WQ0001863_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (13)

DIV OF WATER QUALITY Fax:[phone]
Dec 31 '98 11:47 P.01/01
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James 13. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.)E., Director
Mr. Eddie Nichols
Town of Mount holly
131 S. Main St.
PO Box 406
Mount Holly, NC 29120
NCEE-)ENR
Nortrrt Cnrtour,p. DMIAN'rMeNT OF
ENVIRCNMENT A'40 NATURAL RESOURCES
December 31, 1999
Re: Rescission of Notice of Violation
Land Application of 13iosolids
PonnitNumber: WQ0001863
'.town of Mount Holly
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Nichols:
The Non -Discharge C:ompliauce ! Enforcement Unit is in reooipt of your response darYod December 02, 149$ and has
further reviewed the submitted 1997 anuual report_ The Notice of Violation issued November 24, 1998 is hereby
re:,cinded. €c'1
As a reminder, all supporting data to verify Pathogen Reduction and Vector ,Attractic,7i Reduction must be clearly
show compliance wit 40 CFR 503. Please reference state guidance dated November 17, 1998 for applicability of
the SOUR test, .1
Nothing in this loiter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with
all applicable laws and regulations.
If you hflve any questions, please call Kevin Barnett of the Non -Discharge Compliance 1 Enforcement Unit at 919-
733-508 5 ext_ 529_
Sincerely,
►'ram _ �,::
�fieff PouparL, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance Enforcement' Unit
cc: Central Fibs
Non Discharge Compliance/Rnforcement Unit- w/attachments ce
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
far
F.0.13ox 29535, Raleigh, No, -Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax 919-7a5-6048
An Equal Opportud4y- liirmative .Actign Employer _" lam recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Jim Hope, Councilman
Andy Stewart, Councilman
Michael Helms, Councilman
December 2, 1998
Mr. Kevin Barnette
NCDENR
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
City of Mount Holly
131 South Main Street
Post Office Box 406
Mount Holly, North Carolina 28120
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
U
04 ti
a O
►� um �
Frank E. McLean, Mayor
Phyllis B. Harris, Mayor Pro Tern
Subject: Notice of Violation
City of Mount Holly
Permit Number: WQ0001863
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Barnett:
CE
�, I
VED
ULU 7 199
Bryan Hough, Councilman
Robert D. Black, Councilman
Phillip G. Ponder, Jr., City Manager
c Lll`'r SECi101H
-DEC
Please find attached a revised report for Sample # 97-2915 and a letter from Par
Laboratories explaining the error in sample identification. According to Par
Laboratories, the "9" was inadvertently left off during data entry. This made the apparent
difference between 7/2 (reported) and 7/29 (correct).
Also, a copy of your correspondence was forwarded to our land application
contractor to inform them to use the correct report forms in subsequent reports.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (704) 822-
2939.
Sincerely,
c&ez;��
Eddie Nichols
Public Works Director
Cc: Dave Motil, BioNomic Services, Inc.

L
RORIES, INC.
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 Graham Park Drive
PO Box Al 1483
Charlotte, NC 28241-1483
NC Cert # 20; SC Cart # 99003001
Jimmy Haas
City of Mount Holly
P.O. Box 406
Mount Holly, NC 28120
Dear Jimmy,
Enclosed is the revised report for the Sample # 97-2915 collected on July 29, 1997.
The original report incorrectly identified the sample as 7/2 Grab. Apparently the "9" was
left off of the I.D. when we logged it into our system.
I will fax a copy to you and send the original in the mail.
I apologize for the error.
Sincerely,
, 11- /C t
Russell M. Everett
Administrator

PAR
LABORATORIES, INC.
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 Graham Park Drive
PO Box 411483
Charlotte, NC 28241-1483
NC Cart # 20, SC Cart N 99003001
December 1, 1998
Reference No: 97 2915
Made For: City Of Mount Holly
P.O. Box 406
Mount Holly, NC 28120
Attention: Jimmy Haas
Analyses Of: Submitted Sample for SOUR'test
Marked: 7/29/97 Grab
Received On: 7/29/97
Analyses:
(mg/hr/gr)
SOUR .85 8/05 1500 GJ
Respectfully submitted:
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
q?4-•
— 3
Joh fS.Rice
Laboy Director

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard; Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. W.E. Nichols, Il, Public Works Director
City of Mount Holly
Post Office Box 406
Mount Holly, North Carolina 28120
Dear Mr. Nichols:
1 • WANCDENR
r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
'.,'i".'ve.23.i 3x'si*.d..r 5 Via$
December3, 1998 &'V"-"TUP%AL ts�'::'YBJY.i.°€iv
DEC 8 1998
al�1Sl Q ' Ma"�.,�rIMEN171 W9 E 16EP7
lit 1 E ErRom"1 Ilfnaf
Subject: Permit No. WQ0001863
City of Mount Holly .
Land Application of Water and Wastewater Residuals
Gaston County
In accordance with your application received on August 7, 1998, we are forwarding herewith Permit No.
WQ0001863, dated December 3, 1998, to the City of Mount Holly for the operation of a water and wastewater residuals land
application program. Permit No. WQ0001863 was modified to add 130 tons per year of water residuals to the land application
program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 29, 2000, shall void Permit No. WQ0001863
issued June 29, 1995, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay particular attention
to the monitoring and reporting requirements contained in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required operational information will result in future, compliance problems. Also, please be aware of the
buffer requirements listed in Condition I. 6. Previous staff reports have indicated the presence of two unbuffered wells on
Field TJ-9 and Field MH 2-2. Staff reports also indicated that additional buffering was required at four other fields due to off -
site residences.
If any part, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right to request an
adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this permit.. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be
final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this matteZPreston
t Ms. Joni Cardin at [phone] extension
509.
S�'_A. Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Gaston County Health Department
David Mofel, Bio::Nomic-Services, Inc.
Mooresyille_Regional Office, Water Quality SectioP
Mooresville Regional Office, Groundwater Section
Bob Cheek, Groundwater Section, Central Office
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
PO Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

7. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local, state, and
federal) which have jurisdiction.
The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its extension.
Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the facilities described
therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time and under such conditions and
limitations as it may deem appropriate.
This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate any conditions, limitations and
monitoring requirements the Division deems necessary in order to adequately protect the environment
and public health.
10. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreements between the Permittee and the
landowners/lessees are in full force and effect. The land owner agreements are considered expired
concurrent with the expiration date of the permit and must be renewed at the same time the permit is
renewed.
Permit issued this the gird day of December, 1998
NORTH C"OLINA ENVERONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
,/A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0001863
10

' 9 a
1310-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
Specializing in today's needs for environmental protection.
--� 516 Roundtree Road • Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
GJ 6 1(Yb
C-=�, 33G� i
TOWN OF MOUNT HOLLY
RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
PERMIT #WQ0001863
1997 ANNUAL REPORT
PREPARED BY:
BIO-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28217
PHONE: [phone]
A Carylon Company

Y 1310-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
Specializing in today's needs for environmental protection.
516 Roundtree Road • Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
1997 PROJECT OVERVIEW
BIO-NOMIC SERVICES, INC. land applied 2,106,000 gallons in
1997 utilizing 100.1 acres.
The long range goals of this program are to provide a cost
efficient and environmentally sound biosolids beneficial use
option. Bio-Nomic Services, Inc. philosophy of promoting
beneficial utilization of the wastewater biosolids through
land application will satisfy not only the clients needs, but
also benefit the farmers in the program as well.
During the year, six (6) fields on two (2) sites were
utilized. All six (6) of the fields had previously received
the Mount Holly material. Because of soil pH and lime
content of the Mount Holly solids, no additional lime was
applied to the fields in 1997.
Please contact us at our toll free number, [phone], if
you have any questions concerning this report or any aspect
of the Land Application Program.
A Carylon Company
2

1997
TOWN OF MOUNT HOLLY
MONTHLY BIO-SOLIDS APPLICATION SUMMARY
GALLONS DRY TONS
JANUARY
-0-
-0-
FEBRUARY
-0-
-0-
MARCH
-0-
-0-
APRIL
-0-
-0-
MAY
656,500
55.3
JUNE
-0-
-0-
JULY
-0-
-0-
AUGUST
767,000
46.06
SEPTEMBER
682,500
40.98
OCTOBER
-0-
-0-
- NOVEMBER
-0-
-0-
DECEMBER
-0-
-0-
TOTALS
2,106,000
142.34
i

r
HYDROLOGIC LABORATORIES, INC
_.
-;
tit
Aug 29, 1997 4 t F 4
� r
y .I
3
+} F r
;T
Hy�droLo' is Charlotte '
w
Mr. Charles Cabomss f
"
Carolina -Business Center a`�
I8S.South Bldgg ,2848 Suite E y
5
Charlotte; NC 28208
Dear Mr aCaboruss, r
-
-
Please enclosed the report for 1 sar4� ple exec at Hydrologic La oratories, Inc. on
.
.find
19 Aug 1997 for your'pro�ect number, MT ,HOLLY NC. The report reference is' L5529.
If you have any questions,' please call [phone].
i 5
t 1
i
>
4
T
Rose_Murpby ; ry
Project Manager r r
F f
r
ff .
(
ti �s -� Y
t 1 w
n
G d Y
.
03-659 -5064RTSEETH LORAD 80601 3695

1
HYDROLOGIC LABORATORIES, INC
Sample D'ate/Tune .:.
16 Aug 97 16:00
Page 1

{ r. �� ; ,_
h { �4 <
HYDROLOGIC
-t •�>z
N LABORATORIES , INC . f
_.,1
��
® 'r
4 § }4 = M Y -
s^- � r ,s-^ r 3 Ay -
- tI
zY �' DATE'AND TIlVIE SLTPvIMAR�'
,'
--' t r
rw
Company Name 'H ' 0lb gic a l..: I ? u
Projeet MT 'HOLLY NC„$ ;° xsy�� } ; r
�+,"�.� r cry tr�y� s?,''1y3....Z,� �" �...4
IiydroLoglc�L in�Number L5�29 z
.,. p
Y
.... .. 4 ...... >:?
.. \ HK{+4.. .. .v. .. ..v. .: :::::::: .. :: .:: •: .. :: .. i ::::: v:'i` :. i?•::::;:{•isii:•iiiiii:;{ni::.::::i•i:::.::}::ii:i':%jii$;:;';:i;:i:?:%:;:;:;: ..,:,
SAMPLE NUMBER• 529 i ; �GLIENT ID fi . omm 0— M......... , 1VIATRICES Leachate, Soil
y .r `
SW846 ,131178150 08/16/97 16 00 08/20/97 08/27/97 20:32
SW846131118080 08/16/97:16 00 08/25/97, 08/27/97 22:35;.
SW 1311 ° o * ' 08L16/97j 16 00 08/27/9, 08/28/97 15:08 , ,
SW1311 � , Y ° 08716/97;16 00 08/2d/9 08/22/97 10 12,'.
1,1
SW1311 y 08/16/97 16 00 ;08/25/97 .08/27/97 18:34;:
. ` SW 131'1. 4 r 08/16/97 16 00 08/25/97, 08/25/'. 12:52
T'
z { t t ,
? r
a
.
"t 1 M1. —
- 4 i - 4
4 cr 3 t'r x �' z.
.'. s r '� -
''
i x t s '-r � l S, r}
d�
�,
.,
s a d
`: : A
.: l� ;
s '\x - ' d" f . - - - .
, « 1
/S e .
vim. Ors tfi . .i -t_.
1 4 5 -
.� zt Y .
1p r 's - r:
YY r t �"ti
t
s��5 .� r
' "x yr h .
'i' { a
4, Z :t i .
�j C
'7. lr'I'll C y :5 - .
','
r j� as ' t .
y_ -
'i
..
J 1
x� j` Page 1 • . -
r i. t • < t r . a t
b .
a

Chain of Custody Record HYDROLOGIC, INCPage of
Q Asheville, NC
❑ Norcross, GA
Q Frankfort KY ❑ Lumberton, NC ❑ Charlotte, NC ❑ Morrisville, NC
[phone]
[phone]
[phone] (910)
738-6190 [phone] [phone]
❑ Brighton, CO ❑ Orlando, FL
Q Lexington, SC
Q Richmond, VA Q Burlington, NC
Q Macon, GA
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone] [phone]
[phone]
Client: — ----
Project No.: /
y�
REQUESTED PARAMETERS
LAB CODE I.D.
A = Asheville, NC
/
Report Address: /
P
Invoice Address:
B = Burlington, NC
,I
C = Charlotte, NC
D = Denver, CO
E = Lexington, SC
Attn: /
Attn.
G = Macon,GA
K = Frankfort, KY
L = Lumberton, NC
Phone No.: J
Sampled By:
Fax No.:
S q . /G�/�
P.O. No:
M= Morrisville, NC
N = Norcross, GA
State Samples Collected
TURNAROUND TIME
/
O = Orlando, FL
❑ 24 Hours Q 48 Hours
R = Richmond, VA
Q 5 Days ❑ 10 Days Date Needed:
S = Subcontracted
Sample ID
Date
'lime
Grab/
Matrix
Contain
p
Preserv.
REMARKS
t _ _
t
•
Y
yea
ri
` COMMENTS:
}
Reli iB
Date
Tit
r """ I,
S"g; I
/ 116
Reli
a Ty Received By:
6721�3L
at me
Relinquished B
Date
Q�_J —
Time Received By:
Date Time
y 3
.a
R .. hed F
Date
— Pa-a;.,..d By:
Date Time
mz�
' Y4

0
io ✓
J
.
A
i I
Y rk
6
p. '
1 r �•
7
�t
1
a f
T {
I
a
•
�
r T 4 }i
.
rfr � r.'
SIM
t } ! r
rIV,N
.
t
f i
t
r
rl
r i t}
�rt S r i air h
r
J) 1 {
4di
�
T
t
t
t
l i r
t

Form 1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By: Hydrologic Laboratories, Inc.
Client ID:
Project Number:
Sample ID:
Site / Project ID:
Run ID:
Collection Date:
Received Date:
Report Date:
MT HOLLY NC WWTP
MT. HOLLY NC
L5529-1
BIONOMIC SERVICES
R8064 .
16-AUG-97
19-AUG-97
28-AUG-97
AnaLyte CAS. No DiL. Sample Conc. Units RL
SW846 Method 1311l8240:
Pr.:eparation Date_: 25 AUG'97 -
Analysis Date 25 AUG 97 12 52
Wo�kgroup`Numberz WG1.2266wx
Benzene
71 43-2
1
NO
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
1
NO
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
1
NO
Chloroform
67-66-3
1
NO
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
1
NO
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
1
NO
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
1
ND
Methyl ethyl ketone
78-93-3
1
NO
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
1
NO
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
1
NO
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
1
NO
Dibromofluoromethane
SURROGATE
1
101
Toluene-d8
SURROGATE
1
92
4-Bromofluorobenzene
SURROGATE
1
100
SW846 Method 131:.]%827Q
Preparation DaAUG 97
Analysis Date 27 AUG 97 18 34:
WoEkgroup Number:: WG12273
Cresol
106-44-5
1
NO
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
1
NO
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
1
NO
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
1
NO
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
1
ND
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
1
NO
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
1
NO
Pyridine
110-86-1
1
ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
1
NO
2,4,6-TrichLorophenoL
88-06-2
1
NO
Nitrobenzene-d5
SURROGATE
1
80;
2-FLuorobiphenyl
SURROGATE
1
96
Phenol-d6
SURROGATE
1
97
2-Fluorophenol
SURROGATE
1
81
2,4,6-TribromophenoL
SURROGATE
1
85
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dill Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" Method Report Limit
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L.
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Y
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L.
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
50
50
50
50
100
50
50
250
50
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
500
500
100
100
0

Form
1 - Data Summary Report
' Prepared By:
HydroLogic Laboratories,
Inc.
Client ID:
MT HOLLY .NC WWTP
Project Number:
MT. HOLLY, -NC
Sample ID:
L5529-.1;`
-
Site / Project ID:
BIONOMIC SERVICES
Run ID:
R8064 :`°
Collection Date:
16-AUG=:97
'Received Date:
19-AUG=97
Report Date:
28 AUG-97.
Analyfe' ::.: ;:::;::•.;:;;::
Dt:f:
Sample:Conc r.
Units ::
RL
SW846 Metti:ods 13'11/8080
Preparat�gn Date,
Analysts pate 27 AUG 97.2
woi:k rou G922 61
Lindane
58-89-9 1
NO
ug/L.,
.5
Chlordane
57-74-9 1
ND
ug/L
5
Endrin
72-20-8 1
ND
ug/L:`.
1
Heptachlor
76-44-8 1
-ND'
ug/L`
.5
Methoxychlor
72.43-5 1
ND
ug/L_-
5
Toxaphene
8001-35.2 1
ND
>ug/L'
24
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
SURROGATE 1
64
i.
Decachlorobiphenyl
SURROGATE 1
57
%?
SW846 Methods 131;1/8150
;:,
Freparation Date; 20 AUG97 :<`.::»';
Analysts Date 2i' AUG 97 202 XX
wor kgroup<Number :; NG122b0 _ .......
2,4-D
94-75-7 1
ND
ug/L
10
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
93-72-1 1
ND
ug/L
1
DCAA
SURROGATE 1
66.
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dil" - Sample Dilution Factor
11ND" Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit
1

Form 1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY NC.WWT.P
Project Number:
MT .HOLLY: NC
Sample ID
L5529 1:,.
Site / Project ID
BIONOMIC.'.SERVICES
Run ID:
R8072
Collection Date:
16`AUG-97
Received Date:
19-AUG'97
Report Date:
29-AUG-97
Analyte'
Sample Conc.
:Units
RL
SW846 Methods 13'11/6010-
Preparation Date >::..::.:..
Anaaysis Date 22 AUG 97 1.0
Workgrou Number.;..4tG12247
P:
„.
2
Arsenic
7440-38-2 1
NO
mg/L
Barium
7440-39-3 1
3.79
mg/L".
.02
Cadmium
7440-43-9 1
.00824: `
mg/L:
.005:
Chromium
7440-47-3 1
.0345
mg/L
.01
Lead
7439-92-1 1
ND
:: mg/L:
•1
Selenium
7782-49-2 1
ND
", mg/L.
.1.
Silver
7440-22-4 1
ND
mg/L
.01
S14846 Method 1311/7470
Analysis Date 2.8 AUG 97 15 08
WorkgrouPNumber,;: WG12292,..
'
Mercury 7439-97-6
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dil" - Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit
0

f h rr .r `i t r, r -,, y. r.. '° A h�1 ** sv t r1 Y t l ) r 'i
£.' c . Y "re' �C "j/a '' C -d�"t 'fir "R% z r'vy`�` < �r n s.. 1 r C 1
i q] f i. a�"•:yY.,,r K,r .,-1 SYi 5 v +'r krt r'r�gg T w- {
a" ti f �.. ry i`.2 <s, '�`�,x�5 �i V rr- ', "'i^�.s, ✓0 ,Y,. ]
} 5'' '.', �'"lrF. 2G '��?`rq 4 i71`J S�F�., { 4 1 j L >t r s ` r J f 'r l4
i >, f ! j I - I- - S hfrt, ,�S" �: r r � f ti I
^ J
r f fib 2 l �4 '.r r,. : ! eY ^ t < r C
t rt^3'i `x P f .n.0 ��w Ir Lrri'riXt l�fgZy �+FS it �U tr r. { g V h r r q
€�. S•y .. �' t t ..�� Y Fa ,. k?V' >bf'ra a� f t r. C I _! �t l r r;
rr_ t . r,. sus] r- Eft wry sr� 'L 'h•Z.,� 1 y t } er a'
r r� r y1, . h '1�t Wi 4 q f� "r } f r t / �'
i [J h �'�. rl x - ".. t ff>t{ YY `Ff '#}U 4� '«t•C. 1N , `- t wy r t 6 _� �. - t t'{r5 i ).,
s ; or. f - TQy °3 -r_ C •; .�•' ��•f \ s "�'r' 1 . r. ) _ z; t r �}
A f iY w �� `' S:� T m rr ? i itt ��y ryr I ti u s fir; i � y r r Y-
`' '� 't ' ` - -t+ r�s'�` r-1:%" .�`},4. s ty' t �'' :+, ¢'• { � " e i " - ,.. y . - s � r � 'r
t._,�gg�4, r - .�
is t % "'' r �.! �s4�A'le�x,,-'& -3T i%, ri {rr . r v x,3, ,i�"�#• Natp �aC`� r +t4rr+*. ,, t -tx - i.r : t `L; 'k d + v +
r,r ,' ), �t r '4r ''r , k" F r;, .�,` t�t7 6? r i t Yt t ] zw r t
�' ?' r. n••r - . r i t +' "'`'"a.'.r'S S iP �`�.�`':.Y�r ry �.. r a 'i. i - r I J f `r h> '`
f L i �"� bri) �;i£`� r f !'. y??��,ww�rt _� -.a �.`p ; ./-tilt+ ,'� e � iap.•tl J �s r r ti 4 " r f; i kc ) i r !CS ri
tt+ N�,�� ''_ y,. dJ,l^ o: `F'".,t:Xv+T;i r �?- � ��";� -z'r d i'-. 5+ F w,'I r .r c !, r ,�. a f f 1� t r -rtr d e'r trrfnl -
If y . c . ,.' 3 , =1 s 'x ��+ i K +ti t-tii; 4 � �0 ,{ ; yy,,,�?. C' m S ` t 1 i., -,r ✓ e t _a th ! t Y r { 4 ''i 1.
�, {, a ,� y d '?^�.•' f, d r?3 V L Kr k t] s< J .ew f r. ,; I
t fir lr '' 1 t. .J'�u s 4'i1v a�`+t� t'*a .�"'} c t ti- h t '�` . r - 5 { r
C _:.� f "'-� r r r,l r t ie x t "'` v .. r 4 r t , t; .. t r r`
p -It # .� , ✓jtf.`: WRP i P `: N' ,r i:.A r"ic jS ;e It } 2 ` t4 t' , i- �,�c z a t T .I+ %/ •r
t - x(v 4 i'��s ! ! f'utC (%,cif s' d �,p fr Gr, b..yXaxFf i'� ck l.. p .,r r 'n h r - ^ '(^.. '" y
-..<; ] 1 . "f ) r'i ". �; txh� " t n. `iL�t ,€:+ cr'ni ! a 9r't .n;" ) ,v r e i r . b r °(
C-i.f,yS�a-4 i' T e e % 'u�•..'t :s. T ,q r. F ,1 ir;.,�i,� 'y^,�.,x ... Tru r r t,. r1 n t t 4 ..
.n J a i �, - T �t / X r °' )2y�� aaiy,� i 1 .A. - Y>t i t j r
1 r n dF ( I 6,TJ 3" V '. i.:�f y `f? % t _
i t 4 x s" �k�3i �i r q'") t¢ 1 F ti d 7
c - �.. r. 'k r a ] gx -'}ta i t S �+- mf + z. i f.. .. lr r , c.i• > c.
r♦ K ,r •ir err .x' b."r r r J r yt a ,
P �1S, rY'1� ,r > ryt ttiy`�y.i''1`1iY' '1'''i'Frt+a{ l i - ° 1 r.� s i
y11 dt: 4 t I t i S y l * n r",p�":'tt"q 4 f•�"�SYrly .3 .115, f ] .. t 1: h�_:l ", r ,f.'t { ti
. ix { Iiir) ` y*b�t x �\ ,rf e a6 Ge.,,"y,-.'"' 1` ':;s � _ " -*` ✓
,' i ;Jt'`x.'{r x i . "4 ,t'i'Tar c' w rr'}- r +� ,c°t q j-s ., F ,t y 4 �. t e Q P 't r: Z t e i , / '..S r , ,�t !r f;X
v r 'a 7 t.a Ad�,� x� t,Y�>r'Y:- 'a a 'u* � N � y .{ z, b5 f s i -4 f
�>s4y?,CSC-..I". { a,a x .i t r t\ t r �.
.f } r," Y `vim i�r'?'A , s '�i5 Rr . ,f'�., si t S f a 1 - • r C,
rr G� i I W �: ';� r 1"'- ir-I -tN .,&3' ' �d aw ti'� ]g�'• t t -.I fl xia f" k 1 ti t -i t r
r3. • i r y ? t ,} y s, { � ^ s LSt� rP` Y2� d'(� �r �%ry," Xs, iF .j_ y� 1 f. + a. { :, t k r r, i i t I ' ; tl ,?
tr .rV' a , -{,• '..s r y'�¢, -rty >PL, 1 �' •�- , r r n r
} tl e` r" � a } %yl5M �' ,2 jr.,rt'' ".i' }`<° vJ:Afr, t1♦ r"• 1 ' ' s 4 :r Y r �.r r Z
spa r 6 kq {,yy, w r;i <Y.s f y f
x J wa f l %t { .4€., Ssrh� ' t �* Xv :r` k" s.,^' r 1 , r . x- . K t ; . { - ' `°
4�{t J > xv'Frivwsa$Snyc,'M,'l� j I�r z sl, _ rA - r
r, /rr fk r rjc�� ,y�?'� ,'� .ui .."p}'�'tsk�"t>` `sf - t .s_a
r�, r : `( y1 ra' �'ris,'4 ez"'" tid I ` s tS �. ,g).� _ , A S . s` s �� '' - ( r .
{ c� �. c z ta. rra ,` � i��n,,? '%X,= t' t,�. r *.Ao _ •7-
s: i t*> r , 3 m Ems, A r
�h �.: ,p ' q, .t- ,'^y}'iti,A a'• J� `e r.�,, ,y, �-. ytrk .1 - .r Sr t t r i rt 1
rj r ! � Yr �,,-y a .pq ly At 'x s �: -:
d . `}]. ntr< t `f��J`x� 'diq°,''V�'Y(, ,`. �d� 2\ '" ^ 'ry'l �G.�Kr F `�.a+, t tf rt 0. '.. t 5 t /: i I 1
e X. 4 ! ,,:r: t{ .1, t ,sc st r ^i f i"'" ",��-� r � �. i ;
i VFy 'i a ,ft' i.Y , .,`r % r p Y:J'ig4 { � 7 t e ] _ r ) sfi 1 lr'
r ♦ g r 1 i� t^F yak ��''', w_ ,- 4v, , S , �i
-�ti c r 4i4 1 - , r,e 1 tt .+ ,', . t fp +X .. t
t ter,' 4A' t 3 w F °5YA ��'tiaY P 7rfi' k l' r 1.
5 ,.;�-�. '' M yt�`�,ls � 1' 7 >f v h "C'' s"�„`�'r Z" rw. t 4 5� : ' y 1
P� 6
c r 1 t <`Yr` z f t�i��l:ua a 3n rw','�x �`�y`�t?arc���� �� `#j'1r w, T I t4' r< , t I i.
r!- `/ `S l .r �i`y, r'-Ytisi' it`1�.Akf'"r''-y;x�✓q,4 'F' y ,ai,J, Y r '' q ? > a. 17 �{ s. s is/ :4;
p. [ r t t Ste'? `t N, t ,a`' •y�'",,,� ,i{,� 3 yro '+ - 4 r. < r 1;
I , i . h r 'J ? „ .Cr . '` l irei _ Y:Yi ' g " .+• y. as .ir ° I -. s �' t >
r 7
.L .rZ T �? t r. i t t).R,e.. 3 a rdlST c s ,. I K
r:.: tj is vw_W' ;cf at a £t 1 'T''s d lc as K,". / d.J -. �f
,a y r t 't >_ ��"tyy.{lsr--T siit ,?+' Y.tr ` �s1i �; �.r r I..
e ;y EY s: , r � r't 4� + e , ! '"hll.�p,-�'r�, �fi ,, •4x �Y �,
4,, r t y. r r err Y ,4 Y a /A"�� T(`/ �TF t,
/ ✓ t u 7 Y t. .. -.� } u'+o; Src s, ; ra. tvYa,°t'�'ry'�4 rj,, 4 . q S .i } i�i O.L� `V J� ¢s r j r
Q"ri art C,` f ,✓ q :�s,:O..,-QJ'y#.��,' f.} b.S...At�e'�k C�j•+Ysrnni{T`r i ' _?- r. f I
".d t r� A}' t§'� r , a� t i to > [ r r
��.. t _ / +,r Lt! fy, "', cep ,,h�ty`r.� es -T�ts� t�'-"� �. - " " ` ♦ d .;:
1 �,,a f. - t ti "-sr e S �K' r a ." 4 S,l� -4�}te a yt,-, s is i s ��. , _ d '
I F- 'f r r 4 .F Ti �'"ir r� f� t�4 Ru' < y t ` - f r-'
f 1 4 it d 'n %jai' . f , 'x .i t ] \ Y.
&ix f 2� - .a h'7i 7 2h' rp S C a n J.
I! ,t '- tns r yr .. , 'ff - ' - u�' 1q. } t - f f t 1
andr'r!r t J "SJ H dye 'tlr. t}Z•.,,;&� N� v+ a y ,, R -
1 . `'� Ni,<.J* � •r t t y rLJ. uY,Sf 4 e ti i 11 S , �� G�"§�3a��,t ��'� r K, �� s A q a . - ,r nhy ✓
Y ys„ 301 — ''✓-'CF i s: a� `Y „wy� 'j +'r .7 (. 7r �Y, r' / f r i ✓ t ,
i .� K l LS f,� .�sitr - >k ry J t r+ l y
L }l a+Jrs9r`) Y k yxyC"?.�'�. SVu ♦F•`¢'L'P�"]tlUrsl�s F.,�..."^e-.,"n ..C. L !' ?t� '�r ` r ✓ }:
4'2,g7 r G''`Y�{s ,}i .r„ rijlla r`s5"t y M1F -l�- Y4S sr*'- Fx ra_ i r'' ."i 1 N•
!r. -' ayy'" y4 L.. ,' ", Y.,'y�.� &{tx�, s 3 ¢ < s �,r!{" �} .-«, `+t -a l rY "+ { I I
J'}„t"'}J I > D` 1. rP�r. yy, >+ux� , t �•
>7` 4 • c `x'Ni „b? <9 r 1 r""' �.p { £ (N y' ' •'e�rN h T a a r �. µ I i ) r I-
fi hb , F �' f of-,r'• i i tr�.o- ""r�A �} •2Y" >s ,gp...'�iy ,. $ r, t - ,� t # 'r s t 4i,
.7� 1 ,r . �,t a *'C' �j a rC;' 7, - f ,E 1 K s
r AL� ��°rr s yy 9 2 t s,.�yam x�r� TS.{.Cyr.�,�a�i: �ti' r .FY'P76ay s'�;,t r f.. t� j 1 1 s _-
a Yii" 4 �i , r''__ .f t:' .. �a ":T try r.ss� $4 'i., `�`Y'�, C ti i v I ' r r / t.r '� ,
1, 'tf* , ,t f;„ r A , i -r rjt'`r�', -' f1 �r- } ,�i ,�,t t ' apt- ! t F r i r ,� t �, " ; fbyf
✓ !L Y '' 'it'1d'g'�� a.. 1 Q -.,,, * i, r ! _a x s !f" �- l..t !-
�-'• -'] ;< ir! i�f ,Zc't` t' g__00 �s; - vr'" f .9'' r�i i s 1 i{ S 't,r t _ - '� P '�
t s, r 8 ' 1 I jr"` •t;,°Y2. ` A 3' R d'ar'�. ,r4 r' x 1, , r r 'r .F > r +` ..
z `� v, 1 ca�"!Y,`�r' v F #' , yii�" 4 v ) J :4
3 ;,�"' r,� w,,�9 'ri'-Fdi7'A1.5 ,fi `tr i' w7' dl "n ,��7 i+• ? 5: ';:A: r r
} ` F't'�tli� �11.�? jd'�"�.,�7w i i'irr�,✓ {{ 5r�><Es J ! +r � H
} �.:1 �ii f i 1 An1K�9,"r}"a"a ado.S' '14 "G:'S°$�..7 f� 1 S r rr4�J ti - r
aak �' -f 4 S r x+' a �« f�''rr m's's '�^`ra..p t,,,, ' r +
�y +, {ar�p,. ,� 4 . is73c rr •t
I KxFrr ..:, +rr ; , s:x ,J,� w. j .,.' i r ! r
-t tM�>d } t. t 7 t+r iyy �v+. hu f'�, �^Z" ...'�'aK�''�tz •'", lc ;, 11 � 3 r s'
L � �rj s rf 1 .,4t11 t� � y i t. '' �W. w "is ', a y _. yJ t r .
f.�., r+ "��p. /> �t� `r+i�4 t. $!.�nls yL *"-i ".:ti -.� .q u. ;:G r,n Y, b`r 'i �, r / i, tt.
Y" "3p. 3, ,y thy,.
kr ._. �' •c rr 14_t },�� ^`'� ' :.3p+7 'x '� ^ r'i�{tt, ' F��M S �R,.' to �. r �. .%; _" f� t '.�2 1 - �..j
r-r¢ Ciat, iY{cr f ? j.'i ,U a .4 4.A° hvn t ,y-,�� :� X'r -3t r"✓`-I� i �`1 ,l ✓ ��
'1`a kL r 4 r af+,srt r$ �a,w �,sfS{�,-�t�7'.2 i..2,.t a'. S "a 1 r i. p r t 3 s f, r t-:
r .rvx + to a / 0 f '+'a: f , ,ae• �.y,.,; a �::,.:�r�i�l�.�, t .Y t !I - ' t . 1 j
r 1 13 i.� y�y J OF ;j ,�n { . �"a i. 1.k-'k t r f 1
t4,1. } Xr•%t hi #*"�.a�.tVl,,-iq 1,!' yg� �. a+f" � eC-, ,?r µl`�y-%°- i�.T { ja r r j..:. `r
i - rii g z� }, € w m rn t
t " � !4%,�ti i- It r �` '.. t�,� { ' t` C� H C� C % 1 R ,1l _
_ Ja Tr`�• ! J 4i 14:E��•c'�. rr'�rif 'd , aytCr1K }+ drdx l� 'sf sP)t _ - ..I
�i
5 ��r f� _ ) fG ✓s]3 f ti:,./s!` err ���•��'Rs' t `ar,,s rti.f �T'.l" r a :.-
1 r.,7< . 1' t .°' ,a7 ;`I.'s' • r u F N t _ .y . .
_ , I � i dr.r. i i 1 ,2 7 21' . af.G r. Ydr,,. „s 1 y .s
Aft A t r''!,' �t.�-:(. t . ,
r

Form 1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By: Hydrologic Laboratories, Inc.
Client ID:
Method Blank
Project Number:
Not :Reported
Sample ID:
uG12266-1
Site / Project ID:
Not Reported
Run ID:
R8027
Collection Date:
Not Reported ..
Received Date:
26-AUG-97
Report Date:
26, AUG-97
AnaLyte
Oi
Sample.Conc. ;.
Units::::
RL
SW846 Method 131:1/8240
Preparation Date; 25 AUG 97
Analysis;
Workgroup.'Number ...4►G12266
Benzene
71-43-2 1
ND
ug/L
50
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5 1
NO
ug/L
50
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7 1
NO
- ug/L
50
Chloroform
67-66-3 1
ND
:ug/L
50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7 1
ND
ug/L.
100
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2 1
ND
.ug/L.
50
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4 1
ND
"'ug/C.
50
Methyl ethyl ketone
78-93-3 1
ND
:Ug/L
250
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4 1
NO
: ug/L
50
Trichloroethene
79-01-6 1
NO
ug/L
50
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4 1
NO
ug/L
100
Dibromofluoromethane
SURROGATE 1
95
Toluene-d8
SURROGATE 1
91
%
4-Bromofluorobenzene
SURROGATE 1
97
%
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dill' - Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit
a

Form 1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Client ID: Method Blank
Project Number: Not Reported
Sample ID: W612238-1.
Site / Project ID: Not Reported
Run ID: R8027,
Collection Date: Not Reported
Received Date: 21-AUG-97
Report Date: 21-AUG-97
AnaLyte
CAS No `:
Di
Sample Conc.
Units
RL
SW846 Method 1317%8240
Preparation Date 20 AUG 97
Analysis. Date","20 AUG 9.7 11 31
Norkgroup'Number .:..:. '.: .:..:
........
.."WG12238
Benzene
71-43-2
1
ND
ug/L
50
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
1
ND
ug/L
50
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
1
ND
ug/C
50
Chloroform
67-66-3
1
ND
ug/L;<
50 "
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
1
ND
ug/L.
100
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
1
ND
ug/L
50
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
1
ND
ug/L
50
Methyl ethyl ketone
78-93-3
1
ND
ug/L
250
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
1
ND
uj/L
50
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
1
ND
ug/L
50
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
1
ND
ugZL
100
Dibromofluoromethane
SURROGATE
1
99
Toluene-d8
SURROGATE
1
102
4-Bromofluorobenzene
SURROGATE
1
99
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dill Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit

■
Laboratory Control Spike / Laboratory Control Spike Duplicate QC Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Sample Id: /usr/users/seed2/target/A7653
Work Group Id: WG12238-2
Run Id: R8027
GALP Record Id: Not Reported
Preparation Date: 20-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 20-AUG-97
Report Date: 25-AUG-97
Analyte CAS No Low Limit High Limit RPD Limit LCS Add LCSD Add Units LCS %REC LCSD %REC LCS/LCSD RPD QUAL (1)
SW846 Method 1311/8240
Preparation Date: 20-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 20-AUG-97 12:57
Workgroup Number: WG12238
Benzene
71-43-2
76
127
13
50
50
ug/L
90
94
4 ---
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
75
130
13
50
50
ug/L
92
92
0 ---
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
61
145
14
50
50
ug/L
88
90
2 ---
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
62
137
24
50
50
ug/L
86
88
2 ---
Note:
Technical Review By: Rose Murphy
Note:
Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
(1) QUAL - * = LCS Outside Control Limits; # = LCSD Outside Control Limits; a = RPD Outside Control Limits; '-' = Value Within Control Limits
"Limits" - The "Limits" reported above (Low, High and RPD) are in units of percent M .
"LCS,SD Add" - The conc. of analyte added to the LCS or LCSD sample.
"LCS %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Percent Recovery
"LCSD %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Percent Recovery
"LCS/LCSD RPD" - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Relative Percent Difference
NR - Not Reported

Form
1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By:
HydroLogic Laboratories,
Inc.
Client ID:
Method Blank
Project Number:
Not Reported
Sample ID:
WG12273-1
Site / Project ID:
Not Reported
Run ID:
R8060
'Collection Date:
Not Reported
Received Date:
25-AUG-97
Report Date:
28-AUG-97
Ana lyte
::CAS
Sample Conc..
Units
RL
SW846 Method 1311/827Q
Preparation Date: 25 AUG 97
Analysis Date 27 AUG 9.7 17 03
Work'group%Number,.,WG12273.
Cresol
106-44-5
ND
ug/L
100
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2 1
ND
ug/L
100
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1 1
ND
ug/L
100
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3 1
ND
„ug/L
100
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1 1
ND
ug/L'
100
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3, 1
ND
:ug/L
100
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5 1
NO
ug/L
500
Pyridine
110-86-1 1
ND
ug/L
500
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4 1
ND.
ug/L.
100
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2 1
ND
ug/L
100
Nitrobenzene-d5
SURROGATE 1
86
%
2-Fluorobiphenyl
SURROGATE 1
96
Phenol-d6
SURROGATE 1
89
2-Fluorophenol
SURROGATE 1
80
y
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
SURROGATE 1
72
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dil" - Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit
E

M
Single Laboratory Control Spike QC Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Sample Id: /usr/users/seed2/target/C2714
Work Group Id: WG12273-2
Run Id: R8060
GALP Record Id: Not Reported
Preparation Date: 25-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 27-AUG-97
Report Date: 28-AUG-97
Analyte CAS No Sample Value Units Spike Cone. Low Limit High Limit SLCS %REC QUAL (1)
SW846 Method 1311/8270
Preparation Date: 25-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 27-AUG-97 17:48
Workgroup Number: WG12273
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2
Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5
Note:
Technical Review By: Rose Murphy
400 ug/L 500 39 96 80
610 ug/L 500 14 103 122
(1) QUAL - * = LCS Outside Control Limits; '-' = Value Within Control Limits
"Limits" - The "Limits" reported above (Low and High) are in units of percent M .
"LCS Add" - The conc. of analyte added to the SLCS sample.
"SLCS %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Percent Recovery
NR - Not Reported
Note:
Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala

Form
1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By:
HydroLogic Laboratories,
Inc.
Client ID:
Method Blank
Project Number:
Not Reported
Sample ID:
WG12261-1
Site / Project ID:
Not Reported
Run ID:
R8064
Collection Date:
Not Reported
Received Date:
22-AUG-97
Report Date:
28-AUG=97
Sample Conc.:,::
"Units :
RL
SW846 Methods 1311/808Q
Preparation Date: 25 AUG 9i :<:;::.•.:.
,.
Analysis<Date 27 AUG 97 20 00.
Workgrou 'Number..; WG12261
P"
_
.
Lindane
58-89-9 1
ND
ug/L
.5
Chlordane
57-74-9 1
ND
u9/L
5
Endrin
72-20-8 1
NO
ug/L
1
Heptachlor
76-44-8 1
ND
-ug/L
.5
Methoxychlor
72-43-5 1
NO
.: ug/L.
5
Toxaphene
8001-35=2 1
ND
ug/L
24
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
SURROGATE 1
73
%
Decachlorobiphenyl
SURROGATE 1
77
i
Review By: Rose Murphy
Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dil" - Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit
2

Laboratory Control Spike / Laboratory Control Spike Duplicate OC Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Sample Id: LCS/LCSD Pair
Work Group Id:. WG12261-2
Run Id: R8064
GALP Record Id: Not Reported
Preparation Date: 25-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 27-AUG-97
Report Date: 28-AUG-97
Analyte CAS No Low Limit High Limit RPD Limit LCS Add LCSD Add Units LCS %REC LCSD %REC LCS/LCSD RPD QUAL (1)
SW846 Methods 1311/8080
Preparation Date: 25-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 27-AUG-97 18:42
Workgroup Number: WG12261
Lindane 58-89-9 56 123 ...15 2 2 ug/L 83 84 1 ---
Endrin 72-20-8 56 121 21 5 5 ug/L 100 103 3 ---
Heptachlor 76-44-8 40 131 20 2 2 ug/L 89 92 3 ---
Note:
Technical Review By: Rose Murphy
Note:
Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
0 ) QUAL - * = LCS Outside Control Limits; # = LCSD Outside Control Limits; a = RPD Outside Control Limits; '-' = Value Within Control Limits
"Limits" - The "Limits" reported above (Low, High and RPD) are in units of percent M .
"LCS,SD Add" - The conc. of anaLyte added to the LCS or LCSD sample.
"LCS XREC" - Laboratory Control Sample Percent Recovery
"LCSD %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Percent Recovery
"LCS/LCSD RPD" - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Relative Percent Difference
NR - Not Reported

Form 1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Client ID:
Method Blank
Project Number:
Not -Reported:
Sample ID:
WG12260-1
Site / Project ID:
Not: Reported
Run ID:
R8063
Collection Date:
Not. Reported
Received Date:
22-AUG-97
Report Date:
28-AUG=97
-
Analyte.
....: CA5 No :;i; D� L,
:;: Sample Conc `<
llnias RL
SG846 Mett'ods 131i/815. »' '
>%
Preparation Date 20-AUG 97
AnBlysis;D:ate 27 AUG 97 16 t3:...,.:.::•
:::..
Workgroup Number :.. wG122b0 '::<......
.. .
`.. .... ..........................
2,4-D
94-75-7 1
- NO
ug/L 10
2,4,5-TP (SiLvex)
93-72-1 1
ND
-ug%L 1
DCAA
SURROGATE 1
87
%_
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen KuoppaLa
"Dil" - Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit
M

0
Laboratory Control Spike / Laboratory Control Spike Duplicate QC Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Sample Id: LCS/LCSD Pair
Work Group Id: WG12260-2
Run Id: R8063
GALP Record Id: Not Reported
Preparation Date: 20-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 27-AUG-97
Report Date: 28-AUG-97
Analyte CAS No Lou Limit High Limit RPD Limit LCS Add LCSD Add Units LCS VREC LCSD %REC LCS/LCSD RPD QUAL (1)_
SW846 Methods 1311/8150
Preparation Date: 20-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 27-AUG-97 16:50
Workgroup Number: WG12260
2,4-D 94-75-7 40
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 40
Note:
Technical Review By: Rose Murphy
160 25 20 20 ug/L 65 67 3 ---
160 25 2 2 ug/L 80 79 1 ---
Note:
Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
(1) QUAL - * = LCS Outside Control Limits; # = LCSD Outside Control Limits; a = RPD Outside Control Limits; '-' = Value Within Control Limits
"Limits" - The "Limits" reported above (Low, High and RPD) are in units of percent M .
"LCS,SD Add" - The conc. of analyte added to the LCS or LCSD sample.
"LCS %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Percent Recovery
"LCSD %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Percent Recovery
"LCS/LCSD RPD" - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Relative Percent Difference
NR - Not Reported

Form
1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By:
HydroLogic Laboratories,
Inc.
Client ID:
Method Blank
Project Number:
Not Reported
Sample ID:
WG12247-1
Site / Project ID:
Not Reported
Run ID:
R8040
Collection Date:
Not Reported .
Received Date:
20-AUG-97
Report Date:
22-AUG-97
Analyte.
CAS No :;; . Di l; ;
'c Sample Conc. ;'
:`:Units:
RL
46 Methods 131? 9010;":.:;:>;<•::,.>'><,..;:::<;>:>::;::::;:::»>::>
a r atio Date:: 20..:AUG_97 :::<:i:;:::>:::>::;`::::::::
Frep �
<:>:«::•
;:
Analysis:Date
uo�.kgroupiNumber:.FiG1.2., :::..
Arsenic
7440-38-2 1
ND
mg/L
.2
Barium
7440-39-3 1
NO
mg/L
.02
Cadmium
7440-43-9 1
NO
Img7C
005
Chromium
7440-47-3 1
ND.;
mg/L
.01
Lead
7439-92-1 1
ND
mg%L
1
Selenium
7782-49-2 1
.118
Silver
7440-22-4 1
NO
mg/L
01
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dil" - Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" Method Report Limit
E

■
Laboratory Control Spike / Laboratory Control Spike Duplicate QC Report
Prepared By: HydroLogic Laboratories, Inc.
Sample Id: /usr/users/seed2/pe3000/97082lr3
Work Group Id: WG12247-2
Run Id: R8040
GALP Record Id: Not Reported
Preparation Date: 20-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 22-AUG-97
Report Date: 22-AUG-97
Analyte
CAS No
Low Limit
High Limit
RPD Limit
LCS Add
LCSD Add
Units
LCS %REC
LCSD %REC
LCS/LCSD RPD QUAL (1)
SW846 Methods 1311/6010
Preparation Date: 20-AUG-97
Analysis Date: 22-AUG-97 09:37
Workgroup Number: WG12247
Arsenic
7440-38-2
80
120
20
2
2
mg/L
105
102
3 ---
Barium
7440-39-3
80
120
20
2
2
mg/L
100
100
0 ---
Cadmium
7440-43-9
80
120
20
.05
.05
mg/L
102
100
2 ---
Chromium
7440-47-3
80
120
20
.2
.2
mg/L
105
105
0 ---
Lead
7439-92-1
80
120
20
.5
.5
mg/L
102
102
0 ---
Selenium
7782-49-2
80
120
20
2
2
mg/L
103
97
6 ---
Silver
7440-22-4
80
120
20
.05
.05
mg/L
84
84
0 ---
Note: Note:
Technical Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
(1) QUAL - * = LCS Outside Control Limits; # = LCSD Outside Control Limits; is = RPD Outside Control Limits; '-' = Value Within Control Limits
"Limits" - The "Limits" reported above (Low, High and RPD) are in units of percent (%).
"LCS,SD Add" - The conc. of analyte added to the LCS or LCSD sample.
"LCS %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Percent Recovery
"LCSD %REC" - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Percent Recovery
"LCS/LCSD RPD" - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate Relative Percent Difference
NR - Not Reported

Form 1 - Data Summary Report
Prepared By: Hydrologic Laboratories, Inc.
Analyte CAS No ; Dil Sample Conc.. Units RL
SW846 Method 1311/7470
And Lys is`:Date 28 AUG 97 14 56:
Workgroup Number WG12292
Mercury 7439-97-6 1 ND mg/L .0002
Review By: Rose Murphy Report Approved By: Karen Kuoppala
"Dill' - Sample Dilution Factor
"ND" - Sample Concentration Not Detected above RL
"RL" - Method Report Limit

REPORT NUMBER
R241-031
- C_
A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
Fax No. [phone] r"103 f IV
SEND
TO: EIO-NOMIC SERVICES INC lob"
1-0
516 ROUNDTREE RD CP
CHARLOTTE NC, 28217
DATE OF REPORT C9/02/97 . PAGE I
GROWER: CHARLIE M KILLSAN
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES ACCT # 46058
SUBMITTED
BY: 810-NOMIC SERVICES INC
DATE RECEIVED 08/28/97
DATE OF ANALYSIS 08/29/97
ORGANIC- �
PHOSPHORUS.
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
PH':
Cation
PERCENT
SAMPLE
LABOIL.
MATTER
-
PI
.132
K
Mg
Ca
NaNa'
BUFFER
HYDRO,
Exchange
--BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
%
%
NUMBER
NUMBER
, . . -
: (weak Bray)
(strong Bray)
­GEN
H
Capacity -
C.E.C..
RATE 'Ibs./A
ppm-P RATE
.:`,ppm-P RATE
ppm-K RATE
ppm-Mg RATE
ppm-Ca RATE
ppm-Na RATE
pH
-.'.pH.
meq/100g,
rneq/1 006
K
Mg
Ca
H
Na
1
20865-5.8
140V
27 H
42 M
84 L
81 L
1570 VH
21 VL
6.8
C.3
9.1 '
2.4
7.4
36.3
2.9
1.0
2
20866.13.0
101M
- 9 L
17 L
'92 K
120 VH
84C H
23 VL
6.3
.6.9
0.7
6.2
3.8
16.2
67.9
10.6
1.6
3
U867,1
.6 76M
2 VL
4 VL
99 V11
158 VH
300 L
27 VL
5.7
-6.8
0.9
4.0
6.3
32.6
37.1
21.1
2.9
4
20868-5.9
140VII
78 VH-139
VIH
147 H
99 L
1800 VH
91 L
7.6
0.0
10.6
3.6
-7.8
54.9.
0.0
3.7
I M Q;v ZPAQ W-11 k, F-I I M 0 Rol LISM-14" a]
'M
-INITRATE5",�*
OPPER,g�
�,NUMBER`
Cu
IB& �
V
P
;: �4
0'
M
�A
lzx
ppm-Cu RATE
pprn-B RATE
RATE
SAND + .SILT,URE
J.i:T
-CLAY,
7�
1
13 :H
15. 113; VK
49 W
29 H,
-4.3:Vi:0.8
?11
0. 4'VL
.2
65 015.
0 VH
:'24 H
20 H
3.4 V
4 0.6 M
0.3 VL
.88 VH
9. 8 VH
E L
12 H
2.5 H
0.6 M
3 VL
This o applies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retaine&a
L
t i y days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
'4
15 H
62. 0 VH
Be VH
51 Vill
l Vi
1.0 M
0.7 L
X�A - - -
.0
ao
EA N AGRICULTUR ABORAT IES, INC.
... .........
..
by C. NORMAN J
- - - - � - -11 - - - - 1­ - - . . . '. .,. . .... ... ......... 1-11 I'll - nc­­ - PP111 07 4.P CU %.,VNVMM1 1U LtJZ). Vth A ht V U
ENR - ESTIMATED NITROGEN RELEASE ..... MI H TIPI Y TWr RP:ql 11 Tq IN - QV 9 A Tn PnMIMMT Tn 1 DC DCD V2n5

A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • 'Richmond, ;Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
R241-031
REPORT NUMBER
ACCT # 46058
8IO-NOMIC SERVICES INC CHARLIE M KILLSAN BID-NOMIC SERVICES INC
516 ROUND TREE R D
CHARLOTTE: NC 28217
DATE RECEIVED 08/28/97
09/02/97 1 DATE OF ANALYSIS 08/29/97
4 ZC868 C.E.C. MAY -BE OVER ESTIMATED DUE TO EXCESSIVE LIMEo, HIGH CA
Cc¢�j
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. Copyright 1977

IEPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R122-033 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] mlatf
Fax No. [phone]
SEND EIO-NOFiIC SERVICES.- INC.
TO: 516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE NC 2€217
DATE OF REPORT 05 / 05/ 97 PAGE 1
GARY NEAL ALLEN
GROWER:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ACCT # 45671
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED BIO-NOMIC SERVICESe INC.
BY:
DATE RECEIVED 05/01/97
DATE OF ANALYSIS 05/02/97
SAMPLE
LAB
ORGANIC , ,.
MATTER
PHOSPHORUS -
POTASSIUM
';MAGNESIUM '
.'CALCIUM`
SODIUM _'-
pH
HYDRO-
Ca4ion
Exchange
CC
PERCENT'
(COMPUTED)
AS U
B E SATURATION, P
:' PT'"
(Weak Bray)
P2 ;,;
(Strop Bray)
K '
k
Mg
= Ca
Na
SOIL .
BUFFER
NUMBER
NUMBER
EN .
R.
.:. „ .:
::q..
E C�
.%
K Na ?
RATE = • lbs.%A`
ppm-P RATE'
ppm-P RATE
ppm-K RATE
ppm-Mg RATE
ppm-Ca RATE
ppm-Na RATE .
PH
pH `:.
meq/100g
meq/100g
1
04421
3.5 111H
12 L
27 M
:8F M
177 VH
890 H
10 VL
7.0
0.0
6.2
3.6
23.8
71.8
0.0
0.7
2
34422.3.9
121H
9 L
17 L
67 K
127 VH
650 M
9 VL
6.3
6.9
0.5
5.1
3.4
20.9
54.3
10.6
0.8
r
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
i,:
�•.." t
,.a, ...
yr-..... 1. �.
-y e..u..�..
•........ , • '4 A,
i. ...-r . �$ rl
--,�>a,�,h , . y
- .. '
3�1x.. <,..
,. , .-�,
1.
-.1�?. er. dd
r ..r'Ki.
s. , :, . _
4,.✓• -:.
1rti .i.,,..�v.>..
•.:�,,,_ .
a.
.. '°r-t1 iY.
,,, �-
u, s0• t
rc.4e,. L^ �.. �i
i. CP- ,.
-y •,"
,* '�
_.. _.
::.
,• IN �a.}> PART1CLl�SRE��
yti
1-•:1-.�
S{ s,
RRATE�,.
,.. .,:..�.
;��SULFUR �
!. ..
:.'i'' ZIr�'G.�.a,r..,
-. '! ; ...
M NGANESE
� ,�-,1RONF,.
r..
,�:
'a"t:,
;'i
i+. r,.}.
. � a
`t. �. ;-p.
wt.
rl
�. .ova,.
+
:asw.
a `,t
�-f 2�:
,. �
� `�::.
el'3_. 'C i... :'..
YJ'v. �-.'v'".%,i'Rty i}. yl '� � �'ri..-', :d.. zK.. y,
��t ,.� t„ 3�x {,.
�. {� py 1t,,� .h sA'
AMPLE.......
.�. ....:..NO
-. ,.
,... rt•. ._'x ....
...... P•. ..
k.Y
.. _....s..
3-
s`x.. -. .,
1 ...
,, ,S � ;
�' ...,... .
�.-• fl.
, -• ,:._'�..� <
v, n. .�e .M'n.:
, _ , , Zn .,,.. "
� .. .......
;1_...(;
>..' ..;. ,..v
.. ,P,r,
t� ,�Mn,.,
_. 1n..
ei S.
�..{ ,.. ,. p.,
.. .^�. x:. .,.x .l
Fe. �
i• ....,wpLL.
.d.,a>1'N.
...
...v... t,.
C�i t :,s
.. ,., , 1.,
<e:» J.....
.. C
1pp��_.r B ,..
,x .�..
+Ni- (+.. � � ...
y
�.,
. ,. a.�
UME
_.,wK.
i ,•;SALTS •.,F V
. • :a..
.C':. {...�3
�C r �+,
.:,Na .:}
� h.._
Y. S,"^C
'�. Mo..:��
"Ed
-•
..,c,., .., -,.
(.. ,.
PP a ..
,
i1 ,
x
.t .'. F'... ..
,. ...
. .-
.. r .,r.•?. _..K
v�...
..
�. r .. _.a
�
,.K_..4! ,k ...
., -.:.. l.. a .,
S '^�
.�
TE
•7 �-:, i.
.:..' 1
i ._,w .� h
-,,`.. ,.
,.,:� c. ,.,
e. ,• ,.
-:. 1 >t`�.
:,.r
,a PP irt'N�o„
xt%r
-:ky. �.,,.5.
s. ..t
� o:: ,
°l, t
r'.
a
a�. iY
� ova
°J �.:
,4,
.Y. a.
2r ?.", rf,,.-•'- ) t.. -.4...
.�_. .SOIL
, Y " a.`
�t.. < -rtr z" s
� r
..
�^ AATE ,.;
. ,.,.
: -S RATE
, . ,.--t.. -�; -,.-,
�� m• : TE
,,,. ..'S;
'�" la-M RATE
•,.- _ : if
" rn-Fe RATE:=
y- ., ...?"i� •:ayr[
.) m-Cu RA ;r:•
PP.. �
„�•
.o.- m, .''. ,-
z,,,. m� AATE '
„}ln
:�.:`^�r
'x n
�.,:•-
mmhoskm RATE
.:. s
m-CI RATE<
.r
�, .RATE':
SAND
r Sl,
pjrya -
� �°"-nth �EXTUR
ai�'-. ,'
•. ,..` .rn :. ._
x: i:'.->•,
-"�-.'.r ... 4. ... :.<.
,,:.. .; 1.
•
'}Y
: , c
C
, ,PP.. ,
1ant:. �
,a
1. ,w
Y. t..
.PP
•`F��t' w � t
..a,.:
'f;.)a<,
Y �;L,-
1 r°k=}•:..r�!+ �-�',1'.+.&,s�" ,l.
1
11 -N7
6.6 H
54 Vi
24 H
2.3 H
0.7 M
<.3 VL
2
12 M
4.3 H
42 H
24 H
1.9 H
0.7 M
<.3 VL
This repo pplies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
maximu of thirty days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
A & AS E AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
by
Ia
CODE TO RATING: VERY LOW (VL), LOW (L), MEDIUM (M), HIGH (H), VERY HIGH (VH), AND NONE (N). "" MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 4.6 TO CONVERT TO LES. PER ACRE P205

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Attach this form to the corresponding laboratory analysis.
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form.
Permit Number
Facility Name
NPDES #
or WO I (resldual only facllltles)
WWTP Name
Residual Analysis Data
Date Sampled (grab) or
Date Com osited
Percent Solids
" SEE ATTACHED "
Laboratory 1 )
2)
3)
i,
I...........
ysiem
,11 certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance Win a s
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the Information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false Information, including the possibility of fines and Imprisonment for knowing violations."
DEM FORM SSF (10/94)

t
.
i

,TAN- 1 5-98 THU 2 1 : 05 B I O-NOM I.0 SERV ICES , I NC . R. 1 2
PROJECT; MT HOLLY, NC
A&L LABS
LAS DATE: 5/20/97
LAB #42532
LAB DATE:
LAB #
PARAMETER
MG/KG
LBS/DT
MG/KG
LBS/DT
SOLIDS $
2.02
NITROGEN (TKN) M..,
57900
115.8000
0.0000
PHOSPHORUS
15800
31.6000
0.0000
POTASSIUM
2600
5.2000
0.0000
SULFUR
14300
28.6000
0.0000
CALCIUM
19900
39.8000
0.0000
MAGNESIUM
2500
5.0000
0.0000
SODIUM
8000
16.0000
0.0000
IRON
9380
18.7600
0.0000
ALUMINUM
13100
26.2000
0.0000
MANGANESE
273
0.5460
0.0000
COPPER
412
0.8240
0.0000
ZINC
1180
2.3600
0.0000
AMMONIA NITROGEN
7900
15.8000
0.0000
NO3-NO2 NITROGEN
-
0.0000
0.0000
CADMIUM
4.0
0.0080
0.0000
CHROMIUM
1190
2.3800
0.0000
NICKEL
202
0,4040
0.0000
LEAD
64
0.1280
0.0000
ARSENIC
1.63
0.0033
0.0000
MERCURY
3.46
0.0069
0.0000
SELENIUM
1.65
0.0033
0.0000
PH
7.6
CALCIUM CARBONATE
59200
118.4000
0.0000
VOLITILE SOLIDS
714500
1,429.0000
0.0000
ORGANIC NITROGEN
50000
100.0000
0.0000
PAN (SURFACE) f=.3
37.9000
0.0000
PAN (SUBSUR) #=.3
45.8000
0.0000
■

T H U 2 1: 0 5 B I O- N O M I C SERVICES, INC P o 1 3
PROJECT: MT HOLLY, NC
A&L LABS
LAB DATE: 5/20/97
LAB # 42532
LAB DATE:
LAB #
PARAMETER
MG/KG
LBS/DT
MG/KG
LBS/DT
P205
72.5252
0.0000
K20
6.2639
0.0000
PAN: PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
SURFACE: SURFACE APPLICATION
SUBSUR: SUBSURFACE APPLICATION (INJECTION OR INCORPORATED
:ANALXSIS.CHT
MR-ANALY,M97
■

■
'.r

.T A N- 1 5- 9 S T H U 2 1= O 6 S I O- N O M I C SERVICES, I N C. P. 1.4
PROJECT: MT HOLLY, NC
A&L LABS
LAB DATE: 8/29/97
LAB # 44557
LAB DATE:
LAB #
PARAMETER
MG KG
LBS/DT
MG/KG
LBS/DT
SOLIDS
1.44
NITROGEN (TKN)
77800
155.6000
0.0000
PHOSPHORUS
15500
31.0000
0.0000
POTASSIUM
3500
7.0000
0.0000
SULFUR
15300
30.6000
0.0000
CALCIUM
14600
29.2000
0.0000
MAGNESIUM
3500
7.0000
0.0000
SODIUM
9500
19.0000
0.0000
IRON
12300
24.6000
0.0000
ALUMINUM
13500
27.0000
0.0000
MANGANESE
272
0.5440
0.0000
COPPER
505
1.0100
0.0000
ZINC
1010
2.0200
0.0000
AMMONIA NITROGEN
17400
34.8000
0.0000
NO3-NO2 NITROGEN
76
0.1520
0.0000
CADMIUM
3.0
0.0060
0.0000
CHROMIUM
880
1.7600
0.0000
NICKEL
170
0.3400
0.0000
LEAD
73
0.1460
0.0000
ARSENIC
1.67
0.0033
0.0000
MERCURY
3.83
0.0077
0.0000
SELENIUM
1.85
0.0037
0.0000
PH
CALCIUM CARBONATE
22800
45.6000
0.0000
VOLITILE SOLIDS
681200
1,362.4000
0.0000
ORGANIC NITROGEN
60400
120.8000
0.0000
PAN (SURFACE) f=.3
53.7920
0.0000
PAN (SUBSUR) f=.3
71.1920
0.0000
■

.T A N- 1 5- `.i t=i 1, H V 1 1 m b r 1z 1 V- fV V 111
PROJECT: MT HOLLY, NO
A&L LABS
LAB DATE: 8/29/97
LAB # 44557
LAB DATE:
LAB 4
PARAMETER
MG/KG
LBS/DT
MG/KG
LBS/DT
P205
71.1481
0.0000
K20
_
8.4322
0.0000
PAN: PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
SURFACE: SURFACE APPLICATION
SUBSUR: SUBSURFACE APPLICATION (INJECTION OR INCORPORATED
:ANALYSIB.CHT
MH-ANAL8.A97
■

IF..^
�� �� U ���4��~������ AGRICULTURAL U �������� ��U���� INC.�� �� u~ EASTERN u—uxn� x�w��uxx����u~x ��nu��u~ u~����~=" "��. .=. ..~~~~x ...,~
' 7621Whit8pineRoad ° Richmond, Virginia 23237 ~ /804\743-9401
" Fax No. ` / /��4\271-6446
Nxy 9 Y
R124-319 ACCOUNT 45671 PAGE 1 °*�� ^.0 �or
REPORT NUMBER
BIO—NOMIC SERVICES, INC. MT HOLLY NC WWTP BIO—NOMIC SERVICES, INC,
516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
LAB NUMBER = 42532
SAMPLE ID = MT HOLLY
RESULT
PARAMETER ( % )
-------------------- --------
BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT
(MG/KG) (MG/KG) ANALYST
------- ------- -------
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED 05/14/97
DATEREPORTED 05/20/97
ANALYSIS
DATE METHOD REFERENCE
------- ------------------------
SOLIDS
2^02
20200
100
JCM
05/14/97
SM
254OG
NITROGEN (TKN)
5^79
57900
100
LDR
05/15/97
EPA
351^3
PHOSPHORUS
1.58
15800
100
JCM
05/15/97
EPA
365^4
POTASSIUM
0.26
2600
100
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
SULFUR
1^43
4300
100
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
CALCIUM
1,99
19900
100
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
MAGNESIUM
0^25
2500
100
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
SODIUM
0080
8000
100
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
IRON '
9380
1
_DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
ALUMINUM
� ``
13100
10
DCN
05/15/97
SW
84676010
MANGANESE'
273
1
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
COPPER
412
1
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
ZINC
1180
1
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
!CADMIUM
4^0
1
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-7130
�CHROMIUM
`��
1190
5
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
NICKEL '
202
5
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
LEAD64
5
DCN
05/15/97
SW
846-6010
ARSENIC
1^63
0^4
DCN
05/16/97
SW
846-7061
'
ALL VALUES EXCEPT SOLIDS AND T8S ARE ON � DRY WEIGHT BASIS.
~ (C]t4l-wO�MAN NES—
Ou'reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use mour clients, and may not be reproduced inwhole minpart, nor may any reference bemade mthe

A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
R124-319 ACCOUNT 45671 PAGE 2 SAY 3
REPORT NUMBER
BIO-NOMIC': SERVICES, INC: MT HOLI...Y NC WWTP I:tT.O.. NOMIC SERVIC'E.Sr INC.'..
516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE MC 2821.7
B16SOL.IDS ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE SAMPLED
LAB NUMBER = 42532 DATE. RECEIVEI:i 05/14/9
SAMPLE ID = MT HOLLY DATE REPORTED 05/20/97
DETECTION
RESULT
RESULT
LIMIT
ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
( % )
(MG/KG)
(MG/KG)
ANALYST
DATE:
METHOD REFERENCE
MERCURY
3.46
0.1
DCN
05/16/97
SW 846-7471.
SELENIUM
1.65
0.1
DCN
05/1.6/97
SW 846--7741.
PH ASTANDARD UNITS)
7.60
AB
05/15/97
EPA 150.:1.
CALCIUM CARBONATE ECG
5.92
59200
100
DCH
05/15/97
AOAC 955.01
VOLATILE SOLIDS
71.45
714500
100
LDR
05/15/97
SM 2540G
ORGANIC NITROGEN
5.00
50000
100
DCH
05/1.5/97
CALCULATED
,ALL VALUES EXCEPT SOLIDS AND TSS ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT LASTS. CAC
N0R- C
4-q. . CHU . MAN J0Nr--S
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. Copyright 1977

^
��U �������������U���U����U LABORATORIES, INC.
�n�� u~ u~v�w�nu~nxx� ����xun�,��u~o��ux��u~ �.n�����xu��u��xxnu~��x un���
7621 Whit8DiOSROad ° Richmond, Virginia 23237 ° /804\743-9401
Fax No. /804\271-6446 ^ �
R25O—O47 ACCOUNT 4605'CD 1-1 2
'
REPORT NUMBER
BIO—NOMIC SERVICES INC MT HOLLY NC WWTP BIO—NOMIC SERVICES INC �
516 ROUNDTREE RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
-
SLUDGE ANLYSIS REPORT
D�TE SAMPLED '
LAB NUMBER = 44557 DATE RECEIVED 08/25/97
S�MPLE ID = MT HOLLY NC WWTP D�TE REPORTED O8/29/97
DETECTION
RESULT
RESULT
LIMIT
AN(III YSIS
PARAMETER
—.... —.... ----------------
( % )
--------
(MG/KG)
--.... .... .... .... ....
(MG/KG)
.... .... .... ~.... .... ....
ANALYST
-------
1)01TE
... .... .... .... ---
METHOD REFERENCE
------------------------
LEAD
73
5
JCM
—
08/26/97
_
SW 846-6010
�RSENIC
1,67
O^4
KM
O8/28/97
SW 846-7O61
MERCURY
3^83
0^1
KM
08/28/97
SW 846-7471
SE�ENIUM
1.85
0^1
KM
O8/28/97
SW 846-7741
CALCIUM CARBONATE EQ
2^28
'22800
100
DCH
08/26/97
OC 955^01
VOLATILE SOLIDS
68.12
681200
100
KCS
08/26/97
SM 2540G
ORGANIC NITROGEN
6^04
60400
100
DCH
08/26/97
CALCULATED
'
14,LL VALUES EXCEPT SOLIDS AND TSS ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS.
�_~���_''--_ �" _
Vf[ C^*,C. /C. NORMAN muNES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
County Gaston Year 1997
Permit Number WQ0001 E - M
Facility Name (as shown on permit) Phone # [phone]
Land Application Operator Ri nNomi c SPr�,; CeG Inc _
Land application of residuals as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
X YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were generated but
not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part I
-Total number of application fields in permit. 38
*Total number of fields land application occurred during the year. 6
•Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites. 142.34'
-Total number of acres land application occurred during the year. 100.1
Part II
Facility was compliant during calendar year 1995 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Environmental Management
- x.— YES NO.
IF NO, PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES, AND
EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil
pH of at least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis was performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year
and three (3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are
attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as
required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6 The Part
503 facility
3 or the Pollutant Loading Rates d not exceed any of the Pin Table 2 of 40 CFR part Limitst Concentration 3 . (pplicable t 40 CFR Part 503
503.1
regulated facilities)
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14
were complied with. (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities)
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a
f deviation, prior authorization was received from the. Division of Envirormnental Management.
I 9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or
explanations of violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were
removed in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters
has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application
of residuals.
"I CERTIFY, UNDER PENALTY OF LAW, THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR
SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINES AND IMPRISONMENT FOR
KNOWING VIOLATIONS."
Mr. Eddie Nichols, Dir. PpJJL c Works
-- Signature of Permittee Date
4mji Name and Title ( e or p t)ff Signature of Preparer
ate Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee and Preparer)
(if different from Permittee)
DEM FORM CF (10/94)
Note: Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM
Facility Name MOUNT HOLLY Permit Number WQ0001863
WWTP Name MOUNT HOLLY W . W . T . P . NPDES # NCO021156
Monitoring Period: From 01 / 01/ 97 To 12 / 31 / 97
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed
Class A
Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Alternative 4 Alternative 5 Alternative 6
Class B
Alternative 1 X Alternative 2 Alternative 3
If applicable to alternative performed (class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
— Aerobic Digestion _ Air Drying —Anaerobic Digestion —Composting —Lime Stabilization
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
In Sludge
Pathogen Density
Numt er or
Exof edences
Frequency of
Analysis
Sample
Twe
Analytical
Technique
Minimum
Geo. Mean
Maximum
Units
Fecal Colitorm
2 x 106 MPN
per gram of total
solids or 2 x 106
CFUper gram
of total solids
SEE
ATTAC
ED "
1000 MPN
per gram of
total solid
(dry weight)
Salmonella
bacteria (ui
lieu of fecal
3 MPN per 4
grams total
surd (dry
colifonn
weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33) - Please Indicate option performed
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 X Option 5
Option 6 Option 7 Option 8 Option 9 Option 10 X
No vector attraction reduction options were performed
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
X "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met."
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check
this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination. has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed
to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the
pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
BIO—NOMIC SERVICES, INC. BIO—NOMIC SERVICES, INC
DAVID W. MOTIL LAND APP. MGR. DAVID W. MOTIL LAND APP. MGR.
Prepar me and Title (type gr pnnitt,)/
Signature of Preparer Date
Land p ter Name and T (rf a licable)(type or print
Signature of Land 4plier (if applicable) Date
DEW FORM RF (10/94)

JAN, -21' 98(WEN 08:56 CITY OF MT, HOLLY TEL:[phone] F. 004
ip^R Lobaratorlea, Ina,
70�, WC. 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. SOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241�1483
704/588.8333
April 14, 1997
Reference No: 97 1303
Made For: City Of Mount Holly
P.O. Box 406 '
Mount Holly, NC 28120
Attention: Timmy Haas
Analyses Of: Wastewater - PC, TS, Sour Test
Marked:
Sludge 'dank 4/2/97 Grab
Received On: 4/02/97
Analyses:
(mg/hr/gr)
SOUR 1.30 4/08 1520 GJ
Respectfully Submitted:
PAR Laboratories, Inc,
•
.'— 8
Jpen.ice
Laboratory Director
■

JAB!. -21' 98(WEN 08:56 CITY OF MT, HOLLY
TEL:[phone] P, 003
�� •• PAR Laboratories, Inc.
'Alga )ORIES'INC. 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. 90X 411443
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241•1483
70415U.M33
April 14, 1997
Reference No: 97 1303A
Made For: City of Fit. Holly
PO SOX 406
Mt. Holly, NC 28120
Attention: Jilmy Haas
Analyses of: Submitted Sample
Xarked:* sludge Tank
Received on: 4/2/97
Analyses:
§AM91-8—i Fecal Total
F-Clmzam of
9211LOIZZ So
ota sol'
col/100m1
1 5,000 3.09
1,619
2 1,000 3.03
330
3 4,000 3.19
1,255
4 2,400 3.06
783
5 1,000 3.14
318
6 1,000 3.09
324
7 700 3.12
224
FC (geometric mean: 532
Respectfully submitted:
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
��-
JOUS. Rice
Laboratory Director
■

