820594_Inspection_20200806

Vt VDivision of Water Resources W►t $ II i c,- 7-0 2i0
Facility Number 143Z - 6-e" O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ��
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 01,Cohi • nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: l4U6 ?.i j Arrival Time: p S (S
'ft- Departure Time: 1-1(S County:g4 l4 p�O IV Region: 1__A i
Farm Name: b44 , Fct---ni.c l l--✓c r1 5. `L.O '-- J Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0 qck �� L ```vv (� t`-n Jl�'d I.h C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: (/
Facility Contact: CG .,4`— 6 e "C&k(��- Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: tU Integrator: v'-e S/Lctq e,
Certified Operator: 1 �ti CaA4 . Certification Number: ✓( U 37 0
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer •Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish f(a,V0 /iOI1---i _ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers - Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers _ Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets ;Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other -
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El< n NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ®1TA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑rlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ?2 - 607-• Date of Inspection: 624 2-0141)
Waste Collection&Treatment 3 71 /
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [t]--NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No �lA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 6`1_3 .tit 33
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Zi
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ " ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes aie ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm• • •1 threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es 01151 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ iVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind'tee-0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ,6) S 0 soy, s `'VU•" / I L et (A)/91.
13. Soil Type(s): G—& ,JVD
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes D'IsTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ri-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes In< ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Ej-❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [.Ie— ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking El Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes it
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: a_ - k '�
! Date of Inspection: 6 44.9 L Z
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey •❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA El NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
tl,rw 6 vl g(t4'LJ6
p r
-2., 2-3
7
c(-3 3 poi 5 5 cA tuoo d2y 1) T
Cl( g b.‘_ p ec*-11 ovt e 4•-- '`o'vitt kl-/
:To - 305 --6 5i
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 61, ti uvi, Phone:Cp tiZ 3`3 J 3 tt
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: sj dt, T Date: fb Zo
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015