820696_Inspection_20200812

, Jb 77O
O Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - - w O Division of Soil-and Water Conservation
O Other--=Agency z ; ,
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: p Arrival Time:I/A'qz30 Departure Time: / ,'OD County: Region:
Farm Name: f p/?- G Z-j V ,S'7?GA pL i" r`'Owner Email:
Owner Name: T 7l r C.. I j i V ,4k C� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: � j^-��� 1,Y Title: r,,,,,r Phone:
Onsite Representative: 172 f>-/C Integrator:
Certified Operator: � Certification Number: 2
Back-up Operator: (4',/,. Certification Number: /e0(7/�
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design�� Current-- •_ m Design Current -Design, Current
Swine _Capacity Pop.,, Wet Poultry Capacity Pop::,, Cattle °, Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean • Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca'aci Po..' Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars • Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
• Other 3 - •Turke Poults
Other •Other •
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes io ❑ NA El NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: A'3,, - to.9"(® Date of Inspection: K-- ,?*-- ✓T"
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE '
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: )e-)s 7 /Z-44
Spillway?:Designed Freeboard(in): di / /q
/9
Observed Freeboard(in): % 3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. - ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window / ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): ,R wev dl c,i/ vr' -� /e,f'/'I
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 24 ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 2r/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: V-- Date of Inspection: / --
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [l]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes LJ l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12K10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to.iquestion#).explain any YES answers and/or any additional-recommendations or any othercomments:'
Use drawings of facility toietter explain situations(use additional pages as necessary),
z. u��l d- Och�` Cc '7�')r ( c z-c/( G)5 77
111-5 —WV/ AL-j—
f/x �, ;
C G am
Reviewer/Inspector Name: $7(—. Phone: 9/4 3'O3i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: "4/ Date: "`--/;,2_- ,a
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015