820692_Inspection_20200707

e viskin of Water Resources -
Faeil ' Number p' _ a- .pinisira' ��,c��,. ,�p Z 0 Division of Soil and Water Coervation
_- , 'O Otlier Agency -
Type of Visit: . aelim liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ``7 54.� Arrival Time:rl Departure Time: 06' r County: NPIIP 54/V Region:Pff
Farm Name: )A,Nl'fY'cS v'&J7L Sbi.,. r�t. .--, Owner Email:
IT Owner Name: cx�w dd'M. 144tek I nC' Phone: •
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: A- I &frd-oL Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: A 1'1f Integrator: (114 IS- $
Certified Operator: Kt:4Ne- £4 il-k$ t Certification Number: 2.6 O Z 8
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
P .Design Current' 'Design` Current ' Design Current
Swine , ��jCapacity Pop. - Wet Poultry,: Capacity Pop. Cattle a Capacity Pop. `
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder G4(9 y S I Non-Layer • . Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 12.12-if I a Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 41-1&Z pt i-((, (/1 Design Current Dry Cow .
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca•aci . Po•. _ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish -' Beef Stocker
Gilts - •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars 13© •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Other - e 1 •Turke Poults
Other = II Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yesr] NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No TA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No J NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 12, ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes L__I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: L. V2Z^ Date of Inspection: J u(�, ,741
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ I<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No iA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): r
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 4To ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Wallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Ic El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C.-13 S�' v �/44 y
13. Soil Type(s): 3 �.ptko T19�'jGt-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 11 ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have-the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check 0 Yes ,rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes [`'To ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Oil No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - &20— Date of Inspection: 70--yfrt 221
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? (( ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cetilltvdtz \ 9(.1-d7-e— 56.1.v7/-N g_r,5--_
c.4 01,(0- l Dgic-5(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: c" OV � it p
y
Phone: (,t(b it(33
-33
C
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G Date: Jul Z 0 n
Page 3 of 3 2/4/20I5