JAN. - 2 V 98 (WED) 08:55 CITY OF MT. HOLLY TEL.[phone] P. 001
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
L4SORAWRJES, INC. 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE. NC 28241-1463
7041586-6333
August 7, 1997
Reference No: 97 2915
Matte For: City Of Mount Holly
P.O. Box 406
Mount Holly, NC 28120
Attention: Jimmy Haas
Analyses Of; Submitted Sample for SOUR test
Marked: 7/2 Grab
Ileceived One 7/29/97
Analyses:
(mg/hr/gr)
SOUR .85 8/05 1500 GJ
Respectfully submitted:
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
1— 8 q24-L
J01 S. Riee
Laboratory Director
�A� To DRve mo rid
ILO
■

JAK -21'98(WEN 08:56 CITY OF MT. HOLLY TEL:[phone]
i
[PAR
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
GORATM2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC28241.1483
7041586.8333
August 7, 1997
Reference No: 97 2915
Made For: City of Mount Holly
PO Box 406
Mt. Holly, NC 28120
Attention: Jimmy Haas
Analyses of: Submitted Sample
Marked: 7/2 Grab
Received on: 7/29/97
Analyses:
,gamnle # F2cal Total
Coliform Solids
col/100m1
1
21,000
2.6
2
42,000
2.5
3
44,000
2.5
4
53,000
2.7
5
36,000
2.4
6
35,000
2.5
7
40.,000
2.5
FC
(geometric mean):
14,826
Respectfully submitted:
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
S. Rice
Laboratory Director
FC/gram of
Total Solids
8,076
16,800
17,600
19,629
15,000
14,000
16,000
P. 002
■

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A'N/A' IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE..
FACILITY NAME Mount Holly W W T P. PERMIT # WQ0001863
OWNER Gary Allen SITE # MH —3 CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (non 503 regulated facilities only) 6.2
OPERATOR Gary Allen FIELD # 1 ACRES PERMITTED 14 ACRES UTILIZED 14
TOTAL DRY TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL) 31.22
DATE or
MONTH
Gallons /or Cubic Yards
(specify)
Dry Tons
per Acre
Residual Source
%Solids
x '`v f "'
t�ol� PN►�°ro€u,uon
uav Av°rw9ei
Rate
Application
Method
(surfac, or
Injection)
1( reogjting b month keep these.
i<:'dail recordsonVsite
Crop
Total
per Acre
tam., n.wa
post 24 We.
Sde Conditions
(Dry, Moist, Wet)
5/9
.45,500
3250 -
.274
W.W.T.P.
2.02
.3
S
0
D
Fescu
5/10
39,000
2786
.235
It "
Till
Ifof
"
If
If
1A
5/12
84,500
6036
.508
If
"
Ifif
" "
of If
if "
" "
It 11
5/13
58,500
4179
.352
If"
" if
" if
" "
to "
of"
Isoff
5 14
104 000
7429
.626
"
11 't
" "
"
" if
" "
go IN
5/15
39,000
2786
.235
" If
Ti If
" Ti
" To
" if
" "
11 If
Lime Application
DATE LBSIACRE
N/A
TOTALS: I PAN I P
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
Annual
1370,500
126,4641 2.231 70.4
.007
.018
5.31
1.84
.285
.015
--
.901
.007
5.26
Cumulative
.024
.025
11.42
4.55
.285
.015
--
1.28
.011
7.23
'
Permit Limit lbs./acre ear - 1st Crop / 2nd Crop
Permitted Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate (lbsJacre)
36
34
2 677
1 33
267
15 --
3 4 917.47R
X—-------- —------------/— --- --
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPL ) DATE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the Information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of €Ines and Imprisonment for knowing violations."
DEM FORM FSF (2/95)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A'N/A' IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
FACILITY NAME Mount Holly W.W.T.P. PERMIT # WQ0001863
OWNER Gary Allen SITE # MH-3 CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (non 503 regulated facilities only)
OPERATOR Gary Allen FIELD # 2 ACRES PERMITTED 11.6 ACRES UTILIZED
TOTAL DRY TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL) 24.13
DATE or
MONTH
Gallons /or Cubic Yards
s ecif
Dry Tons
per Acre
Residual Source
o
/o Solids
�� sa
.off
use Avong s
Mlnerell�suon
Rate
Application
Method
(surface or
(
Injectlon)
I1 jepo&0 p _month keep Ih9s�9
��Qx�"dall reCbrds'ori site r
Crop
p
Total
per Acre
tacn.s n.ru.s
post 24 Ms.
Site Conditions
(Dry, Moist, Wet)
5/8
91 000
W.W.
2.02
0
D
Fescu
5/9
58,500
5043
11 11
11 11
11 11
If 11
11 11
t1
OI
5 1 0
52,000
4
.378
11
11 11
11 11
to 11
tl 11
11 11
II If
5 1
3922
go 11
n
of
n u
n If
5 13
19,500
1681
" "
to "
" If
" to
" of
If"
fill
5 1 4
19,500
1
.142
11 of
11 11
11 11
1f 11
11 11
11 It
It 11
TOTALS:
Annual 286,000
Cumulative.
Permit Limit (lbs./acre/year) - ist Crop / 2nd
Permitted Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate (It
5.1
Lime Application
DATE I LBSJACRE
36 1 34 , 677 1, 338 1267 115 1 -- 1374 1 89 12,478
X---1—�----�--- r`--`—-----�—a —1lL
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLI ) DA E
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the Information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of tines and Imprisonment for knowing violations,"
Y
DEM FORM FSF (2/95)

Ar.r.a.AL L—..— AN r_..,.}►TIG....=LD __.-.MA. - - - -)Rk-
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A'N/A' )N A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
FACILITY NAME Mount Holly W.W.T.P. PERMIT # WQ0001863 .
OWNER Melanie Jones SITE # MH-2 CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (non 503 regulated facilities only)
OPERATOR Charles Killian FIELD # 5 ACRES PERMITTED 17.4 ACRES UTILIZED 15
TOTAL DRY TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL) 12.9
DATE or
MONTH
Gallons /or Cubic Yards
s ecif
Dry Tons
Per Acre
Residual Source
% Solids
o» ;
N ! AP t� s
usv,''Avora9eb
Mineralization
gate
Application
Method
(Surface
Injection)
i} re orting. by month keep thesQ'
P
Ball : fecords'":
Crop
p
past 24owau
Desk z� Hrs.
Site Conditions
(Dry, Moist, Wet)
Total
per Acre
P
8/111
65,000
4333
.26
W.W.T.P.
1.44
.3
S
0
M
Fescue
8/121
97,500
6500
.39
"
8/131
52,000
3467
.21 :-
Lime Application
DATE LBSJACRE
N /A
TOTALS:
j PAN P -
As
Cd
Cr
tJ
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
7n
Annual
Cumulative
214,500 14,30
.86 26.7
.003
.005
1.51
.87
.125
.007
--
.292
.CO3
,1.7
1.173
.033
16.0
4.65
.8.04
.02
--
1,0 .59
.027
.14.
Permit Limit lbs./acre/ ear - 1st Crop / 2nd Crot7
Permitted Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate (lbs./acre) 36 1 34 12,677 14,338 26.7 15 -- 374 1 89 1,2478
= -- -- = _---Ae"
X --- — ---
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLI ) DATE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the Information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of fines and Imprisonment for knowing violations."
DEM FORM FSF (2/95)

PLEHac lviAKE r% wrY OF r nia dLANr% rvn,A TO , �JMPL—. _— , W D t..--...1TEC . _- - JACH .... _. CATI _ . _ _ LD. _
PLACE A'N/AIN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
ACILITY NAME Mound Hn11y W.W•T.P. PERMIT # WQ0001863
IWNER Melanie ,TnnP.-; SITE #. MH-2 CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (non 503 regulated facilities only)
IPERATOR Charles Ki 1 1 i an FIELD # 4 ACRES PERMITTED 12.6 ACRES UTILIZED 8
OTAL DRY TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL)
DATE or
MONTH
Gallons /or Cubic Yards
s ecif
Dry Tons
per Acre
per
Residual Source
%Solids
'A.U.rpos 1oE
u'ai`Av""rt�j
Minerallzetlon
Rate
Application
Method
(sumac• or
Inla°tlon)
I1 repo'n' -qb pntf?.keep (hose;
' ::;. ,.d il` records `on site M :
Crop
Total
per
post 4 Hm.
v"� 2� ►tr..
Site Conditions
(Dry, Moist, Wet)
8 1
Fes
.44
rr
rr
rr
n
rr
rr
�e
Lime Application
DATE I L.BSIACRE
'OTALS: PAN P As Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni I Se I Zn
,nnual 97,500 12.188 .73 3 22.63 .0024.0044 11.28 1.737 1 .107 1 .006 1 — — — .248 1 .0027 1.47
umulative .8344 .027 112.251 3.6 1.382 1.00781 — — — 11.08 1.0215110.9
Permit Limit lbs./acre ear - 1st Crop / 2nd Crop
Permitted Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate (lbs./acre) 36 34 h.677 1.3381 267 1 15 -- 374 89 2478
—/
(SIG TURE OF LAN APPLIER) DATE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the Information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of fines and Imprisonment for knowing violations."'
DEM FORM FSF (2/95)
•

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A IVA' IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
..FACILITY NAME Mount Tint 1 y WWmn — PERMIT # WQ0001863
OWNER Mrs 1 a n i P ane�
T SITE # MH— 2 CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (non 503 regulated facilities only)
• --
OPERATOR Cha r 1 P G K i 1 1 i an FIELD # 2 ACRES PERMITTED 31.4 ACRES UTILIZED
TOTAL DRY TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL) 51.3
DATE or
MONTH
Gallons /or Cubic Yards
s ecif
Dry Tons
per Acre
per
Residual Source
o
/oSolids
�
�tcl�''t��lct
uae Average
6Unenllzauon
Rate
Application
Method
(Surleee or
Injection)
I( i0 t i( b)/-.6— fh; keep
; : tia11 fecords on site t Y,=
Crop
kKtwR.wa�
Post 24 We.
Site Conditi ,
(Dry; Moist, Wet)
Total
per
1.44
.3
S
0
M
escue
8/15
123, 500
4117
29
u
n
u
n
n
n
it
n
it
n
n
n
n
n
11
it
it
5
14
11
11
11
It
TOTALS:
Annual
851
PAN I P - i.. As I Cd
1.17 .028
Ni
Llme Apellcajtlon
DATE I LBSJACRE
Se I Zn
Permit Limit lbs./acre ear - 1st Crop / 2nd Crop
Permitted Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate (lbsJacre)4=56,
36 1 34 12,67711,33267 15 --- 374 89 2 4 7 8
X --- ------- _____Izer(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLIER) i
°9 certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the Information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of fines and Imprisonment for knowing violations.
a
4
DEM FORM FSF (2195)

e
0

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A'N/A' IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
FACILITY NAME Mount Holly WWTP PERMIT # WQ0001863
OWNER Melanie Jones SITE # MH-2 CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (non 503 regulated facilities only)
OPERATOR Charles Killian FIELD # 6 ACRES PERMITTED 16.2 ACRES UTILIZED 15
TOTAL DRY TONS APPLIED (ANNUAL) 17.1
DATE'or
MONTHper
Gallons /or Cubic Yards
s ecif
Dry Tons
Acre
Residual Source
o
/o Solids
AVI, . *
lo�;txol
us9'Av9ng4
Mlnerallzatlon
Rate
Application
Method
(Surface or
Inlectlon)
II repot�ng b)r mon(h keep (hose
�""'
`'::. Ball .records. on site
Crop
p
Total
per Acre
Ircn..naw.lt
past 24 Its.
Site Conditions
(Dry, Moist; Wet)
8/11
65,000
4333
.26
WWTP
1.44
.3
S
0
M
Fescu
8/121
97,500
6500
.39
"'
"
"
"
"
"
"
8/13
91,1000
6067
.36
8/14
32,500
2167
.13
"
TOTALS:
Annual
Cumulative
286,000 11
PAN I P
rd
Lime A Ilcatlon
DATE LBSJACRE
N/A
'`LBS/ACREfy4
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
.004
.007
2.01
1.15
.1
--
.388
.004
2.3
.004
.007
2.01
1.15
.166
.009
--
.388
.004'
2.3
Permit Limit lbs./acre ear - 1st Crop / 2nd Crop
Permitted Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate (lbs /acre) 00936 1 34 12677 11338 267 15 7374 8 9 478
X--- -- -- - ----- -------!y
(SIGNA URE OF LAND APPLIER) DATE
"I certify, under penalty, of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered end evaluated the Information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of fines and Imprisonment for knowing violations."
DEM FORM FSF (2/95)

State of N6,.h Carolina
Department10-f Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` • •
Division of Environmental Management rr
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary [D FE N FI
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 6, 1993
.C.1),gi" T. OF
Lawrence Matthews N%:' - ` --' I:` -SouRCE3
_S=-& ME; ITU_:
3100 Spring Forest Road �G �99�
Raleigh, NC 27604 r
F EN�AQjdiriLliliiL
Subject: Annual M�i�iUi&4cMds#o Y.+ Requirements
Treatment a d Application of Residuals/Sludge
PermifN6 WQ0001 g-O =863 44�, r
-,Gaston--County
Dear Mr. Matthews:
The purpose of this letter is a reminder that the monitoring requirements contained in
the subject permit must be completed by no later than December 31, 1993 and the Annual
i Report submitted to the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) by no later March
1, 1994. The Report must be submitted (in triplicate) to the following address:
DEHNR/DEM/Water Quality Section
Facilities Assessment Unit
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Due to limitations in storage space, please submit the reports in bound form rather than
in notebook form. Permittees are subject to civil penalty for failing to submit the Annual
Report as required by their permit.
Enclosed are summary and certification sheets that must be attached to your annual
report. Please complete these sheets and if necessary make copies of the blank forms if
extra forms are needed for additional sites.
At the current time, the monitoring information that must be included in this report are
the requirements contained in your State issued land application permit.
You will however note that the report forms which are enclosed have been modified
from last year to include additional information required by EPA as outlined in 40 CFR Part
503. The information marked on the form related only to Part 503 is optional for the State
at this time unless it is specifically addressed in the State issued permit. However since the
requirements of 40 CFR Part 503 are self implementing, they are a legally binding and
enforceable federal requirement for all persons subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part
503, even if these requirements are not currently contained in a State issued permit.
P.O. Box 29535, Rale Via.;: si�rth Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

SLUDGE TRACKING FOR CITY OF BELMONT WWTP FOR YEAR
WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE RECORDS
DATE
DYS/MTH
OPERATOR
TIME
BED #
MLSS,MG/L
MLSS,LBS
LBS/MTH
MLVSS,MG/L
MLVSS,LBS
VOL.,GPD
GPD
CLARIF
e SOLIDS
5/14/91
31
EP,MM,JC
8:15A/4:15P
1
36860
44268
1,428.00
144000
4,645.16
WEST
3.7
5/17/91
31
BT,MM
9:15P/3:15P
2
38740
108000
3,483.87
108000
3,483.87
WEST
3.9
5/20/91
31
MM,BT,JC
2:30P/4:15P
3
41770
10973
353.97
31SOO
1,016.13
WEST
4.2
5/21/90
31
MM,BT
E3:45A/1:OOP
3
42830
27964
902.06
76500
2,467.74
WEST
4.3
S128191
31
BT,EP
1:45P/4:15P
8
46930
17613
568.16
45000
1,451.61
WEST
4.7
5/29/91
31
EP,BT
6.35A/11.30A
8
76430
34421
1,110.35
54000
-1,741.94
WEST
7.6
6/7/91
30
MM,EP
3:30P/6:30P
4
40003
18016
600.53
54000
1,800.00
WEST
4.1
6/17/91
30
BT,MM
10:OSA/12:40
7
40840
15327
510.90
4S000
1,500.00
WEST
4.1
7/24/91
31
MM
8:30A/10:50A
2
38260
13370
431.29
41940
1,352.90
WEST
3.8
8/13/91
31
MM,BT
2:17P/4:17P
4
38220
11475
370.16
36000
1,161.29
WEST
3.8
8/20/91
31
MM,EP
10:30A/1:15P
3
32010
13215
426.29
49500
1,596.77
WEST
3.2
9/13/91
30
MM
1:35P/4:OOP
1
34729
13033
434.43
34728
9617
45000
1,500.00
E & W
3.
9/13/91
30
MM,EP,CS
4:OOP/6:30P
7
33240
12475
415.83
24534
9208
45000
1,500.00
E & W
3''
^ 9/16/91
30
JC,BA,CS
2:50P/5:00P
3
41722
13153
438.43
29954
9443
37800
1,260.00
WEST
4.Z
9/20/91
30
MM,EP
9:45A/12/45P
2
15520
6980
232.67
54000
1,800.00
E & W
1.6
10/11/91
31
MM,EP
9:15A/11:4SA
4
30738
11536
372.13
22654
8577
45000
1,451.61
E & W
3.1
10/21/91
31
ED,MM,JC,B2:OOP/4:20P
6
26220
8966
289.23
40SOO
1,306.45
E & W
2.6
10/23/91
31
MM,EP
11:25A/3:OOP
1
19840
10424
336.26
63000
2,032.26
E & W
2.1
10/25/91
31
EP,BT
10:50A/2:30P
2
24200
13623
439.45
67500
2,177.42
E & W
2.4
11/8/91
30
MM
11:23P/2:30P
3
10800
4864
162.13
54000
1,800.00
E & W
1.1
1111'18/9i
30
MM,EP
11:15A/2:20P
7
27426
8234
274.47
20232
6074
36000
1,200.00
E & W
2.7
12/13/91
31
EP,HH,CS
3:30P/5:30P
1
18254
5481
176.81
13258
3981
36000
1,161.29
E & W
1.8
12/18/91
31
EP,MM,HH
11:25A/2:5OP
2
23422
12306
396.97
17370
9127
63000
2,032.26
E & W
2.3
12/20/91
31
MM
1:14P/4:25P
3
23062
11252
362.97
16970
8280
58500
1,887.10
E & W
2.3
802066
446969
14,517.37
90684
21388
1330740
43,325.81
YEAR 1992
2/13/92
29
MM
12:16P/3:OOP
6
27884
11511
20934
8642
49500
E & W
2.8
2/14/92
29
EP,HH
10:25A/1:15P
1
27516
11359
20520
8471
49000
E & W
2.75
2/14/92
29
EP,HH
1:25P/S:OOP
4
27516
14457
20520
10782
63000
E & W
2.75
Ica Q- DEPT. OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND
03iffMUNITY Dr,,VLLOPMENT

CITY OF BELMONT
SLUDGE ANALYSIS TRACKING
DATE % T- SOLIDS..CHLORIDES..PHOSPHORUS..LEAD..COPPER
-1.
.CADMIUM.
1z1q
61-11
14-1-3!T4L
3•Zs /L
21, Z i x L.
Z--
8•
6L.b L
433.
L
TOTAL
5
1mq IL10.
1
10.
. ML
DATE
SODIUM..T-NITROGEN..NITRATE/NITRITE
N..MAGNESIUM
.SULFATE
W 1z a L
'10-0m, IL
1,30S.11
• 11 m KN = I Sol
z
< 1.()
1 1
50.a
I L
L
L
< I. L-
TOTAL
, D
.11
1 n,An M4 IL IZI ON
I 1
1.0
t
DATE
POTASSIUM..ZINC..NICKEL
.CHROMIUM..CALCIUM..NH3-N..PH..
WIVOI
53-50m L
Z4.4q 1L
'Wo0 IL.
.0 m /L
82. •Sz
G.1 L
.5
IV
110.00
0, 8
Z
.00
L.
I S
FTOTALI
113.50
I S
L
0 L
PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (by calculation)T
L

TRACKING OF ALL DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR SLUDGE
LAND APPLICATION
1 . SOURCE OF SLUDGE: &y OF ✓ N ► WTI Duw
2. DATE OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: O zS q0
3. LOCATION OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: (SITE, FIELD, OR ZONE #)
,PA uL M�SSeQ'S FA PA ou WILSog FIELD D
4. METHOD OF APPLICATION:
5. WEATHER CONDITIONS: 4of SL,wo
6. SOIL CONDITIONS: Tv 'eeo< Qp
7. TYPE OF CROP OR.CROPS TO BE GROWN ON FIELD:fAsikkC AND
9AV 6RA55
8. VOLUME OF SLUDGE APPLIED IN DRY TONS/ACRE AND GALLONS/ACRE
ISO OKs (o I AG - 29.56 49s ac
9. ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE TOTALS OF DRY TON/ACRE OF SLUDGE,
ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE LBS/ACRE OF EACH HEAVY METAL, ANNUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN(PAN), AND ANUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PHOSPHORUS APPLIED EACH FIELD:
LOADS HAULED TODAY _TONS/TRUCK U/(ONS TOTAL TONS
DRY TONS/ACRE OF SLUDGE: APPLIED TODAY o'IOKS G
ANNUAL TO DATE UAfWOWa( k0 RF,COUS AT RAKII-k5 fO
COMMULATIVE uKKKow, < WEYM5 RAuugi

�GqO F1cl. 11
E�� E
TRACKING OF ALL DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR SLUDGE
LAND APPLICATION
1. SOURCE OF SLUDGE: &N OF '&'wpg-f Wd*i-1 Duwc ! S
2.
DATE OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: 912g
A 0
3.
'
LOCATION OF SLUDGE APPLICATION:
UL MESSER'S FARM OW UJILSOu ?gyp„ 6r-LA
(SITE,
15* D
FIELD, OR ZONE #):
4.
ME HOD OF PPLICATION:
� CotuKV NPA Suyooi 19
L A
N6y,Ryyivar
Sp�i4D
'I k0Al
5.
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Ao'r
StwNy
6.
SOIL CONDITIONS:�
Z20KE
7.
TYPE OF CROP OR,CROPS
uAV 6RA55
TO BE GROWN ON FIELD: I SIV12E AND
S. VOLUME OF SLUDGE APPLIED IN DRY TONS/ACRE AND GALLONS/ACRE
54 loNG 7 1.1 hC. 4q,oq To-gglz
9. ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE TOTALS OF DRY TON/ACRE OF SLUDGE,
ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE LBS/ACRE OF EACH HEAVY METAL, ANNUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN(PAN), AND ANUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PHOSPHORUS APPLIED EACH FIELD:
LOADS HAULED TODAY= `7 TONS/TRUCK TOTAL TONS
DRY TONS/ACRE OF SLUDGE: APPLIED TODAY -4Q:OQ 0)6 AC
ANNUAL TO DATE___u11Moog - go _.E.cW5 AST PVAf Of
COMMULATIVE UKKowN - << lavious Ww4K6

Iq9 � �E�� �
TRACKING OF ALL DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR SLUDGE
LAND APPLICATION
1. SOURCE OF SLUDGE: v6 OF Z w"'rf WWI Dl uw� -
2. DATE OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: Vloh I
3. LOCATION OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: (SITE, FIELD, OR ZONE #):
'PUL MISSEW FAN Off MUM RD; FIELD T
4. METHOD OF APPLICATION: I/Rd LOAD SP,4DE@� -I-&V kb f-ROAl
/G SDI gl[ lkm SULP9W to NEARIMU.E -
5. WEATHER CONDITIONS: do� SM4
6. SOIL CONDITIONS: N/
7. TYPE OF CROP OR,CROPS TO BE GROWN ON FIELD: A5fj klk AND
9AV CRMS
8. VOLUME OF SLUDGE APPLIED IN DRY TONS/ACRE AND GALLONS/ACRE
2 Oils (o . l ,4C = Qci oAs l hG
9. ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE TOTALS OF DRY TON/ACRE OF SLUDGE,
ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE LBS/ACRE OF EACH HEAVY METAL, ANNUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN(PAN), AND ANUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PHOSPHORUS APPLIED EACH FIELD:
4
LOADS HAULED TODAY = I ws TONS/TRUCK 49s TOTAL TONS 2
DRY TONS/ACRE OF SLUDGE: APPLIED TODAY �.gq EONS AG
ANNUAL TO DATE IM3 4 JAC,
COMMULATIVE 4b'Z3 TousL4c'

TRACKING OF ALL DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR SLUDGE
LAND APPLICATION
1. SOURCE OF SLUDGE: &N OF "*'b9w9f WaP DNt► cl �)" -
2. DATE OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: 0l /91
3. LOCATION OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: (SITE, FIELD, OR ZONE #):
'PUL AAESSEW6 FARM 09 WILS09 FAD•, FIELD 17
4. MET,/HOD OF APPLICATION : NY LOAD )PRaNa 4kb kom
'(il Cow—ry ITAPK 54PLY IN CAMViuLI�
5. WEATHER CONDITIONS: flb� Jmw IO's
W as L'yP"-fED = KO 12AIA
6. SOIL CONDITIONS: F`I
7. TYPE OF CROP OR.CROPS TO BE GROWN ON FIELD:TA5U.RF AND
9AV CRA5s
8. VOLUME OF SLUDGE APPLIED IN DRY TONS/ACRE AND GALLONS/ACRE
140 5 - l AC, = 2,1(o SAC,
9. ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE TOTALS OF DRY TON/ACRE OF SLUDGE,
ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE LBS/ACRE OF EACH HEAVY METAL, ANNUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN(PAN), AND ANUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PHOSPHORUS APPLIED EACH FIELD:
LOADS HAULED TODAY- �� TONS/TRUCK TOTAL TONS
DRY TONS/ACRE OF SLUDGE: APPLIED TODAY Z3,( MOILS C
ANNUAL TO DATE 40.3 ONs/AG
COMMULATIVE &q.S�/AC

flE� D
TRACKING OF ALL DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR SLUDGE
LAND APPLICATION
1. SOURCE OF SLUDGE: Cary OF --'bgwgf WTI V I)ejigQ
2. DATE OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: rl112�a I
3. LOCATION OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: (SITE, FIELD, OR ZONE #)
'PA6LL MESSER'S i✓ARA Off WILSM EL FleLD "D
4. METHOD OF APPLICATION : PRY LOAD SPPLEA ES IRMX', _�KoM
41 L'OWJ'f`f AVAL SILEPLI IN 9522-VV►L
5. WEATHER CONDITIONS: kof F SLw)j4 q '6
6. SOIL CONDITIONS:_DRY
7. TYPE OF CROP OR.CROPS TO BE GROWN ON FIELD: fASI(ukiE AND
9AV CRASS
8. VOLUME OF SLUDGE APPLIED IN DRY TONS/ACRE AND GALLONS/ACRE
lob ous �.IAc � 9 �3&�ous/a�
9. ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE TOTALS OF DRY TON/ACRE OF SLUDGE,
ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE LBS/ACRE OF EACH HEAVY METAL, ANNUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN(PAN), AND ANUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PHOSPHORUS APPLIED EACH FIELD:
LOADS HAULED TODAY ID TONS/TRUCK TOTAL TONS
DRY TONS/ACRE OF SLUDGE: APPLIED TODAY q•Sq-'INIS/AG
ANNUAL TO DATE 50.17 '%NS/AL
COMMULATIVE 'iq.(F1 A&5/,4�

l ELD
(I. I Ac—)
TRACKING OF ALL DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES FOR SLUDGE
LAND APPLICATION
1. SOURCE OF SLUDGE: Cry OF '59'ww wall 31 Ell lei ,
2. DATE OF SLUDGE APPLICATION:
3. LOCATION OF SLUDGE APPLICATION: (SITE, FIELD, OR ZONE #):
'P, L MESSEV6 FARM ou - WILS09 EP ; FIELD E
4. METHOp Of APPLICATION:
5. WEATHER CONDITIONS: l�D� F Suzy /GveylgG Skmr, aS
6. SOIL CONDITIONS:
7. TYPE OF CROP OR . CROPS TO BE GROWN ON FIELD: TAAVAZIE AND
UAV C RAQES
8. VOLUME OF SLUDGE APPLIED IN DRY TONS/ACRE AND GALLONS/ACRE
9. ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE TOTALS OF DRY TON/ACRE OF SLUDGE,
ANNUAL AND CUMMULATIVE LBS/ACRE OF EACH HEAVY METAL, ANNUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN(PAN), AND ANUAL
LBS/ACRE OF PHOSPHORUS APPLIED EACH FIELD:
X
LOADS HAULED TODAY= LDSTONS/TRUCK % S TOTAL TONS_
DRY TONS/ACRE OF SLUDGE: APPLIED TODAY ISfo l-1 _
ANNUAL TO DATE l&- Ox C
r15w E COMMULATIVE 16.3fp ou�ThC

IEPORT NUMBER
MP. 2 6 FAM
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road . Richmond Virginia 23237 . [phone]
SEND
To: W TIl\F;)USE ENVIRONMEN.
AT TN". JOHN VINCF_-NT
? 0 Q'CX 1308
j CARY NC 27312
)ATE OF REPORT G?/ 1 9 / 90 PAGE 1
GROWER: P MESSURE
PO# 005053
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY.
R
ACC"T # 45 `9:1
JOHN VINCEN'l
LAB
ORGANIC ••
MATTER
HOS.PHORU .
a�, re . a.• rs��
0
C
-CM,OIUM
D�E
7 CaB,otga ,
v'
*c+ASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
SAMPLE
X
C�SNUMBER
; .sp,�a--•
•
WER
J4SC?
`.
tiU%
BAD
`$ J T y \
K~� MQ ' G"r' . H �.Na
NUMBER
RATE Ibt/A
M 6 : ;?.: 'e.a
PP a4 T
o}G A
�Pd l3-J�.1T
N RATE',
.P.P,t4.!
PHt
r'
PH' '
meq�10QQ
_megg000
8i'6
2.3 97M
13 L
22 "L
s 46.:L.-
J.89 V
360 M
5.3
6.9
0.6
3.3
3.6
�2.b
54a8
i5'.0
06897
2.5 101Ft
23::h{
.�Ir.�"ti"
'�6' �
��&�1J
"41f1 �M
�,:
6.1
--6.9
0.5.
3.7
3.2
6.8
55,.9
4.0
1clH
4't:s VH
65 VS
66 M
74 H
390 M
5.6
5.9
0.6
.3.4
5.0
16.3
57.7
19.
;9;
2.6 103F
57 VH
80 V1
25. V
:: 40 M
200• L
4.7
6.8
1.4
2.8
2.3
ll.S
35.4
50.5
}cyvC
3. 1 11 3H
136 V H
166. Vt
43 _L
50 M
240 L
4.5
6.7
1.9
3.6
3.0
11.5
3.3.1
52. 4
(SEE EXPLANATIONAN BACK) ; .
♦
_�y(,1'!J S�
,-ti 'Jr ��
�
�r
l
i
i, �` 4 �\
<
S.r .`.
,��'�. .^ c
� C 1
,e. '_ice• .s
� l S Y•.I•. E f'S.
{ .n
1
l�:ti.R�1 r Gam'
�'�^i�Y �`i�'{1v. �v
SAMPL
NITRATE
SULFUR
K
T
' �
a��]]ty
�ll�
E#
NUMBE*
Zs
_D
Lh�
' Sy .
� 3
h1T'?,:
_
larv- �c4'
VIJ4`+
r� i
.,. •�
4` '`
1 IL
Pp"03-N RATE
RATE
YfE�if.-{v".H
3
a i.i,
,�
i• fJy
" �'�
,
t,
} �'
�4..
1

r: gip. 6 f fP
NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC. I
7621 Whitepine Road . Richmond Virginia 23237 • [phone]
SEND v, _. S—TI Pl1 `.-{Q) U--4S= :: NV I "?CN NF—N. GROWER: ? MESSURF
TO A i ^l. ,i0Hby VI i.0 1-N7 ?0# 005053
L :tA N! 2 I i1 -.
ATE L.I J .� f �!� PAGE SOIL FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS (Ibs./A)
A
I Fescue
4 t
0.5
B
; Fescue
4 t
0.5
C
Fescue
4 t
0.5
D
Fescue
4 t
1.5
E
Fescue
4 t
2.0
R
SAMPLES ACC 1 4 ` 5 i '� 2
SUBMITTED J OH N U I j E II I'
BY:
50
85
170
0-
50
60
170
0
50
40
1:50.
0.
50
30
170
25
50
0
170
20
MARK-%pply Dolomitic limestone to supply Magnesium on C, D, & E.
Magnesium may be supplied as Magnesium Oxide or K-Mag.
On A & B apply (50-15-75) per acre each time field is pastured down.
On C apply (50-0-70) per acre each time field is pastured down.
On D & E apply (50-0-75) per acre each time field is,pastured down.
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
BY
"Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may. not be reproduced in whole orin part, nor may any reference be made to the work, the results
or the compar- In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior writlp" vulhodzation." Copyright 1977
NORM
-G
A-G
A-G
A-H
A-H
W.

LPARPAR Laboratories, Inc.
LABORATORIES, INC. 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
JUNE 26, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 2199
MADE FOR:
ATTENTION:
ANALYSES OF:
MARKED:
RECEIVED ON:
ANALYSES:
CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
CAROL STANDAFER
SOIL SAMPLES
SAMPLE #1 - FIELD D SOIL
SAMPLE #2 - FIELD E SOIL
6/12/91
SAMPLE
PH VALUE (SU)
Ca
Cd
Cu
K
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Pb
Zn
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
o
/JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
1 2
6.1 5.7
(PPM AS RECEIVED)
314.37
481.93
6.00
4.28
12.38
17.95
20.81
52.20
206.38
143.20
12.10
16.46
156.00
176.00
2.43
3.94
16.69
24.17
10.23
12.35
6.33
9.33

PAR Laboratories, Inc.
PAR
LABORATORIES, INC. 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
DECEMBER 4, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 4107
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: SOIL SAMPLE
MARKED: FIELD "A"
RECEIVED ON: 11/20/91
ANALYSES:
DATE
TIME
pH VALUE
7.2
11/26
1330
(PPM
AS RECEIVED)
Ca
2.50
11/27
1400
Cd
.078
11/26
1531
Cu
1.30
11/26
1531
K
6.10
11/27
1400
Mg
90.00
11/27
1400
Mn
75.00
11/27
1400
Na
47.00
11/27
1400
Ni
2.39
11/26
1531
Pb
3.63
11/26
1531
Zn
2.20
11/26
1531
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
19.66
11/25
1000
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

I
��� PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-.1483
704/588-8333
JUNE 29, 1990
REFERENCE NO: 90 1804
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CHUCK HEATH
ANALYSES OF: SUBMITTED SAMPLE FOR TCLP
MARKED: A
RECEIVED ON: 6/19/90
ANALYSES:
pH VALUE
CORROSIVITY
REACTIVITY
FLASH POINT
IGNITABILITY
*ARSENIC
*BARIUM
*CADMIUM
*CHROMIUM
*LEAD
*MERCURY
*SELENIUM
*SILVER
PAINT FILTER TEST
MOISTURE
* DETECTION LIMIT
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
,0OHN S. RICE
-`LABORATORY DIRECTOR
6.6
NON CORROSIVE
NON REACTIVE
> 2000 F ' .
NON IGNITABLE
(PPM)
<.05
<1
<.01
<.05
<.02
<.002
<.05
<.05
CONTAINS FREE LIQUID
98.17%

��� PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
JUNE 29, 1990
REFERENCE NO:
MADE FOR:
ATTENTION:
90 1806
CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
CHUCK HEATH
ANALYSES OF: DRIED SLUDGE SAMPLES
MARKED: AS LISTED
RECEIVED ON: 6/19/90
ANALYSES:
SAMPLE SOLIDS
c�)
PILE
60.8
BED
#2
77.2
BED
#3
82.1
BED
#4
45.5
BED
#5
28.7
BED
#6
34.2
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
J2J
6/JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
MOISTURE
39.2
22.8
17.9
54.5
71.3
65.8

PF
��� PAR Laboratories, Inc.
LABORATORIES, 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
JULY 13, 1990
REFERENCE NO: 90 1805
MADE FOR:
ATTENTION:
ANALYSES OF:
MARKED:
RECEIVED ON:
ANALYSES:
CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
CHUCK HEATH
SLUDGE
"B"
6/19/90
pH VALUE (SU) 6.8
SOLIDS 1.0
(PPM AS RECEIVED)
Al
<1
Ba
<.2
Ca
55
Cd
<.008
T-Cr
2.20
Cu
40
K
60
Mg
50
Na
1,010
Ni
.80
Pb
<.05
Zn
23
Cn=
<.05
NH3 as
N
140
TKN
560
NO2 as
N
.05
NO3 as
N
1.01
TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS
47
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
0HN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

PAR PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
JUNE 20, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 2189
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: SLUDGE
MARKED: DRYING BED SLUDGE
RECEIVED ON: 6/12/91
ANALYSES:
pH VALUE (SU) 4.5
SOLIDS (%) 87.66
(PPM AS RECEIVED)
Ca
82.82
Cd
.255
T-Cr
.44
Cu
27.21
K
53.50
Mg
25.50
Na
70.10
Ni
7.60
Pb
3.28
Zn
24.49
TOTAL NITROGEN
7,308.11
TKN
7,308
NO2 -NO3 as N
. 1 1
NH3 as N
<.1
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
76.83
CHLORIDES
57.17
SULFATES
<1
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
5 -
JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

PAR PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
JUNE 20, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 2190-1
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: SLUDGE SAMPLE FOR TCLP
MARKED: DRYING BED SLUDGE
RECEIVED ON: 6/12/91
ANALYSES:
pH VALUE
4.5
CORROSIVITY
NON CORROSIVE
REACTIVITY
NON REACTIVE
FLASH POINT (OF)
>200
IGNITABILITY
NON IGNITABLE
(mg/1)
ARSENIC
<.5
BARIUM
<10
CADMIUM
<.1
CHROMIUM
<.5
LEAD
< . 5 ,
MERCURY
<.02
SELENIUM
<.1
SILVER
<.5
PAINT FILTER TEST
CONTAINS NO FREE LIQUID
CONTINUED . . .

L
R
TORIES, INC.
JUNE 20, 1991
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
REFERENCE NO: 91 2190-2
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: SLUDGE SAMPLE FOR TCLP
MARKED: DRYING BED SLUDGE
RECEIVED ON: 6/12/91
ANALYSES:
(mg/l)
Endrin
<.002
Lindane
<.04
Methoxychlor
<1
Toxaphene
<.05
2,4-D
<1
2,4,-TP (Silvex)
<.1
Benzene
<.05
Carbon tetrachloride
<.05
Chlordane
<.003
Chlorobenzene
<10
Chloroform
<.6
o-Cresol
<20
m-Cresol
<20
p-Cresol
<20
Cresol
<20
CONTINUED . . .

L
R
TORIES, INC.
JUNE 20, 1991
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
REFERENCE NO: 91 2190-3
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: SLUDGE SAMPLE FOR TCLP
MARKED: DRYING BED SLUDGE
RECEIVED ON: 6/12/91
ANALYSES:
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<.75
1,2-Dichloroethane
<.05
1,1-Dichloroethylene
<.07
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<.013
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
<.0008
Hexachlorobenzene
<.013
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
<.05
Hexachloroethane
<.3
Methyl ethyl ketone
<20
Nitrobenzene
<.2
Pentachlorophenol
<10
Pyridine
<.5
Tetrachloroethylene
<.07
Trichloroethylene
<.05
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<40
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<.2
Vinyl chloride
<.02
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
S �
;JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

L
R
LABORATORIES,
, INC.
DECEMBER 5, 1991
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
REFERENCE NO: 91 4108
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION:` CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: SLUDGE SAMPLE
MARKED: "S" DRYING BED SLUDGE
RECEIVED ON: 11/20/91
ANALYSES:
DATE
TIME
pH VALUE
7.5
11/26
1330
TOTAL SOLIDS
89.89%
12/2
1000
(PPM
AS RECEIVED)
Ca
445.00
11/27
1400
Cd
1.84
11/26
1537
CHLORIDES
48.09
11/21
0905
Cu
483.55
11/26
1537
K
120.00
11/27
1400
Mg
155.00
11/27
1400
NH3 as N
504
11/25
1530
NOz-NO3 as N
.09
11/27
0800
Na
550.00
11/27
1400
Ni
10.78
11/26
1400
Pb
7.69
11/26
1400
T-Cr
29.90
11/26
1537
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
62.00
11/25
1000
TOTAL SULFATES
<1
11/20
1600
TKN
14,700
11/25
0830
TOTAL NITROGEN
15,204
11/27
0800
Zn
334.35
11/26
1537
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
l
J
JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

a
d9
v
a
W
PAR PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
LABORATORIES, INC. P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
JUNE 28, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 2234
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF:
MARKED:
RECEIVED ON:
ANALYSES:
MONITORING WELL SAMPLES
AS LISTED
6/14/91
6!ELL K
SAMPLE 1
pH VALUE
TOTAL COLIFORM
L' klt.Ed- ?I ar Bev ml-
5.8
ABSENT
<'I , 0
of
2
6.8
ABSENT
(PPM)
-*2
3
6.9
ABSENT
<1.0
�3
4
6.8
ABSENT
<.100
NH3 as N
< . 1
< . 1
< . 1
< . 1
NO3 as N
<.05
<.05
<.05
<.05
TDS
168
241
153
106
ORTHOPHOSPHATE
<.05
.07
.08
.08
PHENOLICS
<.05
<.05
<.05
<.05
CHLORIDES
22.63
14.62
6.60
3.77
TOC
<1
<1
<1
<1
T-Cr
<.02
<.02
<.02
<.02
Cu
<.02
.04
<.02
<.02
Pb
.02
.02
.02
.02
Zn
.008
.054
.006
.026
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
C) --( o't

-$ GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
For additional forms please write or call: [phone] -
Facility Name �`���/ of . "'LL2wkli tolo_Tt' ����- l.' �;`;;1_ `;11i�i);\r`i County t.-4\"-IC-'m
Address i' f X `i I PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
2Sb iL Non-Dischargeyy L 000 2_X
Well Location �'�i1tL( }, V�zilu j rAefv\ NPDES
i TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
Well Identification Number X Well Depths Ft. (REQUIRED)
Well Diameter 4 t Sample (Sc reened)'Interval NO M E Ft. To Ft. _ Lagoon Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level 2,5) ft. below measuring point. (before sampling) — Spray Field — Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (LPP)
Measuring point is i I feet above land surface Land Application of Sludge
Other
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling ��''tt-.lt;�l� — Rotary Distributor
Field Analysis: pH 5-9 Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. o C Odor 'i.`rJ► Appearance L` I`'�Q
Date Sample Collected Lab Sample Analyzed GI I
-
r. \1C 2-O
Laboratory Name �'-� ��� �' {i ` +� I>r� .i1( Certification No.
0(a[;�iit, 1 i'; :SPti 1 l k mg/I NO2 as N mg/I Ni - Nickel mg/I
Coliform: MF Feral /100ml NO3 as N -ya mg/I Pb - Lead 02- mg/1
1.0
Coliform: MF Total (jV) /100m1
Dissolved Solids: Total mg/I
pH (when analyzed) units
TOC i P O mg/I
Chloride 2 Z . (z, 3 mg/I
Arsenic mg11
Grease and Oils
Hardness: Total
Phenol
Sulfate
` Specific Conductance
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
_ mg/I
uMhos
Phosphorus: Total as P
Al - Aluminum
mg/I Zn - Zinc - U06 mg/I
mg/I Pesticides/Herbicides. (Specify Compounds)
Ba - Barium mg/I
Ca - Calcium.
Cd - Cadmium
Chromium: Total C - G 2—
Cu - Copper C - 0 Z
mg/I
mg/I
g/I
g/I
Fe - Iron mg/I
Hg - Mercury rng/I
K - Potassium mg/I
Mg - Magnesium mg/I
Total Ammonia(NH3 ► NH4) l mg/I Mn - Manganese mg/I
TKN as N mg/I Na - Sodium mg/I
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE OR AUTHORIZED AGENT') AD TI�
Other (Specify)
NOTE:
Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
ug/I
ug/I
ug/1
ug/I
.ug/I
.ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
_.ug/I
* See back for Instructions.
"Submit blue, green, and yellow copies D1111 to address above.
GW-59 REV. 2/90

LiKUUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM uivision of environmental Management
a Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
For additional forms please write or call: [phone]
Facility Name 11`I C f kjIr.w-QJk4 VACT V /1JA: C'AQOL
Address t' ti. 1r'.iX f
Well Location _[MIL`I ly. IAkAt
Well Identification Number OVID ) Well Depth G Ft.
Well Diameter 2 iN Sample (Screened),Interval 20 Ft. To ZO Ft.
Depth to Water Level (:tf ft. below measuring point. (before sampling)
Measuring point is ' 04C feet above land surface
County
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Non -Discharge �J-10 GOO 32 8
NPDES NC 00 2 119 1
TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Lagoon
Spray Field
Land Application of Sludge
-- Septic Tank/Drain Field
Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (LPP)
c�
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling Z •J CiAij 0>js — Rotary Distributor Other
Field Analysis: pH Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. ° C Odor �00 Appearance CLIE
Date Sample Collected (c f 11-1%r11 Date Lab Sample Analyzed iG �i�1j I
Laboratory Name _K?. Certification No. N C 2-0
G�C11FtC)'tict✓►�ii�CE • C�"j mg/I NO2 as N mg/I Ni - Nickel m9 /I
Coliform: MF Fecal
/ 100ml
Coliform: MF Total < 1.0 /100ml
Dissolved Solids: Total 241 mg/I
pH (when analyzed)
TOC
units
NO 3 as N <, 0__S
Phosphorus: Total as P
mg/I
mg/I
Al - Aluminum mg/I
Ba - Barium - mg/I
m0/1 Ca - Calcium
Chloride 14" 1,,2 mg/I
Arsenic
Grease and Oils
Hardness: Total _
C 1.0
Cd - Cadmium
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I Chromium: Total < - U2 mg/I
mg/I Cu - Copper • d4- mg/I
mg/I Fe - Iron and/I
Phenol '4 *05 mg/I
Sulfate
mg/I
Specific Conductance uMhos
tvH "JV ) �•1 mg/I
TKN as N
mg/I
Hg - Mercury
mg/I
K - Potassium
mg/I
Mg - Magnesium
mg/I
Mn - Manganese
mg/I
Na - Sodium
mg/I
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (OR;AUTHORIZED AGENT-) ,bAT
GW-59 REV. 2/90
Pb - Lead ' ()Z mg/I
Zn - Zinc - 054 mg/I
Pesticides/Herbicides. (Specify Compounds)
Other (Specify)
NOTE:
Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
* See back for Instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies 21C to address above.

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM
For additional forms please write or call
Facility Name C' 1 1 �/ Of U L•N-1,11 UJltl l V , i -Mk: t'.NKTL � ANOAt-f
Address t' • Uk ,'
U- J.�kCAff, Q,C. 2401A
Well Location PMM I. O IN fA
Well Identification Number J31: 2— -fau • + Well Depth Ft.
EJXC OF 3
Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
[phone]
County C�AG1(A
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Non -Discharge
G�s0 3 1
NPDES A C oo .2 Its I
(REQUIRED
Well Diameter l� Sample (Screened) Interval 2_C) Ft. To LJ Ft. Lagoon — Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level 40F 1_ ft. below measuring point. (before sampling) Spray Field — Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (LPP)
Measuring point is NoNr_ feet above land surface Land Application of Sludge
Other
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling zllt�tS _ Rotary Distributor
Field Analysis: pH ��9 Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. o C Odor C�(s Appearance
Date Sample Collected /
Date Lab Sample Analyzed ( / 1Ci 1�� �
Laboratory Name L-N-b,Gt?t� ��Y C� - Certification No.
L }ICiOdbSiViAf~ •03 mg/I
Coliform: MF Feral /100m1
Coliform: MF Total 1'� C /100mi
Dissolved Solids: Total tS3 mg/I
PH (when analyzed) units
TOC < I.0 mg/I
Chloride �' 6 D mg/I
Arsenic mg/I
ON BEING MONITORED
Grease and Oils mg/I
Hardness: Total mg/I
Phenol �" �s mg/I
Sulfate mg/I
Specific Conductance uMhos
N H-4) C ' I mg/I
NO2 as N mg/I
NO 3 as N. "� ' Q� mg/I
Phosphorus: Total as P mg/I
Al - Aluminum mg/I
Ba - Barium
mg/I
Ca - Calcium
mg/I
Cd - Cadmium
mg/I
Chromium: Total < • 0-4
mg/I
Cu- Copper <' 02
mg/I
Ni -Nickel mg/I
Pb - Lead G 7— mg/I
Zn - Zinc - 00 (0 mg/I
Pesticides/Herbicides.(Specify Compounds)
Other (Specify)
vg/I
ug/I
ug/1
ug/I
ug/I
Fe - Iron
mg/I
ug/I
Hg - Mercury
mg/I
ug/I
K - Potassium
mg/I
ug/I
Mg - Magnesium
mg/I
.ug/I
Mn - Manganese mg/I
TKN as N mg/I Na - Sodium mg/I
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
J
i ��,� tit .!` • -• , . `' I,C !f %` . t •' `? , / �/ <:�.../
5
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (OR AUTHORIZED AGENT') DAT
1
GW-59 REV. 2/90
NOTE:
Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
* See back for Instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM Division ofEnvironmental Management
. Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
For additional forms please write or call: [phone]
Facility Name L 1�Y C;t= 4^.Z:�lt�>1T Li11JJ lr Affg'. (`A. 44U=�i�WCKfE1� County
Address Lj• : f;K Rat PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
:L 1.rl Non -Discharge WOW() �32_2 t
Well Location qk* 1=','1t_4 V.'..t Oulmm illy_%\ NPDES N Q= VC 2 11 1
Well Identification Number 03 t t IE t) Well Depths Ft. TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Well Diameter Sample (Screened), Interval 2-0 Ft. To 30 Ft. Lagoon .— Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level 20y--' ft. below measuring point. (before sampling) — Spray Field — Subsurface Low -Pressure
\
Measuring point is N '� feet above land surface Land Application of Sludge Piping (LPP)
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling �'' ' GAILLU5 — Rotary Distributor Other
Field Analysis: PH to-'?- Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. o C Odor CG 17 Appearance �L t
Date Sample Collected _ /i `I �'Z 1 Date Lab Sample Analyzed �41'4 41
Laboratory Name 12k Certification No. N C 2_Q
t(.3ALVbJ3 P14 A11' a S mg/I NO2 as N mg/I Ni - Nickel mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal /100ml NO g as N. <' 05 mg/I Pb - Lead mg/'I
Colifo6n: MF Total < 1-0 CK6 /100ml
Dissolved Solids: Total
mg/I
PH (when analyzed)
units
TOC C 1.0
mg/I
Chloride 3 • r 1 rj
mg/I
Arsenic
mg/I
Grease and Oils
Hardness: Total,
Phenol
<.Cs
Sulfate
Specific Conductance
NN3-N
`'. 3 FT4)
mg/I
Phosphorus: Total as P
mg/I
Al - Aluminum
mg/I
Ba - Barium
mg/I
Ca - Calcium
mg/I
Cd - Cadmium
mg/I
Chromium: Total -< . 02- mg/I
Cu- Copper < ' OZ mg/I
mg/I Fe - Iron mg/I
mg/I Hg - Mercury mg/I
K - Potassium mg/I
Mg - Magnesium mg/I
Mn - Manganese mg/I
TKN as N mg/I Na - Sodium mg/I
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
mg/I
uMhos
<- I mg/I
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (OR AUTHORIZED AGENT-) %DATI=
rVU_r,Q Pr -XI 7/On
Zn - Zinc - O 2 to mg/I
Pesticides/Herbicides. (Specify Compounds)
Other (Specify)
NOTE:
Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
.ug/I
* See back for Instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.

PAR Laboratories, Inc.
PAR
LABORATOR/ES,INC. 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
1 CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
l 704/588-8333
SEPTEMBER 30, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 3351
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: WATER SAMPLES
MARKED: SAMPLE #1 - RESIDENCE GROUNDWATER WELL
SAMPLE #2 - WELL IN FIELD D
SAMPLE #3 - WELL BETWEEN A & B
SAMPLE #4 - WELL IN A FIELD
RECEIVED ON: 9/18/91
ANALYSES: �l CI) (2) / 3)
SAMPLE 1 2 3 4 DATE TIME
TOTAL COLIFORM ABSENT ABSENT PRESENT PRESENT 9/19 0730
CULLED -PAR/UY Co4loor.L ( PPM )
NH3 as N <.1 .36 <.1 <.1 9/19 1600
NO3 as N <.05 <.05 <.05 <.05 9/19 0800
TDS 139 229 132 79 9/20 1600
0-VOy�= ORTHO PHOSPHORUS .16 <.05 <.05 .13 9/20 0800
PHENOLICS <.05 <.05 .16 .13 9/19 1415
CHLORIDES 2.62 6.82 3.14 3.67 9/24 1500
TOC <.5 <.5 <.5 <.5 9/19 0700
T-Cr <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 9/23 1533
Cu <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 9/23 1533
Pb <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 9/23 1533
Zn <.004 .039 <.004 .019 9/23 1533
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
ti L/•
OHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

) `:
r
Facility Name G KY OF
i
Well Identification Number( (95ILEgC.O Well Depth b5 Ft.
Well Diameter q J9 Sample (Screened) Interval N I Ft To Ft.
Depth to Water Level 2-5 F1" ft below measuring point (before sampling)
Measuring pant is II Ff R above land surface
Gallons of water pumpedbailed before sampling 20 !aA MS
PERMrr NUMBER: (REQU1RED2
Non -Discharge W W ef U b 3 Z 01
NPDES X960211 g 1
TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Lagoon Septic TwkDrain Field
Spray Field Subsurface Low -Pressure
V" Lard Application of Sludge FPm9 (Lpp)
Other
Rotary Distributor
Field Analysis: pH G, S ecific Conductance uMhos Temp. oC Odor xouE Appearance VERY
Date Sample 8 Date Lab Sample Analyzed (S/41 — 9/Z4/Q 1
Laboratory Name I E S IN C Certification No. Ne- Z�
C2B001401N091iop u5 .
mgA
Coliform: MF Fecal
/100ml
Coliform: MF Total < I - o
/100ml
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Dissolved Solids: Total 139-0
mg/l
pH (when analyzed)
units
TOC C-5
mgA
Chloride 2.- 6 2-
mg/I
Arsenic
mgA
Grease and Oils
mgA
Hardness: Total _mgA
Phenol < - os
mg/l
Sulfate
mgA
Specific Conductance
uMhos
T �i %6- Nl
mgA
TKN as N
mgA
Nitrite (NO 2) as N
mgA
Nitrate (NO 3) as N < - 05
mgA
Phosphorus: Total as I?
mgA
AI - Aluminum:
mgA
�- Ba - Barium
mgA
Ca - Calcium
mgA
Cd - Cadmium
mgA
Chromium: Total < . oz
mgA
Cu - Copper < - o Z
mgA
Fe - Iron
mgA
Hg - Mercury
mgA
K - Potassium
mgA
Mg - Magnesium
mgA
Mn - Manganese
mgA
Na - Sodium
mgA
Ni - Nickel
mg/I
Pb - Lead
mgA
Zn - Zinc
mgA
Pesticides/Herbicides
(Specify Compounds)
u g/I
ug/I
ug/I
Other (Specify Compounds and
Concentration units)
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. Note: Values should reflect dissolved and
colloidal concentrations. (see #2 on back)
See back for instructions.
Signature of Permittee (or PMhorized Agent*) ate •• submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.
GW-59 REV. 4/91

• GROUI\. LATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE RE RT FORM Groundwater Sectio,
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687 .1
For additional forms please write or call: [phone]
Facility Name %-J'11 VV OLLMONf1 Ikll_iLIEi 0' .4 IAL; =01JUAM15
Address PO -Box L 3I
BE Lr 0 fi` A.C. 28012
Well Location #1 ( El'LDi I ChAlLy 1; ( i1118 GkR9
Well Identification NumberOf (HEM-D) Well Depth -50_Ft.
Well Diameter Z W Sample (ScreenedY Interval.. Ft. ToR_Ft.
Depth to Water Level • Jt� ft. below measuring point. (before sampling)
Measuring point is 904 E feet above land surface
6 © /—" I t %A C
County fa.hg? l
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED) VE Non -Discharge LA Q0G 32g' 1
DES
ERATION BEING MONITORED
QUIRED
Lagoon
Spray Field
Land Application of Sludge
Other
Septic' Tank/Drain Field
Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (LPP)
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling 1.1 rt — 1-- " 11......
Field Analysis: pH _ • S Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. o C Odor Appearance - &LLD QD
pasa
Date Sample Collected _T141 Date Lab Sample Analyzed 4
pf I A f
Laboratory Name TAR LA'Qi A� mrLs Trr _ Certification No. 11G 2 O
(ME)bRfHaPFIQS.pWauS L.OS ma/I NO, as N mg/I Ni - Nickel mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal �r /100ml
Coliform: MF Total < �,O C�� /100ml
Dissolved Solids: Total�9 mg/I
pH (when analyzed)
units
TOC -5 mg/I
Chloride �.SZ mg/I
Arsenic
Grease and Oils
Hardness: Total .
.NO 3 as N mg/I
Phosphorus: Total as P
Al - Aluminum
mg/I
mg/I
Ba - Barium mg/I
Ca - Calcium mg/I
Cd - Cadmium
mg/I
mg/I Chromium: Total 4r02 mg/I
mg/I Cu - Copper "- - 0Z mg/I
mg/I Fe - Iron
Phenol G • V.5 mg/I
Sulfate
mg/I
Specific Conductance uMhos
X63-Ai ' 3� mg/I
TKN as N
Hg - Mercury _
K - Potassium_
Mg - Magnesium
Mn - Manganese
mg/I Na - Sodium
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (O AUTHORIZED AGENT*) DATE
A
mg/I
.mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
Pb - Lead -<_• 02- mg/I
Zn - Zinc .032 mg/I
Pesticides/Herbicides. (Spec ify Compounds)
Other (Specify)
NOTE:
Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
.ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
..ug/I
* See back for Instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.
GW-59 REV. 2/90

Septic Tank/Drain Field
Subsurface Low -Pressure
Piping (LPP)
Other
Appearance C K EA
mg/I
3 s mg/I Pb - Lead --*' - 6,7
Coliform: MF Total .4/100m1 Phosphorus: Total as P < rng/I
mg/I Zn - Zinc _ - a Dissolved Solids: Total _��7_ mg/l Al - Aluminum --..I Q mg/I
PH (when analyzed)
units
TOC _
mg/I
Chloride 3• I
mg/I
Arsenic
mg/I
Grease and Oils
mg/I
Hardness: Total
mg/I
Phenol 1
mg/I
Sulfate
mg/I
Specific Conductance
uMhos
M. I
�"-�— mg/I
TKN as N
Groundwater SectlL.r
P.O. Box 27687
For additional forms please write or call: Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
[phone]
Facility Name F
Lnu
Address �. 0. �1�µ
County . VA sr<n u
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Non -Discharge W(Tom 3 z9"it Well Location %I� ^^ 1
NPDF"
Well Identification Numbers TYPE OF Ot
Well Depth��_Ft, (REQUfRE[
Well Diameter I u Sample (Screened) Interval
1 Ft. To _ 3A Ft. _ Lagoon
Depth to Water Level _ I ( it below
OPERATION BEING MO
measuring point. (before sampling.) — Spray Field
Measuring point is 01 feet above land surface
�L Gallons of water pumped/bailed before samplingRotary Distributor
Land Application of Sludge
�,�(
Field Analysis: pH _f je n Specific Conductance .
Date Sample Collected ��'q ( uMhos Temp. ° C OdorlJa S�
Date Lab Sample Analyzed q //8 /q 1 — 9 dz� �
Laboratory Name _�AQ �AP�ef2A�inq.� 'f•��
09D Certification No. kc-x�
Coliform: MF Fecal
mg/I NO2 as N mg/I Ni - Nickel
/100m1 NO a N G a5
Ba - Barium mg/I
Ca - Calcium mg/I
Cd - Cadmium
mg/I
Chromium: Total <- 02- mg/I
Cu- Copper < • 62-
mg/I
Fe - Iron
M
Hg - Mercury g/I
K - Potassium g/I
Mg - Magnesium mg/I
Mn - Manganese
mg/I Na - Sodium
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (OR THORIZED AGENT*) fr a,2 Qd
TE
GW-59 REV. 2/90
Pesticides/Herbicides (Specify Compounds)
ug/I
ug/I
ug/l
Other (Specify) ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
.ug/I
.mg/I
ffO E-
mg/I Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
* See back for Instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.

` • GROUNUWATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM Division of Environmental Ma...,ge
Groundwater Section
11
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
For additional forms please write or call: [phone]
Facility Name Q f3 OF LA 0UJ' WitdP4_AM'
Non L GiAgDAt Eli
County GA► rh
Address F'o -iOY 4z,
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
TE omrf 1 .0 2Rcot ?
Non -Discharge t+>;i g Ono
3�1 8
Well Location EWL`I B. &JUMq EARA
NPDES KC 002119,1
Well Identification Number � (FIELD Al
Well Depth _20 Ft.
TYPE DISPOSAL OPERATION
(REQUUIRED)
BEING MONITORED
Well Diameter 2,1)1 Sample (Screened)
Interval 12-_ Ft. To 30 Ft.
Lagoon
— Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level I Z ft. below measuring point. (before sampling)
Spray Field
_ Subsurface Low -Pressure
/
Sludge
Piping (LPP)
Measuring point is AORE feet above land surface
v Land Application of
LL11 ��
O iher
Gallons of water pumped/balled before sampling
��
�S hLLOnS
_ Rotary Distributor
Field Analysis: pH 16 Specific Conductance uMhos Temp.
o C Odor UQ S F LL
Appearance CIyA2
Date Sample Collected 9/Ikla11
Date Lab Sample Analyzed
9�18 �q I — 9��4-/4i9
Laboratory Name TAP"-U490 A'%aUEs :TqC..
Certification No. Xc 20
G99B f RAO B4 5VNol S • 13 mg/I
NO2 as N
mg/I Ni - Nickel
mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal /100ml
NO3 as N -.4•0S
mg/I Pb - Lead
_mg/I
//
Coliform: MF Total < IF `T—/100ml
Phosphorus: Total as P
mg/I Zn - Zinc
_mg/I
Dissolved Solids: Total 17910 mg/I
Al - Aluminum
mg/I Pesticides/Herbicides
(Specify Compounds)
PH (when analyzed) units
Ba - Barium
mg/I
ug/I
TOC '< • S mg/I
Ca - Calcium
mg/I
ug/I
Chloride mg/I
Cd - Cadmium
mg/I
ug/I
Arsenic mg/I
Chromium: Total
mg/I Other (Specify)
ug/I
Grease and Oils mg/I
Cu- Copper
mg/I
ug/I
Hardness: Total mg/I
Fe - Iron
mg/I
ug/I
Phenol • 13 mg/I
Hg - Mercury
mg/I
ug/I
Sulfate mg/I
K - Potassium
mg/I
ug/I
Specific Conductance uMhos
Mg - Magnesium
mg/I
ug/I
NH3-rr
mg/I
Mn - Manganese
mg/I
NOTE:
TKN as N mg/I
Na - Sodium
mg/I Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF,PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT`) ��
c
r_\A/ Cn MCA/ -
See * See back for Instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.

PARPAR Laboratories, Inc.
LABORATORIES, 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
DECEMBER 19, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 4105
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
MARKED: AS LISTED
RECEIVED ON: 11/20/91
ANALYSES:
SAMPLE X 1 2 3 DATE TIME
TOTAL COLIFORM PRESENT PRESENT PRESENT PRESENT 11/21 0900
(PPM)
NH3 as N
<.1
<.1
<.1
<.1
11/22
1515
NO3 as N
<.05
<.05
<.05
<.05
11/21
1300
TDS
145
230
128
87
11/21
0830
ORTHO PHOSPHORUS
.17
<.05
.11
.09
11/21
0830
PHENOLICS
<.05
<.05
<.05
<.05
11/23
0815
CHLORIDES
19.33
6.12
2.82
3.77
11/21
0905
TOC
<.5
<.5
<.5
<.5
12/11
0600
Ag
<.004
<.004
<.004
<.004
11/22
0933
Cu
<.02
<.02
<.02
<.02
11/22
0933
Pb
<.02
<.02
<.02
<.02
11/22
0933
T-Cr
<.02
<.02
<.02
<.02
11/22
0933
Zn
<.004
.017
<.004
<.004
11/22
0933
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
.
a I
JOHNS. RICE
"LABORATORY DIRECTOR

ffl1�_,#tGjJOU1 NATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE RL )RT FORM
Facility Name Li i `I (>i is I` L.I{c Lif (!'(I'; ►- I).! ri f'
Address
llAll
Well Location LAAL'i l:. (,Vivv ili tt
For additional forms please write or call:
utvimon of tnvuonmentai m,
Groundwater Sectlo.
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611 7687
[phone]
County %A ;-(1,,4
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Non -Discharge
NPDES (' ' C II `SI
X � f�
Well Identification Number rSliWell Depth=,
Ft.
TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED(REQUIRED)
Well Diameter f� Sample (Screened) -interval NOd Ft. To
Ft.
— La goon Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level 25F1' ft. below measuring point. (before sampling)
— Spray Field — Subsurface Low -Pressure
Measuring point is I ff feet above land surface
—.L / Piping (LPP)
Land Application of Sludge
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling '' G.�11t',�
Rotary Distributor Other
Field Analysis: pH 'S•G Specific Conductance uMhos
Temp. I(- °C Odor V, F Appearance�1
Date Sample Collected I1f� - i I Date Lab Sample
Analyzed - I Ill . ° /f-,i 1
64, Laboratory Name Lt. L1t)C. t,,IL 5 rtdC:-
Certification No. NC 2Q
Isom� - H mg/I NO2 as N
mg/I Ni - Nickel mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal /100ml NO3 as N- • o=>
mg/I Pb - Lead C.Z mg/I
Coliform: MF Total J;Zkfa:`t>' /100ml Phosphorus: Total as P
mg/I Zn - Zinc mg/I
Dissolved Solids: Total 14:, mg/ -I Al - Aluminum
mg/I Pesticides/Herbicides (Specify Compounds)
PH (when analyzed) units
TOC mg/I
Chloride
Arsenic
Grease and Oils
mg/I
mg/I
Ba - Barium mg/I
Ca - Calcium
Cd - Cadmium
Chromium: Total .4� - c:
mg/I Cu - Copper --- . b2_
Hardness: Total mg/I
Phenol < . C°!; mg/I
Sulfate
Specific Conductance
Total Ammonia(NH3 # NH 4)
TKN as N
_ mg/I
uMhos
mg/I
mg/I
Fe - Iron
Hg - Mercury
mg/I
mg/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
mg/I Other (Specify) ug/I
mg/I , f(' -.Y <- I nug/I
mg/I I! f < . r.r nug/I
g/I
K - Potassium mg/I
Mg - Magnesium mg/I
Mn - Manganese mg/I
Na - Sodium mg/I
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (OR;AUTHORIZED AGENT') A
ug/I
ug/I
.ug/I
NOTE:
Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
* See back for Instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.
GW-59 REV. 2/90

VI/V4114 \VPlp1 JpVll
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
For additional forms please write or call: [phone]
FacilityName i'_i'tY (-' )1I-AWq! iJ.IJ°'r'� �/ ' ' I ,
i � � ��(.�� : oaf ()� `��L�Ir--F-! r' County ��-\� f_ u
Address
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
AC Non -Discharge -P ; ;i :( ,1
Well Location f .111L%j 1' (!(t l %.fir NPDES �'
Well Identification Number I It to.1. Well Depth (' Ft TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
(REQUIRED)
Well Diameter fg Sample (Screened) -interval ZC Ft. To Ft. _ Lagoon Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level __ 2•C'r-r ft. below measuring point. (before sampling) — sprayRM Subsurface Low -Pressure
Measuring point is NN feet above land surface Land Application of Sludge Piping (LPP)
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling �•� C�_-\LL( k(' _ Rotary Distributor other
Field Analysis: pH rr• 1 Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. I: i oC Odor t;E Appearance-Lk1*V, I I lilt
Date Sample Collected f 1lZc.•Date Lab Sample.Analyzed 11y
Laboratory Name 1 Lt~ 1_.:', E1-4 i t `! f\(' . Certification No.
COPk' fit;5itI'%
r-(E,
mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal
/100ml
Coliform: MF Total
)kk—'t tit'
/100ml
Dissolved Solids: Total Z�r mg/I
pH (when analyzed)
units
TOC
< -
mg/I
Chloride
fn- iZ
mg/I
Arsenic
mg/I
Grease and Oils
Hardness: Total
Phenol
Sulfate
Specific Conductance
NO2 as N
mg/I
NO 3 as N
mg/I
Phosphorus: Total as P
mg/I
Al - Aluminum
mg/I
Ba - Barium
mg/I
Ca - Calcium.
Cd - Cadmium
Chromium: Total
mg/I Cu- Copper
mg/I Fe - Iron
C • ` mg/I Hg - Mercury _
mg/I K - Potassium_
uMhos Mg - Magnesium
Total Ammonia(NH3 • NH 4)
TKN as N
mg/I
mg/I
Mn - Manganese
Na - Sodium
CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (OR AUTHORIZED AGENT') DATE
mg/I
mg/I
mg/1
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
'na/I
Ni - Nickel
mg/I
Pb - Lead - c mg/I
Zn - Zinc - I `l mg/I
Pesticides/Herbicides (Specify Compounds)
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
Other (Specify) ug/I
:VEI=•-d <_ 1 lug/I
Li .Ng/I
.i
.mg/I
NOTE:
mg/I Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
ug/I
ug/I
.ug/I
* See back for Instructions.
*` Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.
GW-59 REV. 2/90

4
uivision of tnvironrnenuai ma
C;ROUNV.JATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REk �RT FORM Groundwater Sectloh :. .
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611 7687
For additional forms please write or call: [phone]
i
(!
Facility Name County
I ( k I, y ' PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Address X
;w'ut-kif ;C oL Non -Discharge
Well Location
-It11-11 L(.ilvN' PE FPDISPOSALDES OPERATION B
#12 f O EING MONITORED
/ �
Well Identification Number I � t t iF 1•1j� �� f !- , Well Depth •_'� t Ft. (R (REQUIRED)
Well Diameter 2 Sample (Screened) Interval Ir` Ft. To ,�C Ft. Lagoon — Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level 1('.. rr ft. below measuring point. (before sampling) — Spray Field — Subsurface Low -Pressure
9 Piping (LPP)
Measuring point is feet above land surface Land Application of sludge
Other
`
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling C L, ,( L, N Rotary Distributor
•` I Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. V4 o C Odor Sf '� i Appearance (_-
L.r=;lk
Field Analysis: pH P
Date Sample Collected I I r ( Date Lab Sample Analyzed
Laboratory Name I ��►' 1L't�'.'�t i' f E' 7i;C - Certification No.
C�iUul'iirS(1►rE u; I! mg/I NO as N mg/I Ni -Nickel mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal /100m1 NO3 as N t� mg/I Pb - Lead �' L mg/I
Coliform: MF Total l"t;r si /100ml Phosphorus: Total as P mg/I Zn - Zinc
LA mg/I
i Z Al -Aluminum mg/I Pesticides/Herbicides (Specify Compounds)
D I d S I'ds Total mg/I
tsso ve o I
pH (when analyzed) units
TOC G ' r mg/I
Chloride
Arsenic
Grease -and Oils
Hardness: Total
Phenol
Sulfate
Specific Conductance
2 - CG mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
uMhos
Ba - Barium —
Ca - Calcium.
Cd - Cadmium
Chromium: Total
Cu - Copper
Fe - Iron
Hg - Mercury
K - Potassium_
Mg - Magnesium
Total Ammonia(NH3 • NH 4) mg/I Mn - Manganese
TKN as N mg/I Na - Sodium
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE'(OR AUTHORIZED AGENT-) DATE
- C'L
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
.mg/I
mg/I
.mg/I
mg/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
Other (Specify) ug/I
Nil .
ug/I
Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
ug/I
ug/I
See back for Instructions.
•� Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.
f-IAi r-n EMI 010n

L
Division of Environmental f&
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REVORT FORM Groundwater Section
P.O. Box 27687 E
Raleigh, NC 27611 7687 '
For additional forms please write or call: [phone]
r j..f`l i t 1 Lllr' 1 ! t;t: r(I` ;\•1'ti ,` • \i • 1 _.i .��11.1 �t c t;
Facility Name
County I l [
�` (f �)
PERMIT NUMBER: (REQUIRED)
Address
Non -Discharge
Well Location 1AHLLi I•. (�(+ia;\,i t.'•E._�l
NPDES
TYPE OF DISPOSAL OPERATION BEING MONITORED
l
kj-i) rl Depth%L Ft.
Well Identification Number s Well
(REQUIRED) L
Well Diameter 2 I� '� �
Sample (Screened) Interval 1 �: --Ft. To - ;(; Ft.
_ Lagoon — Septic Tank/Drain Field
Depth to Water Level ft. below measuringpoint. (before sampling)
— Spray Field — subsurface Low -Pressure
- Piping (LPP)
Measuring point is �_ feet above land surface
IZ Land Application of Sludge
other
Gallons of water pumped/bailed before sampling to 1l Ll•,:�
Rotary Distributor
Field Analysis: pH L Specific Conductance uMhos Temp. %-; o C Odor Appearance
Date Sample Collected I / ! f Date Lab Sample Analyzed
Laboratory Name t f` ('� t / 1�11; t' IL r. Certification No.
Co61( If�`_,t•ik i'tr� • G`) mg/l NO2 as N
mg/I Ni - Nickel mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal /100ml NO 3 as N
L 2. . c-•
mg/I Pb - Lead mg/I
Coliform: MF Total jKF..'.tq /100m1 Phosphorus: Total as P
mg/I Zn - Zinc �'`� mg/I
Dissolved Solids: Total L! • mg/I Al - Aluminum
mg/1 Pesticides/Herbicides (Specify Compounds)
H (when anal zed) units Ba - Barium
mg/I ug/I
p y
TOC
mg/I Ca - Calcium
Chloride , j j
mg/I
Arsenic
mg/I
Grease and Oils
mg/I
Hardness: Total
mg/I
Phenol ' �-'
mg/I
Sulfate
mg/I
Specific Conductance
uMhos
Cd - Cadmium —
Chromium: Total
Cu - Copper
Fe - Iron
Hg - Mercury
K - Potassium_
Mg - Magnesium
Total Ammonia(NH3 * NH 4) mg/I Mn - Manganese
TKN as N mg/I Na - Sodium
I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE (OR AUTHORIZED AGENT`) DATE
!_- ._
G
mg/I ug/I
m g /I ug/1
mg/l Other (Specify) ug/I
mg/I f1' - v <' i lug/I
mg/I ("_c � �a�g/I
mg/I
ug/I
.mg/I ug/I
mg/I ug/I
.mg/I OT .
mg /I Values should reflect dissolved concentrations
(See #2. on reverse)
' See back for instructions.
** Submit blue, green, and yellow copies only to address above.

t
L
RORIES, INC.
DECEMBER 4, 1991
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
REFERENCE NO: 91 4106-1 AMENDED
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: GROUNDWATER SAMPLES FOR METHOD 6230D
MARKED: 11/20/91 & AS LISTED
RECEIVED ON: 11/20/91
ANALYSES:
SAMPLE
X 1 2 3
(PPB)
Bromobenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Bromochloromethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Bromodichloromethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Bromoform
<1
<1
<1
<1
Carbon tetrachloride
<1
<1
<1
<1
Chlorobenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Chlorocyclohexane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1-Chlorocyclohexane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Chloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
2-Chloroethylethyl ether
<1
<1
<1
<1
Chloromethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
2-Chlorotoluene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Dibromochloromethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2-Dibromoethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Dibromomethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
CONTINUED . . .

LPAPAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
ATORIES. INC. P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
DECEMBER 4, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 4106-2 AMENDED
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: GROUNDWATER SAMPLES FOR METHOD 6230D
MARKED: 11/20/91 & AS LISTED
RECEIVED ON: 11/20/91
ANALYSES:
SAMPLE X 1 2 3
(PPB)
Dichlorodifluoromethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1-Dichloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2-Dichloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1-Dichloroethene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2-Dichloroethene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2-Dichloropropane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,3-Dichloropropane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1-Dichloropropene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Methylene chloride
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Tetrachloroethene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Trichloroethene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Trichlorofluoromethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Vinyl chloride
<1
<1
<1
<1
CONTINUED . . .

PARPAR Laboratories, Inc.
LABORATORIES, 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
DECEMBER 4, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 4106-3
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. O. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: GROUNDWATER SAMPLES FOR METHOD 6230D
MARKED: 11/20/91 & AS LISTED
RECEIVED ON: 11/20/91
ANALYSES:
SAMPLE X 1 2 3
(PPB)
Bromomethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
<1
<1
<1
<1
2,2-Dichloropropane
<1
<1
<1
<1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethane
<1
<1
<1
<1
Chloroform
<1
<1
<1
<1
Benzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Toluene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Ethylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
m-Xylene
<1
<1
<1
<1
p-Xylene
<1
<1
<1
<1
o-Xylene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Styrene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Isopropylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
N-Propylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
CONTINUED .

Q
RRATORIES, INC.
DECEMBER 4, 1991
PAR Laboratories, Inc.
2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483 .
704/588-8333
REFERENCE NO: 91 4106-4
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: GROUNDWATER SAMPLES FOR METHOD 6230D
MARKED: 11/20/91 & AS LISTED
RECEIVED ON: 11/20/91
ANALYSES:
SAMPLE
X
1
2
3
(PPB)
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
4-Chlorotoluene
<1
<1
<1
<1
tert-Butylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
sec-Butylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
p-Isopropyltoluene
<1
<1
<1
<1
n-Butylbenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Hexachlorobutadiene
<1
<1
<1
<1
Naphthalene
<1
<1
<1
<1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
<1
<1
<1
<1
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
/ JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR

r
PARPAR Laboratories, Inc.
LABORATORIES, INC. 2217 GRAHAM PARK DRIVE
P.O. BOX 411483
CHARLOTTE, NC 28241-1483
704/588-8333
DECEMBER 19, 1991
REFERENCE NO: 91 4261
MADE FOR: CITY OF BELMONT
P. 0. BOX 431
BELMONT, NC 28012
ATTENTION: CAROL STANDAFER
ANALYSES OF: GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
MARKED: AS LISTED
RECEIVED ON: 12/6/91
ANALYSES:
SAMPLE X 1 2
TOTAL COLIFORM PRESENT PRESENT PRESENT
3 DATE TIME
PRESENT 12/6 1540
/ NIS 15 A We 'DID -f0 Touzi-E CmcK IsT - auurs ou N2.o f q I
ON IZ/Wq I U E L pg f ' -Illcx To '(Ne �AIZM A4P CNLoRwMA,, ED ' "e 1, u" . WF Aso
&F,r,'fEv A SAMPLE Af '(HE '�ES{DEUCG AAD TESTED Von FUGAL- CoLJFoaat Wrrjj
xo ;rECALS <440WAc i:r4AA. ENE Tgir.0" s
tu
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
PAR LABORATORIES, INC.
JOHN S. RICE
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
-11

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. W. E. Nichols
City of Mount Holly
Post Office Box 406
Mount Holly, North Carolina 28210
Dear Mr. Nichols:
11kF11W,A
• •
NCDENR
,A" -
NORTH CA�20L�N°q;LJEF?FsliNT OF
ENVIRONMENT`AND NATURAL[R'�Pf.3CES
September 21, 1999
Subject: Applications No. WQ0001863
City of Mt. Holly
Sludge -Land Application
Gaston County
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on September 20, 1999. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
Your project has been assigned to Ms. Joni Cardin for a detailed. engineering review. Should there be
any questions concerning your project, the review will contact you with a request for additional information.
Be aware. that the Division's Regional Office, copied below; must provide recommendations from the,
Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final action by the division.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Joni Cardin at 919/733-5083 ext. 509. If the engineer is
unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRES ON
THIS PROJECT.
Since
rely,
�
Mr. Kim H. Colson, P. .
Supervisor, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:Ioo r,illeaRegaonalOfiice;,�Water;Qualityr
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes_No_X
. If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water ,Quality .Section
Attention: Ms.'Dianne Thomas
.Mooresville# 99-139
Date: October :14,1999
NON -DISCHARGE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
COUNTY: rGaston
Permit No. WQ0001863
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: City of Mt. Holly
Post Office Box 406
Mount Holly,.NC 28210
2. Date of Investigation: October 12, 1999
3. Report Prepared By: Ellen Huffman
4. Person(s) Contacted and Telephone Number: BIO NOMIC (Chris Edmonds).(704) 529-
0000
5. Directions to Site(s): Site map for -each field is located in the permit package.
6. Size (land permitted for application): 288.4 acres
This application reflects a reduction of acreage from the last:permit; however, this acreage
is still sufficient for the amount -of -residuals produced annually.
7. Topography (relationship to 100-year flood plain included): 'Sites in this renewal are not in
or near a.100-year flood plain. USGS maps showing respective fields are included in the
permit package.
8. Buffer conflicts with location of nearest dwelling and water supply well: Yes X No
See part IV
Page 1

9. Watershed Stream Basin Information for land application sites:
a. Watershed Classification: C, WS-IV
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba and 03 08 36
C. Distance to surface water from disposal system: N/A
PART H - DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Residuals Volume: 630 dry tons per year combined, from water and wastewater
Treatment plant residuals
b. Types and quantities of wastewater: 60% Industrial 40% domestic
c. Volume of wastewater residual storage available: 1.6 million gallons in above ground
storage tanks. Estimated days of storage: 120 days
d. Volume of water treatment residuals: 2 million gallons in an earthen lagoon
Estimated days of storage available: 1460 days
2. Wastewater Treatment Facilities
a. Current permitted capacity of the facility: 4.0 MGD
b. Average daily flow of the facility: 2.0 MGD
C. Description of existing wastewater treatment facilities: The Mt. Holly wastewater
Treatment Plant consists of bar screens, grit chambers, flow equalization basin,
aeration basins with mechanical aeration, .secondary clarifiers, dual chlorine contact
chambers, dual aerated sludge .tanks with diffused air, dual non -aerated sludge
holding tanks, and unused sand drying beds. The sludge produced is class B lime
stabilized before land application occurs.
d. Description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
3. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: The liquid residuals are loaded at the
plant into tanker trucks and hauled to the land application site and applied.
4. Treatment plant classification: Grade IV Biological Water Pollution Control System
Page 2

5. SIC Code(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s) 01
Primary:01 Secondary:
Main Treatment Unit Code: 02003
PART III - -OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring requests: N/A
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: N/A
4. Other Special Items: N/A
PART IV EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This application is a request for renewal of an existing land application .permit. This
application reflects -a reduction, of acreage from the last -permit. This reduced.acreage is still
sufficient for .the amount of residuals produced annually. MRO staffrecommends that a well
serving the Roy Stillwell house between field # 1 and 42 be buffered appropriately. Killian
Farm field # 3 is unsuitable for land application because there is no established grass. It can
be used only after trees.and scrub are removed and.a suitable ground cover of pasture grass
is established.
After reviewing the permit renewal application, this Office recommends issuing .the subject
permit as long as the recommended changes are made.
Signature of Re Preparer
Water Qual' egional Supervisor
LVz1___.7z1z9' -
Date
Page 3

A" Ile>NWII OQ,'
BIO-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
Specializing in .today's needs for environmental protection.
516 Roundtree Road • Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
P 7���O
Application Site Renewal
O
p n��
Mt. Holly, NC 'o�
September, 1999
Permit No. WQ0001863
Prepared For The City of Mt. Holly By
Bio-Nomic Services, Inc.
A Carylon Company

l
BIO-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
I Specializing in today's needs for environmental protection.
516 Roundtree Road • Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
I
September 15, 1999
NC DENR
Permits and Engineering Unit
1617 Mail Service Center Rd
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
I
Attention: Mr. Kim Colson
Reference: Renewal of Permit WQ0001863
City of Mt Holly Sludge Management Program
Dear Mr. Colson:
Bio-Nomic Services, Inc. is under contract with the City of Mt holly to manage
their sludge disposal program. Bio-Nomic Services, Inc. wishes to renew the existing
permit. No additional sites have been added.
Your prompt attention in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Please contact
us immediately if you require additional information in the review of the permit renewal.
Sincerely,
Christopher Edmonds
Agronomist
A Carylon Company

0 BIO-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
Specializing in today's needs for environmental protection.
516 Roundtree Road *Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 - [phone] - Fax [phone]
CONTENTS
MT. HOLLY - RENEWAL
SEPTEMBER 1999
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
A. FRONT SECTION
1. FARMER - LAND OWNER - FIELD SUMMARY
2. NCDEHNR FORMS
3. AGRONOMIST REPORT
4. TABLE: FIVE YEAR ADJUSTED PAN
B. BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS AND TCLP
C. FARM SITES
1. GARY DUCKWORTH FARM: GD
2. ROY STILWELL FARM: MH-1
3. CHARLIE M. KILLIAN FARM: MH-2
4. GARY NEAL ALLEN FARM: MH-3
D. SOILS INFORMATION
PERMIT RENEWAL PREPARED FOR MT. HOLLY, NC BY BIO-NOMIC
SERVICES, INC, CHARLOTTE, NC
A Carylon Company

MT. HOLLY, NC - RENEWAL
SEPTEMBER 1999
FARMER - LANDOWNER - FIELD SUNIMARY
FARMER FIELD
LANDOWNER
Gary Duckworth GD-1
N/A
GD-2
N/A
GD-3
NIA
GD-4
N/A
GD-5
N/A
GD-6
N/A
GD-7
N/A
GD-8
N/A
GD-9
N/A
KGmm
Roy Stilwell MHl-1 Dennis D. Sifford
MHl-2 i Dennis D. Sifford
TOTAL
Charlie M. Killian Sr. MH2-1
MH2-2
NM-3
NM-4
NM-5
NM-6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Charlie Killian Sr.
& Melanie Jones
Charlie Killian Sr
& Charlie Killian Jr.
TOTAL
ACRES
GROSS
NET
22.3
21.1
14.1
11.6
4.0
3.1
7.1
6.2
28.7
20.4
5.4
2.2
3.8
3.8
10.5
10.5
11.9
11.9
107.8
90.8
23.3
16.6
28.2
28.2
51.5
44.8
38.1
33.3
31.4
30.1
19.6
19.6
12.6
12.3
17.4
16.7
16.2
15.2
135.3
127.2
Continued....

MT. HOLLY, NC - RENEWAL
SEPTEMBER 1999
FARMER - LANDOWNER - FIELD SUMMARY: PAGE 2
ACRES
FARMER FIELD LANDOWNER GROSS NET
Gary Neal Allen MH3-1 N/A 14.0 14.0
MH3-2 N/A 11.6 11.6
TOTAL 25.6 25.6
GRAND TOTAL 320.2 288.4

State of North Carolina
�-
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources 4,
Division of Environmental Management ,A
"-
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 0 b
-
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGIII'AI,) �
-1 r0
LAND APPLICATION OF OTHER RESIDUAL SOLIDS 1 cp TO
This application is inte4adcd for facilities which axe EXEMPT from 40 CFR Pan 50
1. GENERAL INFORMA;<'ION:
1.
Applicants name (please specifv the name of the municipality, eorpomdon, individual, etc.):
CITY OF MOUNT HOLLY
_ 2.
I
Print Owners or Signing Official's name and title (the, person wbo !,legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
(i
w_E NICHOLS
3.
Mailing address: P.O. BOX 406
-�
City: MT. HOLLY State: NC Zip; 28210
II
Telepbone Number: ( 704 ) 8 2 2- 2 9 3 3
4.
Application Date: 8/ 2 9/ 9 9
5.
Fee Submitted: S 0 (The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).)
6.
Specify whether these residuals will be laud applied to: X agricultural lands, forest, public contact sites.
reclamation sites; (Please be advised, if these residuals will be distributed for lawn or home garden use, the
"DISTRIBUTION
application for the OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS" should be completed-radier than this application.)
7.
If the alterative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as def red under 40 C..rR Pan 503, please complete the
"SURFAr-Z
application titled DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals :r
a surface impoundment or disposal Lbru landfilling. Explain:
8. For Class B Residuals (or Class A Residuals to be land applied on a dedicated site), please specify the number of acres on
which rrsidual solids are to be land applicd under the authority of this permit:
proposed in this application: 2 8 8 .4 acres; total (current and proposed): 288.4
_acres
9. Couuty(ies) where residuals will be land applied: _(�ASTONCOTTVTV
LINCOLN COUNTY
11. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. App)ication No. (will be completed by DF-M):
2. Specify wherber project is: new; _X renewal'; modification
ror renewals, complete all sections included in the application, in addition, please submit updated cumulative loadings
for the ten (10) pollutants and updated owner's agreement Por9,Xh site.
If this application is being submitted as a result of a renews-1 or modification to an existing permit, list die existing ptrrnit
nurnbcr_WQ0001863 and itc issue date JUNE 291 1995
FORM: LAORS 02/95 page 1 of 18

i III. FACILITY ]INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1
Name of facility where residuals are generated or
€ prepared: MT. HOLLY Wi fir'& EQUILIBRIUM BASIN
j{ 2.
Facility permit number: NC 0 0 8 4 6 8 9 ; facility permit holder. CITY OF MT HOLLY
3.
Specify whether facility in Section III. l is owned by: federal; private; state; __X__ brat government.
4.
Specify facility design flow: _ 4GD; facility average daily flow: 2D;
Type of residual storage: above
g ground storase tank
Volume of residual storage: 1.5 mi 1 1 i nn 1
dal nnc r•nmhi ned
L '
Length of residuals storage at facility: 120 days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units th
at
are separate from hutment system. i e. not in clarifiers,
aeration basins, etc.);
i
Maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 120 days.
i --
Estimated volume of residuals: 630 comb i n e d(dry tons/yr.)"
S.
Are there any other storage facilities, other than the above, currently on site: Yes, X No.
i J
If Yes„please identify:
6.
Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): W • E . NICHOLS
- 7.
Facility contact's telephone number: ( 704 _) 8 2 2— 2 9 41
8.
!i
Location of treatment facility: NC State; GA STON County
9. Mailing address:
MT. HOLLY, NC 28120
10. Latitude: 35 —15 t— 5 5 �Longitude; 8 f— 0 0 r— "
11. Specify the source of the residuals treatment of water (alum sludges); hutment of industrial wastewater
(100% industrial residuals); —_ treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater (please specify
appropriate percentages of — 6 0 % industrial wastewater. 4 0 % domestic wastewater);
other (explain):
- Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
12. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? X Yes; No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40
CFR 403.8. to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
I" by the appropriate federal or State autbority)
TV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Haaardous Waste (RCRA) Detmmination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those nmiduals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.337 Yes; _ x No. if Yes,
list the number(s):
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 2 of 18

--; III. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
_ _! 1. Name of facility wbere residuals are generated or prepared; MT . HOLLY yW PP
�
2. Facility permit number: NC 0 0 21 15 6 ; facllit � y permit holder: CITY OF MT. HOLLY
3. Specify whether facility in Section Ell. l is owned by: federal; private; state; X local government.
4. Specify facility design flow: 6 MGD; facility average daily flow: 2.25 MGD;
Type of residual storage: natural banked earth la oon
Volume of residual storage: 2 million
Length of residuals storage at facility:l , 460 days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that
- are separate from treatment system. i.e. not in clarifiers, aeration basins, etc.);
Maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 1 , 4 6 0 days.
j Estimated 1volume of residuals: 130 � (dry tons/yr.);
S. Are there any other storage facilities, other than the above: currently on site: Yes, X No,
It
( If Yes, please identify:
_ 6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): W.E. NI CHOLS
! a 7. Facility contact's telephone number: ( 704 ) 82 2— 2 9 41
8. Location of treatment facility: NC Stare; GASTON County
�I
9. Mailing address:
l0. Latitude: 350 —15 ' — 5 5 " Longitude; 81� — 00 t —21'
11. Specify the source of the residuals: X treatment of water (alum sludges); treatment of industrial wastewater
(100% industrial residuals); treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater (please specify
appropriate percattages of % industrial wastewater. % domestic wastewater);
' other (explain):
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
12. Does the facility which generates We residuals have an approved pretreatment program? Yes; X No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that Is classified as "Class
I" by the appropriate federal or State authority)
i IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and frown any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
' a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CPR 261.31.261.337 Yes; X No. If Yes,
list the number(s):
1
FORM: LAORS 02/95
Page 2 of 18

b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes; No.
- Attach laboratory results for the Tonicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
j Corrosivity for each residual.
Ls'
Note: If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Cbaraeteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is by
definition a Hazardous waste. C:hemiail analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
I'PM PPm
Arsenic 5.0 Barium 100.0
Benzene 0.5
- Carbon tetrachloride Cadmium
0.5 Cblottiane 0.03
Chlorobenzette 100.0 Cbloroform 6.0
C romIum 5.0 o-Cresol 200.0
m-Cresol200.0 p-Cresol 200.0
Cresol 200.0 2,4-D 10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzette 7.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13
Endrin0.02 Heptachlor (and its hydroxide) 0.005
Hexachlotobenzene 0.13 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 0.5
Hexachloroethane 3.0 Lead
50
j Lirdane 0.4 0.
Mercury 2
.2
Methoxychlor 10.0 Methyl ethyl ketone 200.0
Nitrobenzene 2.0 Pentachlorophenol 100.0
Pyridine 5.0 Selenium 1.0
Silver 5.0 Tet iwllotoethylene 0.7
ToWhene 0.5 Trichloroethylene 0.5
j,. 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 2,4,6-Triehlorophenol 2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 1.0 Vinyl chloride 0.2
pH (2:1 vol./wt.): >2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE,
' AS NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR
THAT RESIDUAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS
APPLICATION.
' 2. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. Ibis analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely cbamcterizz the residual and trust be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the cbaracte[ization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis trust include a Minimum of the following parameters
I and any other known and suspected contaa inants that are tributary to the system.
Cadmium
Aluminum pH
Kopper Ammonia -Nitrogen Phosphorus
Calcium Potassium
Nickel Magnesium Sodium
Zinc Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen TKN
% Total Solids Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
3. Wastewater residuals shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of an
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration ofBtbese residuals attach labiduals the ceiling
( analysis):
Pollutant Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg) Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Cadmium Dry Weight Basis Dry A ei ht Basis
85 1.1
C er 4300
Lead 840 2
Nickel 420
Zinc 16
7500 � 7 C
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 3 of 18

WWTP & EQUILIBRIUM BASIN
V - PATHOGEN REDUCTION ]UNFORMATION (attach add. pages for additional sources of residuals):
1
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0200, pathogen reduction can be achieved using either 40 CFR Part 257 or 40 CFR Part
503. Since the pathogen reduction requirements found in 40 CFR Part 257 (note, "Processes to Significantly Reduce
Pathogens" or PSRP) are incorporated into 40 CFR Part 503, only Part 503 is listed below. Please check which of the
following applies to the subject residual:
_ 100% Industrial Residuals with no domestic contribution (Skip this section, proceed to Section Vi)
I
Residuals from the treatment of water (Alum Sludges) with no domestic contribution (Skip this section, proceed to Section
_ Residuals from animal processing plants (if the residuals are being injected into the soil, please explain the process and the
equipment used, skip this section and proceed to Section VI
?f Industrial residuals with domestic contribution
1. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 503, a residual can not be land applied if it does not meet one of the following alternatives
for Class B pathogen reduction.
'h 9 Please specify a, bl, b2, W, b4, b5 or c from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a, at least seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
2,000,000 most probable number per gram of total dry solids, or loss than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
4 . of total dry solids.
b. the residuals must be treated by one of the following "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
I. Aerobic D19 s inn - residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a specific mean cell
residence time and tengperattue between 40 days at 200 C and 60 days at 150 C.
2• Air DrvIIIv - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or unpaved basins for a minimum of three months.
During two of the three .months, the ambient average daily temperature is above 00 C.
3. Anaerobic Dig .se tinn - residuals are treated in the absence of air for a specific mean cell residence time and
' temperature between 15 days at 350 C to 550 C and 60 days at 200 C.
4. QM20tifl 9 - using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature
of the residuals are raised to 400 C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days. the temperature in
I the compost pile exceeds 550 C.
5. Lime Stabilization - sufficient lime is added to the residuals to raise the pH of the residuals to 12 after two hours
of contact.
c. The residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
V L RESIDUALS TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION,
1. How will the residuals be delivered to the application sites (leak proof trucks, etc.)?
leak proof 6500 gallon tankers
2. What type of equipment will be utilized for land application?
calumet liquid spreader with vacuum pressure tank, high flotation tirE
How will the application of the residual be Controlled to ensure that there is proper distribution over the site?
equipment is calibrated using speed and area
FORM: LAORS 02195 Page 4 of 18
i

WTP
1
1
V • PATHOGEN REDUCTION INFORMATION (attacb add. pages for additional sources of residuals):
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0200, pathogen reduction can be achieved using either 4() CFR Part 257 or 40 CFR Part
503. Since the pathogen reduction requirements found in 40 CFR Part 257 (note. "Processes to Significantly Reducc
Pathogens" or PSRP) are incorporated into 40 CFR Pan 503, only Part 503 is listed below. Please check which of the
following applies to the subject residual:
_ 100% Industrial Residuals with no domestic contribution (Skip this section, proceed to Section Vi)
2 Residuals from the treatment of water (Alum Sludges) with no domestic contribution (Skip this section, proceed to Section
Residuals from animal processing plants (if the residuals are being injected into the soil, please explain the process slid the
equipment used, skip this section and proceed to Section V1
Industrial residuals with domestic contribution
I . In accordance with 40 CFR Part 503, a residual can n
for Clisss B pathogen reduction. ot be land applied if it does not meet one of the following alternatives
Please specify a, bl, b2, W, b4, b5 or c from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a. at least seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
2,000,000 most probable number per gram of total Cry solids, or less than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
�_. of total dry solids.
b. the residuals must be treated by one of the following "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
I. Aerobic Divregtinn - residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a specific mean cell
residence time and teurperatufe between 40 days at 200 C and 60 days at 150 C.
2• Air Drying - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or unpaved basins for a minimums of three months.
During two of the three months, the ambient average daily temperature is above 00 C.
3. Anaerobic Dig .s ion - residuals are treated in the absence of air for a specific mean cell residence time and
temperature between 15 days at 350 C to 550 C and 60 days at 200 C.
4. C=Mtin t - Using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature
of the residuals are raised to 400 C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days. the temperature in
the compost pile exceeds 550 C.
5. Lime Stabilization - sufficient lime is added to the residuals to raise the pH of the residuals to 12 after two hours
of contact. '
e. The residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Siguifcandy Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
VI, RESIDUALS TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION:
How will the residuals be delivered to the application sites (leak proof trucks, etc.)?
see previous
2. What type of equipment will be utilized for land application?
see previous
3. How will the application of the residual be controlled to ensure that there is proper distribution over the site?
see previous
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 4 of 18

4. Will the land application operation utilize a contractor who Specializes in Residuals Management or will the permittee
j management the program? X Contractor; Permittee. If a contractor is utilized, provide the name. of the firm, a
contact, address, and telephone number BIO—NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
-? 516 ROUNDTREE RD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28217 [phone]
N'II. SITE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED LOADING RATES:
I '
The following sites are to be used for land application under this permit application [please attach map(s),see 1.a.]:
Application Area [acres) Maximum slope
n (earludingent SEE FARMER — LANDOWNER — FIELD SUMMARY ATTACHMENT
'I
±I
Note: If more than ter, (10) sites are to be covered by this application, please attach a form listing all of the sites along
with the information listed below:
a. A vicinity snap must be attached. This trap must show the location of each site in relation to at least two
geographical references and major Intersection (numbered roads, named Weams/rivers, etc,),
b. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached delineatitig both total and buffered acres.
This map trust be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not exceeding ten feet or 25% of total site relief
(whichever is more descriptive) and showing the property lines; all existing wells, all surface waters and drainage ways
and all dwellings within 500 feet of the land application areas; and all buffers.
Note: • The following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the sites, larger buffets may be required:
1. 400 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or which is to be sold
for surface residual application,
200 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or whieb is to be sold
for subsurface residual iujectiom
2. 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply source, all streams classified as WS or B,
waters classified as SA or SB and any Class I or Class U impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking water.1
3, 100 feet between any surface residual application. area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way,
50 feet between any subsurface residual injection area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way. t
4. 50 feet between the residual application area and property lines for both surface and subsurface application (if the
original permit was issued with the buffer distance to property line as 100 feet updated maps must be submitted
and new acreage delirieated for the buffer to be reduced).
S. 10 feet between the, disposal arts and any interceptor diains or surface water diversions (upslope),
6. 25 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (downslope).
7. 25 feet between the disposal area and any groundwater lowering and surface drainage ditches.
t SPECIFY THE NAME OF AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CLOSEST DOWNSLOPE SURFACE WATERS
(as established by the Environmental Management Conunission) TO THE LAND APPLICATION SITES). USE
THE ATTACKED INFORMATION SHEET (PAGE 9 0P 18) TO OBTAIN THIS LNTORMATION.
FORM: LA.ORS 02/95 Page 5 of 18

Note: The maximum slopefor land
application of residuals is 10% for surface application and 189b for subsurface
application.
For each land application site, attach a soil evaluation by a soils scientist (the evaluation must be signed by the soil
scientist) which addresses soil color; the depth, thickness and type of restrictive horizons; the presence or absence of a
seasonal high watertable or bedrock within thm vertical feet of the deepest point of residual application; pH and cation
exchange capacity. If the depth to either groundwater or bedrock is less than three feet, please also attach a demonstration,
using predictive calculations or modeling methods acceptable to the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, that the use of this site will not result in the contravention of classified groundwater standards as contained in
NCAC 2L .0200. In no case shall the .s oaration, be loss than one foot. This report must be signed by the soil
scientist and submitted with application.
3. For each site, please attach a project evaluation conducted by an agronomist including recommendations concerning cover
crops and their ability to accept the proposed loading of liquids, solids. nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any
other contaminant know to be in the residual. A part of the agronomists recommendations must be a crop management
plat. This plan must determine the crops to be grown on the site(s), when they should be grown and bow they should be
harvested and marketed. This report must be signed by the agronomist and submitted with application.
4. Attach a representative soils analysis of each site. The soils analysis shall include the following parameters, along with
any other significant parameter that has been shown to be. contained in the residual:
Standard Soil Fertility Test (which includes): pH Phosphorus Potassiwm
Acidity Calcium Manganese
Magnesium Zinc Copper
% Humic Matter Sodium Cation Exchange Capacity
Base Saturation (by calculation)
;.. And the following Pollutants: Cadmium Lead Nickel
5. In order to assist DEM in the review of the proposed loading rates, please complete the calculations contained in the
attachment titled "Calculations Work Sheet" (begitming on Page i 1 of 18). If more than one residual is to be covered by
Us permit, additional worksheets trust be attaebed.
VI. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Five (5) complete copies of the permit application and five (5) copies of all required supporting information, including
cover letters must be submitted or the application package will be returned as incomplete.
2. Please explain bow access to the land application sites, by both people and animals, will be controlled following the
applicadotiofresiduals: sites restricted bygates/fences, signs posted
a. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application sites within 30 days after the application of residuals.
b. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application sites during the active site use and
for 12 months following the last application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at the site.
3. Please explain the procedures that will be used to establish and maintain the buffers during the application process (i.e.. will
the sites be flagged): sites flagged prior to land application
4. Please attach an executed "Agreement For the Land Application of Residuals to Private Lands" for each land application site
that is not owned by the applicant. A copy of the DEM approved fonn is attached. If the applicant wishes to use a
different form or a modified form, prior approval must be received from DEM.
5. Each application Site must be assigned a site identification number.
6. Attachments may be utilized to provide the information that is requested in this application form; however, if attachments
are utilised, their location should be so indicated on the application form. All attachments must be numbered to correspond
to the individual parts of the application that require the attachment. If the attachments are part of a larger document, a
table must be provided that lists the locations of the required information.
FORM: LAORS 02/95
Page 6 of IS

08/30/1999 09:18 7045291640 BIONOMIC PAGE 0B
A pPlicant's .Certifi.cs.Y
' �ttesC•
I�
this �'icaion f(f �)
l• v
has'b*-n review ? i b
Cd by tom. arid::'#.=;,=a+i1 ' a.:. , :'i e�: [' ni;:
FII
appac4gn are not lewe Y ! 7 kavwkdge, I understand that if. su required pata of this
°°d,•'r„lAitP�satipo and attachtnen�va nvt inctudod, Shia application parka$e
] be re,t ed as inpomp
t: igttet 'i Date a —�
.. �tiiAi �X••�4.4t•�•l iY M. �'i•g•'' i1lJ,�..r:".' �:.,'•. + r +�1G'Ii;iyfiNG ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
M'A'TE' r' •"$ ''T 1:' '#I FOLLOWING ADDRB$$,
<'
NORTH CA'-it(;fIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
to r• ::.Y ,::..'r.i:
:;, I1'Y.GN'E-ERING UNIT
: , H ,-�;.-,;4 APLINA 27626-0535
< .EX,:.`(919) .733-5083
733.9919
}s.
• :.il�y�';,. sir.+I�: _.$.{r., .,�•;i;'� � ••
�.. ter.. -Tr . -�.�_, "+'•; :.'rtv. :'.::.: :: 1.•j,: •:.;i.r"::.' i '
• : ,::icy'.;••:+"�"Yil, .:::+r''ir'i'

instructions:
Processing of this application will not be initiated until five (5) copies of all of the following
items have been submitted in addition to five(5) copies of the completed application form. If
any of the below items have been excluded from the package, please explain.
t. Is a general location map included?
YES x or NO
2. Is a site map (drawn to scale) included which delineates total and buffered acres and
shows all property lines, buffers, existing wells within 500 feet, topography, drainage
features, and any surface waters?
YES—x or NO
3. Is a vicinity map enclosed which clearly indicates the projects location with respect to
State roads and named Surface waters?
YES x or NO
4. Is a signed soil scientist report included which defines the following.
a) field descriptions of texture, color, and structure,
b) depth and thickness of soil horizons,
;c) presence of any restrictive soil horizons or layers,
d) depth to seasonal high water table,
e) the hydraulic conductivity,
f) recommended loading rate for the site,
YES or NO �x
5. Is a signed agronomist's report included which identifies the crop and loading
recommendations for N-P-K?
YES x or NO
6. Is the Crop Management Plan included in the application package?
YES x or NO
7. Has the Land Owner's agreement been completed and signed?
YES x or NO
B. Appropriate fee in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5)-(eft. February 1, 1993):
New Applications, Modifications or Late Renewals $400.00
Timely Renewals without Modifications $250.00
YES or NO x
9. Five (5) copies of all reports, evaluations, agreements, supporting calculations, etc, must
be included as a part of the application package.
FORM: LAORS 02/95
Page 8 of 18

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGIONAL OFFICES (12194)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Ttawylvania
Henderson
Xancy
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore
BWm Robeson
Cumberland Richmond
Harnett Sampson
Hoke Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Strut
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 77146M
Fax [phone]
Alam=e Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe Stokes
Caswell Surry
Davidson Watauga
Davie Wilkes
Forsyth Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
Post Office Box 1507
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bettie Lenoir
Camden Martina
Cbowan Pamlico
Craven Pasquotank
Cur ituck Perquinuins
Date Pitt
Gates Tyrell
Greene Washington
Hertford Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax[phone]
Alexander Mecklenburg
Cabanas Rowan
Catawba Stanly
Gaston Union
ltedell Cleveland
Lincoln
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 10 of 18
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham Nash
Durham Notthamptvn
Edgeoombe Orange
Franklin Pelson
Granville Vance
Halifax Wake
Johnston Warren
IIe Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
lkx [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pander
Duplin

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Off7ce and included with the
1 submission of the appLication package.
— INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to deter -mine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 tl mUgh 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other ):
rTTY OF MT. -HOLLY
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: W.E.—NOCHOLS
P . 0 R(lX 4n
City: MT. HOLLY _ State: NC Zip: 28210
Telephone Number:( 704 ) _
3. Project Name: MT. HOLLY T ANT) APPr Tr,ATTnNT
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 686 dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface waters: JOHNS ONS CREEK
6. County(s) where land application site is located: GASTON & LINCOLN
7. Map name and date: LO IESVILLE 1970) k LAKE NORMAN (1970 )
8. Applicant Signature:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map segmept:
Name of surface wagers:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable: *Aa p
Signature of regional office personnel: / Date:
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 9 of 18

..Manna
a19
�. _i �� - _ •, �� �(� - � .-\� � - - Boo -titi7 8-ro��.. \
l.i ncoln �
. - \lam ,� - � I 1 I � �' ?' . , ,�- ` .. -C'� •�
i
1 — 5r,
Aq
00.
16.,.
I ;ss . � _�, \ \` yet• / -8, 5
800
h. I
Ili � �__ � Li \ `\�.%�� •. •v �• '� 1 , •- .0 - {�. � /,.'� � /� � / � \ ..\.- J •r_ � .�` L .(I
I I \•-l. — / �1 •-fib ��\\•• � \- � ' i
\ >�. FIELD GDM2 '
FIELD G D-3 i) f / . a.
FIELD GD
,1 FIELD
FIELD GD-4_`
FIELD GD-
��_� FIEL GD-7
6Cb .-Ruck Hill •r ' - _ • �. - 1 - _ ' by I - - _ —
8N 78; IAWCSVille I -_
-- / -
_--j
. .
PROJECT BIO-NOMIC SCALE:
1.1i=20001
JOB NO: 1584=92-005
Holly Land Application
,ary Duckworth Farm SERVICES, INC.
RG. NO: Fields. 4 5 6.7

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
Ii\STRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be.
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1. through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Qualitv Supervisor (see attached listing). At a mirvmum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute. OSGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other ):
OF MT.-FLOLLY
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: W.E. NOC
City: MT . HOLLY State: NC Zip: 28210
Telephone Number: ( 704 ) 8 2 2 _ 2 q3
i 3. Project Name: MT. HOLLY pr TrZ1TTnB1
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 686 dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface waters: FORNEY CREEK
6. County(s) where land application site is located: GASTON & LINCOLN `
7. Map name and date: LOWESVILLE 1970) s LAKE NORMAN (1970 )
8. Applicant Signature: s
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters: �-o
Classification (as established by the Envirorunental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date: —%Si—
FORM: LAORS 02195
Page 9 of 18

7
E2Zt Lincoln -
High Sc
<
7_m
A
4
V
7�5
55
S
\37/
lor.wm-1 K�
'7
C a el%,M t4
3920
zz z
.7�80
21, c =7Fook Hill
6
-67 25'
B owesville
3919
TOPOGRAPHY MAP
S CALE ' 1: 24 , 0 0
BLUE COLOR -INDICATES WATER
Pond'or 1,ake (zf3 c>_
Stream o.r river
Intermittent stream
- FARM :-
a44-%' FIELDS: _1D

v
Tills form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Offlcera `". ne ud n,. -1th the
submission of the application package.
ItiSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these, land application activities w
located, you are required to submit this form, with items I c�'?rough 8 compt lill be.
ei .to the appmpnate Division of
I Environmental Management Regional Water
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a7.5 mSuper-visor
pu e �USGS Topographic Map wh chls�hows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal,
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other 1:
OF MT. HOLLY
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: W.E. NOCHOT S
City: MT. HOLLY State: NC Zip: 28210
Telephone Number: ( 7 0 4
3. Project Name: MT • HOLLY
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 6 8 6
PP dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface waters: JOHNSONS CREEK
6. County(s) where land application site is located: GASTON & LINCOLN
7. Map name and date: LOWESVILLE 1970) LAKE NORMAN ( 1970 )
8. Applicant Signature:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map segment:_
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Envirotunental Management Commission): h/,5 —
Proposed Classification, if applicable:��
Signature of regional office personnel:
Date:
,
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 9 of 18

--
IQ
Uk
Gol
Cem
�" \ r- 9farchas. .. - - 726F.
- \. `\• ., �a?f_75�•.1 'y ` - _
- 3921 1�- - ) 1 Chape/
Cowans Ford
�Zbi:z^:a.- \stand j.
1.
e6w-ans Ford
3920
ApJmlo �� / y u_a —
` L / k ISifford—/1'
Island
773
728
-� •,\ - •�1,�. 1,11� � - ... ���r == 1�-._.�^v' /1 — i /fir \\�\
25
TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE 1.:2.4,000
BLUE COLOR INDICATES WATER
Pond or lake (::::::D p.
Stream or river
Intermittent stream
FARM: R 04 - s4 jw-11 M-A 1 FLELDS

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional OMce and included with the
submission of t e application package.
- INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 cotnpieteti, to the appmpliate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (sec attached listing). At a minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy 5 of the portion of a 7.minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specifv the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other ):
�rTTy OF MT. HOLLY
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: W.E. NOCaOLS
p_o Rnx 4nF,
City: MT. HOLLY State: NC Zip: 28210
Telephone Number: ( 704 )
j —
3. Project Name: MT • HOLLY LAND APPT.T(-Z1mTnTT
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 686 dry tons per year
5. Name of closest surface waters: LEEPERS CREEK
6. County(s) where land application site is located: GASTON & LINCOLN
7. Map name and date: �L0 IESVILLE (1970) LAKE NORMAN (1970 )
8. Applicant Signature:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map Wgment:
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environrnental Management Commission): S
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date:
FORM- LAORS 02/95 Pale 9 of 18

TOPOGRAPHY. MAP
SCALE 1:24,000'"
BLUE COLOR INDICATES WATER
Pond or lake p..
Stream or river
Intermittent stream
FARM: 64Aa1's M K.,I MY a FIELDS • � — �

This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
IrNSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land
located application activitie
. you are required ; s � rll he
eQ o submit this form, with items I through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
Emrron.mental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a niitumum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the subnuttal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other l:
i
OF MT. H LL
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: W . E . Noexo .s
i
City: MT. HOLLY State: NC Zip: 28210
Telephone Number: ( 7 0 4 ) _
3. Project Name: MT. HOLLY r A rn APPT Tr.T.,,TOhi
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: 686 dry tons per year
S. Name of closest surface waters: ANDFRgoN eRFFu
6. County(s) where land application site is located: GASTON & LINCOLN
- 7. Ma name and dat • L
P e. OWESV i ILLE 1 LAKE NORMAN 1970)
-- 8. Applicant Signature: ��►`�"; - .
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Envirorunent:al Management Commission): a';,�
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date: O—/ . q
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Pape 9 of 18

— _
Creek
� —, . , f..:. - , •� . - _ - ,y - \' �./, %tip �,\
Q
=a50872
A.
Op
+'_- •• `� � ./ice ��. '= --. - 1�`\'. ._� - � / �--� / C\ � I _
_1 ''.1i;\ ••'fie � � � ;�_,�\`/` ••\' \. �` _ — - ` ^.$k _ ,` / .
Tucker Gro'.e Ch ,_� Tuc rove
Cem�ti� -Camp ound\ \ .� -- =/ :1.: \ •�.— / \\\...
.,each •`��' i, -
- /-z
aForney
-- --- - .. \ - `BOOZZ
15
\ — 1---
...'-
TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE 1.24.000
1. 1
BLUE COLOR I.NDICATES'.WATER
Pond or lake cop_
Stream or river
n. In-termittent stream ..,. .,�
FARM: te-i it+l y .FIELDS: / a

CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as
possible. Its preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A . List the specific residual that is covered by these calculations (place or process of origin)
Mt. � "w-P
Wbat are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied eacb year?
Total Dry Tons = Gallons of Residuals * Solids * 8.34 lbs./gallon
2,000 lbs./ton
Total Thy Tons = * * 8.34 lbs./gallon
1100
2,000 lbs./ton
5 OD Dry Tons per year
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
eeptanation and provide calculations for a rcb variation.
B . Complete the following calculations to establish
the portion of the residual that is made
up of the various parameters:
j-. 90 Total Solids = 3.3�
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 11 of 18

C . Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) calculations and land application area requirements:
I. -Mineralization Rate (MR)
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are establisbed, attach the documentation The default values are as follows):
Unstabiliaed Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobicaily Digested Residuals 20°10
Composted Residuals 10%
(U the default values are used, attach an explanation its to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application method proposed (Please note, the Mineralization
Rate [MR) should be utilized in the following calculations as a decimal):
PAN for Surface Application
PAN = [(MR) x (TKN - N143)1 + .5 x (NH3) + (NO3-NO2 :N)
PAN =[ •3 x( �a� oc� )1+.5x(_
PAN = I i 7 SO PPM Dry Weight
PAN for Subsurface Application
PAN = ((MR)x(TKN , NH3)) + (NH3) + (NO3-NT02-M
PAN =[ 3 300 )1+( IS + rd-
PAN = _ �� , 460 PPM Dry Weight
I Total PAN to be land applied per year
Total dry wns of residual to be land applied per year: 'SOU
Total PAN ir; pounds «
per dry ton 1,000,000
= (PAN in PPM Dry Weight) x 0.002
43.5 Pounds(Dry Ton/Yen
Total PAN in pounds = (PAIN in pounds /Dry Ton) x Total tons of residual to be land applied
43, 5 x S0o
a 1, ) 5 a Pounds/Yew
Due to the fact that organic nitrogen is mineralized slowly over time, the amount of nitrogen that comes available in years
following the initial application trust be taken into consideration when calculating application rates for the subsequent
years. This being the case, please attach an evaluation of this factor and Its impact on loading rates. Show the adjusted pan
for at least five years.
The maximum adjusted annual PAN is aG4. 5 Pcunds/Year.
4. Crop information on nitrogen uptake per year
(Dlvisioot Recommendations) (Provide for the Crops Specified)
Crop(s) PAN (Ibs./acre/year) PAN (lbs./acre/year)
Alfalfa 200
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture.) 220
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 12 of 18
I'.

li
Blue Grass
120
Corn (Grain)
160 16 b
Corn (Silage)
�00
Cotton
70
Fescue
250 a5%,
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
75
Milo
100
Small Grain (Wheat, barley, oats)
100 j
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
180
- Sorghum,, Sudex (Silage)
220
Soybeans
200
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
200
-- Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if
i'
different than 17i�7sion Recommendations:
5. Total acres needed to land apply the pounds of available nitrogen calculated above
Tom acres needed: = Maximum total ndnndc of Dlant availa�t m en (PAN)
Pounds of nitrogen needed for crop*
Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN a ) T 5 acres
This value must be the value for the prop to be grown that has the lowest nitrogen uptake rate per acre.
If there are various crops that will only be utilized for certain sites, please attach the calculations for each site and determine
the total needed acres using the format outlined above,
D. Calculate the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
(**This section must be completed in mg/l, to convert: mg/kg x % solids [as a decimal] = mg/1**)
SAR = Na Milli Equivalent + [0.5 (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli Equi' alenol 0.5
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) Equivalent Weight = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) a4o.4 (mgA) + 23
CALCIUM (Ca) 1 040.1 (mg/l) + 20
MAGNESIUM (Mg) Ci6.q 6 (mg/1) 12
SAR = 1 n S_S q
If calculation sheets are being completed for more than one residual or site, please attach a
summary sheet that bring the results of all the calculation sheets to one point.
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 13 of 18

E. Determine the Site Life for this land application site:
The lifetime pollutant loadings shall not be exceeded. The site life is determined by calculating the number of years that the site
- can receive the residual without exceeding the lifetime pollutant loadings. The site life calculations will be based on the most
restrictive crop plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement specified and the maximum dry tons of residuals to be land applied
I
annually. Tbexefore, in the table below the Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year will be calculated as:
L Most restrictive crop based on the (P nitrogen plant available
1? g (PAN) requirement: _ 50,411 (kfzLn
Associated plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement ) OG (lbs./acxe/year)
2. I.Iittimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAIN (as found in C.5 above); acres
3. Dry Tons of Residuals to be land applied per year. 00 dry tons per year
4. Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year =
Minimum number of acres required for land application
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = a.3
If any of the application sites am to be loaded at greatex than the rate specified above, please specify the loading rate and explain.
Tops of Residuals to be Applied/AcrelYear (different from above)
Explanation:
For the purpose of site life determination, the lifetime pollutant loadings &hail not exceed the following for the corresponding
Cation Exchange Capacities (CEC). Site life for the site covered by this application shall be determined by using the lowest
<- CEC. The appropriate column should be chosen and applied in the "Allowable Lifetime Pollutant Loadings based on CEC' in
the table below.
CEC < 5 CEC 5.15 CEC > 15
Lead 500 1,000 2,000
Zinc 250 500 1,000
Copper 125 250 500
Nickel 125 250 500
Cadurium 4.5 9 18
In the table below, the bighest.annual loading (Tons of Residuals to be A lied/Acre/Year
by the ibaJdry tort of each PP )specified above, will be multiplied
pollutant tts found in IE3 above. The Site Life can then be determined by:
Site Life (Years) - Allowable Lifetime Loading (lbs /a re)
Projected Pounds to be- Applied/Acre/Year
Pollutant
Tons of
Residuals to be
Applied Per
Acre per Year
lbs./dry ton of each
pollutant
(as found in Part B
above)
Projected
Pounds to be
Applied/Acre
/Year
Allowable Lifetime
Pollutant Loadlhgs
based on CEC.
From Chart above
Site Life
(Years)
Lead
Zinc
Copper
Nickel
Cadlmium
a.3 *
0-)4
14 IY
lbs./acre
4
-
uuWd1u LOU rrve 0) pollutants above and determine which pollutant that will result in the shortest life for this site.
The Limiting Pollutant is.
The Site Life is __ 6 tl __ years.
FORM: LAORS 02195 Page 14 of 18
i�
L'
it

CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
—' This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Mimagement in reviewing tbL-, application as expeditiously as
possible. Its preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiplesources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
-- A. List the specific residual that is covered by these calculations (place or process of origin)
� t. Neil lam; i P
What are the total dry tons of this residua! to be land applied each year? —
Total Dry Tons = Gallons of Residuals * % Solids * 8.34 lbs./gallon
'� i IIIauallv l00
�J 2,000 lbs./ ton
Total Dry Tons = * • 8.34 lbs./gallon
2,000 lbs./ton
30
Dry Tons Per , year
I�
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B . Complete the following calculations to establish the portion of the residual that is made
i up of the various parameters:
cyo Total Solids = of - I
j (PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 11 of 18

C. Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) calculations and land application area requirements:
1 • -Mineralization Rate (MR) '30
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for dornestic wastewater treamiett
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation The de:sult values are as follows):
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anambically Digested Residua! s 20�c
Con4xAted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application method proposed (Please note, the Mineralization
Rate W] should be utilized in the following calculations as a decimal):
PAN for Surface Application
PAN = [NR) x (TKN NH3)] + .5 x (NH3) + (NO3-NO2--N)
i PAN=x(_ 13440o ))+.Sx( --t )+
- PAN = 16a6 PPM Dry Weight
PAN for Subsurface Application
PAN = ((MR)x(TKN - NH91 + (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN = [ +
PAN = _ 4. 6 an PPM Dry Weight
3. Total PAN to be land applied per year
Total dry ttms of residual to be land applied per year:
Total PAN ir; pounds -
per dry ton 1,000,000
= (PAN in PPhl Dry Weight) x 0.002
_ '.OLI Pounds/Dry Ton/Year
Total PAN in pound = (PAN in Pounds / Dry Ton) x Total tons of residual to be land applied
%.01( , x )31
_ 1 04S . a. Pounds/Year
Due to the fact that organic nitrogen is mineralized slowly over time, the amount of nitrogen that comes available in years
following the ;initial application trust be talcen into consideration when calculating application rates for the subsequent
years. This being the case, please attach an evaluation of thus factor and its impact on loading rates. Show the adjusted pan
for at least five years.
The maximum adjusted annual PAIN is 3-7- -) q Pounds/Year.
4. Crop information on nitrogen uptake per year
(Division Recommendations) (Provide for the Crops Specified)
Crop(s) PAN (Ibs./bcre/year) PAN (Ibs./acre/year)
Alfalfa 200
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasturc) 220
1 FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 12 of 18
I�

1
I
Blue Grass
Corn (Grain)
Corn (Silage)
sl
Cotton
Fescue
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
L_ Nuo
Small Grain (Wheat, barley, oats)
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
? Soybeans
-' Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
120
160
IE-U
200
70
250
Q5 p
75
100
100
1 �U
180
220
200
200
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than UiNision Recommendations:
j..
5. Total acres needed to land apply the pounds of available nitrogen calculated above
Tom acres needed: _ Maximum total ndu= of plant available nitrogen (PAN)
Pounds of nitrogen needed for crop*
lea
Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN = 10,E acres
* This value must be the value for the crop to be grown that has the lowest nitrogen uptake rate per acre.
If there are various crops that will only be utilized for certain sites, please atmcb the calculations for each site and determine
the total needed acres using the format outlined above,
D, Calculate the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
(* *This section must be completed in mg/l, to convert: mg/kg x % solids [as a decimal] = mg/1**)
SAR = Na Milli Equivalent + (0.5 (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli Equivalent)) 0.5
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) + Equivalent Weight = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) S. a a (mgA) + 23
CALCIUM (Ca) 23.44 (mg/1) r 20
MAGNESIUM (LMg) (mg/1) + 12
SAR
If calculation sheets are being completed for more than one residual or site, please attach a
summary sheet that bring the results of all the calculation sheets to one point.
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 13 of 18

E. Determine the Site Life for this land application site:
The lifetime pollutant loadings shall not be exceeded. The sate lift is determined by calculating the nwnber of years that the site
can receive the residual without exceeding the lifetime pollutant loadings. The site life calculadons will be based on the most
restrictive crop plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement specified and the maximum dry tons of residuals to be land applied
annually. 13erefore, in the table below the Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year will be calculated as: j
- 1 Most restrictive crop based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: SrM6f C,t,-\
Associated plant available nitrogen (PAID;) requirmem ) d0 (lbs./acre/year)
2. Minimum ac7es needed based on most restrictive PAN (as found in C.5 above): 0 . S acres
3. Dry Tons of Residuals to be land applied per year. _ 13) dry tons per year
4. Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = pry Tonc/Ye�r of R ciduAle to - tAnri applied
Minim= number of acres required for land application
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/AcrelYear - J;Q.t 4
If any of the application sites are to be loaded at greater than the rate specified above, please specify the loading rate and explain:
T-Dos of Residuals to be Applied/Acre[Ycar (different from above) =
Explanation:
For the purpose of site life determination, the lifetime pollutant loadings shall not exceed the following for the corresponding
Cation Exchange Capacities (CEC). Site life for the site covered by this application shall be determined by using the lowest
CEC. The appropriate coltran should be chosen and applied in the "Allowable Lifetime Pollutant Loadings based on CEC" in
the table below.
CEC. < 5 CEC 5-15 CEC > 15
Lead
500
1.000
2,000
Zinc
Copper
230
125
500
1,000
Nickel
125
250
250
500
500
Cadmium
4.5
9
18
In the table below, the highest.annual loading (Tons of Residuals to be Appbed/Acrc/Year) specified above, will be multiplied
by the 1bsJdry ton of each polluMM as found in B above. The Site Life can tben be determined by:
Site Life (Years) = AlLaZableL• e Loadings re
Projected Pounds to be Applied/Acre/Year
Pollutant
Tons of
Residuals to be
Applied per
Acre per Year
lbs./dry tots of each
pollutant
(as found in Part B
above)
Projected
Pounds to be
Applied/Acre
/Year
Allowable Lifetime
Pollutant Loadings
based on CEC.
From Cbart above
Site Life
(Years)
Lead
Zinc
Copper_
Nickel
Cadmium
a.0 L( *
*
. � 4*
1�,41i *
_
`) —
a-7
. a's =
a _
i,Ki
���
4n
Ibsdacre
aQ
a5o
— 671
= aS
_ 4 0
�UuLJJaic Luc live P1 pOtlUtants above and deternunc which pollutant that will result in the shortest life for this site.
The Limiting Pollutant is. Ca r
The Site Life is _ �__---_ years.
_ FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 14 of 18
1,
�J

1310-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
Specializing in today's needs for environmental protection.
516 Roundtree Road - Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 - [phone] - Fax [phone]
MT. HOLLY
Agronomist Report
These sites are part of the ongoing land application program for sludge generated at the
Mt. Holly VW TP and the Mt. Holly WTP. It has been a successful program for several
years and land application of this sludge has become a customary part of crop
production for several farmers in the area.
Normal planting, harvesting and production procedures should continue to be followed
for the proposed crops. Hay and pasture should be mowed or grazed closely before
application of sludge to allow 30 days of regrowth to meet the 30-day restricted feeding
provision of the regulations. Forage crops (hay, pasture, sudan) may have the sludge
incorporated into the soil prior to planting or surface applied to established crops.
Sludge will be applied and incorporated into the soil prior to planting corn, soybeans,
and small grains. A suitable vegetative cover will be maintained in accordance with
good agronomic practice and NCDEHNR requirements.
Heavy metals and soluble salts from the sludge are not a problem for the soil or crops.
Application rates will be monitored to comply with lifetime loading rates for individual
metals.
Nitrogen is the liming factor for applying sludge, although the soil pH must be monitored
with annual applications because of the calcium content of the lime stabilized sludge.
When sludge is applied in a field within three (3) years of the previous sludge
application, residual nitrogen will be considered to determine the appropriate PAN
requirement for the proposed crop.
Recommendations for N, P and K fertilizer must wait until the specific crop will be
planted in each field. Fertilizer recommendations, as specified by North Carolina
Extension Service, will be recommended to the farmer.
Harvested crops will not be used for human consumption.
C*topher N. Edmonds
Agronomist
A Carylon Company

' 0BIO-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
Specializing in today's needs for environmental protection.
516 Roundtree Road • Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
MT. HOLLY, NC (WWTP & BASIN)
FIVE YEAR ADJUSTED PAN
CROP: FESCUE 250 LBS. PAN/YEAR
RESIDUAL PAN = 50% OF PREVIOUS YEAR'S PAN
TOTAL PAN = RESIDUAL PAN + PAN FROM CURRENT SLUDGE
APPLICATION
LBS. PAN
YEAR OF APPLICATION
DT SLUDGE/YEAR 1
2
3
4
5
7.5 250
125
63
3.7
125
63
31
3.7
125
63
31
4.6
156
78
4.2
141
TOTAL PAN 250
250
251
250
250
AVERAGE SLUDGE APPLICATION = 4.7
AVERAGE ANNUAL ADJUSTED PAN = 43.5 PAN/DT * 4.7 DT = 204.5
A Carylon Company

1310-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
Specializing in today's needs for environmental protection.
516 Roundtree Road • Charlotte, North Carolina 28217-2133 • [phone] • Fax [phone]
MT. HOLLY, NC (WTP)
FIVE YEAR ADJUSTED PAN
CROP: FESCUE 250 LBS. PAN/YEAR
RESIDUAL PAN = 50% OF PREVIOUS YEAR'S PAN
TOTAL PAN = RESIDUAL PAN + PAN FROM CURRENT SLUDGE
APPLICATION
LBS. PAN
YEAR OF APPLICATION
DT SLUDGE/YEAR 1
2
3
4
5
7.5 250
125
63
3.7
125
63
31
3.7
125
63
31
4.6
156
78
4.2
141
TOTAL PAN 250
250
251
250
250
AVERAGE SLUDGE APPLICATION = 4.7
AVERAGE ANNUAL ADJUSTED PAN = 8.04 PAN/DT * 4.7 DT = 37.79
A Carylon Company

Mou►ll Holly Lirne Stabilization Process Schentalic
Secondary Clarifiers Sludge Tanks
Lime added b}' tanker
ount Holly Lime Stabilization
Above. Ground
Storage
Trucked to Land Application
Sludge is drawn from the bottom of Clarifier #3 and #4 to sludge holding tanks by
return pumps. It is pumped through a 4 inch line into sludge holding tank where a
mechanical sweep is operated to keep sludge nixed. After obtaining approximately 4 to
6 percent solids, lime is hauled in by tanker trucks and mixed in until a pH of at least 12
is reached. The pH is maintained at 12 or above for two hours and at least '11.5 for
twenty-two additional hours to meet both pathogen and vector attraction reduction.
Normally approximately 9,000 gallons of lime is used to properly stabilize the sludge.
The sludge is then held from one week to two months until land application is performed
by contract operators. The sludge is pumped from the sludge tanks into tankers and
hauled to the land application site(s). Sludge samples are taken by the Contract
operators periodically and mixed prior to analysis for a representative composite,

— , --r_ —��' — I — i Imo_ � — r___ i _ __ _ _ _ _ _
t
- - _— — -- -- - - r� ti -- --' -
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
R184-134 ACCOUNT 45671 Fax No. (PAGE71 t LA
1-6446
REPORT NUMBER @Do
BID-NOMIC SERVICES, INC. MOUNT HOLLYDAVID MOTIL
516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE SAMPLED 07/03/99
LAB NUMBER = 43599 DATE RECEIVED 07/06/99
SAMPLE ID = MT HOLLY NWTP 7/2-3 DATE REPORTED 07/09/99
DETECTION
RESULT
RESULT
LIMIT
ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
--------------------
( X )
--------
(MG/KG)
-------
(MG/KG)
-------
ANALYST
-------
DATE
-------
METHOD
------------------------
REFERENCE
SOLIDS(AS IS)
3.34
33400
100
KCS
07/06/99
SM
25406
NITROGEN(TKN)
6.23
62300
100
KCS
07/07/99
EPA
351.3
PHOSPHORUS
1.40
14000
100
JCM
07/07/99
SN
846-60108
POTASSIUM
0.24
2400
100
JCM
07/07/99
SN
846-60108
SULFUR
1.74
17400
100
JCM
07/07/99
SW
846-6010B
CALCIUM
5.21
52100
100
JCM
07/07/99
SN
846-6010B
MAGNESIUM
0.29
2900
100
JCM
07/07/99
SH
846-6010B
SODIUM
0.72
7200
100
JCN
07/07/99
SH
846-60100
IRON
8510
1
JCM
07/07/99
SM
846-6010
ALUMINUM
11200
10
JCM
07/07/99
SM
846-6010
MANGANESE
240
1
JCM
07/07/99
SW
846-6010B
COPPER
302
1
JCM
07/07/99
SW
846-6010B
ZINC
1460
1
JCM
07/07/99
SN
846-60108
AMMONIA -NITROGEN
1.53
15300
100
KCS
07/07/99
EPA
350.2
NO3-NO2 NITROGEN
ND
10
KCS
07/07/99
SM
4500-NO3.F
CADMIUM
3.0
1
JCM
07/07/99
SM
846-6010B
CHROMIUM
697
5
JCM
07/07/99
SH
846-60108
NICKEL
234
5
JCM
07/07/99
SH
846-6010B
ALL VALUES ARE ON
A DRY WEIGHT BASIS
EXCEPT AS
NOTED."
WC. J�J
AUL
C. H. CHU
O MA PHI ES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential
use of our clients. and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made
to the
work. the
results. or the company in any advertising.
news release. or other public announcements without obtaining our
prior written authorization.
Copyright 1977

R184-134
REPORT NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
ACCOUNT 45671 PAGE 2
BID-NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
LAB NUMBER = 43599
SAMPLE ID = MT HOLLY WWTP 7/2-3
RESULT
PARAMETER ( X )
-------------------- --------
MOUNT HOLLY
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT ANALYSIS
(NG/KG) (MG/KG) ANALYST DATE
------- ------- ------- ------
-
DAVID NOTIL
DATE SAMPLED 07/03/99
DATE RECEIVED 07/06/99
DATE REPORTED 07/09/99
-------------------------
METHOD REFERENCE
LEAD
37
5
JCM
07/07/99
SH
846-6010B
ARSENIC
2.84
0.4
KM
07/08/99
SN
846-7061A
MERCURY
2.52
0.1
KM
07/08/99
SN
846-7471A
SELENIUM
7.05
0.1
KM
07/08/99
SW
846-7741A
PH (STD.UNITS,AS IS)
7.50
RD
07/07/99
EPA
150.1
CALCIUM CARBONATE Eq
8.18
81800
100
LDR
07/07/99
AOAC
955.01
VOLATILE SOLIDS
69.29
692900
100
KCS
07/07/99
SM
25406
ORGANIC NITROGEN
4.70
47000
100
DCH
07/07/99
CALCULATION
MOLYBDENUM
10
5
JCM
07/07/99
SW
846-6010B
ALL VALUES ARE ON A DRY )!EIGHT BASIS EXCEPT AS NOTED."
PP OAU L C. H. CHU C
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work, the results. or the company in any advertising. news release. or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. Copyright 1977
AN IJONES

A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road - Richmond, Virginia 23237 - [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
R184-133 ACCOUNT 45671 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER IR96
BID-NONIC SERVICES, INC. MOUNT HOLLY JUL 1 DAVID MOTIL
516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
LAB NUMBER = 43598
SAMPLE ID = MT HOLLY NTP 7/2-7/3
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
DATE SAMPLED 07/03/99
DATE RECEIVED 07/06/99
DATE REPORTED 07/09/99
RESULT RESULT LIMIT ANALYSIS
PARAMETER ( X ) (MG/KG) (MG/KG) ANALYST DATE METHOD REFERENCE
-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------
SOLIDS(AS IS) 2.61 26100 100 KCS 07/06/99 SM 2540G
NITROGEN(TKN) 1.34 13400 100 KCS 07/07/99 EPA 351.3
PHOSPHORUS 0.29 2900 100 JCM 07/07/99 SM 846-60108
POTASSIUM 0.06 600 100 JCM 07/07/99 SW 846-6010B
SULFUR 0.95 9500 100 JCM 07/07/99 SH 846-60108
CALCIUM 0.09 900 100 JCM 07/07/99 SH 846-6010B
MAGNESIUM 0.13 1300 100 JCM 07/07/99 SW 846-6010B
SODIUM 0.02 200 100 JCM 07/07/99 SW 846-6010B
IRON 26400 1 JCM 07/07/99 SM 846-6010
ALUMINUM 137000 10 JCM 07/07/99 SH 846-6010
MANGANESE 354 1 JCM 07/07/99 SM 846-6010B
COPPER 125 1 JCM 07/07/99 SH 846-SOIOB
ZINC 135 1 JCM 07/07/99 SH 846-6010B
AMMONIA -NITROGEN NO 100 KCS 07/07/99 EPA 350.2
NO3-NO2 NITROGEN ND 10 KCS 07/07/99 SM 4500-NO3 F
CADMIUM 1.1 1 JCM 07/07/99 SW 846-6010B
CHROMIUM 184 5 JCM 07/07/99 SW 846-6010B
NICKEL 16 5 JCM 07/07/99 SW 846-6010B
ALL VALUES ARE ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS EXCEPT AS NOTED."
PAUL C. H. CHU MA JONES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work. the resUtts. or the comnanv in anv ndvertisinq. news release. or other public, announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. Copyright 1977

R184-133
REPORT NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
ACCOUNT 45671 PAGE 2
BIO—NOMIC SERVICES, INC.
516 ROUNDTREE ROAD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
LAB NUMBER = 43598
SAMPLE ID = MT HOLLY MTP 7/2-7/3
RESULT
PARAMETER ( X )
-------------------- --------
MOUNT HOLLY
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT
(MG/KG) (MG/KG) ANALYST
---------------------
DAVID MOTIL
DATE SAMPLED 07/03/99
DATE RECEIVED 07/06/99
DATE REPORTED 07/09/99
ANALYSIS
DATE METHOD REFERENCE
------- ------------------------
LEAD
ARSENIC
60
5
JCM
07/07/99
Sit
846-6010B
MERCURY
17.28
0.4
KM
07/08/99
SW
846-7061A
SELENIUM
ND
0.1
KM
07/08/99
SH
846-7471A
PH (STD.UNITS,AS IS) 6.00
1.90
0.1
KM
07/08/99
Sid
846-7741A
CALCIUM CARBONATE EQ ND
100
RD
LDR
07/07/99
07/07/99
EPA
AOAC
150.1
955.01
VOLATILE SOLIDS 28.74
287400
100
KCS
07/07/99
SM
25406
ORGANIC NITROGEN 1.34
13400
100
DCH
07/07/99
CALCULATION
MOLYBDENUM
44
5
JCM
07/07/99
Sid
846-6010B
ALL VALUES ARE ON A DRY idEIGHT BASIS EXCEPT AS NOTED."
�UL C. "H.CH—U k R N JONES
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made to the
work, the rPsults, or the rornoanv in ary advertising. news release. or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. C onvrigh? 11177

TestAmerica
I N C O SPO RATED
4310 EAST' ANDERSON ROAD / ORLANDO. FL 32812 / 407-851-2560 / FAX: [phone]
FL DEP CXAP # 870223G • FL DHRS DW # 83331, E83012 • NC DEM ENV # 327
NC DEHNR DW 12708 • SC DHEC # 96012 • VA DCLS DW # 00042
TESTAMERICA, INC. Order #: B9-07-069
I-85 S BLDG. 2848, SUITE E Date: 07120199 08:24
CHARLOTTE, NC 28208 Work ID: BIO-NOMIC SERVICES
Date Received: 07103199
Attn: Charles Cabaniss Date Completed: 07119199
Invoice Number: Client Code: TAM CHAR
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Sample Sample Sample Sample
Number Description Number Description
01 MH WWTP
Certified By
MARK RUSLER, CHEMIST

Order # B9-07-069
07120199 08:24
Sample: 01A MH WWTP
Test Description
CORROSIVITY
IGNITABILITY EPA
Page 2
TEST RESULTS BY SAMPLE
Collected: 07102199 Category: SLUDGE
Result Limit Units Analyzed Z
7.30 pH UNITS 07114199 NF
10 >70 Degrees Celsius 07110199 CV

� I
I '
Order # B9-07-069
07120199 08:24 TEST RESULTS BY SAMPLE
Sample Description: MH WWTP Lab No: 01A
1 Test Description: HERBICIDES TCLP Method: EPA 8151A Test Code: TCHERB
i
q Collected: 07/02/99 09:00 Category: SLUDGE
PARAMETER
2,4 D
2, 4, 5 TP
SURROGATE oRECOVERY
I DCAA 50
�J
i
,
!
;I
I
RESULT LIMIT oSPK RECOV
BDL 0.02 40 U
BDL 0.005 53 U
LIMITS
0 - 160
Notes and Definitions for this Report:
EXTRACTED 07109199
DATE RUN 07118199
ANALYST JLS
INSTRUMENT 6890
CONC FACTOR 1
UNITS mq/L
COLUMN DBXLB
+ _ Sample Description: MH WWTP
Test Description: METALS SCAN TCLP
Collected: 07102199 09:00
r
i
i I
PARAMETER
Arsenic
f—
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
r '
r-1
i
f
;
l
I
1 �I
I
Lab No: 01A
Method: EPA601OB7470 Test Code: TCLP M
Category: SLUDGE
RESULT
RUN ON
BY SPIKE
RECOV
<0.100
07112199
KS
82
0.130
07112199
KS
92
<0.010
07/12/99
KS
90
0.025
07/12/99
KS
93
<0.100
07112199
KS
92
<0.002
07/13/99
CR
119
<0.100
07112199
KS
ill
<0.010
07112199
KS
86
Notes and Definitions for this Report
UNITS mq/L
Page 3

Order # B9-07-069
07120199 08:24 TEST RESULTS BY SAMPLE
Sample Description: MH WWTP Lab No: 01A
Test Description: PESTICIDES TCLP Method: EPA 8081A Test Code: TCPEST
Collected: 07102199 09:00 Category: SLUDGE
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT eSPK_REC
Endrin
BDL
0.0002
80 _U
Lindane
BDL
0.004
83 _U
Methoxychlor
BDL
0.18
89 _U
Toxaphene
BDL
0.024
47 _U
Chlordane
BDL
0.0014
67 _U
Heptachlor
BDL
0.0003
80 _U
Heptachlor Epoxide
BDL
0.0008
83 U
Notes and Definitions for
this Report:
EXTRACTED
07/08/99
DATE RUN
07110199
ANALYST JLS
INSTRUMENT
6890
CONC FACTOR
1
UNITS
mq/L
COLUMN
DBXLB
Sample Description: MH WWTP Lab No: 01A
Test Description: REACTIVITY - EPA SW846 8.3 Method: SW-846 8.3 Test Code: REACTS
Collected: 07102199 09:00 Category: SLUDGE
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT ANALYST
H2S BDL 1 CV
CN BDL 1 CV
Notes and Definitions for this Report:
DATE RUN 07/08/99
UNITS mq/Kq
Sample Description: MH WWTP Lab No: 01A
Test Description. TCLP SEMI-VOLS Method: EPA 8270C Test Code: TC625
Collected: 07102199 09:00 Category: SLUDGE
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT SPK RECOV Q
Page 4

Order # B9-07-069
07120199 08:24 TEST
RESULTS
BY SAMPLE
Sample Description: MH WWTP
Lab No:
01A
Test Description: TCLP SEMI-VOLS
Method:
EPA 8270C
Collected: 07102199 09:00
Category:
SLUDGE
O-Cresol
BDL
0.1
42 U
M-Cresol + P-Cresol
0.324
0.1
33 _
2,4,5 Trichlorophenol
BDL
0.1
69 _U
2,4,6 Trichlorophenol
BDL
0.1
64 _U
Pentachlorophenol
BDL
0.1
95 _U
Pyridine
BDL
0.1
36 _U
Nitrobenzene
BDL
0.1
47 _U
Hexachloroethane
BDL
0.1
19 _U
Hexachlorobutadiene
BDL
0.1
23 _U
Hexachlorobenzene
BDL
0.1
76 _U
2,4 Dinitrotoluene
BDL
0.1
60 _U
1,4 Dichlorobenzene
BDL
0.1
27 U
Notes and Definitions
for this
Report:
EXTRACTED 07108199
DATE RUN 07115199
ANALYST JLS
INSTRUMENT 5970
FILE ID
CONC FACTOR 1
UNITS mg/L
Sample Description: MR WWTP Lab No: 01A
Test Description: VOLATILES TCLP Method: EPA 8260B
Collected: 07102199 09:00 Category: SLUDGE
PARAMETER
RESULT
LIMIT
SPK RECOV Q
Vinyl Chloride
BDL
0.1
81 _U
1,1-Dichloroethene
BDL
0.05
86 U
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
BDL
0.1
44 U
Chloroform
BDL
0.05
94 _U
Carbon Tetrachloride
BDL
0.05
101 _U
Benzene
BDL
0.05
89 _U
1,2-Dichloroethane
BDL
0.05
87 _U
Trichloroethene
BDL
0.05
92 _U
Tetrachloroethene
BDL
0.05
92 _U
Chlorobenzene
BDL
0.05
94 _U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
BDL
0.05
96 U
Notes
and Definitions
for this
Report:
EXTRACTED 07108199
Page 5
Test Code: TC625
Test Code: TC 624

SPECIALIZED
ASSAYS, INC.
2960 Foster Creighton Dr.
P.O. Box 40566
Nashville, TN 37204-0566
Phone [phone]
(1
TESTAMERICA 5326
C•vAROLINA BUSINESS CENTER
�135 SOUTH, BLDC 2848, STE E
JCHARLOTTE, NC 28208
f
_JPro jest: MT. HOLLY WTP
Project Flame: BIO-NOMIC SERVICES
1115amp ler :
1 '
-- Analyte
196EMERAL CHEMSTF.Y ?ARMETERStr
Result Uri Its
^t,-4^L- eT I C AL R Y-EPQR T
Lab Number: 99-AI04100
Sample ID: MT. HOLLY WTP
Sample Tyke: Liquid waste
Site ID:
Gate
Collected:
7/14/gQ
Time
Collected:
10:20
Date
Received:
7/15/9S
Time
Received:
5:O0
Report Ruan Dil
Linit Linit Factor
------ ----- ------
Date Tine
-------- -----
Analyst netbod 0atch
----- ------------ -----
Reactive Cyanideis
MID ng/kg 2.0 2.0 1
7/16M
8:30
J.Tenple
Sl1-846
5349
Reactive Sulfide
48.0 nglkg 20.0 20.0 1
7116M
8:30
J.Tenple
SR-846
5349
Ignitablilty
NOT IGNITABLE OF TO 200F
7/16/99
11:00
fir•Farland
1010ii
5311
Corrosivitg
CORROSIVE
7115199
17:55
ncFarland
1110
4963
TCLF Results
flatrix Spike
Analyte Result Units Reg Linit Recovery M Date Tine Analyst Method
-------------------------- ----------- ---------- ----- --------------------- -------------- ------
-,
Arsenic
{ 0.10
ng/l
5.0
106
7/22/99
7:19
A.Bailey
6010D
Bariun
. 1.00
fig/1
100
99
1/22M
7:17
A.Bailey
60108
i -J
Cadnlun
{ 0.100
ng/l
1.0
101
7122179
7:19
A. Bailey
6010Ir
Chroniun
( 0.50
ngll
5.0
91
7122/99
7:19
A.Oailey
6010B
Lead
{ 0.50
rig/l
5.0
100
7122179
7:17
A. Bailey
60108
nercurg
{ 0.010
n9/1
0.20
98
7120177
7:33
6.11cCord
7470A
Seleniun
i 0.109
ngll
1.0
105
7122199
7:19
A.Baileg
MOD
-,
Silver
{ 0.10
n9/1
5.0
95
7122199
7:17
A. Bailey
60108
L.. j
Benzene
{ 0.05
fig/1
0.5
100
7/22/99
12:58
S. Rani
8260
Carbon tetrachloride
: 0.05
n9/1
0.5
92
7122/99
12:58
S. Rani
8260
-
Chlorobenzene
< 10.0
n9/1
100
94
7122/99
12:58
S. Rani
8260
!
ChloroForn
( 0.060
11411
5.0
94
7/22199
12:58
S. Rani
8260
1,2-Dlcbloroetbane
t 0.05
ng/1
0.5
98
7122/77
12:58
S. Rani
9260
1,1-Dichloroethene
( 0.07
n9/1
0.7
92
7/22199
12:58
S. uani
8260
l
nethylethylketone
< 20.0
ngll
M 086
7122199
12:58
S. Rani
8260
Tetrachloroetbene
{ 0.07
ng/l
0.7
92
1122/99
12:58
S. 1la0
8260
Trichlorcethene
,1 0.05
ng/l
0.5
110
7122199
12:58
S. Rani
8260
Vinyl Chloride
( 0.02
119/1
0.2
98
7122199
12:58
S. Rani
8260
Cresols
( 0.01
ng/l
200
62
7/21199
21:54
M. Cobb
8270
1,4-DIchlorebenzene
( 0.01
ng/l
7.5
24
7/21199
21:54
n. Cobb
8270
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.01
ttg/2
0.13
32
7/21199
21:54
N. Cobb
8270
Hexacblorobenierse
( 0.01
ng/1
0.13
14
7121/99
21:54
n. Cobb
8270
Hexchlor-1,3-butadiefi
( 0.01
ng/l
0.5
32
7121179
21:54
n. Cobb
8770
Hex achloroetbarse
( 0.01
ng/1
3.0
31
7/21199
21:54
n. Cobb
8270
nitrobenzene
f 0.01
ng/1
2.0
27
71-41199
21:54
n. Cobb
8270
�J
COPY 1

SPECIALIZED
ASSAYS, INC.
2960 Foster Creighton Dr.
P.O. Box 40566
Nashville, TN 37204-0566 A 1V A L Y T I G A L-- FZ ]E F' v FR T
Phone [phone]
Laboratory Number: 49-A104.100
Sample ID: MT. HOLLY WTf
Page
TUF Results
natrix Spike
Analyte
-------------------------
Result
-----------
Units
------
Rey Linit
----------
Recovery W
------------
Date
---------
Tine
-----
Analyst
----------
nethod
------
Pent ac blorophenol
5 0.01
Hg/l
100
34
7/21/SS
21:54
n. Cobb
8270
Pyridine
; U.01
t19/1
5.0
12
712115S
21:54
n. Cobb
8270
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.01
Hill
400
28
7I21195
21:54
n. Cobb
U70
1,4,6-Trichlorophenol
{ 0.01
mg/1
2.0
27
7/21/99
21:54
n. Cobb
8270
Chlordane
{ 0.003
mg/1
0.030
96
7/21177
2:13
n.Jones
8080
2,4-0
1.0
n9/1
10.0
88
7122195
12:53
A. Hunt
S150
Eadrin
It DAUD
n9/l
0.02
73
7/21/99
2:13
n. Jones
8080
Heptachlor
i 0.0008
a9/1
0.008
79
7/21/49
2:13
n.Jones
M80
U n4ane
` 0.048
n9/1
0.4
112
7/21/S9
2:13
n.Jones
8080
tfethoxychlor
{ 1.00
m9/1
10.0
87
7/21179
2:13
n.Jones
8080
Toxaphene
{ 0.050
mg/1
0.50
89
7/21199
2:13
n.Jones
am
Silvex
` 0.10
ng/l
1.0
g0
7122/97
12:53
A.Hunt
8150
Heptachlor epoxide
: 0.0008
n9/l
0.008
g9
7/21/99
2:13
n.Jones
$080
TCLP Extraction
Initiated
711V79
16:00
J. Frost
1311
Zero ►ieadspace Extraction Initiated
7/16199
16:00
J. Frost
1311
RD = Not detected at the
report Unit.
TCLP prepartion Follows method 1311,
SM-846
Revision 3.
Flash point/ignitability
reported to
the nearest
10 deg F.
j Surrogate
Z Recovery
Target
Range
VDA Surrogate, 1,2-Dichloroethane, d4
104.
60.
- 138.
V9A Surrogate, Toluene 18
105.
80.
- 123.
VIA Surrogate, 4-Dronofluorobenzene
1K
73.
- 122.
purr-nitrobenzene-0
34.
15.
- 105.
Burr-2-Fluorobiphengl
35.
17.
- 110.
surr-Terphenyl 414
47.
10.
- 116.
Burr -Phenol 45
20.
10.
- 100.
j surr-2-Fluorophenol
23.
9.
- 100.
Burr-2,4,6-Tribronophenol
47.
15.
- 131.
pest Burr-TCni
22.
20.
- 122.
r , Burr-Dibutylchlorendate
26.
10.
- 120.
sirr-DCPAA
8S.
20.
- 130.
COPY

North Carolina Division of Environmental* Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
10619:icrr�i5rw:� i►?
Yermittee: CITY OF MT, HOLLY NC
ontact Person: MR EDDIE NICHOLS/ PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
address of Permittee: P _ O . BOX 4 0 6 131 S . MAIN ST .
MT_ HOLLY NC 28120
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:
„r, r .,Ic. um "OT.T.v NC WWTP — PERMIT# WQ0001863
Site ID Number. GARY DUCKWORTH FARM
Field Number: GD-8 THRU GD—
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site): _
of Property used for residual application:
',essee of Property (if appropriate):
1�
—,Land use or cropping patterns: —
N/A
Li
to G, ✓col ✓ 60U-A
GARY DUCKWORTH
uAY AND PASTURE PRODUCTION
;Intended use or disposition of crops: LIVESTOCR FEED
l
,The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
f CITY OF MT HOLLY NC
~, hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
shown as. described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
f I
residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
_- advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
f Permits and Engineering Unit
J, Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
f�
FORM: LAORS 04/94 Page 16 of 19
�__� - ____ _._. _... _ _.._ __..-.__�_--.. �__. •. r. .�'.: ^,Trr�?�:�..� �_... ....•1.}1� ..G .a:4 ,�!� Wit:+:'.— a -.. .. ..

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Pennittee, Count and State O
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property y fficlaltion
or
and to established monitoring facilities on or nea phe application site as required by theafter residual and
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
j twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative. with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
61' The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform he Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee %ill determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the dam of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
U. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
Provisions of this Agreement.
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 16 of 18
i

14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
i
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thin 30 da
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing ng that�lw lllng tbe used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
- 16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect anproperty,
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable rie r he purpose oemises of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
— 18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this .Agreement.
- The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified
by this permit, is prohibited.
I
� i # # t # t Y t t • • Y ! # • R # # t # • • # • • Y f # • R # # t R •
I RESTRICTIONS:
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 17 of 18

f t t•*• t f R t i i i f* t f t t t t f• f• f R■ R f* f f• f t R t t f••* f f Y** i• f R t f**
Ll G o have read Us land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Pemtittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein. ,
Land Ownaf'
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, L ►.l'C. /,✓ COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 9
NOTARY-PUBL/IC
My commission Expires v o
i-
SEAL:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * R * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
t' have read this land owner's
the stipulations and restrictions as a egreemant and do hereby agree to abide by
Specified herein.
Date
* * * * * * * * * * * a * * * * * * * * * * * * * * a * * * * * * * t * * * * * R * * * * * * * * * R * * * * *
I, _ ) i %a is have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Date
FORM: LAORS 02195 Page 18 of 18
I�
�I
�J

FARMER -LAND OWNER -FIELD SUNEWARY
ACRES
FARMER FIELD LAND OWNER GROSS NET
GARY DUCKWORTH GD-1 GARY DUCKWORTH 22.3 21.1
GD-2
14.1 11.6
GD-3
4.0 3.1
GD-4
7.1 6.2
GD-5
28.7 20.4
GD-6
5.4 2.2
GD-7
3.8 3.8
GD-8
10.5 10.5
GD-9
11.9 11.9
TOTAL
107.8 90.8
SOIL TYPES
FIELD GD-1
FIELD GD-2
FIELD GD-3
FIELD GD-4
PeC2
PeC2
GhB2
PeB2
CeB2
CeB2
CeB2
FIELD GD-5
FIELD GD-6
FIELD GD-7
FIELD GD-8
PeC2
PeB2
PeC2
PeC2
PeB2
PeB2
FIELD GD-9
PeB2
CeB2
ALL FIELDS ON MAP 7 OF LINCOLN COUNTY SOIL SURVEY

ik
pc
0
k CC
C
CAT- cc zt-
U
or -0c
L6 —YL!�
13.1
01
13-1
P—pa, C—.
%
b
A
1-3
LM
1351
'355 LIU 1,7
175�
As'
"73
1336
l C—k
6 73
X-1
.2
131A
i1a
B,
IRON
.2
I
IN
1 1 I
STA
7 e im
12M,
%.3
1113
V
10*1
M2
0 U
f
27
N T Y of
-J PROJECT
Mt. Holly Land Application
lGary Duckworth Farm
T Y C
1310-NOMIC
SERVICES. INC.
rzz
'7
A
TO z
coft4am
I
Q 77
N
35-23'
N U
Ud
SCALE: I"=2 miles
JOB NO: 1584-92-005
FIG. NO: Locatio Mar) 6-1)

per/
_ z 2 SPRINGS e z
<Zrfa H CNre •�ELEM.SCH.7.
ewes 16 sy R ST
' �y pB FORNEY . hY hayeN .. ;� N •,y ,:rD�. .Lope-, i C B�qR ORD.
.'
:.� i.. g0. dEFFERSp,• - P♦�P.
°vt•RD .:D -
I ' r Dp`µri +
CASTLERDCK
{ II IV//yGA�E o��
GRFYOON _ Tv�v/TR A �N 1 .3t n`$,,?�,
CHRISTOP ER ��e n r -- Kid: Ic
IG NAGFRS HOB OLDS C ��•; ,
Qr
�j
W I PINK .+ '' c. S .•..� - 1
c:,
.U�NpOc- DOGw00D
I F SAWDu
HICKOR
. - -
P.
N. 1 � G.:�n�. - -. h..
I R;IITGSt�
JN4 M EAST
ET -OR LI NC01 4
MIDDLE a �� '? LAX LN/
h/ I J - - �_ `b P
■'. SCH, - c o °Pri sr �� soegvr
� I \ / I � � �� \ / . Pepe•. '�... p, "CLUB Qr �� F'• s � � e``—'-.��xr3 U �� lY z
flMRER.R f> TR. i- I 6 R �. ' Q ♦ • 4
A.-m �Tr-Ia _ .:. ...DO�� ^APE�R'?.HO �.,,c • :a � .
..I LARD RD. DENVER__ _s. npK. Z Z �4 SrER.C.v' G`t°
V _ .EAST — — — Po. _ • •• 2�'� ?
- INOLEN •7 N SM.a^ ,n :�!IOtR ,tco 41'
�7-IACRES W ) n r s J
n m CH - ate' vcg
kiy SG�P NpGE 64TAWBA <<s 6 I .e'er Irk
r �� LN• . A SPRINGS F
ELEM. SC -78RO. 4Ryy'a,
. fJ� OKPoOj o DENM K 9 - ■� ~ faQ' �A ri
_ I - DR. D4 - - EER T?C;�" P �yp,{ .�' aia "'�•�
C4r4W 0 TRI¢� j ,►-,� _ - W..,e
RD - ff}iCREEK FO
ach lah o DE CT. RESL
N 2� EAST LINCOLN t
c o I �vCp�N v ���� IIGH SCH: -S Yz G\"�
�� rH v� cyst'' a K'AN55�a+OR- DDR <�
F �Q h ��. CF 73 �. ORD' i papa
caJ �fA} \�S\a 4� fGy o CW aNpESt�N
I 9 - Sit HpDEP: 5 LN._.
° I � ,�♦ C ? O .,£a �. � .TR. \1 pAfSTw K' .
x J
VNLS v I/fr- S . rDP4r S. PI n+ D•. pis m I c:n
r .OpLE E LM OP i -1 r ..� 'T•f(� - tURNBERRT �? N .
oN♦HC Z .. ci'p CLug DR. ,<
f -I :SILV L - I r^ zz - - ' ®-� T 5 - pR ♦_
I RUM�C 5 RYZGQUA
i'_ i Lei pPNP Qy
.. tp♦a ♦♦OyD, ? o -1 ,� Z.. 1 -�£+ ♦.N Rq
s _ ...w BS rA3'�O� t♦ �O GOJ NT .O 9 r i CH+I°LL �1 6 g1FFORD OE" E y0.IVEY MEADOW
Z CH. Bl E ♦.N'F.�' J o L �+ OOW
p. +�
C S N� a RD. Rp B, LK- �D,aWKS .s �Di�� n� uV,
hDllD a �.cl - S nyYgR CE ROOK < _ I 3
zCH4 - - RD." C QO'. Z CT.r .' ut .�N 3 ! .
-<e9 .. UNTVpOD NGEP 9 .:3a ROelh!+C 1IIr. W
� s Q
N� M/II RD � d♦ - � � �7V�II�i � arty -�
EN.wt
S W GI MCINTOSH D. .� wOCC•�
T5 I y
Sa .
OR TRN
OUNTY - °L
� �� SEA , MBERBROOK TR
LOCATION MAP
FARM FIELDS: $ _ to

} — - Marina
- L!
-77
-grD
Sc 7 \ Sao = f 1
rem
O
-- '76 \
765
4-1
I 0N.
622
_ �\ • j917Boo
�
lemi
, •'I ''
�• : — ,,7 JL /J , 1\\" FIELD GD-2
FIELD GD-3
00
'; "55 ,' FIELD G_ D-5 << r r —
FIELD GD-1
FIELD GD-4
FIELD GD—
r . FIEL GD-7
+Cb = _iR«k Hi 1 P
{ — « BM 785 •Lowesville \t\ l 0 1 --
e
_'PROJECT BIO-NOMIC SCALE • 1584-922 005
`1t. Holly Land Application JOB PLO.
, �,�,ary Duckworth Farm SERVICES, INC. s
F16. NO. Fieldra's�r,��
r —.,— .•, 11 - -,—,7 T S tifi )

2/'30,'
�•�" _ • \ _',East Lincoln-� -
_!••'c2_'_J ..i._'ti.- High Sch'7`�
ILL-
61
785
\ Lu
2
--755
� `'. �_= _ 0 \ - T�'•E-.ems .
�\a. ` � � - -'�• �`'-- P%�/ — Hills � .1- - -,,
�, -�_ `/� -.ems-i.', _ �tiCf`�-I�•+r. --/ J Cha�elc', 39
20
AL
R�k Hi
Lim x
II. IN %T-"� - -t aM'7- ,Lowesville _
Op
TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE 1:-24.000
-- BLUE COLOR INDICATES WATER
Pond or lake (}
Stream or river
Intermittent stream -- —
FARM:G'.D FIELDS:.

,; •..• ,.tt-: ,- ems, � �
b +-
Id
M c .�
FIELD GD-2�
FIELD GD-3 06,
_ -�=:�
j FIELD GD-5 '• �' •• `'
'FIELD GD-1
7.1 �y �: T •<.
` FIELD GD-7- •�
1.3oy1 FIELD GD-4
FIELD ' GD-6
•may' _` �}'��C - ..r,1.[:� .C-.'�r.
. `j � _ � � 'ww F� .tom :y" _ . c•. .: f!•i�. :� .
i ♦ R 6L
CA
HE L
AqL .
S C ALE: 1"=660' (approx. )
PROJECT BIO-NOMIC 1584-92-005
jMt. Holly Land Application JOB NO.
'-'ary Duckworth Farm SERVICES, INC. F16. NO: ASCS Mapping
I

.` Y - _ „fir.. .._- �,a�• 1_. ._ -.... 'M._�-_�. �` �f r- l`
• �. v f -C': �, �}(d .�> C-�• T� ..f:'1��•: l�i:Y?r �P(t�-4 +•{i>' �'40
0.
lip
Z51
r E;I— A 17�
?�� !.
Aaz
iAZ .�. sr'�J1' �l� r �, _r. {' :,'f- l- L`^� ,#.v... r•a x -�'j r'-
.fn'2 �•w r..��=a• ♦a�.r t �'. ,Fr t.Y+" a s�%'i �-L:'1'�.t
s�rx,j "•�✓'s� n ?�.%v�r.:'l':a__r 4 �,) lt.. ,c^ a �, .a1rr,�,� ( "� �ti I' • }i:
a' C,c�_Jy �c rf �y. •�-.J'�� 1 k-y7 �._r e .."
�R Y J!• j,<.
7` �C.S�• f'�f. `/" - `_.4....� '`� r: r r-1� .-aer� "°�''Jcc`0.'''r.o-J'. r �� ,•'
�o. .1� 4`..-c-. a �r ��' �'.P•4-r-• �cu: °r'. •1 n(' ►. fr �.�r,y� .`�,{\,f�, es�Y � �,c _
I.
T- •.
I � ' - f'd - �y�.... `-E Zv'_•�5� ��a�l.�� i:- '`���:./' i V- 1�' <� fir' r "z =�✓+
t 3 ...• fi .�� _ . /X. :•moo , •- � J� _r _ •,-, r,.'a ,�,
_ � �•„� a � �� ='� -me`µ ,��-
[Kak
zt
Tn5.4
17-1
��������5 ,,. 1, :•1
� � �` -' � ,.- _ � �. :. may• '"5"
, ��. t ��. YT: �t✓��L �•r ^: � F n�� I� �, �_ L.!•r>:: t' 1.�.�r•• �iyL_(.•L
-c, �, yf L• i..,F - it-+- C.
-_ _/� d'r "'�Y _ ` •. M.�!`A^' - �,� Cam, C
,. •. _
'71� e°• l o� 1 r ✓ .��5 Y (•.u'-r� J�.t°• 4i +�! c.: 5. �'- r r e.HEL
�- � �'.- � '•=- -Lr' _ y�°J J•9p �.'.,•ti7t- _ 4:� ' � �� ' �� � '�-af•,*?„ r•F'
I ',i a - n "wJ�� ' � �,�'�' . r- �-J,,,.t i'. 4.� �'Y�i. •:� • Q y �r
- � s •F -cr_- - , �„�;. Jr°' c!'-1 �`°ar7;-. ti��.s•..- fir•
�� i �. / � � `ram � ` _ .1 � R! .:ti.. •�...,>;.. -- - �.. :i7?.-k .: »•:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - FIELD FEATURES
House/well Soil Boring Field Number
(orange (yellow) (yellow)
Buffer Area Field Border
:S
(red) (yellow)
Water (strearn or pond)
(blue)

A F Rl-Al, PHOTOGRI"1111H F.lFt.D FEAT.UYES �����` f
OF{,ir ti,• 11 �a Sc,iI R ink F i 1
�,l("•c I IC,
i (, I d R d o I -
(yE, I
e I- I- C H) 0 V pond)

r+ �^ _ Yam"' 7 +. �G' .9 ^ /LrFr � ^' / e • \ 8 _ 1 1R • .• �i �i.
'.p
' 'j ---• -"� � �� i J ,� ,tom'" ;. `J—_��;;� I � �. -
/1, pa A�j
I III a 1
i
Coe', ►+dcz � 1'
r rtC2 �I 5_�. / a
CcB: �rJ� \ C Nr _,`t T� �' .fir .1/ ��
RaCcl
•^.
i ^�i ` 1— ` �; / :6' 4 , ZxC Y.y \ Cyr• r % '/7
11aU�CeB2 \\"` :'--� �I' .(1 _ 13f eB1r^'/
PeC2' PCB?
- PeC2>•`�-. , _ �. � ,� .� J rv�- ' Q� y �T
J- Ua _GPeC
GB 1 ��V t / GeB2` �..•�e82
�r G 1j P�C2
/ P1 8 \ P• ` /.�f •o Pe62
Ge8'L
`., ,FIELD GD-2 P r
.12.
�= ,; FIELD GD-3 ..;
SPeC2 ' _ vC2-
• t`
_ Ud
R CeB2'
PeB2
FIELD GD-5 y -
fA Pe32 IELD GD
PeB2 _pf� N. GeB2 � •�'' — ""
- D-6 Pe821 FIE D GD-4 t y;
ti cy FIELD G i
.w. \Para *. -
;nB1A P ,� FIELD GD
C2�'
ces
B2' iPeC2 Zw ';.. _ '- <:' Ce92 - 1397 \` -�
CeB2 �"'• I �• - ti3aC���� .� GnC2
9 r..r?
veC7, 1 �• �l11
✓' Pep �_ y � � _�,4
J / GeB2Yrfi�Nu �
Pecz"`-\- {, �`' , .• J,. �'1 () �.J �� I ��✓ ^a. I I I •' �J /yj
I' PlC•� ' f( per; �` \ ��J u ". •� _. — ' J�.l � ,` :�Gl - L / / 4� i�i�J .ice' �/''
a
PROJECT BIO-NOMIC SCALE: i 4-92'
JOB �. 15Fi4-y2-UU5
ff It ►ill', i..,n<i :,aplication SERVICES. INC.
' I :ary Ducr:wnrti. 'rarT, 'SCS Sail Maimin;'
- F16. NO.

_ EAaD i �ttaDS - (jam,'• t�^, y.
eB2 � �� R, -..:�: '�..� �` .i .[� .l';GnC2 '•82S�Z 1 �..
' .'v� .•mot +w'�^=:; - � Sr High _.`��B2 � �' ��n �I' •� � ' �' i
SchoolAW
'�.r _ �i p ' • _
P e 2- � • � :• , � Q 0 r
19 E a+ MToo
`ter'
j
z , .=•'"y.' - I,y aG
IT
j G j ,PeC2" d 'fit' h1dC2+ r t"•-'s',a;�
:.MdB2
_ MdC2:
ChAAll
Grill P -
' 3vA - ";, _ �pG �•' � J MdC2� r- � ' 4 f Ce32 : ---
�) ChA GnCZ M8D F 3 ri i r
nBZ. Gd^Z pa �p{P' J r
_ -Perg i
NPeC2 =
-ZwD '• PeC2 > _. /� '-zcyr
PeBz
_Pr
CeB2 .�
GnBZ
GnC2 PeC2 ` . . • _ �^ _3F.;, Vim' � _ -
�� Ud t�
P
'-
'••-'``- +� �-' a�, � Pe82 -y._ • •-ram''_^ o '... J
G .'� qr• x'
Gn62ChA'= x�P�_� .�� ... �' eB2
zS2' _ _ ZP�C .�^{ "ar: _•: C g PeB2 a Pe82' =^3 {
• GpB2" � .:: � .l _ r �� e_.' ' �x1dj+: ` � . Nam. -i _ .-
__ PeCZ ;c,;_•'' t.p .PeC2
i. _ j'';t' • `G. .m. K. �' '~;ryGn82 _.` y: �,.
�; Wo
�� -- � '- •,z"'wD .� . �Y''�. ;:,,�� Ce82
�Gr�iC2• >• fib. �' �j� .PeC2 �'- ^. <�+ - _. 'r Ce82 - 1397
.n82, � • ��••.: . �' : ••_ :ar !'7W�1••"! Ji- -isS., - � Ce r� - -k ter(^• Y� �= N � `�� '
�n82
GnB
_�G,� �r <<t� ._� - -�%,. r�.. �.a'4:+'..-'_:' j'���Y••
r :Y• PeB"2 i 7
SOIL MAP
SCALE 1:20.000
FARM: (!�A� F I ELDS : g — /o

co
3
Z
I
s
i
I
PROJECT
'�1t. Holly Land Application
Gary Duckworth Farm
LD GD-4 FIELD GD-1
BIO-NOMIC
SERVICES, INC.
FIELD GD-7
PROJECT
'�1t. Holly Land Application
Gary Duckworth Farm
LD GD-4 FIELD GD-1
BIO-NOMIC
SERVICES, INC.
FIELD GD-7
Legend
❑
Abandoned house
//// Buffer
®
Church
■
House
— — —
Property line
w
Well
SCALE. 1"=660' (approx.)
JOB NO:1584-92-005
FIG. PLO: Buffer Map

SOIL BORING
Gary Duckworth Farm
Field GD-10
Soil type: Pacolet Sandy Clay Loam
Depth (inches) Description
0 - 6 Reddish brown clay loam, sticky, plastic.
numerous plant roots. Numerous small mica
flakes.
6 - 12
Same
12 - 18
Reddish brown clay loam, becoming less plastic,
less sticky. Larger mica flakes.
18 - 24
Reddish brown. Drier soil, crumbles easily.
24 - 30
Yellow - reddish color sandy soil. Small
quartz fragments, some small black quartz
fragments. Loose soil, crumbles easily.
30 - 36
Same as above with more yellow color. Soil
very friable.
36 - 48
Same as above, some red iron oxides appearing.
Color becoming more yellow with depth. Very
loose soil, friable, numerous mica flakes.
No ground water or bedrock observed at 48 inches depth.

REPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R246-052 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
Sp
101999
0
ACCT # 46058
SAMPLES
SEND BIO-NOMIC SERVICES
INC
SUBMITTED
BIO-NOMIC SERVICES INC
To:
GROWER: GARY
DUCKWORTH
BY:
516 ROUNDTREE RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
DATE RECEIVED
09/02/99
DATE OF REPORT
09/06/99 PAGE I
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE OF
ANALYSIS 09/03/99
ORGANIC MATTER
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
ACIDITY
C.E.C.
SAMPLE
NUMBER
LAB
NUMBER
ENR
BRAY P1
BRAY P2
K
MG
CA
NA
SOIL
BUFFER
H
lbs./A
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
m RATE pp
pH
INDEX
meq/100g
meq/100g
GD-8
20729
1.7 77L
9 L
13 L
61 L
64 M
410 L
20 VL
5.0
6.7
2.0
4.8
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
SAMPLE
NUMBER K Mg Ca Na H
%
GD-8 1 3.31 11.21 42.91 1.81 40.9
NITRATE SULFUR I ZINC IMANGANESE1 IRON I COPPER I BORON SOLUBLE CHLORIDE MOLYB-
SALTS DENUM MO
NO3 N SO' S ZN MN FE CU B CL
tm RATE ppm RATE ppm RATE ppm RATE ppm RATE ppm RATE ppm RATE ms/cm RATE ppm RATE ppm RATE
59 VH 2. 7 MI 11 MI 19 HI 1 . 7 HI 0 . 2 VL < . 3 V
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the soil.
Explanation of symbols: Values are expressed as % (percent), ppm (parts per million), or Ibs/A (pounds per acre).
Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), H (High), VH (Very High).
ENR — Estimated Nitrogen Release. C.E.C. — Cation Exchange Capacity.
To convert to Ibs/A, multiply the results in ppm by 2.
I;ep the hack nf this rnf)Ort fnr r-nilvr+rclnr+ fnrtn— —rI .nnrr, rinfgilnrl inf—nfir..n
This re s to the sample(s) If
maxim of i day_s after testinq. Soil
C.fNORMAN QN S
by
0.3
Samples are retained a
LSS� prepared by
.►r{/r/ORIES. INC.
r, r'fnn...... I""',

North Carolina Division of Environmental' Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Perrittee: C of wtT fto Il4 ,✓ Contact Person: MA Edd;� �«k•ls � Pwl,�,L c,1o,c.kr �iSc�`la,c
Address of Permittee: Ito 31 s. sT
M-r OltI l., G L i 1 2-0
__-
__List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:
MT 4t. l (y # LA) k o 0 o I S G 3
Site ID Number: M +N
Field Number: 1 ct- �P-
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
see -
of Property used for residual application: "D-e-4.✓- s '0 5 ; f fo Ad
-lessee of Property (if appropriate): R,,.1-3
-and use or cropping patterns: L'o t.,,j s., � .«, Sm'-tt Ro.1,1s -NAM
,_ untended use or disposition of crops: 4,+ f--, 6,,., .,.,.
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits -
C,-Ey ,f ►x tl•rt�
�r hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location .
;shown as described herein -in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
(residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
`Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
j ithe following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
[—',Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
-'� FORM: LAORS 04/94
Page 16 of 19

rr
STIPULATION
The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
! twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
- 3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes tut analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
- and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
61" The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
May be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
-_ 9. The landowner or his eepreseatatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of 'eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
-
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
_ following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
- Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
-_ provisions of this Agreement.
j
FORM; LAORS 02/95 Page 16 of 18

' 14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period followingthe
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be - used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
III
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
I agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
i Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
- place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the tends and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall n
I'of enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
- The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified
by this permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 17 of 18

! i
L
_ f t k••!••# t i t•!••• t R t i i i t• t t• t! R t i i• t t t i f 4 t• f f f# 1 t t t f• f R#
Or
have read this land owner's agreement and do bereby grant pertWssion
to the Permittee to apply sludgehesidual to my lands as specified bwein. ,
i
Land Owner
9- / - C g
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that Al FFd �d
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WnNESS my hand and official seal this day of 19 9S
GKNOTARY-MBLrC
My commission Expires
SEAL:
2--/ -Z'i �,y
t R• i• t•• i k! t t R# f f i t t i 4 t t t t t t f t• t i• f t• f• t R k R t t i i R A k k k t i 4 R
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stioas and restrictions as specified herein.
f
Lessee c�
Date
# t i t R t k• t 4 R• R A i k• 4• t• 4 R k• 4 4 i• t•• t R t t# t•! f R R k t i• i#*•## k t i
I,
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
7-1
�J
Date
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 18 of 18
I�

FARMER - LANDOWNER - FIELD SUMMARY
FARMER FIELD
Roy Stilwell MH 1-1
MH 1-2
Field MH 1-1
CeB2
LANDOWNER
Dennis D. Sifford
Dennis D. Sifford
TOTAL
SOIL TYPES
Field MH1-2
GeB2
PaC
PeC2
ACRES
GROSS
NET
23.3
16.6
28.2
28.2
51.5
44.8
All fields on Page 8 of Lincoln County Soil Survey.
:MHFRMSUM.ALL

ROCK
Z p �ELEMGSCH. e� s z; ao, z I
�,Rfs 16
y 9 B fl.
FORNEY �Y N4� R ,� ,� ice. Loop EAR" g,� g OR OR
R PiR.s".
JrrFLRS DR T f N ?�p SLN.- p-
�a _n � . p
II °AL
CASTLE.40CK
GR AYOD" g C� - xE n
WR �/L�� ° FAy0.'b r r_ .'� x�a0` - . c+
RD
31
Z' �p �'�ti o K/pVi Mts D 4 a e
Kid le HAGERS r° OLD �to
y IRISTOP ER +,
V PINK
W I - D. DOGWOOD N •� �.
r
rr 14u,,,�ACE y sAW°U
HICK R Lk gC
_ v_
�FKE
H° tI G S FEx
G-�_ 2� {
Lh..i .
i _NET Do FI NCOLN 2r ' Q�e 0. e(j
�Cl w or fr^ LFAK LN� R�'`"�'
MIDDLE a
Q JLr♦. IW I '�o,. E, / 9 OIri
a o \P/ GQoQO P sr clue 4r r s.R GIL DE u
/ I ¢ TIMBER R l� TR. I JSE ".. Lit.
y� .73 %o� m ria �i'Js ix BCD H°PG G
c �L,RD RD. DENVER-- \� i �pK 5 e P �fRCR
CK`ERS _ ZO EAST _ e°' so P ^`,"n� ra� RO oeo:
. RD. +c f I i • 7
.- ACRES Z J H r
.. m
�O• F. mm ���,Qt� �A�E CATAWBA 4 16 BELL
SPRINGS FgpM �•a,
yl 4� z P ELEM.SC, - `k o x'
O>c BROOK171ps; cD DENM K
DR�-
A
9 `SRO. ICP�EK FOREST " iCGH _ Ln 0.
Machpelah ��° EAST LINCOLN Cr
1 Uy L4R/��aGH SCH. m ° ,� r 3 5� B Lta
L ,� a@= Sum
�''<F"��0 73 W r iC ORD 'A" oW" rc a
¢t `"
f.0 a. v� C tl WDESTtN
rp, EORv s
x g•/ 9 "� \C�\. v? ti �� HPG„ TyER L".
__ AcR O t � -� C C RO <§. �"SR• FREST'`N' I
J +.
ArTTI � a 1� i' •�
Lp z APO �5 ��w o 1�c HF� BERRY SaCM
OPL C'5FQl�
CLU DR
DI VTR
� • sit - ��
I RJMFEL, \ D DUA_I RYGPC�° PO ST {
gS4f R.
-TGOLD y� VE
�o-
4 1 a 0. �•( n i 16 f0 "�t�- E. IY M�
I L� Q°' � d•I'+. A y r HILL 5\f RD O H 6 G �,L 0• S��-�S DDW
Cn. BL E
QtiI i Rn RD el LN- �0 urns aW .°�� 3
9� CEP 1 )1ptLO W a r i s Q 0 CE BROOK 2r� vll Vt
zCkgSE RD. CLINTNOOD DER y "� �plh qUL 3 -
t ICN f. O`'P PQ�a 4 MILL RD) ORO'` LCS svi l le CAx � FART-,I.i
z h
1 Q. 4 S -� yf GLE" MdNTOSH RD. WOOD
47 �.t 10 TR.
7`1GOS
UNT-y'-- _ 0 0
—�� FJ+ I MBERBROOK R.
I — —
i
LOCATION MAP
FARM: JoL4 FIELDS: ! -

Marna _
cm
4 \ Clem Ck' ,__
w - Cours
822 � •� c✓� \ �
ter.--�./' _-
/ .
717
!
Marthas'
72b
.(•—� `-
3921
II .
l
� •'\'`' \ `�C��� ` - - Cowans'Ford
`� \'! .` SArb
s:a,^.On'.\sland
110
3920
<
777
ubstation /j \�'. 1Sifford�
Island
728
25'3919
j -
l Co.
761
TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE 1.24.000
BLUE COLOR INDICATES WATER
Pond or lake c�3 C-
�� Stream or river
i
-' Intermittent stream
r FARM: Roo S4.1wL11 h'1i{ 1 FIELDS: � � a

' <"•��J. V� ` _ _• "e+1�. � �`- � ti�1 `i�1 -�,4•C 7i`� �+,�q i"�" ���^ .a'�' �e �•'•7fry-:'
_ -.•'
zz
°'`'�' �' �A_i ,� a7 ,� l�;�`^^Y�1,S��J�� ,.Y` '!M.ii� may', • -�.:� ' � .
AA
-'•Rk
�� Wit, - "rri' �y ��•ti i;` 4d
:YAS� •�J•� -: 4b � '< �• `?`•IS'�'���.-�4� �'• •�'" �T• /'i:.: '�!•�.�^Jifti n •f � Wryer! L"a\ nr M.��`�
An
�Llk—�r v\ \'Ki j ^ ` 1 ..,� i.,; I / '-^'..,t�.�C'- •:1''�'-3+,�J� r`�'a_y. �-A
i��. ;�� �,-. c`a�-f^` "ice l 4a• ?: L j :�^�-.i�:,y,}•' �,s`� � ,%,rl� -�JA� �� `"� Y`�- � ix - Y
,- � . -r't _ ''� ' a•'�'it G•., ` `tL�ai '3'LY]?S.s �..�: L� ` `I� �� �~ipP.' 1 •k p�' ••f}. ��� � � -
'i _ :�,-�`.sv+}{'!t.,:.'R�.• n�•1'�y�,t�;sC�`^q✓�i.'� ••''y +iS '.` .Ili �;1"� S'r+�'.. 'S!`:�.��• ':-i-.r< �T.
'y ,-t-.Ai � \ "i. rt�:' .. "ate-,' •{; �
It
QV
�• � tiaS. T. r .a; �.. �a :`�N _. �' ..i : �r QQ' �' cif` y � 4 1^, x i.
'fir$ :•`'t .? s •L. .� rFS,k'sa'v' ;,� �j � ,��-
�-� � ��iH.:-%' -'tl •. '� ` 1• '<1'�'i• ? �-�1 t _n� a Ya?�, �-� %�j �,.t7re--+�' a
L'
iry (emu/ (►a"�
qu
ZZ
it
/�' �r ._ b'-•. •- :t :a
o.
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH _ FIELD FEATURES
wel
House/well Soil Boring :.Field Number
(orange (yellow) y(yellow)
Buffer Area Field Border
(red) (yellow)
Water (stream or pond)
(blue)
---,- O o c:�:)

.f \ Lwr�-"�`""a..,= yv.t�. .�'6j� }� V'�I..'=''y,. ;� �'�y/�• "':�.E7 r; lti�4�Fi:=:+s•.
-Q] r i/ .f. � 2 �ia�, I t Y_ �_'�F 7:..-� r -'="'•,+V( i�`{gip-�•`" '7:- ..p„ T^-': L; .:..
r'rj a 4- Gn8 ; 139J �'' _ �F1 ' s�± - •� '�-9�„'
sz. r~._.
z• ''�\ .,. 1� >r'` .�. ��ti a e�2 �--�j...Z�.>:'T _ •y 1t� �• '":Y
• al. ^ a: y U .4 . (�z", aCr}z., s. !_ yi�de;,T-k{`��.7.rL •�'
i GnB2 Pec; > l395
.� '.c k:� ';�, m. � � h 0.•.L 0 +� ChA ;�u a .� \ rr, ;3£t'ati 's �.X_'•._
:A. — - i� ! •cicSs 73 ate PeC7, a`n�.,-•�.,> '<e:N_;-...moo t.r.` :•}
-� �(. �•r - �.'A-i- •S ,1,;. - - A 4 •1 �r _ CeB2 .... .�-,. r •� r jy.r•" .
Ce$�
� �'s-• � ' t t •}'![ � •..fir �- \\ �/:cr Y �- .✓ i � r �•-•
'. t •._•py ', P• � • -_ � CLB _ +�. +: /-� �r•y.r},> >.•.!k^�'T. ry'.,`a,'.`..
2eG2 rr 4, ;ie 35fi Qai y PeG � IUd .: / wr��-v : � �'. •ic.
,,,t='! ; _; .rry, J.lr _� - ., ,.�., _1• ...c. m• o"T,' `'� 4 �i'r'r.+.s•�sayj'.'.�,14(`:
:�.p av_ t ¢mot •�!„✓ N C�+� -^ y + �8-f�„t' hr�-r` .•f L o--,rE a - r'� %c?:.-
c¢�'-`•¢�ryV �•'n`. , - 'lam; ♦ . -... 1 �? "�.vf`^�....r. .'L - {w' •'�rr� - _ Yc ..•..
CeB2
q Pe 2
k eC2 1 e_ � \ a ,+ s d CoWans Ford
'
ISi and \ °�'' .- - .• _
�epY 3 j _ aka^ •2. •+ -J- •.
` -Q. it '�. � "� 1+� G� 1 •.i,'�r � • '�. ._ w.-��! .._ - . �� ', -. �, e ~• -
��> r Q ' ✓ �V. CeB2
�'i }fib J-l.~ s5. � ` �r �, ��� M � � _.7 -`. I' _ •. '�; Z ,..��\�.r
.�.,�:�•'.• t Gn62 rI• .I[ yr �t �'` -, V ,r �_.c.
Ce62
+ZWc -
• 1 ' . � ate. t4;.--� rG�. - "r,� +. , h: -
GnC
- ;'ram •y;..� : '' -.+ _ 1' � ,. Gafl�`' _ r - •1' - � ' C, ! .. � �Gti i . ,,^ `� °' a c' ,t�
- GnB241
f. �`Hd y j . 1396 •GnC e :y+( - '+j=..�.
SOIL MAP
SCALE 1:20000
FARM: Wl-IFIELDSZ

SOIL BORING
Roy Stilwell Farm
Field: MH 1-2
Soil Type: Cecil Sandy Clay Loam
Depth (inches) Description
0 - 6 Dark red sandy clay loam, friable. Specks of
black quartz fragments. Numerous plant roots.
6 - 12 Brownish red sandy clay loam, friable. Some
red oxide specks. Some black quartz fragments.
12 - 15 Same
15 - 22 Increasing clay content, slightly plastic, some
yellow streaks.
22 - 30 Sandy clay, friable, increasing quartz
particles.
30 - 48 Same
No ground water or bedrock observed at 48 inches depth.

REPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
RC97-C29 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 •,[phone]
Fax No. (804) 6f jai
SEND EIO-NOIMIC SERVICES INC
TO:
516 ROUNDTFEE R+D
CHARLOTTE RC ZE217
DATE OF REPORT C4108/98 PAGE 1
ROY STILLWELL
GROWER:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
A C CT #► 46058
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED BIO-NOMIC SERVICES INC
BY:
DATE RECEIVED 04/06/98
DATE OF ANALYSIS 04/07/98
ORGANIC
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
Cation
PERCENT
SAMPLE
LAB
MATTER
HYDRO-
Exchange
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
Pi
P2
K
Mg
Ca
Na
SOIL
BUFFER
NUMBER
NUMBER
••
(Weak Bray)
(Strong Bray)
GEN
H
Capacity
C.E.C.
%
%
%
%
%
% ENR
RATE lbs./A
ppm-P RATE
ppm-P RATE
ppm-K RATE
ppm-Mg RATE
ppm-Ca RATE
ppm-Na RATE
pH
pH
meq/100g
rneq/100g
K
Mg
Ca
H
Na
1 -1
143 4
• 2.3 911M
22 P
28 H
71 H
63 M
350 L
5.3
6.8
1.1
3.6
5.4
4.7
8. 9
1. 0
1-2
11435
. 2.4 92H
18 i
23 L
69 M
80 IH
490 .NII
5.9
6.9
0.7
4.0
4.5
16.8
51.6
7.1
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
MOLYB-
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE
NUMBER
NITRATE
NO3
ppm-No3 N
RATE
SULFUR
S
ppm-S RATE
ZINC
Zn
ppm-Zn RATE
MANGANESE
Mn
ppm-Mn RATE
IRON
Fe
ppm-Fe RATE
COPPER
CU
ppm-Cu RATE
BORON
B
ppm-B RATE
EXCESS
LIME
RATE
SOLUBLE
SALTS
mmhos/cm RATE
CHLORIDE
CI
ppm-CI RATE
DENUM
Mo
ppm-Mo
RATE
%
SAND
%
SILT
%
CLAY
SOIL
TEXTURE
1-1
12 M
1.6 L
2t H
18 H
1.7 H
0.4 L
1-2
65 WH
2.1 L
.1i 16
21 H
1.7 H
0.4 L
This report plies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained
thirty days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
?maximu
&L N AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.A
R ES

i
North Carolina Division of Environmental' Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Der-nittee: A o i l 4 •J L
i
1 -)ntactPerson: /d,( 6"t A)ICADIs
:address of Permittee: P. 0. R ob 1 31s, a�a sT
-� kT 44o (l ,i c aS(z0
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:
1
Site ID Number: 1444 -0-
Field Number: / - &
i
r_ocation of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Sce. AffAc ktJ MAP z z.4tn of-F o'J Xe 414-1 e
Owner of Property used for residual application: M k' I LA4 -
�� lessee of Property (if appropriate): J
Land use or cropping patterns: .xA j t- Pj0 5AJA.A.
intended use or disposition of crops: Aw,';� Ftwa
the undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
d '4 -f MT of
�iereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
�L-hown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The
�-',andowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
i_ residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
_disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
nvironmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
j'he following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
� Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
if
FORM: LAORS 04/94 Page 16 of 19

STIPULATIONS•
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by.the residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
,i representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural .Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will fiunish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
61" The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
May be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Peimittee of any revisions or modifications to the
intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Pemiittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
-' access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land b
ird
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the t hrms
is
and conditions of thus Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
FORM; LAORS 02/95 Page 16 of 18

i
-- 14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
f agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified
by this permit, is prohibited.
••••*s••••w•*•w••••••,�••w•••w••,••w•••,�w*••••*•♦••ww•••w
--~, RESTRICTIONS:
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 17 of 18

- Y • 4 • i ! • Y 4 t * i i ! • • i • * ! i R • • • • • R # R ! R i i • Y # Y 4 R i Y * t Y R' * * * ♦ • t Y t * #
t t, 14Alz- L i C- M _ �{ i y� have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission
to the Peratittee to apply sludgetresidual to my lands as specified herein.
.I
Land Owner
- Date
NORTH CAROLINA,
LL n COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that C-ka.r (,-� in
,personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WrrNESS my hand and official seal this day of s7 3I 19 _
0&11 CA--, _ � , �i�-�
NOTARY PUBLIC, • l
My Commission Expires
SEAL,:
R R R i i 4• R* k• i i* k** k R• t*** i* Y R• k R k*** i* R R R** t i* i i R k* k k* 4 i*
have read this laud owner's agrw=t and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specMed herein.
Date
�-� t k i• R• R• i i# k R* R* i 4! t! R R k• 4 t i i 4•• t t t k# i i i t R t k# k• k• R t R Y k t k
have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Pennittee .
Date
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page IS of 18
I,'
i.J

SOIL BORING
Charlie M. Killian Farm
Field MH 2-2
Soil type: Cecil Sandy Clay Loam
Depth (inches)
Description
0 -
6
Brown loam, friable, loose,
crumbles easily.
numerous plant roots.
6 -
12
Dark red clay, sticky, plastic.
Some mica
flakes.
12
- 18
Same to 16 inches. Changes
to reddish color
with streaks of yellow -orange
color and
flakes of red iron oxide.
Some black quartz
fragments.
18
- 24
Same color, soil becomes
very sticky and
plastic.
24
- 30
Red clay, same as above.
30
- 36
Same
36
- 48
Red clay loam, becoming
less sticky and
plastic. Somewhat friable,
crumbles. Drier
soil at this depth.
No ground water or bedrock observed at 48 inches depth.

REPORT NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 16 2 - 017 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond Virginia 23237 • [phone]
r
Fax No. [phone] 14 L
Lujl(;
•� ACCT B 46058
SAMPLES
SENDS IO-NOMIC SERVICES INC CHARLES KILLIAN SUBMITTED BIO-NOMIC SERVICES INC
TO: GROWER: BY:
516 ROUNDTREE RD
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
0G/15/99 1
DATE OF REPORT PAGE
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE RECEIVED 06/10/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 06/11/99
ORGANIC MATTER
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
ACIDITY
C.E.C.
SAMPLE
NUMBER
LAB
NUMBER
� ENR
BRAY P1
BRAY P2
K
MG
CA
NA
SOIL
BUFFER
H
lbs./A
ppm
RATE
ppm RATE
ppm
RATE
ppm RATE
ppm
RATE
ppm RATE
pH
INDEX
meq/100g
meq'100
H-2-2
07845
3.5 109M
45 VH
64 VH
212
VH
150 VH
1000
M
16
VL
6.2
6.8
0.9
7.E
H-2-4
D7846
5.1 140VH
26 M
43 H
70
L
115 H
720
M
19
VL5.8
6.8
1.1
6.0
H-2-5
7847
3.1 105M
33 H
41 M
80
M
75 M
660
M
27
VL
6.1
6.9
0.7
4.c
I
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC
MANGANESE
IRON
COPPER
I BORON
SOLUBLE
CHLORIDE
MOLYB-
SAMPLE
K
Mg
Ca
Na
H
NO3 N
SOa S
ZN
MN
FIE
CU
B
SALTS
CL
DENUM M
ms/cm RATE
ppm RAI
NUMBER
%
%
ollo
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
H-2-2
7.0
16.0
64.0
0.9
12.1
27 VH12.4
VH
125 VH
134
VH
5.2 VH
0.6
M
0.3
VL
0.5
H-2-4
3.0
16.1
-0.5
1.4
19.0
22 VH
8.4
VH
52 VH
70
VH
3.7 VH
0.5
L
<.3
VL
0.3
H-2-5
4.2
12.7
7.0
2.4
13.7
14 H
9.8
VH
90 VH
77
VH
5.0 VH
0.5 L
f.3 VL
0.5
.
I
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the soil.
Explanation of symbols: Values are expressed as % (percent), ppm (parts per million), or Ibs/A (pounds per acre).
Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), H (High), VH (Very High).
ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity.
To convert to Ibs/A. mUltiply the results in ppm by 2.
This report ppI'es
to the ample(s) tested Samples ire•ela,neo
maximum I (hvty days alter tes(ing. Soil Analysis prepared h�
8 A ERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES. INC.
NO N N S
hV

FARMER - LANDOWNER - FIELD SUMMARY
FARMER FIELD
Charlie M. Killian Sr.
MH 2-1
MH 2-2
MH 2-3
MH 2-4
MH 2-5
ACRES
LANDOWNER GROSS NET
Charlie Killian Sr. 38.1
Charlie Killian Sr. 31.4
Charlie Killian Sr. 19.6
Charlie Killian Sr. 12.6
Charlie Killian Sr. 17.4
& Melanie Jones
Charlie Killian Sr. 16.2
& Charles Killian Jr.
TOTAL 135.3
SOIL TYPES
Field MH 2-1 Field MH 2-2 Field MH 2-3
CeB2
CeB2 CeB2
PaD2
PaE PeC2
CH
Co MdC2
Co
CH
WkD
Map 1 Gaston Co. Map 1 Gaston CO. Map 7 Lincoln Co.
Field MH 2-4 Field MH 2-5 Field MH 2-6
33.3
30.$
19.6
12.3
16.7
15.2
127 .2-
CeB2 CeB2 CeB2
WkD PaD2
MdC2 WkD
Map 1 Gaston Co. Map 1 Gaston Co. Map 1 Gaston Co.
5 &
Map 7 Lincoln Co. Map 7 Lincoln Co.
The Gaston/Lincoln County line passes through Fields MH 2-4 and
MH 2-5.
:MHFRMSUM.ALL

. . . . . . ........... .. M 25 R.06� ............ S It, A — Or .................. is� SI.................... - " . ­_ . _'
. a
.... ........ —P 16 Ridgewood St. ........... ... 0 e9 Rasr»or Ln ............ k 6 S Y.'es:sf .... . .... .... - .. R 15
..
_.:....—P 14 Rid,ng.Rd...................... N 25 Rosewo.d r-,i .................. N 18 S Cherry St ............ ..... -.16
IS Riding Trail Rd :. S 19 SosinvooC Ln................. 016 Sabra.Sf .. . ................._S 20
21 Riley Cf ........................... 016 POse"o"' SI ......... ........ IJ. 25 S.= E.t .................... _R-25
0 2A. Riley Rd . ... ..... :2D Ross Rd. _ ..................... 1 13 Sacco SI . ..... ......... A 25
T 16, River Cf.:." ..: .............. 1 ..1215 Rest, Fla . .................. m I I Samlinerii, 0...............T 19
21 River 01 . ..............:...:......5 27, Reis Rd .......................5 11 S,,odfnogir Cf.. ........... . . H-4
25 Rivit, Loop Rd ................ P27 Ross SI.._.......................0 15 S-00i"o-d 01 ............... W 17
............ ='c 20 River Rd ..........................K 29 18.1a" St ................. T :5 Sadler aver...................._ M-27
­­.— S IS River Rd :......................_.P 27 RouserCf ........... I ­P 20 S-Mill Rd........................ F 22
...... U 19. River Rd ::::'w 25 Rowan
24 Rives RidgeOr -.T C . ...................... T-7 S.� m At, . ....................... N
19
27 Flavor R— 0........:_.... T 23 Saia 0......................... 14
18
Rivet Si:.....: ...... ........... :d 16 So-. Sl- ............. v 23 Sa,emwew Rd Y 16
21. River Si ...... ..........:..........S 27 R-. Sl- .................... :.W 23 S.lioa 0 . . .......... S20
�1.: 4_0'14 River St Eat
..... ­* *' '­ :) G 16 Rowland . .................... V :2 San. Brown Rd................ u 23
U 13 Riventioll Dr.. ................. T 17 Roue Ln . .................... .. V 24 Sam Ferguson Rd.......... _X 13
. ..-.. ........... _U 18 Riverside Dr .................... _13t Ro-y Rd ......... ................ Pull S., Paulo L . .................. 0 n
,___....:._P 21 Riverside Dr ................*'024 Roy................................0 iS
Sand L . ........ .......... . _P 24
..........__09 Riversides Or .....................S24 Roy Ea-4- Rd..................G 7 Sand wedge Ur.............. U19
P 10. Riverside
SI....................P.Z2
Roy Eaw Rd ; ...... . ..... H 6 Sandcastle Rd.................:. 20
13 - Riverip, PI.:...............X 22 Roy St .. . ....................... 015. Sandhurst Cf ................ :..o 19
13 Riverview AV . ........ R 27 Royal Ln .. . ..................... H 15 Sanoijvood Or_ .......... . .C) 19
_____H 7 Riverwpod kwy.: U IS Royal Oaks Ln,:.. .:......0 21 Sandf;wood D ................. . A 19
. ..... —121 Roalfrunner Or ............... :T 16 Ruby Ave..,...:..................R 17 Sandy Creek Or
.............. U 14
19 Robletris-St ............ 015 Ruby Lh .......................... J 11 Sandy Cc......................... j 18
I . . ....... _.H 6 Robbins St ......................0 22 Ruby Ln ........................... R 20 Sandy Ford Pd ................. j 25
'.A 25 Robert Abram Dr.:.::.V 23 Rudd Rd...._ ................. ­S 18 -Sauey Fold Rd.............._! -26
_JA 20 Rebell Keever Ad G27 Rudis,11 Rd ......................... 1 12 Savoy Ford Rd ................ L 27
. ......... �I 21 - Robk Ad ........... G 6 Audsilf St.................... ..... H 6 Sandy Ln ........... 1 ............ . =1 20
.......... _T is
........... w___P 21
............. . -016 . .. ............ 17
.. ......... -016
241 25 26'
............. _Cl 24
.......... -026 . ........... L-LP 22
.._._....__0 20
.. _..._..:,.:0.IS MAP 3
.............. 116
_G 13
. . ....... -017
.................. Ole
16
... ............ x 72
....... ...... _X 23 ... ....... . Y23
_.._...._-T 18 400
... ....... -U IS -
26
.j .. ............ U 26
. ......... .... ;...W 12
............ L 20
.. . ......... _.L 21
-is
........... V-s 11
10 z
. ............ . A20 M
.......... K 18
­- ------ ---­------ V1 1267 M
.......... J 28 oodhurst
14 0
KIS
....... .... .... Wits
R 21m.
........ .,_S 21
*_ S21
il . . .......... K 20
�. . ...._.....a 18 .__'
.N 23 Bddl'Pwood . ..._..A 20
......... ... 09
........... U 12
P 24
.......... X 27 .. .. ......... X 27
. . .......... V 20 ............S 22
........... S22 Dutch
._.........R 21 Hollow
.. . . ......... 02 1
._._...........a n : -"
............... R i 8
.......R 25
..........S 25
R 2; Rd
. ....0 '
..............0 20
.­ ........... H 5 Farm Hill C'
. ..... . ....... H 5 Acres Rmerbend
"0 !7
020 Acres
............. *'S !7
0 24
0 .9
YS
_.­ . .... ........................
Sh.o, Ln .............
Shad
.
U 18
South Point Rd
I to
W 27
DiayF~3aS �a.
St.,.,,.?s Re
T *5
i
5.9-1 Sprang Rd.
S,,gg, SI
R 21
Ttr,
Te
i_,i ...........
Shady Ln
...... .... VIS
South Point Rd....__
A 27
�Sa­n .,v25
T - 9
SullivanShAve . .... ............
P.1 7
T.-
....................
Shady Oat Tr ...
_X IS
............ S13
South St : ............
South St .......... ..
... _1 16
...R 17
Sla�
St—Ir -a Flo
'121
25
S.11rvari Or .......... _..
Sulphur Branch Or
.. ..17
J 12
T ';`
Te
Shacry'P-m Cf
Sh.dyacst Cf
08
South St
Southbo CI
T 25
Slau' . -Y Pd...
1 27
...........
Summer 0
.R 16
Tel.-
Shaggy B.'% CI...............T
24
S . yrne .... .. .
Southern Farm Flo .......
..... N 24
... X 20
.
S;. .? Ro­_.1
S ar ey, Rd
j 2.2 .
j 25
Surrim., Glen Dr...;
Summer Ff._
X 21
T­ -
ShallowDod Ln... ..............
Shalom OL
R 21
L IS
1., the- SI ...: ..................
Scuthooint Ce,
S 25
. . ..........
SIW try Ad . .........
K 2A
Si�mrfifllo-_Rd ...........
Y 22
K 21
Te-
Te,;t,
.................
Shamrock Ad .................
:0 24
.......... ........
Southridge Dr i : ..........
T 25'
i..T 25
Sifu­ -y R_ .... ....... ..... I.M 13
Sianey Saircor Mn Ad_'A 22
Summers PI ...................
Surenut
... H 4
25
T,,,c;.
The
Shane.Ad ...........
Shannon Dr .......:............:5
............ L-26.
t8
Sk)ulhs-de Ave.....:.........
South, -de Church Rd..
S 16
V 15
Star-" 5
Sla's-
:7
................ : ...........S
Summit Ave:.:..................0
27
L­
The
Shannon D, :
............ T 25
Southwood 01 ..................
T 21
S:a,!,e
I� ..
5
summit st-
Sumner Rd
R 16,
P 23
Theo,:
Ths- •
Shannon Ad ....................
Shannon Ridge
K 16
W 17
Sp�;ght Cf ...............
Spanish Oak Ln
. :.T 17
U Is
Stan' Ac . ............... .
*.,...;.-v
siar4r;-. :r
.. :.:W 12
Sumner Rd.� ...............
P 23
The,:
Shannon-13radley. Rd 014
Sharon
Spargo St ........... ___,M
18
. .........
Slaw,.-., 5..........:. .........
13
J �2
Sun Dr..............:..:.. •
Sunbeam Farm Rd.
M 16
18
Then
The-..
Ave .......................
S
Sharon Ave .....................0
1.18
il
Spargo St ............. .....
Sparrow Dairy Rd
M 23
W 17
Stan 5: � .. .. .............
Sta, St.
N ! S
11
Suncles, Rd
19
Thom.
Sharon Avg ......:..............0
20
. .
Sparrow Springs Rd....
.....
S to
........................
Sla— :, � ...................
N
V 7,
Sunderland Fid ................
Sunflolvor CI_......:......,...
V 27
U 12
The -
Then:
Sharon Ln:.......................S
Shaw Ave
is
Sparrow Spnrgs Rd
V 10
Sjan­ . . ..........
.9
Sunny Ln
H 9.
The,. --
.......................:R
Shaw Sl ............
21
:.: P 25
Sparrow Sprmgs Rd
Sparrow Springs Rd
VII
X I I
Slat, SI..j.
. . ... . ............. G !6
- .
...........................
Sunlyside Shifdy Rest
Rd _..M 6
Thorn
.....
D. ............ R 20,
. ......
Sparta CC .. .......:...:....:...014
Slat,�. � .... q ...........
slabol
P -9
sunrryside Shady Rest
Ad M 8
Thorn::
Shrilby Hwy
.............. J 3
Spencer A ve .....
020
. ............0
Slta�� -xr Rd ..............
24
29
Sunray ...........
Sunrise Dr..:
J 12
S IS
Thorn-
Shenandoah Or......:........014
Shepherd
Spencer Ave ...........
* ...........
R 16
Sieipc-.- '-c ..; .............
�j
:.L 15
.. ............
Sunset
S 2S
Thor -
Tho,t
St ....................
Sheridan Cf..
U 22
Spencer Min Rd
N 21
Slee.Pc ........
0 '1
...................
SunsotAvo ......................
0 14
Thorn
...................
Shoringhani Dr ..............
P 17
..M 20
Spencer Min Rd ....... ..
Spoitcor Min Rd..............P
' 0 21
P 20
sle�. 9 :) . .. ....... ...
Slee�. S:
1 0
Sunset Cir._, ......... ........
M 17
Thor,
Sherman St. ....................
Sherrill Or_
R is
. Spencer Woods Of �
J 21 '
........... : ..........
Sjo�_ ......... ..
K
_U 23
Sunset D . ......................
SurIsol Or ........................
�..J 22
010
The,. -
7.lim�i
.......... .............
1 2 1
Spinners Dr.............:..
:._._.I 6
Sun -I Dr..
019-
Tin,
27
Carmel Woods
LOCATION MAP
FARM.: L4y42iC.s 1-1, FIELDS:
U.
Keever Es:zm:
L Freen Hans :tl
LUCIA
p6
II
Cf
Foz Trail
AW Flu
Ot
Byp
C% 16 "1
Heather Ridge

--.''III �_.. -_ {� ,\� � �,• �^ �' \ � ._ � _� �- ��. � ,
_ _� i •��-J,. III• •\,�\: ,�� -J _ .,
TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE 1.24.000
BLUE COLOR INDICATES WATER
Pond or lake (ZO p.
Stream or river
Intermittent stream —.
FARM: (34riAle-S M.. Ksll-AM M-H a FIELDS:

L i
X
A/
f, To
3
•
I- Y -, -
Ap
- - �.. '� z y'. � � ~'�-!?,.9�", :r ' �X •-r . r'"� t'j �' ti''�, y�'hu n�_ f�ti�' f . y _� , ?y:�:
w2
zzi
. . . . . . . . . . . . .......
42.
j-h
qS 01,�-
P. L
4'S
•Y.r '•.S. -fit �- ,��'��j�•- ,�7, - '�"'�•j'� '. _- _ K. .' •r�."�}[�_- 9� �'X �,S •n.1
7�t �QQ
, 1 050;1
-,—tz
P-
;Y4 (!W
-7A4
F
i's
. ;T'llf j A
D X
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FIELD FEATURFS
So i I B o r i n e Fi-I xlmlhor
o.r a n e®(ye]ow) (yrl 10
Buffer Area F i Id Border
(red) (e I I ow
Water (stream or pond)
C D L

PaD CnA—
i ,'D r � PeC2 PaD � : �'-�3. ram. •, Q� -. -'S- .r.¢t
1 y'_
Gn62 �-a' `s�'s.•.
GnC2;PeC2'
1 ` i. r- -Rn Z: �•, PeC2Y .t .,�.. is �5.. R;..�,�` ,,J., -s•« �+� .-='� -
Pa
Gn8�.7 ,
GrtCA
Gn82
' 1/ � PeC2 � •• �„ ..: `. Y .
eC2
,,. 5 GnC2
• � �Qa .Ce82 � � `+.:T C"I~ � � ��.
"hA
45
eCZ PeC2 r \�} r+.
P�J.� .ti. � p� ``��- ..:., - i:m Gn82 J - •'-'
eBM••.
I - --` �,4vA .� ;':�' 4 .� < .car •� 'f' _. �;::: ,.r ::>. ZwQ � z ,C .�v'• Ce82 yy+'t '.'.:�_
iPaD {t' '-� Qa0 j . - rv. 11• :�• `OCi `t*a. _ .'- t�:'. v, G•(` r �c,y^ .
4 ti ChA PeC2ry; f m ^ . _ �' i''�' .� ti,; C'• GAB iPeC2
- a PeB2 ,� -V GnC2• - C?• ,t:
�.. *.. � ," �': 5• � a `' �: y, � Gn82 •. ': _ ��
P C
Ce82
c ChA
_ -- - '_PaD' ., PaD j � _t- 7 " i`..:•�ss�.: ,- . �•1 � -
Ce82`
P'aD P`r, '. ee�2 /2 ••�, `fir_' ry Pe 2
LV
� - •� •' :::y.: y� _ ••' _,.,; ' - PaC•• c+ "� Ce82
i d! r%J' •�.. -r d .J �P_ u' .•o-• 'f' ,s+c� �'d+ �: - '� G/ -.`Gn ..;:_c;•�� --. =;.�'
c '� +`� G Gn82 • 5,: aa';�, ., tg5 / 82
J� "� .;.e � � •' ..r,'• -✓•ei• _ d.�t,�•..•'<a '�.-
-
PeC2 .t - r: �� ,+ •. G� �� {.x J M�f -
C='-
RnC
�` - _ — .� L — �(. S+ :, ti•;�".�� .ei~... Pam' "•j—�
.'y Pe '•. .•} .:.� ,L Chi rya+,"�z r•�'`..`.- - P .�-�
We.... ,' _ - .. _ y , 's -: • , r . x 2"e k PeC2 oT' _ _ • '.._ `-`"••;�'`,i`
.P _ ° a CeB 2 ' 7. .��•'� •a :'� -•••.P ..: �.� �• � ©i�`y .'Ta'��ri'^�"` .—..._ -v.. .Pa���
e - .� � ;:- - . '.:.. i .ea 6rH .,. •+ ...� 6 sr. .CH PaIIZ 2c, 7ro � •' .�
fit» ,�' Q ��N,ww _.�� Aix ' +;�• �yJ��1 _ .s•.'�'��.- 'fraE-'1:r."
4 e� ! -e82 �� C Pap C' ri'r�.i► H O' ; "x r _
�_ f ., • � •~'• _.� •` _ �: _Y✓ c: -. �= Via►;; 4v � CH i '-`C - a,
_.+�: y* c ;g�`' C H 4 FFA 'F' -s'f r ,�• �' Ma6� `-rF= .a� ��� - . .
'y����... - 'Q.+r "�.'.r�'-•' - .Fr • �: y'+' _ - r� • +'�2. -c� :.c' 4x.. nC���` -�- Co . `'�^ ` ^"'.. �a� P '0'�"
T`Y - r 9 C
a�L:Pa r: Q �•p ~ kQ7=• GaB2 t .CH �.� :. � •r-� • CI+. - Q
1
i
l�
SOIL MAP
SCALE 1:20,000
FARM : C'yAzl! Wt k• It!,4,J MK FIELDS: /—
;i

f
North Carolina Division of Environmental' Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: if,+, of wi-r tto ltti .✓ c-
'ontact Person: MA Edd j<
Address of Permittee: P. o o s-r
m-r tle I t., G LY 12-0
-i_ist of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:
C:4:� of MT 4W11 — P<AK, At LL) 000 18& 3
i
l
Site ID Number: M fj 3
Field Number:
_Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
off SC4Ao ce. Rd /jem AzTe.c. Rd — 5te A-HV-4<J MAP
Owner of Property used for residual application: Cp,c N j tom( A 1I
lessee of Property (if appropriate): sa.,c
Land use or cropping patterns: +LA
tended use or disposition of crops: F <C'-1
i_ -Jbe undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
1 e -A-%. of k1 T i{o t t 4
lereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location
Shown as described herein 'in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below_ The
'landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied
residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land described above for the
disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of
� L_Fenvironmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each time the land application
permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with
�L!Lj he following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
r1
�lodficadon of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
_} Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LAORS 04/94 Page 16 of 19

STIPULATIONS;
I !
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Pe-rmittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual application
- and to established monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, Countv and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior to
commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning
the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes an analysis of
constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns
and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will Ru-nish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each soil
analysis.
61- The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application. Residuals
I may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied
to achieve a final pH of the lone, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the
i intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee
to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the
NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee w:111 determine residual
application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of 'eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
i 10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee or
r Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
- 12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the la nd by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies withbh
and conditions of this Agreement e terms
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comly with all
provisions of this Agreement. p
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 16 of 18

if
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
l�
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
— 15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty ( 30 ) day period following the
residual application. Application sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be
used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
i.
( _!
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
i agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner that
_ gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpof
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under se o
leachate.
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals specified
by this permit, is prohibited.
• R i R• t R i i t• R A!•• R• i•• i i• R R i• R R A A A• R R R• t•• i 4•• R i R A R R R i i R R
R E IQI
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 17 of 18
i�

_ • t! f••• f• t i•• f••• t• t• A• f•• Y f# f• i••• t• t i f f f• f f Y• f i•• 4 f f t f I
t' �1
yg r lj 1\1P1*;4 1 ��_�/ have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant
o apply sludgehesidual to specified lands as s permission
to the Pemlee t
bcrcin.
�J
r
Land O r
�1- /- gy
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, _ / �� �i•% COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that - �le /V'
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
Wr'INESS my hand and official scal this day of / 19 s
NOTARY PUB11C
My commission Expires Z _ zv J
SEAL:
* * * * f * • * * * * * * * * * • * * • * A * • • * * * • * * * * * * • • * * * * * * * A * * * * * * * * * * A
1, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by
the stipulations and restrictions as speclfed heroin.
Date
* • * Y * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * A * * * * • • * * A * * • * • Y * * * t * • * * * Y * Y * * *
I' S have read this land owner's a
the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. grrement and do hereby agree to abide by
Permittee
Data
FORM: LAORS 02/95 Page 18 of 18
l
L

FARMER - LANDOWNER - FIELD SUMMARY
FARMER FIELD LANDOWNER
Gary Neal Allen MH 3-1 Gary Neal Allen
MH 3-jt Gary Neal Allen
TOTAL
SOIL TYPES
Field MH 3-1 Field MH 3-2
CeB2 CeB2
PeC2 PeC2
ACRES
GROSS NET
14.0
14.0
11.6
11.6
25.6
25.6
All fields found on Map 7 of Lincoln County Soil Survey.
:MHFRMSUM.ALL

'O F v
�,o NON,E�1 r op
,._M. S.GH,
• Z.4 P.� - vt - 'f'!p_ C 0 W �`�" p DAP
^p I x RNEY o e 'R u� F Boa, ` 9�..
W FO
B O40RORr¢
was z 4E71 h pyE .A- aLAD _ _ R . Vi5
JEFF'ERSoq S
DR acyi
A
CASTLEROCK. t� h
�c NC
C LN _ ME
e Z
•'3 4 p �• o
Kid le y NAGFRS r' OLD _
,RtSTOP. ER RD. ; 0
D. V DoaDoo
- S o -
_
RINGS
ET DR EAST'2(
LINCOLN
MIDDLE a (� S^f LcGX LN�
\ SCH. W L o�
■ a (o q'o \tij ereO' n0� ri sr . clue r c GI 3
.�T a U7EDy La
TIMBER O. TR..
t y
¢` _ rla u ' LK DD NODE
n K��
BALLARD RD.' B
.-- DENYER\�L -� K
— c+P - s 'k4Gz-
CVERs — o EAST o• i 2°� 4 y rao- Rnv
�T wwp.o
8 EN�N r C of
^� 16
J�GE�sc CATAW9A - c, . M R2L
SPRINGS .-
Ir 4r 9
BROOK DEN , � >- G ;
DR. OR DEER TR4Cf R TR D =4 L+WCrw
C-074Wo _
m RRY i
itCREEK FOR M �" i9GH ,a H C ^ D
O o 7' CT. E,Sr
I Machpelah C EAST LINCOLN� fin= p
d0 x'f
C✓✓ �RHIGH SCH q�
✓�OCN L ew i SOUTH �i° L/ '8'AN a� oDN 6�
>r L6 73 r �;_cRD �to_,�"
3 S-DESTIN
E5\O te• Crpl R �cr ; Ep a
C 7rs�y
rn ?LSOtN I O, 5� 7,0o4I f cI>TERRY
-_i - OA`E
- -I U I o 0y . �S)• z Z . CLua DR.
H`NGt ep
CLO SILV - (A T R ■ �,� pppi Q}y W
c `�
I L RJMFELr ODUA RY
GD Q�. c4�o s
G` V SIR j C� - ALL .
Lk
o- NZP Tpt n t Ht D 16 f0 <g E �VEr MEgDow
LAM85 3'eO aJ r. P r e-ILL g\f RD O y 4, yG µ 0. f., s T
�< z R RD BBC E � � �.. -E,: yys �. PpO'' � uN,
HUI ULll
LOEW. arI a'YB -t CE CT.
_ KCH4SE RD.. Ce C`UNTkppO GER eO - �p�N N[ �K. l714DR, 3
t ICh. 6 OSP _ aP�a q MIL L RD r�~ L SV I I le DAa ? PaRTE ,r.t o
1:17( 49 '' W GLEN wcINTOSM D. WOOD R
12
�DR Got'
o
O — U D — —_ — — — LO
NT y _ fAm I MBERBROOK TR
it
LOCATION MAP
—=1 FARM: �a�.teA L- �4 (�c,J
FIELDS:
ij

