820502_Inspection_20200731

(3iiivision of Water Resources BM, 3 40 Zp
Facility Number r(Z- - 5 yZ. 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation nco
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: G-C'ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0/Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: -26 Arrival Time: 11!50 4Departure Time: 1,2ft to P County: sR-1V PS /I) �'Y Region: �
Farm Name: ,La yelt LL-C, L Z Owner Email:
Owner Name: eoI4 rl`-e.- 4/A,(7 t-nI Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: atoll-6 17a r+i cr-K Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1,L Integrator: P; S/ ay e-
•
Certified Operator: I Certification Number: / ZO
Back-up Operator: ( Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish ?A(j jl Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No E NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E1'N"A n NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ergo o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes DN ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: &1- .SoZ Date of Inspection: 3'(S4y 2.k.)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 130 NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2 f3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes n IAA— ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) v
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ O ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [p6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _Ij ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes laKO- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground E Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C S 6-0
13. Soil Type(s): � to,,
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ELL\to ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1:2-1C
w El NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q4Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes . To-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate.of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes g1 e- E NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ N-6 ❑ NA E NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1=1) ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall E Stocking E Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ Ko- ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 62- .5()Z Date of Inspection:3(J-LLPlc>Z9
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes jmoo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ no ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes al<c ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑'I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes COX NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [d]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes '-vl"- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(/61,1t'64-i G(q- <, a--v.e I—)4.- t? --- 6r c fi-5 C 3 SZ
Lei 013\0 eV�r� (/l� c LI,L j V b .c�! C��� l(�t, C (7c2c-e IOC)
0 tttk. (t. p ►' afr` `f u S C l `"' 14c S* G(!
/ e— letv_co(„ellt
To -3OP`48 g(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 13 L �l bv,Lp Phone:e(to'1. 3 3 33 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (4) u� Date: :)I 3-2, -/
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2 I 5