20061274 Ver 2_More Info Received_20070413

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Josh Witherspoon, LSS
524 New Hope Road ~~ _ t ~1 y v Z
919-212-1760
919-212-1707 Fag
[e-mail]
T_ F_ TTF_ R n F TR,4 N,cMrTTa r.
TO: Ms. Cindy Karoly DATE: 13 Apri12007 JOB NO,: ER06-043.00
N.C. Division of Water Quality RE: Turtle Creek Phase 2 Individual Permit Additional
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250 Copies
Raleigh, NC 27604

WE ARE SENDING YOU
^ Attached ^ Under separate cover via Fed Ex the following items
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
3 13 April 2007 Individual Permit Application
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
^ For approval ^ Approved as submitted
^ For your use ^ Approved as noted
^ As requested ^ Returned for corrections
^ For review and comment ^
^ For bids due 2007 ^ Prints returned after loan to use
REMARKS
Attached are three additional copies of the The Villages at Turtle Creek Individual Permit Application
as requested per the Request for More Information dated 26 March 2007. Please contact me should
you have any questions or need additional information.
T^
f}
^ Resubmit _ copies for approval
^ Submit _ copies for distribution
^ Return _ corrected prints
Y'Jktl ~"1't'

o ~ - l a'1 ~ v ~,
APPLCATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
l33 GFR 3251 Expires December 3i, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is sestimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number, Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection ,Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application Isee sample drawings and instructions! and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. ~ 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE ~ 3. DATE RECEIVED ~ 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
i1rFMC RFr nw rn RF FU I Fn RV dPOI ICdN71
T'S NA
ME
5. APPLICA
N HORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE Ian agent /s aot requ~redl
8.
A
U
T
~~ii ``
"
A
h~, ~
-+
~
-
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS

',. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence E a. Residence
b. Business ~ b. Business ~.4~C,~°'~j~,"~7~~`
11 STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
rurnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 1 DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE isee msirucrions: _
13. NAME OF VJATERBODY, IF KNOWN rrlapplicablel 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS lifapp/icab/e) )~ ~ ~'' ""'
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT r,; ~;": .j
COUNTY STATE '''Y?"f l
-_ __ -__
'6. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, Iseeinstructlansl r'Ft",r

17, DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE ,`
~~k~ ~~ ~ ~ ~C~ h'~-V~,~ ~ii is .r~, ~~, i5~~~f\'~ 1`~L. ~ ~.C~ r ~/~ tJ-~,t"''~
!t~ It`/C:.~C~.~-~..~ C1~ 1t-~{- i~5t~~.~-'~c9v'i, ~\ 1V~--~ v~~~ ~.,f'`~ ~~~L:r\~=,1 ~1t1
4 u 7 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE, (Proponent: CECW-OR)

'8. I`IatUCB Of ACti Vlty (Description o. projxt, include alr ,-~iU~es
r
...-..: K„.~„„m
19. Project PUrpO,Se (De}(s~cribe [he reason or purpose of the prefect, see instructions!
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reasonisf for Discharge
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see ;nsrrucr;ons)
,~L - IA ~..~ t,`
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No ~ IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (lf more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list),
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IUtN I IhIGA I IUN NUMk3tH UH ~ t HrrutV uH i t Nrrnvv r:v uri 1 t uuvicu
"Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
~ ° _3~L~L'~-
""- SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 1 1 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section IODI provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to Contain any false, fictitious. or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than 510,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.

AGENT AL`THORIZATION ~-1GREEMENT
To: Mr. Ronnie Smith
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
I, Brian D. Dilsheimer ,representing DCNC North Carolina L LLC
(applicant/owner), hereby authorize Josh Witherspoon of Environmental Services, Inc.
to act as our authorized agent with regard to the Villages at Turtle Creek Individual
Permit Application .This project is located in Surf City in Pender County, North
Carolina.
DCN orth Caro 'na I, L.L.C.
By: Dilsheimer Communities of North Carolina, LLC, its Manager,
By: Brian D. Dilsheimer, Manager

Joint Federal and State Application Form
For Activities Affecting Waters of the United States
or Waters of the State of North Carolina
The Villages at Turtle Creek Phase 2/DCNC North Carolina I, LLC
18. Nature of Activity
The site will be developed for a residential subdivision using heavy construction equipment. Phase 1 of
The Villages at Turtle Creek has previously been permitted under Nationwide Permit 39 (Action ID #
200600208) and 401 Water Quality Certification (DWQ Project # 20061274). Phase 2 of this
development is covered under this Individual Permit Application (Figure 1 in Appendix A). Phase 2 was
not fully designed at the time of the PCN submittal. Eleven wetland crossings (impacts 10-20) and one
stream crossing (impact 12) will allow home owner access as well as emergency services access to US 17
(Sheets 1-13 in Appendix A).
19. Project Purpose
The overall purpose of this project is to provide a residential community capable of attracting citizens
from primarily the eastern seaboard by providing affordable housing in an area where the availability of
this type of housing is declining. Wetlands bisect the property. Specifically, one wetland area bisects the
portion of the property adjacent to US 17 within Phase 2 and separates this portion of the site from the
remainder of the property. The purpose of this project is to provide access from US 17 to the remainder
of the property. "The Town of Surf City has determined that a major entrance into the development from
US 17 is critical to the project, and thus, is required to ensure adequate and safe provision of emergency
services, such as emergency medical, fire prevention, and public safety support" (see letter from the Town
of Surf City in Appendix B). Additionally, the purpose of this project also includes the following: the
necessity for traffic from the development to access US 17 in an efficient manner, to keep the traffic
flowing smoothly through the development, and to provide an alternate entrance to the development so all
traffic wanting to access the development does not utilize the NC 210 entrance. See Appendix A far area
layouts for Areas 10 - 20. This provides detail of each road crossing.
20. Reason(s) For Discharge
Wetland impact 10 (0.15 acre) is due to a road crossing and is within the previously permitted Fhase 1.
Two 24 inch culverts will be installed to ensure hydrologic connectivity of the wetland area.
Wetland impact 11 (0.235 acre) is due to a road crossing. The road alignment is at the narrowest area of
the wetland. Two 15 inch culverts will be installed to ensure hydrologic connectivity of the wetland area.
Wetland impact 12 (0.623 acre) is due to a road crossing. The road alignment is at the narrowest area of
the wetland. Five 48 inch culverts will be installed to ensure hydrologic connectivity of the wetland area.
This impact includes 70.0 linear feet of stream impact. Impact 12 is necessary to provide access from the
Phase 1 of the project to US 17.

Wetland. impact 13 (0.019 acre) is due to road aligi~rnent and the necessary side slopes of the hammer
head.
Wetland impact 14 (0.123) is due to road alignment and the necessary side slopes of the hammer head.
Wetland impact 15 (0.203 acre) and 16 (0.691 acre) are due to a road crossing. The road alignment is at
the only portion of the wetlands possible for any road alignment and due to the configuration of the
property. Two 48 inch culverts will be installed at each of the crossings to ensure hydrologic connectivity
of the wetland areas. Impacts 15 and 16 are necessary to provide access from the Phase 1 of the project to
US 17 as well as to provide access to a large upland area within Phase 2.
Wetland impact 17 (0.044 acre) is due to a road crossing. The road alignment is at the narrowest area of
the wetland. Two 15 inch culverts will be installed to ensure hydrologic connectivity of the wetland area.
Wetland impact 18 (0.055 acre) is due to a road crossing and is within the previously permitted Phase 1.
Three 60 inch culverts will be installed to ensure hydrologic connectivity of the wetland area.
Wetland impact 19 (0.085 acre) is due to road alignment and the necessary side slopes of the road.
Wetland impact 20 (0.008 acre) is due to a road crossing. The road alignment is at the narrowest area of
the wetland.
21. Types} of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards.
The impacts to Waters of the U.S. are necessary for road construction and the associated side slopes
associated with Phase 2. Culverts will be place within the fill in order to ensure hydrologic connectivity
within the wetlands impacted. See table 1 below.
Filling: 2.173 acres 16,039 cubic feet

