820582_Inspection_20200729

ivi i in of Water Resources 6 tilti 5 x� s'";A. 2,p CO
Facility Number M - 5( y� 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation A.
.
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other. 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ' Arrival Time: 'J i 00 6- Departure Time: Id%&J 1
, j � r i County:5'4 '( Region:
Farm Name: �o I ( e I---q,J. v �� Owner Email:
- f� 13
Owner Name: L I L"V�4 7f pr/� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: •
Facility Contact: a .._.1/41!S' olLC6 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: /( Integrator: (Pr-�
Certified Operator: El-- rorto Certification Number: /9? /6'7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current - Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish ° f t‘S Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n Yes / o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8-NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No LJNA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ilb E NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 41 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 'Z - 9 Z Date of Inspection: a`tch-' 8'CJA4-I
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes fill No = NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2 ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): y
VV
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes El:No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ INlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I V6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [-l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12-ICio ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): =�i S&-o MLP
13.Soil Type(s): "B k' ✓ c�� 46, /(9
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? 0 Yes ©'Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [r]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

)
Facility Number: F Z - V Date of Inspection:Xi1 L, ap'
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0,11"--o
❑ NA El NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check El Yes allo•❑ NA El NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑-1 El NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ NO ❑ NA El NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document El Yes alto--El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ErNo- ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ek3tr-0 NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Et-No— ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Lallo El NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
CA(1 L.tfrv4 Ik`9"--` at Itt_...554_ get.azy
Lf7
Cam ) � `I0 ' o8 r� °G� t
Reviewer/Inspector Name: B l% -OvAlcp PhoneAt 33--J`j �
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: —E Date: \14AI 0�
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015