820494_Inspection_20200731

ivision of Water Resources R 1 ,$ 3 L0
Facility Number s - 91 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation �V� '0
0 Other Agency 1`l�
Type of Visit: Q.Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: altaitine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: '71, 4-04) Arrival Time: 77,i 11' Departure Time: ett_ 0111- County: c itr-s'0 IA) Region:F(-
Farm Name: lam, 4-41"-e F t.-5 Liz., iaL (\kw Al Owner Email:
Owner Name: ;, (\ `,- t--6-1(mf Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 2 v
Facility Contact: C/,4,‘‘'-41 s `f t('`t; Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: � Integrator: J44--
Certified Operator: e( Certification Number: 10 3((7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 7 c;d 0— Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E • ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No —A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Ofi1A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No al< ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 111'1(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes I2Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

v
Facility Number: e 2,- Date of Inspection:31 Sr 2e)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes �❑ NAA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q-ICA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): - ,70
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I� ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ J_Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El-NO❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ©1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ITt< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C(�,J
13. Soil Type(s): ,J p Il.LLs
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 111'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes, check ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: '- 9 y;-' Date of Inspection: c'/ '7 76
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes DINO— ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [ Fd't❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑-N6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 026 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes bNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
i
"32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes fNo_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ®` To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ced i 6v/.i-re-.-, /1'_ SS -- f t- d c- / O.=r t 3 1)- Ltt �
Nu FT s 1 kL 20 h`7
po 51 X0 vi, (irt /Ay (.. 6,,,,,,„,,-dz..
e-4 _1( 0 306 -Vs(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: g 1 II OUi11 f Phone: I (,'- (1•3 3-3-73 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: '6 91 1i,,dy ?c�1 �_Date: Ufi ,-
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015