Table 1. Road Crossing Impact Details for The Villages at Turtle Creek
Wetland
Impact # Non Riparian Fill
(Square feet) Non-Riparian Fill
(Acres) Riparian Fill
(Square feet/acres) Approx. Fill
Volume (CU.YD.)
10 6,546.44 0.150 0 658
11 10,228.20 0.235 0 1,515
12 24,422.44 0.560 2,729.78/0.063 a 5,028
13 831.96 0.019 0 123
14 5,356.10 0.123 0 397
15 8,851.01 0.203 0 1,639
16 30,119.71 0.691 0 5,578
17 1,898.6 0.044 0 96
18 2,402.41 0.055 0 285
19 3,687.93 0.085 0 683
20 331.49 0.008 0 37
Totals: 94,676.29 2.173 2,729.78/0.063 a 16,039
Stream Impacts
Road Crossing/ Stream
Name Perennial (ft) Important (ft) DWQ Stream
Score USACE
Stream Score
Wetland Impact # 12 70.0 70.0 33.3 83
Totals: 70.0 70.0
a Riparian wetland area is based on twice the maximum depth of the channel perpendtcutar to cnannet.
24. Names and addresses of all adjoining properties. (Appendix A)
16. List all certifications, Approvals, and Denials received from Federal, State, or Local Agencies for
work described in the in this application.
USACE Jurisdictional Determination approval: Action ID # 200600208 (reviewed by Mr. Ronnie Smith)
USACE Nationwide Permit 39: Action ID # 200600208
NCDWQ 401 Water Quality Certification: DWQ Project # 20061274
Stormwater Permit No.: SW8 060608 (Phase 1 and 2)
Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) Permit Project ID: Pende-2006-456 (Phase 1)
ESC Permit No. for Right-of--Way Improvements Project ID: Pende-2007-287 (DOT ROW)
ESC Permit No.: WQ0030161 (Phase 1 and 2)
Public Water Supply Authorization to Construct: Serial No. 0600974, Town of Surf City 0741015
(Phase 1)
Public Water Supply Authorization to Construct: Serial No. 0601655, Town of Surf City 0741015
(Phase 2)

Additional Information
Alternative Analysis
No Action Alternative
A "No Action" alternative is here considered to be one that avoids all wetland and surface water impacts.
Due to the constraints dictated by site topography and land-grading requirements, this project cannot be
downsized or shifted to avoid all jurisdictional areas and still satisfy project purpose and need.
Additionally, due to the necessary area needed for a development such as this, it has proven to be
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to locate a different site of this size where no jurisdictional areas
occur in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina.
A "No Action" decision at this location would result in negative economic impacts to moderate income
families due to the decline of affordable housing in the area that the Villages of Turtle Creek would
provide. The "No Action" alternative is not capable of achieving the applicant's stated purpose and need
of the proposed project.
Preferred Alternative (Proposed Site)
The area around Surf City is currently experiencing rapid growth. Land values on the island are
extremely high, and there is simply not much undeveloped land remaining to sustain a residential
development of this type. As the Town of Surf City continues to expand and more people relocate to this
area, finding affordable housing will continue to be a challenge. The Villages at Turtle Creek plans to
provide affordable housing for moderate income families. The Villages at Turtle Creek site is centrally
located between US 17, NC 210 and HWY 50. The large tract of land in close proximity to the Town of
Surf City, Jacksonville, and the City of Wilmington has been determined through market analysis to be an
ideal place to fill the need for more housing in the area.
DCNC contacted several property owners concerning properties adjacent to or in the vicinity of the Turtle
Creek project concerning purchasing their properties in order to possibly minimize and avoid
jurisdictional impacts. There was very little interest from the parties other than the parties from which
DCNC purchased the current parcels for the project site. Other properties with US 17 frontage or near US
17 were evaluated for potential purchase. These properties were encumbered by access easements or
rights-of--way through private property to access US 17. Obtaining subdivision access through these
private easements is generally impractical. One parcel evaluated with frontage on US 17 had issues with
the title. The parcels purchased for the project site to allow access from US 17 were purchased
specifically for access to US 17. The preferred alternative provides connectivity to US 17 as requested by
the Town of Surf City.
The following information lists the primary reasons that DCNC has chosen the project site for The
Villages at Turtle Creek project.

Environmental
1. The topography of the site is generally flat to gently rolling and is well suited to development.
2. Some areas of the site are flat and open, which lend the land to higher density development.
3. The existing pond on the site is a tremendous asset to the project. The pond on the property
would be extremely difficult to construct today due to cost and the current environmental
regulations.
4. The site has no hazardous issues hindering development.
5. There are no protected species issues associated with this site.
6. The site does not contain any Areas of Environmental Concern regulated under CAMA.
Avoidance and Minimization
The appropriate roadway design is critical to allow the remainder of the project site to be properly
planned and designed. The design team believes that the roadway design presented in this permit
application and report represents the most practicable and least environmentally damaging alternative
while still maintaining the applicant's purpose and need. Completely avoiding wetland and stream
impacts from road crossings is not possible on this property. The position of the wetlands and streams in
the landscape makes it virtually impossible to avoid jurisdictional impacts. The design team has made
tremendous efforts to reduce the amount of unavoidable impacts to wetlands and streams. Road
alignments have been modified where feasible. Crossings have been designed to cross wetlands at their
narrowest point in most instances.
During the design process of this project, several design iterations were produced that would result in
varying jurisdictional impacts (figures in Appendix C). The original site plans (Fig. 2A and 2B) proposed
3.28 acres of jurisdictional impacts for the entire project (Phases 1 and 2). Revisions were made to these
plans to further avoid and minimize impacts (Fig. 2C and 2D) and reduced proposed impacts to 2.689 and
2.841 acres respectively. The current site plan reflects further minimization and avoidance and proposes
to impact 2.647 acres for the entire project site. A previous Nationwide Permit authorized 0.41 acre of
jurisdictional impacts for Phase 1, resulting in 2.236 acres of additional jurisdictional impacts within
Phase 2.
Avoidance -Jurisdictional stream and wetland areas are present within the project study area. During the
planning and design phase of a project, efforts should be made to avoid impacts to the greatest extent
practicable. It is not be possible to avoid all impacts to jurisdictional areas, due to design constraints.
The Turtle Creek design team has gone to great lengths to avoid wetland and stream where practicable.
Certain unavoidable impacts are necessary to fulfill the applicant's purpose and need. Residential lots
were also removed from certain areas to avoid jurisdictional impacts.
Minimization -The design team has minimized jurisdictional impacts to wetlands and streams. Road
crossings have been designed to avoid wetland impacts to the greatest extent. Fill slopes have been
designed to minimize the amount of fill needed at wetland crossings. Wetlands are being crossed at their
narrowest points as safety and engineering practices allow. As previously mentioned, the design team has
reduced the total amount of jurisdictional impacts within the project site from 3.28 acres to 2.647 acres.

Compensatory Mitigation -The applicant is proposing a variety of compensatory mitigation measures to
offset the unavoidable loss of jurisdictional areas resulting from construction of Phase 2 of The Villages
at Turtle Creek. Mitigation will be required for 0.063 acre of riparian wetland fill and 2.173 acres of non-
riparian wetland fill. In accordance with USACE and DWQ current standards, mitigation will not be
required for the 70.0 feet of stream channel.
Proposed mitigation procedures include the conservation non-impacted wetlands within Phase 2 of the
project site in addition to the 61.5 acres conserved under the NWP 39 for Phase 1 of the project site.
Additionally, payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program for 0.063 acre of riparian wetland
impacts and 2.173 acres of non-riparian wetland impacts has been requested.
Federal Protected Species
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially Proposed (P) for
such listing, receive protection under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 US 1531 et seq.) as
amended. The most recent list prepared by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is dated
29 January 2007. This list indicates that thirteen endangered species have ranges considered to extend
into Pender County. Table 2 lists these thirteen species. Records held by the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP) were reviewed by ESI on 21 March 2007 to determine if any federal
protected species have been documented from the project study area or the surrounding vicinity. NCNHP
records indicate a known occurrence of an American alligator approximately 2.5 miles south of the
project site. NCNHP records indicate no known occurrences of any of the other species within 3.0 miles
of the project site.
Table 2. Federal Protected Species for Pender County, North Carolina (29 January 20071ist)
Common Name Scientific Name Federal
Status Habitat
Present Biological
Conclusion
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis T(S/A) Y None
Required
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus T N No Effect
Green sea turtle Chelonia mydas (incl.
agassizi) T N No Effect
Loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta T N No Effect
Piping plover Charadrius melodus T N No Effect
Red-cockaded
woodpecker Picoides borealis E Y No Effect
Shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum E N No Effect
West Indian manatee Trichechus manatus E N No Effect
American chaffseed Schwalbea Americana E N No Effect
Cooley's meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi E N No Effect

