reported -� l/��C� Reported By
Laboratory Number I )1Ai 1 1 8 /
Mildred A. Kerbauqh

INFLOW PERMEABILITY TESTING

INFLOW PERMEABILITY TESTING
Inflow permeabilty tests were performed in selected monitoring wells to estimate the hydraulic conductivity
of the formation materials exposed to the screened interval at each well location: Hydraulic conductivity
is a constant of proportionality relating to the ease with which a fluid passes through a porous medium.
The field procedure to calculate the hydraulic conductivity is as follows:
o Measure the depth to the ground water;
o Remove water from the borehole by bailing; and
o Measure the ground -water recovery rate.
The recovery rate of the ground water in the well is then plotted on semi -log graph paper and the
hydraulic conductivity calculated. The data are reduced and the hydraulic conductivities computed using
techniques described in NAVFAC Soil Mechanics Design Manual 7.1, May 1982, Condition A.

o
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
431 MINUET LANE
P.O. BOX 240674
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28224-0674
[phone]
JOB NO. -561 96 Ob ' Igo SHEET � OFF�]] I
JOB NAME S• 5�6- cS &V✓
�-
BY _�- DATE
CHECKED BY L DATE
r
�J T_I r n�''_C:G�' g r���o! - �.�c iE� {-'V10 J� �",'F r';` (✓
Fort, P/� h 7
=�—=—
u 1�+ e l'e i'C ' h yd rd � � � `� Co r�.C1; ✓; ��
T
m t
►1 e eFtec�, �L Or�ros �/ �rom ]; �- T-e�!', Dri 0 1
See 1 It
A33e a ve -0, 0 3-2 R-�p� . �r�-,e,6 0.03 �. — a. d 3 Z2
- - _ k .. 4-
D LM/ S +o 'o -CS. �lPer�. Cd Imo,
he
- 6 60�►� - 365d
vers,ok' 3 x I v x
or
-3
1 x I o �,� -� X I, o 3 4-1 64 C��,1-

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
a professional engineering and
earth science consulting firm
�lvl Ld �✓ / �'ti:rr`=A�t L• Cj � j t �T-
r JELL.2 K6::,5 W Co"
JOB NO. 5&— �IlsvG •�0 SHEET i OF 3
JOB NAME 'SOL/74-i0a 1 STflM-SS Fi.lzTtiL,,t W
By DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
�rN!Ac A `TvP Vr.. Ch
TM E
,4 !7
0.0
-7. 6-D
2- S = /,/o
,
v. 5
35-. ba
ySs
0,79
1p
154.5 b
3. 7
o, ,� o
Z'-)
0, Y7
2-.3
0,38
�.s
3a -
0.31
3.s
VCR o�
o'2-
D. S
v
.
_
!
o
- -Z--- 7,
. a .• O �Cv�z v. �ac�

- c7z
'L7
_ Z
,a_ � Z
_-Z,(9
�•o z'a ah S/ CIO
Z GLL'a Qg G Vim/ f
Cl'
o S v'1 Fri zv��?
3iv(l a-3NODHO
Dlb'4 A8
DV4VN aor
JO z IDDHS nz c��y,-q "ON eOr
Z-, s �� cl -77-,--2
W.l?f 8uu7nsuoo ajuatos yi iva
puv 3U7.Jddll.7,?U,7 7vuotssafoid v
'ONI `lViN3WN081AN3 Mdl

JOB NO. 5G" GLfoDG •-�O SHEET-3— OF
JOB NAME �cOL77 '3—'V STf7L
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC: L'%,�
a professional engineering and BY DATE
earth science consulting firm CHECKED BY DATE 3T� G
(�✓C4 Z-
%—iP'j'i � �rc�t/, L✓ATf-r� �. r;✓EL </'{ � .d Y �7 "�) � � !'7` b
I O0 o S, o'5-
DZ /2.30 p qy
11,30
//, o 0 4P
� / o. E3 ..3 � 0j. 0,
1/i o.�z
a
- ..__._....__�V7D -.. L). S ./ S o
4�/o L"o,
L/2s
D,.7 „z
/�e= �7
I ---/_ - - _ems-------�--�------ _ _ -=-
t
0.97
D oL3'>C

