820656_Inspection_20200722

�, - : ; C'�Division of Water Resources r' �
,Facili�t-y Number -�2 - 6�� 0 Division of Soihand Water Conservation -
_ ()Other Agency ��
Type of Visit: ('Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tcRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: a.Z 3(.1y ai :0 Arrival Time:maw Departure Time: f k)l)r County: 9 t1C0 j'0 Region: .-*y
y� t
Farm Name: 4 ' J1 L1 Ut lt '& 1 t(1 C J '-T Owner Email:
Owner Name: Z Jk j4 —(.�4llCfi( Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: /J /!
Facility Contact: kg 6ett/l ec1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: y-�S�'
,
c(
Certified.Operator: l Y Certification Number: 9 ( -f lL
(8
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
`Design Current - ';Design 6'Current '.'!.;,Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle . - Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish s-7 b0 '�(6a , Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ,-Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca'aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
_Farrow to Finish M . - Beef Stocker _ `
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars - ,II Pullets Beef Brood Cow _
Other I.Turke Poults
Other II Other �� '
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure 0 Application Field ❑ Other: �/
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1.260 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ?Z-. - 6 5,1, Date of Inspection: z���y 20
Waste Collection&Treatment �,, �
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes c L❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): n
Observed Freeboard(in): 40 �s
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes al‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 11 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 04 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No • ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of
n Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): l� �J `-�b D .N4 v
13. Soil Type(s): >7 6 NO CI 6J0,-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes . 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes C9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes El N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z - 6 5,E Date of Inspection: 2j.tiC� 1""
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes L_n 2 e ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Eke ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 04 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
bj► —9:- sl�� s� E.Q.ey— s� I.
or
43 3iet 47
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 tl � VIl.ct-F Phone:GU _IJ3".33 311
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 3 l.XFU Date: aa. J( zo 2-0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015