Tahln 2 rnntinnPrl_
Golden sedge Carex lutea E N No Effect
Rough-leaved Lysimachia asperulaefolia E Y No Effect
loosestrife
Seabeach amaranth Amaranthus pumilus N No Effect
T
° ~; - endangered, 1 - t nreatenea, i l~iH~ - i nrea~eneu uue w ~niiiiai icy ~~ at,Y~~ ~.~~.
*Historic record -the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
NCNHP records indicate no documented occurrences of RCW within 3.0 miles of the project site.
Suitable foraging habitat for the RCW was identified within the pine woodland community type in the
mid-portion of the project site. Alteration of the pine woodland is anticipated as a result of this project.
However, this suitable foraging habitat within the project site is not contiguous to or within 300 feet of
suitable foraging or nesting habitat. Therefore, this project should have no effect on RCW.
NCNHP records indicate no documented occurrences of rough-leaved loosestrife within 3.0 miles of the
project site. Suitable habitat for rough-leaved loosestrife was identified in the ecotone between long-leaf
pine savannas and shrubby wetland areas throughout the project site. ESI biologists viewed multiple
rough-leaved loosestrife individuals to assess its current vegetative status on June 5, 2006 prior to visiting
the project site. These individuals were observed at the North Carolina Botanical Garden in Chapel Hill,
North Carolina. The species was fully recognizable as it was in its flowering stage. The survey for
rough-leaved loosestrife was conducted within its survey window (mid May -June) during the weeks of
June 19 and June 26, 2006 by ESI biologists Lauren Cobb, Gail Tyner, John Merritt, and Robert Turnbull.
Pedestrian transects were walked throughout the areas identified as suitable habitat within the project
study area in order to document the presence or absence of rough-leaved loosestrife. No rough-leaved
loosestrife was identified within any of the areas identified as suitable habitat. Therefore, it is ESI's
professional opinion that this project will have no effect on rough-leaved loosestrife.
No other habitat for any of the remaining listed species occurs within the project boundaries.
Cultural Resources
ESI submitted a letter to Peter Sandbeck of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
dated 12 March 2007 requesting formal regulatory clearance for Phase 2 of the Villages at Turtle Creek
by the SHPO (see Appendix B). This information was forwarded to Mr. Nathan Henry of the Ft. Fisher
Office of the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology in an email dated 7 March 2007. In an email
dated 8 March 2007, Mr. Henry stated that he would not recommend an archaeological survey of this
phase of the project (Appendix B). ESI has not received formal clearance from SHPO at the date of the
permit application submittal.

Project Figures

eoGra\Projects\2006\043\acad\loc_v02.tlwg, 3rz32ool tetiret rrvt

p~pendi~
Correspondences

~;iv'V~~JNn~iENa_~~, S~FtVIC~S. ?.I~aC.
X24 S. NE~X% HOPE ROAD
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA L7610
919-212-1760 FAX [phone]
www.environmentalservicesinc.com V ax ~ , ~ 4
12 March 2007 ~~~ ~'
Peter Sandbeck
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Re: Turtle Creek Phase 2, Pender County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Sandbeck:
Cavanaugh & Associates, on behalf of their client, is planning to construct the proposed Turtle
Creek Phase 2 residential development in Pender County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2).
The proposed project is located on the south side of US 17 and borders Turtle Creek Phase 1,
which was reviewed by your office and cleared in a letter dated August 22, 2006 (ER 06-1294).
Phase 2 of the project will require an Individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
This information was forwarded to Nathan Henry of the Ft. Fisher Office of the North Carolina
Office of State Archaeology in an email dated 7 March 2007. In an email dated 8 March 2007,
Mr. Henry stated that he would not recorrunend an archaeological survey of the tract.
Environmental Services, hic., on behalf of Cavanaugh & Associates, is requesting formal
regulatory clearance of this project by the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office. If
you have any questions or coininents, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
~v_.._ _._r._
~._.__ - )
Scott ~eibel, RP/A
Assistan~~-i~'President
Encl. (2)
JACKSONVILLE • ST. AUGUSTINE • COCOA • JUPITER • DESTIN SAVANNAH ATLANTA RALEIGH CHARLOTTE • ASHEVILLE

Nathan C. Henry, l 1:07 AM 3/8/2007, Re: Turtle Creek Phase 2 Page 1 of 1
X-ASG-Debug-I D: 1173366434-62d300330000-2ALwK9
X-Barracuda-URL: ham://mx.esinc.cc:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Connect: imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net[205.152.59.71]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1173366434
Date: Thin, 08 Mar 2007 10:07:11 -0500
From: "Nathan C. Henry" <[e-mail]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Scott Seibel <[e-mail]>
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Turtle Creek Phase 2
Subject: Re: Turtle Creek Phase 2
X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at esinc.cc
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.5
QUARANTINE LEVEL=2.5 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.10678
Rule breakdown below pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Mar 2007 15:07:15.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[75262770:01 C76193]
Nathan Henry wrote:
Hi Scott, I visited the site yesterday. I would not recommend a survey for that tract.
Nathan Henry
Assistant State Archaeologist and Conservator
Underwater Archaeology Branch NC Office~'of State Archaeology
PO Box 58
Kure Beach, NC 28449
Phone: [phone]
http://www. arch.dcr.state. nc. us/default. htm
NOTICE: E-Mail to and from me, in connection with the transaction of public business, is
subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not represent those of my agency.
Printed for Scott Seibel <[e-mail]> 3/20/2007

_. _ _.~
t __ fir' ~~ _ ~ -~ ~ a ..` ~ ~ ` ,
1'. ~). I3t~~`~ ~-+?~ ~l-I'~. ~1:~~ I~I~~~RI~i:lV'}_ till:i~ t_~I i i'. "~:C ~.~-I-I
,. ;,.
i~:icl;hor,c: I~)1Oj ~~'4-._tl zl I~~'a~;: (':)1(~I ..~_,~ ,?
I~itti~:~`lsur•fcit~~.;~c~~~~~t'kice.i~~>>>~
~^~. I), (7~3i~ti~r~ (iety. Jr., Mayor i)unald R. 1lciins, Cain7~ii A-1~mbcr
*~li;lva It. Alhur~. 1~la~~c~r f'ro-tem houghs C. Medlin, Council 1~tember
1~lichael H, (:urle~~, C'ot~~i~cil A1em(,icr 1','illi~;~n~ ,I, IGuilii}'1 ~o~l~lcr. Council ~~lemb~r
June 6, 2006
Mr. William G. Simmons, Jr., P.E.
Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A.
130 North Front Street, Suite 202
Wilmington, NC 28401
Ref: The Villages at Turtle Creek development
Dear Gus:
This letter is to confirm the Town of Surf Gity's requirements relative to Tha Villages at Turtle Creek
subdivision, located between US Hwy 17 and NC .Hwy 210,.near Atkinson hoop Road, in the Town of
Surf City. The Town of Surf City has reviewed the preliminary site plan and development plans for the
subject project, and has determined that a major' 6nfrance into the development;from US Hwy 17 is
critical to the project,. and thus, is required to ensure the adequate and sate provision of emergency
services, such as emergency medical, fire prevention, and "public safety support. Please continue with
the development as approved by the Tavvn of Surf City Town Council, and keep the Town apprised of
your progress in obtaining all remaining permits and approvals.
If, upon receipt and `review of. this infor anon, ;yota have any questions or would like to discuss this
matter at greater length, please do not,l~esitate to contact me at your earliest cpnvenience.
Regards, ,1`
Todd Rademacher
Planning Director
-~ ~- .c.`_._ i
.y
~:~ _
..
.~ _ _ - ~-- __a.___-
...r ..,,.-- ----
rs ...,. r.. - dy - - --- ' ~-------.~.-,..--- ...-~--~ ~ +
r .,_~ ._
_ _ -„
..~ - ~.