N -momom-1—
GARAGE
I
I
omcE
I
Q
I �
I
—x x
W 1
I
� 1
1
6' DLA SDR-21 PVC PIPE PUMPING STATION
f2O' x 30' FENCED AREA
3' ELECTRICAL. CONDUIT W� 12' SWING GATE
(SEE NOTES 4 AND 5)
TANKS O O -- —� RW-5
00
��O OO GRAVEL ACCESS
0\
s�ORACE ROAD \
MAIN PLANT
r, II
1
FORMER
POND
FORMER
POND
R =FR N. S
- LAW EINIRONMENTAL
SOUTTIERN STATES FERDUZER
PLMR, JOB. No. 55-1570.
FIGURE 2, REVISED 11-91.
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
(SEE NOTE 1)
DIA SDR-21 PVC PIPE
LEGEND:
—i I— I
RAILROAD
—x—x—x—
FENCE
----
PROPERTY LINE
— ... .... —
CREEK
0
UTILITY POLE
DIRECTION OF FLOW
RW-2
Q
PROPOSED GROUND WATER RECOVERY WELL
NOTE:
1. SEE DRAWING 91-161—E41 FOR TRENCH DETAIL
2. FOR WELL HEAD DETAIL SEE DRAWING 91-161—E41.
3. COORDINATE WITH CITY OF STATESVILLE FOR ESTABLISHMENT
OF NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE
4. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 5' PVC CONDUIT
AND PULL BOX FOR UTILITY USE TO ESTABLISH NEW SERVICE
5. LOCATION OF 3' CONDUIT SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED.
6. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE ACCORDING TO NATIONAL
ELECTRIC CODE AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL
CODES.
I
r1
100 200 FEET
PIPING AND CONDUIT LAYOUT
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
Canom-eEryiro=ental

TYPICAL RECOVERY WELL' HEAD DETAIL
ScA :
I—r 0 1'-t 2'-5
480 VOLT, 3 PHASE
METER TO BE LOCATED
TD SUIT LOCAL POWER
AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS
(SEE NOTE 4)
SERVCE ENTRANCE SWITCH
00AMT
100 AMP
3 PHASE
MOM PO.12G�
t TSSm CHANNEL
VZ CH 80, PVC
2 UIRED
N
SEANCE ENTRANCE/LAYOLIT-111'f STATION
CONTROL PANEL/CFMRT RECORDER
EXISINATURAL
SURFA 10 GROUNO
SURFACE (SEE NOTE 2)
SOIL BICKFILL
COMPACTED TO 85R
STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM
MOUNTING BOARD
I—x—x x x—x i
z
DR/ DENSITY I ..
''ti` .; ,:
':�.!::2'+:1�
•A
lil {_-LT L}"{: ';.:h..:C�.
x
SCONNFLT
:'
x WET WE1.1 MOUHIED
30, PVC CONDUIT
12' SWNC CATE
1 1/Y POWER SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT
PUA6� SUTION
CONTROL SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT
VC CONDUIT H
m
�':�.lu.: ' l •
12S SING (SEE NQTE 3) BACKFLl
OMPACTED TO o5S STANDARD
PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
n
T`X
tc�lN.iti?.
DIA sDR-21 PVC
O.D. = 4.5
j,^r xSi.
I.D. - 4.285
x
3NOUTT
TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION
SCAM V - 1'-O•
1'-V 0 t'-Q T-0'
RECOVERY WELL
PANEL SWITCH
�A CH
V THICK PLYWOO
M.M. BOARD
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I .
1 1/Y SCH 80. PVC
CO DUR
`r SCH Bo. PA: CONDUIT =
SERVICE ENTRANCE LAYOUT -LIFT STATION
NOT TO SCALE
Mi
t
2
CONTROL PANELICHART RECORDER LAYOUT
NOT TO SCALE
HICH FENCE
LIFT STATION PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
1. THE GROUND WATER LEVEL AT SOUTHERN STATES
PLANT IS APPROXIMATELY 10' TO 20' BELOW
GROUND SURFACE. IF HIGH GROUND WATER LEVEL
IS ENCOUNTERED DURING THE EXCAVATION OF THE
PIPE TRENCH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER BEFORE ANY FURTHER EXCAVATION.
2. FOR GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS SEE 1969 U.S.G.S.
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, STATESVILLE EAST, AND SHEPARDS,
NORTH CAROLING
CK PLYWOOD
INO BOARD 3. REFER TO TABLE 1005-2 OF NORTH CAROLINA DEFT.
OF TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ROADS AND STRUCTURES', ,TAN. 1990 EDITION FOR
GRADATION.
4. COORDINATE WITH CITY OF STATESVILLE FOR PROVISION
OF 100 AMP SERVICE.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE T CONDUIT AND PULL
BOX FOR UTILITY USE TO ESTABLISH NEW SERVICE
RECORDER
6. ALL WORK SHALL BE ACCORDING TO NATIONAL ELECTRIC
CODE AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES.
C
ELECTRICAL DETAILS
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
Canofti-eEnvironmentat

