820667_Inspection_20200731

vision of Water Resources 13140 3 A-0C7Z-O2.t7
Facility Number &.. - 6 67
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 1 j�J 0
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Cbm fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 'U Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
_ lDate of Visit: ��j;,�, Arrival Time: j!�Ll .i4' Departure Time:�� County: �' -Y11�d►11 Region: l
Farm Name: L 9, 4e— I-a hats `LG ` LR t it Owner Email:
Owner Name: Cc h c — 0t,1. ,5 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: l
Facility Contact: e4,00f•15 6etc k1LO Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ( Integrator: P(' - f1`e
Certified Operator: .V D\C -1 -P ei If a x$a Y Certification Number: 60 6-6 70
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 6-15 ((J b 7,' Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow _
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets _ Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [lIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [�N ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes E No [fNA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 111110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: eg 2 6(-"/ Date of Inspection: 3(rja7 -A70
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Epro-'❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No A— ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0' ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑-O ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ETo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): h go Cr c)
13. Soil Type(s): No GI AA, (lc'
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ] To ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes alac ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ 4 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [1]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard' ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather;Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 2,- t7 Date of Inspection: A Zg
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes MAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes agr ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
El Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 111' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [J2o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes `d" ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes aio ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(446thitkIV\ 1'19 ctc-0.7
337e
a),Dhitk-er‘,9.,,,10 51.1-c-i ecS r ee ► `°`l i 14 6\ FOCI-- 4)/f ��j�r w4i t t,&
q,/10-3 a e- v 433-33
Reviewer/Inspector Name: L t'l r3
014 L t7 Phone: tO`3 of 46 8_c(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: v Date: ��iiit,(, 2Q
L�ti� L
Page3of3 2/4/2015