Appendix
Adjacent Property Owners

Turtle Creek Adjacent Property Owner Information
(All property owners are 'Now or Formerly' owners of the properties.)
Number Name Address Deed Book Information
1* Gloria J. Dearmas & 24366 US Highway 17 N D.B. 997, P. 140
Norman E. Sheppard Hampstead, NC 28443-3052
2 McCager Batts 1188 Highway 17 North D.B. 927, P. 250
Hampstead, NC 28443
3* Oston G. Hardison & Wife, 24390 US Highway 17 N Q.B. 754, P. 755
Jaqueline D. Hardison Hampstead, NC 28443-3052
4* Oston G. Hardison & Wife, 24390 US Highway 17 N D.B. 724, P. 61
Jaqueline D. Hardison Hampstead, NC 28443-3052
5* Oston G. Hardison & Wife, 24390 US Highway 17 N D.B. 724, P. 61
Jaqueline D. Hardison Hampstead, NC 28443-3052
6* Oston G. Hardison & Wife, 24390 US Highway 17 N D.B. 913, P. 192
Jaqueline Denise Hardison Hampstead, NC 28443-3052
7 Sallie Bragg Batts c/o Miller Bragg D.B. 214, P. 96
7734 Alexander Rd M.B. 5, P. 17
Wilmington, NC 28405
8 James D. Dixon, Sr. c/o Catherine George D.B. 403, P. 151
1214 Kings Grant Rd
Wilmington, NC 28405
9* Gloria J. Dearmas 24366 US Highway 17 N D.B. 997, P. 140
Hampstead, NC 28443-3052
10 Lester Bryant Shepard 24514 US Highway 17 D.B. 1394, P. 146
Hampstead, NC 28443
11 Nettie Hardison 110 S. Court St D.B. 1428, P. 265
Jacksonville, NC 28540 M.B. 31, P. 90
12 Pamela Alexander 506 Brunswick St D.B. 1426, P. 322
Wilmington, NC 28401 M.B. 31, P. 90
13 Preston C. King, III & Wife 2030 Hwy 210 W D.B. 1492, P. 287
Joyce Renee King Hampstead, NC 28443
14* Woody L. Atkinson 247 Atkinson Loop Rd D.B. 661, P. 238
Hampstead, NC 28443
15* Sheila Atkinson Slater 153 Atkinson Loop Rd D.B. 730, P. 31
Hampstead, NC 28443-8997 M.B. 22, P. 35

Number Name Address Deed Book Information
16* Sheila Atkinson Slater 153 Atkinson Loop Rd D.B. 730, P. 31
Hampstead, NC 28443-8997 M.B. 22, P. 35
17* Woody L. Atkinson 247 Atkinson Loop Rd D.B. 661, P. 240
Hampstead, NC 28443 M.B. 22, P. 35
18* Myra T. Rochelle & Husband 1865 Nc Highway 210E D.B. 416, P. 64
James L. Rochelle, Jr. Hampstead, NC 28443-7902 M.B. 4, P. 55
19 David Wilson Justice, Sr. 620 Mill Creek Rd D.B. 1522, P. 118
Hampstead, NC 28443 M.B. 32, P. 132
20 Stephen Ross Justice, Jr. & Wife, 1887 NC Highway 210E D.B. 2347, P. 72
Paula Denise Justice Hampstead, NC 28443-7902 M.B. 32, P. 132
21 John Mark Baldridge 1217 N Topsail Drive D.B. 2368, P. 145
Surf City, NC 28445 M.B. 4, P. 55
22* Myra T. Rochelle & Husband 1865 Nc Highway 210E D.B. 747, P. 166
James L. Rochelle, Jr. Hampstead, NC 28443-7902 M.B. 25, P. 58
23* Gloria J. Dearmas 24366 US Highway 17 N D.B. 677, P. 48
Hampstead, NC 28443-3052
24* Emmett Sniff 252 Stag Dr Q.B. 810, P. 125
Hampstead, NC 28443-7806 M.B. 4, P. 55
25* FHMM LLC 115 Long Leaf Dr M.B. 23, P. 30
Hampstead, NC 28443
26* Green Alton, et al. 155 Man Hollow Church Rd
Hampstead, NC 28443
27 Martha Hardison Batts 145 Hardison Dr M.B. 31, P. 90
Hampstead, NC 28443
28 Adolf & Lillian Hardison 226 Hardison Dr M.B. 31, P. 90
Hampstead, NC 28443
29 Bernice Hardison 149 Christian Chapel Rd M.B. 31, P. 90
Hampstead, NC 28443
30 Elizabeth Herring Campbell, et al. 3343 Sandy Street M.B. 31, P. 90
Norfolk, VA 23518
31 Louvinia M Shepard & Others 421 Shepards Rd M.B. 31, P. 90
Hampstead, NC 28443
*These property owners own more than one property adjacent to Tu rtle Creek.

NOTE: TOTAL AREA = 244.52 ACRES
~~~

SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
8 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
o
~ ~ ~ ,:,
~~
~u
s
~:
nf~~~,ra
V I
I ~
Q a
L
C
Z~
C
Q ~
1 Q~
0
L
M
y
C
0
07
N
SON LOOP
W ~
~ ~
~ ~z
~ ~' o

~ ~~
°
~

~

~ a
z
a

Q ~
~~ ~w
o
W ~ °

c~ ~ z z
b °
~
w
_
~ 4
x Q
a

NON-RIPARIAN WETLAND, RIPARIAN WETLAND, AND
STREAM IMPACTS FROM ROAD CROSSINGS
WETLANDIMPACT AREA AREA
NUMBER (SQ. FT.) {AC.)
1 1,119.27 0.026
2 521.39 0.012
3 183,40 0.004
4 712.32 0, 016
5 6,358,69 0,146
s z,11o.97 a.o4a
7 3,321.42 0.076
a 1,96x,22 o.oa5
9 1,594.91 0.037
10 6,546.44 0.150
11 10,228,20 0,235
12 27,152.22 0.623
13 831.96 0.019
14 5,356.10 0.123
15 8,851.01 0.203
16 30,119,71 0,691
17 1,898,60 0,044
18 2,402,41 0,055
19 3,687.93 x.085
20 331.49 x.008
TOTAL WETLANDS 115,294.66 2.647
IMPACTED;
TOTAL NON•RIPARIAN 112,5fi4.88 2.564
WETLANDS IMPACTED:
TOTAL RIPARIAN y 729 78 0.063
WETLANDS IMPACTED:
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT: 70.0 L.F.
NOTE: WETLAND IMPACT NUMBERS 1-9
WERE APPROVED UNDER
NATIONWIDE PERMIT (NWP)
ACTION ID #200600208 DATED
JANUARY 16, 2007.
W
RIPARIAN
WETLANDS
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM CHANNEL
~~
~~
J~
#6
xom ~ v
#2
NOTE: TOTAL SITE AREA = 244.52 ACRES
EXISTING WETLAND AREA = 100.03 ACRES
PROPOSED WETLAND AREA (AFTER IMPACTS) = 97.38 ACRES
WETLAND AREAS IN CONSERVATION = 61.50 ACRES
CONSERVATION
CONSERVATION AREA #1
AREA #2 (30,56 ACRES)
(2.35 ACRES) I ~~~`
! /
#19 X13 ~
\ #12 ~ #11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'S~1
~:~~~
~i~?%
~~~
,,
~ '`
V =
7
Q a
L
Z=
r
Q ~
Q ~

m
a
0

0
a

~~\\~ WETLANDS~n d~
#15,
X14
404 ~
~~a/ #9 #17 ~8 ~
~~' ~~~
/ #7 ~
~6
LEGEND
HATCH/BOUNDARY AREA
404 JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS
IMPACTED NON-RIPARIAN
WETLANDS (NATIONWIDE PERMIT)
IMPACTED NON-RIPARIAN
WETLANDS INDIVIDUAL PERMIT
® IMPACTED RIPARIAN
WETLANDS (INDIVIDUAL PERMIT)

® WETLANDS CONSERVATION
AREA
LOTS WITH f00TPRINT RESTRICTIONS
CONSERVATION
AREA #3
(28.59 ACRES)
`2 #18
PROPOSED
AMENITY AREA
'
~ PA nnmmrv
~~ ~~ ~ 4
O~
za
~ o
~~ p 'LJURISDICTIONAL
EXISTING ~~~ STREAM CHANNEL
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT
SEE DETAIL 13 ~G~
SCALE: 1" =600'
600' 0 600'
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION,

~ 0.z
W
U
~ ~
~~
ti ~
~ ~~
~U
~
~ QpJ
F~ ~~

Q ~~ R~~
W
S
o
W 0
c~
W~
°aa
~
z a~.
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
0

N M
~~
N. ~ ~ ~ V1
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ W
~~

`"~ l ~ ~~~ ~~; ti~ ~ ~ +~ 113 N --
`„~ ~~:,: / ~ ''~~~ ~~ ti/ ~ 107 .~~
R :~ ~ o v
~ 1 ,~ ~ ~
';;. + r
`~>, 31 ;,,~ 32 9 ,,: ": ~ \ .'+ 112 Q m
,~ is ~ &
,; ~ a
.~~ /~ ~rv !~ NN 2~
9 ~~ 1 9 ~ ~: c a
/ z6 ~ ~; ,~ ~, ~ ; {
\ °z . 404 WETLANDS I ~ '; `~ _ ~' ~ . ,
`~ *` '".a t 111 d
.y ~ .,,.. 1 2 ~ ~ Q 1
77 ~ ~ ~ z7 ~-- ry s~ ~;n ,?~
VJ .S 2 ~ ~ / s N "'~ ~ ~
~ ti ~
~ ~ ''~ ~ TWO PROPOSED 24" CULVERTS
'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ NQ
BURIED TO DEPIFI OF 50X /' '1 > o Q
\ ~- ~ ~ rn DIAMETER OF CULVERTS (TYP \ o ~ ~
~ SEE DETAIL 2 1~ ~ / ~ ~ 4 s
13 ~` ~
I ~~
2 -- ~' Z"
8 \
74 k 1
2 z r
' ~ ~,
.:a
_ s~ # ~ S
~6i "~~ ~ ~ ~ / - ~ POND ~ o ~ ~ ~
T~IREE PROPOSED 6O CULVERTS ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~
/ BURIED TO DEPTi~ OF 50X OF ~ ~~ ~
/ ~ ,;"~ DIAMETER OF EVERTS (TYP.)
r;~°~ .SEE DETAIL 2 ~ ''~ ., w ~ 8
SCALE: 1 = 60 ~
13 ~2 60' 0 60' / a ~ ~ ~
,.,,'~ 404 WETLANDS N
- ``-- ~.- ,,~~ r~ -- -z 1 / // SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY ~~
--~ `- zs ~ ~ DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
~~
;.