NEW SERVICE
430 VOLT
240/1
7.6 AMP 3.4 AMP 3.4 AMP
RW-2 RW-4 RW-5
1
I
1 14 AMP 14 AMP I
L- - - - - - - - - - -----------J
ONE LINE DIAGRAM - POWER DISTRIBUTION PACKAGE SYSTEM
NOTES:
1. POWER WIRING TO PUMPS SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 012 AWG.
2. ELECTRICALALL NATIONAL ELECTRIPERFORMED ACCORDING C ODE (AN %NFPA770) AND ALLAPPLICABLE
STATE AND LOCAL CODES.
3. PROVIDE AUXILIARY CONTACT ON MOTOR STARTERS TO INTERLOCK
WELL PUMPS AS REQUIRED.
ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
CanoweEnvironmental

HOA 102
HOA 104 C I }
HOA 105 V
HOA 106
, V _
HOA 10
T-t WET WELL SUMP
DISCHARGE TO
FOURTH CREEK
LEGEND:
ALARM LIGHT
106
LSHL LSHL � _ LSHL HOA
,D5,D4
HOA Haa HOA 102 ,02 ,D7
PANEL MOUNTED HAND -OFF -AUTO SWITCH
�HL
LEVEL SWITCH HIGH/LOW
105 104 1D2 106
LEVEL ELEMENT
01-
- - - - - = LEVEL SWITCH HIGH HIGH
106
-- -- -- F01
FLOW TOTALIZING INDICATOR
11 _ _�_ _11
HOA _ a.- I HOA _ d
a- - 1 HDA
o- ,D5 — tpa _ toz - e FLOW TOALIZING INDICATOR WITH PANEL
LSHH 106 LSHH 106 LSHH 106 106
LSHL 105 RW_5 LSHL 104 RW-4 LSHL 102 RW-2 MOUNTED REND OUT
O ELECTRICAL INTERLOCK
GROUND WATER RECOVERY WELLS a SUBMERSIBLE PUMP
PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
P-6 SUMP PUMP STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
D4 NORMALLY OPEN VALVE PREPARED FOR
N NORMALLY CLOSED VALVE SOUTHERN STATES
*--4 CHECK VALVE COOPERATIVE, INC.
-18-94 -GED PIPE MATERIAL . 1. 1 D. CanoicieEnvironmental

