820536_Inspection_20200729

ivision of Water Resources 6`y tg 11 fto 2t7
Facility Number ME - 53 to 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compfiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit D Arrival Time: '1! 1 s it-- Departure Time: J(? County: ��) 1°3 D{� Region: Fit-
. r
Farm Name: C Ntcys' 7 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0-11tell 1 5 cot f 1 L V'C' r Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: a„.4 5 13 `c,..i Gt
Facility Contact: t c Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: �' V Integrator: P rr 'e
n
J� `- W I
Certified Operator: r\I`�°i. r p C _2J'e�{ Certification Number: -(. (� ,
Back-up Operator: I Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder P9 7 O 'I&i Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts _ Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 3 1"t' ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 04 A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 02-- S3 6 Date of Inspection: oz 7-rw`j/ �l
Waste Collection &Treatment L
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 11/ZINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No a1GA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the,structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes El4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0- ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C p c Go - Co rvt,
13. Soil Type(s): `,,,v+o\ v v o y 4
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes El'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q Ido ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: F2 - 3 N Date of Inspection: �� R,�y 2.0 PD
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes .❑ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes J2c o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
I
--c_ cycw-by Lf
C/G wt. O GJU��-' 0 v101 Lt>� 1Z fZ 6*s;(71-
Ell j O ,-3®& -6 C 1
t�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 3311
(�1/�,�G�� Phone: 1,�V
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1� Date: ro, TLt t kO
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015� (9