I
-~.
\ ~/
iP
~3
X127 l/ /
w
J3a
125
~ -` 7\
/ ~~ ~
~ .~
~;.:
/y
~' ~ 31J /
~ ~-~•~°~
/.~Y ~~~ 1) o,
~ ~ ~ ~~
,; ~ ;, ~ ~
., , ~~ ~' ~
Y`4~ ~ I \
~z ~ a ~, / ~
~~~ ~
~`; ~G'`
124 ;~- ~'~ r
1 ~ _ 31
~'~~ ~ 34
~ \ ~ j•.
~ 3 `~.
~ ~ ~',~
\ ;l
/ 1 ~'~~I~''„ ' ,~
1 ,~,~ `4:~ ~,-
122 ~-
404 WETLANDS
~ ~~
a
f I
/~
1
1 ~
/ ` w
~ ~ i -,
~~, t.,.:~;,
~S~ ~ I ~~ :::-,
85 ,.
~,
1 .' ...
f ~r
1 '• _4
-'' ,x ~ 86
t

~ -.
,~
I
U

a
L
Q ~

Z ~
~. ~
Q ~ ~
> ~
Q ~

404 WETLANDS m
~ ~
o~
~ n ~ a
r
~
~
w _
~ °' z
U ~~

/S~
~ ~ N
~~N
~ U~
\ ~ ~
4~N
~_
,% ~
~~ o
>
o
.~
~ ~
W o
~
32 ~
c~ z~

120 > a 44~
~
Z 4

,
. ~ . ~ .
.
~y
3
;,;, .
.~,~,:,

~ o
~~ 9
~ g ~ ~ ~

.:~
30 SCALE: 1" = 50' ~ ~ ~ ~ I,,
50' 0 50'
31
~2
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUC1i0N.
~--, ~` 1~
~~
I G
gR~

~~ ~
/ \ A !'
-sir'
LP: 41.85'
4.08'/ 16~
i7/.a~~ i
~6J ~l~

~~
~ 154
/ ~~ /
57 ~~ ~ ,~
~ ~
o
% ~
I
\ \`~~
\I
~ ~
/ ~ ~~
J
1

,~~-~ ~l 1 1 ~ ~
( ~ 4~~1 l

,..~..~,, ; i..,. 111
HP: 42.83
X

~ ~ 1
w\ ~ \
~ ~ ~~
~ 1 ~ ~
~ ~ 1
'~-39~ /
/ ~'
-- ._ .~S ---"
~ 404 WETLANDS ~ .-
~ ~
\~
40 ~ ~\
\ 3g ~ SF \
1~ 1 ~\
~ 168 ~0 4~ f ~
' ~ Rio ~
~ 39
ss :;,,,,.J }_.. .F / ~ 171
~ .;t,.,.y4r - 172
'~~
~ ~ V I
40(4 WETLANDS ~ ~ ~
5
I / y
_ ~ F
a
.- I ~ ~ ~
y Z
a
j '~ ~ ~ 'G ~
Q~
.I ~ ,~.~ ~
m~,r ~ ~
. ~.a:,,,~, ~
Q ~
a ~
~, ~
0 A
0.
~ ~
/ 4
:.5~~..
\y,,r jl ~I' W z
~ az~
•;;;.
.,; U - w
~~ ~~~
t~~a J ~ ~ ~ N
~,.~. ~ ~
,;^ .
~ 36 ~ ~ ~
145 / ~ 3a "'`',. ~ ~~ a ~~
/ f ~ ~x aati
144 w "~ Q ~ o
1 Q
~ ~ z~~
3 ~ ~ yU~
S '> oQ~
o ~'
~ ~ 4~
~ ~~~
a ~~~
`~~
.___ d ~
x
h
~ ~
\ - ~
o~ ~
50' SCALE, ~» = 50~ 50' .. ~ x ~ W
j SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
~~
~ ~~~~

QO •'t"_
~~. "'~:
~ 1 2 LP: 43.26'
:; / ~
\ ~ ,,~ }
>,.
202 ~
,.j, ~~ 180
0
;~ ,,o~~/ ~~.a
'` ~~,~ ~ 178
~/ ~ ~
.. •`,,
~ 2O4 ~ ~~
..r~ ,~ ~ /dry a~/
- ~ > / ::~"
LP• 41.83' " / /
Y
"' ~ ~ t5 ~ ~ 195
/ ` ~
2a7 ~~ 206
~ ~ '~ J J -•
1 _._- -
/ ~ 37
-37
~~ / ~ __._
404 WETLANDS
SCALE: 1" = 60' ~
60' 0 60'
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
1 1 I J 1
166/ ~ ~
~~ ~
/ i ~,,
167 V I
/ •
~ / ~ ~
/ / / 16 ~
~ ~ ~40/ ~ ~
m
6
" TWO PROPOSED 15" CULVERTS- Q B. ~
177 ~ BURIED TO DEPTH OF 50X OF
DIAMETER OF CULVERT (TYP.) ~ ~ .~'
SEE DETAIL 2 ~' ~
13 ~9
`', / ~ ~
`~~- ~ 176 ~ 173 0
0 ! ~ o
l ~~
;:
~ ~ ~
1 ti~ ~ ~~~
t.Y~' ~ , y;; j ~ ~ U Z
~'N•.k LP: 38.59' q 4 Q
' ~
~ o
.,~ 39 ,~ ~ 4
p2

.,~ ~ ~ ~ z~~
~ ~ ~ ° ti
-~ twnU~
~
137 1 ~ ~ ~ a~
~7
~
~
~
^ s
~
~ i
~ J 1
w
~
/
J
PROPOSED 140 LF
~

+` ~ RETAINING WALL
' SEE DETAIL 4
~ 0
x
13 m n
~ ,
. ;
..,
"
i
5 ti ~ ;r N
n ~
~
H
y,~i. ~t i ,i /
l ~ 7~

404 WETLANDS
~F a; ,,r,rt ~ ~ ~
~~ .
.
~~
' ~~° ~

~; FUTURE PHASE TO BE GRADED \
+/- 5' TO EXISTNG GRADE AND ~
FOLLOW EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN
AS POSSIBLE, GIVEN PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS.
l l
\I
~~ ~p~
as
~~~
'e /
/ ~~~; /
~\
k k
rk
,(
~,~ /
/ ~ TWO PROPOSED 24" CULVERTS.S ~
,• . ~
BURIED TO DEPTH OF 50X OF! ~~~ _
DIAMETER OF CULVERTS (TYP. ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ °
SEE DETAIL 2 •~`a.> '~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
a4 g a
~;'i ~ 4 U
/ •r' ~
~ ~ _~,'F N xyt
' 404 WETLANDS ~%•. 4 ~~
404 WETLANDS

1\
17 SPACES
~~V1111~~
I
J
1
,r.~
r\,
1

1
I
~ ~ \ ,, ~
\ \ \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ •. I
~ ~ \~ ~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' r
1 \ ` Q m
~°-===°=~ ~ ~ Z ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~
~ ~ Q~
~~ ~ ` I ~ >
I ~ t Q
I ~ ~ ~~ ~
f ~ }
ppN
7
o' ` ~ N
~~ _ b
~~ ~
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY ~ ~
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION, \ W
~ ~ ~ U ~~
t ` \ ~ ~
~UN
S \ \ ~ t QQ~
@ 4
i- uz ~~ZQ
Q ~ ~
~~ pO~
r~ ` ~
Q~c~ES ~ ~ z ~~
~•~ > a° a
l \ ~ Q~
,~: ~ ~~~
1s. ;4,, ~ ~•~
~ ,a. ~ ~
~~ ~
~,

