820580_Inspection_20200910

-: - ° _ - - • Division.of Water—Resources', F 7;1 °" ,° _.
Facility Number ��_ O Division of Soil and Water Conservation..
0 Other Agency s o'._
Type of Visit: Q'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Gl
Reason for Visit: mp�itine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 9.--/p1Fato Arrival Time:I/ '/j Departure Time: 42.'Dv County:c� .gyp —Region: a
Farm Name:,__L '7' . . .o--ti, lGxs`H1, Owner Email:
Owner Name: :ILl f ,1S a-` Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 4!`e� /, ®7,`-z- Title: Thjt 'j r r . Phone:
Onsite Representative: Z4 O _ Integrator: !' ai`Vr� 1ok
Certified Operator: elite .T"A� ---- Certification Number: ,2-e90,2 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
.Design Current a Design Current Design Current.
Swine np ,= Capacity Pop: Wet Poultry ',Capacity -,Pop.; Cattle Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 0© 2-Ot9c'7 Dairy Heifer
_Farrow to Wean = 'Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _ D . Poul ,.Ca•aci Po•.- Non-Dairy
- Farrow to Finish • -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
EBMIE
Other ", •Turke Pouets u
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lal< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field 0 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No . ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [i]N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observabl"e adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [Z]N ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 1'2--- 3IO I Date of Inspection: .7--- f
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes RI< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: (3U f3 Y ut-)
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): r
Observed Freeboard(in): :S X 6r •
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Ergo NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 12Ks ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IS o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) C-
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require es �10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
•
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 12Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Approved Area
ep2
12.Crop Type(s): �V�t/`filctd'!�
13. Soil Type(s): W¢��/avv�
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 1V0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1121-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey •
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: $ -` ,D Date of Inspection: 5_j0-- j)
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes la No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Li No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Er-N-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 121" -To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the' ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains.exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA 0 NE
❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ajt) uzot d - d J --/ L,s t� 'D �
Aa L-r- r 7L G ttr e d- `/'�> PU/ryVP
17
/YlDuI gel. er, z��0 w i ✓�/ b�' C 0-
�j � Cu m sty
AA)1 4S cO/ -‘-a� A
Guia
c ,d j rc)
f?E' 0,45-720,i-e02J0( "rrittr-i•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,v Phone: gi0—.3.63 t(5 l
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y� . �i Date: /1)` . D
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015