820677_Inspection_20200729

0-Illvision of Water Resources (3 I yh 5 1 5Itit
2_.9 LO
Facility Number e �, - 677 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation l (�'�
0 Other Agency l� V
Type of Visit: 0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: [^ routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1039 4 Departure Time: )4,jb 13 County: : 1'tf 12 Scb l Region: -1Y
Farm Name: 11,u4�P.e4 '�-rt Li ►�(s ` ` It( Owner Email:
Owner Name: -6 oc.'fd L°vl (-tc- ` l/ t--, NMS IyC Phone:
Mailing Address: 111
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CCPA`s 13 • 1 G4 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1( Integrator: 7 .tr`e-S/4 -e_
�
Certified Operator: ,�-y� y 0,,,,,,Pei� ,"t�e i Certification Number: d 37D
�
Back-up Operator: 1 Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer •Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish ,I Li lv 1Qc9 Dairy Heifer .
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. 'Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers •Beef Feeder _
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
•
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other i
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes MI . ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ I�A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑-IVA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ! to ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes IEK ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e 2, - 7 l Date of Inspection: C( t f r lr 9ty-;_)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ O ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No E 141 ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):Observed Freeboard(in): 3 Z
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [l V ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [f].l‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0,1'W-5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes aVI'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C 8 S G 0 /- +P
13. Soil Type(s): (i r't l yO f(A 11,00 0
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 10 El NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑-10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes To ❑ NA El NE
acres determination?17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 17K ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lE1 No ❑ NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists El Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. \ ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes Id No ❑ NA El NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e A - Date of Inspection: ,may i-4' 11
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes aria? ❑ NA 0 NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes IZI,KrEl NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes In4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? 0 Yes 0"1C ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes /1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes L❑-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 13,14- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®-O ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes - No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
tiso4
Cal,(b 61"-N I S tff. -G'kt-J2y.e gc-,(7&'eei I / 91 If 0— Rtq, F-, 3 7
Reviewer/Inspector Name: tTj j`,I y� `�, Phone: 33
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q� C/, Date: q9'6(�I •- J (�
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015