Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820644_Inspection_20200825 =/-r� ivision of Water Resources Facility Number y� - te 1/1( 0 Division-of Soil and Water Conservation `-- 0 Other Agency - Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: elroirtine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: $ j=,,(AD Arrival Time: ('',OD, Departure Time:1 J;w County:_. , Region: FTD Farm Name: 3C -�' �' Owner Email: y'' Owner Name: 7,1,14.e. -/ ."— Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Z flee T °'-- Title: Xle✓f7 e"P Phone: '� Onsite Representative: -<L�-E_ Integrator: �: / J �L'� Certified Operator: c-- ,t€-P-." Certification Number: /i5 lJ/P cr— Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine :Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.: Cattle; Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder ,� 190 Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca s aci Po s.,- Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish • -- Beef Stocker Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow Other II Turke Poults Other •Other , �� -- Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: - a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE ..-- 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes LI No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: - 91-( Date of Inspection: — - ' Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes []-I(o ❑ NA El NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a El Yes Ef< ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or env' nmental thr•at,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? �' ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes CJ NO ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Eio ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P/No ❑ NA El NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) El PAN El PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): /�jy,7r 4 ! /2 , j --rJ 13. Soil Type(s): ft,/`o- 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes LI31<o ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E'�io ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps El Lease Agreements El Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ['Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E N//o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [�'No El NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: r2--- ('c(L( Date of Inspection: ^ , � ? 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility yto better explain situations(use additional pages as inecessary). rn7Y c Y 2 ii 5'7i�-S r / J- - 2 C�lam' C2 tJ up d -&O P c,ra( 4;5717 Reviewer/Inspector Name: G� LI Phone: 9-4 30-3''0(Jrf Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: F.:72��� 7 Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015