EXISTING GROUND —
SURFACE (SEE NOTE
NATURAL SOIL BACKFILL
COMPACTED TO B5R
STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM
DRY DENSITY
I I
I
r
/2S SAND (SEE NOTE 4) BACKFILL
OMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD
PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
-
6' SDR-21 PVC PIPE.
O.D. - 6.625' ID. - 5.995
DIA. FROM RECOVERY WELLS
TO LIFT STATION)
TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION
SCALE: 1' - V-T
1'-0' 0 1'-0' 2'-0'
B' THICK
BLANKET
CLASS A STONE (SEE NOTE 5)
AVERAGE STONE SIZE
IS APPROX. 4'
6' SDR-21 PVC PIPE.
RIPRAP BLANKET LAYOUT
SCALE: 1/2' - 1'-Tf
2'-0' 0 2'-0' 4--0'
CREEK FLOW
4' x 5' x 4' HIGH CONCRETE WELL COVER, WATER TIGHT,
BOX ,NO BOTTOM, 2' MGM TOP ALUMINUM, .W ELECTRICAL RECOVERY WELL
RING AND 2' HIGH SECTION, ALUM CONNECTION
A THICK CONCRETE WALLS, 5.-�
AS
CONCRETE PRODUCTS,
INC., MODEL No. PL-4050 WITH RIGID ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 6' DIA WELL CASING,
STEEL SAFETY DOUBLE DOOR CARBON STEEL
OR EQUAL ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT
r c\
WET WELL / / \ \ SWITCH 5'_p
4' DIA. HOLE FOR FLOWMETER
.ND IT, TYPICAL EACH SIDE r PRESSURE GAGE \ \ GROUND SURFACE
PLUG AS REQUIRED �/ 0 - 40 PSI \� (SEE NOTE 3)
XO
10' B' IT
I ICI&r x r REDUCER
_ I I CARBON STEEL
WELDED FITTING h
b G DIA. SCH 40 PIPE,
!. CARBON STEEL
0
i
1 O' I V 4' S' 5'
(MIN.)
b
•- E SDR-21 PVC PIPE, F
° 1 10,000k FEET LONG
4' x 3' REDUCING
150 GPM INDICATOR/TOTALIZER TEE (SEE NOTE 6)
67
TYP. ALL AROUND
FLOWMETER, WATER SPECIALTIES CO.
MODEL ML-G4 WITH TR-16
TRANSMITTER, WIRE CONNECTED TO
4' GATE VALVE, CAST IRON BODY.
IN-48 RECORDER
CLASS 125, STOCKHAM G676 OR
EQUAL
1 1/Y TO 3/4• COMPACTED CRUSHED STONE
No 4 NORTH CAROUNA SOFOR
TRANESPORTATION
STANDARDS ECCIIFICATI NO
LIFT STATION VALVE PIT NOTES:
ROADS AND STRUCTURES' TABLE 1005-1
1. All PIPE IS C DIA., SCH 40. CARBON STEEL
EXCEPT AS NOTED.
LIFT STATION VALVE' PIT SECTION
2. FLANGES ARE 1501 SUP -ON, WITH
FALL
LAT FACE, CARBON EL
SCALE: 3/4' - l'-O'
3. DIMENSIONS SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM VENDOR
CATALOGS.
V-4' 0 1'-4'
4' x 5' VALVE PR, 2' HIGH TOP
RING AND 2' HIGH SECTION,
Cr THICK CONCRETE WALLS,
ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS,
INC., SERIES 4050 WITH DOUBLE
LEAF STEEL SAFETY DOOR OR EQUAL
GROUND SURFACE
(SEE NOTE J)
4' x 2' REDUCER
CARBON STEEL
WELDED FITTING
4' DIA. SCH 40 PIPE,
CARBON STEEL
r 4' SDR-21 PVC PIPE.
`Or DV PRE -CAST OPENINGS FOR PIPES,
TYPICAL EACH END WALL
2' TURBINE FLOWMETER WITH OPENINGS WILL BE SEALED WTTH A CEMENT
PATCH IN THE FIELD
TOTALIZER. BADGER OR EQUAL -
2' SWING CHECK VALVE 6TYPICAL ALL AROUND
RECOVERY WELL VALVI_ PIT NOTES 2* GATE VALVE
1. All PIPE IS Y DIA., SCH 40, CARBON STEEL 1 1/2' TO 3/4' COMPACTED CRUSHED STONE
SIZE No. 4, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
EXCEPT AS NOTED. TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
2. ALL FIANCES ARE 2*- 1501 THREADED, WITH ROADS AND STRUCTURES' TABLE 1005-1
FLAT FACE, CARBON STEEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED.
RECOVERY WELL VALVE PIT SECTION
SCALE: 3/4' - 1'-Ci
1'-4' 0 V-4' 2•-e'
NOTES:
1. THE INVERT ELEVATION MAY VARY DEPENDING ON THE
FINAL SURVEY OF THE DISCHARGE POINT.
2. THE GROUND WATER LEVEL AT SOUTHERN STATES
PLANT IS APPROXIMATELY 10' TO 20' BELOW
GROUND SURFACE. IF HIGH GROUND WATER LEVEL
IS ENCOUNTERED DURING THE EXCAVATION OF THE
PIPE TRENCH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER BEFORE ANY FURTHER EXCAVATION.
3. FOR GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS SEE 1969 U.S.G.S.
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, STATESVILLE EAST, AND SHEPARDS,
NORTH CAROLINA.
4. REFER TO TABLE 1005-2 OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPi.
OF TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ROADS AND STRUCTURES', JAN. 1990 EDITION FOR
GRADATION.
5. REFER TO SECTION 1042-2 OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPT.
OF TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ROADS AND STRUCTURES', JAN. 1990 EDITION FOR
GRADATION.
6. 3' LINE TO DIVERT WATER TO PLANT WATER TOWER.
CAP LINE WITH BLIND FLANGE. SEE DESIGN CALCULATION
DWG. 91-161-A30, SKETCH No. 11. LINE WILL CONNECT
TO A BOOSTER PUMP PIT, WHICH SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
THE FUTURE AS REQUIRED.
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
Canoni-eEnvironmentat