82
1383
cs
•872 ._\� l-/.- \gyp `- .--•— `Y`.,, l �j i - \ 4 \
to
IV /
Tucker Croye Tuc rove
CemiI _-,Camp ound:\ ._ •`� .,�_, �^
Mach l BrA• 1•�—� \ .�� \__l i '\� _ —% J4.
.�/
a Forney Q
Cem\
---�� .'L' �, '\•\�`. .I� /��i-\ •�•fri`�� •f� :'!/_\J//'� ter,
800
00
TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE 1.24,000
BLUE COLOR INDICATES WATER
Pond or lake ( p.
Il Stream or river
-! Intermittent stream amm amw s.rr
f-
! FARM: Atte j )A `{ FIELDS: / d-
I_

,� c.y:� - wry?;=, 4 y.(1S�i�.s L'� t ;.a+'••-
� Y -. �?�., .•► � L �.� 1 � th�����'-ree��E � y�e�4'�" a`•q ` .�.a-t' .5 '`\' ; '.� � .
`l
_ ', 'mil t .:,?„'! � -^ •_a` �� -
-wyt,- l-] '�'4�-ti `,L.' i tiT,.,>,t ` - �J f•S °���i'c�.-r'�+ V �:3^%�•-.. #�.. � _ 1 � .a.: _ cF.�`�,-- �°to _
_ :'F'tit'fy'�.._v`:1..i�"- _ �'�.:� � . .:. .,-L:,�R - �,-.••'e��`.-icai�'S •*rr H'e;�r.,.�.s'i.; �''i`..^ � i ' I•y,• 1. .� -`�-_• -.�_� �i �.: • - -=;�
F��_.._ ..��/`1. ,:p-.-�Y � C-l+ C�. _ ��. YtS-.:l:u, �•!`•y�'..:..:1Y~�•6y T.J \ f \ i � - �_Y � ♦ .•`•.
.1�1 >" Y: \sl:�.-'...�, �.:.` ,c`� ���i - �,t. ��x�• C4•.^ `'j�.i�� j+{`� , L f �' •ti.' .
j � w�T�•y ��T.���O.: Y^�'.•�y 1 7,. L.♦• •1 �NIl +`'T�(�',•Y l4. �L - ' 'sR -1, �'Y``^ . ... ` � i!� • .
\,- r '-�,. r-^�` �,' -• . .� �T.�e-�`�. �� T � =/ 1 ♦ -l_ ...-`� a_.,a .wag_: `'� ` \ ti=. a �•
I =\ �• `.`�.,.. �~�'titi mar: -�:"� �• �� .\R., Sy / 1„•�w�� ,@, t{ '�+. :a•.
"__,.� .�` _♦.?'� '-."'1.'"�-••f'`1�-.�-�-'i a�{;,Yi t;'•'\�.�t. �. ^.,o.�.y1�„3:�P� d �4 �•� �'��caL :�.� ���C^.�.`��:a -
-. �:��7a�'`� ',t`ti�:•.��� �-'S•'"� �yi: -\ -.-.•.`?Y;;,:_`<�s�`_'vt�^'y'•,^.''c"<- •. 1 •,x.:a�.•. ,.`it`-�•.-'i"i...,-.,�,,.LL ti._• `
t, <
�......•�c}
-�.s!, 1•:T-r"+ .ti �_`eY yy�.�.Y1• '�u• l-c Ii •Z t`•����-'S 1: i+ ~-� :,- - '` _ -!` _'•'•`.��
l � ��-��� �� yh �, '��- ,�. '�1 .T', i �:..'>-�Ti`•'"'-�,� "fir "'' p,•. .f'1i^'-'•�.-+a\_-�\i'�T,� :s �'�-_����:♦
- �c�,1"t -` - ����R"i�+� �-i� �.'� ^ '�• 1 F'v...l' _ `rP �� f \: �cy,�� !"+ _ �^., !��1�. � R _= •a`�t- -� y..-' '-T� _
-. =1-< ��.1 �"-�-��.�\`��,1..T_ '.4'• ��l� \• ��'.+�:.'S�"r� i�'�4.L..�..+'�s'r �k+. •~--i•� �.. is••,;`�_f
'0. �-•,2c `;,� y.,, � , f �; � a u . �,. _ �+' y, •+Zy. ".:y_,c ^ �'�'f 'i w c,��"r_ �^.._ :-!Fr"r•'
-•,1.,,'� ,,yy�� �r ���ggq►►���i11,,,JJ � � �". ii=-vi-�� t. '� ` �.:y _'F a_L 4 Z.,...
�y` __1 to 9 '•-4 ♦1� � - l'S .� � ,�`• . .�,-�.-�• ,.�.:il �j•-1 `�+==L '�::•' •:c'-h.�: � C
1T �' ' •'E ... C{ • 1 f 1 A . � w - .�1' �.`f.,� S-`:i ..v a[:, ` \_ ,i+v� �: ••�• ( ';, y` - ♦�'.`�! � �• ,�`_�
t k° . - • ti,{ - .,�. �•''�` } V-'ZLI - i �`��� �f.T,\Myn,,.�i- V-T'�_ 't .`�: �'•�:tie �:_Flr;:
' ,`b-^+:' �, `h �' <• •� � �:` 4�? 6`•.t�s+�. fir. F-�./`Y\?�i, '�-�-v .�a,'�':;ya+ v,.���.•...�= '_
�.�--�t-.•�r_ �i' _.'s �. ,. .__;-.'•�tf yt� yL•'-.' 1Ji.•j•� '.tiy'` 6-1 ,:,c''r`,-n. �,. '•<�"• i.. i.k"fi.'
.� �t� `� � w�U_ • 1ST r .t ac` � 4..a -�c'...., � � ^��y.-`'ti'�.a��., ,1"l
^mod. awl ~'•,..� - JL�-y `•�:'��'��-. ��ti° r.�: .�.cs'v.-.`y�''�`,. Kaa+.
�� T'.�:,.a?�"Y!w�:"l to � :�=a.1, :-��'�r�l ��a4�.'.��S..o.%.`'.� •.+:rr�'r•.`�C'•.a.�-••�—.�-
� �'S. �_,� lir-.y��.n• ` �, . �1._._t; `ram• ;S '� .•.1
.r r _ E � '�`�•".�(-.,:.•� '�' '�v ��tic:''c s�r•, �v.^ _ �•
+ D �•il.. i, i+ `ice • - t;, wT ��`�+ a,,. _ _ t' Or. }.. r~
I . a 'y : '•1 �.` �a.^;7}`.5� �:.ti. t• _.�': h ♦,"•'��c:'•�. ..����: :y, fs_'ti'4'P �'.y'�••� a, �y..°c
<�s. a i-i-�. • mil' *sL�- '
- =f ��.1° �..- 7--••cS� ' • �:• g� .} �. � :,t�a� • .� - � `y�� - ""ir_`�'" ;=�Z�1.,� l_� a't-�~' ;_•cis"'[ati-.'.-
��� � :t + � .i�'� ,,'��•�... ...o �;z.. y_; • �='.34su�:y�^Y;✓` • may"•`
•^.-' �0. '+a_'s'tl`- _ 1-T �>��. %�`e __ .. _.� _�•.�,r'^_-vim-vim ���r'i
7 .�" ��? - :r...-C'�y.�� T} e� �i la`�t-•�:� q R�x`ti,;_:f-•. •'''',t• y,!i�
- �'•}a.� •`.�'..i1-�•. ct.`� '�; c� '.:..y j'�'.--.a�T�' .�ee ���9,Ya'�-L' ��t,. `�'�'"=•` f••� �+.
�--��•ri� i -!� ` �t��� :'.7c �- A,C \�•,•^�•.a.�`s•-.r�n1y A . 1L .. :-1�.l-�.`�.�-�. ��� .:. K•l.•'... �,-- *`t•;r� c.i
i �v� �; .`l-,..•'�+r'11. t t �,- ��1'- _ +� �+:1 i �'_'S i,.1Yf •]� 't Y"ire
.J++��. .'.•r
� `� •.+t�y�'-tr.`.�'.L``-��'r _ .�\._.-t -i% � a y' C' '�' sl,','F��h,'�..:\i?�...�,-�y�--�;Y'�.6�r.i•..'�-
al
FK
AER-I_A-L PHOTOGRAPH _ FIELD FEATURES
�l H,,r,i I Boring F•i l E �' EErheE
(uran,e fy(llcl!v) (.%cllc�sl
_! � F3uffer 1rc•.E Field L'urLlc'1
i (red (yeIIo
- r ( [; i rCism Or pOfid)
'�— �) Ds CD

'` � �: r -- •^-�� -? CeB2 -`��. �'2 #i - {i _tom - •:i;y;
-e •T ia. PeC2 -.+ a �:_ c•o-� ��^ ,� � ,�` MA62- � v'- V v ` --
Rv •�,' � .0 �G ',. ; PaC .i 4i �^ i t .61tlC2 y\ . "'- �e�' p ti`5Y • .^
a..T tiQ0 ' �`_+F• �, r--� ,� Cee� �y'-m '� PeB2
P A. C�, -«•�� I a." ' Var\, , ���' �f �. Md ` -, -y _ • •v� ��io, c' .
zy% PeC2 'FaCV PeC2 uriZ r {
l� '.'�,r'�q • �- 3 - �_. a.- MdC2 ' 1' �. R•:C .:,;�,; - r: -a
PeB 0 ,
`' `�• CeB Z• _f+� �,i- .t wry.. P� �5 O c.e, v• ! .+,'�'aG _.r,�O l � •�^, 1
ti
_ -'".: � -. :.__:�' - .�.: - _ u, � " � `i• t eB2 '- .i M`efln. '�
_ - _ -� t 'PaD' .. vV• �+�• �'' - _ -•l. ?�.� O ~ ' • `tea - f
McC2
- cc'6� C cB- : . � A � •'�i, --,, 2 `� '-?Vl s B �X ` P aD ' .l- ��l �
c
�op_ _ '��. .atk -� '' _�� °.'ta O :.HeB` �� _�. .:I\ :rQ�•' - �<. h1�82 �,::r A^._�'` ,� ,! I
CeB2-
-C hA
Ch r A
.,,. �, •• cr-L �: J F19�1 / - 1 lli... •,ZWC*- 4
PeC2_ ~��p't �R PaC• .T c,' S` o1clo �' eG2. `l:,,i` �� '�{
�• :. r n PdD C __ F Yam_ _ eB2
'-< `�• CeB2•
•-r.- _'- CeB2 ^f .� _ :�;k. _ 'LPaD •" � 1` J\r
Z _ ::. C2 • J •_ `; ` CeB2. d� .
�� O ~.� S :�.•_S--.PeC2
a. ^'" _ •`a' PeC2 - - �_- .''�� _..v ChA '"'c- - _ Chq . Sf� a '•C' v.:..,+.
`�•' �� • • . +. ._ rim'' � .� .. � _ "i
J�0 PeC2
OAS— ra j r
i"Z7. �1 i _ ram_ '- _ _ • i _ 2 �� .Pe
CeB 2 d . u - ! � � -a, --'�. -L' ' �.�Z�� a '�.CJ :�.:a PeB 2- •u; . � f
/PeC2
4 ^ � Pe � T
SOIL MAP
SCALE 1:20.000
F A R.4l :+'�^/�� FI e_,J F I E L. 0 5: Wl }{ 3 ( 1 -

r-
L_
SOIL BORING
Greg Allen Neal Farm
Field MH 3-2
Soil type: Pacolet Sandy Clay Loam and Cecil Sandy Clay Loam
border area.
- Depth (inches)
Description
0 - 6
Reddish brown clay loam. Numerous roots, small
quartz particles, with some larger fragments up
i
to 2 inches in size.
6 - 12
At 8 inches becomes red clay, mica flakes and
quartz particles.
12 - 18
Soil slightly wet from recent rains. breaks
apart easily, almost friable, but is also
slightly sticky due to wet condition. Numerous
small mica flakes.
18 - 24
At 20 inches soil becomes more friable clay
loam. Small stone particles .5 - 1 inch in
size. Numerous small quartz particles and fine
mica flakes.
24 - 30
Yellow sand streaks at 26 inches, very friable,
_
reddish clay sandy loam. Numerous mica flakes
and small quartz fragments.
30 - 48
Clay loam, with some yellow streaks. friable,
mica flakes and some small black quartz
fragments.
No ground water or bedrock observed at 48 inches depth.
F

REPS NUMBER A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R244-01 1 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND BIO-NOMIC SERVICES INC
TO: O 00
516 ROUNDTREE RD �j�Ce
CHARLOTTE NC 28217
09/02/98 1
DATE OF REPORT PAGE
GARY N�AL ALLEN
19 GROWER: /'& �,`rl�'/_ /
jK
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
1
ACCT # 46058
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED BIO-NOMIC SERVICES INC
BY:
DATE RECEIVED 08/31/98
DATE OF ANALYSIS 09/01/98
ORGANIC MATTER
PHOSPHORUS
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
ACIDITY
C.E.C.
SAMPLE
NUMBER
LAB
NUMBER
% ENR
BRAY P1
BRAY P2
K
MG
CA
NA
SOIL
BUFFER
H
Ibs./A
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm
RATE
ppm
RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
pH
INDEX
meq/100g
meq/100
MH
3-1
19407
3.7 114H
23 M
31 M
131 H
132 VH
770 M
34
VL
5.8
6.8
1.3
6.
MH
3-2
19408
2.7 95M
21 M
38 M
149 VH
134 VH
730 M
47
VL
5.8
6.8
1.3
6.
PERCENT BASE SATURATION
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC
MANGANESE
IRON
COPPER
BORON
SOLUBLE
CHLORIDE
MOLYB-
SAMPLE
K
Mg
Ca
Na
H
NO3N
SOQS
ZN
MN
FIECU
B
SALTS
CL
DENUM M
ms/cm RATE
ppm RAI
NUMBER
%
%
%
%
%
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
ppm RATE
MH
3-1
5.0
16.4
57.4
2.2
19.0
32 V
5.9 H
51 VH
26 H
2.5 H
0.7
H
0.5 L
MH
3-2
5.8
16.9
55.2
3.1
19.0
44 V1
5.5 H
40 H
15 H
2.3 H
0.5
L
0.5 L
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the soil.
Explanation of symbols: Values are expressed as % (percent), ppm (parts per million), or Ibs/A (pounds per acre)
Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), H (High). VH (Very High).
ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity.
To convert to Ibs/A, multirly the rnsults in rnm by 2
This r rt applies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained
ma ' m o irty days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
STERN AGRICULTURAL LAB TORIES, INC.
b

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
l__I
SOIL - LEGEND
ill soils
L�„�col C'o,,r� I.C.
m ap
{ So i I name
i
1 I
symbol
I
-
A aA
!Altavista sandy loam, 0 to ,_ percent = i oF`'_s rarely f i ; _ de i
Aj B
i Aiip I I ng sandy loam, 1 to = percent slopes
I I
r•
L"i i I l:�
r
� i-� f (I'I L i i m b _ sand, (_i to 5 percent slopes, rarely Fio i i d •r i
---
Ccii
l''___I i sandy iii:am, 2 to = ier'i_eiIt slope:-
_
r:�_'1=•�_
i
i�_�_'C l i 3fIUy i_' l y`f loam, 2 to percent Cnt _ I ope_ eroded
CII A
! C hewac la loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, f r equ_ M 'y% T i _ii_iii; 'J
._
-aD
!Gaston loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
GIii_2
!Gaston sandy clay loam, 2 to = percent S I op;_ _. , er"ode'c1
G i i C 2
!Gaston sandy clay loam, = to 15 percent slopes, eroded
'•Jir s
&=iIr gev I I l e loam, .- to _ percent slopes
GrC
lGeorgeville loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
-
Gr"D
iGeorgevi i le loam, 15 to 25 percent •_.lii1-es
I
6`•r1--:2
l Genr-gev i i i e clay loam, ,_ to - percent = i opes _ eroded
tjVC.-
l Geor gev i l l e clay loam, _ o 15 percent slopes, `=r _ d :d
--
HeB
Ke',ena _and`y, loam, 1 to 6 percent_lope
MaD
;Madison sandy loam, 15to ,-_i percent slopes
--
M6132
d
!Madison sandy clay loam, 2 to = percent _ l op _ _ , eroded
MdCZ
!Madison sandy clay loam, _ to 15 ,;_,•cent o i over, er odod
i
OISE
!Masada sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Ms,_
!Masada 3ndy loam, _ to 15 percent slopes
aB
1Pacol2t sandy loam, 2 to = percent _ i pe
P..a,_
i F'ai_,, i e , _alley loam, _ to 13 percent slope--.:.
PaD
i r aco l e''•! sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
I'ar._
Yaco i et sandy loam, ,__ to 45 percent s l o es_
_
PeB2
! Paco l e G sandy clay loam, 2 _o = percent slopes, eroded
C2
jPacolet sandy clay loam, t. _ !� 15 percent - . - - -J _ i 'r iida-.J
r"'MU
ii ac!i.!'t-!'Iadison-Urban Lai!'_{ complex, 2� t _ percent slopes
I'(,I_
ii-'.:colet-011dltoon-llrban Land complex, ._ to i_ percent .!lopes
Pt
;Pits, quarries
-
F"II
-
!Rion sandy loam, 2 to_ percent slopes
ii^
!Rion sandy loam, _ to 15 percent slopes
r
f.•Y'H
!Riverview loam, 0 to ,- percent _. l i�pes, occasional l y i t oi�de'ci
eB
i Sedget I e I d fine sandy.. loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes
L-
Ud
i Ui_ior tllent `=•, loamy
Ur"
!Urban ban Land
W
i Water
marl
!Winnsboro fine sandy loam, 2 to = percent. _ . _apes
hloA
!Worsham f i ale sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
ZmE
;Zion-Mock:svi I ie complex, 25 to i_i percent slopes
L': c
!Zion-W i nnsbor!i-Mi!L"1:: V i l le complex, = to it percent s l opet.
-
ZwD
l Z i on-Winnsboro-Mock:sv i l i e complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes

I '
i
(J
1 �ICULTURE
{ICE
SOIL LEGEND
GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Soil map publication symbols and approved map unit names are listed alpha-
betically. The first letter of the symbol, a capital, is the initial letter of the soil
CULTURAL FEATURES
or miscellaneous area name. The second letter is a capital if the mapping
y
unit is an order three unit; otherwise, it is a small letter. The third letter, if
BOUNC+RIES
used, is a capital and indicates Me slope. The fourth symbol, if used, is a
number and indicates the erosion class. Order three map units, in addition
to having all capital letter symbols, are also footnoted.
Natrra'. sate or province
— —
_
Co.'7. o, parish
_
SYMBOL NAME
Mm p 1 division
AmB Alamance Variant gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Resee aeon (national lorest or park,
AmO Al in Variant ravel) loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes gravelly pe P
star forest or Dark,
APB Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
a-c arge airport)
I -
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam. 6 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
Lan- 1-ant
CIB Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
L_
CID Cecil -Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Lrm.7 a soil survey (label)
CH Chewacla loam, frequently flooded 1/
t
Co Congaree loam, occasionally flooded
Fiel- sheet matchline and neatline
I
GaB2 Gaston sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
j
GaD2 Gaston sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
AD HO:. BOUNDARY (label)
�—
GaE Gaston loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Smal airport, airfield, park, oillield,
HeB Helena sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
ce-etery, or flood pool
HuB Helena -Urban land complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes
STATE COORDINATE TICK
LSB Lignum silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
"
LAND O V!SION CORNER
MaB2 Madison sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded
tse: or•.s and land grants)
-
MaD2 Madison sandy clay loam, B to 15 percent slopes, eroded
I
MaE Madison sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
ROADS
Pa D2 Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
Divrzie- (median shown
PaE Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
i'scaie permits)
PaF Pacolet sandy loam. 25 to 45 percent slopes
—
Pt Pita
Otne- reads
Ro Rock outcrop
Trail
— — — — —
TaB Tatum gravelly loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
TaD Tatum gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
ROAD EMBLEM d DESIGNATIONS
TaE Tatum gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
,..�
Inte-smte
I
Ud Udorthents, loamy
Ur Urban land
Feoe•a!
UwF Uwharrie stony loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes, very bouldery
Va8 Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
San
VaD Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
�
Coun:y. term or ranch
C
WeD Wedowee sandy loam. 6 to 15 percent slopes
WkD Wilkes loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
RAILROAD
—its
—
WkF Wilkes loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes
Winnsboro loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
iWnB
WnD Winnsboro loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
POWER TRANSMISSION LINE
""""""•"
"
WoA Worsham loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
(normally not shown)
1/ Order three map unit. Fewer soil examinations were made in this unit, and
PIPE LINE
r---r .-- — —
-
delineations and included areas are generally larger. The unit was designed
(normalcy not shown)
primarily for woodland management.
FENCE
—•—•—
(normally not shown)
LEVEES
Without road
uunnrnnn
_.
With road
iiii irnun car
cancan nnnr
W,m rairoad
DAMS
Large (to scale)
Medium or Small
WO/fr
PITS
//'�
bl
i
Gravel pit
�(
Mine or quarry
'y(

rP �+ P. 3c 1. 3
Cecil Series
The Cecil series consists of well drained, moderately
permeable soils on uplands. They formed in residuum
weathered from felsic igneous and metamorphic rock,
such as granite. Slope ranges from 2 to 15 percent.
These soils are clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic
Kanhapludults.
- Cecil soils are commonly adjacent to Appling,
Gaston, Madison, and Pacolet soils. Appling soils are
more yellow, Gaston soils are darker red in the upper
_ part of the Bt horizon, and Madison soils have a high
content of mica. Pacolet soils are on side slopes and
have a thinner subsoil.
Typical pedon of Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, eroded; 3 miles northwest of Cherryville
on North Carolina Highway 274, 1.5 miles west on State
Road 1650, 50 feet northwest of intersection with State
Road 1647:
'I
Ap-0 to 6 inches; yellowish red (5YR 4/6) sandy clay
loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable;
common fine and medium roots; medium acid;
i I abrupt smooth boundary.
Bt1-6 to 26 inches: red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; moderate
j medium subangular blocky structure; firm, sticky
I and plastic; common fine roots; common fine pores;
common distinct clay films on faces of peds; few
fine flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary.
Bt2-26 to 45 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay; moderate
medium subangular blocky structure; firm, sticky
and plastic; few fine roots; few fine pores; common
i faint clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of
mica; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
j BC-45 to 58 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loam; few
medium distinct brownish yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles;
weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
common fine flakes of mica; few pockets of
saprolite; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C-58 to 80 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) saprolite that has a
loam texture; common medium distinct brownish
yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles and few fine faint dark
red mottles; massive; friable; common fine flakes of
mica; strongly acid.

64
Cecil soils have a loamy A horizon and a
predominantly clayey Bt horizon that extend to a depth
of 30 to 58 inches. The solum is 35 to 60 inches thick.
Depth to bedrock is more than 6.5 feet. The A horizon
is medium acid to very strongly acid unless lime has
been added. The Bt and BC horizons are very strongly
acid or strongly acid. Content of mica flakes ranges
from few to common in most pedons.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 2.5YR to 7.5YR,
value of 4 or 5. and chroma of 3 to 8.
The Bt horizon has hue of 1 OR or 2.5YR, value of 4
or 5, and chroma of 6 to 8. Hue can range to 5YR in
some pedons where the soil is not mottled. The Bt
horizon is clay or clay loam. The BC horizon has hue of
2.5YR to 5YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 4 to B. It
is clay loam or sandy clay loam.
The C horizon is reddish or multicolored saprolite
weathered from felsic igneous and metamorphic rock.
The texture is variable but typically is loamy.
Chewacla Series
The Chewacla series consists of frequently flooded,
somewhat poorly drained, moderately permeable soils
on flood plains. They formed in recent alluvium. Slope
is less than 2 percent. These soils are fine -loamy,
mixed, thermic Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts.
Chewacla soils are commonly adjacent to Congaree
soils. Congaree soils are well drained to moderately
well drained and are in a slightly higher position,
generally near the stream channel.
Typical pedon of Chewacla loam, frequently flooded:
4.5 miles south of Gastonia on U.S. Highway 321 on
State Road 1136. 0.8 mile northwest of intersection with
U.S. Highway 321, 200 feet west of road:
A-0 to 6 inches: brown (10YR 4/3) loam; weak fine
granular structure; friable; many fine and medium
roots; common fine flakes of mica; medium acid;
clear wavy boundary.
Bw1-6 to 13 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) fine
sandy loam: common medium distinct strong brown
(7.5YR 4;6) mottles; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky and slightly
plastic; common fine and medium roots; common
fine flakes of mica; medium acid; abrupt smooth
boundary.
Bw2-13 to 20 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4)
loam; many medium distinct gray (10YR 6/1)
mottles and few fine distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR
6/6) mottles; weak fine subangular blocky structure;
Soil Survey
friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; few fine
and medium roots; common fine and medium flakes
of mica; few fine distinct red (2.5Y 4/6) mottles in
old root channels; medium acid; abrupt smooth
boundary.
Bw3-20 to 32 inches; brown (10YR 5/3) clay loam;
many medium distinct dark gray (10YR 4/1) mottles
and few fine distinct strong brown (7.5YR 4/6)
mottles; weak fine subangular blocky structure;
friable, slightly sticky -and slightly plastic; few
medium roots; common fine and medium flakes of
mica; few fine distinct red (2.5Y 4/6) mottles in old
root channels; medium acid; gradual wavy
boundary.
Bg-32 to 45 inches; grayish brown (2.5Y 5/2) sandy
clay loam; common fine and medium distinct strong
brown (7.5YR 4/6) mottles; weak fine subangular
blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky and slightly
plastic; few fine roots; common fine flakes of mica;
few fine distinct red (2.5Y 4/6) mottles in old root
channels; medium acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Cg1-45 to 50 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) sandy clay
loam; common fine and medium prominent strong
brown (7.5YR 4/6) mottles and common medium
faint light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) mottles;
massive; friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic;
few fine roots; few fine flakes of mica; medium acid:
gradual wavy boundary.
Cg2-50 to 60 inches; light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2)
sandy clay loam; many fine and medium distinct
brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) mottles; massive;
friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; few fine
flakes of mica; few quartz gravel; medium acid.
Chewacla soils have loamy A and B horizons that
extend to a depth of more than 35 inches. Depth to
bedrock is more than 5 feet. Throughout the soil are
few to common flakes of mica. Chewacla soils range
from very strongly acid to slightly acid unless lime has
been added.
The Ap or A horizon has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value
of 3 to 5, and chroma of 1 to 4. This horizon is less
than 7 inches thick where value is 3.
The Bw horizon has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of z
to 7, and chroma of 3 to 8. Mottles of chroma of 2 or
less are within 24 inches of the surface. The Bg horizon
has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma
of 1 or 2. The Bw and Bg horizons are loam, clay loam
sandy clay loam, fine sandy loam, or sandy loam.
The Cg horizon is similar in color to the Bg horizon
and is alluvium of variable texture.

Gaston County. North Carolina
65
Congaree Series
The Congaree series consists of occasionally
flooded, well drained or moderately well drained,
moderately permeable soils on flood plains. They
formed in recent alluvium. Slope ranges from 0 to 4
percent. These soils are fine -loamy, mixed, nonacid
thermic Typic Udifluvents.
Congaree soils are adjacent to Chewacla soils.
Chewacla soils are somewhat poorly drained and are
on lower parts of the flood plains.
Typical pedon of Congaree loam, occasionally
flooded; 3.8 miles southeast of Gastonia on Linwood
Road (State Road 1131). on State Road 1 132 0.6 mile
southeast of intersection of State Road 1131 and State
Road 1132. 250 feet east of road:
Ap-0 to 8 inches: brown (7.5YR 4' '4) loam; weak fine
granular structure: friable; many fine and medium
roots: common fine flakes of mica; medium acid;
clear smooth boundary.
C-8 to 21 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 4/6) fine sandy
loam; massive; very friable; many fine roots;
common fine flakes of mica: slightly acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
Ab-21 to 25 inches: dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4)
loam: weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable;
few fine roots: common fine flakes of mica: slightly
acid: gradual wavy boundary.
Bb1-25 to 35 inches: strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) silty
clay loam: moderate medium subangular blocky
structure: firm, slightly sticky and slightly plastic: few
fine roots: few fine flakes of mica; slightly acid;
gradual smooth boundary.
Bb2-35 to 42 inches: brown (7.5YR 4/4) loam; many
fine distinct yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) mottles;
weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable,
slightly sticky and slightly plastic; few medium roots:
few fine flakes of mica: common fine black
manganese concretions: slightly acid; gradual wavy
boundary.
C'-42 to 54 inches: yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) silty
clay loam: common fine distinct light brownish gray
(10YR 6,'2) and reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/6) mottles:
massive: friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic:
common fine flakes of mica; few fine black
manganese concretions: medium acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
Cg-54 to 62 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2)
fine sandy loam; common fine distinct strong brown
(7.5YR 5'6) mottles: massive; very friable: common
fine flakes of mica; slightly acid.
Congaree soils have Icamy horizons that extend to a
depth of 40 inches or more. Depth to bedrock is more
than 10 feet. Throughout :he soil are few to common
flakes of mica. Congaree soils range from very strongly
acid to neutral unless lime has been added.
The Ap or A horizon has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value
of 3 to 5, and chroma of 2 to 6. Where the value is 3,
the horizon is less than 6 inches thick.
The C or C' horizon has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value
of 4 or 5. and chroma of 3 to 6. In some pedons,
mottles of chroma of 2 or :ess are below a depth of 24
inches. A Cg horizon is below a depth of 50 inches in
some pedons. It has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to
7, and chroma of 1 or 2. The C, C', and Cg horizons
are fine sandy loam, silty clay loam, or loam with thin
strata of sandier or more c!ayey material.
Most pedons have Ab and Bb horizons. The Ab
horizon is similar in color to the A horizon and is loam
or fine sandy loam. The Bb horizon is similar in color to
the C or C' horizon. It is loam or silty clay loam.
Gaston Series
The Gaston series consists of well drained,
moderately permeable soils on uplands. They formed in
residuum weathered from intermediate igneous and
metamorphic rock, such as diorite. Slope ranges from 2
to 25 percent. These soils are clayey, mixed, thermic
Humic Hapludults.
Gaston soils are commonly adjacent to Cecil,
Madison, and Winnsboro soils. Cecil and Madison soils
have kaolinitic mineralogy. In addition, Madison soils
have a thinner subsoil and high content of mica.
Winnsboro soils are less acid and are more yellow.
Typical pedon of Gaston sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, eroded: 5 miles south of Belmont on
North Carolina Highway 273. 0.9 mile south on State
Road 2525, 500 feet south on a field road and 250 feet
west of road:
Ap-0 to 6 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 3/4) sandy
clay loam; weak medium granular structure; friable;
many fine roots; slightly acid: clear smooth
boundary.
Bt i —6 to 14 inches; dark red (2.5YR 3/6) clay;
moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm,
sticky and plastic; common fine and few medium
roots; common distinct clay films on faces of peds;
few black streaks; medium acid; gradual wavy
boundary.
B12-14 to 47 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; few medium
distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/8) mottles;

*R•b ,
eaSC�`
66
moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm,
sticky and plastic; common fine roots; common
distinct clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes
of mica: few black streaks; medium acid: clear wavy
boundary.
BC-47 to 57 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loam;
common medium distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR 6.118)
mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable: slightly sticky and slightly plastic; common
fine flakes of mica; few pockets of weathered black
minerals; medium acid; clear wavy boundary.
C-57 to 72 inches: mottled red (2.5YR 4/6), yellowish
red (5YR 5/6), and yellowish brown (10YR 5/4)
saprolite that has a loam texture; massive; common
black specks and streaks; common fine flakes of
mica; medium acid.
Gaston soils have a loamy A horizon and a
predominantly clayey Bt horizon that extend to a depth
of 34 to 58 inches. The solum is 40 to 65 inches thick.
Depth to bedrock is more than 6 feet. Most pedons
have few to common flakes of mica in the Bt horizon
and few to many flakes of mica in the BC and C
horizons. Gaston soils are strongly acid to slightly acid
unless lime has been added.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 2.5YR to 7.5YR,
value of 3, and chroma of 3 to 6.
The Bt horizon has hue of 1 OR or 2.5YR, value of 3
or 4, and chroma of 4 to 8. Dark streaks or stains occur
in most pedons. The Bt horizon is clay or clay loam.
The BC horizon has hue of 2.5YR to 5YR, value of 4 to
6, and chroma of 6 to 8. It is clay loam, sandy clay
loam, or loam.
The C horizon is reddish or multicolored saprolite
weathered from intermediate igneous and metamorphic
rock. The texture is variable but typically is loamy.
44. W
Madison Series
The Madison series consists of well drained,
moderately permeable soils on uplands. They formed i
residuum weathered frc-i felsic micaceous metamorph
rock, such as mica sch-St and mica gneiss. Slope
ranges from 2 to 25 pe---ent. These soils are clayey,
kaolinitic. thermic Typic Kanhapludults.
Madison soils are cc-'mcnly adjacent to Cecil,
Gaston, and Pacolet so S. These. soils have less mica
than Madison soils. In =--diJon, Cecil and Gaston soils
have thicker subsoils.
Typical pedon of Mat -;son sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, eroded: 3.5 miles northeast of Dallas c
North Carolina Highway 275. 0.4 mile south on State
Road 2002, 50 feet we-st of road:
Ap-0 to 4 inches; yellowish red (5YR 4/6) sandy clay
loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable
common fine and medium roots; common fine

I
68
flakes of mica: strongly acid; clear smooth
boundary.
611-4 to 20 inches: red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; few fine
distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/8) mottles;
moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm,
sticky and plastic; common fine and medium roots;
common fine pores; common faint clay films on
faces of peds: common fine flakes of mica; strongly
acid: gradual wavy boundary.
Bt2-20 to 28 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; common
medium distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/8) mottles;
weak medium subangular blocky structure; firm,
sticky and plastic; few fine and medium roots;
common fine pores; common faint clay films on
faces of peds: many fine flakes of mica; few quartz
pebbles; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
BC-28 to 36 inches; yellowish red (5YR 5/6) clay
loam; common medium distinct reddish yellow
(7.5YR 6/8) mottles; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; friable; many fine flakes of mica
that feel greasy; common medium fragments of rock
and pockets of saprolite that crushes easily to loam;
strongly acid: gradual wavy boundary.
C-36 to 60 inches; mottled red (2.5YR 4/6), yellowish
red (5YR 5.'6). reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/8), reddish
brown (5YR 5A), and pale brown (10YR 6/3)
saprolite that has a loam texture; friable; many fine
mica flakes that feel greasy; very strongly acid.
Madison soils have a loamy A horizon and a
predominantly clayey Bt horizon that extend to a depth
of 20 to 30 inches. The solum is 20 to 40 inches thick.
Depth to bedrock is more than 5 feet. Content of mica
ranges from few to many flakes in the upper horizons to
many in the lower horizons. Madison soils are strongly
acid or very strongly acid unless lime has been added.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 5YR or 7.5YR, value
of 4 or 5, and chroma of 4 to 8.
The Bt horizon has hue of 1 OR to 5YR, value of 4 to
6, and chroma of 6 to 8. It is clay, sandy clay, or clay
loam. The BC horizon is similar in color to the Bt
horizon and is clay loam, sandy clay loam, or loam.
The C horizon is multicolored saprolite weathered
from felsic micaceous metamorphic rock. The texture is
variable but typically is loamy.
Pacolet Series
The Pacolet series consists of well drained,
moderately permeable soils on uplands. They formed in
residuum weathered from felsic igneous and
metamorphic rock, such as granite and gneiss. Slope
Soil Survey
ranges from 8 to 45 percent. These soils are clayey,
kaolinitic, thermic Typic Ka:: apludults.
Pacolet soils are commo- ly adjacent to Cecil,
Madison, and Wedowee soils. Cecil soils have thicker
subsoils. Madison soils have a high content of mica.
Wedowee soils have a mo.-e yellow Bt horizon.
Typical pedon of Pacole: sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes; 2 miles no -:",east of Dallas, 800 feet
northeast of intersection of state Road 1804 and State
Road 1800:
A-0 to 5 inches; brown (.5YR 4/2) sandy loam;
moderate medium gra-::lar structure; friable; many
fine and medium roots: strongly acid; clear wavy
boundary.
BA-5 to 8 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay loam; weak fine
subangular blocky structure; friable; common fine
and medium roots; few fine flakes of mica; very
strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
Bt-8 to 27 inches; red (2.5YR 4!6) clay; few medium
distinct reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/6) mottles;
moderate medium subangular blocky structure; firm,
sticky and plastic; common faint clay films on faces
of peds; common fine flakes of mica; very strongly
acid; gradual wavy boundary.
BC-27 to 39 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loam;
common medium distinct dark red (2.5YR 3/6),
reddish yellow (7.5YR 7!6), and brownish yellow
(10YR 6/8) mottles; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; friable; common fine flakes of
mica; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C-39 to 60 inches; mottled red (2.5YR 4/6), dark red
(2.5YR 3/6), yellowish red (5YR 4/6), and brownish
yellow (10YR 6/8) saprolite that has a loam texture;
massive; friable; common fine flakes of mica; very
strongly acid.
Pacolet soils have a loamy A horizon and a
predominantly clayey Bt horizon that extend to a depth
of 20 to 30 inches. The solum is 30 to 50 inches thick.
The depth to bedrock is more than 5 feet. Content of
mica flakes ranges from few to common in most
pedons. The Pacolet soils are medium acid to very
strongly acid unless lime has been added.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value
of 4 or 5, and chroma of 2 to B. Some pedons have an
E horizon that has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value of 4 to 6,
and chroma of 3 to B.
The Bt horizon has hue of 1 OR or 2.5YR, value of 4
or 5, and chroma of 6 to 8. It is clay loam, sandy clay,
or clay. The BC horizon is mottled in shades of red,
yellow, or brown. It is clay loam, sandy clay loam, or

�i
72
FAG. % P►S'- 0
Udorthents
Udorthents consist of areas where the natural soil
has been altered by excavation or covered by earthy fill
material. These areas are well drained or moderately
well drained. The excavated areas mainly are borrow
pits from which the soil has been removed and used as
foundation material for roads or buildings. In most
excavated areas. the exposed substratum is loam,
sandy loam, or sandy clay loam. The fill areas are sites
where at least 20 inches of loamy earthy fill material
covers borrow pits, landfills. natural drainageways, or
low-lying areas. Slopes range from nearly level to
steep, and some areas are undulating.
A typical pedon is not given for these soils because
of their variability. Most areas are deep or very deep to
bedrock, but some areas, particularly borrow areas, are
moderately deep or shallow to bedrock. The fill areas
are more than 20 inches deep and as thick as 30 feet in
places. Landfills have layers of material other than soil
covered by loamy soil material.
Udorthents have colors in shades of red, browns,
yellows, and grays. The texture is variable but typically
is loamy. The material ranges from extremely acid to
slightly acid.
Mikes Series
The Wilkes series consists of well drained,
moderately slowly permeable soils on uplands. They
formed in residuum weathered from intermediate and
mafic igneous and metamorphic rock, such as diorite
and gabbro. Slope ranges from 6 to 30 percent. These
soils are loamy, mixed, thermic, shallow Typic
Hapludalfs.
Wilkes soils are commonly adjacent to Winnsboro
and Gaston soils. These soils are deeper to bedrock.
Winnsboro soils have a thicker subsoil, and Gaston
soils have hue redder than 5YR and a more permeable
subsoil.
Typical pedon of Wilkes loam, 15 to 30 percent
Soil Survey
slopes; 2 miles southeast of Stanley on State Road
1918, 5.2 miles southeast on State Road 1923, 250 fee
northeast of road in wooed area:
Oi-2 to 1 inches; undecomposed, mixed hardwood an(
pine forest litter.
Oe-1 to 0 inches; partly decomposed forest litter.
A-0 to 6 inches; dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4)
loam; weak fine gra,.ilar structure; very friable;
common fine and rr.��ium roots; common fine
manganese concretions: medium acid; abrupt wavy
boundary.
Bt-6 to 11 inches; stro^g brown (7.5YR 5/6) clay;
strong medium anou:ar blocky structure; firm, sticky
and plastic; common fine and few medium roots;
common faint clay fiims on faces of peds and sides
of root channels; common streaks and bodies of
black, green, and yellowish brown partly weathered
primary minerals; oi;; root channels have material
from the A horizon; slightly acid; clear wavy
boundary.
B/C-11 to 15 inches: sarong brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy
clay loam; weak me::ium subangular blocky
structure; firm, slightly sticky and slightly plastic;
common medium prominent black, yellowish brown
and green pockets of saprolite and weattterOd
primary minerals with a sandy loam texture; few fin
roots; slightly acid; clear wavy boundary.
Cr-15 to 60 inches; multicolored weathered diorite
bedrock; partly consolidated but can be dug with
difficulty with a spade; few pockets of clay loam
filling seams; common hard diorite fragments.
Wilkes soils have Icamy and clayey horizons 10 to 2
inches thick underlain by a Cr horizon of weathered
bedrock. Depth to hard bedrock is more than 40 inches
Manganese concretions range from few to common in
most pedons. The soil is strongly acid to slightly acid it
the upper horizons and slightly acid to mildly alkaline it
the lower horizons.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, valu(
of 3 to 5, and chroma of 2 to 4. Some pedons have an
E horizon that has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 or E
and chroma of 2 to 4.
The B horizon has hue of 5YR to 2.5Y, value of 4 to
6, and chroma of 4 to 8. Mottles, bodies, or streaks of
black, greenish, grayish, or white saprolite or primary
minerals are few to common in most pedons. The B
horizon is clay, clay loam, sandy clay loam, or loam.
The B/C horizon has a matrix similar in color and
texture to the B horizon. Pockets of less weathered
material similar in color and texture to the C horizon-

C-
FPw"r� ®F
i,1993
"71101 OF filYlltDldrf
NOORESViLIE RE;jgjg Umv
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT AMENDMENT
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CITY OF MT. HOLLY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
City of Mt. Holly
131 South Main Street
Mt. Holly, North Carolina 28120
Prepared By:
S&ME, Inc.
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410

March 17, 1993
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Attention: Ms. Carolyn McCaskill
Reference: Modification of Permit No. W00001863
City of Mt. Holly Residual Solids Management Program
S&ME Project No. 1584-92-005
Dear Ms. McCaskill:
S&ME, Inc. is under contract with the City of Mt. Holly to manage their residual solids management
program. S&ME wishes to modify the existing permit by adding approximately 250.0 acres (204.8 net acres)
as receiver sites for the land application of residual solids.
Operating procedures will involve the land application of the Mt. Holly Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
residual solids and the Mt. Holly Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) residual solids seperately onto the
same permitted fields. Approximately 1,500,000 gallons of WTP residual solids is proposed to be land
applied within the remainder of the current permit on an as -needed application basis. This as- needed basis
will be done within agronomic rates in accordance with Permit No. W00001863 and monitored closely by
S&ME and the City of Mt. Holly. Annual volume at the WWTP is requested to be increased to approximately
3,000,000 gallons annually.
Your prompt attention in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Please contact us immediately
if you require additional information in the review of the permit modification.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Robert P. Willcox, Jr.
Soil Scientist
Enclosure: Permit Package, $400.00 submittal fee
taj S&ME, Inc. 3718 Old Battleground Rood, Greensboro, North Carolina 27410, [phone], Fax [phone]
V :,,, Mailing address: P.O. Box 38728, Greensboro, North Carolina 27438
Prin o
Recycled Paper

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section No. Title
Page No. `
I MANAGEMENT PLAN
1
SPILL CONTROL PLAN
3
APPLICATION RATES
4
RESIDUAL SOLIDS CHARACTERISTICS
6
MONITORING
7
RECORDS
8
II LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
9
APPLICATION FORM
WATER TREATMENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT SOLIDS COMBINED
III LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
10
APPLICATION FORM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
IV LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
11
APPLICATION FORM
WATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
PROPOSED MODIFICATION SITES
V GARY DUCKWORTH FARM
Location Map
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Topographic Mapping
ASCS Mapping
SCS Mapping
Buffer Map
Field Data Sheet
Soil Analysis Report
VI TONY JONES FARM
Location Map
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Topographic Mapping
ASCS Mapping
SCS Mapping
Buffer Map
Field Data Sheet
Soil Analysis Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Section No. Title
VII CHARLES RHYNE FARM
Location Map
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Topographic Mapping
ASCS Mapping
SCS Mapping
Buffer Map
Field Data Sheet
Soil Analysis Report
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I: RESIDUAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS REPORTS
Wastewater Treatment Plant Residual Solids
Water Treatment Plant Residual Solids
APPENDIX II: SOIL SERIES DESCRIPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS RECORDS

MANAGEMENT PLAN
The residual solids management program proposes that residual solids from the Mount Holly
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and Water Treatment Plant (WTP) be applied to the proposed fields
as an agricultural resource at agronomic rates. The residual solids will be applied to hay or -pasture land `
at agronomic rates for total or partial replacement of conventional N and P fertilizers. The actual amount
of residual solids applied will be dependent upon the nutrient requirement of the specific crop and the
nutrient content of the residual solids.
Residual solids application scheduling will be dependent upon residual solids production, storage at
the respective treatment plants, and the crop management program. On farms utilized for hay and pasture
production, residual solids will be applied in split applications as is normally done when conventional
fertilizers are applied to hay fields. These applications will correspond prior to grass growth in the spring,
after each cutting in the growing season, or whenever most appropriate.
The fields will receive residual solids in an agronomic manner based on requirements listed in Permit
Number WO0001863. Residual solids will be applied at agronomic rates which are limited by nitrogen
loading rates. In this manner, ground water monitoring should not be required. Soil pH will be adjusted
immediately prior to or during residual solids application to 6.5.
Prior to an application event, an application rate will be determined based on current nutrient analysis.
Representative residual solids samples will be collected during the haul period and composited for analysis.
This composite sample will then be delivered to a qualified laboratory familiar with residual solids analysis
and analyzed for ammonia nitrogen, nitrate/nitrite nitrogen, % total solids, total Kjeldahl nitrogen,
phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, copper, zinc, cadmium, chromium, nickel, lead,
aluminum, chlorides, sulfate, pH, and calcium carbonate equivalency. Plant available nitrogen (PAN) will
then be calculated from this residual solids analysis. This information will be used to calculate the loading
rate for the field and crop.
Once the appropriate application rate has been calculated, the residual solids will be removed from
the respective treatment plant and transported to the site in trucks or tankers adapted for dewatered or liquid
residual solids. For liquid residual solids, the residual solids will be loaded into 6,500 to 8,500 gallon tankers
converted to haul liquid residual solids.

The tankers will then travel major traffic routes to the fields whenever possible. Once at the field, the
tanker will proceed to a designated staging area. The residual solids will then be transferred to a liquid
residual solids applicator designed and operated to obtain an even application consistent with agricultural
requirements. S&ME contracts the residual solids removal, hauling, and land application to Advanced Waste
Management Services, Inc. which employs an AG Chem Terragator 2505 to land apply the residual solids.
All residual solids will be removed from the staging area by the end of the working day, unless
equipment breakdown or weather prohibits the residual solids application. At the start of each day, all fields
will be inspected by the field superintendent. Equipment will only enter a field when conditions are
appropriate for the application. Residual solids will only be applied when the field is capable of supporting
equipment without extensive rutting. When field conditions are not appropriate for an application, such as
during wet periods, the residual solids will remain at the WWTP until field conditions are suitable for land
application.
Prior to the residual solids operations, the field superintendent and Mt. Holly WWTP personnel will
inspect the site. During the field inspection, the field superintendent will note the standard DEM buffer zones
including: homes, drainage ditches, roads, wells, surface water, and property boundaries (listed in Table
1 below). On the basis of these standard DEM buffers for land treatment programs, buffers will be
established in the field. These buffers will be identified in the field by the placement of pin flags.
TABLE 1
DEM Buffers for Current Permit WO0001863
Application Method
Injection or
Surface
Area Description
Incorporation
Spreading
-------------------------- feet ------------------------------------------
Property boundary
100
100
Public private road
25
50
Development (residential)
200
400
Inhabited dwelling
200
400
Potable wells
private
100
100
public
100
100
Draingeways
50
100
Surface Water
50
100
2

SPILL CONTROL PLAN
MT. HOLLY, NORTH CAROLINA
In the case of a spill, the following action shall be taken immediately:
Halt the source of the spill: Ruptured line or valve, or damaged tank unit.
2. Contain spill: Use straw bales to form a barrier. Straw hay bales can be obtained from several
sources for this purpose. Soil near the site can also be used to form a barrier for containment.
3. Clean up: Use residual solids application equipment to recover as much of the material as
possible. After the application equipment has recovered as much material as possible, it will be
land applied as per operation plan. A temporary sump pit may be dug in the containment area
and spilled material washed into it to enhance recovery.
4. Final Clean up: Any unrecoverable material will be washed from the road surface and
incorporated into an adjacent tillable area.
5. Notification: As soon as possible after a spill occurs notify:
A. Wastewater Treatment Plant operator at (919) 827 - 4261
B. Department of Environment Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office at (919) 633 - 1699
C. Gaston County Sheriff's Department
D. Fire -Department If assistance is required for washdown
F. S&ME, Inc. (919) 288 - 7180
6. Management of clean up efforts: The field superintendent shall take immediate charge of the
clean up activities. Additional labor will be requested from the treatment plant as needed.
7. Reporting: Within 24 hours of a spill of the field superintendent shall present a written report
detailing the cause of the spill and all action taken in response to the spill.
3

APPLICATION RATES
The residual solids application rate will be based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement
for the crop and the PAN content in the residual solids. The PAN requirement for the specific crop will be _
derived from limits in current Permit No. WO0001863 (Table 2). Crops typically grown in the Gaston and
Lincoln County area are hay, fescue, small grains, and soybeans.
TABLE 2
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Limits for Crops
Commonly grown in Gaston and Lincoln County based on Permit No. WO0001863
Crop Pan Recommendations
Ibs/ac.
Fescue 250
Soybeans 150
Small grain 100
The PAN recommendation for fescue hay is 250 pounds per acre. Soybeans are able to fix NZ as
NH3 in a symbiotic relationship with a nitrogen fixing bacteria. However, soybeans will utilize nitrogen if it
is applied in a plant available form. Based on the existing permit the application rate for soybeans shall not
exceed 150 pounds of PAN per acre.
The PAN content of the residual solids will be based on, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonium -
nitrogen (NH4-N), nitrate -nitrogen (NO3 N), nitrite nitrogen (NOz N) content, and the mineralization of organic
N into inorganic N. Most of the nitrogen in the residual solids is in an organic form. As the residual solids
are incorporated into the soil, the soil microorganisms utilize the residual solids as an energy and nutrient
source. In the process, a portion of the organic N is mineralized or biologically converted into inorganic
N.
Various environmental factors such as temperature, moisture, and carbon to nitrogen ratio will affect
the mineralization rate. Typical mineralization factors range from 0.2 to 0.4. A mineralization rate of 0.30
has been selected for this land treatment program due to the lime stabilization process.

The PAN application rate will be calculated based on the mineralization rate: TKN, NH,-N, NO,-N,
NOz N content; and method of application. Residual solids which are injected into the soil typically retain
a large portion of the NH3 gas which is found in the residual solids or is converted from the_NH; N form.
However, when the residual solids are surface applied to hay or fallow row crop fields, a large portion of the
NH3N is volatilized and lost as a nutrient for crop uptake. The actual plant available nitrogen content for
equal residual solids is less when the residual solids are surface applied compared to when the residual
solids are injected into the soil and the NH3N gas is trapped by the soil. To reflect the lower PAN content
for surface applied residual solids due to the volatilization of NH3N gas, the portion of NH4N in the residual
solids contributing to the PAN is reduced by 50%.
The PAN content of the residual solids is then calculated for injected and surface applications as
follows:
A. PAN injected = 0.30 (TKN - NH4N) + NH4 N + NO3-N + NO2 N
B. PAN surface applied = 0.30 (TKN - NH4 N) + 0.5 (NH4 N) + NO3-N + NO2 N
where:
0.30 =
mineralization factor (lime stabilized residual solids)
TKN =
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NH,-N =
Ammonia nitrogen
NO3-N =
Nitrate nitrogen
NO2 N =
Nitrite nitrogen
0.5 =
Volatilization factor
PAN Applied = (gal/ac)(8.34 Ib/gal)(% Solids)(% PAN)
5

RESIDUAL SOLIDS CHARACTERISTICS
The City of Mt. Holly Wastewater Treatment Facility currently generates about 3,000,000 gallons per
year of residual solids and has approximately 500,000 gallons of residual solids storage capacity at -the
treatment plant. The City of Mt. Holly Water Treatment Facility will produce approximately 1,500,000 gallons
of alum residual solids between March 1993 and April 1995 when the permit expires. Characteristics of the
residual solids are shown on the attached application form (Section II), and are also given in Appendix I.
Results of the TCLP for both the WWTP and the WTP(Alum) analysis are given in Appendix I. The residual
solids characteristics are typical of other residual solids generated by WWTP's and WTP's in North Carolina.
Likewise, the TCLP results are well below the maximum limits for a waste to be characterized as non-
hazardous.
N.

MONITORING
The residual solids and soil will be sampled at specific intervals to insure the beneficial utilization for
agricultural production. Residual solids samples will be obtained for each land application event. The
residual solids samples will be collected and delivered to a laboratory qualified to analyze residual solids and
is familiar with routine environmental sample preparation and standards.
A residual solids analysis will be conducted for, but not limited to, the following parameters, % total
solids, chlorides, phosphorus, lead, copper, cadmium, sodium, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite
nitrogen, aluminum, magnesium, sulfate, potassium, zinc, nickel, chromium, calcium, ammonia nitrogen, pH,
and calcium carbonate equivalency. Annual TCLP analysis for regulatory compliance will also be conducted.
Once each year, the fields will be sampled for routine soil fertility and lime requirements. Although
the soil samples will likely be collected in the fall or winter seasons, the soil samples may also be collected
between croppings. Once the soil samples are collected, the soil samples will be delivered to either the
North Carolina Department of Agriculture - Agronomic Division or A & L Eastern Agricultural Laboratories,
Inc. for routine soil analysis.
7

RECORDS
Records pertinent to the successful management of the land applications program will be maintained
for the benefit of the landowner, DEM, the City of Mt. Holly, and the Permitee. Each year an annual
summary of the activities of the program will be prepared and delivered to the appropriate agencies and
participants on or before the 1st of March. The annual summary will inlcude:
A) Source of residual solids
B) Date of residual solids application
C) Location of residual solids application (field number)
D) Method of application
E) Weather conditions
F) Soil conditions
G) Type of crop or crop to be grown on field
H) Volume of residual solids applied in gallons/acre and dry tons/acre
1) Annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of residual solids, annual and cumulative
pounds/acre of each heavy metal (which shall include, but not be limited to lead, nickel,
cadmium, copper, and zinc), annual pounds/acre of plant available nitrogen (PAN), and
annual pounds/acre of phosphorus applied to each field
2. A representative annual soil analysis which will include the following parameters: standard soil
fertility test, % base saturation, phosphorus, potassium, lead', zinc', magnesium, pH,
manganese, cation exchange capacity, sodium, nickel', cadmium', copper', and calcium.
3. A quarterly residual solids analysis which will include the following parameters: % total solids,
chlorides, phosphorus, lead, copper, cadmium, sodium, total nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite
nitrogen, aluminum, magnesium, sulfate, potassium, zinc, nickel, chromium, calcium, ammonia
nitrogen, pH, and calcium carbonate equivalency.
4. An annual Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (fCLP) analysis of residual solids
Soil analysis for these parameters shall be conducted once prior to permit renewal on each site which
has received sludge during the permit cycle.

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
WATER TREATMENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT RESIDUAL SOLIDS COMBINED
�61

�q) (!) CCU 1-6 �0_�)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Non -Discharge Permit Application
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (corporation, individual, or other ): S&ME, Inc .
9 4,
2. Print Owners or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is legally v
responsible for the facility and its compliance): Mr. Lawrence R. Matthews,
President, S&ME, Inc.
3. Mailing Address: 3109 Spring Forest Road
City. Raleigh State: N.C. P= 27604
Telephone No.: 9( 19 1 872-2660
4. Application Date: March 17, 1993 5. Fee Submitted: $ 400.00
6. Name, address, & county of facility where sludge originated. Should
be referenced on any plans/specs., analytical results, Land Owner Agreements, etc.:
City of Mt. Holly Wastewater Treatment Plant
Broome Street
Mt. Holly, N.C. 28120 County Gaston
7. County (s) where sludge will be land applied: Gaston, Lincoln
8. Latitude: N/A ; Longitude N/A of land application sites.
For multiple sites attach a listing of the sites and a latitude and longitude for each.
9. Owner and address of lands where sludge will be land applied. For multiple sites attach
a listing:
(See Attachments)
FORM: LARS 4/91 Page 1 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 2 (4/91)
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Permit No. (will be completed by DEM): wN000 Ni�
2. Specify whether project is: new; renewal*; X modification.
*If renewal, complete only sections I, 11, land owner agreement,- & applicant
signature (on pg 24). Submit only pgs. 1, 2, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24 (original and 3
copies of each). Engineer signature not required for renewal.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an
existing permit, list the existing permit number WQ0001863 and issue date 6/26/92
4. Specify whether the applicant is public or X private.
III. PERMIT FEE INFORMATION:
1. Number of Total Acres on which residual solids are proposed to be land applied under
the authority of this permit (include both land currently permitted and proposed lands):
478.8
acres
2. The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).
IV. SITE INFORMATION:
1. A vicinity map must be attached. This map must show the location of each site in
relation to at least two geographical references (numbered roads, named streams/rivers,
etc.).
2. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached. This map
must be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not -exceeding ten feet or
25% of total site relief (whichever is more descriptive) and showing the property lines;
all existing wells, all surface waters and drainage ways and all dwellings within 500 feet
of the land application areas; and all buffers.
Note: At least the following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the
sites, larger buffers may be required:
a) 400 feet from any habitable residence for surface sludge application,
200 feet from any habitable residence for subsurface sludge injection
b) 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply
including wells.
2 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 3 (4/91)
c) 100 feet between surface sludge application area and waters classified as WS-II,
WS-III or B AND 100 feet between the disposal area and the Mean High Water
Level of waters classified as SA or SB.t
50 feet between subsurface sludge injection area and waters classified as WS-II,
WS-III or B AND 100 feet between the disposal area and the Mean High Water
Level of waters classified as SA or SB. t
d) 100 feet between any surface sludge application area and any stream, lake,
river, or natural drainage way. 50 feet between any subsurface sludge injection
area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.
e) 100 feet between the sludge application area and property lines.
f) 10 feet between the disposal area and any surface water interceptor drains or
diversions (upslope).
g) 25 feet between the disposal area and any surface water interceptor drains or
diversions (downslope) and any groundwater drainage systems.
t APPLICATION OF SLUDGE IN WATERSHEDS CLASSIFIED
AS WS-1 IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. SPECIFY THE NAME OF
AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CLOSEST DOWNSLOPE
SURFACE WATERS (as established by the Environmental
Management Commission and specified on page 4 of this application)
TO THE LAND APPLICATION SITE(S).
Note: The maximum slope for land application of residuals is 10% for surface
application and 18% for subsurface application.
3 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF V�.4,N a
PAGE 4 (4/91) R so,TF.crs AND
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application
activities will occur, as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): C S-Z W 5- C V
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: W. A ���� Date: I fq 9 1 q?
* As per converstation with Randy Jones, Professional Geologist, sig
nature gnature and
INSTRUCTIONS TO ENGINEER Seal will be accepted.
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application
activities will be located you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 10 completed,
to the appropriate Division of Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see
attached listing). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5
minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject surface waters. You must identify the
location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for which you are
requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be submitted
until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (corporation, individual, or other): S&AME, Inc.
2. Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: S&ME► Inc.
135-C Montlieu Avenue, P.O. Box 18169
City:Greensboro N.C.
State: Zip: 27419
Telephone No. [phone]
3. Project Name: Mt. Holly Land Application
500 dry tons/year - WWTP 1995-WTP
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied: _ 595 dry tons within April 30,cubic yards
5. Name of closest surface waters: ( See Attachment)
6. County(s) where land application site is located: Gaston and Lincoln
7. Map name and date: ( See Attachment)
Geologist's
8. North Carolina ProfessionalZ6jboi9o(x Registration No. 177
Geologist
9. Print Name of JfiQ�i G.F. Baker
10. Seal and Signature (specify date):
CAROM ••
''•CEDE 0G�5.
4 of 2N, NIF; gP`�F�, •`�,

*Please assign the appropriate stream classification for the
following proposed land application sites:
Farmer Field
Name of Surface Waters
Quad Map
Tony Jones 1
Leepers Creek & Killian
Lowesville, NC
Creek
2 thru 7
Killian Creek
Lowesville, NC
Gary Duckworth 1, 2, 7
Johnson Creek
Lake Norman South, NC
3, 4, 5, 6
Johnson Creek
Lowesville, NC
Charles A. Rhyne 1
Files Creek
Mount Holly, NC
Please send Stream Classification to:
S&ME, Inc.
135-C Montlieu Ave.
Greensboro, N.C. 27419
Attention: Rob Willcox

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGIONAL OFFICES (4/91)
Asheville Regional WQ Super.
Washington Regional WQ Super.
Raleigh Regional WQ Super. -
59 Woodfin Place
P O Box 1507 -
3800 Barrett Dr., Suite 101
Asheville, NC 28802
Washington, NC 27889
Raleigh, NC 27609
7041251-6208
919/946-6481
919n33-2314
Avery Macon
Beaufort Jones
Chatham Nash
Buncombe Mammon
Berne Lenoir
Durham Northampton
Burke McDowell
Camden Marvin
Edgecombe Orange
Caldwell Mitchell
Chowan Pamlico
Franklin Person
Cherokee Polk
Craven Pasquommk
Granville Vance
Clay Rutherford
Currituck Perquimans
Halifax Wake
Graham Swain
Dart Pitt
Johnston Warren
Haywood Transylvania
Gates Tyrell
Lee Wilson
Henderson Yancy
Greene Washington
Jackson
Hertford Wayne
Hyde
Fayetteville Regional WQ Super.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
919/486-1541
Mooresville Regional WQ Super.
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
704/663-1699
Wilmington Region. WQ Super.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3945
919I395-3900
Anson Moore
Alexander
Mecklenburg Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen Robeson
Cabamu
Rowan Cart= Onslow
Cumberland Richmond
Catawba
Stanly Columbus Pender
Harnett Sampson
Gaston
Union Duplin
Hoke, Scotland
Iredell .
Cleveland
Montgomery
Lincoln
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Super.
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
9191761-2351
Alarnance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
5 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 6 (4/9 l )
3. The following are the sites proposed to be used for land application under this permit
application (see attached map):
Site No. Owner Ass e Application Area Maximum sl oe
(excluding buffed in Mr cent l
(Reference Site Packages) facresl
Gary Duckworth Farm Section V.
Tony Jones Farm Section VI
Charles Rhyne Farm Section VII
Note:. If more than ten (10) sites are to be covered by this application, please attach a form listing
all of the sites along with the information listed above.
IV.INFORMATION ON MATERIAL TO BE LAND APPLIED
1.What are the sources of the residual solids and what volume of solids is anticipated to be land
applied from each source?
Source -County Permit Number of Source Estimated Volume
Sof Origin) (NPDES or Nondischarge) Dry Tons/year)
City of Mt. Holly WWTP Gaston NCO021156 500+/-
City of Mt. Holly WTP Gaston WQ0003444 595+/- befou95
If there are more than three sources of residual solids to be land applied to sites
covered by this permit, please add as an attachment to this form.
2. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33
YES_ NO x If yes, list the number(s):
6 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 7 (4/91)
b. Do any of the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics as defined by 40 CFR
261.21-261.24? YES_ NO x Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and Corrosivity
for each residual.
Nq±t: If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure Analyses are exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the
residuals is not within the range listed below, the residual is by definition a
Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection
Levels.
PPM
PPM
Arsenic
5.0
Barium
100.0
Benzene
0.5
Cadmium
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol
200.0
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.0
2,4-D
10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
13-Dichloroethylene
0.7
2,4-Dinitrot6luene
0.13
Endrin
0.02
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide) 0.008
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead
5.0
Lindane
0.4
Mercury
0.2
Methoxychlor
10.0
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
Pyridine
5.0
Selenium
1.0
Silver
5.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Toxaphene
0.5
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
pH (2:1
vol/wt.)
>2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
C. Please be advised that if any of the residuals meet the definitions of a
hazardous waste, as noted in either a. or b. above, a permit cannot be
issued for that material and it should not be included as part of this
application.
7 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 8 (4/91)
3. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This
analysis must be comprehensive enough to completely characterize the residual and must
be based on a review of the process that generates the material. If the facility that will
generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar
existing facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include
a minimum of the following parameters and any other known and suspected
contaminants that are tributary to the system.
% total solids Sulfate
Phosphorus Potassium
Lead Zinc
Copper Nickel
Cadmium Chromium
Sodium Calcium
Total Nitrogen Ammonia Nitrogen
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen pH
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation) Magnesium
4. What volume -of storage is available for each residual at its point of generation and
how often will the material need to be land applied?
Source Storage Volume (Daysl Needed F=uency of Application
(Daily, weekly.ygarly. etc.)
City of Mt. Holly WWTP 90 Days Quarterly
City of Mt. Holly WTP 1500 Days Yearly(or as demand basis)
If there are more than four sources of residual solids to be land applied to sites
covered by this permit, please add as an attachment to this form.
5. For each residual, please attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing
process or how the waste was generated (Please provide full and complete details of the entire
process). *Please reference "Sludge Characteristics" on Page 6 (Section 1)
and letter on following page.
8 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 9 (4/91)
6. For each residual, please aiiach an explanation of the process utilized for its stabilization. All
residuals generated by the treatment of an , domestic %wastewater must be stabilized by a
process to significantlN+ reduce pathogens (PSRP as described in 40 CFR Part 257, Appendix
II) prior to application or incorporation. Please attach supporting calculations to substantiate
compliance with 40 CFR Pan 257, Appendix 11. *Please reference letter on following
IV. MATERIAL TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION
*Please reference "Management Plan" Page 1 (Section 1)
1. For each source, please attach an explanation of how the residual will be delivered to the
land application site (in leak proof trucks to a terragator, etc.) and what type of equipment "
will be utilized for land application ( terragator, etc.).
2. Please attach an explanation of how the land application of the residual will be controlled to
insure that there is proper distribution over the site.
3. Will the operation utilize a contractor who specializes in Residual Management or will the
permittee manage the program? Contractor _ Pemtittee x If a contractor is utilized,
please provide the name of the fum, a contact, address, and telephone number.
Application Subcontractor: Advanced Waste Management Services. Inc.
—P.O. Box 38040; 2 5 harles City Rd Richmond Va. 23231
Cont act: Mr. Gary Steele, President AWMS [phone]
V . SITE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED LOADING RATES
1: For each site, please attach a site evaluation of the site/sites by a soils scientist (the
evaluation must be signed by the soil scientist) which addresses soil color, the depth,
thickness and type of restrictive horizons; the "presence or absence of a seasonal high water
table or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of sludge or residual
application; and cation exchange capacity. If the depth to either groundwater or bedrock is
less than three feet, please also attach a demonstration, using predictive calculations or
modeling methods acceptable to the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, that the use of this site will not result in contravention of classified
groundwater standards as contained in NCAC 2L .0200. In no case shall the
separation be less than one foot.
2. Please attach a representative soils analysis of each site. The soils analysis shall include the
following parameters along with any other significant parameter that has been shown to be
contained in the residual:
Standard Soil Fertility Test
% Base Saturation
Phosphorus
Potassium
Lead
Zinc
Magnesium
pH
Manganese
Cation Exchange Capacity
Sodium
Nickel
Cadmium
Copper
Calcium
3. In order to determine if the site(s) can be permitted, an evaluation must be made to establish
whether the residuals are compatible with the soils on each site. For each site, please
attach a soil scientist recommendations concerning application rates for liquids, solids,
nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any other significant contaminant know to
be in the sludge or residual.
4. In order to assist DEM in the review of the proposed loading rates, please complete the
calculations contained in the attachment titled "Calculations Work Sheet". If more than one
residual is to be covered by this permit, additional worksheets must be attached.
9 of 25
page.

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE IS CURRENTLY BEING LIME STABILIZED

l
City of Mount Holly
Post Office Box 406
Mount Holly, North Carolina 28120
k;f►t bo
Faye S. Little, Councilwoman
Lib Nichols, Councilwoman
'►., i
Myles Biggerstaff, Councilman
.�.
Charles B'ILBlack, Jr. Mayor
Bob Jessen, Mayor Pro -Tern
March 11, 1991
John Vincent
Staff Agronomist
Westinghouse Environmental and
Geotechnical Services, Incorporated
Post office Box 58069
Raleigh, North Carolina 27658-8069
Re: Pathogen Reduction
Dear Mr. Vincent;
Archie Small, Councilman
R.L Duke, Councilman
Greg Young, City Manager
In response to your letter of February 8, 1991, following is
a list of treatment units with the retention time and
average temperature of each.
Retention Time Avg.Temp. - Range
Equalization basin -
24 hrs.
22.7 C
185-26.3 C
Aeration basins -
48 hrs.
15.8 C
11.6-19.6 C
Secondary clarifiers -
3.6 hrs.
14.1 C
10.5-17 C
Sludge holding tanks -
4 mos. (aver)
10.2 C
0.5C-13.3 C
Retention times are based on a design flow of 4 MGD with the
exception of the equalization basin which receives half of
design flow. The City does not routinely record
temperatures of these units, so figures are based on data
recorded from 2/15/91 to 3/6/91. Temperatures of basins
appear to vary with air temperature.
Volutile solids concentrations are as follows:
Influent - 75.68%
Sludge - 30.7%
If the information provided is not sufficient, please
advise.
Sincerely,
W. E. Nichols
Public Works Director
WN/jb

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 10 (4/91)
VI. AGRONOMIST REPORT
*Please reference "Site Packages" (Sections'V—VII)
For each site, please attach a project evaluation conducted by an agronomist including
recommendations concerning cover crops and their ability to accept the proposed loading of
liquids, solids, nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any other contaminant know to
be in the sludge or residual. A part of the agronomists recommendations must be a crop
management plan. This plan must determine the crops to be grown on the sitelsites, when
they should be grown and how they should be harvested and ma: keted. This report must be
signed by the agronomist.
VII.GENERAL INFORMATION
1 • (5) copies of the permit application and all supporting information must be submitted
or the application will be returned as incomplete.
2. Please attach an explanation as to the methods to be used to control access to the land
application sites by both people and animals following the application of residuals.
N=:a. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application sites within 30 days of
the application of residuals to the site.
b. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land
application sites during the active site use and for 12 months following the last
application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted.at the site.
3. Please explain the.procedures to be used to establish and maintain the buffers during the
application process (i.e. will the sites be flagged). -
4. Please attach an executed "Agreement For the Land Application of Residuals to Private
Land Form" for each site that is proposed to receive residuals which is not owned by the
applicant. A copy of a DEM approved form is attached. If the applicant wishes to use a
different form or a modified form, prior approval must be receive from DEM.
5. Each application site must be assigned a site identification number.
6. All attachments to the permit application form, must be numbered to correspond to the
individual parts of the application that requi-e that attachment. If the attachments are part of
a larger document, a table must be provided that lists the locations of the required
information.
10 of 25

REPORT N ER
R277-57A
A & L EASTERN AGRICUL IAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 WHITEPINE ROAD, RICHMOND, VA 23237
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
SEND SBIME
TO:
ATTN: RICK BAKER
P 0 BOX 18169
GREENSBORO, NC 27419
DATE OF REPORT 10 01192 PAGE 1
SAMPLES
CUSTOMER: P 0 #1380 SUBMITTED
JOB #1584-92-005 BY:
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
ROB WILLCOX
SAMPLE
Lab
Solids
Nitrogen
Phoe-
Potaa-
alum
Suffur
Calcium
Mag-
neeium
Sodium
Iron
Aluml-
num
Mange-
nese
Copper
Zinc
Zn
Amrtlanla
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
IDENT.
No.
%
% TKN
phorus
% P
% K
% S
% Ca
% Mg
%Na
ppm Fe
ppm AI
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm
%
ppm
MT. HOLLY
WWTP
34799
3.42
6.43
1.97
0:18
1.56
3.77
0.34
0.71
1146C
12200
263
620
1360
1.46
250
LAB
Cad-
Chro-
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
pH
Calcium
Carbonate
Volatile
Solids
Organic
Nitrogen
Molyb-
donum
Chlondo
Boron
NO.
mium
ppm Cd
mium
ppm Cr
ppm Ni
ppm Pb
ppm As
ppm Hg
ppm Se
Eq. %
%
%
ppm Mo
ppm Cl
ppm
34799
3.5
1300
110
120
7.7
2170
All values except % Solids are on a dry weight basis. To convert % to mg/1 CPP�AUL
ultiply by 00.C. . CHU, D.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In put, not may any reference be
made to the work, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcement without obtaining our prior written authorlLtlon.
This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are
retain maximum of thirty days of testing.
$ U44U T NI S, INC.

