20061151 Ver 3_Triage Comments_20101201

DWQ#
Triaged By:
Reviewer 1
Reviewer 2
Reviewer 3
Use this form instead of writing inside the folder
Triage omment Sheet
l r
3
- -C? Date:
itAWro,
Date: 10 to
Date:
? Issue Project (Reviewer 1) ?
Iss e w'th conditi ns (Re wer 1)
?? vlill Issue Project (Reviewer 2)

VI' W Iro U
4

Issue with conditions (Reviewer 2)

?
?
? More Information (Reviewer 1)
Return Application (Reviewer 1)
Send to Regions (Reviewer 1) ? More Information (Reviewer 2)
? Return Application (Reviewer 2)

? Send to Regions (Reviewer 2)

SATriage Forms\Triage Issue Sheet.doc
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
06-1151v6 Salem Village Subdivision (Apex Peakway)
AML Comments
December 1, 2010
Please address the following issues with regard to the conceptual stormwater management
plan:
a. BMP 1 is proposed to treat portions of Phases 2A and 3. Please provide evidence that
the BMP is adequately sized to handle the flow from both of these two phases. Also,
include a note on the plans that states that if the two phases are not constructed
simultaneously, then there will be adequate Sediment and Erosion Control Devices to
treat runoff from the later phase prior to stormwater being discharged to BMP 1.
b. It appears that a portion of the drainage area to BMP 1 is at a lower elevation than the
BMP itself.
c. The delineation of the drainage areas does not appear to follow contour lines.
d. Significant portions of Phases 3 or 4 are not included in the drainage areas of any of the
conceptual BMPs. Please either rework the drainage areas to include these
unaccounted for areas or provide an explanation as to why those areas were omitted.