820577_Inspection_20200730

ivision of Water Resources <6'CIS 30 mitt Z„o
Facility Number g Z 57 7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation `
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0-CO mmpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
G Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 c•ay.lt j d✓°`"'' Arrival Time: `t.` Id O A- Departure Time: /6 . `fV County: .c.4? Ec 2 19 Region:t 1 y
Farm Name: TV'pie ' ha"-►mot f — Owner Email:
Owner Name: ( ✓'t�/1[., ' a7.-r wt.s JI VVC- Phone:
Mailing Address: i I
Physical Address: /q CL( C 11 r Ccr pis - t- fj
Facility Contact: eU, 45 R cz-`toccf Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: l( Integrator: �0Ir- Sfe
Certified Operator: c/-r ,) ci..-+ iiic (,11 e vii L' I Certification Number: 13708 .
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: ,
13 -1v ce`tr--- lad es ck A tct► c f\re
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder (be is- -15I.$ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
_Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current - Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder -
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
_Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts _ Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
_Turkeys
Other _Turkey Poults
IOther Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0/NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No M<TA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes I�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - S 7 Date of Inspection: f 0 e.ccy.z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [(j_;?T0 0 NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No aIQA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: -
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): •
Observed Freeboard(in): �-� *-7 a-i
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ilt<1-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Ate there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a, ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 1727es LJ 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application '
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes lErj10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lalTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (i A 54- L) 4 s4 I CLq_l�.7"e_
13. Soil Type(s): 4cc. ot.-
.14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? 0 Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA 0 NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes To 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: C 2 577 Date of Inspection:30 0 '7y'
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [r]clo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Ifr\I—o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA El NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes II No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C t t t 0 (i05t Sc,,r y `1
i 31
L'tt �C (.7 s 764 P( 61(,t,L1
3 f k � 7
'7-4-'7 0)0 CO LAIL OD ik tei'vef(5 1/469 VC t 4.20 ClY L)'.82 se-4-'7'1 —64'e- 5169P‘e
10 -3 0 g s
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,J . \A 11 to Phone: 110`NJ-3-3
J 33 (
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 6I uPP (� CA)uviy Date:36 ')---`'idLk( hb
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015