820700_Inspection_20200707

Q.fjvision of Water Resources 81 S =��U I_9/
Facility Number e 2_ 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency r
Type of Visit: &Kim fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
1
Date of Visit: % c Arrival Time: f h'-( 5 J- Departure Time: f2/i5r' County:SMP5 Region:
Farm Name: 6IA5S o.`tit /-I-` C, Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0 IA 4X'\ 5 , PDc�- fl/ t.I r/ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 4T (-*M' c;� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t i Integrator: 11L.
Certified Operator: I n C°1-4`' W k. IIt- Certification Number: I L' e /7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish •Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 7'J 00 i i3 1p Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca 8 aci Po s. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
IMEMEMEM
Other •Turke Poults
Other II Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No [f NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Erco ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: @ - `] 00 Date of Inspection:Sj�,/,(ti
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)'less than adequate? ❑ Yes Fallo- ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No la< ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): -
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IZKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental hreat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �—,,�
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): S-- �(,0 C(.4,y
13. Soil Type(s): ( , .'v7 G� l
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ir No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes EiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 121<io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections, ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes []/ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ] NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: KZ - 7670 Date of Inspection: J7 -7-(24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ ]-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
azy(ii,^(444° -1 I 3 (al.& 54-4,vtin /-04,1/47 (ie., 7
C-au 9,i o ` S(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 0 0/JAI) ) Phone:C(tC—433 33 31
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1j Le Date: .13VL `�v
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015