820632_Inspection_20200814

r3' '_ (:;2-7::,
fly -
�}��
- m Division of Water Resources
Facility-Number 6.3� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
, 0 Other Agency ,_s w :riX
Type of Visit: la'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: effiLtine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:j/ �U Arrival Time: 7rGf I" Departure Time: a' O County: , Region:
Farm Name: /B-2rn n/��/v i In K ljyt : Owner Email:
Owner Name: 7 55 4 04 C Phone: '
Mailing Address: /
Physical Address:'
Facility Contact: y./gry 7�11/9 --"r Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: sG - Integrator: G f? i
/"1l"„. e
Certified Operator: '1 // �:. jc Certification Number: `672�4
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
° Design Current , Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. ' Cattle`. Capacity Pop ,°
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder � /oE ® Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D °Poultr Ca 1 ad Po' , • _Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish • ' * Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers --, Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets , Beef Brood Cow
Other. `. Turke Poults
Other •Other t - =-- ?L ,' , .
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the.State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I2< ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters - El Yes 12Klo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: .0-_ C.,3 -4 Date of Inspection: fr,--«--;7,9)i2re7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / g
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑'Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,__,,�
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area
12.CropType(s): /7 � J/093 Z;7‘74.7',6x-77ii
�sv
13. Soil Type(s): `IT44p7-7 j
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 17I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [l]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes [INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 1214 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ['Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12. 3 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes r J l� ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes EINTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: ems!
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
25.Is the facility-out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes la-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IJ4To ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA El NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA El NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ICJ<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 2r<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes El NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility toibetter explain � Wsituations(use.additional pages as necessary).
�
,;14` ece) Ai / S�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �`--® Phone: �V;3 D3-0 L'
•
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ' I Date: `1q1:7-27
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015