/\ / ~ / ' / I N N ~~•i
~ I
,, ~ ~ V I i
N ~ ~ / ~ K
--, Q° \ ~ ` 404 WETLANDS `
~~ \ \ ' { / / ~ W a ~
~o \~ l Q
~ ~ 2 TWO PROPOSED i5" CULVERTS / \ ~ \ m
~ \ \ 6\ BURIED TO DEPTH Of 5096 OF \ \ \ Z ~ ~
~ ~ \ DIAMETER OF CULVERT (TYP. 21 \ Q ro
\ \ ~' --27, , S SEE DETAIL 2 ~ ~ \ ~ .~ ~
3 \ 1 ~ 13 I ~ ,22 Q ~ ~
P \ ~ ~~ \ SCALE; 1" = 50'
~ w HP ~ ~ i0 ~ ?S \ ~ ~ 1 50' 0 50' ~2~
~ o ~' '~\
` ~ \ 26`^ 116 1 4 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
l ;;~ w ~ h N`0 DUE TO METHODS 0~' REPRODUCTION. w z
. .
., ~,,
'°: 104 .. ,~;~ .~x~,;~~,' :.,~+,,, ~ ~ 3 \ ~ ~ ; ~~
9 ~ ~ I ;~., ~ I ~ ~ , , ,
_ ~ ~ 1
~., :>,y1 ~ X05 ~ ~ ~ \ 1
~'~ ( ~ / .. ~ 114 , \
~ '~. 10 ~
,~"~ ~•,~ 1 \ z ~
,~ ~ \
`~ ~ ~~`g:~ ~ ~ / 106 N~:~. \ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~
~, 01 ~ '~~
-~ ~ ~~~ N 113
/ ~ ~ ~ 4a4 WETLANDS 107 ~ ~~~. ~;. ~

1 \ / ~ y,QIE~ FUTURE PHASE TO BE GRADED ~~ ,~y: \ ,,~
+/- 5 TO EXISTING GRADE AND \ •
404 WETLANDS ~ ~ FOLLOW EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN ;; ` V I
~,~ -- AS POSSIBLE, GIVEN PROPOSED ~y ~:;
5e~ I ~ ~ IMPROVEMENTS. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ \ ~ ~: j ~
~ ~ ~. m
,~ ~~~~~~ ~~ / Q t
/ ~ SPACES Y.... I ~ y
~ a \ ~ \ 11 e ~
\ 1 K~ /
~ ~ ~ ;~ ~
# 17 ~ ~ 1 ~ z
•~- .~~. TWO PROPOSED 15" CULVERTS I ~ ~ ` W a ~
,.;~). ~ ,
BURIED TO DEPTH OF 5096 OF ~~ ~ 38 ~ ~
F.;- DIAMETER OF CULVERTS (TYP.} ~ w ~ ~' o
` ., hx.'~:1, I SEE DETAIL 2 ~ ~ ~v~
s..,:.. / 9 3 ~ ~ 3 ti a Q o
,;..~ ~ ~ ~ a a Q
\ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~
,° ~' f
~°~ I TWO PROPOSED 15" CULVERTS / "~>4
BURIED TO DEPTH OF 50~ OF '`~4,... ""~..,,,
;,,
/ DIAMETER OF CULVERT (TYP.} \ ~~~-).. \ } ~ ~,~ ~
':r / SEE DETAIL 2 `"" ..~., ,
r ~{ r~
1 tit
~~~ \ o~ ~
`~A ~ \ ~ SCALE: 1» = 50' ~~~_;;;,, ~ ~
404 WETLANDS I I /~h 50 4 50 ~ ~ ~ x
U
~~ ~~~ ~~~
/ / ~ / . / /` SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY ~
,~ ~ J~ / DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. ~~
~ ~ G
EE

/ ~~~
~~~~~
~ ~ / '...
~/ ~;;,;, ~ ~ 4O4 .../
_ ~Y ,.,'., ;~,::. ,;, ..~. WETLANDS..
~ ;;: ' . , .
:; t
I
~~
1 ~ ~ J
l ~~ 1
.
50-- v,~~ ~
~~` ._ ~N
~~ , ~
~~
.- ~
6 ~~
6 ~ 19 ~ ~~
f ~
J
~s~ I~
sA~
~c
es
~ /
~J ~ ~
~ 6 ~
~ ~. ~ /
~ ~~ ~ ~~
~s`' ~
\ ~ ~ -'~
..
tiJ
/~
~~'+~:~.
~ •.~.,~ ~
~ '~r ,
`~ ~
~ ~ . ,, ~
~ ~. .~ _ i
I ~
'`~~~;,,
~u'~=~
~:,.
1 ~ .,:r..
.~,.
~ I \ '~
~ ~ ` 1
~, ~ ~ ~ /
~ ~
~ ~ 3
i / / ~ ~
~ ~ ~ /
~-' ~
~~r
_a~_ ~ / ~ / ~ ` ~
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY Y
J DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. w ~ ~
U ~~
w ~ Worn
~ J ' ~~^
K ~ ~ ~ ~V~
Q~~SO~,
W ~ 4a~
~ ~ ?~-Q
/ '~ w~_
' $ 4~
'~~g ~ ~ a ~
/ ~ ,3 ~ ~ . .
j a.,~
~ ~ ~
.~ / i ~ ~
~~. ~
~~ ~,.; ~
~~ ~ ~ M
-~. ~ /
.i•,, / n
f /
~ ~ ~ _ ~~
~ ~ ao4~ wEnANDS ~ ~ ~ a
~ ~~~~
~ ~~~
/ ~i ~ ~~
/ a E~'` ~
~: FUTURE PHASE TO BE GRADED
' TO EX
ST
NG GRADE AND .,~
I
I
+/- 5
FOLLOW EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN
GIVEN PROPOSED
S POSSIBLE V I
,
A
IMPROVEMENTS.
/ ~
~ s
a ~
/
Z ~'
~
s
s: ~ ~

~`
I J ~ W,
~
.~
;

~ ~ r
r ~~,
~~, ~ r
rn
_
1
t
~ ~

SCALE; 1" = 50' ~, o
N
o Q
1 50 0 ~
50
~
I ~ a

.,~.
~; / ' ~ J
'~~~b, ~f; 1 ~: FUTURE PHASE TO BE GRADED
'~. ~~ / l +/- 5' TO EXISTING GRADE AND V I I
,`'i.
'",t,, FOLLOW EXISING DRAINAGE PATTERN ~ n
~.. 3, ~ ~ ~ AS POSSIBLE, GIVEN PROPOSED
_ ~ IMPROVEMENTS. ~ b
,;, c
.i J ,y~ \ ~
.. /
. '~~ ' 404
.' ' WETLANDS /
~,, /
;'~i,7`,
.;)
.. ..,t. ~~;~ /
h„
TWO PROPOSED 48" CULVERTS ~ ~'`
BURIED TO DEPTH OF 5096 OF , . ~w,
DIAMETER OF CULVERTS (TYP.) '.~.~ ~,.,;. ' .
SEE DETAI 2 \'~'~:~:~ ~:
13 ;~~ ~' `~;~
...`~ . ~ „1 ~ti~