A
900
Bso
800
=L 780
to
i
760
Z
O
Q
740
660
640
620
RW—B RW-4 RW-2
PROFILE A -A'
VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST
VERDCAL SCALE
20 0 20 40 FEET
HORIZONUL SCALE
100 0 100 200 FEET
VERTICAL EXAGGERATION = 5x
REFERENCES,
— LAW ENVIRONMENTAL. 'HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS',
SOUTHERN STATES FERTILIZER PLANT, JOB No. 56-1570.
FIGURE 7. REVISED NOVEMBER 1991.
A'
900
880
860
e40
820
eoo
780 .7
N
760 w`
Z
O
Q
740
720
700
680
660
640
620
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE GROUND SURFACE (SOIL)
— — APPROXIMATE GROUND WATER ELEVATION
AR
./7 APPROXIMATE AUGER REFUSAL ELEVATION (AR)
TOR
APPROXIMATE TOP OF ROCK (TOR)
SCREEN INTERVAL
KEY PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
PROFILE A -A'
PROPOSED RECOVERY WELLS
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
Canonw-Enviro=ental
DATE 1-25-94 FIGURE 5 DRAWING NUMBER
SCALE AS SHOWN 91-161—E32 2

P
1
1
1
1
4-94
ADDED TANKS
ISSUED TO NCDEHNR
t8-94
ISSUE / REVISION
50
K65W6" E7Q \
eK65W6'9 RW-5
SAK I-V REFERENCES:
—:LAW ENVIRONMENTAL
Itp�ta acv cEa SOUTHERN STATES FERTILIZER
PLANT, JOB. NO. 56-9606,
FIGURE 1, REVISED 6-91.
K65W6"C"&
O
K65W7"% 0RW-4
QpeK65W7'A"
\� K65W7"H"
NOTES:
1. THE EXISTING TEST WELL RW-2 WILL BE
USED AS A GROUND WATER RECOVERY WELL.
2. ESTIMATED RADIUS OF INFLUENCE WAS
MEASURED WHILE PUMPING RW-2 ONLY
AT APPROXIMATELY 50 gpm. RADIUS OF
INFLUENCE WILL CHANGE WHEN PUMPING
RW-4 AND RW-5 IN ADDITION TO RW-2.
LEGEND:
-I-- i - RAILROAD
x x— FENCE
-----PROPERTY LINE
i- CREEK
DIRECTION OF FLOW
TEST/OBSERVATION WELL
LEI WATER TABLE MONITORING WELL
LEI DEEP MONITORING WELL
- 10—CONCENTRATION ISOPLETH FOR NO2 + NO3 (MG/L)
ESTIMATED BOUNDARY OF RADIUS OF INFLUENCE
(SEE NOTE 2)
r
0 PROPOSED GROUND WATER RECOVERY WELL
K65W7' G"
K65W7" F"
1
R�\ K65W7"C"e R (SEE NOTE ��1
2 JtI
K65W7" B'' ,gam
K65W7" E"e
\SO,
K65W7" D"® _
-RW-1 APPROXIMATE SCALE .
`\ j200 0 200 FEET
/ PROPOSED GROUND WATER
RECOVERY WELL LOCATION PLAN
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
/ PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
CSCofueEnvito=ental
DATE: 3-5-92 FIGURE 4 DRAWING NUMBER
SCALE: AS SHOWN 91-161-86

