Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171045 Ver 1_RE Notice of Initial Credit Release_20201201Strickland, Bev From: Kristi Suggs <ksuggs@wildlandseng.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 8:18 AM To: Kim Browning; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Haywood, Casey; Leslie, Andrea J; Davis, Erin B; Wilson, Travis W.; Hamstead, Byron A; Bowers, Todd Cc: Aaron Earley; Shawn Wilkerson; Reid, Matthew; Wiesner, Paul; Allen, Melonie; Harmon, Beth; Stanfill, Jim; Scott.C.McLendon@usace.army.mil; Smith, Ronnie D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA Subject: [External] RE: Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Key Mill Mitigation Site/ Surry Co./ SAW-2017-01504 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to report.spam@nc.gov Good Morning Kim! I just wanted to send a quick note to acknowledge the receipt of the IRT's comments in reference to the Key Mill Mitigation Site's As -built Baselined Monitoring Report and Record Drawings. We have reviewed them and will incorporate our responses in the MY1 Report, as requested. In addition, Wildlands will include a copy of the email received with the IRT's comments in the Appendix of the report. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me either by phone or email. Thanks! Sincerely, Kristi Suggs Kristi Suggs I Senior Environmental Scientist 0:704.332.7754 x110 M: 704.579.4828 Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203 From: Aaron Earley <aearley@wildlandseng.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 8:30 AM To: Kristi Suggs <ksuggs@wildlandseng.com> Subject: Fw: Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Key Mill Mitigation Site/ Surry Co./ SAW-2017-01504 FYI From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 2:28 PM To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<Todd.J.Tugwell@usace.army.mil>; Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA) <Casey.M.Haywood@usace.army.mil>; Davis, Erin B <erin.davis@ncdenr.gov>; 'Wilson, Travis W. (travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org)' <travis.wilson@ncwildlife.org>; Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org>; 'Bowers, Todd (bowers.todd@epa.gov)' <bowers.todd@epa.gov>; Byron Hamstead <byron Hamstead@fws.gov> Cc: Reid, Matthew <matthew.reid@ncdenr.gov>; Aaron Earley <aearley@wildlandseng.com>; Shawn Wilkerson <swiIkerson@wild landseng.com>; Allen, Melonie <melonie.allen@ncdenr.gov>; Wiesner, Paul <paul.wiesner@ncdenr.gov>; Harmon, Beth <beth.harmon@ncdenr.gov>; Stanfill, Jim <jim.stanfill@ncdenr.gov>; McLendon, C S CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Scott.C.McLendon@usace.army.mil>; Smith, Ronnie D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Ronnie.D.Smith@usace.army.mil> Subject: Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Key Mill Mitigation Site/ Surry Co./ SAW-2017-01504 Good afternoon, The 15-Day Record Drawing review for the Key Mill Mitigation Site (SAW-2017-01504) ended November 11, 2020. Per Section 332.8(o)(9) of the 2008 Mitigation Rule, this review followed the streamlined review process. All comments received from the NCIRT are incorporated in this email. Please address IRT concerns in the MY1 Report. There were no objections to issuing the initial credit release. Please find attached the current signed ledger. DWR comments, Erin Davis: 1. In the IRT mitigation plan review, Mac echoed DMS' comment regarding the usage of log sills on steeper gradient tributaries with consideration for long term channel stability. WEI's response was to revise construction plans to incorporate more boulder sills. Given the high number of substitutions back to log sills, DWR's concern still stands. These areas should be closely inspected during monitoring for signs of instability. 2. DWR is ok with the planted material species and quantity substitutions, except for green ash. If green ash dominated areas establish during monitoring (based on plot data and site visit observations), DWR may request supplemental planting based on long term canopy closure concerns due to the emerald ash borer. 3. DWR does not believe the change in planted area warrants a reduction in ratio of credits. However, if construction equipment used for the restoration reach entered the forested buffer, then the area should be monitored for signs of woody vegetation stress/death and supplemental planted as necessary. 4. There appears to be multiple riprap swales/outlets shown on the record drawings but not the approved mitigation plan design drawings: Sheet 1.6— BMP outlet near 155+00 and floodplain riprap near 155+75, Sheet 1.7—vernal pool/BMP outlet near 159+75, and Sheet 1.9 — outlet near 165+75. Please call these areas out on future redline drawings and provide a justification for the hardening measure in the baseline report. Please contact the mitigation office if you have questions. Have a good weekend, Kim Kim Browning Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers