820557_Inspection_20200827

�h IVrI 1-1v" f•-vn-v
cia Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 8 7 - SS? 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied,1 Access
Date of Visit: � ,4 ;2.o*) Arrival Time: l,�t 3O p Departure Time: jr t.5p County:s!/Q�()son) Region:F4 y
Farm Name: E 13 C, Fa-tip" Owner Email:
Owner Name: 6 oG FoLAfwi,t &LC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ((AA'1 CC C Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: E Sm i
Certified Operator: ¶3 t _ ,t - [ P "5 Certification Number:I
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
•Wean to Feeder Y t (90 ,3,5 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
•Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No lEr5A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No L I NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ENA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e �`] Date of Inspection:2`j ilr2,0Z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ©1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No a- I6A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 1 C, T(
-
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Elio ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) ,
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
/threat,notify DWR
�Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? i7, Yes f d4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes QA ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ';`' ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land.application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. - ❑ Yes aNt El NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑` I Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CIS SL--O / (J P
13. Soil Type(s): 14'f&_
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 2 o ❑ NA. ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1114o.
❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes D40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did'the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [2O ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes a<c> ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 11j4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes & ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

n
Facility Number: a- cc 57 Date of Inspection: 7, -c 26)
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes a o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes MA ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [go ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues /
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �, � o, ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 114 0 NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1114 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes t J,io ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes LJ 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C otriodc` t O"V ' SI LH 1 ,c( 5
1
e-4-[(
Y
9
'te
LStf
ko [ 0 ru‘ ( g
c1 eti 0 -3 0 e- •
Reviewer/Inspector Name: .0) ,t`1%k- 0'9Yhl,°p Phone:,,10 3- -3 33
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 jt! CY�{A Date: ),14—D
f 3 o Page 3 2/4/2015