820714_Inspection_20200825

ID 1r t> -p. •.- `-U t - - -
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number C3 Z - 7j i{ 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: i Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ;.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: MAWS Arrival Time: ' Departure Time: /S3(mot I County: S* SQ/0 Region: F✓lv
/
� ll[
Farm Name: f. u4 t L ra-V)^'L Owner Email:
Owner Name: .5 14 U Jq a `I rc4 LLj Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (j I c 5 a,e,w ,C f Title: Phone:,/
Onsite Representative: l Integrator: _ l /E')
Certified Operator: IS vAitCeb It, 1^f 10a-0 Certification Number: l ql 2-6
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean f b(jt [ati c Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
•
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys -
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 120 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No �N ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No []NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑'N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z 7/`i Date of Inspection: 40c '&iD
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes LE< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ( i ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes l o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 13- o El NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptablee Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): V S (4���-e(
13. Soil Type(s): (,am _ I GL(A_
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable 0 Yes 04 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes III/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Erlo ❑ NA IT' NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e2- -7/y Date of Inspection: i;Z3 4(2(:9-2ej )
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ILKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Q'�o 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑//No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes CIK1-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 0 Yes go ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 04o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CAA;(4/19,1 11)-- / - 1� 66 ee, su cf(,,e7 -1 1 -).5 - / 7 o _ 3, 1 p— 3, Z_ c(6
1 --1--N...tz,e. ---1) co t''-' kl c
c� 1--A000.--i 'c
,,A__
RetV4,5 1.?-,ea, ev 1 s vii, ,\ vo,t, g ( R5 on .LA 4, Sile rilSp-€4701
c„6it cit - ' I . 3 3 3 (f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: g L a r),9\41(41) Phoned*(-t3` 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: A (-) C) WLt bp Date: 15 A V C,-- -20
7,0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015