~ \ ~

.- -~\
~\
\ ~ 15 ``
\
~ TWO PROPOSED 48" CULVERTS '
\ BURIED TO DEPTH OF 5096 OF ~~
\ DIAMETER OF CULVERTS (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL\
~ 13
~-~ \ \ ~\~
~-
Q~
~ ~~
s~
m
~ ~ ~
C G
/ .- ~ SCALE; 1" = 60~ ~ ~ {
/ 60 0 60
/ d
n/
~~ SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCT101J, W a
~ z
~~
~ ~~
~~~
j wow
~ ~~ 4Q~
ti °Z QaQ
~ ~~ Doti
w °z~~
-~" `~- -~ 404 WETLANDS ~ ~ °w
~ ~ ~a
.-~ ~ w ~ ~
i I ~ a
~ ~~~
a ~~~
o: \ ~
~A ~ /
` .. ~ ~~ ~ ~
+ :.. ( ~i p
~4
~;, ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~1 H
^p ~ ~ O U
'Tl.. Sri
. ;,r.. ~ \~ \ ~~
~ :~ ~ ~ ,4

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
2'-10"
INNER RADIUS 37 3/8"
TOP RADIUS 258 3/4"
ALUMINUM BOTTOMLESS CULVER'
W/ WING WALL (WING WALL
SHALL BE DESIGNED BY ANI
BARE THE SEAL OF P.E. LICEN5E1
IN NORTH CAROLINA
NOTE:
NON-RIPARIAN
WETLAND LINE
APPROX. 20' AT
'MDEST POINT
CONCRETE FOOTING
PER MANUFACTURER'S
STREAM (UNDISTURBED) SPECIFICA710NS
(MIN. 4,000 PSI CONCRETE)
ALUMINUM BOTTOMLESS CULVERT TYPICAL FOR WETLAND
AND STREAM CROSSINGS. TO BE DE5IGNED BY OTHERS.
DIMENSIONS TO BE CONFIRMED P05T SOIL EVALUATION
FOR FOUNDAITONS,
ALUMINUM. BOTTOMLESS CULVERT OVER
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM NEAR NO HWY 10
DETAIL
cxo xor m rxt 10
RIPARIAN WETLAND
48" STORM FLOW/
HIGH FLOW CULVERT
IMPACT X12: ROAD CROSSING OVER SDI .710NA
STREAM. RIPARIAN. AND NON-RIPARIAN WE11 ANDS
DETAIL 3
r+ya xm m rxs 13
48" CULVERT WITH 2'
BURIED BELOW STREAMBED
'~i
I
~
u

NON-RIPARIAN
WETLAND LINE
r- VARIES NON-RIPARIAN
WETLAND LINE
~
a
r

VARIES PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE Z
Q
I I-II l) - II
.

I
I ~I~I
-I I ~I I I ~rJ
~ _
EXISTING GRADE
~~~~' .
~'

Q

8
.~ I- I I-I I I I
-
-I I ~i ~~I
l I I~ I ~ I ,
. I -1 ir,.l i
~ t
_
__
i - I
_-~I~iI-IH=II~III_ II III-1 ~I
-~~~~ 1~
~~ VARIABLE CULVERT TOTALS, SIZES, AND LENGTHS ~ W
= WITH AT LEAST 20% OF EACH PIPE BURIED BELOW WETLAND r
SURFACE FOR PIPES EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN 48", 60" PIPES N
ARE BURIED BELOW WETLAND SURFACE AT LEAST ONE FOOT. ii
SEE PLAN FOR PIPE TOTALS AND SIZING. IF MORE THAN
ONE PIPE, PIPES WILL BE SPACED AT LEAST ONE FOOT APART o
FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER, ~
NOTE: PER USACE NWP REGIONAL CONDITIONS, CULVERT INVERTS WILL BE
BURIED AT LEAST ONE FOOT BELOW THE BED OF THE WETLAND FOR
CULVERTS GREATER THAN 48 INCHES IN DIAMETER. FOR CULVERTS
48 INCHES IN DIAMETER OR SMALLER, CULVERTS MUST BE BURIED
BELOW THE BED OF THE WETLAND TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO OR
GREATER THAN 207 OF THE DIAMETER OF THE CULVERT.
TYPICAL RdAD CROSSING OVER
NON-RIPARIAN_ WETLANDS
DETAIL 2
~+~~ 10
r-3:1 M~
8'
BATTERED - I r 1~11IT ICI.
wAU:
..
z -

a I
_
~ -
z _
m
W
NOTE: TO 8E DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
RETAINING WALL SECTION
DETAIL 4
rya ~'+~~++~ 13
14" }3 BARS
-DEADMEN BEYOND
> BRACING TO
IMTH ,~3 BARS
CROSS BRACING
Lail
~
~ z
U ~
~
~ _
~
~U
~~ 4Q~
O

~ ~z
~~ Q
~~~
on

w ~ o
oa
~ ~ z~
b

a
J oti
_ a4
T 4~
B
a
M M
H
~ ~~ ~,~
x ~~ ~
D D
~~~
~'r~
~~
t~
,G
L
NON--RIPARIAN
WETLAND LINE
APPROX. JURISDIC110NAL
STREAM CHANNEL
RIPARIAN WETLAND LINE
48" STORM FLOW/
HIGH FLOW CULVERT
PROPOSED FNISHED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
BANKFULL WATER LEVEL
IN STREAM CHANNEL
a. ~~
4
„ ,,;.;-
r 1Pr q

~~:~b'~~Fs; .W'-~t~~k ~~ct~/ o~.D f ~ ~ ~,~la.~^~S'• pit
C ~ . ~} d. _ . _. _.

to cxr~e. 2 B
SCALE: 1 ~~ = 600
600 0 600
SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY
DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION.
`'~ ~2 JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM CHANNEL
#1
,(~ #7
#5 ~ #10 ~ #3 ~ _
,~ 1 II f I r ~1 s
- II X17
~~ ~® ®®® 404 WETLANDS,
X11 ~
#114 ` ~ ~® ,, ,, j' , s l ~''-i r'j t
~ X15 4~~'~~~ ~.:. ~,` ,~~ 1, ~~ , ~~ ; , ~~ i~
~ r':~I ~ ; ~ . ,, ; , , ~ ,,, , ;;
#19 ^ ~~ ~ llllllllll~I111I1(lllll~
404 ;;'ETLA"dDS
#1~~'
X20
#21
ti_..1t+
.~,,:
;,•,'`
,:~5 ,t~!
y ,ti ',i.,
Tf U .5, _,. S
t
:_ ~~
JURISDICTIONAL
STREAM CHANNEL
#22
'.3
#24
#25
l ~c~
_,, ,...
.~ ~,
Z ~
>,~o
Qo
~~
x~~
TRACT 1 - 292,A2J Sq, Ft / 8,725 Aaq
TRACT 2 - 159,985 Sq Ft / 3,872 Aare
TAACT 3 - 892,188 Sq F4 / 28,187 Aaq
iRACf 4 -2,882.898 9q. Ft / 88,459 Aaee
]RACY 5 - 4J5e,399 3q, Ft / 109,191 Aau
]RACY 8 - 1.704.117 Sa. Ft. / 38.195 Anew
TEA - 10,788,019 Sp. Ft. / 214.899 Auq
•.*~
~_
Q~ ;
i
Z m
Q a
4v i
z
1~l m 1
a 1
I
0 ~
~7 i
O
WETLAND IMPACTS FROM
ROAD CR0551NGS
WETLAND
IMPACT
NUMBER AREA
(SQ.
FT.) WETLAND
IMPACT
NUMBER AREA
(SQ,
FT,)
1 23,958,6 15 11,789.4
2 102,4 16 19,546.8
3 6,606,4 17 6,672,3
4 1,838.6 18 157,2
5 10,550.0 19 1, 851.7
6 3,954.8 20 3,188.9
7 21,220,2 21 2,118,1
8 139,2 22 1,036.2
g 929,5 23 5,706,0
10 6,177.5 24 257,0
11 40,7 25 921.6
12 1,768.0 26 7,456.0
13 467,0 27 495.9
14 4,001,5
TOTAL WETLANDS IMPACTED: 142,951.5
SQ.FT.
3,28 AC.
~
~ z~
s~~
o~a
ti ~~
~ how
~
~~ ~~~
~
~
~ ~~
°z~~
~ ~~O
3
~ 4
w ~
~
a ~ ~ ~
~
: ~ :

z
w
b
~ ~ ~
n o~
~~
,~
t: 1. 'I ;7-c 41e.i~~,..~ 7;._nat/xl C9t,A I ~I~ .rw„s,n4-c e_II'

..« .... f
.. .~_~ ` ~
r
/ / 1
/ f
/~ C
,i
~ ~~
//
S.v .vd d.e .v 9tl 4q ti'd~p 5
/ / . .,. ,`11` ~1 11 ~
,~~
J 1~
~~ ~~~
i~
U,~,~~
'>>~r~
i ~
', \
~!~U.I ~
!1llllj,:
(11~D
L.w~~~ `
~~ 1
~' , ~~
711~~, ~
i ~ !~ ~
U1111I ,,: j ~ f~ 1.
,_ ~ ~
i «~~
~/
/~
i
~ ,.
~~ ~~
C,~rt ~~ ~
~I ~~l _ [~
C~ ~
~~c~ ~~~
I,
V
\! '~!
~~

V~
n~
`~'
~~
~)