REPORT D 3ER A & L EASTERN AGRICUI RAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R5-126A 7621 WHrTEPINE ROAD, RICHMOND, VA 23237 [phone]
AtL
SEND SAMPLES
TO: WESTINGHOUSE ENV & GEO SERVICES INEUSTOMER: MT HOLLY WTP SUBMITTED ROB WILLCOX
3109 SPRING FOREST ROAD BY:
P 0 BOX 58069
RALEIGH, NC 27658
DATE OF REPORT 01/15/92 PAGE 1 SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE
Lab,
Solids
NitrogenPhoe-
Pollee-
alum
SuHur .:
Calcium.
'Mag'
neslum
Sodium
Iron ,
Aluml.
Mango
rises
Copper
Zina
Zn
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen(DENT,
NO.
%
% TKN
Phorus
% P
% K
,� 6..
,�
% Mg
: % ,�
ppm Fe
.. m
ppm At
ppm Mn
PPm Cu
ppm
%'
rn
WTP
ALUM
SLUDGE
30133
9.53
0.52
0.20
0.11
0.29
0.08
0.30
0.03
64000
58
72 1
0.01
220
LAB
Cad-
Chro-
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Calcium
Carbonate
Volatile
Solids
Organic
Nitrogen
Moiyb-
denurtt
Chloride
Boron
NO2-N
NO.
mium
ppm Cd
mium
ppm Cr
ppm NI
ppm Pb
ppm As
ppm Hg
ppm Se
pH
Eq. %
%
%
ppm Mo
ppm Cl
ppm
nnm
30133
0.5
30
35 45
6.3
515
1.10
AUL C.H. CHU, PH D
All values except % Solids am on a dry weight basis. To convert % to mgA (ppm) multiply by 10,000.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in pert, nor may any reference be
made to the world the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
Thn repes only to the sample(e) tested. Sampl ere
retalr adort mF�IUL'ummhrday,A & L T
J

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 11 (4/91)
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
This worksheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management
in reviewing this application as expeditiously as potisible. Its preparation in a
complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover
multiple sources of residuals, different residuals from the same source or sites
with varied CEC, use additional work sheets.
A. LIST THE SPECIFIC RESIDUAL THAT IS COVERED BY THESE
CALCULATIONS (PLACE OR PROCESS OF ORIGIN) AND ITS PERMIT
NUMBER.
Water Treatment and Wastewater Treatment Sludges Combined
What is the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Tons of Residual x % total solids
595 tons WTP x 500 tons WWTP
x
1095 Tons
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger
initial application, please attach a detailed explanation and provide calculations for
each variation.
B . COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS THAT ESTABLISH THE
PORTION OF THE RESIDUAL MADE UP OF THE VARIOUS
PARAMETERS. LIST ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS AS NEEDED.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL
CONCENTRATIONS.
PARAMETER
%
x 10.000
mg/kg-
x .002
LBS/DRY TON
rye
TKN
6.95
10000 =
69,500
0.002 =
139.0
AMMONTIA-N
1.47
i0000 =
14,700
0.002 =
29.4
N04-NO3-N
10000 =
471
0.002 =
0.94
PHOSPHORUS
2.17
10000 =
21,700
0.002 =
43.4
SULFUR
1.85
10000=
18,500
0.002 =
37.0
POTASSIUM
0.29
10000 =
2,900
0.002 =
5.8
CALCIUM
3.85
10000 =
38,500
0.002 =
77.0
MAGNESIUM
0.64
10000 =
6,400
0.002 =
12.8
SODIUM
0.74
10000 =
7,400
0.002 =
14.8
IRON
10000 =
11,460
0.002 =
22.92
11 of 25

ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
COPPER
ZINC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ARSENIC
MERCURY
SELENIUM
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 12 (4/91)
76,200
0.002 =
152.4
263
0.002 =
0.526
678
0.002 =
1.36
1,432
0.002 =
2.86
4.0
0.002 =
0.008
1,330
0.002 =
2.66
145
0.002 =
0.29
125
0.002 =
0.25
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
C. CALCULATE SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR)
9.53 WTP
TOTAL SOLIDS % = 3.42 WWTP %
SAR = Na Milli Equiv. i [0.5 (Ca Milli Equiv. + Mg Milli Equiv.)] 0-5
CONCENTRATION(mg/1) + Equivalent Wt. = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 7,400 (mg/1) + 23 = — 321_7
CALCIUM (Ca) 38,500 (mg/1) i 20 = 1925.0
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 6,400 (mg/1) 1 12 = M 533.3
SAR = 9.18
12 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 13 (4/91)
D.PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) CALCULATIONS AND
APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS
TKN
AMMONIA-N
N04-NO3-N
MINERALIZATION RATE
__69, 500�_____
14,700
471
(MR) 30 %
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can
be used for domestic wastewater treatment residuals. If actual values are
established, attach the documentation: The default values are as follows):
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30 %
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific
default value chosen is appropriate.)
(Complete the following calculations for only the application method proposed)
PAN FOR SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + .5x(NH3) + NO3/NO2
PAN= 0.30 x ( 69,500 - 14, 700 ) +.5x 14L 700 ) + 471
24,261
PAN = (PPM DRY WEIGHT)
OR
*All residuals will be surface applied to pasture and hay land
PAN FOR SUBSURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + (NH3) + NO3fN`O2
PAN= x( - )+( )+
PAN = (PPM DRY WEIGHT)
13 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 14 (4/91)
TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR 24,.602 lbs PAN
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR 1095 tons
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (mg/kg DRY VN'1) x 2000 POUNDS /TON
PER DRY TON 1,000,000 _
= PAN (PPM DRY WEIGHT) x .002
POUNDS/TON
*22,460 lbs PAN in WWTP Sludge
+2,142 lbs PAN -in WTP Sludge - 24,602 lbs PAN
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (POUNDSITON) x TOTAL TONS OF
RESIDUAL
POUNDS
DUE TO THE FACT THAT ORGANIC NITROGEN IS MINERALIZED SLOWLY
OVER TIME, THE AMOUNT OF NITROGEN THAT COMES AVAILABLE IN
YEARS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL APPLICATION MUST BE TAKEN INTO
CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING APPLICATION RATES FOR THE
SUBSEQUENT YEARS. THIS BEING THE CASE PLEASE ATTACH AN
EVALUATION OF THIS FACTOR AND ITS IMPACT ON LOADING RATES.
SHOW THE ADJUSTED PAN FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM ADJUSTED ANNUAL PAN IS 125 POUNDS
CROP INFORMATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE PER YEAR
CROP(S) N-UPTAKE OF CROP
LBS/ACRE
Fescue 250 LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used:
Accepted uptake rates taken from the existing permit
14 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 15 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POIJNDS OF AVAILABLE
NITROGEN CALCULATED ABON'E
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = MAX TOTAL LBS. OF AVAILABLE NITROGEN
POUNDS OF NITROGEN NEEDED FOR CROP*
— 24,602 lbs PAN ;250 lbs PAN/AC*
98.4 ACRES
*Note: All currently permitted sites are in fescue hay or pasture production
THIS VALUE MUST BE THE VALUE FOR THE CROP TO BE GROWN
THAT HAS THE LOWEST NITROGEN UPTAKE RATE PER ACRE
IF THERE ARE VARIOUS CROPS THAT WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR
CERTAIN SITES, PLEASE ATTACH THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
SITE AND DETERMINE THE TOTAL NEEDED ACRES USING THE
FORMAT OUTLINED ABOVE.
E. ANNUAL CADMIUM CALCULATIONS AND APPLICATION AREA
REQUIREMENTS
TAKE CALCULATED POUNDS PER DRY TON FOR CADMIUM FROM B.
ABOVE = 0.008
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
= N/A
TOTAL CADMIUM IN POUNDS = CADMIUM (POUNDS/TON) x TOTAL
TONS OF RESIDUAL LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
N/A x
N/A
4.095 POUNDS
3.5 lbs Cd in WWTP Sludge
0.595 lbs Cd in WTP Sludge 4.095 Total lbs Cd
MAXIMUM CADMIUM LOADING RATE AS ALLOWED BY 40 CFR
257.3-5 IS 0.5 KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE OR 0.445 POUNDS PER
ACRE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF TOTAL
CADMIUM CALCULATED ABOVE:
15 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 16 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = TOTAL POUNDS OF CADNITUM
0.445 POUNDS PER ACRE PER YEAR
4.095 lbs Cd •/. 0.445 lbs Cd/Ac
9.2 ACRES
F. DETERMINE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES NEEDED FOR LAND
APPLICATION BY COMPARING THE ACRES NEEDED FOR PAN AND
THAT NEEDED FOR CADMIUM. WHAT IS THE LIMITING FACTOR:
PAN x OR CADMIUM . HOW MANY ACRES ARE NEEDED?
98.4 _MW MANY ACRES-707F LAND APPLICATION ARE AVAILABLE?
4/8-4F THE .ACRES AVAILABLE DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE
ACRES NEEDED, THE APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED AND
WILL BE RETURNED.
IF CALCULATION SHEETS ARE BEING COMPLETED FOR MORE THAN
ONE RESIDUAL OR SITE, PLEASE ATTACH A SUMMARY SHEET
THAT BRING THE RESULTS OF ALL THE CALCULATION SHEETS TO
ONE POINT.
G. DETERMINE THE SITE LIFE FOR THIS LAND APPLICATION SITE:
NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETERMINATION, THE
LIFETIME HEAVY METAL LOADINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED
THE FOLLOWING FOR THE CORRESPONDING CATION
EXCHANGE CAPACITIES (CEC).
Parameter
CEC <
Lead (lbs/acre)
500
Zinc (lbs/acre)
250
CoPPa (lbs/acre)
125
Nickel (lbs/acre)
125
Cadmium (lbs/acre)
4.5
EC 5-15
CEC > 15
1000
2000
500
1000
250
500
250
500
9
18
SITE LIFE FOR THE SITE COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION THAT HAS
THE LOWEST CEC
THE SITE LIFE IS DETERMINED BY CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF YEARS
THAT THE SITE WITH THE LOWEST CEC CAN RECEIVE THE RESIDUAL WITHOUT
EXCEEDING THE ABOVE LIFETIME METALS LOADINGS. FOR EACH OF THESE
METALS COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS.
16 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
1. SITE LIFE BASED ON LEAD PAGE 17 (4/91)
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL = 0.25 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR =10 tons Ac/Yr*
POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.25 lbs/tonx 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE =_( 500 lbs/Ac )_ = 200 YEARS
( 2.5 lbs/Ac Yr )
*Based on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
2. SITE LIFE BASED ON ZINC Assume all CEC's 4 5 meq/100 g
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL = 2.86 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR =2.86 lbs/ton, 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LHETmm ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 250 lbs/Ac = 8.7 YEARS
( 28.6 lbs/Ac/Yr )
3. SITE LIFE BASED ON COPPER
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF COPPER IN RESIDUAL = 1.36 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR =1.36 lbs/t x 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _(_ 125 lbs /Ac )_ = 9.2 YEARS'
( 13.6 lbs/Ac/Yr )
17 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 18 (4/91)
4. SITE LIFE BASED ON NICKEL
PROTECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF NICKEL IN RESIDUAL = 0.29 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.29 lbs/tonx 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFE DJE ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 125 lb s /Ac I =
2.9 lbs/Ac/Yr )
5. SITE LIFE BASED ON CADMIUM
43.1
YEARS
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF CADMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.008 lbs /ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR =0.008 1bs�ton10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE4.5 lbs/Ac = 56.2 YEARS
0.08 lbs/Ac/Yr )
COMPARE THE FIVE METALS ABOVE AND DETERMINE THE METAL
THAT WILL RESULT IN THE SHORTEST SITE LIFE FOR THIS SITE.
THE METAL IS Zinc AND THE SITE LIFE IS 8•7*
YEARS. *Based on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr of residual also
assuming all CEC's are4 5 meq/100 g.
6. Site life based on Aluminum
Pounds per ton of aluminum in residual = 152.4 lbs/ton
Pounds of aluminum applied per acre per year = 1,520.4 lbs/Ac/Yr
Site Life = 15,000 lbs/Ac* __
1520.4 lbs/Ac/Yr 9.8 Years
*No current limits on aluminum loadings - 15,000 lbs/Ac chosen as
conservative loadings.
18of25

* EXECUTED AGREEMENT FORMS IN SECTIONS V
LA-
% APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 19 (4/91)
l.oro Carolina DiDision of
(ttviroumenta l fila nagemeut
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS -
Permitter:
Contact Person:
Address of Permit=:
List of Sludges or residuals to be applied to these lands:
Site ID Number.
Field Number.
Location of Land to be used for sludge or residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for sludge or residual application:
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns:
Intended use or disposition of crops:
IllllilgqligllllllgllitRlliilglllllqllllgl11111I11I11I11Ill1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIgI{illllllliq
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed sludges or residuals upon the land
at the location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as
given below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the
nutrient value of the applied sludge or residuals while the Permittee receives, in eonsidaation, the
use of the land described above for the disposal of digested sludge or residuals. This agreement
shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned
land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions
and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies
or cancels this Land owner's Aemement .
19of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 20 (4/91)
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
IIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIIIlilll111111111111111111111111111IIIIt1I1111111111111111111111111111lllllilllllttlllllillillllllll
STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and
State Officials or their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to,
during, and after sludge or residual application and to established monitoring
facilities on or near the application site as required by the sludge or residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State
Officials or their representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water
samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Pcrmittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of sludge or residual
application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will delineate maximum application rates,
limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Perrmttee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and
data concerning the program for land application of sludge or residuals to privately
owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the sludge, sludge
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee for sludge or residual application.
5. Ile Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge or
residual application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5
provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
sludgelresidual and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permitter of any revisions or
modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each
planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine
sludge/residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period of
eighteen (18) months following sludge application.
20 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent
sludge application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permictee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Perminee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agt CM=L
13.77he existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this AgttemenL
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
=2ch
shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall be given by the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or
incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly .authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the application site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachwc,
III11111111ItI11I111I11111111tI11111111111111111111t111111111I1I111111Illllllllllit11111111111111111l11111111IIIIIII
RESTRICTIONS •
21 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
I1111111I1111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII I Iilllllllllllltlllllltl I111111111111111111111Illllllll11111tlilllll111111111111111
I. have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission to the
Perminaa to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
NORTH CAROLINA,
COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrumenL
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission Expires
SEAL
I. have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
I. have read this land owners agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
22 of 25
Date
,19_
Lessee
Date
Perrnttee
Date

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 23 (4/91)
Land Application of Residual Solids
Instructions
Processing of this application will not initiate until all of the following items have
been submitted in addition to five(5) copies of the completed application form. If any of
the above items have been excluded from the package, please explain.
1. Is a general location map included? YES x or NO
2. Is a site map (drawn to scale) included which shows the property lines,
buffers, existing wells within 500 feet, topography, drainage features, and any
surface waters?
YES x or NO
3. Is a vicinity map enclosed which clearly indicates the projects location with
respect to State roads and named Surface waters?
YES x or NO
4. Is a soil scientist report included which defines the following:
a) field descriptions of texture, color, and structure,
b) depth and thickness of soil horizons,
c) presence of any restrictive soil horizons or layers,
d) depth to seasonal high water table,
e) the hydraulic conductivity,
f) recommendation of a loading rate for the site,
g) cation exchange capacity.
YES x or NO
5. Is an agronomist's crop and loading recommendations for N-P-K included?
YES x or NO
6. Has the Land Owner's agreement been filled out and completed?
YES x or NO
7. Appropriate fee in accordance with 15 NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).
YES x or NO
8. Five copies of all reports, evaluations, agreements, supporting calculations, etc.
must be submitted as a part of the proposed design document which is signed and
sealed by the North Carolina Professional Engineer. Although certain portions of
this required submittal must be developed by other professionals,.inclusion of
these materials under the signature and seal of a North Carolina Professional
Engineer signifies that he has reviewed this material and has judged it to be
consistent with his proposed design.
23 of .25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 24 (4/91)
Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm:
37.18 Old Battleground Road
City:
Greensboro
Telephone No. [phone]. .
Geologist's
Professional En9neiezis Certification:
I, G.F. Baker
State:
S&ME, Inc.
N. C.
Zip: 27410 _
, attest that this application for Modification
of Permit No. WQ0001863 has been reviewed by me and is accurate
and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge the
proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain
portions of this submittal package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of
these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and have
judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
Geologist's
North Carolina Professional i8 Registration No. 177
Print Name of EngimcR G. F. Bakei-
*Per conversation with Randy Jones, Professional Geologist Seal and Signature
Seal and Signature (specify date): will be accepted
Applicant's Certification:
I Robert P. Willcox, Jr.
of Permit No. WQ0001863
attest that this application for Modification
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting
information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as
incomplete.
Signature - �,.�--r.� -- Date _ 3 //g/f-3
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHO ULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 919/733-5083
24 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 25 (4/91)
PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING FEES
(effective October 1,1990)
CATEGORY NEW APPLICATIONS/ RENEWALS WFMOUT
MODIFICATIONS MODIFICATIONS
► 1/1 /11 • �
Industrial
$400
$300
Domestic/Cooling Water
$400
$300
10,001 - 1,000,000 GPD
Industrial
$400
$250
Domestic/Cooling Water
$400
$250
1,001 - 10,000 GPD
Industrial
$400
$200 .
Domestic/Cooling Water
$400
$200
< or =1,000 GPD and
Single Family Dwelling
$240
$120
Sludge < or = 300 Acres
$400
$250
Sludge > 300 Acres
$400
$250
Sewer Extensions
(nondelegated) $400 0
Sewer Extensions
(delegated) $200 0
Closed -Loop Recycle
or Evaporative $400 $200
NOTE: The Fees for Soil Remediation Projects are the same as for Sludges.
Under the Sewer Extension Fee, "delegated to municipalities" applies
only to those governmental jurisdictions that have specific delegation
review authority, as granted by the Division of Environmental
Management.
25 of 25

•
L7
•
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS_
APPLICATION FORM
MT. HOLLY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
10

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 11 (4/91)
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
This worksheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management
in reviewing this application as expeditiously as possible. Its preparation in a
complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover
multiple sources of residuals, different residuals from the same source or sites
with varied CEC, use additional work sheets.
A. LIST THE SPECIFIC RESIDUAL THAT IS COVERED BY THESE
CALCULATIONS (PLACE OR PROCESS OF ORIGIN) AND ITS PERMIT
NUMBER.
City of Mt. Holly WWTP - Permit No. NCO021156
What is the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Tons of Residual x % total solids
3,000,000galsx 4.0%
500 +/- Tons
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger
initial application, please attach a detailed explanation and provide calculations for
each variation.
B . COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS THAT ESTABLISH THE
PORTION OF THE RESIDUAL MADE UP OF THE VARIOUS
PARAMETERS. LIST ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS AS NEEDED.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL
CONCENTRATIONS.
PARAMETER
%
x 10,000
mE/kQ
x .002
LBS/DRY TON
r m
TKN
6.43
10000 =
64,300
0.002 =
128.6
AMMONIA-N
1.46
10000 =
14,600
0.002 =
29.2
NO4-NO3-N
10000 =
250
0.002 =
0.5
PHOSPHORUS
1.97
10000 =
19,700
0.002 =
39.4
SULFUR
1.56
10000 =
15,600
0.002 =
31.2
POTASSIUM
0.18
10000 =
1,800
0.002 =
3.6
CALCIUM
3.77
10000=
37,700
0.002 =
75.4
MAGNESIUM.
0.34
10000 =
3, 400
0.002 =
6.8
SODIUM
0.71
10000 =
7,100
0.002 =
14.2
IRON
10000 =
11,460
0.002 =
22.92
11 of 25

ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
COPPER
ZINC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ARSENIC
MERCURY
SELENIUM
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 12 (4/91)
12,200
0.002 =
24.4
263
0.002 =
0.526
620
0.002 =
1.24
1,360
0.002 =
2:72
3.5
0.002 =
0.007
1,300
0.002 =
2.6
110
0.002 =
0.22
120
0.002 =
0.24
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002
0.002 =
0.002
0.002
C. CALCULATE SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR)
TOTAL SOLIDS % = 3.42 %
SAR = Na Milli Equiv. i [0,5 (Ca Milli Equiv. + Mg Milli Equiv.)] Os
CONCENTRATION(mg/l) 1 Equivalent Wt. = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 7,100 (mg/1) 1 23 = 308.7
CALCIUM (Ca) 37,700 (mg/1) i 20 = 1, 885.0
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 3,400 (mg/1) i 12 = 283.3
SAR = 9.38
12of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 13 (4/91)
D.PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) CALCULATIONS AND
APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS
TKN
AMMONIA-N
N04-NO3-N
MINERALIZATION RATE
[lamas "WKWHEN an
64,300
14,600
-------------
250
(MR) 30
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can
be used for domestic wastewater treatment residuals. If actual values are
established, attach the documentation: The default values are as follows):
Lime Stabilized
30%
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals
40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals
30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals
20%
Composted Residuals
10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific
default value chosen is appropriate.)
*Mt. Holly WWTP has aerobically digested residuals which have also been
lime stabilized
(Complete the following calculations for only the application method proposed)
PAN FOR SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NI13) +-Sx(NH3) + NO3/NO2
PAN= 0.30 g ( 64,300 - 14,600 ) + Sx 14( , 600 ) + 250
PAN = 22,460 (PPM DRY WEIGHT)
*All residuals will be surface applied to pasture and hay land
PAN FOR SUBSURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + (NH3) + NO3/NO2
PAN= x ( - ) + ( ) +
PAN = (PPM DRY WEIGHT)
13 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 14 (4/9I )
TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR 22,460 lbs. PAN
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR 500+/-
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (mt,/kg DRY VN'1j x 2000 POUNDS / TON
PER DRY TON 1,000,000
= PAN (PPM DRY WEIGHT) x .002
44.92 POUNDS/TON
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (POUNDSI TON) x TOTAL TONS OF
RESIDUAL
44.92 lbs/ton X 500 DT
22,460 POUNDS
DUE TO THE FACT THAT ORGANIC NITROGEN IS MINERALIZED SLOWLY
OVER TIME, THE AMOUNT OF NITROGEN THAT COMES AVAILABLE IN
YEARS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL APPLICATION MUST BE TAKEN INTO
CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING APPLICATION RATES FOR THE
SUBSEQUENT YEARS. THIS BEING THE CASE PLEASE ATTACH AN
EVALUATION OF THIS FACTOR AND ITS IMPACT ON LOADING RATES.
SHOW THE ADJUSTED PAN FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM ADJUSTED ANNUAL PAN IS 125 POUNDS
CROP INFORMATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE PER YEAR
CROP(S) N-UPTAKE OF CROP
LBS/ACRE
F s 250 LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used:
Accepted uptake rates taken from the existing permit
14 of 25

LAND APPLICATON OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 15 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POI INDS OF AVAILABLE
NITROGEN CALCULATED ABOVE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = MAX. TOTAL LBS OF AVAILABLE NITROGEN
POUNDS OF NITROGEN NEEDED FOR CROP*
22,460 lbs PAN-250 lbs/PAN/Ac*
89.84 ACRES
*Note: All currently permitted sites are in fescue hay or pasture production
• THIS VALUE MUST BE THE VALUE FOR THE CROP TO BE GROWN
THAT HAS THE LOWEST NITROGEN UPTAKE RATE PER ACRE
IF THERE ARE VARIOUS CROPS THAT WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR
CERTAIN SITES, PLEASE ATTACH THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
SITE AND DETERMINE THE TOTAL NEEDED ACRES USING THE
FORMAT OUTLINED ABOVE.
E. ANNUAL CADMIUM CALCULATIONS AND APPLICATION AREA
REQUIREMENTS
TAKE CALCULATED POUNDS PER DRY TON FOR CADMIUM FROM B.
ABOVE- 0.007 lbs/ton
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
500 tons
TOTAL CADMIUM IN POUNDS = CADMIUM (POUNDS/TON) x TOTAL
TONS OF RESIDUAL LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
— 0.007 lbs/ton x 500 tons
3.5 POUNDS
MAXIMUM CADMIUM LOADING RATE AS ALLOWED BY 40 CFR
257.3-5 IS 0.5 KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE OR 0.445 POUNDS PER
ACRE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF TOTAL
CADMIUM CALCULATED ABOVE:
15 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 16 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = TOTAL P011INDS OF CADMIUM
0.445 POUNDS PER ACRE PER YEAR
3.5 lbs/Cdz0.445 lbs Cd/Ac
7.87 ACRES
F. DETERMINE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES NEEDED FOR LAND
APPLICATION BY COMPARING THE ACRES NEEDED FOR PAN AND
THAT NEEDED FOR CADMIUM. WHAT IS THE LIMITING FACTOR:
PAN X OR CADMIUM . HOW MANY ACRES ARE NEEDED?
89.84 --ff0W MANY ACRESFF LAND APPLICATION ARE AVAILABLE?
478.8IF THE ACRES AVAILABLE DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE
ArRES NEEDED, THE APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED AND
WILL BE RETURNED.
IF CALCULATION SHEETS ARE BEING COMPLETED FOR MORE THAN
ONE RESIDUAL OR SITE, PLEASE ATTACH A SUMMARY SHEET
THAT BRING THE RESULTS OF ALL THE CALCULATION SHEETS TO
ONE POINT.
G. DETERMINE THE SITE LIFE FOR THIS LAND APPLICATION SITE:
NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETERMINATION, THE
LIFETIME HEAVY METAL LOADINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED
THE FOLLOWING FOR THE CORRESPONDING CATION
EXCHANGE CAPACITIES (CEC).
Parameter CEC <
Lead (Ibs/acre) 500
Zinc (Ibs/acre) 250
Copper (Ibs/acre) 125
Nickel (Ibs/acre) 125
Cadmium (lbs/acre) 4.5
CEC 5-15
CEC > 15
1000
2000 .
500
1000
250
500
250
500
9
18
SITE LIFE FOR THE SITE COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION THAT HAS
THE LOWEST CEC
THE SITE LIFE IS DETERMINED BY CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF YEARS
THAT THE SITE WITH THE LOWEST CEC CAN RECEIVE THE RESIDUAL WITHOUT
EXCEEDING THE ABOVE LIFETIME METALS LOADINGS. FOR EACH OF THESE
METALS COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS.
16 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 17 (4/91)
i . SITE LIFE BASED ON LEAD
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL = 0.24 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons*
POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 0.24lbs/tonx 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIEE= OWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = _( 500 lbs/Ac ) = 208.3
( £Tl s c r
)*Based
Assume
2. SITE LIFE BASED ON ZINC
on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
all CEC's< 5 meq/100 g
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL = 2.72 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
�—
POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 2.72 lbs/ton x 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LI E'TME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 250 lbs/Ac
( 27.2 lbs/Ac/Yr )
3. SITE LIFE BASED ON COPPER
9.2 YEARS
PROJECIED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF COPPER IN RESIDUAL = 1.24 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 1.24 lbs/ tpn10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LSE ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 125 lbs/Ac 1 _ 10.1 YEARS
( 12.4 lbs/Ac/Yr )
17 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 18 (4/9 I )
4. SITE LIFE BASED ON NICKEL
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF NICKEL IN RESIDUAL = - 0. 22 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = 0.22 lbs/tonx 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFE7= ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CE
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 125 lbs/Ac _
( 2.2 lbs/Ac/Yr
5. SITE LIFE BASED ON CADMIUM
56.8
YEARS
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RES IDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF CADMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.007 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 0.0071bs x /ton10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LI ETIIvIE ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 4.5 lb s /Ac _
( 0.07 lbs/Ac/Yr )
64.3
YEARS
COMPARE THE FIVE METALS ABOVE AND DETERMINE THE METAL
THAT WILL RESULT IN THE SHORTEST SITE LIFE FOR THIS SITE.
THE METAL IS zinc AND THE SITE LIFE IS 9.2*
*Based on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr of residual
YEARS. also assuming all CEC's are< 5 MEQ/100 g
6. Site Llfe Based on Aluminum
Pounds per ton of aluminum in residual = 24.4 lbs/ton
Pounds of Aluminum applied per acre per year = 244.0 lbs/Ac/Yr
Site Life = 15,000 lbs/Ac* 244.0 lbs/Ac/Yr __61.5 years
*Not current limits on aluminum loadings - 15,000 lbs/Ac chosen as cd.nservative
loadings.
18 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS_
APPLICATION FORM
MT. HOLLY WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
11

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 11 (4/91)
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
This worksheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management
in reviewing this application as expeditiously as possible. Its preparation in a
complete and accurate manner is. critical to this review. For permits that cover
multiple sources of residuals, different residuals from the same Source or sites
with varied CEC, use additional work sheets.
A. LIST THE SPECIFIC RESIDUAL THAT IS COVERED BY THESE
CALCULATIONS (PLACE OR PROCESS OF ORIGIN) AND ITS PERMIT
NUMBER.
City of Mt. Holly WTP - Permit No. WQ0003444
What is the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Tons of Residual x % total solids
1,500,000 x 9.53
595+/ Tons on an as demand basis
*Total dry tons of WTP residual to be land applied within remainder of permit*
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger
initial application, please attach a detailed explanation and provide calculations for
each variation.
B . COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS THAT ESTABLISH THE
PORTION OF THE RESIDUAL MADE UP OF THE VARIOUS
PARAMETERS. LIST ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS AS NEEDED.
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL
CONCENTRATIONS.
PARAMETER % x 10.000 mg/kg_ x .002 LBS/DRY TON
-fdr K
TKN
0.52
10000 =
5,200
0.002 =
1o.4
AMMONIA-N
0.01
10000 =
100
0.002 =
0.2
N04-NO3-N
10000 =
221
0.002 =
0. 44
PHOSPHORUS
0.20
10000 =
2,000
0.002 =
4.0
SULFUR
0.29
10000 =
2,900
0.002 =
5.8
POTASSIUM
0.11
10000 =
11100
0.002 =
2.2
CALCIUM
0.08
10000 = .
800
0.002 -.
1.6
MAGNESIUM
0.30
10000=
3,000
0.002 =
6.0
SODIUM
0.03
10000 =
300
0.002 =
0.6
IRON
10000 =
0.002 =
11 of 25

ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
COPPER
ZINC
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ARSENIC
MERCURY
SELENIUM
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
10000 =
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 12 (4/91)
64,000
0.002 =
128.0
0.002 =
58
0.002 , =
0.12 _
72
0.002 =
0.14
0.5
0.002 =
0.001
:30
0.002 =
0.06
35
0.002 =
0.07
5
0.002 =
0.01
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002
0.002 =
0.002 =
0.002 =
C. CALCULATE SODIl1M ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR)
TOTAL SOLIDS % = 9.53
SAR = Na Milli Equiv. -t- [0.5 (Ca Milli Equiv. + Mg Milli Equiv.)) OS
CONCENTRATION(mg/1) 1 Equivalent Wt. = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 300 (mg/1) 23
CALCIUM (Ca) 800 (mg/1) 20 = —400.0 ___--
MAGNESIUM (Mg) 3,000 (mg/1) y 12 - 250.0
SAR = 1.08
12of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 13 (4/91)
D.PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) CALCULATIONS AND
APPLICATION AREA REQUIREMENTS
TKN
AMMONIA-N
N04-NO3-N
MINERALIZATION RATE
5,200
100
--------------
221
(MR) 30 %
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can
be used for domestic wastewater treatment residuals. If actual values are
established, attach the documentation: The default values are as follows):
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific
default value chosen is appropriate.)
(Complete the following calculations for only the application method proposed)
PAN FOR SURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - Nib) + .Sx(NH3) + NO3/NO2
PAN= 0.30X( 5,200 - 100 ) + Sx 1( 00 ) + 221
PAN = 1801
(PPM DRY WEIGHT)
*All residuals will be surface applied to pasture and hayland
PAN FOR SUBSURFACE APPLICATION
PAN = (MR)x(TKN - NH3) + (NH3) + NO3/NO2
PAN= x( - )+( )+
PAN = (PPM DRY WEIGHT)
13of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 14 (4/9I )
TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR 2.,142 lbs PAN
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED PER YEAR 595+/-
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (mg/kg DRY VL't.) x 2000 POUNDS / TON
PER DRY TON 1,000,000 _
= PAN (PPM DRY WEIGHT) x .002
3.60 POUNDS/TON
TOTAL PAN IN POUNDS = PAN (POUNDSITON) x TOTAL TONS OF
RESIDUAL
3.60 lbs/ton PAN X 595 DT
2,142 POUNDS
DUE TO THE FACT THAT ORGANIC NITROGEN IS MINERALIZED SLOWLY
OVER TIME, THE AMOUNT OF NITROGEN THAT COMES AVAILABLE IN
YEARS FOLLOWING THE INITIAL APPLICATION MUST BE TAKEN INTO
CONSIDERATION WHEN CALCULATING APPLICATION RATES FOR THE
SUBSEQUENT YEARS. THIS BEING THE CASE PLEASE ATTACH AN
EVALUATION OF THIS FACTOR AND ITS IMPACT ON LOADING RATES.
SHOW THE ADJUSTED PAN FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS.
THE MAXIMUM ADJUSTED ANNUAL PAN IS 125 - POUNDS
CROP INFORMATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE PER YEAR
CROP(S) N-UPTAKE OF CROP
LBS/ACRE
Fescue 250 LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
LBS/ACRE
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used:
Accepted Uptake rates taken from the existing permit
14 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 15 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POl1NDS OF AVAILABLE
NITROGEN CALCULATED ABON'L
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = MAX, TOTAL LBS OF AVAILABLE NITROGEN
POUNDS OF NITROGEN NEEDED FOR CROP*
2,142 lbs PAN-250 lbs PAN/Acre*
8.57 ACRES
*Note: All currently permitted sites are in fescue hay or pasture production
THIS VALUE MUST BE THE VALUE FOR THE CROP TO BE GROWN
THAT HAS THE LOWEST NITROGEN UPTAKE RATE PER ACRE
IF THERE ARE VARIOUS CROPS THAT WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR
CERTAIN SITES, PLEASE ATTACH THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
SITE AND DETERMINE THE TOTAL NEEDED ACRES USING THE
FORMAT OUTLINED ABOVE.
E. ANNUAL CADMIUM CALCULATIONS AND APPLICATION AREA
REQUIREMENTS
TAKE CALCULATED POUNDS PER DRY TON FOR CADMIUM FROM B.
ABOVE = 0.001 lbs/ton
TOTAL DRY TONS OF RESIDUAL TO BE LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
595
TOTAL CADMIUM IN POUNDS = CADMIUM (POUNDSI TON) x TOTAL
TONS OF RESIDUAL LAND APPLIED EACH YEAR
0.001 lbs/ton x 595 DT
0.595 POUNDS
MAXIMUM CADMIUM LOADING RATE AS ALLOWED BY 40 CFR
257.3-5 IS 0.5 KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE OR 0.445 POUNDS PER
ACRE
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED TO LAND APPLY THE POUNDS OF TOTAL
CADMIUM CALCULATED ABOVE:
15 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 16 (4/91)
TOTAL ACRES NEEDED = TOTAL P01IINDS OF CADMIUM
0.445 POUNDS PER ACRE PER YEAR
_ 0.595 lbs Cd+0.445 lbs Cd/Ac
1.34 ACRES
F. DETERMINE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES. NEEDED FOR LAND
APPLICATION BY COMPARING THE ACRES NEEDED FOR PAN AND
THAT NEEDED FOR CADMIUM. WHAT IS THE LIMITING FACTOR:
PAN x OR CADMIUM . HOW MANY ACRES ARE NEEDED?
8.57 --h—OW MANY ACRES—N LAND APPLICATION ARE AVAILABLE?
478.8 F THE ACRES AVAILABLE DOES NOT MEET OR EXCEED THE
AURES NEEDED, THE APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED AND
WILL BE RETURNED.
IF CALCULATION SHEETS ARE BEING COMPLETED FOR MORE THAN
ONE RESIDUAL OR SITE, PLEASE ATTACH A SUMMARY SHEET
THAT BRING THE RESULTS OF ALL THE CALCULATION SHEETS TO
ONE POINT.
G. DETERMINE THE SITE LIFE FOR THIS LAND APPLICATION SITE:
NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETERMINATION, THE
LIFETIME HEAVY METAL LOADINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED
THE FOLLOWING FOR THE CORRESPONDING CATION
EXCHANGE CAPACITIES (CEC).
Parameter CEC <
Lead (lbs/acre) 500
Zinc Obs/acre) 250
Copper (lbs/acre) 125
Nickel (lbs/acre) 125
Cadmium (lbs/acre) 4.5
CEC 5-15
CEC > 15
1000
2000
500
1000
250
500
250
500
9
18
SITE LIFE FOR THE SITE COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION THAT HAS
THE LOWEST CEC
THE SITE LIFE IS DETERMINED BY CALCULATING THE NUMBER OF YEARS
THAT THE SITE WITH THE LOWEST CEC CAN RECEIVE THE RESIDUAL WITHOUT
EXCEEDING THE ABOVE LIFETIME METALS LOADINGS. FOR EACH OF THESE
METALS COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS.
16 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 17 (4/91)
1. SITE LIFE BASED ON LEAD
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL = 0.01 lbs /ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr*
POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR =0.01 lbs/ton x 10.0 tons/AC/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETDAE ALLOWABLE LOADTN r BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE = _( 500 lbs/Ac )_ = 5000 YEARS
( 0.1 lbs/Ac/Yr ) *Based on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
Assume all CEC's 4 5 meA/100 g
2. SITE LIFE BASED ON ZINC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF LEAD APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR,
POUNDS PER TON OF ZINC IN RESIDUAL = 0.14 lb s / ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR =0.14 lbs/tonx 10.0 tons/AC/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETRAE ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF ZINC APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 250 lbs/Ac )_
( 1.4 lbs/Ac/Yr )
3. SITE LIFE BASED ON COPPER
118.5 YEARS
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF COPPER IN RESIDUAL = 0.12 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE [YEAR = 0.12 lbs/tin 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF COPPER APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 125 lbs/Ac )_ _ ' 104 YEARS
( 1.2 lbs/Ac/Yr )
17 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 18 (4/91)
4. SITE LIFE BASED ON NICKEL
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RL- SIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF NICKEL IN RESIDUAL = 0.07 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
0
0.07 lbs/ton
POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR = x 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF NICKEL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE•LIFE _ _( 125 lb s /Ac I =
( 0.7 lbs/Ac/Yr )
5. SITE LIFE BASED ON CADMIUM
178.5 YEARS
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = POUNDS
PER TON OF LEAD IN RESIDUAL x TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED
PER ACRE PER YEAR
POUNDS PER TON OF CADMIUM IN RESIDUAL = 0.001 lbs/ton
TONS OF RESIDUAL APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR = 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE /YEAR 0.001 lbs/jon 10.0 tons/Ac/yr
SITE LIFE = LIFETIME ALLOWABLE LOADING BASED ON SITE CEC
PROJECTED POUNDS OF CADMIUM APPLIED PER ACRE PER YEAR
SITE LIFE _ _( 4.5 lb s /Ac )_
( 0.01 lbs/Ac/Yr )
450 YEARS
COMPARE THE FIVE METALS ABOVE AND DETERMINE THE METAL
THAT WILL RESULT IN THE SHORTEST SITE LIFE FOR THIS SITE.
THE METAL IS Copper AND THE SITE LIFE IS 104
YEARS. *Based on worse case of 10.0 tons/Ac/Yr of residual
Assume all CEC' s are 4 5 meq / 100 g
6. Site Life Based on Aluminum
Pounds per ton of Aluminum.in residual = 128.0 lbs/ton
Pounds of aluminum applied per acre per year = 1,280 lbs/Ac/Yr
Site Llfe = 15,000 lbs/Ac* = 11.7 years
1,280 lbs/Ac/Yr
*No current limits on aluminum loadings - 15,000 lbs/Ac chosen as conservative
loadings.
18of25

GARY DUCKWORTH FARM

GARY DUCKWORTH FARM
The Gary Duckworth farm is located in the southeastern corner of Lincoln County approximately 1
mile north of Lowesville, N.C. The proposed fields (seven in total) are located on the east side of State
Route 16 (Latitude 35' 25' 45"; Longitude 810 00' 00"). The surrounding area is predominately rural and is
sparsely populated.
Seven fields, totalling 85.40 acres (68.40 net acres), are proposed as land application sites. All of
the fields support fescue for either hay or grazing pasture for cattle. The fields are in a good state of
management and provide average to above average yields for the crops which are being grown.
The topography over the seven fields ranges from nearly level to gently sloping. Buffer requirements
for setbacks from residences, state roads, and property boundaries will reduce the useable acreage in these
fields, however, the useable acreage should be considered prime for use as a land application site.
The results of the soil analysis for these sites, included with this report, indicate no gross deficiencies
in the fertility of these fields. By using standard agricultural practices for the management of these crops,
the operator should see significant benefits from the application of residual solids. In turn, these well
maintained fields should provide good assimilation of the plant available nutrients contained in the residual
solids and afford an environmentally safe means of solids disposal and nutrient cycling.
A field investigation showed well drained soils dominate the site. The applicable acreage on these
fields consists predominately of the Pacolet and Cecil soil series. This confirms information found in the Soil
Survey of Lincoln County, North Carolina, and also was confirmed by a Soil Scientist employed by S&ME.
Soil series characteristics and profile descriptions are contained in Appendix II of this report.

MAIDEN
INcol B o. o
C O U N
T
!
o
CA7AOWZ CD. zs7.
Y
:
0�
-
IDW G
iyl
1417
--\
.
LJ.
IA7 'A , , 1167
!17.
;i
^
'9
136.
1316
.
13
I). '(9
., P.4 ;?
67 .�
1169• \.�
' 13.3
I l.]
, .1 �S , \.1
1319
1003
' 31
.p 13.
1743 1 66
C
.0 7e9 ,J 13.1
1 \t L9
L,70
0 �
Ilse
Cmek
6 73
a? 1 0>
1 1001 -� O�� I3U 1717 I311 �/,�
O Uo N T Y �o
..ROJECT
Mt. Holly Land Application
Gary Duckworth Farm
1763
Iy�1 - f4T YI 77
A1adlpeloh ,
L +�
/ I 113
1 't 1/
GARY DUCKWORTH FARM
a
7 102
735 ?� 2,14151
.� 34 Mnrip\nso 7 e J
S • (3799 9 1.3p
I 0
FAP _
O �J
W r -
vw3
1
c / 1—
h.p ole % 2
1�
I6] O,I- O
V
I �
S
li V FAS
� F
~ co� v �
• 30
z
107e 15.1 \ 000$nM
/5
163, 1653 1/ 1379 i 73
1 j791 I n 1397 a —I
33-73'
less r
eye + V
� W
v_
0
R
SCALE: 1"=2 miles
J08 MO: 1584-92-005
FIG. NO: Location Mai

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 19 (4/91)
rurtj Carolina DiWgioti of
(ttWrownetttzY Ma 4tagemtttt
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: S&ME, Inc.
Contact Person: Mr. G. F. "Rick" Baker P. G. Greensboro S&ME Branch Mgr. [phone]
Address of Permittee
115-C Montlieu Drive: Greensboro, N.C. 27419
List of Sludges or residuals to be applied to these lands:
City of Mount Holly WWTP - Permit# WQ0001863
Site ID Number: Gary Duckworth Farm
Field Number. GD-1 thru GD-7
Location of Land to be used for sludge or residual application (include map for each site):
See attached map
Owner of Property used for sludge or residual application: Gary Duckworth
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): N/A
Land use or cropping in patterns: Hay and Pasture Production
Intended use or disposition of crops: Livestock Feed
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl1111I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111Illlll111lllllllllltlllllllllllllllllll
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
S&ME, Inc.
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed sludges or residuals upon the land
at the location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as
given below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the
nutrient value of the applied sludge or residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the
use of the land described above for the disposal of digested sludge or residuals. This agreement
shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
pemut and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned
land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions
and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies
or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
19of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 20 (4/91)
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687.
111111111111111111 11 111 till llllllllllllllll llllllllll l llllllllllllllllllllll 111 11 11 l 11 llllilllllillll llllllllillllll
STIPULATIONS:
L. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and
State Officials or their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to,
during, and after sludge or residual application and to established monitoring
facilities on or near the application site as required by the sludge or residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State
Officials or their representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water
samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of sludge or residual
application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will delineate maximum application rates,
limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and
data concerning the program for land application of sludge or residuals to privately
owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the sludge, sludge
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee for sludge or residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge or
residual application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5
provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
sludge/residual and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or
modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each
planting season to enable the Pemmittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine
sludge/residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period of
eighteen (18) months following sludge application.
2( if 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent
sludge application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the_ eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Permittee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The ,existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall JDA-11given `by ;the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details o �t�r6.rpaterials applied or
incorporated at each site.-
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of -,the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation: of cr6ddntials,.2 enigr and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related M the applicatibn site and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determi$utg-.cdtnpliance with this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept•ainder ;tie terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
18. Owner/Operator agrees NOT to enter into any other land application
program agreements without giving prior notice to the permitee.
Illllllltlllllillllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllilillllllllllitlllll1111111111111111111111111111111111
..RESTRICTIONS:
LAND OWNER: QkV OqCeWo"
ADDRESS: 95
1 7ANL_Ey ,K.c,
PHONE # : (704) R, '7 - g2o 5
OPERATOR: A11A
ADDRESS:
PHONE #:
21 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
lllllllllillllllllltllllllllllllll11lllllilllllllllllllllllll1111I11111111III11111111111t111111111111111111111111111
read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission to the
Permirtek to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specifie�hin.
fj
Land Owner
/2�0�g2
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, Ulan COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that (!"1 /GeE- ,/%uC,-W,14-77l
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this 16 zrA day of Jan�� 19,70
NOT4R1 laI.IC U
Q. W 1LI-C %00,
es 5 f 7 /-2 7
cc: NOTAFty
: —*
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
I, r, I . have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby ag- -- to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Penrtittee
T Date
22 of 25

`I+ _ _ _ �j . i "' �•j Marina
,, ; Q . y _ \lI �� '• _�� '. l 1 'Campsite—
793
• �_ , ' - / ',
��'`/ _ r J� � �`�, �._ •� ! ___—` ,�, \\ � \```i�' Ili• � � )I' '1\ i\.` / �.j
so
37
41
815
�.J + ' it r 'I i �\ // f`� r ��,/� �` ,..-'/ . �- ``/. �--�� i'�� -. •����'
r 1
�� r � : �r r�! '� �i' �``\ � 1 ill i •�' `��✓ ,I (L� � \�
ir
FIELD GD-3 11 FIELD GD-2
IOU
FIELD GD-5
FIELD GD-1
tr
—
'�; FIELD`GD-4
;FIELD GD-
.� 1 C c�iockHil
/ /Il •x' -/-�_ 1511 a- f,-�._ ~_- • `. ��'�f' ' • r �i ---. Ir J ��
Bti 785
750
7r,
PROJECT SCALE: 1"=2000r
Mt. Holly Land Application eo JOB NO: 1584-92-005
Gary Duckworth Farm $ >
F16• NO: Fields 5 6
Lowesville, and Lake Norman South, N.C. Quads. (7.5 Min.)

X!
4f
t FIELDAD-3
QSL
0
FIELD GD-51
P
Aw-
16F Z Jr. rf
ob
A )'...
.3
% D-2
.FIELD GD-1
FIELD GD-
W FIELD GD
N_
-r3oq1 -4
FIELD GD-6 A
A
_W!
CA
IOU
WEL,
v Pi -
rROJECT S C ALE: 1"=660' (approx.)
Mt. Holly Land Application eo JOB NO: 1584-92-005
Gary Duckworth Farm
FIG. NO: ASCS Mapping

School y _ ' . _ a U4 j� - ' I GnBe' .\ GnB2 1
' - PAC '1t : P�•' - � p �c � f aD ti'fi:, _ J - � -
CcB. CeB2 0 Ud v ... :'•'"-'- -: .,.a° l � -\ 1 t. � ,•
,: ' ,PaC Q J 'Aim='� .' { -' ,¢ '�_-:'•`[. v� _ � -
� �' ' -� '0 . p.;•L�cB - _drr..�; U' 6� IA,Y. .1 � ��' ,AGri9`.; _ _;'' ^ �_::: � •�,. � 1
G
47,
TAU-
Wn
�r � �-tJ.d6� `�CcB: _ 4 . �hA � � � _ - c.� �• vim.- �
A'C--
:�� Cfi Ce82
~E{ \Y 1ddC2 ..{t�• Pew 3 r?� ZxC r:^, r
_Md62 ('N•dC2 �t MdB2.'Cc
1`
MdC2 / �� CeB2
MaD I _ °CeB2• � ' _ 'f£.•--.�. • e � � ,
Pel; : PeB2
t2 PeC2PeC2 �Y t
Ud PeB2
Pete,
FIELD GD-2 4r�'.* Pa7:-.� t �;•.
FIELDGD—
.
2
:.� :f�' = 4 a✓ b C Ce92: �� • a
F FIELD GD-5
ry 6� B2:ktys �d PeB't .y IELD GD-1
J PeB2 IPeC2 ' �°�'� ' ,n' , n ;: �• r= a :fir
qP '� _CeB2
FIELD GD�6 -FIE D GD-4
PeB2
FIELD GnB
^`,--�
z
r , : ' tt�t.ct:
tBZ ZwG /PeC2 Q" _ �t': CeB2 1397! CeB2
•.., � � z
� -r.•. _ -.CeB2
WnB
��' - CeB2 r-Cl°�""�1•`-:� 1 � fr 7T" -r !^'R I J
�`
FP` w i .8 GnB2
Pei iC' s• •W _ :r_a 3':.✓c. ' 1 it C"aC�
He8
S
nC2 cam, GnGn8
B2 1 i. 2
V L.. (g 1 1 7wCIV
��� Vim' •q \\ r
n82 _T- le i t CeB2 y0 Wai
CIB
CeB 2
-rr a e C
GIC2
eG PeC2 `� y ��/ V
CeB PaD CtB .rat iy 2aaD
=hnB
P R O J E C T S C ALE: 1"=20001
Mt. Holly Land Application e 0 JOB NO: 1584-92-005
Gary Duckworth Farm
F16, NO;SCS Soil Mapping
Lincoln County, N.C. Soil Survey- Sheets Number 7&8

1 ::
\ FIELD GD-3
FIELD GD-5
rim 1 51�_ _.I
FIELD'GD-6
FIELD GDA
FIELD GD-2
FIELD GD-1
FIELD GD-7
Legend
❑
Abandoned house
//// Buffer
®
Church
®
House
— — —
Property line
w
Well
R O J E C i SCALE: 1"=660' (approx. )
1584-92-005
t M. Holly Land Application nI *SM Jo® NO:Gary Duckworth Farm
FIG. N®e Buf f er Map

FIELD DATA SHEET
GARY DUCKWORTH FARM
FIELD
NUMBER
GROSS
ACRES
RET
ACRES
CROP
SOIL SERIES
APPLICATION
PERIOD
GD-1
22.3
- 21.1
Fescue
Cecil 2-8%
Pacolet 8-15%
Year Long
GD-2
14.1
11.6
Fescue
Cecil 2-8%
Pacolet 8-15%
Year Long
GD-3
4.0
3.1
Fescue
Gaston 2-8%
Year Long
GD-4
7.1
6.2
Fescue
Pacolet 2-8%
Pacolet 8-15%
Year Long
GD-5
28.7
20.4 __------
Fescue
Cecil 2-8%
Pacolet 2-8%
Year Long
GD-6
5.4
2.2
Fescue
Pacolet 2-8%
Year Long
GD-7
3.8
3.8
Fescue
I Cecil 2-8%
I Year Lon
TOTAL
85.4
68.4
1 -
29—Dec-92

REPORT NUMBER A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R357-176 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] D
Fax No. [phone]
(i
ACCT # 45593 0
1 ' ' .'• SAMPLES
SEND �t SUBMITTED
TO: SBME (MOUNT HOLLY) 1 ��� 1a�EHI'' )PON 001629 BV; BETH SWING
ATTN: RICK BAKER �ry'� �GARY DUCKWORTH
P o BOX 18169 � � i I
GREENSBORO NC 27419__�____________
)ATE OF REPORT 12/22/92 PAGE ISOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
I
SAMPLE
LAB
NUMIIEH
ORGANIC
MATTER
% ••
PIIIISPMURUS
1 Pp -----
(Weak Bray! N,HCOy y
POTASSIUM
--"K -
MAGNESIUM
--Mu
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
"
HYDRO.
GEN
H
Cation
( IElfcha e
Capacity
C.E.C.
PERCENT
BASE SATURATION [COMPUTED)
% X % ! X '6
Ca
Na
SOIL
DUFFER
NUMBER
ENR
RATE Ibs./A
pp•l• p RATE '•
pPmp HATE
••:.•
Ppa• N RATE
.:•
pynrMp HATE
•••
ppahCa BATE
.%
ppm•Na gATF
pH
pH
meq/1000
IllaQ/100p
K Mp CA Na
6D-1
1342
2.8 107H
9 L
11 - V1.
57 M
107 Vii
390 M
30 VL
6.0
6.9:
0.6
3.7
4.0
24.3
53.2
15.0
3.6
6D-2
1343
3.1.113H
17 L
22-L
.55 M
85 V-
390 M
32 V
.5.7
6.9
0.8
3.7
3.8
19.0
52.4
21.0
3.7
6D-3
13431
3.1 103H
16 L
22 L
142 VN
152 V1
480 M
30 VL
6.2
.6.9
0.6
4.7
7.7
26.8
50.8
12.0
2.8
bD-4
1343
.3.7 115H
7 Y
• 12 L
.87 M
175 V
.530 M
29 VL
6.3
6.9
0.5
5.0
4.5
29.3
53.2
10.5
2.5
6D-5
1343
:4.4 129V
17 L
26 M
103 H
167 V
470 L
34 VL
6.0
6.9
0.7
4.9
5.4
28.5
48.1
15.0
3.0
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
MANGA•
SOLUBLE
MOLYB•
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC
NESE
IRON
COPPER
BORON
EXCESS
SALTS
CHLORIDE
DENUM
LIME
%
%
%
SOIL
NUMBER
M03
S
ZR
Mu
Fe
Cu
B
RATE
CI
Mo
TEXTURE
pym-NO3 Is HAVE
ppm3 RATE
ppeiln RATE
ppm MII RATE
ppm -f. RATE
ppnt•Cu HATE
pput•I RATE
mahq/am RATE
ppm•CI RATE
ppwMo RATE
SAND
SILT
CLAY
6D-1
.1.3L
16M
1.7H
601-2
-1.2L
10M
1.6H
6D-3
:2.7 M
26 H
3.8 VH
This report applies only to the samplem tested. Samples are retained
a maximum of thirty days alter testlna.
6 D-4
2.4 M
.23 H
2.1 H
A 6 L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
6D-5
2.0 L
13 M
0.8 M
C NORMAN BONES
BY
• LULL I U, (rAI IIV Cis: VERY LOW IVL). L; nY.1 l_). MI-UIUM 11.1). - 111II pl). VLI4Y HIl3r,,(V I)j. ANU NUNL• (N). .•.. MULTIPLY THE HESU LTS IN ppm BV 4.6 TU CUNV ERT TO LBS. PER ACRE P205 I (/
•• LNR - EST IMA7ED NITkOGLN RLLEASL yy ••••• MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20
••• MULTIPLY T HE RLSULI S IN PPrn BY 2 10 CUNVI. R I TO L11". PLR ACRE OF THE kEMEN7AL FORM MUST SOILS WEIUH TWO (2) MILLION POUNDS (DRY WEIGHT) FOR AN ACRE OF SOIL 6.2/3 INCHES DEEP.

Y
REPORT NUMBER
R357-176
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
SEND
TO: SAKE CMOUNT HOLLY)
ATTN: RICK B AK EF
P 0 BOX 18169
GREENSBORO NC 27419
DATE OF REPORT 71 2;19 2 PAGE 1
GROWER: PO# 001629
GARY DUCKWORTH
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY:
( 13 L
Ego
ACCT # 45593
BETH SWING
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potas-
Sulfur
Calcium
Mag-
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manga-
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
(DENT.
NO.
%N
Phorus
%P
slum
%K
%S
%C
neslun
%Mg
Na
ppm
ppm Fe
ppm AI.
nese
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm Znf
ppm
ppm
s0-1
-13429
GO-2
13430
GD-3
13431
GD-4
13432
GD-5
13433
LAB
Cadmium
Chro-
mlum
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Nitrogen
pH
Total
C.E.C.
NO.
ppm Cd
ppm Cr
ppm NI
ppm Pb
ppm As
ppm Hg
ppm Se
%
(meg/100g)
13429
< 0.1
< 1
2
K E 11
L I
H E
X T R
A C T
I 0 N
13430
< 0.1
1
2
13431
< 0.1
< 1
1
13432
< 0.1
c 1
1
13433
< 001
< 1
2
Values on this
report ar
the total
mount of
the sampl
ppm =
mg/kg °/
= 10,000
mg/kg
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confiedntial use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made This report a plies oni to the samppl , M to •ted. Samples are
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. retained a ximum 1KyailD ng.
A& L I U T L R IES, INC.
Ru

J
REPORT NUMBER A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R357-173 7621 Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] Q
Fax No. [phone]
ACCT 8 45593
.r a.l' 1 ✓
f, SAMPLES
SEND `\lU` SUBMITTED BETH SWING
TO: S&ME . (MOUNT HOLLY) h ti�Hi �►: �04)B 001629 BY:
ATTN: RICK BAKER ���+ .Aqa# 1584-92-005
P 0 BOX 18169 DUCKWORTH
6REEMSBORO NC 27419 t v
DATE OF REPORT 12/22/92 PAGE: 1 SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT ( I
LAB
ORGANIC
MATTER
PHUSrNURbS
___ ._.. _......__ .__.__
P1 I'1
POTASSIUM
MAGNESIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
�._-_
pH
I
HYDROti
GEN
Cation
Ex0a n
Capacity%NUMBER
PERCENT'
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
__.r._�
K
..-...,—_—.
Mg
CA
Na
SOIL
SUFFER
SAMPLE
% ••
ENR
(Work Buy) Nr11CO-I P
-
•••••
•••
•:•
•••
H
C.E.C.
K I % X %
K MI G H No
NUMBER
RATE Ib/./A
pInPRAIE p IYRAIE
plmrKHATE
ppm ME HATE
ppm•CaHATE
ppwNIIRATE
pH
H
mxq/100p
losq/1009
'
iD-6
1341
3.0 101M
'24 M
33 M
71 M
177 VP
540 M
34 VL
6.8
0.1.
4.6
3.9
31.8
58.1
3.0
3.2
GD-7
1342C
2.9 109H
15 L
30 M
85 H
128 Vi
420 M
30.VL
6.5
7.0
0.3
3.8
5.7
28.1
55.3
7.5
3.4
I%UF InXPLANAI ION UN IdAI:RI
MANGA-
SOLUBLE
MOLYB-
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
X
SANG
%
SILT
%
CLAY
SOIL
TEXTURE
SAMPLE
NUMBER
NITRATE
Nt'j
ppm N0j N RAIE
SULFUR
S
ppm S HATE
ZINC
ZR
ppm•le HAIE
NESE
Mn
ppmEln HAZE
IRON
FF
ppm-Fa HATE
COPPER
Cu
pMCu RATE
BORON
D
ppm-11 RATE
EXCESS
LIME
RATE
SALTS
mmhodom HATE
CHLORIDE
CI
ppm•CI RATE
DENUM
Mo
pprwuo RATE
60-6
.2.0 L
22 H
1.3 H
60-7
A.9L
1914
2.0.H
This report applies only to the sarllple(s) tested. Samples are retalned
a maximum of thirty days alter listing.
•
A 6 S AGRICULTUR AT ES, NC.
v
. NORMAN.JO S
BY
C tll )E. TO RA ING; VERY LOW (Vl.), I (,W (l.l, MLUIUM (,.I), HIGH (II), VLHY III UH (VHI. --1 n V— trvl. •••• MULI H'LY Inc nc-- I" ppm 01 1.0 Iv a.vl�vcn � — cw.11......,.E 11-1
.. .Nu FtiT IMAT FfI NIT H(1GFN H41 LASL ••••• MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN ppm BY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20

REPORT NUMBER
R357-173
SEND
TO:
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
S&ME (MOUNT HOLLY)
ATTN: RICK BAKED
P 0 BOX 18169
GREEAS80A0 NC 27419
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
GROWER: PO# 001629 BY:
JOB# 1584-92-005
GARY DUCKWORTH
ACCT # 45593
13cTH SWING
DATE OF REPORT 1 2/ 23 /92 PAGE 1 SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT i
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potas-
Sulfur
Calcium
Mag-
Sodium
Na
Iron
'
Aluminum
Manga-
Hasa
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
IDENT.
NO.
/oN
phorus
%P
slum
%K
a
/aS
,
/oC
neslum
%M9
ppm
ppm Fe
ppm At,
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm Zni
PPm
PPm
GD-6
'13419
GD-7
13420
LAB
Cadmium
Chro-
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Nitrogen
pH
Total
C.E.C.
NO.
ppm Cd
mium
ppm Cr
PP m Ni
PP m Pb
PP m As
m H
PP 9
PP m Se
%
(meg/100g)
13419
< 0-1
< 1
3
M E 11
L I I
H E
X T R A C T I 0 h
13420
< C-1
< 1
2
Values on this
report or
the total
mount of
the sampl
. ppm =
mg/kg 0
= 10,000
mg/kg
This report aRRpiles Samples are
ti�flkrdiys�F
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confiedntial use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
retalne mlxan I ng.
A & L E UR R TO IES, INC.
By-- ---- - -- ---- -- - ---- -

TONY JONES FARM

TONY JONES FARM
The Tony Jones farm is located in the southern section of Lincoln County and extends into north
Gaston County. The farm is located approximately 2 miles southwest of Lowesville, N.C. The proposed
fields (seven in total) are located on the east and west sides of S.R. 1398 (Latitude 35' 24' 35"; Longitude
810 02' 15"). The surrounding area is predominately rural and is sparsely populated.
Seven fields, totalling 15020 acres (123.80 net acres), are proposed as land application sites. The
fields support fescue for either' hay or grazing pasture for cattle. The fields are in a good state of
management and provide average to above average yields for the crops which are being grown.
The topography over the seven fields ranges from nearly level to gently sloping. Buffer requirements
for setbacks from residences, ponds, secondary roads, property boundaries, and areas with greater than
10% slope reduce the useable acreage in these fields, however, the useable acreage should be considered
prime for use as a land application site.
The results of the soil analysis for these sites, included with this report, indicate no gross deficiencies
in the fertility of these fields. By using standard agricultural practices for the management of these crops,
the operator should see significant benefits from the application of residual solids. In turn, these well
maintained fields should provide good assimilation of the plant available nutrients contained in the residual
solids and afford an environmentally safe means of solids disposal and nutrient cycling.
A field investigation showed well drained soils dominate the site. The applicable acreage on these
fields predominantly consists of the Cecil soil series. The southern portion of field TJ-4 (within Gaston
County) is described by the Soil Conservation Service as being the Chewacla soil series. Field
investigations, however, showed this area to consist of the Congaree soil series which is a moderately well
drained to well drained soil, and therefore suitable for year long application. All other soil descriptions are
confirmed in the Soil Survey of Lincoln County, North Carolina, and the Soil Survey of Gaston County, North
Carolina and were also confirmed by a Soil Scientist employed by S&ME. Soil series characteristics and
profile descriptions are contained in Appendix 11 of this report.

0 C O U N T Y
1574
A 16
-03
A I372?
* B 1131e
13. 13A7 `1 ` 41 V 1371
1].D
1369 .31]70 uw r Belbel I373 .g 1 O
] V� •� 6.M id ' 13a9 1 60 1J1 S 1771 13 Ii•' _"I
Punpkil Cwn -
u 1 1 I.sy .a ' 7 ` 1373
I50 tom. 134t b1364
.a 17u M1 T A .:� a IGd.RM ./ .1
1639 1763
1334 J :oi
1362 ld 13&
LiAiol�Co 1� tlls v flappv B C2J' N 1
Q
1356 1.5 ti ,
_ry / F—
t36o .� Trianpb / % I Z
S t
IS" INS 17�7
14
417
1357
1 'I fqT Y 73 J
Bract '
131. 1702
^
// 1-0. 7
IROH t�.2' \ I.e �. �b C•1Be4 1]ae • P�5
STATI 1 E 1 M5 130
16DI 9 ! F0 13sa 1511
v
� %s.• 1 � TO y
ia
]61 .� 3.] c0b ews `
J � I C 1Se1 ..6 .1 _. 16761
/
C �f 1 J y 1710 1.' y
7J
GG/
qe e16s3IA12
Ins 3_ 3 1312 ,311 . ,\
aripo,a
p 1391398 1..Jn _ 1. 6511716 r:
�.:
o;s 17a7 . TONY JONES�FARMuj
�
•ui2— nv_6 T
_
1
0 1
o N T Y c1_
PROJECT SCALE: 1"=2 miles
Mt. Holly Land Application
J06 N0:1584-92-005
Tony Jones Farm FIG. NO: Location Map_

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 19 (4/91)
or j (�atroY t at D iWsim of
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: S&ME, Inc.
Contact Person: Mr. G F "Rick" Baker P G Greensboro S&ME Branch Mgr. [phone]
Address of Permittee: 135-C Montlieu Drive; Greensboro, N.C. 27419
List of Sludges or residuals to be applied to these lands:
City of Mount Holly WWTP - Permit# WQ0001863
Site ID Number: Tony Jones Farm
Field Number: TJ-1 thru TJ-7
Location of Land to be used for sludge or residual application (include map for each site):
See attached map
Owner of Property used for sludge or residual application
North Jones
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): N/A
Land use or cropping patterns: Hay and Pasture Production
Intended use or disposition of crops:
Livestock Feed
1111111111111111111111111111Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilll
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
S&ME, Inc.
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to .apply the above listed sludges or residuals upon the land
at the location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as
given below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the
nutrient value of the applied sludge or residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the
use of the land described above for the disposal of digested sludge or residuals. This agreement
shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned
land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions
and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies
orcancels this Land owner's A greement .
19of25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 20 (4/91)
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division -of Environmental Management
-Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 2761.1-7687
iilllillllllllll ltlllllli!l111111111111111111111111111Iliilillllllllllllllllllll III111111111111111111111111111111111
STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and
State Officials or their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to,
during, and after sludge or residual application and to established monitoring
facilities on or near Die application site as required by the sludge or residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State
Officials or their representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water
samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months -after termination of, this
Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of sludge or residual
application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will delineate maximum application rates,
limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and
data concerning the program for land application of sludge or residuals to privately
owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the sludge, sludge
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee for sludge or residual application.
5. The Perminee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge or
residual application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5
provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
sludge/residual and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or
modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each
planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine
sludge/residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period of
eighteen (18) months following sludge application.
2� )f 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period of eighteen (18) months: from the date of the most recent
sludge application. -
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Permittee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party,- the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies`with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13.7he existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall given by the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of the materials applied or
incorporated at each site. -
a " - YFI;,r
a -
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative -ef-:-the Divi!6on of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation= of '-cradetitfals,' eninr and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related li' the. applicatioh i te and
facility at any rplian
easonable time for the purpose of detetmibing comcewith this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept=:ender,-.the terms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
18. Owner/Operator agrees NOT to enter into any other land application
program agreements without giving prior notice to the permitee.
111111I 111111111111111111111111111111111111III11III11l1I11111111111111111111l111111111111111111l11l11111111111111111
RESTRICTIONS:
LAND OWNER: AloRTH JWE5 OPERATOR: TONS i0klE5
ADDRESS: ADDRESS:
PHONE #:
PHONE # : 704) 4,93- /600
21 of 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
111I1111111111111111111I11111111111111111111111 l l l l l l I I I1111I11111111I l 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I. MoRTN4 .TONES have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant permission to the
!:ZPermtttee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
/2Z6 l92-
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, -/1a COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that /(/oRTN76AfE5
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and'official seal this /� �P day of earn� I ,19 92
P
NOTAtQV 1MJ3j.IC
�migst q Nes 527 /9'7
NOTARY '; 9
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
I. C). F 'RA KEe have read this land owner s agreement and do hereby ag- . to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Pemuttee
Date
22 of 25

I
7,
�_ I'' /r_/ �,/�1'•' `\, I ,\ it _ q �
IV
l ✓ ` / I,J \ — ,\ �. 1C —Rock Hill. II s 0
57
.� � 1 "� I` I . / r �— J ` I �• _ `1Y
.17 Bt{ 735
;�r '°\ , g •�-, ,% \ i "i� :ice \:J' � `-� `� _. _- ' / / ` 'co,
•`A.I ';; j 'FIELD TJ-FIELD TJ-7 --
� ����� �\ I i :;,•� � � � `7ez '�,�-''' �/ - ,tom' �r� �� c —" \l� �'~'- e
FIELD TJ-1
FIELD TJ-5
14 1/FIELD TJ-2 i FIELD T 4`l
! �, lU\\_- .. / / / \�/'' ! `' � . �-� •'. `'�_ l • _ � • . `fir- \-=, i i \ ` �" `r/ �� •v,
J ,/' i/ ���' IELD TJ_3CO
907
If
Zf
'� -F,
j,j,\ % /� ` �j / 1' l �s ( i _J G= =_Castaneh
IQ
�� "'•I ,1r7 \ i is t i l -ya4h.
67
2a
PROJECT SCALE: 1 "=2000'
t. Holly Land Application JOB NO: 1584-92-005
Tony Jones Farm 1,2,3,
F16, W Fields 4,5,6.7
Lowesville, N.C. Quad. (7.5 Min.)

CrtC2 -�j GnB2 : `- -• ✓ U U
M2
{ GnB2 PeB2
r1eB2 r'
f� PeC2
ChA' PeB2 ,��� -CeB2
PQ ?• O G°G'Ce89. ?• PeC�.'S F Ce82 rB2 ` PeB2c�
CeBZ
�,.. � `�• •PeC2- � ,r m _ ���"... P/162 ,^^t_ - I
CeB2 c'4
Pp�2 I GnB2 .r �GItC� �Cz •...',^.�.� •6`AB2 �P.eC2 ZwC '' � f l
PaC,: �•, ;� ! CeB2 1
Ce82 nEl
4.. ,
F - h c ;4 ,' �. hA c. , L'owasville
FIELD TJ-6-. �IELD TJ-7 >• r
r . Pe'82 �.
• • : .' *CeB2 � r �.. P 2 - . %, :b He�•� . .'1
PeC
r� 2 to
Gn8 =FIELD�TJ—i. t3a•t Gn8
E GnC2FILD — eB2 •_� ,.�
�T TJ 5 r „ PeC2
PeC2 e
9 ''� FIELD TJ—.. FIELD TJ-4"PeC2• ^' > , �� U.
1 .mat•..
LTNCO
Par e� t �• R . T. COUNTY
Buy
FIELD TJ-3 GASTON COUNTY 1}2
,•vH CeB2 13 '_ A. A' _ _ - � MaB2�� Y:�_ '' ' Nd a :�
Co .!Y p• .� '` Wlid _ ��`:a :, zCo b * Ge82' Ge0 0 4ti. •fiCeEy
�.
PaD2 t. A
CH ' �E' ,ti✓_, . - y'x _ ,_l fir t7 . Q eE .. .
K ` .CH' • s. 4 >� �� 01 j ~• y/ . CH^.'�c'. Q �'I , li B v iA ceb2j
4'r a 1 co Y. 2
yDI�:CI
' .�. �.•� 6r92; ' +C�t Lp �,Q r Cti •••:.. eE '„ �'
APB
_ 'u ..+ �,r.L Vt ' "tr;.ei:.'#: ,'„ .�� PAS "D Ge ..� J CeB•
ta20 �.r ;.•ti .�ff:,y�-_: .a. .wJ•+JP L ._y' Q'O.. a.
r MaB2 4 + I
.`:•�•C6D S! .I'� ,i• re•ria\ .F+fr,�s Gen.+r, j ,
CD 2
WK v!'1
.'ROJECT
t. o ly Land Application
Tony Jones Farm
�
`•
w•• .: Pam.
'� ro q
-PAD
-
Q
• r Peb •
•
PA f
PdDk ,
• 1Lu'ft
. �
,
r D
* i 0
CdB�•
V 4
W-
C
''vt�l:.`t4+/! \\ '�•:y: :aka; t's_.. Ce92 > /1P8 .
S C ALE: 111=9nnn t uppro
J0e NO: 1584-92-005
FIGS. NO : SCS Soil Magpi n
Soil Survey of Gaston County, N.C.- Sheet Number 1
Soil Survey of Lincoln County, N.C.- Sheet Number 7 (Unpublished)

IS96
rF3
FIELD TJ-1
rROJECT
Mt. Holly Land Application
Tony Jones Farm
a
1
1
FIELD TJ-7
I
FIELD TJ-S
r
I
FIELD TJ-4
i
I
\ / Legend
f ❑ Barn
\ 1 ////Buffer j
>10% slope
\ I House
p Pond
\I - --Property Line
SCALE: 1"=660' (approx.)
J®® NO. 1584-92-005
F1 G. NO: Buffer Map

FIELD DATA SHEET
TONY JONES FARM
FIELD
NUMBER
GROSS
ACRES
NET
ACRES
CROP
SOIL SERIES
APPLICATION
PERIOD
TJ-1
8.6
6.6
Coastal Bermuda
Cecil 2-8%
Year Long
TJ-2
21.0
16.0
Coastal Bermuda
Cecil 2-8%
Year Long
TJ-3
9.6
9.6
Coastal Bermuda
Cecil 2-8%
Year Long
TJ-4
32.0
25.0
_--
Coastal Bermuda
Cecil 2-8%
Congaree (in field)
Chewacla (SCS)
Pacolet 8-15%
Year Long
TJ-5
10.0
8.6
Coastal Bermuda
Cecil 2-8%
Year Long
TJ-6
54.0
45.0
Coastal Bermuda
Cecil 2-8%
Year Long
TJ-7
15.0
13.0
Coastal Bermuda
Cecil 2-8%
Year Long
TOTAL
150.2
123.8
19—Jan-93

REPORT NUMBER
R357-175
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND ,�..!'_
To: SI�ME (MOUNT HOLLY) 1� - (;HUWEH )F,03 001629
ATTN: RICK BAKER • a II+01080 1584-92-005
P 0 80X 18169 �" �' `� �.oJZ�� NY .JONES
GREENSBORO NC 27419 r
DATE OF REPORT 12%22/92 PAGE 1 SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
O
ACCT 0 45593
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY: BETH SITING
ORGANIC
MATTER
PllusPHURUS
-' -'-' -"- --
PprASSIUM
-'
MAGNLSIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
PH
HYOROI•
Cation
Ext,Nanpa
PERCENT
BASE SATURATIONICOMPUTEO)
-
N
-
Mg
Ca
Na
SOIL
BUFFER
SAMPLE
LAB
NUMBER,
% ••
Pl Pp
Malik U.a) fv ttt:o•..,,
Y a t
GEN '
Capacity
%
%
-
S:.
%
-
%
NUMBER
ENR
RATE Iba/A
peel PHAIE ���
op. RAIk
�•
ppnrK HATE
•••
ppm MI HATE
•••
ppnr Ca RATE
�••
pplo-Na HATE
PH
pR
H
nttq/I(Wp
C.E.C.
IReq/IU0g
K
Mp
Ca
H
Na
TTJ1
1342
2.2 ' 95M
6 VL
10 V
72 H
SOT Vt
340 M
33 L
6.1
6.9
0.5
3.4
5.4
26.3
50.1
14.0
4.2
TJ-2
1342
2.9 99M
2 VL
5'V
86 H
130 Vt
450 M
29-VL
6.3
6.9
0.4
4.1
5.4
26.3'54.7
10.5
3.1
TJ-3
1342
2.6 97M
3 VL
5 V
74 M
133 V
440 M
37 L
6.1..6.9
0.6.
4.3
4.5
6.1
51.7
4.0
3.8
TJ-4
1342
2.2' 95M
5 VL
8 Vt.
65 M
73 V
320 M
25 VL
5:9
,6.9
.0.5
3.0
5.6
20.3
53.5
17,0
3.6
TJ-5
1342
.3.7 125VN
5 WL
8 Vt.
.89 H
89 V
'360 L
33-VL
5.5
6.8
1.0
3.9
5.8
8.8
45.7
26.0
3.6
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
MANGA•
SOLUBLE
MOLYB-
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC
NESE
IRON
COPPER
BORON
EXCESS
SALTS
CHLORIDE
DENUM
NUMBER
HOB
S
Zu
Mu
Fa
Cu
B
LIME
RATE
CI
Mo
%
%
%
SOIL
pill. NH3 N HATE
ppa•3 HATE
ppm•hI RATE
ppmMn HATE
ppm-Fe RATE
Ppm-Cu RATE
ppm-11 RAIE
mm)lor/cu RATE
ppm•CI RATE
PpmMo HATE
SAND
SILT
CLAY
TEXTURE
TTJ1
- 0.6 VL
12 M
1.1 M
7J-2
A.6 L
13 M
1.4 H
TJ-3
: 1.0 • V
:18 M
1.3 H
This report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retaineu
•
a maximum of thirty days alter teYllna,
7J-4
.1.2 L
11 M
0.9 M
A 3 L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
TJ-5
:1.5 L
23 H
1.3 H
C. NORMAN
-- -
------ -
---
---
-_._.
By
- Z710-2
...,,,� ,......,,,.....•..... �..... t•.. ,, , • . „ i, ,., �„v.+ I . ,, n,.. t. v, �cn. ,n,.n Iv,l, .,rvu Iwl�c llv 1. .... MULf.PLY THE HLSULTS IN PPm HY 4.b TO CONVERT TO LBS. PER ACRE P205 v
•• !NH • ESTIMAT LU NIT HOi;try HtLt ASL . .. MULTIPLY TItE RESULTS SU LT$ IN ppnr tlY 2.4 TO CONVERT TO LtlS. PER ACRE KZO V
••• MtILI Ipt Y rliE HLSLIL_rS IN Sun, By 2 1,1 c, Il��il ,l I I„ N pl p NI lrf r.F I •.. , , , •, ,. �. I.], Ft,uAn MI'1ST G, ,,, G wl ,(:,-1 TWt. ,�, An„ , „ln, u.i„n, r, r. ,,.ov w� �r_uT. cno nu nroc nc cn„ . . -ur. 1-Lu

REPORT NUMBER A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R357-175
SEND
TO: SAME (MOUNT HOLLY)
ATT N: RICK BAKER
P 0 EOX 18169
GREENSBORO NC 27419
DATE OF REPORT 1 212-119 2 PAGE I
GROWER: P03 001629
JOB# 1584-92-005
TONY JONES
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY:
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
phorus
Potas-
slum
Sulfur
Calcium
Mag-
neslum
Sodium
Na
Iron
Aluminum
Mange-
nese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
IDENT.
NO.
%N
%P
%K
/°S
/°C
%Mg
ppm
ppm Fe
ppm At
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm Zn
PPm
PPm
TI J 1
13422
TJ-2
13423
TJ-3
13424
TJ-4
13425
TJ-5
13426
LAB
Cadmium
Chro-
mium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Nitrogen
_
pH
Total
C.E.C.
NO.
ppm Cd
ppm Cr
ppm Ni
ppm Pb
ppm As
ppm Hg
ppm Se
%
(meg/100g)
13422
< 0.1
1
2
M E 11
L I I
H E
X T R
A C T
I O N
13423
< 0.1
< 1
2
13424
< 0.1
< 1
2
13425
< 0.1
1
1
1 3 2
or
c
1f
sonthis
e t
report
the total
mount
the sa pl
. ppm =
mg/kg °/
= 10,000
r mg/kg
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confiedntlal use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made
This report a plies q y t t ��sa�}p 5 e ted. Samplea are
RKyaB ng.
to the work, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
retained uiPl�
ABLE S L TO INC.
av- - -- -- --- .— —

REPORT NUMBER A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R357-175 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone] go
SEND
TO: SAINE • CNOUNT HOLLY)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
P 0 BOX 18169
6REENSBORO NC 27419
]ATE OF REPORT 12/22/92 PAGE 2
GROWER: P03 001629
JOB# 1584-92-005-
TONY .ZONES
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ACCT X 45593
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED BY: BETH SWING
^o
SAMPLE
LAB
NUMBER
ORGANIC
MATTER
y(, ••
PHUyrhUHUS
—
P1 p2
(Weak elay) N't(co J•P
PUTAS;IUM
"' ""—''
K
MAGNL•SIUM
CALCIUM
SODIUM
pH
HYDRO'
fiEN
H
Cation
I Exchange
Capacity
C.E.C.
PERCENT
BASE SATURAtION (COMPUTED)
M�
Ca
•••
Na
SOIL
BUFFER
%
%
%
%
Y.
NUMBER
ENR
RATE lbs/A
ppm'PHATE p Ie P IIATE
••••
pp. h RATE
•:•
ppm Ms RATE
pp.li C: RATE
•:•'
pp,n•No RATE
pH
pH
meq/100y
may/100p
K
MII
Cx
H
Na
TJ-6
1342
3.7 115H
5 V1
9'V
92 H
.145 Y
460 N
51 L
6.4
.6.9
0.4
4.4
5.4
27.7
52.8
9.0
5.1
TJ-7
1342
: 2.9 109H
4 WL
8 V
' 70 P
A03 Y
360 L
29 ' Y
5.8
" 6.9'
0.7
3.7
4.9
23.5.49.2
19.0
3.4
SAMPLE
NUMBER
TJ-6
TJ-7
(SEE EXPLANATION ON BACK)
MANGA•
SOLUBLE
MOLYB•
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
NITRATE
SULFUR
ZINC
NESE
WON
COPPER
BORON
EXCESS
. SALTS
CHLORIDE
DENUM
1003
pw, Ne3 N RATE
S
ppm-S RATE
ZR
ppm Zn HATE
Mn
ppm-Mn RATE
Fa
ppm Ts RATE
CU
ppm•Cu RATk
B
ppm-11 HATE
LIME
RATE
mmh.lam RATEppm•CI
CI
RATE
Me
ppm•Mo RATE
%
SAND
%
SILT
%
CLAY
SOIL
TEXTURE
A.5 L
17 N
1.1 N
1.1 L
15 N
11.3•N
Thls report applies only to the sample(s) tested. Samples are relalneo
a maximum of thirty days alter testing.
A 6 L �E� I T L BO R!�E,
('T.
'NORMAN JOKE .BY
• LVUL It) IU\I INC.: VLHY LOW (VL)• L\•v'i It. 1. WL UI UM t.;).- IIL.II I) I). VLH'Y HIUII (Vt 1). ANIJ NU VL IN 1. .... MULTIPLY IIiL RL'SULTS IN Pun. BY 4.o TU CUNV L•IlI TO LBS. PER ACRE P205
•• LNH LSI IMAT LU NITROGLN HL:1_LASL ••• • MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN pp,n BY 2.4 TO CUNVLHT TO LBS. PER ACRE K20
._ _ ... .. 11 -1.1 ..._11.1 1 c Iwo ....._ — . ... .•. ..... . ..1 .... u..0 1-1-. r... 1-1. .:. ..- -I - ....u.., AII\Sf <h,l 1 w.-ii:._. T-11 III anti I .... U.I.. Nr I.1 CfV wFI(:NT, Fnn AN ArPF DF SDI1 6-21.1 IN('NES DEEP.

REPORT NUMBER
R357-175
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
SEND
TO: S&ME (MOUNT HOLLY)
ATTN: RICK BAKES
P 0 BOX 18169
GREENSBORO NC 27419
DATE OF REPORT 4 -)lilt IQ 7 PAGE )
GROWER: P03 001629
JOB# 1584-92-005
TONY BONES
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
BY:
ACCT R 45593
BETH SWING
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potas-
Sulfur
Calcium
Mag-
Sodium
Naese
Iron
Aluminum
Manga-
Copper
Zihc
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
IDENT.
NO.
%N
pho rus
,for
,lu
sium
%S
%C
nesium
'�oMg
ppm Fe
ppm AlA
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm Zn
ppm
Ppm
PPm
Td-6
13427
Td —7
13428
LAB
Cadmium
Chro-
mium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Nitrogen
pH
Total
C.E.C.
NO.
PP m Cd
ppm Cr
ppm Ni
PP m Pb
PP m As
m H
PP 9
PP m Se
off,
(meg/100g)
13427
< 0.1
c 1
3
M E 11
L I I
H E
X T R
A C T
I 0 N
13428
< 0.1
< 1
2
Values on this
report ar
the total
mount of
the sampl
ppm =
mg/kg °/
= 10,000
mg/kg
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confledntial use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In pert, nor may any reference be made This report piles�q'}(y tQ t �pa�p�(�1 �Stad. Samples are
to the work, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. retained m Anutflbt 4 a AiyelSMaPtbeitng.
A & L U AT RIES, INC.
. R.

•
CHARLES RHYNE FARM
•

CHARLES RHYNE FARM
The Charles Rhyne farm is located near the eastern border of Gaston County in the township of
McAdenville, N.C. The proposed field (one in total) is located on the east side of S.R. 2040 (Latitude
35017'04"; Longitude 810 02' 20"). The surrounding area is predominately rural and is sparsely populated.
One field, totalling 14.40 acres (12.60 net acres), is proposed as a land application site. This field
supports fescue for hay. The field is in a good state of management and provides average to above average
yields for the crop which is being grown.
The topography of the field ranges from nearly level to gently sloping. Buffer requirements for
setbacks from residences will reduce the useable acreage in this field, however, the useable acreage should
be considered prime for use as a land application site.
The results of the soil analysis for this site, included with this report, indicate no gross deficiencies
in the fertility of this field. By using standard agricultural practices for the management of the crop, the
operator should see significant benefits from the application of residual solids. In turn, this well maintained
field should provide good assimilation of the plant available nutrients contained in the residual solids and
afford an environmentally safe means of solids disposal and nutrient cycling.
A field investigation showed well drained soils dominate the site. The applicable acreage on this
field consists of the Gaston soil series. This confirms information found in the Soil Survey of Gaston County,
North Carolina, and also was confirmed by a Soil Scientist employed by S&ME. Soil series characteristics
and a profile description is contained in Appendix II of this report.

Hardin
100
1937
so
1807 106E
1836
1802 187�5
1679
1001
180A '1805 7 .1873
1427
1112
85
tr
FAU
FAU GASTON[
4 -Av POP. 47.333
2
924
27
4
2003
719
MOUNT
HOUY
P.4,53
C-
2,143 E OP. 1PENCER MTN.69
TO OtARLOTrE
.7
FAU PE ER �b
CHARLES RHYNE FARM z
OP.
am I E . R .
0
A, 72 'r!" low 2917 3, V-
u
2 N&4
7j..
9' 70 CKARLOWE
27
279 & 100-1720
t�* L800 -_Lee
er
201 )0
IPPD
PO A,601
15
I-CRAMERTO 2398 20w-
APOP
1,069 161
FA
L &ELM 3DDO-ACL3_1
POP. 2.D6E LNE
G.0-i. M-66F.I. 321
JACKSON i& Ai, ca KEY TO ODL*M ROAD NUMBERS
FAU KNOB ca ASONUAKes lool.1M
2A15 LLI
27
1
UrA- 20i 61 2.7W
j ;70
2425 Ch 2578 273 - 17 2527
897 2 C
423' 1862 286 3 232
863 u
890
26-
2-26 2±21 213a WU
12, 7A2 2 26
'0P
.762A ---2In 73a. "08
.3
2M
215
7A
C 0 U N T
ml R C A R 0 L NR ;,P
r' A
PROJECT SCALE: I"=2 miles
Mt. Holly Land Application JOB NO: 1584-92-005
Charles Rhyne Farm FIG. NO: Location Map

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 19 (4/91)
rurtb carolitta BiWsiott of
ftWrownvatar -0a nagizini ti
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE SLUDGE
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: S&ME, Inc.
Contact Person: Mr. G F "Rick" Baker P G Greensboro S&ME Branch Mgr. [phone]
Address of Permittee: 135-C Montlieu Drive; Greensboro, N.C. 27419
List of Sludges or residuals to be applied to these lands:
City of Mount Holly WWTP - Permit# WQ0001863
Site ID Number: Charles A. Rhyne Farm
Field Number: CR-1
Location of Land to be used for sludge or residual application (include map for each site):
See attached map
Owner of Property used for sludge or residual application: Charles A. Rhyne
Lessee of Property (if. appropriate): N/A -
Land use or cropping patterns: Hay and Pasture Production
Intended use or disposition of crops: Livestock Feed
111111111IIIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllli11111111111111Illlllillllllllllilllilllllllllll
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
S&ME, Inc.
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed sludges or residuals upon the land
at the location shown as described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as
given below. The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the
nutrient value of the applied sludge or residuals while the Permittee receives, in consideration, the
use of the land described above for the disposal of digested sludge or residuals. This agreement
shall remain in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application
permit and shall be renewed each time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned
land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions
and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in advance, modifies
or cancels this Land owner's Agreement .
19of?5

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 20 (4/91)
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and
State Officials or their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to,
during, and after sludge or residual application and to established monitoring
facilities on or near the application site as required by the sludge or residual land
application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State
Officials or their representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water
samples during the term of, and twelve (12) months after. termination of, this
Agreement_
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
land application permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) for the land described above prior to commencement of sludge or residual
application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will delineate maximum application rates,
limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and
data concerning the program for land application of sludge or residuals to privately
owned lands which includes an analysis of constituents of the sludge, sludge
application methods and schedules for typical cropping patterns and a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee for sludge or residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the
results of each soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.5 prior to sludge or
residual application. Sludge may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.5
provided a sufficient amount of lime is also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime,
sludge/residual and soil mixture of at least 6.5.
7. The landowner of his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or
modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each
planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule
applications at appropriate periods. Within the limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM
permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will determine
sludge/residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the
results of soil samples.
8. No crops for direct human consumption shall be raised on these sites for a period of
eighteen (18) months following sludge application.
2� A 25

LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 21 (4/91)
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of
this Agreement for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent
sludge application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee to control public access to the
land application sites during active site use and for the eighteen (18) month period
following sludge/residual application. Such controls may include the posting of
signs indicating the activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific sludge/residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each
site by the Perminee prior to and during sludge application.
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the
land by a third party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party
agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to
comply with all provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on sludge/residual applied lands within a thirty (30)
day period following the sludge application. Application sites that are to be used for
grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods
after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of this land to a new owner, a notice shall be`given by the current
landowner to the new landowner that gives full details of. -the materials applied or
incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or. representative of -the Division of
Environmental Management may, upon presentation Hof credentials, 'enter and
inspect any property, premises or place on or related ta,the•.application-• %1te and
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determinigg compliance 4ith this
permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kepf4'40;Pic:{� he%'ierms and
conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water,
or leachate.
18. Owner/Operator agrees NOT to enter into any other land application
program agreements without giving prior notice to the permitee.
1111111111Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllliillllliililltlllllillllllllllillllllllllllllllllllll
RESTRICTIONS:
LAND OWNER:C—yAR[Fs A. WqVN£
ADDRESS: 407 W L'NR,ezarrY- Avc
Box 4.0 7
/27 . Hai-c y, N.0 . ZB12o
PHONE #: C %) 9 2 7- 0 3 3 4
OPERATOR: Al
ADDRESS:
PHONE #:
21 of 25

LAIN"D APPLIC.-kTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
PAGE 22 (4/91)
I, Cwi-ES A. WnN ANE have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby grant pe ission to the
Permiuee to apply sludgelresiduai to my lands as specified hereit
Land Owner
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, ad)2,2 COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that eA4,2l� a. %iurrtQ
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this h� th day of O e-In/, 4 ,19 92
NO��4kWifiWPLIC
Witz
j ';iFrtt7diSsioj Tres 5Z7Z97
NOTARY
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
I. 7. F, &A have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby ag_ -- to abide by the
stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permittee
i 2.17 '-
Date
22 of 25

AGREEMENT TO REDUCE BUFFERS AROUND RESIDENCES:
I, CH,4 F,5 A. 11q VAf F Of &7,-g4J9A AIE.
do hereby agree to allow The City of Mt. Holly operating under Permit No. W000018M to decrease the
buffer zones around my residence from 400 feet to 100 feet.
Owner:
Date: 192

- 11
It
•. - - - c,�fi — all
m 'L tear
�• J _ -�.. �' / l , % / %'" O' 658 \ ' `'C�e R`N 7 •V _7J!_,G/ _i--
93
1 WT
\: FIELD CR-1 ' ✓ i- /y
700
/ / //- � ''� _ ' • :�'r ..�,• 1 {r opt\��,�, 2 � J � J \ 1,•,
%I �/ ��� � � � '� 1 �t c� • � � � R o .. r; � T mil/ % %,•
��•. mil`/ '%' A �_� _.' ---r / ^1
71
00
*ba eights r ~ • I V 662
No 10 <
28
WT
�� 1r �i i . 1 o •r II. a (/�[^�. \�i(/jam \
iI`WN� �/ U• i • �•ylt` 1J -j it////1y/' _ .G�)! ✓ ',\�'`�
'ii ; � �1-� i / , ! � l /\ t` � i C� '�� `�-= 1�• `,\Rsrr �_` (y" / -��_ `� ' � \
near Ch ' • O II //l /r 1 6
5
Too ' c`gont Abe / .y' ✓
Col e
71
/Drive-i,
Theater PIPELINE ✓�
ern
•r• -_ \ �' •C •dot •+�-f C�� 1 ', •n'IOWJrCh
PROJECT
Mt. Holly Land Application
Charles Rhyne Farm
SCALE: 1"=20001
JOB NO:1584-92-005
FIG. NO : Field 1
Mount Holly, N.C. Quad. (7.5 Min.)

�. ♦•. is ,j {� �'�e't� :(.
. -�: d•C l� -1 •'-� ���<• � :.- � .ram, •,. ,
'� �•. M '•`'�" J :%1. '1.:.!' +rot
Fr 7•}
_ } `� w`
�-r+k ".tpp K f•`,air``�iti `'�. _ _ �.. lv ,,.ri•,i., `',,__ ..a' yt,,i
v 3�7—
r � - .+y�,�ix^�'! `r t� �'1•-y .F ej, •� �f�'�,L �•ria hr��
� r ...cam • .y,; t 1 _ � Y^ , .!!•�
~
�- � F r `,. Js xw. ti � ..,. '�_ .;.tom• _ �.. .wa
:"S. �� �. �j-.ra r 5 • y 'J. � ��',_� thy.: i
. :..�...� ~" P,'ir,'{','`+.::a. r� ••{ fry }(('. y:::..
J, a :.
'r�-., A �' Rom'' - pP • ;, .. �� •Fw' h �� �, , , f� , � �.
:S•'•�. fir• AO a.-' -� 7/.gar -''. .,�P '�-,Rr •• s " w
et•PO+?a
s r f.^ i •.- P ..
�.p r �fLO r� �' _ ..>r„�.; r f . /'�� 11 .•., ,.- .` �z �% J .�';i � : ; M' -� � '?'yi(���. � r. .:�., r 'i�;'
PROJECT S C ALE: 1"=660' (annrox.
JOB No'. 1584-92-005
Mt. Holly Land Application
Charles Rhyne Farm FIGS. NO:ASCS Mapping

Gap
GaE
G7
a PE..
'A qfB
fs ,c
�rauz Z.
I'- H
GaBZ ftj GA G
r
E;eBz
Ce
C f
-00-
C.,
C B2
0* F
—Nd 18V B- •UTE
0
4 'rk w
'fB U
C e B'2'
cl.
— ..
jof" 4 ;,* -F RaB 7 A
CA
Ga GaU;
-G
�h ^646
-1hLU %,I -
J,
14
P
.�., `t - - fB-s..r-,, .�, '%"4 I!t.•F': t�.' "�i �i i.l �' �.g (1' 1 "r -.'
r.A
%
C=
k1r
RM
j• 1XI
5V-"r 302
IV _;A �V
F� MM2
GaB -fB H
B
--GaB2
U d
m CH a College
C fB tf�
LrG
Wn
PROJECT r o SCALE: 1"=2000'
Mt. Holly Land Application joB No: 1584-92-005
Charles Rhyne Farm FIG. NO: SCS Soil Map -ping
Soil Survey of Gaston County, N.C.- Sheet Number 4

PROJECT
Mt. Holly Land Application
Charles Rhyne Farm
N
L end
Buff er
■ House
w Well
SCALE: 1"=660' (av)rox. )
JOB NO:1584-92-005
FIG. NO: Buffer Map

FIELD DATA SHEET
CHARLES RHYNE FARM
FIELD
GROSS -F—NET--F-
APPLICATION
NUMBER
ACRES
ACRES
CROP
SOIL SERIES
PERIOD
I CR-1 1 14.4 I 12.6 1 Fescue I Gaston 2-8% L Year Long
29—Dec-92

REPORT NUMBER
R357-174
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] U
Fax No. [phone] 1 03
SEND
To: A(MOUNT HOLLY)
TTN: -RICK BAKER
P 0 BOX 18169
GREENSBORO NC 27419
DATE OF REPORT 12122192 PAGE 1
GROWER: P03 001629
J063 1584-92-005
CHARLES RHYME
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
ACCT 8 45593
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED BETH SWING
BY:
Co•;
�---__(--_—_
SAMPLE
III
ORGANIC
LAB I MATTER
% ••
NUMBER ENR
RAZE Iha./A
I1HUS'PHORUS
11. "" """" p2''
(weal" Blay) NaHCO-I P
pp'. PRATE •••
•PRATE
PUfktiIUM
K -
••:••
PPm-A NAfE
161AGNESIUM
^Md--'
•:•
ppmM HATE.
P
CALCIUM
----
C®
•:•
DVMCaRATE
SODIUM
Na
•••
pmNeRAT(
pH
­SOILrFFIR
pH ,meQ/1009
HYDRO
REN
H
Cation
EMCAar W
Capacity
C.E.C.
rney/tUDQ
PERCENT
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED_)
% % % % Ll
0
K H lid
CR-1
1342
.2.2 95M
6 V
10 VL
53 M
83 Vh
350 M
27 VL
6.3
6.9
0.3
3.0
4.5
23.0-58.1
10.5
3.9
(SEE EXPLANATION ON HACK)
_
MANGA•
SOLUBLE.
MOLYB•
PARTICAL SIZE ANALYSIS
SAMPLE
NUMBER
NITRATE
^1O3
ppm-NO) N RATE
SULFUR
S
ppm3 RATE
ZINC
Zn
ppm.Zn RATE
NESE
MR
ppm•Mln RATE
IRON
Fe
ppm—Fe RATE
COPPER
Cu
ppm•Cu RATE
BORON
B
ppm-B RATE
EXCESS
RATE
SALTS
nim4talcm HATE
CHLORIDE
Cl`
p►rn-Cl RATE
DENUM
Mu
1111M. RATE
SAND
%
SILT
%
CLAY
SOIL
TEXTURE
CR-1
:1e3 L
25 H
1e6 H
This report aPPlles only to the samples) tested. Samples are retained
a maximum of thirty days after testing.
A 6 L T IES�40N
pTEA,1GqicuLTrQR
By
• COC1L lO RAI ING- VERY LOW (VLI. LE) W IL). MLUIUM (Ih), HIGH 11-IJ, VLr<T 1114H (V11), 11.1 NUNS I'll. •••• MULI IDLY I HL "L5UL1 S IN PPI11 nY 4.e I U GUNVL I I V I— '2"5
•• LNR - ESTIMATL:U NITROGEN RLLLASL ••••• MULTIPLY THE RESULTS IN PPn1 By 2.4 TO CONY EFT TO LOS. PER ACRE KZO
_ __ -.. .. .,. .. �. ... __-_..... "...... n.. .,.-c.c nc r..c c1 1 L,I l.tirnl cnunn MOST snit s WL.1rH TWn rol MIL 1 —W ✓ MNOS (DAY WFIGHT1 FOR AN ACRE OF SOIL 6.2/3 INCHES DEEP.

REPORT NUMBER
A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
R357-174
SAMPLES
ACCT 45593
SUBMITTED
SEND By:
TO: S&ME (MOUNT HOLLY) GROWER: P03 001629
BETH SWING
ATTN: RICK BAKER J033 1584-92-005
P 0 BOX 18169 CHARLES RHYNE
GREENSBORO NC 27419,
DATE OF REPORT
12/ 2319 2 PAGE 1 SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potas-
Sulfur
Calcium
Mag-
Sodium
Na
Iron
Aluminum
Manga-
Hasa
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
(DENT.
NO.
%N
horus
P %P
sium
%K
%S
%C
nesium
%Mg
ppm
ppm Fe
ppm Al
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm n
ppm
PPm
13421
C R-1
LAB
Cadmium
Chro-
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic.
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Nitrogen
pH
Total
C.E.C.
NO.
ppm Cd
mium
ppm Cr
ppm Ni
ppm Pb
ppm As
ppm Hg
ppm Se
%
(meg/100g)
13421
< 0.1
< 1
3
M E 11
L I
H E
X T R
A C T I O N
Values on this
report ar
the total
mount of
Is
the sampl
ppm =
mg/kg °/
= 10,000
mg/kg
I tad. Samples are
This report gppllesA t t eA • � ng.
bronu
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confiedntial use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results,
or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
retained
y
A R 0 IES, INC.
A& L

APPENDIX I
RESIDUAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS REPORTS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS
WATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS

REPORT NI =R A & L EASTERN AGRICUL IAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R277-57A 7621 WHITEPINE ROAD, RICHMOND, VA 23237
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
SEND TO: S&ME
ATTN: RICK BAKER
P 0 BOX 18169
GREENSBORO, NC 27419
DATE OF REPORT 10/01/92 PAGE 1
SAMPLES
CUSTOMER: P 0 #1380 SUBMITTED
JOB #1584-92-005 BY:
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
JAFL
0
ROB WILLCOX
SAMPLE
Lab
Solids
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potas-
SuMur
Calcium
Ma g-
Sodium
Iron
Aluml-
Manga-
Hasa
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
(DENT,
No.
%
% TKN
phorus
% P
sium
% K
% S
% Co
nesium
% Mg
% Na
ppm Fe
num
ppm AI
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm Zn
%
ppm
MT. HOLLY
WWTP
34799
3.42
6.43
1.97
0:18
1.56
3.77
0.34
0.71
1146
12200
263
620
1360
1.46
250
LAB
Cad-
Chro-
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
pH
Calcium
Carbonate
Volatile
Solids
Organic
Nitrogen
Molyb-
denum
Chloride
Boron
NO.
mium
ppm Cd
mium
ppm Cr
ppm NI
ppm Pb
ppm As
ppm Hg
ppm Se
Eq. %
%
%
ppm Mo
Ppm Cl
ppm
34799
3.5
1300
110
120
7.7
2170
All values except % Solids are on a dry weight basis. To convert % to mg/I ( %PAUL
ly by , 00.
C. �CHU.D.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be
made to the work, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
This report applies only to the sample(s) te.ted. bamples are
retain maximum of thirty days of testing.
8r T III S, INC.
—WAN JONES

Enseco East
E m e c o .
A Coming Company
JAN 15, 1993
Mr. Rob Willcox
S&ME, Inc.
135-C Montlieu Avenue
P.O. Box 18169
Greensboro, North Carolina 27419
Dear Mr. Willcox:
Enclosed are the results of the analyses performed on the one soil sample
from Mt. Holly WWTP TCLP (Enseco-East Project No. 26471; Purchase Order
No. 1625). This sample was received under chain of custody at Enseco-East
Laboratory on December 18, 1992. A brief description of the Quality
Assurance/Quality Control and method references employed by Enseco is contained
within the report. This letter authorizes the release of the analytical results
and should be considered an integral part of this report.
Please refer to this. project by the Enseco-East Laboratory Project Number
to help expedite any future discussions. We will be happy to answer any
questions or concerns that you may have.
Sincerely,
E -EAST LABO TORY
Alicia C. Pirrocco
Program Administrator
Enc.
lc
Enseco Incorporated
2200 Cottontail lane
Somerset, New, Jersey 08875-0745
908/469-5800 Fax:908/ac,9-7516

Eseco
A Coming Company
QUALITY ASSURANCE/OUALITY CONTROL
To ensure data quality, an extensive QA/QC program has been implemented at
Enseco-East which incorporates the following controls (as applicable).
Reagent _Qr analytical blanks are analyzed to assess the level of
contamination which exists in the analytical system. An analytical blank,
analyzed with every batch of samples, consists of reagents specific to the
method. This blank is carried through every aspect of the procedure,
including preparation, cleanup, and analysis. Ideally, the concentration
of an analyte in the blank is below the reporting limit for that analyte.
However, some common laboratory solvents and metals are difficult to
eliminate to the part -per -billion levels commonly reported in environmental
analyses.
Duplicate Control Samples (DCS) are used to monitor the laboratory's
day-to-day performance of routine analytical methods. A DCS consists of a
standard, control matrix which is spiked with a group of target compounds
representative of the method analytes._ The DCS is analyzed with
environmental samples to provide evidence that the laboratory -is performing
the method within accepted QC.guidelines.
A DCS has been established for most routine analytical methods.
Reagent water is used as the control matrix for the analysis of aqueous
samples. The DCS compounds are spiked into reagent water and carried
through the appropriate steps of the analysis. As stated in SW-846
(third edition), a universal blank matrix does not exist for solid samples
and therefore no matrix is used. The DCS for solid samples consists of the
appropriate steps of the analysis. The data thus obtained are used to set
the DCS control limits. The control limits for accuracy are based on the
historical average recovery of the DCS plus or minus three standard
deviation units. The control limits for precision are based on the
historical relative percent difference (RPD) and range from zero (no
difference between duplicate samples) to the average RPD plus three standard
deviation units.
Surrogates are organic compounds that are similar to the analytes of
interest in chemical behavior but which are not normally found in
environmental samples. Surrogates are routinely added to samples requiring
GC/MS analysis to monitor the effect of the matrix on the accuracy of the
analysis. Results are reported in terms of percent recovery.

' Eseco
A Coming Company
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The method number provided on each data report sheet refers to a
publication originating from a regulatory or standard -setting organization.
In general, the methods employed are those specified by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and other state and federal agencies. In cases where an
approved regulatory method does not exist, a method developed by Enseco will
be employed to meet the specific needs of the client. The methods commonly
employed by Enseco are based on methods from the following references.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water
and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020..Cincinnati, OH, March 1983.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods. (SW-846); Washington, D.C. November 1986.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Methods for the Determination of Organic
Compounds in Finished Drinking Water and Raw Source Water. Cincinnati, OH,
September 1986.
Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the analysis of Pollutants Under
the Clean Water Act, 40 CFR, Part 136; Federal Register, (1984).
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water
Pollution Control Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
and Wastewater, 16th edition. Washington, D.C., April 1985.
EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocols for the analysis of organic
and inorganic hazardous substances.

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION INFORMATION
for
S&ME, Inc.
Lab ID Client ID
026471-0001-SA MT HOLLY WWTP
026471-0001-MS MT HOLLY WWTP MATRIX SPIKE
026471-0002-BL LEACHATE BLANK
Esc co
A Coming Company
Sampled Received
Matrix Date Time Date
SOIL 17 DEC 92 18 DEC 92
SOIL 17 DEC 92 18 DEC 92
LEACHATE 17 DEC 92 18 DEC 92

Volatile Organics - Toxicity Characteristic List
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8240
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Sampled: 17 DEC
92
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Matrix: SOIL
Received: 18 DEC
92
Prepared: 29 DEC 93
Authorized: 18 DEC
92
Analyzed: 29 DEC 93
Reporting
Parameter
Result
Units
Limit -
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Vinyl Chloride
ND
mg/L
0.050
Surrogate
Recovery
Toluene -dB
102
%
4-Bromofluorobenzene
104
%
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
104
%
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Kelvin Wang Approved By: Khaja Eazazuddin
Eseco
A Coming Company

Volatile Organics - Toxicity Characteristic List
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8240
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID: 026471-0002-BL
Matrix: LEACHATE
Parameter
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Surrogate
Toluene-d8
4-Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Kelvin Wang
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Recovery,
107 %
107 %
109 %
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 29 DEC 93
Analyzed: 29 DEC 93
Reporting
Limit
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.050
0.025
0.025
0.050
Approved By: Khaja Eazazuddin
Enseco
A Coming Company

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
QC
SAMPLE TYPE
TEST
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NUMBER
LOT
Enseco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE 8240-TCLP-SL 026471-0001-MS 23 DEC 92-D

Eseco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Analyte
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
Concentration
Matrix Amount
Sample Spike Spiked
96
Rec
NO
0.27
0.25
107
ND
0.24
0.25
95
ND
0.26
0.25
105
ND
0.25
0.25
100
ND
0.27
0.25
108
ND
0.23
0.25
93
NO
0.24
0.25
98
ND
0.26
0.25
103
NO
0.26
0.25
105
ND
0.23
0.25
91
ND = Not detected.
NC - Not calculated; calculation not applicable.
All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off
errors in calculated results.

'.� Enseco
A Coming Company
QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Laboratory
QC
Lot
Number
QC
Run
Number
Sample Number
QC Matrix
QC Category
(DCS)
(SCS/BLANK)
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
VOA-MS-TL
23
DEC
92-D
29
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
VOA-MS-TL
23
DEC
92-D
29
DEC
92-A
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
VOA-MS-TL
23
DEC
92-D
29
DEC
92-A

DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Analyte
Category: VOA-MS-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D
Concentration Units: MG/L
1,1-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Enseco
A Coming Company
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
DCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Limit
0.050
0.0514
0.0498
0.0506
101
61-145
3.2
14
0.050
0.0486
0.0475
0.'0480
96
71-120
2.3
14
0.050
0.0540
0.0516 -
0.0528
106
76-127
4.5
11
0.050
0.0494
0.0477
0.0486
97
76-125
3.5
13
0.050
0.0448
0.0443
0.0446
89
75-130
1.1
13
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Enseco
A Coming Company
SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Concentration Accuracy(%)
Analyte Spiked Measured SCS Limits
Category: VOA-MS-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 0.250 0.260 104 70-121
4-Bromofluorobenzene 0.250 0.257 103 86-115
Toluene-d8 0.250 0.257 103 88-110
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

�. Enseco
A Coming Company
METHOD BLANK REPORT
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Vinyl Chloride
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Vinyl Chloride
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Benzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Chloroform
NO
mg/L
0.025
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.025
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
mg/L
0.050
Tetrachloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025
Trichloroethene
ND
mg/L
0.025

Eseco
A Coming Company
METHOD BLANK REPORT
'Volatile Organics by GC/MS (cunt.)
Analyte
Test: 8240-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-D
Reporting
Result Units Limit
QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Vinyl Chloride ND mg/L 0.050

Enseco
Semivolatile Organics - Toxicity Characteristic List A Coming Company
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8270
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA Sampled: 17 DEC 92 Leached: 21 DEC 92
Matrix: SOIL Received: 18 DEC 92 Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92 Analyzed: 09 JAN 93
Reporting
Parameter
Result
Units
Limit
m & p-Cresol(s)
0.13
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,47Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
.2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050
Surrogate Recovery
Nitrobenzene-d5
40 %
2-Fluorobiphenyl
32 %
Terphenyl-d14
35 %
Phenol-d5
33 %
2-Fluorophenol
36' %
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
50 %
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Todd Fenton Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn

Semivolatile Organics - Toxicity
Characteristic List
Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8270
Client Name:
S&ME, Inc.
Client ID:
LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID:
026471-0002-BL
Sampled: 17
DEC 92 Leached: 21 DEC 92
Matrix:
LEACHATE
Received: 18
DEC 92 Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Authorized: 18
DEC 92 Analyzed: 07 JAN 93
Reporting
Parameter Result Units Limit
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050
Surrogate Recovery
Nitrobenzene-d5
74 %
2-Fluorobiphenyl
59 %
Terphenyl-d14
60 %
Phenol-d5
59 %
2-Fluorophenol
68 %
2.,4,6-Tribromophenol
85 %
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Todd Fenton Approved By: Lori Ann Quinn
Eseco
A Coming Company

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
QC
SAMPLE TYPE TEST
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NUMBER
LOT
Enseco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE 8270-TCLP-SL 026471-0001-MS 23 DEC 92-A

Emcco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Concentration
Matrix Amount %
Analyte Sample Spike Spiked Rec
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
m & p-Cresol(s)
0.13
0.84
1.0
71
o-Cresol
ND
0.35
0.50
70
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
NO
0.14
0.25
58
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
NO
0.17
0.25
68
Hexachlorobenzene
NO
0.14
0.25
56
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
0.16
0.25
64
Hexachloroethane
NO
0.14
0.25
57
Nitrobenzene
NO
0.18
0.25
73
Pentachlorophenol
NO
0.45
0.50
89
Pyridine
ND
0.14
0.25
56
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.33
0.50
66
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
NO
0.35
0.50
70
ND = Not detected.
NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable.
All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off
errors in calculated results.

QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Laboratory
Sample Number QC Matrix QC Category
026471-0001-SA LEACHATE BNA-TL
026471-0001-MS LEACHATE BNA-TL
026471-0002-BL LEACHATE BNA-TL
QC Lot Number
(DCS)
23 DEC 92-A
23 DEC 92-A
23 DEC 92-A
Enseco
A Coming Company
QC Run Number
(SCS/BLANK)
28 DEC 92-A
28 DEC 92-A
23 DEC 92-A

Eseco
A Coming Company
DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Analyte Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
DCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Limit
Category: BNA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
Pyridine
0.050
0.0230
0.0275
0.0252
51
20-200
18
50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.050
0.0437
0.0384
0.0410
82
33-128
13
18
2-Methylphenol
0.10
0.0848
0.0754
0.0801
80
46-110
12
17
m & p-Cresol(s)
1.0
0.144
0.133
0.138
14
38-102
7.9
15
Hexachloroethane
0.050
0.0386
0.0328
0.0357
71
13-120
16
26
Nitrobenzene
0.050
0.0460
0.0387
0.0424
85
41-127
17
16
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.050
0.0409
0.0340
0.0374
75
26-126
18
35
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.10
0.0909
0.0823
0.0866
87
47-110
9.9
35
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.10
0.0837
0.0756
0.0796
80
41-116
10
24
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.050
0.0407.
0.0400
0.0404
81
11-110
1.7
21-
Hexachlorobenzene
0.050
0.0381
0.0355
0.0368
74
32-122
7.1
17
Pentachlorophenol
0.10
0.0451
0.0203
0.0327
33
9-103
76
50
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Eseco
A Coming Company
SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Concentration
Accuracy(%)
Analyte,
Spiked
Measured
SCS
Limits
Category: BNA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
QC Run:
28 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units:
mg/L
Nitrobenzene-d5
0.100
0.0555
56
36-114
2-F1uorobiphenyl
0.100
0.0461
46
43-116
Te
0.100
0.0529
53
33-141
pPhenyl-d14
2-Fluorophenol
0.200
0.0717
36
21-100
Phenol-d5
0.200
0.0463
23
10- 94
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.200
0.131
66
10-123
Category: BNA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
QC Run:
23 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units:
mg/L
Nitrobenzene-d5
0.100
0.0591
59
36-114
2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.100
0.0622
62
43-116
Tephenyl-d14
0.100
0.0626
63
33-141
2-Fluorophenol
0.200
0.0890
44
21-100
Phenol-d5
0.200
0.0521
26
10- 94
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.200
0.143
72
10-123
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Enseco
A Coming Company
METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachloroethane
ND
mg/L
0.050
Nitrobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Pentachlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
Pyridine
ND
mg/L
0.10
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
mg/L
0.050
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 23 DEC 92-A
m & p-Cresol(s)
ND
mg/L
0.050
o-Cresol
ND
mg/L
0.050
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
mg/L
0.050
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
mg/L
0.050

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC/MS (cont.)
Analyte
Test: 8270-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 23 DEC 92-A
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Result
QC Run: 23 DEC 92-A
Reporting
Units Limit
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND
mg/L
0.25
ND
mg/L
0.10
ND
mg/L
0.25
ND
mg/L
0.050
Eseco
A Coming Company

TCLP Organochlorine Pesticides
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8080
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL
Parameter
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor.
Toxaphene
Surrogate
Dibutyl chlorendate
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Amanda McFadden
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Recovery
69
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
76
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Analyzed: 05 JAN 93
Reporting
Limit
0.00050
0.0050
0.0010
0.00050
0.0050
0.050
Approved By: Dan Segal
Enseco
A Coming Company

Enseco
TCLP Organochlorine Herbicides - Method 8150 Modified A Coming Compan�,
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8150
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL
Parameter
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Surrogate
DCAA
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result Units
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
Recovery
65 %
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Analyzed: 04 JAN 93
Reporting
Limit
0.0050
0.0010
Approved By: Dan Segal

TCLP Organochlorne Pesticides
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8080
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID: 026471-0002-BL
Matrix: LEACHATE
Parameter
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Surrogate
Dibutyl chlorendate
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable`
Reported By: Amanda McFadden
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Recovery
89
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Analyzed: 31 DEC 92
Reporting
Limit
0.00050
0.0050
0.0010
0.00050
0.0050
0.050
Approved By: Dan Segal
Enseco
A Coming Company

'Enscco
TCLP Organochlorine Herbicides - Method 8150 Modified A Coming Company
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Method 8150
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID: 026471-0002-BL
Matrix: LEACHATE
Parameter
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Surrogate
DCAA
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Shanthi Damarapu
Sampled: 17 DEC 92
Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92
Result Units
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
Recovery
78 %
Leached: 21 DEC 92
Prepared: 28 DEC 92
Analyzed: 03 JAN 93
Reporting
Limit
0.0050
0.0010
Approved By: Dan Segal

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
QC
SAMPLE TYPE
MATRIX SPIKE
MATRIX SPIKE
TEST
8080-TCLP-SL
8150-TCLP-SL
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NUMBER
026471-0001-MS
026471-0001-MS
Fmeco
A Coming Company
LOT
28 DEC 92-A
18 DEC 92-A

Enseco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Analyte
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Concentration
Matrix Amount
Sample Spike Spiked
76
Rec
ND
0.0022
0.0025
86
ND
0.0022
0.0025
87
ND
0.0041
0.0050
82
ND
0.019
0.025
77
ND
0.0066
0.0050
131
ND
0.00089
0.0010
89
ND = Not detected.
NC = Not calculated; calculation not applicable.
All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off
errors in calculated results.

Enseco
A Coming Company
QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Laboratory
QC
Lot
Number
QC
Run
Number
Sample Number
QC Matrix
QC Category
(DCS)
(SCS/BLANK)
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
8080-TCLP
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
8150-TL
18
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
8080-TCLP
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
8150-TL
18
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
8080-TCLP
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
8150-TL
18
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A

Eseco
A Coming Company
DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Concentration
Accuracy
Precision
Analyte
Spiked
Measured
Average(%)
(RPD)
DCS1
DCS2
AVG
DCS
Limits
DCS Limit
Category: 8080-TCLP
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.0025
0.00241
0.00254
0.00248
99
19-140
5.3
40
Heptachlor
0.0025
0.00272
0.00288
0.00280
112
34-111
5.7
40
Endrin
0.0025
0.00255
0.00270
0.00262
105
30-147
5.7
40
Methoxychlor
0.025
0.0255
0.0267
0.0261
104
50-150
4.6
50
Heptachlor epoxide
0.0025
0.00256
0.00269
0.00262
105
37-142
5.0
40
Category: 8150-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: ug/1
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
2,4-D
1.0 0.998 0.834 0.916 92 19-154 18 50
5.0 6.54 6.87 6.70 134 5-140_ 4.9 38
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Enseco
A Coming Company
SINGLE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Concentration Accuracy(%)
Analyte Spiked Measured SCS Limits
Category: 8150-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: ug/L
DCAA 25.0 21.1 84 60-148
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC
Analyte
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Result
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC-92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Reporting
Units Limit
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.0010
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND mg/L 0.0050
ND mg/L 0.0010
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.0010
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND mg/L 0.0050
ND mg/L 0.0010
Enseco
A Coming Company

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Semivolatile Organics by GC (cont.)
Analyte
Test: 8080-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
Heptachlor
(and its epoxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Test: 8150-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 18 DEC 92-A
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Result
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Reporting
Units Limit
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.0010
ND
mg/L
0.00050
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND mg/L 0.0050
ND mg/L 0.0010
Eseco
A Coming Company

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Metals
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Mercury
Silver
Result
ND
0.23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Michael Lifton
Enseco
A Coming Company
Sampled: 17 DEC
92 Leached: 21 DEC
92
Received:
18 DEC
92 Prepared:
See
Below
Authorized:
18 DEC
92 Analyzed:
See
Below
Reporting
Analytical
Prepared
Analyzed
Units
Limit.
Method
Date
Date
mg/L
0.10
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.0050
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.20
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.050 '6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.00020
7470
29 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
Approved By: John Minervini

General Chemistry
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: MT HOLLY WWTP
EI"L cco
A Coming Company
Lab ID: 026471-0001-SA
Matrix: SOIL Sampled: 17 DEC 92 Received: 18 DEC 92
Authorized: 18 DEC 92 Prepared: See Below Analyzed: See Below
Reporting Analytical Prepared Analyzed
Parameter Result Units Limit Method Date Date
Corrosivity 7.5 units 0.010 9045 NA 30 DEC 92
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Joanne Acevedo Approved By: Deanna Doster

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Metals
Client Name: S&ME, Inc.
Client ID: LEACHATE BLANK
Lab ID: 026471-0002-BL
Matrix: LEACHATE
Parameter
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Mercury
Silver
Result
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected
NA = Not applicable
Reported By: Michael Lifton
Enseco
A Coming Company
Sampled: 17 DEC
92 Leached: 21 DEC 92
Received:
18 DEC
92 Prepared:
See
Below
Authorized:
18 DEC
92 Analyzed:
See
Below
Reporting
Analytical
Prepared
Analyzed
Units.
Limit
Method
Date
Date
mg/L
0.10
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L'
0.0050
6010
28-DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.20
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.050
6010
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.00020
7470
29 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
mg/L
0.010
.6010 -
28 DEC
92
29
DEC
92
Approved By: John Minervini

MATRIX SPECIFIC QC
ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
QC
SAMPLE TYPE
MATRIX SPIKE
MATRIX SPIKE
TEST
HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
ICP-TCLP-SL
LABORATORY
SAMPLE NUMBER
026471-0001-MS
026471-0001-MS
-' Enseco
A Coming Company
LOT
29 DEC 92-A
29 DEC 92-C

Enseco
A Coming Company
MATRIX SPIKE REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Concentration
Matrix
Amount
%
Analyte
Sample
Spike
Spiked
Rec
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
Mercury
ND
0.00087
0.0010
87
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix SOIL
Sample: 026471-0001
Units: mg/L
Arsenic
ND
4.6
5.0
91
Barium
0.23
17.8
20.0
88
Cadmium
ND
0.56
0.50
111
Chromium
NO
2.3
2.0
114
Selenium
ND
0.63
0.50
126
Lead
ND
5.0
5.0
101
Silver
ND
0.45
0.50
90
ND = Not detected.
NC = Not calculated;
calculation not applicable.
All calculations are
performed before rounding to avoid
round -off
errors in calculated
results.

QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Metals Preparation Department
Laboratory
Sample Number QC Matrix
026471-0001-SA AQUEOUS
QC Category
CORR-PH-A
QC Lot Number
(DCS)
30 DEC 92-A
Eseco
A Coming Company
QC Run Number
(SCS/BLANK)

Emeco
A Coming Company
DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Metals Preparation Department
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Analyte Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
DCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Limit
Category: CORR-PH-A
Matrix: AQUEOUS
QC Lot: 30 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: units
Corrosivity 7.00 6.94 6.95 6.94 99 90-110 0.1 10
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Eseco
A Coming Company
QC LOT ASSIGNMENT REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Laboratory
QC
Lot
Number
QC
Run
Number
Sample Number
QC Matrix
QC Category
(DCS)
(SCS/BLANK)
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
HG-CVAA-TL
29
DEC
92-A
29
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-SA
LEACHATE
ICP-TL
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
HG-CVAA-TL
29
DEC
92-A
29
DEC
92-A
026471-0001-MS
LEACHATE
ICP-TL
29
DEC
92-C
29
DEC
92-C
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
HG-CVAA-TL
29
DEC
92-A
29
DEC
92-A
026471-0002-BL
LEACHATE
ICP-TL
28
DEC
92-A
28
DEC
92-A
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

Enseco
A Coming Compam-
DUPLICATE CONTROL SAMPLE REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Concentration Accuracy Precision
Analyte Spiked Measured Average(%) (RPD)
DCS1 DCS2 AVG DCS Limits DCS Limit
Category: HG-CVAA-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
Mercury
0.001
0.000910
0.000950
0.000930
93
80-120
4.3
20
Category: ICP-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
Concentration Units: mg/L
Arsenic
2.0
2.06
2:07
2.06
103
80-120
0.4
20
Barium
2.0
1.90
1.90
1.90
95
80-120
0.1
20
Cadmium
0.05
0.0483
0.0502
0.0492
98
80-120
3.9
20
Chromium
0.2
0.200
0.201
0.200
100
80-120
0.9
20
Lead
0.5
0.518
0.522
0.520
104
80-120
0.8
20
Silver
0.05
0.0509
0.0501
0.0505
101
60-120
1.6
20
Selenium
0.5
0.519
0.528
0.524
105
80-120
1.6
20
Category: ICP-TL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-C
Concentration Units: mg/L
Arsenic
2.0
2.12
2.07
2.10
105
80-120
2.2
20
Barium
2.0
1.92
1.90
1.91
95
80-120
0.9
20
Cadmium
0.05
0.0510
0.0495
0.0502
101
80-120
3.0
20
Chromium
0.20
0.204
0.202
0.203
101
80-120
1.4
20
Lead
0.50
0.537
0.519
0.528
106
80-120
3.5
20
Silver
0.05
0.0515
0.0507
0.0511
102
60-120
1.6
20
Selenium
0.5
0.514
0.496
0.505
101
80-120
3.5
20
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results.

METHOD BLANK REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Mercury ND mg/L 0.00020
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Silver
ND
mg/L
0.10
ND
mg/L
0.010
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.010
ND
mg/L
0.20
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND
mg/L
0.010
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Mercury ND mg/L 0.00020
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix: SOIL
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-C QC Run: 29 DEC 92-C
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Lead
Silver
ND
mg/L
0.10
ND
mg/L
0.010
ND
mg/L
0.0050
ND
mg/L
0.010
ND
mg/L
0.20
ND
mg/L
0.050
ND
mg/L
0.010
Eseco
A Coming Company

Enseco
A Coming Company
METHOD BLANK REPORT
Metals Analysis and Preparation (cost.)
Reporting
Analyte Result Units Limit
Test: HG-CVAA-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 29 DEC 92-A QC Run: 29 DEC 92-A
Mercury
ND
mg/L
0.00020
Test: ICP-TCLP-SL
Matrix: LEACHATE
QC Lot: 28 DEC 92-A
QC Run: 28 DEC 92-A
Arsenic
ND
mg/L
0.10
Barium
ND
mg/L
0.010
Cadmium
ND
mg/L
0.0050
Chromium
ND
mg/L
0.010
Selenium
ND
mg/L
0.20
Lead
ND
mg/L
0.050
Silver
ND
mg/L
0.010

�Ense
A Coming I ir
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD ENe�asc
CkMINT NAME
,•��O8 WILL�'Ov
COMPANY
�
y 5./11E, INC.
• W' ADDRESS
0 I3� C IMONTLIEU AVF.
G1��FnI l�clao, AJ.f Z741�
PROJECT NAME
l/oLL y 4AA10 14P,01.1,-A rya
SAMPLER NAME
Po8 WILLC 0V
METHOD OF SHIPMENT 7AIR BILL NUMBER COOLER
FED -)(
A--I-#I-.1 TAT Cneh D9va
( ?/,? ) 055 - 7547
N l(025
PHONE NUMBER
(7i� 655.754'1
NUMBER CUSTODY SEAL NUMBER
/08 �1387Ce
ormal Days r
PAGE OF SHIP TO: -NS :AST
2201 ratan Lane
Somarwrt NJ 00875
(008) 46"000
ERCO
205 Alewife Brook Parkway
Cambridge MA 02138
(B17) 881.9111
ANALYSES
t
MAW
©
MOEN
INNER NMENEM ==ME■
ONEW NEE MEMMOMME
NOMMEMEMOMMIN
AMA
El
HIM
�■�010110110110HIM
�
■����t������
MENNEN
M■isMIMIMI
■EMMEMEMEME■
SAMPLE RELINQUISHE .:
®�SAMPLERECEIVED
=
zj

WATER TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUAL SOLIDS

REPORT N �ER A & L EASTERN AGRICUL_ _ 3AL LABORATORIES, INC.
R5-126A 7621 WHITEPINE ROAD, RICHMOND, VA 23237 [phone]
AIL
SEND SAMPLES
TO: WESTINGHOUSE ENV & GEO SERVICES INEUSTOMER: MT HOLLY WTP SUBMITTED ROB WILLCOX
3109 SPRING FOREST ROAD BY.
P 0 BOX 58069
RALEIGH, NC 27658
DATE OF REPORT 01/15/92 PAGE 1 SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE
Lab
Solids
Nitrogen
Phos-
Potas-
SuHur
Calcium
Meg'
Sodium
Iron .
Alum{-
Manger-
nose
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nhrato
Nhrog6n
IDENT,
No.
%
% TKN
phorus
% P
alum
% K
% S..-
% Ca
nesium
% Mg
% Na .
ppm Fe
num
ppm Al
ppm Mn
ppm Cu
ppm Zn
ppm
WTP
ALUM
SLUDGE
30133
9.53
0.52
0.20
0.11
0.29
0.08
0.30
0.03
64000
58
72
0.01
220
LAB
Cad-
Chro-
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Calcium
Carbonate
Volatile
Solids
Organic
Nitrogen
Molyb-
denum
Chloride
Boron
NO2-N
NO.
mium
ppm Cd
mium
ppm Cr
ppm NI
ppm
ppm
ppm H9
ppm. Se
pH
Eq. %
%
%
ppm Mo
ppm Cl
ppm
DDM
30133
0.5
30
35 45
6.3
515
1.10
AUL C.H. CHU, PH D
All values axcept % Solids an on a dry weight basis. To convert % to mg/l Ippm) multiply by 10.000.
Our reports and lavers are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In pert, nor may any reference be
made to the work On results, or the company In any advertising, news release, of other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
This repoA es only to the samples) tested. Sample an
retainedAtum hlrty days atler besdrp.A UL L T
►M
J

Westinghouse Environmental 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
and Geotechnical Services, Inc. Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
P.O. Box 7668
Charlotte, North Carolina 28241-7668
(704) 5234726
Toxic Characteristic FAX [phone]
Regulatory Package
Westinghouse Environmental Job No.: 1357-91-1875 Lab No.: 0475
4,
Sample Identification:
Date Completed: 1/14/92
Volatile Compounds
Mt. Holly (GBWB037) WTP-Alum
Quant.Limit Results
mqf L mg/L
Benzene
0.01
BQL
Carbon tetrachloride
0.01
BQL
Chlorobenzene
0.01
BQL
Chloroform
0.01
BQL
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.01
BQL
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.01
BQL
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
0.01
BQL
Tetrachoroethylene
0.01
BQL
Trichloroethylene
0.01
BQL
Vinyl Chloride
0.01
BQL
Base Neutral Acids
o-Cresol
0.01
BQL
m-Cresol
0.01
BQL
p-Cresol
0.01
BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.01
BQL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.01
BQL
Hexachlorobenzene
0.01
BQL
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.01
BQL
Hexachloroethane
0.01
BQL
Nitrobenzene
0.01
BQL
Pyridine
0.01
ND
Pentachlorophenol
0.05
BQL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.01
BQL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.01
BQL
Pesticides
Chlordane
0.002
BQL
Endrin
0.0005
BQL
Heptachlor
0.0005
BQL
Lindane
0.0005
BQL
Methoxychlor
0.0005
BQL
Toxaphene
0.002
BQL
A Westinghouse Electric Corporation subsidia-y

Westinghouse Environmental 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
and Geotechnical Services, Inc. Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
P.O. Box 7668
Charlotte, North Carolina 28241-766B
(704) 523A726
FAX [phone]
Toxic Characteristic
Regulatorq Package
Westinghouse Environmental Job No.: 1357-91-1875 Lab No.: 0475
Sample Identification: Mt. Holly (GBWB037) WTP-Alum
Date Completed: 1/14/92
Quant.Limit Results
Herbicides mgfL M
2,4-D 0.06 BQL
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.009 BQL
Metals
Arsenic
0.05
BQL
Barium
0.05
0.22
Cadmium
0.005
BQL
Chromium
0.002
0.030
Lead
0.05
BQL
Mercury
0.01
BQL
Selenium
0.01
0.12
Silver
0.005
BQL
Comments:
Results corrected according to recoveries
derived from
matrix spikes of each sample.
BQL = Below Quanti on Limits
QA/QC Supervisor: Date: / /2-n/92
N.C. State Wastewater #321, S.C.D.H.E.C. #99033
A Westinghouse Elez—ic Corporation subsidiary

APPENDIX II
SOIL SERIES DESCRIPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS RECORDS

CECIL

LOCATION CECIL NC+AL EA SC VA
Established Series
Rev. A : 20-k!
_, i
CEC I L SERIES
The C:ec i l series consists of very deer:, well drained moderately
e:'mea e soils on ridges and slopes r. r: :
•tee •f the Piedmont errs ^t uplands. They
are deem to sapr-o l i to and very deep to bedrock:. 7 ney formed in residuum
weathered from fe l s , c crystalline rocks of the P i eamon:t uplands. Slopes
range from 0 to 25 percent. Meant annual precipitation is 48 inches and
mean annual temperature is 59 degrees F. near the tyre location.
TA�/�-INOMIC. CLASS: Clayey, kao l :... t : thermic T K nh ,,._, ,, c , , }'r c u ter: ,
TYPICAL PEDC:R: Cecil sandy loam --forested. (Colors ar"e for moist Sol!
unless otherwise stated.)
O i2 to _ inchesp very dark grayish t:r-=-awn, (2. 3/2) partially
decayed leaves and twigs. (0 to 3 inches thick)
A- 0 to 2 inches; dart; grayish brown (10YR 4 /2) sandy loam; web►::
medium granular structure; very friable; many fine roots; strongly acid;
clear wavy boundary. (Z to 8 inches thick)
E- to 7 inches; grown (7.5YR 5/4) sandy loam; weals medium
granular structure; very friable; many fine and medium roots; few
pebbles of quartz; strongly acid; clear .smooth boundary. (0 to 10
inches thick:)
BE--7 to 11 inches; yellowish red (5YR 4/1l sandy c!ay loam; weak:
medium granular structure; very friable; many fine roots; strongly acid;
clear wavy boundary. (Z to 8 inches thick)
Pt1--11 to «: inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay; moderate medium
subangu l ar blocky structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common thick:
distinct clay films on faces of reds; few fine flakes of mica; few small
pebbles of quartz; strongly acid; Sr-adua i smooth boundary.
Bt '--2t to 40 inches; red (2.5YR 4/8) clay; moderate and weal:
medium subanau l ar- :: lucky structure; r i rm; sticky, plastic; common thin
clay films on faces of peds; few to common fine flakes of mica; strongly
acid; _ -adua smooth boundary. (Combined to i ck:ness of the Bt horizon is
24 to 48 inches)
BtS: 40 to 50 inches; red (2.5YR 5/8) clay lamp common mecium-
d i st , nct strong browns (7.5YR 5/6) mottles•; weak: medium sunangu l ar blocky
structure; friable; few thin: distinct clay films on: vertical faces or
peds; common fine flakes of mica; strongly ac : ; granual smooth
boundary. (7 to 20 inches thick)
C--50 to 75 inches; mottled red (2.5YR 5/2) , strong bra"" (7.5YR
5/S)r and pal e brown ( 10Y _/ 2) ! tia,y sa;o : i te r-gne i ss; common
.;n
packets of clay loam; massive; rr,at'.e; CC,r^•:on fine flakes of mica;
str-o. g!y acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Catawba County, North -o! t= 4 m l s: t =t f
i, - Caro! f:a; _ 1/ es=:u„�;ea._ r:
Newton, North Carolina, on NC yam•; then s o1 h on Ma i an: Roan, Highway ght• ay

PAGE OZ
1810, for /`i mi le; 1:4 m{ le 'west on Farm Road, 25 feet ME in .•.+ioo c.
area.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: So l um th • c ..:e` s ranges from 40 to more thaw,
.. 60 inches. Depth to bedrock ,s g than _ f + .d o i
iCi; �,"-eZtE'r C:•. feet and rangest iC•
feet or more. Unless l I med, the so . l ranges from very strongly acid to
moderately acid in the A horizons zoos and is s tronc, ; y acid or very strongly
acid in the E and C horizons, Limed so i t s are typ i c a i l y moderately acid
or s l i ght l y acid in the upper part. Content of coarse fragments of
gravel and cobble size range from i_r o + � i h
9• � t t _ _ _ percent earl„ ; vc:. �.^e -; the A
horizon and O to :O percent by volume in the Et horizon. Most pecons
have few to: common r- and t- many
c r,,., ,� flakes ��f mica i ,• the ,, horizon ��in a:,•� few _ r, a•
flakes of mica in the PC and C hnr i zo: s.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of `. FV to 1r_iYR f � value o` I to F,f and
chroma of Z to S. A horizons with value of 2 are less than 6 Inches
thick. The A horizon is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or loam in the
• •E earth fraction. The Alhorizon is sandy Idm^, fine sandy 1
C:f,
loam, sandy clay loam, or clay loam in the fine earth fraction.
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 7.5YR or !OYR, value of 4 to 6,
and chroma of c to S. The E horizon is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or
loam in the fine -earth fraction.
The BA or BE horizon, where present, has hue of 2.5YR to IOYR, value of
4 to 6, and chroma of 3 to S. It is sandy clay boar,:, loam, or clay
loam.
The Bt horizon contains 35 to 60 percent clay and extends to depths of
TO to 60 inches. :t has true of !OTC or -SYR, value of 4 or 5, and
chroma of 6 or 8. Hue also ranges to 5YR if evident patterns of
mottling are lacking in the rat and PC horizons. Mottles that are few
and random are included. The Pt horizon is clay loam or clay and
contains less than TO percent silt.
The PC horizon, where present, has hue of IOR to 5YR, va! ue of 4 or 6,
and chroma of 4 to S. Mott ies in shades of yeliow or Frown are few to
common in the PC- horizon of some pedons. The BC horizon is sandy clay
loam, clay loam, or loam.
The C horizon is similar_ in color to the PC: horizon or it is
m0tic0ored. it Is !oarr:y saprol ite weather"ec: from feisic crystalline
rock.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the App I i c J f Bethlehem, Madison, Nank i n,
Paco ! et, Tumb l eton, and Wedowee series in the same family. Those in
closely related families are the Aragon, Braddock, C:atau! a, C:hestatee,
Cullen, Geergev i I l e, L'.ayesv i l i e, `-erndon, K I wassee, Hulett, Ko ! omoi:: i ,
Mayodan, Mecklenburg, 5potsyivania, Tatum and Wedowee series. AppIInc
so I l s. have dominant hue of 7.5YR or ye l lower or where hue is 5YR ➢ t has
evident patterns of mottling in a su hor" z _ n of the Bt or BC horizon.
Aragon sot is contain fragments of chert and nave a coertylimestone
hor I z:_,n. Eetn l enem so i I s are Koderate'•y deep to weatner"ea becrocr:: r_:r
s i l ! manite schist, phyl l ite schist, or mica schist. Br
HayesviIie soils are mesic. Catau!a sails have a fragipan, Chestatee
so i i s contain more than ;C• percent, ny vo:u�e, f coarse fragments
throughout the pecion. Cullen, Mayocan, recf.er-ug a�= Tatum soils have
M i XEC mineralogy. Geor`;ev • l l e and Herndon so i ! s• contain more than 30

, PASE 03
percent si /t. Hiwassee soi!s have rhod!c colors to oepths :f 40 .ncnes
:r more. Hulett, Nankin, Spotsy;va:ia, arc wed:wee soils have a Bt
horizon ': hue :f 5YR or ye!!ower, in adoi±ion, Nankin soils have C
nor`zons of stratified marine sediments. Ko!omoki soi}s are on stream
terraces and have C horizons that are sandy. Madison, Paco!pt, anO
Wedowee soils have so/a thinner than 40 inches and a thinner arS/!/ic
horizon. Nectar soils have an'R horizon of sandstone. Tumb|eton soils
are o: Southern Coastal P!ains up!a:os, formed in marine sediment and i:
addition have fraSme:is of chert or quartz grave! in the upper part, and
do not have C horizons of sapro|ite. With the exception of Hiwassee,
:one of the soils in the closely re!ated families have kandic hor:zons.
GEOeRAPHIC SETTING: Cecil soils are on nearly !evel to steep Pieomont
up!n:cl. S.npe gradients are 0 to 25 percent, most commoniy between 2
ano z5 percent. T:ese soi|s have deve;oped in wear:ered fe!sic
crystalline rocks. Average annual precipitation is ato:t 48 inches.
Mean annual soil temperature is acout 59 degrees F.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: in addition to the competing &pplinS,
Catau|a, Chestateev Cullen, Hiwassee, Madisonv Meck{ennurS, Paco|et, and
Wedowee series these are the D:rhamv Louisburg, Rion, and Worsham
series. Durham, Louisburg, and Rion soi\s contain less clay and Worsham
soils are poorly drained. In a6ditionv Louisburg soils have a
discontinuous arSi| |ic horizon.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: We!! drained; mediun: to rapid runoff; medium
internal drainage; moderate permeability.
USE AND VEGETATION: About half of the total acreage is in cultivation,
. with the remainder in pasture and forest. Common crops are small grains,
corn, cotton, and tobacco
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Piedmont area of Alabama, Georgia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and \/irSinia. The series /s of Urge e:tentx
with an area of more than 10,000x000 acres.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Cecil County, Maryland; 1899~
REMARKS: The June 1988 revision chanSed the c!ass ificat ion to Tvpic
KanhaPiudults and recognized the !ow activity clay properties of this
soil as defined in the Low Activity Clay Amendment to Soil Taxonomy,
August 1986.
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedo: are:
Ochric epippdon - the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of 11
inches.
Kardic horizon - the zone between 11 and 50 inches meets the !ow
activity clay requirement in more than 50 percent of the horizon.
ArSi!!ic horizon - the zone between 11 and 50 inches.
ADDITIONAL DATA: McCracken, R. J.r editor: Southern Cooperative Series
Bulletin 61, issued January, 1959, Virginia Agricultural Experiment
Station, Piacksn:rs, Virginia.
Soi ( Survey of Catawna County, North Car:.i:a, issupc 1975' Soil Survey

N a t ; r: r; a c: p e 7 e E --- i Su. e
U.S.A.

