820652_Inspection_20200813

•
•
. , w ,.. �
:4t _ .,,.. x s t NAl int_o t NM i ,0 ; - �er
-
! v^^� ' �- ss = f a
K>:tf-w� y * rh� m' l L �: ii-ri i 9£ Z w- vap Oie-i � as k-g . es., , r
pe of Visit: '�!) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ason for Visit: a Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Others ��0 Denied Access (/
to of Visit: 1,3 pc, 2 c Arrival Time:1.7 �'Departure Time: i County: 'I14 1 Soit Region: - I
rm Name: c4- 'i 56 0 304-v-- SI' c Owner Email:
vner Name: 44' k lJ(C✓tt `1.— Phone:
ailing Address: 1
ysical Address:
cility Contact:, tC,(A-4,`C( lud(t/Ins Title: Phone:
( , t
isite Representative: U. Integrator: 114(? S- c 41`��`z�e ij
3
;rtified Operator: j..-I 4-ok hi©l)ley Certification Number: -G Zs j
I '
Lek-up Operator: Certification Number:
3
(cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 1
I
3
it`4 rn c_ "' ''c c -Ta 4re:6 a ',.:Y ,'`,'ec-. -a 14. -, is �,-,- 41 ` .,€.' �' ., Z`' ,az ?t
,F 4- ' �"' 'c x. s, ,.mot � - .s � '�x� t.� 1 s !
�t, k 0}+ r y s t a a ° n t^ * ,
r.` �. s °: �'� .: :� ,. .�l1ULa
• Weanto Finish er r IN Dai Cow *� ,
11. Wean to Feeder ' ; .Non La er Da' Calf
' Feeder to Finish � � : �,. ` • Dai Heifer ;
Farrow to Wean `s-� � D ,�' •D Cow
Farrow to Feeder » s s+ iao t pp)) Non-Da'
Y i■
x'
Farrow to Finish ,Layers x Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
4 Boars cvO a-- Pullets ,Beef Brood Cow
" e' '{ z a 4 a�- ■Turke s •' - r ,A tr? ` -&'1 `t . � :
S. ` .'- Z'': MI Turke Poults • —:Nz.A,.. f ,r ?`
IOther Other -- fi
.� ':iry s+}F ., a y µ ., US,�=.
1�G�� �.�:,. -;s^,�=:� �:��,:t>r ;: �;��:� -u,� ��"..arr�-�zxis��.ca���c�s��=x�A:�.=z = ':.ra ":a�i-� '+�; .r� _"cc�..tr _w��a� �-`h t..t.s M ,:g
►ischarges and StreavA
m Impacts
.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑-Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No II NA D NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? .
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No '' NA ❑ NE
P..Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ 1 To ❑ NA ❑ NE
{.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E N 0 NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
1
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 In S Z, !Date of Inspection: /34126 zd z=d
Waste Collection&Treatment •
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0-icrr ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑-'T ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): -
Observed Freeboard(in): 3-1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? • ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes In o Li NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ©-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes akil5 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? ,
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
� ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): .r AisG"( Lat.!4 (1
13.Soil Type(s): Ca..-(4 P y--
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [f'f10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ 11❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable Li Yes p)T( ❑ NA D NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records &Documents -
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes- ❑— ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes El-NV- ❑ NA Li NE
the appropriate box_
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ e— ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ['Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [I 1 IC ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Li Yes E No ❑ NA Li NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: .3 2.,- (o,s'7, Date of Inspection: /3 A}w zo .
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [J1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
El Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?. ❑ Yes r ►.• ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes (2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes .No ❑ NA ❑ NET-
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑'l Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. - El Yes Q4lo ❑ NA El NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'pit ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 17!No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 0111 No El NA El NE
Comments �refer._to uestion-# : lam;.any YES:answers and/ox:any additional'recommendaliousocany otlier;,-canuneiits
` .:to:tietter:�e �lairi;situation :use=sdcL _. _... .�.�.,_1'y)��::, 1:;_..-�<<�i:.�_;..�.�.�:i -�r;.
Tse=d��vvrigs.�,of facility. __..........-gP� .�.. ... . ... ...�:( ..,.., �-_.-._�. .__.�P .g ... ,
' 1\tc, A--ko,r•
b ( Vk ‘-�. et irsi
tA) c\ ct It . C-
C A (.7r �,(0`2 0? - 7 5(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: C(t 00 vu • PhoneN L2 C 3 3 c33 (
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: e IZ
de '`' .) tuttly Date: 13 Pf-4. —2-v20
Page 3.of 3 2/4/20'15