820615_Plan of Action (POA)_20200729

•
®ivision of Water Resources #6 5 et 74-4,11
C�
Facility Number z - �' / 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation .
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®om 'ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1$,mP Arrival Time: '?( I Departure Time: 1cc35J7 County: S4L 450V1 Region: r y
.� £ l , + "c
Farm Name: c h e- y ��j 6il �--� Owner Email:
Owner Name:. �ct5' i9 L y c1 Otet,1(,f Phone:
Mailing Address: '
Physical Address: •
Facility Contact: l &t4 S 3 etArki b eft Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: L` Integrator: 'P./A-0 Fct `a
Certified Operator: UcLsv t^i I V1,c t(1 - Certification Number: I ct I
Back-up Operator: ,. Certification Number:
`Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer . Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish (1 j 3 A 0 a,� Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars _ Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other _ Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of:he operation? ❑ Yes ®-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?, ❑ Yes ❑ No E�lA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) - ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑A .❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ErN1 ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Qe< ❑ NA El NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 l S Date of InspectionAGjj-, �'�
Waste Collection&Treatment f
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [2]NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes lalo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El--Pro ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes a-6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 17J410 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): S 6 ,mow s CO A-
13. Soil Type(s): Wet., 141,4-J-0 G (/\ g I GL - -i
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 .❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes DIG ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall El Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA El NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: gk - (1 t S Date of Inspection: 2, T-( AO°`I/
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
E Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®- ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA E NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ©1lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes lago ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 4io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
cw<<t `91 i_ CI,1 ct SC re- Sccci 3 �j., 0- zo os-L '- ( :6
8 t 5 d-�'' OW -�0 l�
1��
C-eAt, lc0 - 3006 - (9 $ 51
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 'CJ Z`l Q 0vdoi� Phone: l ter 13 3"3 3'" 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ( jp Date: Q,el Z�,�e( 0 VO
Page 3 of 3 G 2/4/2015