NC�JGiB SOIL INTERPRETATIONS RECORD CECILSERiES
MCLRA(S): 1-, 14$
REV. RAG ENH 10-91
C KkNHAPL:0.x.TS, CLAYEY, KAOLINI T TC,
0- CECIL SERIES MSIS'S OF VERY DEEP WEL`+ DRAINED !EARLY LEVEL TC M:'JDERATELY STEEP 63ILS ON PIES,-, LP A&.zs. TESE
SOILS F.AVE A SANDY LOAM SURFACE LAYER ABOUT 7 IViZES THICK. THE S iSS'1iL IS IYUMINAN?LY RLE-I) CLAY AND CLAY LOAD 43 '1.4c"Z6
THICK. T�E LncJLYING MATERIAL- IS K.;1L?IC"ir ORED, LOAMY SAS ILITE. OF F-SIC CRYSTALL I E RXK. SLOB RANGE FROM 0 TO 25
PERCENT.
LAZSCA"-C. A.'M CLIMATE PROPERTIES
kNICUPL AIR ;
FRE'ST FREE 1 ANNUAL ; ELEVATION : DRAINAGE :
SLO?E
TEM`-EPATLF-: ;
DAYS ; PRECIPITATION ; (FT) CLASS :
(PCT) ;
ESTI"A.'ED _IL(A)
!DEEP?H;
; ;FRACT.;FRACT.;PERCE T OF RATERIAL
LESS :CLAY ;
:(IN.): LEDA TEXTLE- UNIFIED ; AAS70 1>10 IN:3-!OIN: THAN 3` PAcI45 SIEVE NO.:
( :(PCT) ;(PCT) : 4 : 10 ; 40
; 200 ;IPCT);
0-7 ;SL,FSL,L
:Sl(,SC-SM ;A-21,A-4 ; 0-5 :84-100 80-100 6T-90
26-42 :5-20 1
4-T ;6R-SL,Sri -,f'-FSL
:SM, :A-2,A-1-B : : 5-15 160-95 5545 40-75
13-30 :5-20
0-7 :5CL,CL
:Sl~,SC,CL,)L :A-4,A-6 : : 0-5 :T5-100 75-100 68-95
38-81 :20-35:
:7-11 :SCL,CL
:Sm,SC,PL,CL :A-4,A-6 : 1 0-5 1T5-100 75-100 68-95
38-81 :20-35:
:II-50:CJCL
:!b{,bE,CH :A-7,A-5 : : 0-5 :97-100 92-100 72-99
55-95 :35-70'.
,50-75:VAR
:DEPTH:LIQUID 1PLAS- :
MOIST IBC : P@0 EA- : AYAILABLE 1 SOIL : SALINITY : SAR CEC : CACD3 I SYPSl 1
1(IN.): LIMIT :TICITY:
DENSITY : BILITY (WATER CAPACITY: REACTION 1 :
1
AG/CM3) : (IWHR) : (IN/IN) : (PH) :(MSS/CM): :(ME/1006): (PCT) : (PCT)
0-7 ; 15-30 : NP-7 :
1.30-1.50 : 2.0-6.0 : 0.12-0.14 1 4.5-6.5
0-7 : 15-Z2 : W-4 :
IAO-1;60 : 2.04.0 1 D.OT-0.O9 : 4.5-6.5
7 : 21-35 1 3-15 1
1.30-1.50 : 0.6 2.0 : 0.13-0.15 : 4.5-6.5 1 : : :
:
..1 : 21-35 : 3-15 :
1.30-1.50 : 0.6-2.0 : 0.13-0.15 : 4.5-5.5
:11-501 41-80 : 9-37 1
1.30-1.50 : 0.6-2.0 0.13-0.15 : 4.5-5.5
:50-75:
1DEPTri:OR&ANIC: SrftI16C-
: EROSION :ilIM� : iiItaT) : CORROSIYITY
:(IN.):RATTER 1 SELL
; FACTORS '.EROD.: EROD. :
1 (PCT) ',POTENTIAL', K : Kf: T :6ROUP.- INDE)(1 STEEL :CONCRETE:
: 0-7 :.5-2 : !OW
;.Z8:.Z8: 4 : 3 : 86 : _HISH : HI6m
1 0-7 : .5-2 : LEM
:.15;.28; 4 1 3 86
: 0-7 :.5-1 1 LOW
:.Z8:.28: 3 : 5 1 56
:7-11 1 : Lola'
:.28:.28:
FLOODING
: HI6( WATER TABLE : CDUTED PAN : BE)ROOK :SLMID-9U !HYI):PJTEh'T'L:
: DEPTH : KIND :M NT)'S ;DZ°TF::F(l6Ri)M1fESS:DE'i TH :!LkU?aS: TNIT.. TOTL;fie2=; 1. T
FREQUENCY : DURATICN" 1MFOk7HS : (FT) : 1 1 !iN): : (IN) ; 10N) :(IN) ; : ACTION ;
NONE
>6.0 ; : : ; : >60 : :
: B :

CECIL SERIES Ncoois
SANITARYFACILITIES(B)
MS`RJCTIC_N PATERik- (P)
I
:0-8%0�ZHU7E-PERCS S-04-Y
:0-15%-FA:R-LOB STPE!,�ZT4
:S:-FlT!.0 UNK
S_NLY,R_0PE
67RE?:STir,SL0PE
SORPTION
115-215X-SEVERE-SLDPE
ROADFL-L
FIELDS
FINS
LAGOON
',7-25%:SEVE!R-t-SLOPE
1
SAND
AREAS
D-SvOCIDERA71-TOO CLAYEY
:I"0BABdP-EXCESS FICES
SANITARY
S-IV/: PW_:-47E-SL0FlZE,T00 CLAYEY
LANYILL
115--ni :SFVF!-5LCPE
PAVE
i
(TRENCH)
:0-6*/,':SLIGHT
PY.6 -TOO CLAYEY
SANITARY
!8-15%:vOF_RATE-SLOPE
'.15-M.:P0DR-TLQ CLAYEY,SLOPE
LANDFILL
'. 15-Z5/:S_Prt-P&SLTr-
TOPSOIL
(AREA)
1
.0­8Y:FAIR-TO0 CLAYEY,HkRD TO PACY
DAILY
'8-15X:FAIR-TOO CLAYEY,HARD TO PACV,SLOPE
WATER MA EPIENT (P)
COVER FOR
:15-25%;W-SLOPE
'.0-3X:NODMATE-SEEPAGE
LANDFILL
1
POND
' .3-M-K&ERATE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE
1!
RESERVOIR
:e-2U.:SEVZ-RE-SNE
AREA
BUILDING SITE NVE-UlPff W
,0-8%iPUBATETOO CLAYEY
I,:
15EVERE-PIPIN6,HARI) TO PACK
RUOk
:9-15X:MODERATE-700 CLAYEEY,SLOPE
10BANKMENTS
AAVATIUNS
:15-MBEVERE-SLOPE
DIKES AND
LEVEES
i
SEVERE -ND KATER
DWELLINGS
'.8-15Y-N3DE!RAl!-&_0PE
EXCAVATED
1 WITHOUT
:15-2U.-.SEVM-SLOPE
11
PONDS
I
:.AWIFER FED
.0-8Y-.SLIGHT
'DEEP TO kATER
I DAFILINGS
!8-157,-.N0DERATE-SffE
I WITH
:15-257:SEVERE-SLOPE
I
DRAINAGE
A SDENT S
1
:0-4%-SLIGHT
0 -37SCL, C_ - F A V CPA , U
S%IALL
14-8'i.:MDE.RA7E-SL. OPE
ii
'CluSLIPE
I
COMERCIAL
',8-2147:SEVFtE-S_lRElc,
IRRIGATION' ILNING
i
BUILDINGS
:3-25XSL,FSL-,L,GR--c: 6R-L-.S_'0F_,S0' L ELOW-146'
:0-8Y-K-JFJ(ATE-LOW STRENGTH
'0-MCL,C,_-FAV0RAB_E
LOCAL
!8-15X:MODERATE-LO•ii SMNGTH,SLOPE
TERRACES
! 8-,^FASC LI, CL- SJPE
ROADS AND
'.15-25'/:SEV�E-SLOPE
I.
AND
FLOWING
STREETS
DIVERSIONS :8-Z57-5L,FL, L,GR-SL,Pr_':L- OPE,SOIL BLOW;I.Ni
LAAS,
10-8'/a-,FSL,L,SCL,CL:SLT6HT.
0-0.%: FAVORABLE
i
WDSCAPING :8-15YS'-,FSL,L,SD-,CL:rME-RATE-SLOPE
GRAM
:8-M5 -SLOPE
U) 90 -i F
:0-3%'S ; : M0DERA T E-SYA:.L STONES
NATERWAYS
FAIRWAYS
18-!5%GR:M_'!DERA'c-S,rALL STOE S,SLOPE
SLOPE

CECIL SERIES %cool°.
RECREATIM'AL D-_FF_LrP'SE!:? (E)
10- SL,FSL,L,cr.L,L" S'.Z`!rS
XF AREAS :0-8%5R:MODERATE-Sv;A-L STONES
::PLAY6RC ;hmS
:6-Z5'/SL,FSL,L,SrL,CL:S_=YE?.E-SL0 E :
_
:8-15'l..G :IEiD GATE-5_Q'E,S!�PLL STMS
::
;0-6/GR:St-VERE-SML,_ STMES
:15-M:5-SEVERE-SLOPE
::
:6-ZS/.�4: ERF-SLQ�E.SF"i� STMS
:
:0-M, FSL,,L,SCL,CL:SL.ICiT
::
:0-IM51I6.7
:
:8-15%S`,FSL,L,SCL,CL:PriDMATE-S-QPE
:: PATHS
:15-2 v.:MMRATE- E :
:PICNIC
AREAS:O-MR.MOD-ERATE-SULL STOLES
1: AND
:
:B-15XGR-MODERATE-SLOPE,SKALL STONES
:: TRAILS
:
115-MSEVERE-SLOPE
_ REMONAL IN'7ERPFETATIOS
CAPABILITY AND Y:ELDS PER AME 0; CROPS A,'(D PASWE (4I6H LEVEL MMAfic19a;
CLASS-
: CAPA- :CORN :COTTON :OATS
:50YEEPOlS
:TUEACCO
: - :PASTURE
DET, ERMiNING
: EILITY : :LINT :
:LE0FE PAY ;
;
PHASE
: :(BLD ,(LBS) :(BU)
.(BU)
!(LES)
MONS) :(AU!)
:NIRR:IFS.:NIRR 1IRR.:NIRR MR.:NIRR 1IRR.:NIRR :IRR.:NIkR
:IRR.
:EtiIRR 1IRR.:N:RR :IRR.
10-6% SL,FSL,L,6R
: ZE : : 95 1 : 750 : 1 90
: : 35 :
.12100 :
: 3.2 : : 8.0 :
1
:6-10% SL,FSL,L,GR
1 3E : : 90 : 1 700 : : 85
: : 30 :
12000 1
: 3.0 : : 7.5 1
1
.10-157 SL,FSL,L,6R
: 4E 1 : 80 : " : : 75
: : 25 1
:1900 :
1 2.6 1 ; 7.0 :
:15-25% SL,FSL,L,SR
: 6E : 1 70 : 1 500 : 1 60
: : 20 :
:1800 :
; 2.6 : : 5.5 :
12-6% SCL,CL,ERODED
: 3E : 1 70 1 1 300 : 1 70
1 : Z5 :
:
: 2.4 : : 5.5 1
1
:6-15% SCL,CL,ERODED
1 4E 1 : 60 : : 1 1 60
: : :.
: 1
: 2.2 : :Z.0 :
:
115-25X BCL,CLifRODED
: 6E 1 : 1 1 1
: 1 1
: 1.8 1 : 4.5 :
1
i1DODLA)m SUITABILITY (C)
1 CLASS-
:ORD: 'KANA6'IW. PRO&ERS
1 POTENMAL PROIUJCTIVITY
:
1 DETMININ6
:SYM:ER05'N:EQUIP.:SME .:i(INDTH:PLANT
: COP" TREES
:SITE:PROD: TREES TO PLANT
:
1 PHASE
1 :HAZARD:LINIT :fWT'Y:NAZARD:COMPET:
:INDX: CL.AS:
1
:0-15X SL,FSL,L,GR
MA',SLIEOT:S`IGHT:SLIG(T:SLIS'7:MDDER.:LO
LOLLY PINE
:83 18
:LBKOLLY PINE
:
.15-25% SL,FSL,L,6R
18R :YQ M.:fgDER.'.SLI6HT'.SLIOiT:NMR.:WTLEAF
PINE
:69 :8
:SHORTLEAF PINE
:
:YIREINIA PINE
:T1 :8
1
:
: : : : :
:it4iITE UK
179 :4
:NORTHERN RED OAK,
:81 14
:
1
:SOUTHERN RED OAK
:79 :4
1
1
;POST OAK
;7Z 14
1
1
:SCARLET OAK
181 14
:
:
Si=l a leek(
:76 :5
:
;
1
1 YELLOW POPLAR
192 :6
:0-15X SCL,CL,ERODED
17C
PINE
:7Z :7
:LMLOLLY PINE
:
115-2v: SCL,CL,ERODED
:7R :ZR.:MDDER.:KMr—R.:SLIGC:MAIDE'.:S::,DRTLEAF
PINE
:63 :7
:MTLEAF Pike
:
:VIRU IA PINE
:65 ;7
;
: : :
WITE OAK
:64 :3
1
1
'
'tLMT=R!' WD OAK

Cc-CIL SERIES NCOO.E
WINDBREAKS
a_Ac-, SPECIES S1EC-E° .?T;
SCiE :NT'
WILDLIFE HABITAT SUiTAF..ILITY (D)
CLASS- : POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS
POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR:
DETAINING :GAIN UExPM 9: NILD :HARD0 :CON IFER:Sfw Mi
3E--TLAQ54A:l.OW UVU- :bWI?_D :IET:JNDUNSELD:
PHASI SEQ- :LEGUME HERE.: TRES :PLAN'TS
:PLA%fTS : kATE2 '.WILDLF WI ILF 'WILDLF :WILDLF
:O-6X SL,FSL,L,C :M :600D :GOOD :600D :GOOD :
:V. POOR: V. POO BOOD 1.SM
:V. POOF::
:
:6-15:: !L FSL,L,R— :FAIR :0M :GOOD :60-3 :GOOD :
W. PCQR:V. F-30R;C-C%3 !WID
W. Di!R:
:
,15._225".. S-,PS:L,L, &R .F"DR 'FAIR 50JDGO„D ,, GOOD
!V. PC;T, V. POO : FAIR ,GJa
:V. PL3R:
:
:0-6a: SCL,CL,ERODED :FAIR :GOOD :GOOD :GMD :GOOD :
:V. POOR:V. POOR: GOLD !600D
:V. FTjDR:
:
:6-157. SU-,CL,ERODED :PAD R :FAIR :FAIR :FAIR :FAIR :
W. POOR! V. POOR:FAIR :FAIR
:V. POOR:
:
:15-05X SCL.CL.ERODED W. POOR:POORR :FAIR :FAIR :FAIR :
:V. POOR! V. POOR! POOR :FAIR
:V. POOR:
:
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT C"LNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
: PLANT : PERCEATAE COMPOSTION (DRY (EIfisT) BY CLASS DrsERX-INING
PHASE
:
: COMMON PLANT NAME ; SYMBOL
UESPN)
:WITC*sAZ-- ;HAVI4
.FLOiERING DOGWOOD :COFL2
:AMERICAN HDLLY :ILOP :
.PAWAW :ASTR
:FARr.L� SYAAR
RISCADIME BRAPE 4YIR03
&IAC
IP1AfLE B`EBAL.K 1MORU ; :
; :
;
;
-�.ACKBERRY :RUBUS ; I-
:PERSIM4MOM!
:GOlkIOD SOXAR
:BLACK CHERRY IPRSEZ : :
: :
;
:
.EAST —ERN
'AMER ICAN PLUM1 :PRAMS ;
: COM1M TRUKPETCREE°Ji : CARAZ
: POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY kT):
:
: FAVORABLE YEARS
' SISAL YEARS
: LWAVORABLE YEARS
FOOTNOTES
A ESTIKATES OF EHGIhM- INE PFWERTIES BASED ON TEST DATA OF 11 PEDONS
IN NORTH CAROLINA, EE9RGIA, AAA SOUTO CAROLIhA.
A ADDITIONAL ALLOKeE LWFIED ENTRIES ARE: LICE, 03, WCL-ME,S�-SC.
B RATINGS BASED ON N&�, PART 603, 7-83.
C RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MA'a)AL, 9/80.
D WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMKRAND°.,-T4, JAI 19T2.
*+iTeIS IS A RATING OVERRU . SEE TrE INTERPRETATION, OVEP,RIDE FiLE FOR AN E1L°LANATION 0= THIS OYERRiDE.

CONGAREE

LOCATION CONGAREE SC+AL AR F:._. GA MD NC PA TN VA
Established Series
Rev. ENS
CONGAREE SERIES
The Congaree series consists of deer:, we i l to moderate i y we i I drained,
moderately permeable loamy soils that formed in f l uv i a 1 sediments.
Slopes range from. 0 to 4 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy, mixed, nonac . _ , thermic 7y p i c Ud i f l uvents
�.
TYPICAL rED_ ,. C:o. S-•"Ee loam--cuitivare:= (C:omrs are
for moist s i 1 tin { ess otherwi Se stated.)
Ap--O to 8 1 nches; dark brawn (7.5Y^n 4/4) 1 oam; weak: f ine gr-anuI ar"
structure; friable; many fine roots; common wor mcasts; many fine f i ak:es
of mica; stronj : y acid; clear smooth bouncar"y. (5 to lei inches thick:)
C1--8 to 18 inches; dart: brown (10YR 4/2) loam; massive; friable;
many fine roots; many fine pares; few warmcasts; :zany fine flakes of
mica; medium acid; gradual wavy boundary. (7 to 20 inches thick)
CS--18 to 22 inches; dark brown (10YR g:/G) loam; massive; friable;
marry fine roots; few fine sores; few warmcasts; common 1/4 inch
horizontal lenses of 1 i Sht yellowish brown loamy fine sand; few fine
fVakes of mica; medium acid; clear smooth boundary. (2 to 20 inches
thick)
CS- to S2 i riches; dark brown ( !OYR 3/3) very f i ne sandy I oam;
massive; friable; many fine roots; many fine pores; marry fine flakes of
mica; few thin lenses of loamy fine sand; few fine fragments of
charcoal; medium acid; diffuse wavy boundary. (5 to 20 inches thick)
Ab- to TS inches; very dark grayish brown (10YR /2) loam; weak:
f i ne Sranu i or structure; fr i ab I e; many f i ne roots; many f i ne pores; few
warmcasts; many fine flakes of mica; medium acid; gradual wavy bounaary.
(0 to 8 inches thick)
Pb--38 to 62 inches; brown (7.5YR 4/4) silty c i ay loam; moderate
coarse Fir i smat i c and suban3ui or b 1 ocky structure; f r iab 1 e; few f i ne
roots; many f i ne and medium pores; few faint s i it coatings on vertical
Feed faces; common fine fiahes of mica; medium acid; gradual smooth
boundary. (0 to 0 inches thick)
C:4--62 to 80 inches; mottled strong :gown (7.5YR F/ :) , brown ( 0YR
5/ ') and pale brown (!CYR 6/3) clay loam; massive; friable; common fine
flakes of mica; common 1 to _ mm. very dark: brown and b i ack: concretions;
strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Richland County, South Carolina, 2-1/2 miles south of
Farmers Market, 1/2.:rile east of Congaree River, on Congaree River fKod
p i a i n, 0.8 mile north of Burwell Mann : n grain drier and storage
an facility, 100 feet east of field road.
RANGE IN WARAC ,SZISTIC:S: Depth to becrock commonly ly is more than 10
f eet . The so'i 1 . S very Strong I y ac i d zo neutr a 1 throughout Dut some
part of the contr o i section lias a huh of 5.5 or higher. T n i n strata of

PAGE 02
contrast i, o textures are in the C. horizon. Most pedOMS haVe few to many
flakes of mica. Content of coarse fragments commonly is less teat:
percent by vo i ume . Content of organic matter is erratic with depth and
buried horizons commonly below a depths of 24 inches.
The Al or Are horizon has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value of L to 5, and chroma
of 2 to r_.. Where the value is i ess than c .5, and Al or Ap nor ; zon is
less than G inches thick. The A horizon is loam, silt loam, sandy loam,
or fine sandy loam.
The C horizon, to a depth of 20 inches or more, has hue of 5YR to 10YR,
value of S _ o _ , and cnroma of = to 6. Mottles in smades of r-ei_ , Drown,
or ye l i ow are in some pedons. Below a depth of 20 inches to a depth of
about 50 inches, colors are similar to the upper fart of the C horizon;
however, some pedons have Mott i es of chroma 2 or less. Below about 50
Inches, the color ra.ngeo from brawn to gray, coFrmon l y with contrasting
mottles. Texture of the particle -size control section is silty clay
loam, fine sandy loam, or loam commonly with strata of sandier or more
clayey material. Below a depth of 40 inches, the texture is variable,
ranging from loamy sand to silty clay.
COMPETING SERIES: There are no other- known series in this family.
Similar sails in other- families are the Bunyan, Cascilla, Dela,
MorSanf i e l d, Neubert, Norwood, Cich l ockonee, Riverview, Rob i nsonv i l l e,
Starr, and Toccoa series. Bunyan soils are neutral to alkaline in some
part of the 10 to 40 inch control section. CasciIla, Morganfield, and
Norwood soils have less than 15 percent fine and coarser sand in the 10
to 40 inch control section. Neubert soils have siliceous mineraio5Y.
De l a, Cich i ocl-konee, Rob i nsonv i I le, and Toccoa so i Is contain 8 to 11;
percent clay in the 10- to 40-inch control section. Riverview soils are
more acid and have a cam.b i c horizon. Starr soils have a dark red to
strong brown camb i c horizon.
GEOGRAPHIC- SETTING: Congaree soils are on flood plains or at base of
stapes. Slopes range from 0 to 4 percent. The soil formed in loamy
alluvium, 2 to 6 feet thick. Near- the type location, the average annual
temperature is 64 degrees R., the annual precipitation is 44 inches, and
the freeze -free growing season is 217 days.
GEiIGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the similar Starr and Toccoa
series, and the Aitavista, Augusta, Buncombe, C:artecay, Chewacla. State,
and Wehadkee series. Altavista, Augusta, and State soils have an
arg i I l i c horizon. Buncombe so i i s, to a depth of 40 inches, are sane' or
loamy sand. Gartecay soils have less than 1S percent clay in the 10- to
40-inch control section and they have matt i es of 2 or lower chroma
within 20 inches of the surface. C:hewac l a and kehadikee soils have a
camb i c horizon. In addition, C:hewac l a stir i l s have mottles a' 2 or lower
chroma within 20 inches of tare surface, and Wehadkee soils are
dominantly gray.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEADILITY: Weil- to moderately we i l drained; slaw
surface runoff; macerate permeability. These soils flood for brief
periods, during winter or spring.
USE AND VEGETATION! Most areas have been cleared and are use; for
growing corn, stela i l grain, vegetables, pasture, and lay. Nat .ve
vegetation is oak, hickory, Suer, poplar, and l ob i o l i y pine.

PAGE 0 =:
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Alabama Georia. Maryanc, North Carolina,
South Carolina, and Viremia. The series is Patens i ve.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Orangeburg County, South Carolina; 1904.
REMARKS: Diagnostic features recognized in this peg: _ n are:
Ochr- i s ep i redo( — 0 to 8 inches
Stratification and irregular- distribution of 04 — 10 to 40 inches
: 'c:.t I fi;';a ! Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

S0U64 C0IL INTER'rRETAT10k5 RECGR;� C'-'5r',=FcSFS:cS
X!LRA (S) : ,. 1::A, -::E., 145, i 47
i' V D.!-,' 1-9c
E'ciS, Fi3E-LC A. Y, M:)w, s'1AC:J, TF,,E=:":C
RISE --,.1 C•cE A ;= v= =, T=C� ..:= .. -E :x�Avu SA ILS 0% FL:=:% F-A:15. c= E�"c�_ -E c: =AC= '+�_ .E EAR
r •�r { LVA, 7LXY!,%' KA?=R L, i4 : �4 �1Cc ..:C s , :S 1.4 .17CrES i„ DA�'v EZ.4 i OM; 10
OF DARK L-' iA% dE;Y FIKE SANDY LCA.=. 6 INCHSS :1= VERY DA,:: g: AY-c_ t= LEi ,= ^ E-! L ; n,
' rt J KOTT' LED rF s TO 2r^T� f`_ C•. 'F r"_;�
1, � L.at=S A=, � : S c L�., C~AY :.�•f,. A 1,�:... \- �Q .�.. 'S.
"A.
-_ T.
A.11;-,-1UAL AIR ;:CST ;:AL : `EiEbA?::'�� F:'r= _ ` '
Ate �,: vn 1
sA EDcc� --• - __ r
I:::AC:r MAT :A:. =3 CLAY
:(I.N.) USDA TEXTLK- : UNIFIED W--70 :}1Q k: 10IN: =Ati '•" FA. SIRS IRT ti^.:
1 T o_� 1. C C � r��_ff. f
1Q 40 2F , : (FU
0-8 :Fv`,SL : ,SC-S :A-2,A-4 : 0 : 0 195-1.00 95. lV- 20-50 :5-15
0-E .1L,SIL 4L,',:-,C :A-4 : 0 : 0 :95-100 95-100 TO-100 51-90 :10-25;
;S-,n :SiCL,FSL,L :s,M`,C1_,S,^ 3-4,A-6,A-7 : 0 : 0 ;95 100 95-1.00 70-100 40-90 :::-'.6
:E2-801VAR
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
:If r TH LIQUID :FLAS- : X IST FOLK : P !'`A- : AVAILABLE : KiiL : SALIN74TY : SAZ : C`C : CACvG3 : E P&A- :
LIMIT :TICITY: DENSITY : BILITY :WE'( WACITY: F ACTION
:IND-a : (5/Cr2) : ('ANIri) : (ANIIN) : (°=) 1.WiTHns!Cr:); :(VE/1008): (PCT) : (PC?) :
. " 3 : 15-30 : N?-7 : 1.30-1.60 : 0.6-5.0 : 0.12-0.IE : 4.5-7.3 5-12 : t
20-35 : 3-10 : 1.20-1.40 : 0.6-2.0 : 0.112-0.20 : 4.5-7.3 : : 6-15
:6-6: 25-50 : 3-Z : I.2O-1.5':; : 0.6-2.0 : 0.2-0.20 4.5-7.3
1 "1 r r- r r.. 1.
,1'}-2F'T;,ICkivAtilG S,'�?Ik�;- 1 z�iCSiC�s ,KIND , kitu� CG-;�+L51bITY :
r �1 1 r,-�n r [,; 1 r-rw� r^R.1 1 �.�n 1 1
1 iii. } IPATT, R 1 SILL 1 FAMM •I,_• .CR�•D. 1 FROD. .
1 I 1('�;� 1 Rrt F: 1 1 nr�� RF I
1 1 (FCT) Ir1,:?E\?IAL 't; K; IB-uJ: i4i)EX 1 S'L= Iti'"tiC;z�•-
: i-3 : LN. :.24:.24: 5 : 3 : E6 :KC�FRATE:Ir"TERA I
0-E : 1-4 : LC}:l :.3T;.37: 5 : 6 ; 4S
10-iQ 1 1-3 1 1 .571 3 , 1 1
I V .w 1 v . LCR4 1. �• 1 1 .3T: , ,
:62-5:0:
1 1 1 r 1
1 1 1 1 r 1
1 1 1 1 1
: FLC4DIk8 : i'i : aA?ER TA r : C;'.E1 -•AK ' E.rnr,Cir.. Ic .r_.DEN-EZ
KI :- '.DEF'' `::A7,; x"Q31,L_-?�,
F=:= Lwtir"Y D ^A?iO'ti :14ZIN7Fc 1 (FT) 1 ('M ' ('k} ' :(i,) r,I%I ;:% I
:60

CONGAHE —SERIES SECO"':64
C7
-C 'rk%-'�'
TO-Y 3N:L—zV
F E —D CC
NONE, RA�E:
G WE T NE E—S
LASO'A
SAO
PEAS
-ZETINESS
7
(7
ll-c;R' AR7 S E- VE ,E - Z 6 S
I,
:CA7"N-730 CLAYEY
S.k.NTTA'Y
LAND -FILL
TIM-71 L
I
(AFKA)
'FAIR -TOO CLAYEZY,CETNESS
DAILY
WAM-1 V..A.N'AG=-?Z-.NT UP;
COVER FOR
—E 1. :0-3'/: fQDEW E-S=OA
LANDFILL
I
-4%:rOM-E-SMPAF-A- OFS
.j
AREA
K.11,_DTNC ISIT-t DC'r CN-
FE
I KRIEK-IFT-OM
MWAGNOMODE�A—m-XE—, NESK , F T Q
MAN,72%7. S
EXCAVATI M
DiEs klo
:r TE-D To fC-r-j!l
DKFiLINE
RARE, MrN':
EXCAVAME
WITHWIT
PIDINDS
QJ i FER FED
WE. KDDERA7-E-iETZSS
WE: FAVGR�lz
C- CE
DU 1 N AS
pir.
EASEMEN75
0
.S_.
:fC.t,.L. TGF
SMALL
Can�n.%
'L:L
a? A:
, hl"r i a
ilkS
--
LY -S2.
R.A:":-: m2.!% A 7 - C� q'7-ZN27*�-,, L: -n
... DD
=C C =LC-. V 47
002 A;",'L
k.
AQ
C
kN7"- K-i-F
FFFEE4: SE V -Z DIN2

CDNGAR:-:E
T %it'
INON-E, :Ll E7:1
:kn,
TRAILS'
CAc:'AP7iLITY A'N';l-Y7.ELDS
FEZ Ci:: AND
CAPA- CORN'
S.", v RC S :0A'7S B km-: A -'Y;.' A Ss :7,XFFKL':'ED
i
NT
EIT: T-
DAG'R.
PHASE
RL;
Mj)
(Au*.) 1 (00
N7u -'T7, I--
:TR :N7RR '' : 7•:, � :N ,
Na',F-,URE,
OCCASS
45 K
i 9 i 0
FREQ
1140
40 75
9 0
"'MAND 6: !TT 7:
T V
•FL-'
CLASS-
C: XA'AEwE%7 FK :
TTV.-71AL rDX
y
D N2
Syrj: nr"S N: 1 7p.!
E-Qj,
S=-
:L_ .1 k T tC -Ir : PLAN7
..n
CD "MID T, FEES E I —It i P R. 0 � �, —IRFIS TVM PLA%71
PHASE
:�-b U7U,11MIT
'MO RTY: L.ADRD: INN; CLAS:
ALL
:I OA: M T .OD=l C :V,2,D-7 RLI j&j'
I —'00
.;SiSej !0 LCLLY P7,
:YELLN-POPLAR :1.07 8 SZ-7i GJX
YELLN-FOR-AR GA." :107 :12
ZFM—T SYAY-
IL-C-7E=.-- 7
' EAST. E%%:10
W2ERTICAN' SYCA!3RE ;89 :7 :C;'OMTC,-, Ok,
t. :LAC
S A Z-': F7 OAK -Opv 6:
D4 OAK :95 :6
',VERICAN PZEC

ii-C:c-•_k-;S
xT. DL'== c:,ITC,-: I-Y (D)
1 FOR- '
CLAW- : P4;=n aL FO-'; ^Ar:TAI EL=I,&7S1 Fu ':?:AL AS r,Fu•:T�,i r.,
iCILDRE.
: C �:'� i S'r' ; S-=:ii:• � ice. i iA�i , :.Ai.."fr: ; � � Ste:
..--^• L. jy= . E THLE_-.! ;�,. (. ter, , '=�A:,TS i kV:E :4:LD,- :WID, :X:D: :A:�GLr :
^-.-:n r- -:
- — ---
1
1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1
Ti- L �: TT,f ! nr T R ES I :'ST V
fuTE'�,:A� 11AT:L= LA`' G�ka:�:i (A:i�r—ANu L"� Fil==..1 :1��..�;ih:, tt`S7A':CF0
PLANT : PE'RMNTA- Cv'"'FL`1z iC:t (DRY iE.) BY CiAAc
: Ca' Vi PLAN-; WE : SY1 : ALL
: (K-SN) :
LITTLE B LSTEM :scsc : ZZ/ :
:PANIC M ;PA,4iC : 6
:BEA,'!E, PAgICJ;y :PAAk : 19
:PIt A.'�'D ?.L=Z`WN' ;AR�SVT1f
1 LES-EA ! LE& E u �
S•-:::;S : SSA : 6
ZR AWX GRAM ICS ; AAA
PO-
1 ^'^TI&N (LP-C./Av. DRY k?):
FAYLRCLE YEARS : Zi50 : ! 1 1 !
: NOZ A L YECS : I v00 :
: U":=AVCRAP. P. YEAR'S : 1450
FDOT N ZES
A EST.:.'= Etiu. P OPEzT.ES BASED C� .EST DATA � 3 P °tE F�Ck* S::, 0.r, AZ GA.
E RATiABS BASED ON 1tS-, PART 60-3, JLLLY In?.
C $03"1D-AND RAT7.k;3 BASED Cti NF?�, S=''T 19'K.
D WIDLI=- RATik66 BASW ON SDILS rZKO AQUI-ri 74, JA%;, 107.2.

GASTON

LOCATION GASTi N lqC
Established Series
Rev. WEW: AG
/ 8 '=1
GASTON SERIES
The Gaston series consists of very deep, we i I drained, moderately
permeable soils on ridges and side slopes of the Pcecmont uplands. They
formed in residuum weathered from mixed intermediate and maf i c
crystalline rock such as hornbiende, gneiss, quartz diorite, gabbro, and
hornbiende schist. Slope ranges from 2 to 25 percent. Mean annual
temperature is 59 degrees F. and meat: annual precipitation is 48 inches
near the type location.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Clayey, mixed � � t � y, , t er�iiiC Yu�i:iC arlu��u1 5
TYPICAL PEDC iN: Gaston sandy clay loam --cultivated. (Colors are for -
moist soil unless otherwise stated).
Ap--O to 6 inches; dark: reddish brown (5YR 3/4), yellowish red (5YR
5/4) dry, sandy clay loam; wear medium granular structure; friable; many
fine roots; slightly acid; clear smooth boundary. (3 to iG inches
thick)
rt1--6 to 14 inches; dark red (2.5YR 3/6) clay; moderate medium
subangular blocky structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine and few
medium mots; common d i st i npt clay f i Ims on faces of peds; few black:
streaks; moderately. acid; gradual wavy boundary. (5 to 38 inches thick)
W2t 14 to 47 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) ciay; few medium distinct
reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/8) mottles; moderate medium subangular blocky
structure; firm; sticky, plastic; common fine roots; common distinct
clay films on faces of peds; few fine flakes of m i ca; few black streaks;
moderately acid; clear- wavy boundary. (10 to 45 inches thick)
EC--47 to 57 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loam; common medium
prom i nent redd i sh ye I I ow (7.5YR 6/8) rnott I es; weak med i urn subangu I ar-
blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common
f i ne f lakes of mica; few pockets of weathered black minerals; moderately
acid; clear wavy boundary. (O to 24 inches thick)
C: 57 to 72 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6), yellowish red (5YR 5/6), any::
yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) saproIito that has a Ioarn texture; rock:
controlled structure; common black specks and streaks; common fine
flakes of mica; moderately acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Gaston County, North Carolina; 5 miles south of Belmont
on NC: Highway 272; 0.9 rn i I e south on State Road 2525; 500 feet south or:
field road, 250 feet west of road.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Sol urn thickness is 40 to more than 60 inches.
Depth to bedrock is greater. than 6 feet. The soil ranges from strongly
acid through s I i gnt ly acid. Most pedons have few to common flakes of
mica in the E. horizon and few to many f lakes of mica in the BC: and C:
horizons.
The A or Ap horizons have hue of 2.5YR to 7.5YR, value of less than 4,

PAGE 02
and cnr ma of = to 6. The A horizon, where present, is at least
r-',
inches thick:. It is loam, fine sancy loam, sandy clay loam, clay loam,
or gravelly analogues of these textures.
The Lit horizon has hue of IOR or 2.5YR, value of 3 or 4, and chroma of 4
to 8 when moist. Dry value less than 5 that is no more than 1 unit
higher- that, the moist value is restricted to the upper subhor i zons of
the Bt horizon. High cnr-oma mottles and dark streaks or stains occur- in
most pedons. It is clay or clay loam.
The BC horizon, if present, has hue of 2.5YR or 5YR, value of 4 to 6,
and chroma. of 4 to 8. High chroma mottles and dart; streaks or stains
occur in most pedons. it is clay loam, sandy clay loam, or loam.
The C horizon is commonly multicolored in shaves of red, yellow, and
brown. It is sapr-oiito weathered from mixed acid and basic crystalline
rock that has loamy textures.
COMPETING SERIES: The Farragut series is the only ether- known series in
the same family. Farragut soils have textures of silty clay, silty clay
loam, or clay in the Bt horizon and are formed from a thin layer- of
colluvium over shale residuum. Series in closely related families are
the Cecil, Clifton, Coronaca, Cullen, Davidson, Georgevilie, Gwinnett,
Hanceville, Hiwassee, Madison, Mecklenburg, Pacolet, Stoneville, and
Tatum series. Cecil, Coronaca, Davidson, Geor-geville, Gwinnett,
Hiwassee, Madison, and Pacolet soi is are. kaol initic. In addition Cecil,
Geor-gevilie, Madison, and Pacolet soils do not have horizons with moist
value less than A. Madison sails have a high content of mica flakes.
Pacolet soils have thinner clayey horizons. Coronaca soils are less
acid. Coronaca, Davidson, Gwinnett, and Hiwassee sails have rhodic
colors throughout or in the upper- meter- of the al-g i I 1 i c horizon. Cullen
soils do not have A horizons as thick as 6 inches that have moist value
less than S.5. Hanceville and Stoneville soils have rhodic colors
throughout the argiliic horizon and have formed in residuum weathered
from sedimentary rock:. Clifton, Mecklenburg, and Tatum soils do not
have A horizons thicker than 6 inches that have moist value less than 4.
Clifton so i i s are mes i c . Mecklenburg so i I s are less acid and have slow
permeability. Tatum soils have formed in sericite schist or phyilite.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Gaston soils are on gently sloping to moderately
steep uplands of the Piedmont plateau. Slope gradients are dominantly 22
to 15 percent but range from 2 to 25 percent. These soils formed in
residuum weathered from mixed basic and acidic crystalline rocks such as
quartz diorite, granite, gabbro, hornblende gneiss, rnafic gneiss, and
hornblende schist. Near the type location, average annual precipitation
is about 48 inches. Mean annual temperature is about 59 degrees F.
GEiGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Cecil,
Cullen Davidson, Gwinnett, Hiwassee, Madison, Meck:lent,urg, and Pacolet
series, are Enon, Helena, Ir-ede I I , Sedgef i e l d, and Worsham series.
Cecil, Cullen, Davidson, Gwinnett, Hiwassee, Madison, Mecklenburg, and
Pacolet soils occur- in the same landscape positions as Gaston soils.
Enon, Helena, I r-ede I I , and Sedgefield soils are on toe s i apes OR THE
smoother- parts of ridges. In addition, Enon, Helena, Ir-edell, and
Sedgefield sails have yellower hue and Helena, Iredeil, and Sedgefield
soils have low chroma mottles in the B horizon. in a0d i t i an, Irece 1 I
so i l s are montmor i l l inn i t i c. Worsham so i Is have dominant chroma of 2 or
less and are in depressions and along intermittent drains.

PAGE i>_;
DRAINAGE AND PE-MEABILITY: ;tieII drainers, medium to rapid runoff, medium
internal drainage, and moderate permeacility.
USE AND VEGETATION: More than half of tke acreage is in cultivation or -
pasture with the remainder in forest. Crops include small grains, corn,
soybeans, and pasture plants. In forested areas shortleaf pine,
IobIolly pine, Virginia pine, hickory, northern red oak, southern red
oak, scarlet oak, red maple, black oak, eastern white pine, yeilow-
poplar, white oak, and sweetgum are common trees. The understory
includes flowering dogwood, grape, sourwood, common trumpet creeper,
whitchhazel, common persimmon, winged elm, eastern redbus, eastern
redcedar, sassafras, eastern hophornbeam, and American holiy.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Piedmont areas of North Carolina and possibly
Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and Virginia. The series is of large
extent.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Gaston County, North Carolina; 1985.
REMARKS: This series was formerly included with Cullen series and
originally fitted in the concept of the Lloyd series in North Carolina.
The large acreage (25,000 acres in Gaston and Lincoln Cos., NC) of soil
similar to Cullen but having dark: surface layers with moist value less
than 3.5 and dry value less than 6 in the Ap horizon supports proposal
of this series.
Diagnostic horizons recognized in this pedon are: -
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of E•
inches (Ap horizon).
Arg i I l i c horizon - the zone from a depth: of 6 inches to a depths of 47
inches (Btl and Bt2 horizons).
ADDITIONAL DATA: (NC State University)
Apparent CEC B.S. Pedon Horizon
Depth (in.) Me/100g clay percent
1 B t 2 8- 23 53.5 1 P.C- 5? - 60
6.2 2 Elt1 10 - 24 51.8 Z C
55 - 60 3.9 3 Bt 6 -
2't
50 2 EC; 55 - 60 2.7 4 B t l
7 - E3.7 5 Et 1 i':= - 24 3P, . e.
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

NC1?D SOIL I I_.;1 ", . 10N6 RECC'RD EAS?:k�S`=;TES
X-RA(S'7: i36
REV.
H;'(1C HA=`L;n„tTS, CLAYE"'TXa, TH;IC,
FE GAo'tuti SERIEB C 7ti5i S if= i LL Iql,Ik L NEAR -Y �v�� TO FOD� ATZLY EE ' ILS ON P: w�iT (;, LA:3;S. TH v Fib � Ik
MATERIAL WEATiG cD FRO" i%;� IA'E A� 1�AFIC CRYS-ALLItcE itJCK. TYPICALLY ? i-=- SUIF;FACE LAYER iS DARK REDDISH ERWN Spdo"Y
r^ T.. � : �:�-. n
CLAY LOAM, 5 ItiC;-iE5 ' iC�:. TrE S �.S��IL IS Ii�N �a t-ICE.. IT S l A;;i; R.-�J CLAY IN 7r7 UP - PA=;?, RED CLAY IN T; KIDDIE
PART, AND RED C"SAY L00 Ih T� LEER PART. T -- LK ERiYlli }�A LR:AL 70 A D"'� ;h ?E Iti .— IS ?�u, Y. L! Cris^; REED, AND
YELLCfAlIS; BRO�,N' SAr^iOLITE T-,AT HAS A LOAM TEXTiiRE. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 25 PE.;CE;ri.
LA10SCAPE A;D CLIM;AT PROPERTiE;
1 A`r AL AIR (
ROST F4LE ANNUAL 1 ELEVATION 1. DRAiNA --
DAYS 1 F'^ECIPITATl5N ( (FT) CLASS i
(PCT)
5
ESTIKATED SCI.iL K0 'TiE6 (A)
)DEPTH
( :FRACT.:FRACT.:PEPMliT OF MA --R!AL
LESS :CLAY
;(IN.): USDA =j LEE : UNIFIED : AAS; O 1>10 IN:3-107N: THAN 3' PASSING SIEVE K.j.: :
1(PCT) ;(PCT) : 4 : 10 : 40
: 200 :(PC?):
:. 0-6 :L,FS-
;SM,1rL,CL-M�. :A-2,A-4 : : 0-5 :90-100 84-100 80-95
30-75 :15-27:
: 0-6 :CL,SCL
:CL,SC,SM,ML :A-4,A-6,A-7-6 : : 0-5 190-100 84-100 75-95
36-75 :20-40;
16-47 :C,CL
-CL,CH,ML,w, .A-7 : ; 0-5 :95-100 90-100 80-99
65-90 135-70:
:47-57:CL,SCL,L
:CL,SC :A-4,A-6,A-7 : : 0-5 :90-100 64-100 75-98
36-75 :20-45:
'57-721VAR
:DEPTHILIQUID :PLAS- I
MOIST ILK : A- : AVAILABLE : SOIL : SALINITY : SAR : CEC : CAM : GYPSUM :
:(IN.); LIKIT :TICITY:
FENSITY 1 SILITY ;WATER CAPACITY: EAMON
I : IINDEX :
(6/02) : (IN/HR) I (IN/IN) I (PH) I(K /CM); :(FIE/1006): (PCT) : (PCT) :
: 0-6 : Z540 : W-7 :
1.20-1.50 1 2.0-6.0 : 0.14-0.18 : 5.1-7.3
: 0-b : 3rJ-50 : 5-20 :
1.30-1.60 : 0.6-2.0 : 0.12-0.16 : 5.1-7.3
:b-47 : 40- :12-57 :
1.30-1.60 : 0.6-2.0 : 0.12-0.16 : 4.5-6.5
147-57; 25-50 : 7-23 :
1.30-1.60 : 0.6-2.0 : 0.10-0.15 : 4.5-6.5
57-7,!
IDEPTHIORGAbIC: SHRINK-
; EROSION :WIND 1 WIND : CORROSIVITY :
:(IN.):KATTER : Skc l
: FACTM :EROD., EROD.: :
: (PCT) :POTENTIAL; K : M' T ;(i:iOUP I((D-J( : STEEL :CO!NC' TE:
0-6 ; .5-3 I LOB!
:.32:.32; 4 I 6 : 48 : HIGH 1*30RATE:
: 0-6 ; .5-3 I LN}
:.Z8:.281 4 : 6 48 1
:6-47 : :MODERATE
:.24:.24: 1 : I
.47-57: 1 LOW
,.28 .28:
.57 ry,
1 FLOODING
; HIS kATErR TABLE : CEP-=N7ED PAN ; BEDROC:; :SJcSIK NC-- :HYD:PG'TE:T'L:
DEPTH ; KIND :K%TtLc :D-EPTL;F(AiiDN= ;DEPTH ;iiAPt? ;ItiiT.:TOTAL:F°^: FRCGT :
: FrFQLLPJCY : DLPATiL
11 NTHS : (F) : : : tIk): : (Ik) : :(IN) :(IN)
: : ACTION ;
: NON` :
; : >6.0 1 : ; : ; >60 1 ;
: C ; :

GASTON SERIES NC0170
SAAiTA=;Y FACILITIES (A) CiI STRUCTION trA RTI L (A)
ii��;ATE-PE3CS 5L0siLY
:SE, -IC TANS;
�$-i5%:" �;~�w- .ERGS S. LY,5L0'E
) )
1 &FP �y�
1 i.:., 1:.11\
11F,_?F• .0 E ✓C- OP
1 e_..%..rr i:.+.- 5�1i t
: FIELDS
1
I
i
1
1
11
11
11
11
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
I 1
1 Ilr Ir�LAuLt�t/..irvJ i
1 E 1
1 J�AEc
, "l- -SE '' r-�c C'
1� 7%;F.CD� .ATE „UEFA. E SLOPE
LAM'
:7-25i::S-2®r -SLOPE
:: SAND
: AREAS
1
1
11
1 1
CLAYEY
::
:Ili='nJEAcLE-EX;cSS Fi!cS
:. SANITARY
:15-2*-SEVERE-S`O='E,TOO CLAYEY
LANDFILL
)
:: GRAVEL
: )
:4-S'/.;SLIG'T
1:
:0-15%:F"�3R-T3, i AY"cY
SANITARY
:8-15{:rjD-RATE-SLOPE
11
115_25 I „+0 1 S: r-•E ,
: LANDFILL
:15-25%:SEb':�-E-SLOPE
:: TO:`SGIL
(AREA)
1
1
:
1
1
11
11
1 1
1 1
:0-15i::POOJ-TOO CLAYEY,HARD TO PACK
DAILY
:15-257:Pi OR -TOO CLAYEY,HARD TO PACK,SLOPE
::
NATER NANAGEENJ (A)
;. COVER FOR
:
::
:0-37; D-BATE-SEEPAE :
: LANDFILL
:3-E'/.:MOD-ERA'E-SEEPA:-.,SLO?E :
RESERVOIR
:8-25X:SEMz--SLix=E :
11 /LT�LII �R A
1 ,
BJILDINS SITE DC VELONT (A)
:
:0-8% MMMATE-TOO CLAYEY
::
;SEVERE-M TO PACK :
: SHALLOW
:8-15%:)uD:-"4TE-TOO CLAYt-Y,SLOPE
EMBANVYIENTS
:EXCAVATIONS
:15-25X:SEVERE----SL0
:: DIKES AND
1
1
1
1
11
11 LC6—i�5
11
1 1
, 1
I 1
', Sr V3�-{t':i kATER :
1. DWELLINGS
' '
�r-1J>.:!!✓DG,A:t-J:dr.l r,
:c` F' ' c ''�v"-Swci L,5i0✓E
:: EXCAVATED
WITF..O:.:T
:I5-M.:SEVE-IRE-S 0PE
:: PO0s
EAS`AwNiS
1
:
1
::A'i ;IFER FED
IL
:
1 1
:
:4-S%: MODRA i t-SrR i W,-SELL
::
: DK--:, TO EATER :
DWELLINGE
:8-15'x:0D-RZATE-SLOPE,S�u'iil
1 WITH
:15-2F.,':SF nE-SLLOPE
:: DRAINAGE
: BASEMINTS
-5l iiN -51 LL
/.:FAVORABLE :
1
JA
[� (j:0-
19-Vn:l~'iv t�, Si PE1.:5L1TE
1
r-c5twAll
: I.IKMZ—RCiAL
��111C`�y y.Il\�\_5
:v'a_J/.: S`i L•:C—.7�1J�'C
:: i�r.: S7hT 1l�N
: :
: BUILDINGS
1
1
:
1
1
11
11
1 1
1 1
1
1F.,Y.:S: Tom_ l T
10- cVG L `�
1 ,
:0-c/.:FAtiifr(A$LE 1
: LOCAL
:15-%:6EVERE-LU STi ENGTH,c. OPE
C
" EE
1 1 TE � \'AL�rJ
^ 25 r.c O`m 1
1 V`L •� .J.-V: 1
: MADS AI.Q'
:
:: AO
: STRL-ETS
1
:
1
:: DIVFSIO�
11
1 1
: LAWkS,
:0-Si.:SL1G:iT
::
:0-M FAVORABLE :
: LAN.T'SCA= I NS
:8-15% : DE RATE-5L0=E
:: GRASSED
: S-S5i::
: AXD M-F
:1. x%:SEA E-SLOPE
:: WATERWAYS
: FAIRiAYS

6ASTM SERIES k'0170
RECREATIO:A, DEVELC4�'� E•`,T
i :0'�%:5LI6::T •Ynr,-_• �„y y-r. -5
i 0'�... .✓_•.A C'..ri :A.: tics ,
:8-?5% ORE
CA"=' AREAS
IS-25i::5�dE E-SCE : �P�AY6=; i i"iDE :b-ZJ'i :5EVc" Opc
PATHS ;15-M:MONERAit-S`' G E
;F'ICNiC AREAS:15-'S%:SE'r_ERE-S`OFE JW
" TRAILS ;
REGIONAL IN sFE ATICNS
CAPABlITY AKD YIELDS PER ACRE V CROrS AND PASTU".z il'I( LEVEL MiA:V' En m
CLASS- : CAPA- ;CON ; M, ; SOYBEANS :BARLEY !OATS ; 1,461- : PASTL E ;
DETER"IViiS ; EILITY ; :SILAK ; : : :LEGIZE HAY
i PHASE ; ; lB 1) ; lTtk'�S) ; (El!) : (E;J) : (Du) : (TONS) : (AUM) :
. .kIR,R�IR.R.,NIRR .IRR. Pi.r,:i 1IRR. :hiikrR .itZ'rt. ,hcR1 .IRR. :NInr. .Z.z. .ltiRR' IR,R.:hlRR-: IR.
:2-6% L,FSL : 2E .1 .1110 ; ; 26 ; ; 40 : 1 T5 ; ; 80 : 3.8 ; ; 9.1 :
16-107 L,FSL : 3E 90 ; 23 ; 35 65 ; 70 ; : 3.6 : : 8.7 ;
;20-15/. L,FSL ; 4E ; ; 85 ; 20 ; ; 30 ; 60 ; 60 : ; 3.3 ; 1 6.4
:15-25% L,FSL : 6E ; ; ; : ; ; ; : : ; ; 8.0
:2-6Y. CL,5CL,t3tOI)� ; 3E : : 90 : ; 22 ; ; 35 ; ; 65 : ; 65 : ; 2.8 ; : 8.3
6-10Y. CL,SCL,ERODED : 4E ; : 85 1 ; 20 : ; 30 : 60 : ; 60 : 1 2.5 : ; 8.0
;10-15% CL,SCL,ERODM ; 4E ; ; 80 : 16 ; ; 25 1 55 : 50 : ; 2.2 ; : 7.6 ;
:15-25% CL,SCL,ERODED : bL ; ; ; ; ; ; ; : ; ; : : 6.0
:O-2X L,FEL : I : 115 ; ; 30 ; 40 ; 75 ; ; 80 ; ; 3.9 ; : 9.3
itOQD'LA0 SUITABILITY (B)
CLASS- :DM., KWGMT PRORIMC ; POTENTIAL PZOD'.ICTIVITY
DETERMINING :SYli:ER'3S'h;EZilP.:S-=L.:W!N''DTH:PLA.:T : COlranSiTEE FMOD: TREES TO P:AIN7 ;
: PHASE : :HAZARD:LIMIT :MORT'Y:HAZARD:CO''IPM, :IQx:CLAS. :
:0-15X L,FSL .9A :SLIEx-7;SIL(T:SLIi; .T:SL- M- .M.3D P.:LOBLCLLY PIE ;90 :9 :LOELaLY PIKE
;15-25% L, FSL MR ; M;ODER.1. MOMR.: c I-T: SLI N7.1 ODER.: S;'OiiTLEAF PII E 1. .1
: ; :VIRETNIA FINE
YclN-POPLAR
: : SOUTHERN RED 0AI:
SE-UMM ;
:HICKURY '
:0-15L CL,SCL,EROD-ED :80 PIS :85 :8 :L S'Lii&LLY PI'E :
{ -'?F" L.r.� t�*1_ , n rT, l+_ �n_�n i nr r r
�..� CL,..��,ER_.L�D ,8�..SLIC . �„ZV�n SLI6PT:McwZI"; ILEk FiRE. ,
,WHITE OAS ,
:S',1:THERN RE"u OAK
:5.;"CiRTLEA= PIE

6ASTCN SERIES
kC.0:70
WiBwB=EAvs
�C_ C_`_ft=T y• '!R ^C' _C i�:Tl Ca�Cf.'_C 1_ C:7G!_' !^ CCCf''_C r�:
: `: t r• 1 1 I I 1
1 1 1 I 1 1
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I I
1 1
1 (
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
WILDLIFE HABITAT S'jITABiLiiY
(C)
CLASS-
POTENTIAL
FOR HABITAT ELIEKEhTS
; PDTEX1IAL
AS HABITAT FOR:
1 !
1 �{1!!)ti h5
1
1 G=cAi)ti
f l 1
SI I G�A;S 1 WILD
I
1)iA.RDrv� ; C: ircR : S,=„i�S
:1►� LAI'� : SiAi�ili : 0=":D
:i:�.�Di.D
!^ 1
: ivy i LA�;D 1 v,Ahi:=�i11
1
1 -
1
! SOLD
Ij 1 ER-
I�EEv"i'.E I N�nE.
1 I I
1 TREES IfiLIL4i5 1
1 I 11 I
IPLAIh'TS 1 4A;: Ir;.LDLF
1 1n. [
IWi
1��! 1 1
IFi�l.F 1)tiLD�F 1
: 0 06% L, FSL
:6-30D
: EC ;➢ ; ��D➢
: GOD : GWD :
� POCK IV. POOR; E53➢
: 03D�
!V.
F";,OC,:
21 15 [CI
,�-.,..4 ,,.,�
1[
AIR
I
IEOC�D :EC�D
1[�� 1
IGI�C:➢ GOOD 1
1 F`
:d. PC�'OR:V. Pv�:;�.��:,°➢
; S�Ct�D
1
W.
; 1
F'OG=; 1
115.. .,, c�
:r,.Y-2
IFAiR :SC:O➢
:E:➢ 1KOD 1
IV. P%'CE•;:V. F'x.=:.FAiR
•...c�V
:V.
POOR: :
,� ' , ,ERGO-�
, ti C i
:F
1• Ain
1
!FAIR :FAIR
:FAIR :FAIR ;
:PDM :V. PUM :FAIR
;FAIR
N.
POOR: ;
:8-15'/. CL,SC::-,E'0jDEr'
:PCO
:FAIR :FAIR
:FAIR :FAIR :
!V. PO:`3:V. Pi -:FAIR
;FAi3
:V.
F'ixfi:
. 1 i 5-
11�-2,Y. C.�.SCL,ERODED
1 r l 1
IV. PrOUR!PCOR FAIR
1 1 I T 1
:FAIR ',FAIR 1
rr
:V. I OCR!V. K"IPOOR
OCR!
'FAIR
'FAIR
1
IV.
1
POOR:
POOR: 1
P7E2iiik
NATIVE PLANT CoaYA—TTY QANEFL ti➢ Cr,FL ST l'w ;STMY VEE;ATION)
PLANT ;
PERCENTAGE (MY kEiE! :) BY CLASS DT-0,,!NIh6
?4, BE
CDYIKA PLANT
Nti E
; SYMBOL
F0 -RIkE WL-4CA?D
:CDFL2
:WINGEI) ELM
;LILAC
;EASTEnh REDCEDAR
;JUVI
:SASSAFRAS
;SAILS
.AFRICAN EOLLY
;ILOP
:SLKAC
:RHUS+
/SlRJiiMiFJD
.0)(AR 1
1
1 1
1
1
:EASTERN REDBUD
:CECA4
;PERSIld
:DIVIS ;
:fti =YSLt 'LE
:LONIC
;FOIS`Rv IVY
:TM
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
POTENTIAL PRM•OTION (LBS./AC. DRY ►dT).
FAVMAP E YEAR
KRKk- YEARS
: LP AVDRAELE YEARS
FOOTWJTES
A RATINGS BASD ON NSH PART 603, 7-63.
B RATINGS RASED ON W-M, 9/80.
C RATINGS BASED ON MILS KEMOIRA)iD(M-74 JAN 1972.

PACOLET

LOCATION PACOLE7
SC+AL GA NO VA
Estab . i she•c: Series
Kiev. ENS-=iW-E
1:_190
PACC LET SERIES
The Paco l et series consists of very deep, we l . dra i nec, moderately
permeab l e so i l s that formed • n :rater i a l weathered most l y f rom ac i
crystalline rocks of the Piedmont up -lands. Slopes co;: mon i y are 15 to 25
percent but range from 2 to 80 percent.
TAXONOMIC WASS: C i ayey, kao l i n i t i c, thermic Typ i s Kanna.p l udu l is
TYPICAL PEDt N: Fac o l et sandy loam - forested. (Colors are for moist
soil.)
A--ti to 3 inches; drown (7.5YR 5/4) sandy loam; few fine distinct
yellowish red (5YR 5/8) mottles; moderate medium granular structure;
friable; many fine and medium roots; strongly acid; clear- wavy boundary.
(1 to 12 inches thick)
Btl--3 to 23 inches; red (Z.5YR 4/6) clay; moderate medium subangu l ar-
tiiocky structure; firm, slightly sticky; common distinct clay films on
faces of peds; common fine and medium roots; common very fine Freres;
moderately acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Et'Z--22 to 29 inches; red (2.5YR +/6) clay; common fine distinct reddish
yellow (7.5YR 7/8) mottles; moderate medium subangular blocky structure;
firm, slightly sticky; common distinct clay films on faces of peels;
common very fine Mores; few fine flakes of mica.; moderately acid;
gradual wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of the Et
horizon is 12 to
26 inches)
BC:-- 9 to 27 inches; red (2.5YR +/6) clay loam; many medium distinct
reddish yellow (7.5YR 7/8) mottles; wean medium subangu i ar b i tacky
structure; friable; few fine flakes of mica; strong t y acid; gradual wavy
boundary. (7 to 15 inches thick)
C:1--27 to 52 inches; mottled reel (2.5YR 4/6) and reddish yellow (7.5YR
7/8) saprolito that has a cIay IGam texture; massive; friab;e; thiri
discontinuous i st i nct clay seams in cracks; few fine flakes of mica;
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (10 to 20 :riches thick)
C2--52 to O inches; l i ght ye i lowish brown (10YR /4) sapri: i i to that has
a loam texture; common medium distinct red (2.5YR 4/6) a.nc stronS brown
(7.5YR 5/:) mottles; massive; friable; strong.y acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Chester County, SGuth Carolina; L .4 miles south of
Chester in Chester County; 1.3 miles south cy junction of State Highways
16 and 250; 3,700 feet northeast of junction of State Highways ghiwa.ys 16 and
171 ; 0.9 m i le northeast of junction of anpa'vec State H i gnway 394 and
unmarked county roa o and unpaved private roar . ead i ng nortN; _ _ feet
nor"tnea.st of unpavei_ private roar.

PAGE 02
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The Bt horizon is at , eas z .2 inches thick,
,
and eaten _'s to a depth of 18 to L_• ,ches. �e Et horizon contains =F
to 65 percent clay. Depth to a. l , h i c contact is more than 60 riches.
The so i t is very strong i y acid to slightly acid in the A horizon, and
very str o _ly acid to moderately ac idthroughout the rest of the
prof i l e. Content of rock fragments, om i pant i y Brave i , ranges rr'om 0 to
35 percent in the A and E horizons, and 0 to 15 percent in the Bt
horizon. Most pedons have few to common flakes of mica in one or more
horizons.
The A t„_ r . zon has hue of 5YR to !OYR, value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 1
to 4. In er ode& areas, hue r-an^es from: 2.5YR and chroma ranges to F.
The A horizon commonly is sandy u loam, but ranges to loamy sand, fine
sandy l oa.mt or l oam i n the f i ne-earn: Tract i on. In eroded areas, i t i s
c: ay loam or sandy clay loam in the f i ne-earth fraction.
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value of 4 to 6,
and chroma of c to S. It commonly is sandy loam, but ranges to loamy
sand, fine sandy loam, loam in the fine -earth fraction.
The BA or BE horizon, where present, and the upper- part of the Bt in
most pedons, has true of 2.5YR.to 1OYR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of
to 8. It is clay loam, sandy clay loam, or loam.
The Bt horizon has true of 1GR or 2.5YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 6
or 8. Mottles in shades of yellow or brown are in the upper- part of the
Bt horizon in some pedons and in the tower- part of the Bt horizon in.
most pedons. The Bt horizon is clay, sandy clay, or clay loam.
The BC horizon has hue of 1OR to 5YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 6
or 8 commonly with mottles in shades of yellow or brown. The EC: horizon
of some pedons is mottled in shades of red, yellow, or brown. It is clay
loam, sandy clay loam, loam, or sandy loam.
The C horizon has hue of !OR to 5YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 6 or-
8 commonly with matt l es in shades of yellow or brown or is multicolored,
and is loamy saprolite weathered from felsic cr-ystailine rack
COMPETING SERIES: These are the AptlinS, Bethlehem, Cecil, Madison,
Nankin, Tumb l eton, and Wedowee series. App l i ng and Cecil soils have B.
thicker- clayey Bt horizon. Bethlehem soils have a Para l i tit i c contact
within tiL? inches. Nankin soils commyniy have a thicker Bt horizon and
Formed in marine sediments. Madison so i i s have a high content of r : ak.es
of mica. Tumb . eton sip i , s have a Et horizon h t E z� n thicker cl�:er- than �:e• i ricr:e and
f ormew in marine sediments. Wedowee so i I s have Bt hor- i zons w i th hue of
5YR or ye I l ower.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Paco l et so i , s are on gently s • lira ng to very steep
Piedmont uplands. Slopes commonly y are :5 to 25 percent but off;;
_ range r: ; e from
to 80 percent. • :e so i , s formed in materiai weat-ter"ec most :y from,
fe:sic crystal l i ne rocks. The mean annuai temperature ranges from 59 to
66 degrees E, the frost -free season ranges from 190 to 240 days, and the
,(:eon annua i precipitation ranges from: 37 to 60 inches.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are .he competing App i in:,
'sec i . , M c i soy:, ano Y;E'nowe'e series, and t ne Cata.0 l a, Hayesv i , i e,
Loc kna.r-t, Lou i sDura, Rion, Wateree series. Catau: a sty i l s have a layer
in the Et horizon that is tense and partially br . tt l e. Hayes i . . e so . c

PAGE c:
have a fetes : c temperazure regime. Lockhart so i i s have more than S5
percent coarse fragments in the particle -size control section.
1 ou i sburS, R i inn, and Wat,eree so i l s have i ess than 35 percent c i ay i n the
particle -size control section.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: !tee I i drained; runoff is men um to rapid;
internal dr'a i nacre is med : um; F ermeab i l i ty is moderate.
USE AND VEGETATION: Most areas are in forests of pine and mixed
hardwoods. Cleared areas are used for small grain, hay, and pasture.
T -.
DI S .:BUTI N AND EXTENT: The Piedmont of A abama, Georgia, Nortrl
Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The series is of large extent
SERIES E.STAFLI.cHED: Catawba County, North Carolina, 1969.
REMARKS: The December 1987 revision recognized the low activity clay
property of this so i l and reclassification to t an`,ap l udu l ts. Paco l et
soils were formerly mapped as a thin so l um phase of the Cecil series.
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of
inches (A horizon).
Ara i l l i c and Kand i c horizon - the zone from 3 to 29 inches below the
surface (Btl and Btt horizons).
MLSA = 1 S6
SIR = SC0015, SC0107 (GRAVELLY)
Rational Cooperative Sail Survey
U.S.A.

I ES n L : N{ E R A T 1 C N E C C O R D .`A'-L--
u ^-
ry -r !
- .:-A.-L: — —, CLAYEY , VAr.-.- .T:A:l
' V 9=_� rK:^�_ -: V 7=C^s._ - C--: C ,l __ -v� : "� tom_ �r_'r V -_.,- C n rr n .•r•. _.ti -r.
k=.� YE L�� , =;A� _ r �..�A3��, i-- , ti ..� a-�A ilA-� wa_ .La '" vc :
..� ..;t r. --- r. .,rT•V+-,•C _ -- V _t i' C.m-.T A-,�tV L:AY .-A LAYER, A"0 r:C_AYEV -_ ' ADJAv=1� Tl iC�_ANDS AND. Dr')',';NASZ:7 AWS. T:-1 .rl-"`:E-i=' L 1 RESD':J."- FA— E
1
J_+
' _A�'^��4A' A�tn ��L ?.A-= �_=•L^TT�S i
At , C..L4'' C , :..t..rAL A: : ��:vT r-�� : A`v�uAL , • ��it..� : 1T.lA:til'.GL r ,
DAYS, r --CC• TA�Ti{t' ,LASC
FLA7. - ;A.- K-RCE- ; : !;= NATO-: A`_ 11 : CLAD'
-)71 ORE : iN iE?:i1 : AAS„G : }i0 :?:,3-:a: : T^Ati =Ac=• a� Czc' =
1 1 , , n... 1 ,' ',' 1 T. 1
FC' T) 1(K7 4 10 r 40, 2CKI ,('CT:,
0-3 :S,FS ,L :S':,SC-S': A--,:,, ,A-4 : a-1 : 0-2 :c -F00 c:0-F0:} 4 9a 16-42 :8-20 :
0-3 :C-L,SC'ti :SC--E', C :A-4,A-6 : 0-1. : 0-1 :95-1100 90-100, 65-K 3-�-50 :20-2Z:
0-3 :L5 :S!F :A-2 : 0-1 : 0-3 :75-90 70-85 6MK 1.5-20 :5-1.5
3-29 :SC,CL,C :*L,�!i,CL :A-6,A-7 : 0-1 : 0-1 :80-100 SO- 60-95 51-75 :35-65:
:CL-,CL-rL,SC-SM,SC 3-2,A-4,A-6 : 0-1 : 0-2 :90-100 70-100 6080 30-60 :15-3a:
'5"-70:5`.FS-.L :2(,SC-SM :A-4,A-2-4 :0-1. : 0-2 :80-100 70-100 60-90 25-50 '10-25:
'P -AS- : fi3:ST fi , PER?M.EA- : AVAILAcn E : S:IL : SALINITY : S.aS : CEC : CAC;` � : GYPSUM
:(IN.): LICIT :TICITY: YMITY : .iLITY :"TiR CAPACITY: PEACTIM :
:IhLEY : (G/Cr_ : tl4r (P-) :tom- i ►): :t(�"�la: ): (pcT) : tPcT)
i5 2'8 : NP-7 : 1.00-1.50 2.0-6.0 : 0.08-0.12 : 4.5-6.5 ! : : 4-7 :
: 20-40 : 4-17 : 1.20-1.50 : 0.6-2.0 : 0.10-0.14 : 4.5-6.5 :
a-�• : 15-30 : NIP : 1.a-a-F.5.0 : 2.0-6.0 : 0.()_•-O.Ia : 4.5-6.5 : : : 2-5
:3-29 : K:-65 :FF- : 1.30-1.5, : 0.6-2.0 : MI-0.15 : 4.5--6.a : : 6-18
"" °' 20-35 : 5-15 : 1.20-1.5i : 0.6-2.0 0.08-0.15 : 4.5-6.0 : : 5-12 :
:52-70: 15_'8 ' Ky-6 : 20 art 2 r 15 r r6.0
r
S:-RNi'. ERCISI:*s: ,a.•c0 : k Q- , CC:-- 7::SiE1TY ,
:liN.):XA%.L.- : UE: FACT ," :E:h'ZD,.: EKD.
1 1� (C•`T) �:1:'.TCY:••:l�:TA:' tJ1 kt' - 'G''7' I,A•�1_V C-'_- .CiC..r
11 ✓,
: 0-3 .5-2 . L..Ll: 3 : 3 : t"-: : `hTE' n.Q`
11'
0-3 : .5 2 LN :.15:.15: 'S : 3 : 86• :
..-LQ : 0-.5 : LU :.w ..22C:
LU-
:5L-7v: a- 5 LU '.
*ITS ' =! 6 L'=. .'1^!...., IC.'AC' - - _'t�•6-._C-.�
• S xA_? TAu C� w�'?�D A't ' T +yam. ;¢:'a^_i .I'-�•.-i ...•. .� .•.-�.., _r_ .r-� _; F=IG_• •CT r ,
r ,

•Ti: �A ;. '�-iS.::Y_'vl__ i-�L-_C v: C_J_``
11
''F-,-�.• --c
1 GTnT
+
rl
1
' 4�-?%•: y�:e�r.71T�-v�t�i.. �^ J�U='G
1
`IR-r...�k�w-�I:.tCy -...�..r '
1 CE, S 1 8 % EE E r v_CLPC
1 to-= .7-cJ....��"t-
LP.�'�
SAO
' AREAS
+ +
1
1
�
T ..,T
LA
1
1
rl
1
1 SA'.:'Az
:t.-:�I:.:, ':u`� �kT•c-..mil-:
�-��_�
f l
fl�_Ci:.• `_ ,-e.- lips-
LA
I5-'c'ri.:SE7 E CtF_
(A:'EA)
11
f
;2-S%:FAIP-T00 CLAYEY
1
1 AILY
,._. .^ Trr. r•: AYEY C: W=
.., :5%:=A:;-;�_ .: .,.,�U:
11
11
.-r^ k' ••may_
iir-�� 1,V.!.A, U-1)
1 CODE,^, =ice
; i .•:
11
Icy�-a :€�fMERA7m-5 - AE ,
f LA+FiLL
1
rr �n
1 • DONID.
2-1S :ML: -:RA E- 1
1�
1
11 �� '1,rj� Tr,
11 R1�rCE�IiJ:i1
;�1[1� 1
G Qn%:..��G •V-S`� 1
AKEA
CLAYEY
;;
:SE6_=:L:__PiPI°4 ;
1 BALL":i
; :Yti:iEA_` "C
;EY,C:AYATI: �S
; i5_c+r.':C:vES'E -UPE
; ; �I 8 AiC
;
1
'
1
•
1
;; LEVEES
11
1 1
+
Ir
1
1
f
1` `�•
f- ,•:J .ri: i I
I I
,r
1 v_'Ci.-a_-iA nkTE:•t 1
nT,�
IV-a�.•:•,Yi3D ,HT�-v
rA `/Ar. ..
. r EXCAVATE:
1 11
: 1
1
i5-80 :SEdE=w-S ^1`E
; ; FUNDS
;
1!AQ �
; .n,ItiE�L':r�
' 8-:5% :'rClr_ c-P•�.r-='E
� 1
1 ;
1
11
1
1
�'•l!::t=`�=?A"c-5__-�
..
1
V1 11.�•, L-i A-
'C-Vlt�:�E'j .c-SOPZ'
L�1
11 :n�+:6.AT: ��
:%_�`•.. C'L C� 6.
I ai� . A . i•.iAIt
L. IT: R'1. !:�C
#
:% I c c r.-- r c- T
1
L^k�
;8-.F%:'='."•==;�Tc-�=ice 5`iE�'=,S_�:
; ;
T.Etiz.Ai1S
n iA c A:'
1._+ i;t �•.6cb'E-,�-. _v
; ;
-_%8�,w,=. BLCw
SIRE=-C
r
1 r
±1
RR V ., O.:c
IC.-r.:. .^. c -_ •C, r::,: r ^. :.

­•o 77-A:
2 0 S
-_-q
89
9; 09 i
71:
U
IjI
UBE
ENTIA A7 cl T
9: OL:
-j 1-3:
33
EC, "EA:
�A:
T 06:
R`�_J`0`537�_A: 1A) 178: _'L;9l7T L­31733:3�3A_38'. Ta-kM
':0
3jjT,4 �137:L­s ;
-Iun
8: 0j:
'z Ta -,:It a : * G.1, V— ,
_N a '22 UCW
Va:
11
y _\1 M -
d A-!
0 ,
_d SM, LU t
AM
I A. _,j,
3L
r-mou 7a -n
%,
S-ir
---g
39
i
i (10*7
1. OIL i i 019 i i 919 i i
--IF 1.
.1 009 T.:
1. 09 i 11 i i 019 It 019 i 11
3!p :
UCOU"13s'73 %01-9.
W:
t 9L O'D 919 919 11
3r_l 11
%OT-9:
i U i i 009 i 019 11 019 1.
ES
-C.133-0,831 —;0317) v.9-Z:
W ZZ
018 OOL OIL O'L
37,
8 T�
..E It
ClAillv) 09iv) 1.
1
-19
INIP:
C - -I 711C I
�Q 1 01 — C� "I , - 1,7, 3a 1. 2 "1 C. I
7D,31 L.jT'-) 3--Z­:�­
­::j A ­:tl SG
Xv"-
-a v 4
�N v
3 7 3 - 3 ',� _3A3S:%08-�':fT;SV-2"V
01--li-3-d:
INC. Z
7C
7 %

C A 32- E 2 A
!-y
A:
K
-AND
?_Ace K
D: h t7c
C I !
p� V.
2- OY Cl*L D
FOR FAIR
."i PD�_; V. K :,;R
FA_. R IV. Ku:�-R:
::­;;M, FAT R P03:FAIRF
I IFA 7
:V. P.". :V. -­L-La-�
:c T-� :V. p
E
110-5% C-_ K- IF'OnE
Ul' 7, N. P�
:V. -IV. CK- ; V .
DZ V.
5 - Dl . :V. DC�-;R:, m'V.DL&RIV.
PC&"!
:V. K V. icV,
V. ...R V. Pv:t:
pr.77�7T
-AL N-A_rlV= D P:- CC!?�-K�NITY
:7r c-r 7
(RANKLANM F. . _-­_ -IEr Y Vz_ E7 A- I CA
MY OEH��i7) BY LAc--c:
CDYON PLAN7
NAME i symKIL
CL,sca
'L T T -ILC F_ LES-_Z,
SCEC
37
'PANiCLY.
I IFA N" I -'c 1.
8
:TALL rjA'r,VZPM-
AREL3
2
I .S�TTC-r
- AR; EO
I
Lm. H
29 9
It
I---
WITIS
LOVER
DEE' SN2
;ELLIOTT, K-.ESTEM
40EL
L.7T
'S? BEARD KLES 7-M.
AN 72
P L,.7' EV, 7
NT -A! PRODUiLMICUN
(LEE./Ar'.. NY WT)
FAMRALE Yc-k,:::S
nZ Yj 1850
rUFMAL YEARS
2 4 157 1650
Y:_:'QS
MOT'CO-TES
A EC7TW.A=5 [IF r E
D- 17-AZ
TES, n7A
E RAT TIEFE! LZATH-D Ca
PAI�T 6021 A—.
C.. ` Tn: pi! -: cp.;:
rz,cjN A7 EI&E ELEVA77LINS,
: A-Yktc_ bp.su N::- SF--, lns.
16 A RA-IME
OVERR'IDE. SEE THE 77 31!
-A- 1. OVER-RIN FILE FO: P! F T.-l.!S