~,u~ ~*
/yv}
i
~' 0
~ 7
~~~ ~ o,
~? 0~~~
~'a ~~0 x(~ ~~
~~ ~ `,~ a ~
'~ ~;
.~ ~;
,~,~ ~ ~ ~
/ /
~~,
/r
i/
w
w~
U ti
J ~ ~^
w
~ ~~ z ~'--
tiN~Q~
D
Q~~ow
w a~ Q~
~ ~ °z
~ ~~
w
s~e~t uuue~u
.~
b O
n ~ 3
o y
~° a
~ ~~
~J ~'
~ ~ ~Q n
~~
~~ o
~~
a~ «~ _~

~ g
~ 1
/ /
I
~.
t
r ~
9.
/ ~ +~
b ~. SAd "d 9Sdyi y.p0 1
~ ~ ,~
1~ 6 ~I~ ~
f/) ~~ ~ ~
1~
d
A
~®~ ~~1
~~ ~~ t~~
~~~~ ,~
BD 9F71M~19 ~ a ~ 1) Qf IlL1 C1CC~j l ~ C:~ ~~.
~ 60 f (
9a a7 ui11s ~ / ~ ~ / 1~~
P9CPOSFIY.176 /~ ~ ~`~ ~)
~ (llllj~ Qllljj ~~ ~ C~j ~'Jl ~ ~ '~
01111 11111(~~ ~,~,~! ~~~ ~~~~(,~,~ , ~~
(111111,r,~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~'~l~
~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ` .s
~ i
\ ~
\ ~/ ~
~~
`\ ~
,, ,
.,
F i
W
Q a ~
r
rt
,'' ~ ~ ~
°~ ~
~'` i~ ~ .. ~ ^ i
~° ro
/ a `~eY ~ ~' a
~~
- Q m ~
~~- C
~, ~ .. ~ ~
~"4
/\~/f ~ d {
g 9.
9@lACfO LDIB ~ d
A76 - 77,OW 3/D,17 AC dyi9
~/ry7y~, J~ C~ A76 - ty601 3/0.81 AC N
,~rj )bsl ~ M
e~ `~"l J~
® ~ W6I 71.079
RD - 1,99v 3/0.18 AC
$~) )79 • 7.997 3/QIA AC
J ~~ O W }-
G® C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ " ~
(1~' i ~S
® s '' ~ ~ ~
~ra O ~7 ~ ou ¢FW-
(I,,~~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ J
~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ 0'~ ~ a ~
0 ,~~
`~~~ ~ ~ s
0 , .'Q ~ ~ ~
i j.~ Y ~ i~ V ~~~
q/I SHEET FlIhABER
~ r
~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~i~ ~
~,~~~~~ (~ e ~ ~ m
A4R677 lAEA ~
BffCNE ;1 AC (9;6]61 3~ CIrID f~ ~ ~ ~~
P9CPD$0 MYQI7Y ~~T JJJ 1`4•
NIFN 7.1 AC (9),.717 E~
~/~ ~ ~ ~
S7 J
~~ F
~ ~~ ~~~
~,~i~~l~~.+i,~,~~I~L~I~~,,,~~~ ,~ ~ o `tea ~1~1-,~~,.d~~ ~LL ~

t~ti,.
i
A. ,
:i
NOTE: TOTAL SITE AREA = 244.52 ACRES
EXISTING WETLAND AREA = 1pp,O3 ACRE5
PROPOSED WETLAND AREA (AFTER IMPACTS) = 97,34 ACRES
WETLAND AREAS IN CONSERVATION = 61,50 ACRES
lNON471PATaAN WERAND, RIPARfAN WE'TLANn, AND
S112EAM I M PACTS PROh1 ROAD CR04SING5
WETIANDIMPAC7 AREA ARFA
NUM~R 15C.FTJ (AC.1
3 1,11427 OA26
521.39 Oa12
103,40 aaD4
71z.3z oam
8,356.09 0146
z,11o.07 Daae
3,311,42 O.a76
1,BC622 D.046
1,694.81 0.097
8,646.44 0.150
1a,1262D 0.235
27,16222 0.623
B31,D6 0,018
7,631.27 0,179
aa6tol D,zoJ
30.1iD.71 D,691
1,OOBOD D,044
1:40241 0,055
9,6o7.s3 o.aes
117,13495 2,689
114,A06.67 2.fi16
2,729.78 a,asJ
70,9 L,F,
~..
tI
U
14°
N
1;
Z~
a
a~~
Q E
m
U 2
0
N
0
3
O
N
~h3EA5 1-i N£Af ORIOA4AllY
110HN10E PERMIT (NNP)
fi DATED ~AHVARr 1e
Eoo7.
~
d ~ ~
, U
~ z
~~~
ti ~~a
U
~~
~ wz
ago
~
~ ~x ~~a

~ ~~ zU~
~
~ zQ
~
_
~ o~g
2 a3
F- 4
~'
s
x
0
a
5NEET NIINBER
C.1,1
DpN-EPACIm'EANO NfAD
CAVS~ERLYA7DION AREA
(ACRE5)
1 x.59
~ 3,J5
J 28.09
~
A
BFA fi1.SD
CONSERVED
nniu~ uwranxi AAEA
® 404 JUPoSOICTH)NAL
NEDINDS
WPACDD NCN-RIPAAlAti
Y,EiIANDS pv,naNwgE PE1Gll1)
~~ dIPACTED NON-AN'ARIAN
xa7Ex+o5 (fF~MDUK PERMIT)
® DMACiFD I~APoAN
WERAlAS (INgMDUA1 PERMIYJ
® V,EILANDS COHSEAVAl1CH
AREA
LD1$ 1A1H FCO1PPoNi RESiRIC11pN5
~~~~ ~ ~ ~
~~r~~
o~ ~
x
SCJIt: I' ~3D8' a
SGME aF YAP YAYYARY
a>E ro YEnlaus aF RfPpOp,
~f'~ ~~

t
~~g~~ ~F
t
NOTE: TOTAL SITE AREA = 244.52 ACRES
EXISTING WETLAND AREA = 100.03 ACRES
PROPOSED WETLAND AREA (AFTER IMPACTS) = 97.19 ACRES
WETLAND AREAS IN CONSERVATION = 61.50 ACRES
s,,
~s T
~I
U
I ~ a
t
rn
ti
Z~
a
n
Q ~
d
C
Q _~
L
m
0
L
o~
O
O
0)

IMBERS 1-9 WERE ORIGINALLY
ATIONWIDE PERNIT (NWP) W 2

~ O
0.
!OB DATEO JANUARY ifi, 2007. ~ Q ~
W
U ~~?
i ~~v~j
~
~ ~'~ ~Q~
~
U
u
~ ~~ 2
W
~ O O
~ y2 J~ ~
Q °z OWE
(/) ~ o
~ ~a ~ 2 ~
ZOO
w
w
pp
~ O
W~Q
'> ova
3~
W
ti o
a

~.
°
Uy
W
O
CONffRYATION AREAS
(IlpldvAClm r[nvm ~
wE1uNO AREA
CONSERVATION (ACRES)
AREA NUMBER
1 30.58
2 2,35
3 28.59
TOTAL
AREA 81.50
CONSERVED
HATCH BOUNDARY AREA
404 UJRISDIC110NAL
WEn.ANDs
WPACTED NON-R~ARIM!
® WENANDS (NA110NN1DE PERMIT)
MPACTr~ NON-RIPARIAN
WETLANDS QNDIVOUAL PERMIT)
GAFACTW RIPAPoAN
WETLAtmS (INDIMDUAL PERMIT)
® Wt-TLANDS CONSERVA110N
AREA
LOTS YA1H FOOTPRINT RESTRICTIONS
2G
f
/~
SCAIE: 1' .J00'
3D7~3(10'
SCAIE OF MAP WAY MIRY
DUE TO IE1fI0DS OF REPROOUC11011
N~JN-fL'PAFOAN WFft.AND, RIPARt.AN WERANO, AND
STREAM IMPACTS FROM ROAD CROSSINGS
WcMNDIMPACT ARFA AREA
MJME+EIR ESO. FT.) (AG.)
1 1,119.27 0.026
2 521.39 0.012
3 163.40 0.004
71232 0.016
6,355.69 0.146
2,110.97 0.048
3.321.42 0,076
1.966.22 0.045
1.594.91 0.037
6,548.44 0.150
10,228.20 0.235
77,15222 0.623
831.98 0.019
7,531.27 0.173
8,851.01 0.203
30,119.71 0.691
tesB.sa ao44
2,402.41 0,055
3.687.93 0.085
1,9.68 a.o44
4,707.85 0.108
123,76287 2,841
121,029.09 2778
2,729.75 0.083
70.01„F.
EL
C
SHEET NUMBER
C.1,1
h Z
a

0
3

ry 0
g
W
~
~ •~
a Zo

m U WW W
wi ~ U' v W
~+~