820699_Inspection_20200818

(PDivision of Water Resources 1 �,i 1 Q �r1V 7o
Facility Number 2 - G�ct l 0 Division of Soil and Water Consery t o l to
0 Other Agency
r
Type of Visit: Com fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: -(0 Al2(2 o''Arrival Time:`'R 4 Departure Time: ixc 4, County: ,5411'1,r'CV f Region:Fg 0
Farm Name: J 0 Ilk 3 0 C(3e-5 !d 5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: ..) a,vtlr-5 1S L 't?'S f Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 001 l Il I it's-d Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: (I- Integrator: 1 D WL �,tAv- $
Certified Operator: t'( Certification Number: /e ( 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer _Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 2.6ca a.5 l-j Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers_ Beef Feeder _ _
' Boars _ Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA El NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes El No L NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA` El NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) El Yes 0 No 06-Id ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 02C ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters El Yes To ❑ NA El NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z- 4," C( Date of Inspection: /e U 7E2 Z-d
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): -
Observed Freeboard(in): 8 7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E'Nv ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a E Yes 1'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes EI 1"0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1114Cro ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0' ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C (J 9 & V k) P
13. Soil Type(s): LJc�
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA n NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [k< ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ONO— ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑Tlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: p Z- 6 l Date of Inspection: ( y) t'o-20 2P
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE)
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes J 1 -- ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑fi!o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0:126 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
7
t.e..e.s '3 7
c q i o 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: c i�� V l* Phone: V—L(3 -3321
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J32 ( / Date: j ` 411,7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015