820546_Inspection_20200715

' / tol"'v
s - elDivision of Water Resources (, I. Z.I).?�
Facility Number t`J vt/ .(e, 0 Divisionfof Soil and,Water:Corse ahain,,.... ""
0 Other Agency/7` r : s 77 :- =
Type of Visit: .)aelimpli ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: MEM Arrival Time: /b&/,c Departure Time:11/ 3'u4— County: S'4)41 PS Okl Region: Of—
Farm Name: �,,,t,„p,I 2�1 eye )jtt-'Se-,-' i/ Owner Email:
Owner Name: ai./ g. /7 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:Facility Contact: e,,-( F,,, /Ce Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: I ( Integrator: --t4+64 —
Certified Operator: I( Certification Number: 1 b (3 ,
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current ,' Design Current - Design Current
Swine, ,Capacity Top. Wet Poultry , Capacity Pop. Cattle, :Capacity -Top.
Wean to Finish Layer 'Dairy Cow
_Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean _ Design Current z Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca'aci Poi. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- - Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets • Beef Brood Cow
• Other -t ` •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts �,-, �/
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ In
Yes c ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ dA/ ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NoiA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

•
Facility Number: PI - c qk: Date of Inspection: /5 far ?"'X
Waste Collection&Treatment � ���
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes I__N ❑ NAS ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No II A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2 !
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IJNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) -
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a El Yes I1J 1V V ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7 Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 2 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the'structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes No El NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes R io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?, -
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes ©-117:7 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes laN5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop�� Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): $1 i i/�TI a55 LC-6"
13. Soil Type(s): ,e.4.. (;- b
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ I�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
rTh
. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? In Yes [ fro ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ' El Yes ro ❑ NA. ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes n o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ o El NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check El Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
El WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and-1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes I�J o El NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes gNo El NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - .S-109 Date of Inspection:/c ;tJ 7 2 42
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ElICTO-
❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ElYes [.-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes alsitT ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ (�PN'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes l'N6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Octi(b/t414-1 k
—11
514t,
LyctL
«
4- 1,5 l`ciAwA'51 /Zev.kope C v b p l
C-0 q(0 0
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Y.) l a Phone:?1G.- J 33 Y
Tb.t
c
`.Jd Reviewer/Inspector Signature: '� l / Date: ( ��1��y
Page 3 o
f
3 �J 2/4/20I5