j
1
1 µ�,M JCv CIA
ISSUED TO NLOEHNR 910kA
SION OWN. BY CK-0 BY�.0BY
ISSUE / REVINoE
SUINEYS. PHOTOGRAM4ETERIC
p�p401R AERLAE R0. N.C.. SHEET Nu.s
ot
SpMCES, GREENSDO
aTszoz aw.az aTs3.oa. aTsa.a. a72
AND an3.aE. DATED MARa+ �seE.
CIy BOMURG MAP Ne.S 5N AND FJ,
IREDELL Co" TA% MAP No. 5N
�. RAILROAD
UNIMPROVED ROAD
--- PROPERTY LINE
_..._� CREEK
CLEM
w mDmD
TREE LINE
L459eE
LOT NUMBER
PROPOSED DISCHARGE PIPE ROUTE
0RW-2
PROPOSED RECOVERY WELL
)LINA
'ES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
CanouieEnviro=ental
DATE 1-13-94 FIGURE 3 DRAWING NUMBER
SCALE AS SHOWN 91-161—E25

N
0
KDOW4 K65W6" B"
GARAGE KS
❑ ED
STORAGE
®K65W5
KOM QK65W6"E"
OOK65W6"P," RW-50
0n K65W6"C"�
O
RFR NCS•
- LAW ENVIRONMENTAL
SOUTHERN STATES FERTUZER
PLANT. JOB. No. 56-1570,
FlGURE 2. REVISED 11-91.
0K65W8
LEGEND:
- F---F --i RAILROAD
—_— —�— FENCE
---- PROPERTY LINE
— — CREEK
--
DIRECTION OF FLOW
TEST/OBSERVATION WELL
m
LEI WATER TABLE MONITORING WELL
I
I
LEI DEEP MONITORING WELL
O
PROPOSED GROUND WATER RECOVERY WELL
O
NCDEHNR MONITORING WELL (ABANDONED)
I
I
NOTE:
1. THE EXISTING TEST WELL RW-2 WILL BE
USED AS A GROUND WATER RECOVERY WELL
to K65W6" D"
i
RW-
K65W7'r 0RW-4 K65W7'E"'5
K65W7��K65W7'A
FORMER
J POND K65W7' H"
No. 1
�� FORMER K65W7'C'e RW(SEE NOTE
POND �`
K65W7' B"
\ •.� K65W7' D"m
\' 9RW-1 j.
i
SCALE
100 0 100 200 FEET
WELL LOCATION PLAN
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
CanonieEnviro=ental

ii:
REFERENCESo
— PIEDMONT AERL L SURVEYS. PHOTOGRAMM71C
SERVICES, GREENSBORO, N.C.. SHEET No.
4762.02. 4763.02. 4763.04. 4764.04. 4772.01
AND 4773.01, DATED MARCH JSB1.
— CHABERSBURG MAP No.S 5N AND FJ.
— IREDELL CO.. TAX MAP No. 5N
l
1 -r . . . RAILROAD
====__° UNIMPROVED ROAD
PROPERTY LINE
CREEK
DIRECTION OF FLOW
CLEAR
wD DDm TREE LINE
6538E LOT NUMBER
PROPOSED DISCHARGE PIPE ROUTE
0RW-2 PROPOSED RECOVERY WELL
3 FEET
)LINA
PREPARED FOR
SOUTHERN STATES
COOPERATIVE, INC.
Canonw-Enviro=ental