820626_Inspection_20200807

©tiivision of Water Resources 6 l9 II (,,i)( � 4)
Facility Number 8 - 624 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 4`I
0 Other Agency 15
-0
Type of Visit: ®-Co ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine ,0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:',ga Arrival Time: itsPi\ Departure Time: GAfi-0 County: '.44 S Region:my
Farm Name: il a�'�Ln ( �Ff� '� Owner Email:
Owner Name: F-06e 'cYyi9V`404) Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C it,n.�l`5 'g c 5Q, i Le L Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: IL Integrator: l f 7 S ee
Certified Operator: • L.f (AL `'� ,j p 164-0 Certification Number: Ii 7 51
V
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
•Feeder to Finish 1-1Lf 10 43 ri Dairy Heifer
_Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [a 1A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q_iQA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
• d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No EKA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes„ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes IIPEIo ❑ NA El NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 4 2-0 Date of Inspection: f 4_U Cz iv
Waste Collection&Treatment /
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ O ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No VI.INK ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): (33
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑_Ne-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes u 1VU = NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ` 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): l "cS 6 D 'CO ,,4 - y�
13. Soil Type(s): Ajc 6tJ _
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Yii' - ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes EX ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes laO ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents ,—� �
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L+ 1Ve ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: -8 Z- 6All Date of Inspection: ' Z 6.1p
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes []< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E l 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ©INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ]-1<- ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0--No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes r] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ®-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ceij G pket.)-(--/ex, q—go--- 36-t_c4 tsia_ s 1-6-( — I
5-9:VdN-0 p D 0144 6
se_ c(C e_473
154 ��1 , �,L4) 30 p,i t roci-eer/
cY1( 1,0_3 0 s — 9 c
Reviewer/Inspector Name: LI 40 0 U a p Phone: l b"43 S 3y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j 41) �, Z.b 20
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015